Objectives of the study here reported on were to: (1) learn as much as possible concerning the natural history and economic importance of the cottonmouth; (2) determine what factors limit its geographic distribution; (3) determine the role of the cottonmouth in its ecological community; and (4) compare the cottonmouth's life history with that of other crotalid snakes, especially the kinds that are most closely related to it.

Twenty-five live cottonmouths were kept in the laboratory for the purpose of studying behavior and fang shedding and for comparison of measurements with those of preserved specimens. Live snakes were obtained in Brazoria and Nacogdoches counties, Texas, from Hermann Park Zoo, Houston, Texas, and from the late Paul Anderson of Independence, Missouri. Preserved western cottonmouths were examined for the purpose of determining variation, distribution, food habits, body proportions, embryonic development, and reproductive cycles. The cottonmouths examined include: 221 from Texas; 33 from Arkansas; 22 from Louisiana; 2 from Illinois; and 1 each from Kansas, Mississippi, and Oklahoma.

In the preparation of this report I have examined all available literature pertaining to the cottonmouth and have drawn from these sources for comparative or additional material. Some of the more noteworthy contributions to knowledge of the cottonmouth are the general accounts of the life history by Allen and Swindell (1948), Barbour (1956), and Wright and Wright (1957); the publications by Gloyd and Conant (1943) concerning taxonomy; Klimstra (1959) concerning food habits; and Allen (1937), Parrish and Pollard (1959), Swanson (1946), and Wolff and Githens (1939b) concerning the venom. Numerous other publications, although brief, contain worthwhile contributions. Also of special interest as a source of material for comparison of cottonmouths with other crotalids are the works of Fitch (1960) on the copperhead and of Klauber (1956) on the rattlesnakes.

The cottonmouth has been well known for nearly 200 years. Wright and Wright (1957) listed the following vernacular names that are applied to the cottonmouth: black moccasin, black snake, blunt-tail moccasin, congo, copperhead, cottonmouth water moccasin, cotton-mouthed snake, gapper, highland moccasin, lowland moccasin, mangrove rattler, moccasin, North American cottonmouth snake, North American water moccasin, North American water viper, pilot, rusty moccasin, salt-water rattler, stubtail, stump (-tail) moccasin, stump-tail viper, swamp lion, Texas Moccasin, trapjaw, Troost's moccasin, true horn snake, true water moccasin, viper, water mokeson, water pilot, water rattlesnake, and water viper.

Some of the names listed above are based upon superstition and folklore prevailing in pioneer times, and others are based upon the behavior or appearance of the snake at various ages. Names like "stump-tail moccasin" are derived from the appearance of females which have short tails or snakes that have lost part of the tail. Names like "gapper" and "trapjaw" came to be applied because of the habit of the snake's lying with its mouth open when approached. The name "cottonmouth" also was derived from this behavior, although the lining of the mouth is whitish in most other snakes. The term "rattlesnake" may have come from the fact that the cottonmouth vibrates its tail vigorously when nervous as do many other snakes, or it may have been confused with rattlesnakes. Because of the general public's fear of snakes and their reluctance to learn to discriminate between the poisonous and harmless species, numerous kinds of snakes seen in or near water have been called moccasins. The general appearance, pugnacious behavior, and whitish mouth of water-snakes (Natrix) have earned them a bad reputation. In fact, a great majority of the "cottonmouths" reported in many areas are found to be water-snakes.

The cottonmouth is economically important mainly because of the injurious or fatal effects of its bite and the psychological effect that its actual or suspected presence has upon many persons. The species eats a wide variety of prey items and helps to prevent overabundance of certain kinds of organisms. The venom has been used in the therapeutic treatment of blood clots owing to its anticoagulant properties (Didisheim and Lewis, 1956). It also is employed in the treatment of haemorrhagic conditions and rheumatoid arthritis, as well as in the production of antivenin (Allen and Swindell, op cit.:13). None of these uses of venom has become widely accepted, and its value is questionable.