Mediaeval Church Vaulting

INDEX

Abbreviations.—Ch., Church; Cath., Cathedral; Ab. Ch., Abbey Church; N. D., Notre Dame; S. M., Santa Maria, Saint Mary, etc.

A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z

Aachen—Royal Chapel, 26, 36, 160, 161, 176.
Agliate—Ch., 16 note 35.
Aigues-Vives—Ch., 21.
Airaines—Ch., 48 note 160, 161, 49.
Aisles—vaults of, 96 et seq.
Albi—Ch., 80, 81 note 221, 143 note 35, Fig. 34.
Almeno-San-Salvatore—San Tommaso, 161.
Alternate Supports—system of, 47.
Ambert—Saint Jean, 148.
Ambroise—Saint Florentin, 104.
Ambulatory—vaulting of, 158 et seq.
—— origin of vaulting of, 159.
—— with annular tunnel vaults, 161.
—— with half tunnel vaults, 160.
—— with transverse tunnel vaults, 161.
—— with groined vaulted trapezoidal bays, 162.
—— with ribbed vaults, 163 et seq.
—— with vaults with added ribs, 171.
—— with multiple ribbed vaults, 181.
Amiens—Cath., 79, 80, 86, 100, 123, 137 note 29, 145, Fig. 69.
Anclam—Ch., 182 note 50.
Angers—Cath. Saint Maurice, 48, 51 57, 123 note 54, 155, Figs. 19, 74.
—— La TrinitÉ, 70, 71, Fig. 30.
—— Saint Serge, 51, 55, 104, Fig. 21.
AngoulÊme—Cath. of Saint Pierre, 5, 6, 7, 8, 105, 106, Figs. 3, 4.
Anjou—Churches of, 49 et seq.
Antwerp—Saint Jacques, 150.
Anzy-le-Duc—Ch., 39.
Apse—vaults of, 124 et seq.
—— vaulted with half domes, 124.
—— with ribbed half-domes, 125.
—— with “groined” half-domes, 128.
—— with four-part ribbed vaults, 129.
—— with a central pier, 152.
Arbona—Ch., 122.
Arles—17.
—— Saint Trophime, 20, 146, 180 note 44.
—— Saint Honorat in Les Alyscamps, 125, 126.
—— Saint Jean-de-Moustier, 126 note 3.
Assisi—San Francesco, 52, 57.
Auvergne—School of, 16, 25 et seq.
Auxerre—Cath., 123, 142 note 34, 152, 156, 173, 174, 178, 184, Figs. 75, 84.
—— Saint Germain, 173, 184.
—— Saint Pierre, 152.
Aversa—Cath., 166.
AvesniÈres—Ch., 49.
Avignon—chapel of the Pont Saint-Benezet, 99 note 275.
—— Cath. N. D. des Doms, 115, 126.
Azy—Chapel, 34 note 101, 132.
Barcelona—Cath., 104 note 279, 147, 148.
Barletta—Cath., 26 note 74.
Bath—Ab. Ch., 92, 123.
Bayeux—Cath., 122 note 53, 148, 153.
—— Seminaire, Chapel of, 148 note 48.
Bayonne—Cath., 123, 148, 176, Fig. 86.
Beaugency—Saint Étienne, 113.
Beaulieu—Ab. Ch., 127.
Beauvais—Basse-Oeuvre, 74.
—— Cath., 69 note 190, 86, 101, Fig. 46.
—— Saint Étienne, 67, 69, 74, 96, 99, Figs. 32, 44.
—— Saint Lucien, 110 note 15.
Beeskow—Ch., 180 note 44.
Belem—Ab. Ch., 104 note 279.
BÉnÉvent-l’Abbaye—Ch., 36, 115.
Bernay—Ch., 42 note 138.
Berne—Minster, 85 note 233, 94.
BerniÈres-sur-Mer—Ch., 64.
Berzy-le-Sec.—Ch., 127 note 7.
Beurey-Beauguay—Ch., 1.
Beverley—Minster, 79.
BÉziers—Cath., 151, 155.
Blois—ChÂteau, chapel, 83, 93.
—— Saint Nicolas, 117, 184, Fig. 56.
—— Cath. Saint Louis, 145 note 41.
Boisney—Ch., 113.
Bois-Sainte-Marie—Ch., 162.
Bologna—San Francesco, 69, 142 note 34, 151.
—— San Petronio, 57 note 175.
Bonnes—Ch., 127 note 7.
Boppart—Ch., 74.
Bordeaux, Cath., 114.
—— Saint Michel, 123 note 54.
Boscherville—See Saint Martin-de-Boscherville.
Bourges—Cath., 68, 137, 142, 153, 156, 169, 178, Fig. 76.
—— Maison de Jacques Coeur, 93.
—— Saint Pierre-le-Guillard, 72 note 200, 138, 147.
Bourgogne—School of, 11, 16, 18, 26 note 77, 31 et seq.
Boxgrove—Priory Ch., 48.
Bragny-en-Charollais—Ch., 39 note 121.
Braisne—Saint Yved, 121, 182.
Brandenburg—Cath., 180.
BrantÔme—Ch., 48 note 160.
Brauveiller—Ch., 42 note 136.
Breda—Groote Kerk, 172 note 36.
Bremen—Cath., 71.
Brescia—Duomo Vecchio, 161 note 16.
Breslau—Heiligekreuze, 111 note 16.
Bristol—Cath., 101.
Berkeley Chapel, p. 95, note 272.
—— Saint Mary Redcliffe, 85, 87.
Bruges—Cath. Saint Sauveur, 138, 172 note 36.
Brunembert—Ch., 108 note 7.
BruyÈres—Ch., 127 note 7.
Burgos—Cath., 120, 172 note 36.
Bury—Ch., 52, 54, 164, Figs. 22, 23.
Caen—Abbaye-aux-Dames, see La TrinitÉ.
—— Abbaye-aux-Hommes, see Saint Étienne.
—— La TrinitÉ, 39, 40, 43, 59, 60, 62, 64, 65, 78, 107, Fig. 27.
—— Saint Étienne, 43, 59, 60, 62, 63, 65, 66, 76, 77, 103, 108, 135 note 25, 137, 144, 145, 146, Figs. 26, 70.
—— Saint Nicolas, 39, 129.
—— Saint Pierre, 94, 150, 151.
Cahors—Cath., 5, 6 note 21, 7 note 23.
Cambrai—Cath., 138.
Cambridge—King’s College chapel, 91 note 252, 92.
—— Saint Sepulchre, 116.
Canosa—San Sabino, 13 note 30, 14.
Canterbury—Cath., 69, 129, 141, 169, 183.
—— Trinity Chapel, 171.
Carcassonne—Saint Nazaire, 17, 19, 157 note 61.
Caryatid Supports—for ribs, 54.
Casamari—Ch., 69 note 194, 122.
Caudebec-en-Caux, N.D., 152.
Cavaillon—Ch., 36.
Centering—of Perigord domes, 7.
Cerce—48.
Cerisy-la-ForÊt—Ch., 64 note 180, 112 note 23.
Chalons-sur-Marne—N.D., 103, 177, also note 41.
—— Notre Dame-de-l’Épine (near), 149, Fig. 71.
—— Saint Alpin, 147.
Champagne—Ch., 12 note 29, 27 note 78, 162.
Chapelle-sur-CrÉcy, La—Ch., 152.
Chapels—transept, vaults of, 112.
Chartres—Cath., 137, 144, 145, 159, 173, Fig. 68.
Chateauneuf—Ch., 29 note 87.
Chatel-Montagne—Ch., 26, 29 note 87, and note 89.
Chatillon-sur-Seine—Ch., 36.
Chaumont—Ch., 104 note 279.
Chauvigny—N.D., 114.
—— Saint Pierre, 25.
Chelles—Ch. 127 note 7.
Chester—Cath., 84.
Chevets—110, 131 et seq.
—— square, 108.
—— radiating-ribbed, 132, 137.
—— broken-ribbed, 138.
—— buttressing-ribbed, 141.
—— diagonal-ribbed, 144.
—— with added ribs, 146.
—— impost level of vault ribs, 153.
—— shape of cells in, 154.
—— with pierced panels, 156.
Chichester—Cath., 65 note 184.
Clermont-Ferrand—Cath., 114, 158.
—— Notre Dame-du-Port, 27, also note 80, 106 h-6.htm.html#page_127" class="pginternal">127 note 7.
Lagny—Ch., 174 note 39, 182 note 50.
Landshut—Saint Martin, 104 note 279.
Lanfranc—59.
Langres—Cath., 168, 169, Fig. 80.
Lantern Towers—114.
—— with Eight-Part Vaults, 120.
Laon—Cath., 69 note 191, 103, 112, 121, 184, Figs. 48, 54, 60.
—— Church of the templars, 116. Fig. 55.
Bishops Palace, Chapel of, 133, Fig. 62.
Largny—Ch., 132.
Larnaca—Ch., 5 note 15.
Laval—La TrinitÉ, 48 note 160.
LÉrins—La TrinitÉ, 110 note 12.
—— Saint Honorat, 17 note 38, 19.
Lescar—Cath., 36.
Lessay—Ch., 43, 77.
Lesterps—Ch., 22.
Lichfield—Cath., 84, also note 232, 93, 101.
Lighting—of tunnel-vaulted churches, 18.
—— in naves with square bays, 57.
—— of half domed apses, 124.
Limburg—Cath., 71, 108.
Limoges—Saint Martial, 27 note 81, 29 note 87.
Lincoln—Cath., 65 note 184, 69, also note 192, 72 note 200, 82, 83, 84, 101, note 276, Figs. 35,

