Having shown in the preceding pages that in the point of view of scientific accuracy the yard, mÈtre, and toise standards are on a common level, and that in the matter of comparisons there is no extreme accuracy, I will now refer to the proposed change of our standard from the yard to the mÈtre. Theoretically the mÈtre is the 10,000,000th part of the earth’s quadrant, and the yard the 36/39·13929th part of a seconds pendulum at London. Practically, neither the mÈtre nor yard could be recovered with exactness from their natural basis. The legal French mÈtre differs from the latest reduction enough to give an excess of over three miles to the circumference of the earth. In fact, the mÈtre and yard are only the lengths of bars of metal kept in certain offices, from which copies are made. Decimally considered, it is as easy to divide one as the other into tenths, hundredths, etc., and the yard standard is often so divided. As to nomenclature, the metrical system is overloaded with Greek and Latin prefixes, which are in no way so easy and convenient in expression as the short, sharp Anglo-Saxon words yard, foot, inch. In all sciences Latin and Greek names are given for easier purposes of classification; but the different peoples invariably keep their own household names for daily purposes, leaving prefix and affix to specialists, probably with advantage to both parties. The units used for different purposes are entirely distinct For long distances the units in the yard and metrical systems are respectively the mile and the kilomÈtre. The mile has a definite meaning in our minds, being associated, from the days of youth, with the measured distances in race-courses, speed in walking, railway and steamer travel, length of surveyed lots—the same being in use among about 100,000,000 people. For mechanical structures, the units are respectively the foot and the mÈtre. The foot is used instead of the yard, as being the most convenient in practice, and is fixed in the minds of the people by constant association with length of foot-rules, size of buildings, doors, windows, etc., all of which are always before us. For commercial purposes the units are respectively the yard and the mÈtre. The yard is associated with length of yard-sticks, distance between brass nails on counters, so many finger-lengths by ladies. Probably three fourths of the business of the world is conducted on the yard standard. For machine and shop work the English unit is the inch and fractions, and countries having the metrical standard have universally adopted the millimÈtre. The inch is well fixed in the minds of all mechanics by constant use, and the ease with which the fractions are had by halving only renders the system very convenient. As more figures must be used to indicate a size by millimÈtres than by inches and fractions, it appears that the metrical system cannot shorten the work of arithmetical computation in shop work, and is therefore of no advantage to the mechanic or draftsman, but rather the In France itself the metrical system is not wholly decimal in actual practice, as we find the following measures in use in addition to the decimal divisions: double decamÈtre, demi-decamÈtre, double mÈtre, demi-mÈtre, and double decimÈtre. The metrical system has been adopted in the following countries: France and colonies, Holland and colonies, Belgium, Spain and colonies, Portugal, Italy, Germany, Greece, Roumania, British India, Mexico, New Granada, Ecuador, Peru, Brazil, Uruguay, Argentine Confederacy, Chili, Venezuela; and partially in Wurtemburg, Bavaria, Baden, Hesse, Switzerland, Denmark, Austria, and Turkey. In the past centuries all the work and records of English-speaking peoples—now numbering about 100,000,000, and increasing and progressing faster than all other nationalities, as well as being closely connected by descent and business—have been done and recorded under the yard standard, and any change now would inevitably render necessary continual reductions, to the great detriment and inconvenience of the mass of our people, and with little or no practical benefit, except perhaps to a small class of scientific and pseudo-scientific men, who can and do amuse themselves with the fancied uniformity of the mÈtre. All our numerous text-books and tables, mechanical and scientific, would be rendered entirely useless by the change, and this is a serious final consideration. |