36.
LinkÖping—Cath., 104 note 279.
Lisseweghe—Ch. 182 note 50.
Loches—Saint Ours, 14, 15, 55, Figs. 9, 10, 24.
Loctudy—Ch. 160.
Loire—School of, 29 et seq.
Lombardy—24.
—— School of, 26 note 77, 42, 44 et seq.
London—Tower Chapel, 22, 159.
Louis VI—74.
LÜbeck—Saint Jakob, 182 note 50.
Lucheux—Ch., 48 note 160, 161.
Ludinghausen—Ch., 182 note 50.
Lusignan—Ch., 37.
Magdeburg—Cath., 72, 100, 101, 172 note 36.
—— Brunnenkapelle, 157.
Mainz—Cath., 41 note 133.
—— Saint Stephen, 104 note 279.
Malmo—Ch., 174 note 39.
Mans, Le—Cath., 47, 93, 171, 178, 180, 182.
—— La Couture, 48 note 160, 49, 50, 55, 57, 151 note 52, 183, Fig. 20.
—— N.D. du PrÉ, 64 note 180.
Mantes—Cath., 37, 69 note 191, 102, 146, 161.
Marburg—Saint Elizabeth, 104, 111 note 16.
Marseilles—La Major, 115 note 37.
Meaux—Cath., 26 note 74.
Mehun-sur-Yevre—Ch., 184 note 65.
Melle—Saint Pierre, 22, 24 note 60.
MÉziÈres—Ch., 94.
Milan—Cath., 79, 80, 155, 168.
—— Sant’ Ambrogio, 16 note 35, 41, 44, 46, 59, 60, 78 note 217, Fig. 18.
—— San Babila, 24 note 63.
—— Sant’ Eustorgio, 24 note 63.
—— San Nazzaro, 52 note 169.
Minden—Cath., 104 note 279.
Moissac—Ab. Ch., 138.
Molfetta—Cath., 13 also note 30, 20.
MollÈges—Saint Thomas, 17 note 37.
Monasterio de la Oliva—Ch., 127.
Montagne—Ch. 116 note 39.
MontiÉrender—Ch., 26.
Montmajour—Ch., 17 note 37, 127 note 7, 160.
Mont Saint Vincent—Ch., 35 note 103.
Morienval—Ch., 74, 78 note 219, 127, 152, 163, 166 note 26, 168, Figs. 77, 78, 79.
Moulins—Cath., 138, 147.
Nantes—Cath., 114.
Nantille—N.D., 116 note 39.
Naples—Cath. Baptistry, 2.
Narbonne—Cath., 114.
Naves—vaults of, 1 et seq.
—— and aisles of equal height, 104.
—— vaulted with domes on squinches, 8.
—— without side aisles, 48.
Nesle—Ch., 72 note 200.
Neubourg—Ch., 152 note 54, 178 note 42.
NeufchÂtel—Ch., 111 note 19.
Nevers—Cath., 55, Fig. 25.
—— Saint Étienne, 18 note 39, 29, 106, 125 note 2.
NÎmes—17.
—— amphitheatre, 159.
—— Nymphaeum, 17.
—— temple of Diana, 17, 126 note 3.
Normandy—59.
—— School of, 26 note 77, 42.
Norwich—Cath., 87, 184 note 65.
Notre Dame-de-l’Épine—Ch., 149, 150, Fig. 71.
Nouaille—Ch., 22 note 58.
Noyon—Cath., 67, 78 note 217, 99, 103, 110, 136 note 28, 141, 144.
Chapel of, 94, Fig. 41.
NÜrnberg—Saint Lorenz, 178.
Nymwegen—Ch., 26, 180.
Omonville-la-Rogue—Ch., 108 note 9.
Oppenheim—Ch., 182 note 50.
Orange—Cath., 37.
Orcival—Ch., 107, 115, 184 note 60.
Orleans—Saint Euverte, 123.
Ouistreham—Ch., 64.
Oxford—Cath., 87, 93.
—— Christ Church staircase, 91 note 253.
—— Proscholium, 87.
—— Schools, 86 note 236.
Paderborn—Cath., 104 note 279, 111 note 16.
Padua—Sant’ Antonio, 13 note 30, 148, 151 note 52.
Palestine—40.
Palognieu—Ch., 35 note 103.
Pamplona—Cath., 176.
—— San Saturnino, 146.
Paray-le-Monial—Ch., 32, 34, 163, 170, Figs. 14, 15.
Paris—Cath. N.D., 68, 103, 114, 122 note 50, 142, 180.
—— Sainte Chapelle, 56, 80, 104 note 279.
—— Saint Étiennne-du-Mont, 123.
—— Saint Eustache, 94, 180.
—— Saint Germain-des-Pres., 139, 141.
—— Saint Martin-des-Champs, 127, 135 note 25, 136 note 28, 138, 139, 141, 161, Fig. 65.
—— Saint Severin, 150, 180.
Parthenay-le-Vieux—Notre Dame, 20 note 46, 22.
Pavia—Certosa, 69, 72, 100.
—— San Lanfranco, 47.
—— San Michele, 46, 58 note 176, 60.
—— San Teodoro, 57 note 175.
Pendants—92.
Pendentives—3.
—— domes on spherical, 1.
Perigord—school of, 2, 6, 7, 51.
PÉrigueux—2.
—— Cath. of Saint Front, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 36 note 108, 105, 114, Figs. 1, 2.
—— Saint Étienne, 6, 7.
Peristeroma—Ch., 5 note 15, 8 note 25.
Perpignan—Cath. Saint Jean, 148.
Perugia—Cath., 104 note 279.
Peterborough—Cath., 89, 90, 91, 92, 99, Fig. 39.
Petit QuÉvilly, Le—Ch., 65, 66.
Pirna—Hauptkirche, 150 note 51.
Poitiers—Cath., 48 note 160, 51, 104.
—— Notre Dame-la-Grande, 24, 125 note 1.
—— Saint Hilaire, 11, 12, 36 note 105, 112 note 22, 125 note 1, Figs. 7, 8.
—— Sainte Radegonde, 48 note 160, 51, 57.
Poitou—21.
—— School of, 16, 23 et seq.
Pontaubert—Ch., 39 note 121.
Pontoise—Saint Maclou, 168, 174.
Pontorson—Ch., 77.
Prenzlau—Marienkirche, 104 note 279.
Preuilly-sur-Claise—Ch., 162.
Provence—School of, 16, 17 et seq., 125.
Provins—Saint Quiriace, 72, 140, 152, 153, Fig. 31.
Puiseaux—Ch., 108 note 9.
Puy, Le—Cath. of Notre Dame, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 35, Figs. 5, 6.
Quedlinburg—Saint Wipertus (near), 159.
Querqueville—Ch., 110 note 13.
QuimperlÉ-Sainte Croix, 159 note 7.
Radiating Chapels—Vaulting of, 183.
Ravenna—Palace of Theodoric, 24 note 63.
—— San Vitale, 2, 162.
Reims—Cath., 79, 80, 143, 152, 153.
—— Saint Jacques, 69, Fig. 29.
—— Saint Nicaise, 182.
—— Saint Remi, 37, 112 note 23, 135 note 25, 136, 141, 143 note 36, 154, 168, 173, 176, 177, 178, 184, Figs. 64, 83, 87.
Rhenish Provinces—School of, 26 note 77, 137, 141, 142, 143, 176, 184, Fig. 67.
Solignac—Ch., 6 note 21, 7 note 22, 114.
Souillac—Ch., 6 note 21, 105.
Southwell—Minster, 101 note 276.
Souvigny—Ch., 18 note 40, 22, 34, 93.
Speyer—Cath., 41 note 133, 42, 58.
Spoleto—San Salvatore or del Crocifisso, 114.
Squinches—domes on, 2.
Stargarde—Marien-kirche, 148, 180.
—— Johanniskirche, 180 note 44.
Stendal—S.M., 104 note 279.
Strassburg—Cath., 178 note 42.
Tag-Eivan—35.
Tarascon—Saint Gabriel, 17.
Tewkesbury—Ab. Ch., 87, 89, 150, 178 note 42, Fig. 38.
Thor—Ch., 127 note 7.
Tivoli—Villa Adriana, 2, 117, 128, 129.
Toledo—Cath., 178.
Torcy—Ch., 127 note 7.
Toro—Ch., 117 note 42.
Toul—Saint Gengoulf, 182 note 50.
Toulon-sur-Arroux—Ch., 39 note 121.
Toulouse—Jacobins, 182, Fig. 89.
—— Saint Nicholas, 81.
—— Saint Sernin, 18 note 41, 20 note 46, 28, 29, 112 note 23, 125 note 2, 162.
Tour—Ch., 108 note 9.
Tournai—Cath., 110,

133, 138, 169 note 29, 174, Figs. 53, 85.
Tournus—Saint Philibert, 34, 36, 162.
Tours—Saint Martin, 29 note 87, 114, 158, 183.
Trani—S. M. Immacolata, 13 note 30 and 32.
—— S. M. dei Martiri (near), 13 notes 30 and 32.
Transepts—Vaults of, 105, et seq.
—— semicircular vaults of, 110.
—— with tunnel vaults, 105.
—— with five-part vaults, 107.
TrÉguier—Cath., 106.
Tremolac—Ch., 105.
Treptow—Ch., 180 note 44.
Trier—Liebfrauenkirche, 182 note 50.
Triforium—Origin and use, in Auvergne, 25.
—— vaults of, 101.
Troyes—Cath., 123, 143 note 35.
—— Saint Urbain, 101, 108, 153, Fig. 73.
Tulle—Cath., 83, 93.
Upsala—Ch., 182.
Utrecht—Cath., 174 note 39.
Vaison—Cath., 20, 30.
Valentigny—Ch., 108 note 7.
Vauciennes—Ch., 108 note 7.
Vaults and Vaulting—tunnel, 16.
—— transverse over nave, 34.
—— transverse over aisles, 36.
—— Romanesque schools of tunnel-vaulted churches, 16.
—— tunnel with cross ribs, 37.
—— apse, 124 et seq.
—— pyramidal, 14.
—— groined, naves with, 37.
—— with Added Ribs—Outside of England, 93.
—— Fan Vaulting, 89.
—— ribbed, 43.
—— of side aisles, 96.
—— Tracery Vaults, 89.
—— Sexpartite, 58 et seq.
—— Pseudo-sexpartite, 62.
—— Eight-part, 72.
—— with Added Ribs, 81.
—— Tierceron Vaulting, 84.
—— Lierne Vaulting, 87.
—— Interpenetrating multiple ribbed, 88.
—— Five-part, 100, 107.
—— of triforia, 101.
—— of transept, 105.
Vauxrezis—Ch., 127 note 7.
Vendeuvre—Ch., 108 note 7.
Venice—Cath. San Marco, 13 note 30.
—— Frari, 57.
—— SS. Giovanni e Paolo, 57 note 175.
Verberie—Ch., 108 note 7.
Verona—Cath., 57 note 175.
—— Santo Stefano, 158, 159, 160, 166 note 26.
Vertheuil—Ch., 161.
VÉzelay—La Madeleine, 34, 38, 39, 40, 43, 101, 137, 140, 154, Figs. 16, 17, 66.
Viborg—Cath., 71.
Vicenza—SS. Felice e Fortunato, 24 note 63, 47.
Vieil-Arcy—Ch., 127 note 8.
Vieux Mareuil—Ch., 105.
Vigan—Ch., 182.
Vignory—Ch., 26, 152, 159.
Villemagne—Saint Gregoire, 64 note 180.
Villeneuve-le-Comte—Ch., 182 note 50.
Vizeu—Cath., 93.
Voulton—Ch., 74 note 203.
Voute-par-tranches—4.
Wells—Cath., 89.
Wesel—Saint Willibrord, 178.
Westminster—Ab. Ch., 79, 83, 147.
Islip’s Chapel, 92.
Henry VII’s Chapel, 92.
William of Sens—69.
Wimpfen—Stadkirche, 94.
Winchester—Cath., 87, 88, 104 note 279, 112 note 23.
—— Saint Cross, 108.
Windsor—Saint George’s Chapel, 89.
Worcester—Cath., 65 note 184, 83, 84, 101.
Worms—Cath., 119, 127 note 5, Fig. 58.
—— Liebfrauen kirche, 180 note 44.
Xanten—Ch., 182 note 50.
Ypres—Saint Martin, 151.
Zamora—Cath., 116, 117 note 42.

FOOTNOTES:

[1] Rivoira I, p. 29, et seq.; also Lasteyrie, p. 272, et seq.

[2] Lasteyrie, p. 274, and Fig. 268.

[3] Lasteyrie, p. 270.

[4] Early ex., Umm es-Zeitun illustrated in Rivoira, I, p. 35, Fig. 51.

[5] Rivoira, I, p. 193, Fig. 273.

[6] Rivoira, I, p. 57, Fig. 82.

[7] Rivoira, I, p. 33, Fig. 46.

[8] Rivoira, I, p. 35, Fig. 50.

[9] Lasteyrie, p. 465 et seq.

[10] Lasteyrie, p. 470.

[11] Lasteyrie, p. 472, Fig. 489.

[12] Exception to this at Fontevrault, see Reber, p. 358.

[13] See Choisy, I, p. 20.

[14] See Fig. 4.

[15] Other examples, all in Cyprus:

1) Peristeroma. 2) Hieroskypos. 3) Saint Barnabas. 4) Larnaca. Enlart, I, p. 210, and p. 286, note 3.

[16] Lasteyrie, pp. 473, 474.

[17] Lasteyrie, Figs. 491 and 498. Also cathedral of Cahors (original state) Fig. 495.

[18] See Lasteyrie, p. 473 and Enlart, I, p. 211, note 1.

[19] Lasteyrie, p. 474, Fig. 490.

[20] See Lasteyrie, p. 475.

[21] Among them, Cahors (Lot) Cath. (consecrated 1119); Souillac (Lot) Ch., Plan, Lasteyrie, Fig. 493; Fontevrault (Maine et Loire) Ab. Ch., Plan, Lasteyrie, Fig. 494; Gensac (Charente) Ch. (wooden roof over dome), Plan, Lasteyrie, Fig. 356. Section Lasteyrie, Fig. 496; Solignac (Haute-Vienne) Ch., (consecrated 1143).

[22] See also Gensac, Lasteyrie, Fig. 496, and Solignac, Fig. 264.

[23] Also Cahors Cath.,—PÉrigueux Saint Étienne, etc.

[24] See comparison of PÉrigueux, Saint Front, and Venice, San Marco in Lasteyrie, p. 470, Fig. 486 and p. 471, Fig. 487.

[25] Also Peristeroma (Cyprus), Enlart, I, p. 210 and p. 286, note 3; Hieroskypos (Cyprus), Enlart, I, p. 210 and p. 286.

[26] The clerestory is omitted in the earlier bays and the crossing has peculiar vaulting described in a later chapter.

[27] See Rivoira, I, p. 35, Fig. 51 and Lasteyrie, p. 267, Fig. 259 for examples of this awkward type.

[28] See Fig. 7. There is one rectangular bay at the end of the transept aisles and this is covered by an interpenetrating vault at the level of the transverse nave arches.

[29] In France, at Champagne (ArdÈche), there is a church vaulted in a manner similar to Le Puy, but it is doubtful whether such a method was the original intention of the builders, since each dome is placed over two rectangular nave bays. Enlart, I, pp. 289-291. Plan, Fig. 120. This is, however, a most interesting church for the domes are very segmental in section, are supported upon squinches and have transverse arches through their centers. There is also no clerestory and, in fact, the entire church is of the standard Auvergne type except for the vaults. A reference to the drawings in Baudot and Perrault-Dabot, Vol. V, pl. 27, will show this peculiar system.

[30] Among these may be cited: Venice, San Marco, reconstructed 1052 or 1071, dedicated Dec. 8, 1094, but added to and decorated in the twelfth century and later. Canosa, San Sabino (1101). Trani, Santa Maria Immacolata (twelfth century). Santa Maria dei Martiri (near Trani) (also twelfth century). Molfetta, Cathedral (late twelfth and early thirteenth century). Padua, Sant’ Antonio (thirteenth century) Byzantine-Gothic type, numerous Sicilian churches, etc.

[31] Plan, in Cummings, II, p. 18, Fig. 248. Interior in Michel, I, p. 542, Fig. 273.

[32] Similar churches: Trani, Santa Maria Immacolata, plan in Dehio and von Bezold, I, p. 354. Santa Maria dei Martiri, Ch.

[33] Rarely the case in Byzantine architecture.

[34] Choisy (Choisy, II, p. 201) thus accounts for the vaults, which would then be variants of Perigord domes, but the plan and supports of the pyramids suggest the influence of Le Puy.

[35] Examples in France: Grenoble, Saint Laurent (crypt of the seventh or eighth century), Germigny, des-PrÉs (ninth century), etc. Examples in Italy: Milan, Sant’ Ambrogio (choir of the ninth century), Agliate, etc.

[36] For illustrations of Romanesque churches and vaults, the reader is advised to consult Lasteyrie, Dehio and von Bezold, and Enlart.

[37] See also Montmajour (Bouches-du-RhÔne); Saint Martin-de-Londres (HÉrault); Saint Pierre-de-Redes (HÉrault); MollÈges (Bouches-du-RhÔne), Saint Thomas. See Reber, pp. 337, Figs. 201-202.

[38] Also LÉrins (Alpes-Maritimes), Saint Honorat (portion).

[39] Early examples: Saint Genou, choir (end of eleventh century), Saint BenoÎt-sur-Loire, choir (begun 1602), Nevers, Saint Étienne.

[40] The double-aisled abbey church of Souvigny, which has a clerestory, might be cited as an exception to this statement, but judging from the narrowness of its inner aisles (Fig. 19) it would appear as if its nave had originally been deprived of direct light, and that the present clerestory must have been introduced with or without a vault above it, either before or at the time when the outer aisles were added. If so, it would not prove an exception to the rule. The present nave vault is an addition of a late Gothic period.

[41] As in Saint Sernin at Toulouse.

[42] Reber, p. 341, Fig. 205a, and Lasteyrie, p. 413, Fig. 431.

[43] Reber, p. 342, Fig. 260a. See also, Abbaye de Fontfroide, Baudot and Perrault-Dabot, V, pl. 41.

[44] Found also in St. Paul-Trois-ChÂteaux, Lasteyrie, p. 412, Fig. 429.

[45] See pp. 13, 14.

[46] Exs., Issoire (Puy-de-DÔme), Saint Paul, see Enlart, I, p. 269, Fig. 102, or Choisy II, p. 209. Toulouse (Haute-Garonne), Saint Sernin, see Choisy, II, p. 212. Culhat (Puy-de-DÔme), Ch. Lasteyrie, p. 250, Fig. 241. Parthenay-le-Vieux (Deux-SÈvres), Notre Dame, ill. in Choisy, I, p. 205, etc.

[47] Enlart, I, p. 267, Fig. 100 and Lasteyrie, p. 413, Fig. 430.

The clerestory at Vaison is hardly worthy of the name, for its windows are cut entirely above the imposts of the vault, which is of pointed section, and therefore does not acquire thickness so rapidly as to render the windows too deep to admit a reasonable amount of light. The construction of such a clerestory consists merely in taking advantage of the pointed form of vaulting without presenting structural advances. Its windows are necessarily small and deep set and the system is not a satisfactory solution of the lighting problem.

[48] Revoil, II, pl. XVIII.

[49] Semicircular vaults were sometimes used, however. Example, Saint Paul-Trois ChÂteaux (Drome), Cath. (first half of the twelfth century), Lasteyrie, p. 412, Fig. 429, etc.

[50] Choisy, II, p. 206, Fig. 14.

[51] Enlart, I, p. 268, Fig. 101.

[52] Choisy, II, p. 205, Fig. 13.

[53] Lasteyrie, p. 250, Fig. 241.

[54] See statement to that effect in Rivoira, II, p. 106.

[55] See Dehio and von Bezold, p. 260.

[56] Ruprich-Robert, p. 8, Fig. 45, and Reber, Fig. 235.

[57] Lasteyrie, p. 455, Fig. 473.

[58] Lasteyrie, p. 456, Fig. 474, also Saint Jouin-de-Marnes (Deux-SÈvres), Baudot and Perrault-Dabot, II, pl. 32, and Nouaille (Vienne), Ch., Baudot and Perrault-Dabot, II, pl. 37.

[59] For example, the aisle vaults seldom carry the tile of the roofs outside of Provence and Auvergne.

[60] This arrangement is general in the school and may be understood by referring to the illustration of Melle, Saint Pierre, Lasteyrie, p. 455, Fig. 473. A number of churches which are exceptions to this rule have already been noted under Provence (see pp. 21, 22).

[61] See Lasteyrie, p. 454, Fig. 471.

[62] The three western bays of the church are early twelfth century and have transverse arches.

[63] Rivoira (Rivoira, I, p. 97) says that such arches were used beneath groined vaults as early as the eighth century in the palace of Theodoric at Ravenna, and gives as tenth century examples (p. 176) the aisles of Sant’ Eustorgio at Milan and the nave and aisles of S.S. Felice e Fortunato, at Vicenza, and as examples of the early eleventh century, the nave and aisles of San Babila, also at Milan.

[64] It is a question whether the transverse arches actually carried much or any of the weight of the vault. (See discussion of this point as regards crypts in Porter, Construction of Lombard and Gothic Vaults, pp. 17-18.) They did, however, strengthen the church by tying together the piers and walls besides saving centering as above stated.

[65] Lasteyrie, p. 455, Fig. 472.

[66] The influence of the Poitou system was quite extensive, however, as is shown by the little church of Saint Loup-de-Naud (Seine-et-Marne) (eleventh and twelfth centuries), Choisy, II, p. 207, Fig. 15.

[67] See Choisy, II, p. 210. The great objection to this is that they are not found in the neighboring provinces, in which much the same reason for having them must have existed.

[68] See Lasteyrie, pp. 388-391, for account of the latter.

[69] Rivoira, II, p. 283, Fig. 727.

[70] Michel I, p. 444, Fig. 208.

[71] Enlart I, p. 255, Fig. 94.

[72] Lasteyrie, p. 330, Fig. 354.

[73] Rivoira, II, p. 47, Fig. 410.

[74] Other examples showing extent of the method are, Barletta cathedral in Italy, and Rochester Cathedral (twelfth century) in England, while Rouen and Meaux cathedrals furnish Gothic instances. See also Enlart, I, p. 257, note 1.

[75] It is also worthy of note as showing the architectural influence of Lombardy and the Rhenish provinces upon Auvergne, that Chatel-Montagne has the alternate system of supports, a Lombard-Rhenish-Norman characteristic rarely found outside of these schools.

[76] This would also explain the elevation and vaulting of the aisles of JumiÈges-Abbey church, which are unlike those of the other churches of Normandy and yet not truly Lombard in type. See p. 43.

[77] It is also characteristic of the churches of Normandy, Bourgogne and the Rhenish provinces, all more or less strongly Lombard.

[78] An exception to this is to be seen in the church of Champagne (ArdÈche), see note 29.

[79] See section of Saint Saturnin (Puy-de-DÔme), Lasteyrie, p. 437, Fig. 454.

[80] Clermont-Ferrand (Puy-de-DÔme), Notre Dame-du-Port, Choisy, II, p. 230, Fig. 30.

[81] Example, Limoges (Haute-Vienne), Saint Martial, Lasteyrie, p. 251, Fig. 242.

[82] See also Issoire (Puy-de-DÔme), Saint Austremoine (early twelfth century), Michel, I, p. 461, Fig. 218. Saint Nectaire (Puy-de-DÔme) (eleventh century).

[83] Partly because the half tunnel vault in this part of the church required a strong and continuous impost.

[84] Already seen in Poitou.

[85] See discussion of this form of crossing on p. 106

[86] Saint Sernin served as a model for the Spanish church of Santiago-de-Compostella (eleventh and twelfth centuries), which shows the extended influence of Auvergne.

[87] Other examples are: Chatel-Montagne (Allier), Ch., Chateauneuf (SaÔne-et-Loire), Ch. Choisy, II, p. 245, Limoges (Haute-Vienne), Saint Martial, (destroyed, see Enlart, I, p. 256, note 5), without windows according to Lasteyrie (see Lasteyrie, p. 251, Fig. 242), Tours (Indre-et-Loire), Saint Martin (probable system).

[88] Illustrated in Baum, p. 154.

[89] See also Chatel-Montagne (Allier), Ch., Lasteyrie, p. 330, Fig. 354.

[90] Lasteyrie, p. 338, Fig. 360.

[91] The church of Fontgombault (Indre) (Baum, p. 265) is a similar church, but of later date (consecrated 1141), which might be classed as belonging to the “Loire school.”

[92] See Lasteyrie, p. 424.

[93] Reber, p. 351.

[94] Rivoira, II, p. 106.

[95] Rivoira, II, p. 106, Fig. 490.

[96] The plan as given in Guadet, p. 265, Fig. 1127, shows groined vaults in both aisles, and the portion of the church remaining would make it seem probable that it originally had groined aisles in one story, but the matter is of little importance here.

[97] Lasteyrie is of the opinion that these walls were raised to make it possible to place straight wooden beams across the church above the vaults (see Lasteyrie, p. 340, and also Choisy, II, p. 162, Fig. C.), but even if this were one reason, they also materially aided by their downward pressure, in offsetting the outward thrust.

[98] Pointed nave arcade arches were used as early as the eleventh century in Bourgogne in such churches as Farges and Saint Vincent-des-PrÉs (SaÔne-et-Loire); see Lasteyrie, p. 428.

[99] These lie along the line between Bourgogne and Auvergne, and the influence of the latter school may account for the preference shown in them for round headed arches.

[100] See Enlart, I, p. 275.

[101] Azy (Aisne), Chapel. Jouaignes (Aisne), Chapel. See Enlart, I, p. 445, note 1.

[102] Enlart, I, p. 270, Fig. 103, and Porter, I, p. 278.

[103] A few examples are found, among them: Mont Saint Vincent (SaÔne-et-Loire) Ch. (eleventh century), see Enlart, I, p. 272, and Lasteyrie, p. 248; Palognieu (Loire) Ch. (twelfth century), Enlart, I, p. 272, and Michel, I, p. 475; see also Enlart, I, p. 272, for other examples.

[104] Choisy, II, p. 198.

[105] “See also Saintes (Charente-InfÉrieure) Saint Eutrope (Crypt of the twelfth century restored in the thirteenth), Enlart, I, p. 294, Fig. 120 bis; Poitiers, Saint Hilaire (aisles added in the nave), Choisy, II, p. 199, Fig. 9.

[106] See p. 5.

[107] See p. 21.

[108] This was also the original method of vaulting in the aisles of the wooden roofed basilica church of Saint Front at PÉrigueux (cir. 988-991), according to Rivoira, II, p. 113.

[109] Enlart, I, p. 271, Fig. 104, and Michel, I, p. 475, Fig. 236.

[110] Dehio and von Bezold, I, p. 258.

[111] Lasteyrie, p. 249, Fig. 239.

[112] See Lasteyrie, p. 248, and note 3.

[113] Section in Dehio and von Bezold, I, p. 529.

[114] Borrmann and Neuwirth, II, p. 163.

[115] Enlart, I, p. 239.

[116] According to Reber (p. 367), but according to Rivoira (Vol. II, p. 117) they were originally wooden roofed.

[117] Lasteyrie, p. 261, Fig. 251.

[118] Common to many transitional vaulting systems. See Porter, Cons. of Lombard and Gothic Vaults, pp. 12-14.

[119] Viollet-le-Duc, IV, p. 26.

[120] This can be seen by a glance at the transverse arches as shown in Fig. 17.

[121] See Lasteyrie, p. 427. Other examples are: Pontaubert (Yonne) Ch., Enlart, I, p. 277, Figs. 109-110; Gourdon (SaÔne-et-Loire) Ch., Lasteyrie, p. 255, Fig. 246; Toulon-sur-Arroux (SaÔne-et-Loire) Ch. Bragny-en-Charollais (SaÔne-et-Loire) Ch.

[122] The side aisles of La TrinitÉ are shut off from the choir and covered with tunnel vaults, a method which is sometimes found in this school. See Ruprich-Robert, I, p. 61.

[123] Bond, p. 293.

[124] See Lasteyrie, p. 540.

[125] See Enlart, I, p. 445, note 2.

[126] Choisy, II, p. 206, Fig. 14.

[127] See Choisy, II, pp. 220-222.

[128] See Rivoira, II, p. 122.

[129] Dehio and von Bezold, I, p. 414.

[130] See Dehio and von Bezold, I, p. 415.

[131] The abbey church of Laach (begun in 1093 but work neglected somewhat until its resumption in 1112) is an exception, having been planned from the ground for vaulting. This is not of domed-up type, but seems to have been inspired directly by that of VÉzelay. See Rivoira, II, pp. 330-331 and Fig. 781.

[132] See Laach, Abbey Ch. south aisle in Rivoira, II, p. 328, Fig. 777.

[133] Mainz, Speyer, etc.

[134] See Porter, Cons. of Lombard and Gothic Vaults.

[135] Alternate piers, eaves-galleries, etc.

[136] See also Cologne, Saint Maurice (before 1144) Lasteyrie, p. 518; Brauveiller; Guebviller; Rosheim; Schlestadt; Saint Die. See Enlart, I, p. 279, note 2.

[137] Porter, Cons. of Lombard and Gothic Vaults, pp. 20-21.

[138] See aisles of Bernay (Eure), Abbey Ch., Ruprich-Robert, I, p. 61.

[139] Although this arrangement would seem to reflect Lombard influence, the form of the triforia and of the vaults is much more like those of Auvergne.

[140] Illustrated in Bond, p. 293.

[141] Illustrated in Bond, p. 293.

[142] See also the aisles of Bernay choir in Ruprich-Robert, I, p. 61.

[143] In St. Étienne at least. Gloucester cathedral may or may not have been vaulted before the transformation of its interior from Romanesque to Perpendicular Gothic.

[144] See Fig. 63.

[145] See p. 101, 102.

[146] Ruprich-Robert, pl. LXXXVII.

[147] Rivoira, I, p. 225.

[148] Rivoira, I, p. 224, Figs. 330, 331.

[149] Porter, Cons. of Lombard and Gothic Vault.

[150] Porter, Cons. of Lombard and Gothic Vaults, p. 22.

[151] Porter, Cons. of Lombard and Gothic Vaults, p. 23.

[152] See Cattaneo, p. 227.

[153] The word square is used to denote bays which are approximately as well as actually equilateral.

[154] See list in Enlart, I, p. 264 note 2 and note 3. Examples of transverse arches of earlier date exist in Syrian and Early Christian architecture, but not with a regular alternate system.

[155] This was especially important to the Lombard builders, who always preferred the semicircular arch, which could thus be employed for all six ribs of the vault and would cause the crown to be domed up just high enough to permit the construction of the entire vault by means of a simple centering from rib to rib. See Porter, Cons. of Lombard and Gothic Vaults.

[156] See Porter, Cons. of Lombard and Gothic Vaults.

[157] Illustrated in M. H.

[158] Illustrated in Porter, Cons. of Lombard and Gothic Vaults, Fig. 19.

[159] See Porter, Cons. of Lombard and Gothic Vaults, p. 13.

[160] Examples include: Laval (Mayenne), La TrinitÉ; LeMans (Sarthe), La Couture; Poitiers (Vienne), Cath. (portion); Poitiers, Sainte Radegonde; BrantÔme (Dordogne), Ch.; Lucheux (Somme), Ch.; Airaines (Somme), Notre Dame.

[161] They are, perhaps, the earliest of the Anjou group. Enlart (Vol. I, pp. 435, note 1 and 445, note 1) gives an earlier date for Lucheux and Airaines, but the appearance of their vaults does not seem to bear out this assertion.

[162] See Choisy, II, p. 277 and p. 276, Fig. 8—A. B. C.

[163] Enlart, I, p. 437, Fig. 205.

[164] Enlart, I, p. 444, Fig. 210. See also p. 446, note 1.

[165] Lasteyrie, p. 474, Fig. 490.

[166] Ill. in Bond, p. 328, Fig. 4.

[167] See Street, p. 80, and Fig. 7, opp. same.

[168] Examples could be cited in Belgium, Holland, Norway, Spain, etc., in fact, wherever Lombard, Rhenish or Anjou influence was strong.

[169] See also Milan, S. Nazzaro. Cummings, I, p. 116.

[170] Similar building-up of the arches may be seen in the nave at Bury (Fig. 22), and in the narthex of St. Leu d’Esserent (Oise). See Moore, p. 68 and p. 69, Fig. 24.

[171] Very interesting examples occur also at Saint Aignan (Loire-et-Cher), Ch.

[172] Similar angels are found in the porch of Santiago-de-Compostella illustrated in Uhde, Baudenkmaeler in Spainen und Portugal; also in Madrazo-Gurlitt, pl. 166. These latter are Angels of Judgment, forming part of the sculptural scheme of the three portals.

[173] Similar figures also appear at Salamanca, in the old cathedral. See Street, p. 80 and Fig. opp. p. 80. Uhde, op. cit., Fig. 119, p. 50.

[174] See p. 57.

[175] Other examples include: Bologna, San Petronio, ill. in Joseph, p. 172, Fig. 132; Verona, Cath. See Bond, p. 321; Pavia, San Teodoro (1150-1180), see Bond, p. 321; Venice, SS. Giovanni e Paolo, Cummings, II. p. 192.

[176] See also Rivolta d’Adda—Rivoira, I. p 234, Fig. 331; Pavia, S. Michele, Porter, I, ill. 104, opp. p. 204.

[177] See pp. 39 and 42.

[178] Omitting for the present the cathedral of Durham.

[179] These windows like others of the Norman school are actually to one side of the center of the bay but not far enough to make the difference apparent. In fact, they would seem to have been moved over for the purpose of making them appear in the center since the inward curve of the diagonal, which lies on one side of them only, would make them appear to be out of center were they placed on the axis of the bay.

[180] Enlart gives several examples, though not in churches with a regular pier system. Among these are: Cerisy-la-ForÊt (Manche), Enlart, I, p. 261, Fig. 97; Le Mans, N. D. du PrÉ (original state); Villemagne (HÉrault), Saint Gregoire (ruined), see Enlart, I, p. 264, note 2.

[181] Illustrated in Ruprich-Robert, pl. LXXIX.

[182] Ruprich-Robert, pl. LXXVIII.

[183] Ruprich-Robert, pl. LXXXI.

[184] In England, where thick walls are an important factor in vault support even at a comparatively late date, this same form of vaulting conoid is frequently found, for example in Chichester, Cath. (ill. in Moore, Mediaeval Church Architecture of England, p. 110, Fig. 91), Worcester, Cath. choir, (ill. in Moore, Mediaeval Church Architecture of England, pl. XX), Lincoln, Cath., E. Transept (see Moore, Mediaeval Church Architecture of England, p. 116), etc.

[185] Ruprich-Robert, pl. LXXXVIII.

[186] Ruprich-Robert, pl. LXXXVII.

[187] Flying-buttresses had to be added not long after their construction, to keep them from falling.

[188] Even these vaults have suffered from reconstruction in the thirteenth century.

[189] See Moore, p. 130 et seq. for discussion of this point.

[190] A later instance does appear and this, too, on a very large scale in the rebuilt choir vaults of Beauvais cathedral (1284), but the six-part vaults of this church are entirely due to the subdivision of four-part rectangular vaults in order to obtain greater stability.

[191] Among the more important examples not mentioned are: Laon (Aisne), Cath.; Mantes (Seine-et-Oise), Cath.; Dijon (CÔte-d’Or), Notre Dame, etc.

[192] Other examples are: Lincoln, Cath. choir; (Fig. 35) Durham, Cath. east transept; Rochester, Cath. presbytery, (Moore, Mediaeval Church Architecture of England, pl. XVIII), etc.

[193] Porter, Cons. of Lombard and Gothic Vaults, Figs. 58-60.

[194] Other Italian examples are: Casamari, Ch.; San Galgano, Ch.; San Martino, Ch.; etc.

[195] This bay was rebuilt (cir. 1237-1239) after the fall of the tower and is, therefore, later than the transept (cir. 1200).

[196] In La TrinitÉ there are no side aisles, but a series of chapels constitutes virtually the same arrangement.

[197] Lubke, I, p. 440, Fig. 313.

[198] Sturgis, II, p. 435, Fig. 382.

[199] Sturgis, II, p. 439, Fig. 386.

[200] See also one bay of Lincoln choir (Fig. 35) rebuilt cir. 1239, also Bourges, S. Pierre-le-Guillard, early thirteenth century, vaults rebuilt on original lines in the fifteenth century. Nesle (Somme) Ch. also has this vaulting form according to Moore, Mediaeval Church Architecture of England, p. 114, note 1.

[201] See also Erfurt, Frankiskanerkirche.

[202] Gurlitt, pl. 83.

[203] Ex. Voulton (Seine-et-Marne), Ch. Baudot and Perrault-Dabot, I, pl. 62.

[204] Bumpus, illustration opp. p. 92.

[205] Ill. in Moore, p. 51.

[206] See p. 96 and Fig. 44.

[207] Bond, p. 643.

[208] Rivoira, II, pp. 235-243.

[209] Moore, Mediaeval Church Architecture of England, p. 25.

[210] Lasteyrie, p. 497, note 1.

[211] Bond, p. 370.

[212] Bond, pp. 315 and 319.

[213] Bond, p. 319.

[214] The system, moreover, is complete with a transverse arch which might seem to indicate that it was later than that at Durham.

[215] The other three are, the sexpartite and pseudo-sexpartite vaults and the irregular four-part method employed at Durham.

[216] Moore, p. 80, Fig. 32.

[217] Whether these concealed buttresses were first used in Normandy or the Ile-de-France is an open question, but in either case their origin would seem to be traceable to such prototypes as the ramping walls above the transverse aisle arches of such Lombard churches as Sant’ Ambrogio at Milan and perhaps even to Roman monuments like the basilica of Maxentius at Rome. The really important question is to learn when these concealed buttresses were first raised above the aisle roofs to constitute true flying-buttresses. This would seem to have taken place in the Ile-de-France, perhaps at Domont as Porter suggests (Porter, II, pp. 91-92), or at Noyon towards the middle of the twelfth century.

[218] Ill. in Moore, p. 76.

[219] An example of the heavy ribs used in early work may be seen at Morienval, Fig. 77.

[220] These and the following churches are chosen at random merely for the purposes of comparison.

[221] For example in the cathedral of Albi, where the nave is sixty feet in width, and in that of Gerona (Spain), where it is over seventy.

[222] See pp. 49 and 70.

[223] See Bond, p. 336.

[224] See Bond, p. 335.

[225] See Bond, p. 336.

[226] As a matter of fact these in their turn help to support the ridge rib.

[227] See Street, p. 78 for a drawing (from Wilde) of this vault before its restoration.

[228] See p. 93 for examples.

[229] So far as the writer knows there are no examples of the simple transverse ridge rib in England, where one would naturally expect to find it used.

[230] Moreover the tiercerons at Worcester would seem to have been an afterthought. See Moore, Mediaeval Church Architecture of England, p. 175.

[231] Illustrated in Bond, p. 327.

[232] Illustrated in Bond, p. 327. See also Lichfield’s Cath. nave for similar transverse rib.

[233] Not without their influence, however, as a number of late churches could be cited in which there is no true transverse rib, as for example the minster at Berne (Switzerland), (illustrated in Michel, III, p. 52, Fig. 31).

[234] See Bond, p. 333.

[235] Dehio and von Bezold, II, p. 234, Fig. 1.

[236] A larger number of tiercerons is frequently found but not in vaults without liernes, except in very rare instances such as Oxford Schools Tower, where there are three pairs of tiercerons in each severy. Plan in Bond, p. 324-8.

[237] Bond, p. 340.

[238] Illustrated in Bond, p. 329.

[239] Illustrated in Bond, p. 331.

[240] Michel, III, p. 27, Fig. 17.

[241] Illustrated in Bond, p. 329.

[242] Illustrated in Bond, p. 330.

[243] See also illustration in Bond, p. 332.

[244] See illustration of Gloucester choir in Bond, p. 334.

[245] See illustration in Bond, opp. p. 132.

[246] See illustration of Tewkesbury nave, Wells choir (Bond, p. 332) and Gloucester choir (Bond, p. 334).

[247] Illustrated in Bond, p. 330.

[248] Illustrated in Bond, p. 332.

[249] Illustrated in Bond, p. 332.

[250] Illustrated in Bond, p. 333.

[251] Illustrated in Bond, p. 333.

[252] See also Cambridge, King’s College chapel, illustrated in Bond, p. 333.

[253] See also Oxford, Christ Church staircase, illustrated in Bond, p. 348.

[254] Illustrated in Willis, p. 50.

[255] Illustrated in Bond, p. 333.

[256] The vaults are modern but the church was planned to have this type.

[257] Illustrated in Bond, opp. p. 348, also Willis, pl. III, opp. p. 54.

[258] Illustrated in Bond, p. 297. See also Oxford, Divinity School, illustrated in Bond, p. 331 and Henry VII’s Chapel, illustrated in Bond, opp. p. 348.

[259] For an extended discussion of English vaulting see Bond, English Church Architecture, Vol. I, Chap. V, pp. 279-384.

[260] The diagonals of many vaults in France and Spain and especially in England had been decorated with carving, particularly in the early Gothic period.

[261] Illustrated in Michel, IV, p. 858.

[262] Enlart, I, Fig. 318, opp. p. 558.

[263] Lubke, I, p. 540, Fig. 373. See also Freiberg-i-Sachsen, Cath. (Hartung, I, pl. 5).

[264] Plan in Street, pl. IV, opp. p. 104.

[265] Plan in Street, pl. XII, opp. p. 194.

[266] Michel, III, p. 10, Fig. 4.

[267] Michel, III, p. 52, Fig. 31.

[268] Hartung, II, pl. 114.

[269] So far as the writer is aware.

[270] Michel, IV, p. 567, Fig. 376.

[271] Enlart, I, pp. 598-599, Fig. 323.

[272] Enlart, I, pp. 676-677, Fig. 345. See also Bristol cathedral, Berkeley Chapel (cir. 1340) illustrated in Bond, p. 329.

[273] See Dehio and von Bezold, II, p. 82.

[274] Perhaps as early as between 1124-1140 when there was a reconstruction of the cathedral. The character of their construction certainly would not be inconsistent with such a date.

[275] Ribs rising in a somewhat similar manner are to be found in the south of France, in the crypt of the church of Saint Gilles (Gard.) (Ill. in Lasteyrie, p. 263, Fig. 253) or the chapel of the Pont Saint-Benezet at Avignon (Vaucluse), where they mark the intersection of two flattened tunnel vaults.

[276] Lincoln, Cath. nave aisle. Plan in Bond, pp. 308-9; Salisbury, Cath.; Southwell, Minster.

[277] Hartung, I, pl. 16.

[278] Illustrated in Bond, p. 329.

[279] Examples include: LinkÖping, Cath.; Paderborn, Cath.; Minden, Cath.; Mainz, S. Stephen; Landshut, Saint Martin; Prenzlau, Marienkirche; Heidelberg, Peterskirche; Paris, Sainte Chapelle (lower church); Chaumont, Ch.; Perugia, Cath.; Winchester, Cath. (Lady chapel); Belem (Portugal) Ab. Ch.; Barcelona, Cath.; Freiberg-i-Sachsen, Cath. (1494-1501); Hartung, I, pl. 5; Soest, Sta Maria zur Wiese, Hartung, I, pl. 49; Stendal, S. Maria (cir. 1450), Hartung, II, pl. 69.

[280] Hartung, III, pl. 126.

[281] Illustration in Lubke, I, p. 540, Fig. 373.

[282] See Butler, p. 78.

[283] See Lasteyrie, p. 480 and notes 1-2.

[284] From its elevation, this would seem to have been added later.

[285] Other examples include: Issoire, Saint Paul, and the churches at Saint Saturnin and Saint Nectaire (Puy-de-DÔme).

[286] Illustrated in Lasteyrie, p. 445, Fig. 463.

[287] Illustrated in Enlart, I, Fig. 318, opp. p. 588.

[288] Saint Jean-au-Bois (Oise) (twelfth century); Épinal (Vosges) (thirteenth century); Valentigny and Vendeuvre (Aube); Roberval, Vauciennes, and Verberie (Oise); Brunembert (Pas-de-Calais); etc.

[289] See p. 131, note 16 for explanation of the use of the word chevet.

[290] See also Tour (Calvados), Ch. Illustrated in Dehio and von Bezold, II, p. 187. Rys (Calvados), Ch. Baudot and Perrault-Dabot II, pl. 12; Omonville-la-Rogue, Ch. Baudot and Perrault-Dabot, II, pl. 46; Puiseaux (Loiret), Ch. Baudot and Perrault-Dabot, III, pl. 28.

[291] Hartung, III, pl. 134.

[292] There is a similar vault in the transept.

[293] Among them: LÉrins, Chapelle de la TrinitÉ. Illustrated in Revoil I, pl. 1; St. Martin-de-Londres, Ch. Revoil, I, pl. XXXIII.

[294] For example: Querqueville (Manche).

[295] See Lasteyrie, p. 530.

[296] An earlier transept with similar vaulting may have existed in church of St. Lucien at Beauvais (1090-1109), but this church was unfortunately destroyed during the Revolution. See Enlart, I, p. 480, note 3.

[297] Similar transepts at Breslau, Heiligekreuze; Paderborn, Cath.; Marburg, St. Elizabeth.

[298] The development and construction of chevet vaults is discussed in Chapter III.

[299] Apparently later than the chevet.

[300] See Enlart, I, p. 490 note 3 and Lasteyrie, pp. 285 and 522 for lists. Also NeufchÂtel (Seine InfÉrieure) fifteenth century. Porter, II, p. 95.

[301] Plan in Gurlitt, p. 22.

[302] See Enlart, I, p. 480 note 3 and Lasteyrie, pp. 285 and 522 for further examples.

[303] In rare instances, as in Saint Hilaire at Poitiers, there are aisles along the west wall only, but this is due to a rebuilding of the church.

[304] Toulouse, Saint Sernin; Reims, Saint Remi (originally) (see Lasteyrie, p. 282); Winchester, Cath. (1079-1093) (Rivoira, II, p. 205). Tribunes are also to be seen in churches without a triforium gallery along the transept walls as for example in Saint Georges-de-Boscherville, Cerisy-la-ForÊt (1030-1066), etc. See list in Enlart, I, p. 236, note 1.

[305] See Lasteyrie, p. 539 and Enlart, I, p. 265, note 1.

[306] See Ruprich-Robert, II, p. 3.

[307] Lasteyrie, p. 271, Fig. 264.

[308] For other examples see Lasteyrie, p. 335, notes 3-4-5.

[309] Lasteyrie, p. 336, Fig. 359.

[310] See Lasteyrie, p. 270.

[311] See Enlart, I, pp. 123, 124.

[312] See Rivoira, II, pp. 27, 29.

[313] Lasteyrie, p. 445, Fig. 463.

[314] Lasteyrie, p. 316, Fig. 338.

[315] See p. 106.

[316] Lasteyrie, p. 249, Fig. 239.

[317] Lasteyrie, p. 336, Fig. 359.

[318] See also Marseilles,—La Major.

[319] See p. 124.

[320] Either with or without a lantern beneath them. Examples: Montagne (Gironde); Nantille, Notre Dame; Saumur, St. Pierre. See Michel, II, p. 108 and Lasteyrie, p. 479.

[321] See also such other buildings as the ChÂteau de Simiane (Basses-Alpes) (apparently twelfth century). Illustrated in Revoil, III, pl. VIII.

[322] See p. 125.

[323] Similar domes may be seen in the old cathedral of Salamanca (finished before 1178). (Moore, Character of Renaissance Architecture, p. 57, Fig. 28.) [Street, (Fig. 7, op. p. 80) shows this dome as having flat severies, and does not mention the fact that they are curved, as he takes pains to do in regard to Zamora]; and the collegiate church at Toro (begun cir. 1160-1170, finished in thirteenth century), (Michel, II, p. 108, Fig. 76). It is difficult to tell from the photograph whether this last example has the lobed vault surface.

[324] Illustrated in Simpson, II, p. 104.

[325] There is an earlier and somewhat similar crossing vault in the church of S. Marien at Gelnhausen (1225-on) Hartung, III, pl. 145.

[326] Michel, IV, p. 829, Fig. 546.

[327] Michel, IV, p. 828, Fig. 545.

[328] It is possible that this vault is of wood.

[329] Simpson, II, Fig. 68, opp. p. 104.

[330] Simpson, II, Fig. 69, opp. p. 164.

[331] Examples are furnished by: Florence, S. M. Novella; Sens, Cath. (Fig. 28); Paris, N. D.; Soissons, Cath.; Cologne, Cath.; to cite but a few churches.

[332] Cummings, II, p. 141, Fig. 330.

[333] Cummings, II, p. 149, Fig. 335.

[334] For example in Dol, Cath.; Étampes, Saint Gilles; Bayeux, Cath., etc.

[335] For example in Angers, Cath. (Fig. 19); Bordeaux, Saint Michel, etc.

[336] Numerous illustrations may be found in Bond, Gothic Architecture in England and English Church Architecture.

[337] Most of the vaulting is modern but built as originally planned.

[338] An example of this arrangement may be seen at Saint Nicolas-du-Port (Meurthe-et-Moselle). Enlart, Fig. 318, opp. p. 588.

[339] See also Poitiers, Saint Hilaire (Fig. 7) and Notre Dame-la-Grande, etc.

[340] See also Toulouse, Saint Sernin; Saint BenoÎt-sur-Loire (Fig. 13); and Nevers, St. Étienne, etc.

[341] They may have been inspired by the salient arches of such a tunnel vault as that in the Temple of Diana at NÎmes, and in any event would seem to owe their origin to classic prototypes and to be largely decorative, a theory which is strengthened by the appearance of such a vault as that in the little church of Saint Jean-de-Moustier, at Arles (probably of the ninth century) (Revoil, I, pl. XVI), where these radiants very closely resemble Corinthian pilasters.

[342] Dartein, pl. 76.

[343] Porter, Cons. of Lombard and Gothic Vaults, Fig. 62. There are also a number of churches of the more developed period in which somewhat similar ribbed half domes are found, though these are frequently laid up in flat gores over polygonal apses. Examples include: Worms, Cath.; west apse, see Fig. 58; Florence, Cath. east and transept apses.

[344] Madrazo-Gurlitt, pl. 178.

[345] Examples include Berzy-le-Sec and Laffaux (Aisne); Chelles (Oise) and Bonnes (Vienne) all dating cir. 1140-1150; BruyÈres, and Vauxrezis (Aisne) probably of about the same date, and Torcy (Aisne) dating from the second half of the twelfth century; Étampes, St. Martin, radiating chapel. All of these are illustrated in Lefevre-Pontalis. Examples with three ribs include Thor (Vaucluse) and Saint Pierre-de-Reddes (HÉrault), both illustrated in Revoil. Example with four ribs, Como, Sant’ Abondio. Example with five ribs, Montmajour (Bouches-du-RhÔne), Ab. Ch. Revoil, II, pl. XXXI. For further examples, see Porter, II, p. 78.

[346] For instance, at Vieil-Arcy, Ch. (Lefevre-Pontalis, pl. XLV), where there are no ribs beneath the half dome; and in the last five churches with two ribs listed in the preceding note.

[347] Lasteyrie, p. 450, Fig. 470.

[348] Rivoira, II, p. 38, Fig. 399.

[349] Rivoira, II, pp. 39-40.

[350] Rivoira, II, p. 93.

[351] Moore, Mediaeval Church Architecture of England, p. 15, Fig. 11.

[352] Forest-l’Abbaye (Somme) (plan in Enlart, I, p. 447, Fig. 211) furnishes one example of this and others are listed in Enlart, I, p. 447 and note 2 at the foot of that page.

[353] There are occasionally to be found some late examples showing the survival of the half dome as an apse vault, but these are exceptional after cir. 1150, until the Renaissance period.

[354] The word chevet is used here and elsewhere as referring to the ribbed vaulting developed and applied to the apse of the Gothic churches.

[355] See p. 128, 129.

[356] See p. 110.

[357] Lefevre-Pontalis, pl. XXIX.

[358] Lefevre-Pontalis, pl. LI.

[359] At Laon the remaining bays of the chapel are groined and if their vaults are original, this presents one of the few examples of a church completely groined and especially of one with the combination of groined vault and ribbed chevet.

[360] Moore, Mediaeval Church Architecture of England, pl. 1, opp. p. 19. Variously dated 1130-1150.

[361] Illustrated in Moore, pp. 72 and 73, Figs. 26, 27.

[362] See Moore, p. 130, et seq., and Porter, II, p. 80.

[363] See also the apses of Saint Étienne at Caen, of Saint Martin-des-Champs at Paris and of Soissons cathedral transept. Other churches were probably originally designed without the flying-buttresses, among them Saint Remi at Reims. See Porter, II, p. 209 (from Lefevre-Pontalis).

[364] This type of vault is later discussed. See p. 153.

[365] The chevet vault is chosen for this discussion merely because the photographs are handy for reference. Similar vaults could, however, be found in all the other portions of the church.

[366] For example, in Soissons transept. In certain other examples, the formeret does not follow the vault curve. See Paris, St. Martin-des-Champs (Fig. 65), Noyon transept, etc.

[367] A vault of similar character may be noted in the name of Amiens and numerous other instances could be cited outside of the chevet vaults.

[368] The eastern bay in this particular church was widened to give a broad opening into the Lady chapel.

[369] It may be noted that La Madeleine also resembles St. Germer in having a groined triforium.

[370] Vaults with just such doming were to be used side by side with those with higher window cells, as is later shown.

[371] Unfortunately the vaults of Sens and Noyon have been rebuilt though apparently in the original manner, while those of Senlis, which would have been of much value, have been reconstructed in a later style.

[372] Examples include: Bologna, San Francesco; Auxerre Cath. (planned for six-part type of vaults), etc.

[373] Other examples not mentioned include Albi (Tarn) cath.; Troyes (Aube) cath.; Semur-en-Auxois (CÔte-d’or), Notre Dame.

[374] It is possible that it owes this arrangement to the church of Saint Remi (Fig. 64).

[375] Although not originally planned for four-part vaults in the choir, its present arrangement illustrates the combination referred to.

[376] This is not a noticeable fault with sexpartite choir vaulting since the crowns of all the window cells form similar angles.

[377] Porter, II, p. 83, Fig. 176.

[378] In referring to chevet vaults, the terms three-celled, four-celled, etc., refer to the number of window panels or severies, while the terms four-part, five-part, etc., refer to the total number of severies in the vault, generally one more than the number of window cells.

[379] See also the five-part chevet in the cathedral of Saint Louis at Blois (Loire-et-Cher) which is, however, of much later date.

[380] This may explain the fact that the buttressing rib type of chevet persisted side by side with this fourth form.

[381] In St. Étienne this rib would seem to be an addition to the original chevet.

[382] Street, pl. XXV. op. p. 408.

[383] Bond, p. 63.

[384] This church has a rather exceptional chevet in that it is considerably more than a semicircle in plan.

[385] Plan in Street, pl. XVI, opp. p. 306.

[386] The double apse of the Chapel of the Seminaire at Bayeux (thirteenth century) (Baudot and Perrault-Dabot, II, pl. 44) has two chevets of similar character.

[387] Plan in Caumont, p. 590.

[388] See the illustration in Bond, p. 165.

[389] See also Pirna, Hauptkirche (1502-1546), Hartung, I, pl. 57.

[390] See also Le Mans, Notre Dame-de-la-Couture: Padua, Sant’ Antonio.

[391] And sometimes in churches where this arrangement is not found.

[392] See also Neubourg (Eure). Plan in Enlart, I, Fig. 317.

[393] Baudot and Perrault-Dabot, I, pl. 46.

[394] See Fig. 31.

[395] The vault has been recently reconstructed along original lines.

[396] A feature which certainly enhances the present appearance of the cathedral, though it is quite possible that the builders originally intended to shut off this vista by a high reredos behind the altar.

[397] Compare for example the chevet of Reims with that of Saint Urbain.

[398] Needless to say, no flying-buttresses are necessary with such a vault as the thrusts are easily absorbed by the piers.

[399] Similar openings are to be seen in the apse of Saint Nazaire at Carcassonne.

[400] For other examples showing the employment of this feature even in the Renaissance see Enlart, I, p. 506, note 2.

[401] Hartung, I, pl. 15.

[402] For a discussion of this point see E. Gall’s series of articles on the ambulatory in Monatschefte fur Kunstwissenschaft, beginning with the fifth volume, 1912, pp. 134-149.

[403] See Rivoira I, p. 184.

[404] Now destroyed. See Rivoira I, p. 184.

[405] Some examples of the walled off ambulatory are found, however. See Enlart, I, p. 234, note 5.

[406] See Rivoira, I, p. 183, for dates of Santo Stefano and Ivrea.

[407] An annular tunnel vault also covered the passage around the tribune of the so-called stadium of Domitian already mentioned. See Rivoira, I, p. 184.

[408] For other examples, see Enlart, I, p. 266, note 6. A similar vault is sometimes found in the aisles of circular churches, as for example in Ste. Croix at QuimperlÉ (eleventh century). Baudot and Perrault-Dabot, II, pl. 5.

[409] See Rivoira, II, p. 289.

[410] At intervals this vault is cut by lunettes or groined bays but it is fundamentally an annular tunnel vault.

[411] Exactly as has been suggested in regard to similar side aisle vaults.

[412] See Enlart, I, p. 266, note 6.

[413] Enlart, I, p. 34, Fig. 14.

[414] Revoil, I, pl. XLVIII.

[415] Baudot and Perrault-Dabot, II, pl. 25.

[416] Rivoira, II, p. 270, Fig. 718.

[417] See Rivoira, II, p. 8. See also the Duomo Vecchio at Brescia (Porter, Cons. of Lombard and Gothic Vaults, Fig. 49).

[418] Porter, Cons. of Lombard and Gothic Vaults, Fig. 53.

[419] Porter, Cons. of Lombard and Gothic Vaults, Fig. 52.

[420] Enlart, I, p. 273, Fig. 105.

[421] The date of this cathedral is uncertain and the exceptional character of its triforium leads to the suspicion that it may not now retain its original arrangement, though the writer has no proof of this suggestion.

[422] In some instances these lintels have been cut through with an arch running up into the surface of the vault between the bays.

[423] Previous to Porter there had been suggestions of this origin of the ribbed vault in Choisy’s work and in Rivoira’s Lombardic architecture, but their studies had been largely confined to vaults whose ribs were sunken into the masonry panels.

[424] See discussion of this point on p. 136.

[425] See p. 53, 54.

[426] Plan in Rivoira, I, p. 222, Fig. 327.

[427] If Signor Rivoira is correct in his attribution of this ambulatory to the third quarter of the eleventh century (Rivoira, I, pp. 222, 223), it affords not only an extremely early example of the straight ribbed type but an instance of a ribbed vaulted ambulatory of large size antedating that at Morienval by half a century. I am not prepared to accept this early date. The general elevation of the piers and ribs, the geographical situation of the church, the lack of any similarly vaulted ambulatories in the fifty years following its construction and the very form of the vaults, which may easily have once been of the groined type to be seen in the gallery of Santo Stefano at Verona with ribs added at a later date or reconstruction (note lower imposts of diagonal ribs and expanding soffits of transverse arches like those at Verona) together with many other details a discussion of which the limits of this paper forbids, make it seem most improbable that this ambulatory dates from 1049-1078. As a matter of fact, the date is of little importance in the present connection, since it is the type of vault employed with which this study is largely concerned.

[428] Plan and interior view in Moore, pp. 72, 73, Figs. 26, 27.

[429] Plan in Moore, p. 83, Fig. 34.

[430] This may be plainly seen at the cathedral of Tournai (Fig. 85).

[431] Moore, Mediaeval Church Architecture of England, p. 96, Fig. 82 and pl. XV, opp. p. 104.

[432] Crypt illustrated in Moore, Mediaeval Church Architecture of England, p. 94, Fig. 80, Trinity chapel, p. 103 Fig. 86 and pi. XIV. opp. same page.

[433] See Moore, Mediaeval Church Architecture of England, pp. 94-95.

[434] See p. 99 for theory regarding this.

[435] Moore, Mediaeval Church Architecture of England, pl. XV, opp. p. 104.

[436] Moore, Mediaeval Church Architecture of England, pl. XIV, opp. p. 103.

[437] Ambulatories vaulted in a similar manner appear in Saint Sauveur at Bruges, the Groote Kerk at Breda, the cathedral of Burgos, the church at Gonesse (Seine-et-Oise) (plan in Enlart, I, p. 486, Fig. 233) etc. Also, in Magdeburg Cath. (Hartung I, pl. 16), there is an instance in which the intermediate rib is shortened evidently to admit the greatest possible amount of light.

[438] This is also a church employing the lancet type of window common in Normandy and England and the subdivision of the ambulatory thus made possible windows of general lancet shape. Furthermore, it carried the subdivision of the triforium arcade into the clerestory above. (For a large photograph of this ambulatory see Gurlitt, pl. 84).

[439] Plan in Moore, p. 83, Fig. 34.

[440] Similar vaults appear at Coutances Cath., outer ambulatory, Utrecht Cath. (ridge ribs added), Malmo, Ch., and Lagny, Ab. Ch. (illustrated in Lenoir, part II, p. 207).

[441] Plan in Enlart, I, p. 505, Fig. 244.

[442] Violet-le-Duc (Vol. IV, pp. 75-77) calls attention to the architectural refinements in this church, mentioning the use of arches flattened on their inner face and curved on the outer between the apse and triforium. It is also interesting to note that here as in Saint Remi the vault of the triforium differs from that of the ambulatory proper. The arrangement at Saint Remi has been described, that at Chalons consists of a simple four-part vault of trapezoidal form with outer and inner sides curved.

[443] Examples at Strassburg, Cath., Neubourg (Eure), ch. (irregular type of ch. with central pier and triangular apse. See plan in Enlart, I, p. 590, Fig. 317) and Tewkesbury Abbey (here even the triangular bays open into chapels). See also ClÉry (Loiret) (fifteenth century) (plan in Baudot and Perrault-Dabot, III, pl. 60).

[444] Plan in Caumont, p. 396.

[445] Examples not mentioned include, Beeskow; Keisheim; Stargarde, Johanniskirche (slightly elaborated); Treptow (considerably elaborated); Worms, Liebfrauenkirche; Arles, Saint Trophime, etc.

[446] Plan in Gaudet, III, p. 247, Fig. 1108.

[447] Plan in Gaudet, III, p. 240, Fig. 1104.

[448] These two churches not only show the vault with simple added ribs but the last named is most interesting as showing an ambulatory equal in height to the apse, a most unusual arrangement.

[449] This church also presents certain changes in the arrangement of the ribs but these are unimportant.

[450] See also Kuttenberg.

[451] A similar plan on a smaller scale and with only two side chapels occurs at Ville-neuve-le-Comte (Seine-et-Marne) (plan in Enlart, I, p. 485, Fig. 232) and the same arrangement in churches with central plan appears at Trier in the Liebfrauenkirche while other examples include Lisseweghe; Toul, Saint Gengoulf; Xant; Oppenheim; Ludinghausen; Anclam; LÜbeck, Saint Jakob; Lagny (Seine-et-Marne) (illustrated in Lenoir, Part II, p. 207) and Kaschau (Hungary) (illustrated in Lenoir, Part II, p. 208). See also Enlart, I, p. 485, note 2.

[452] Baudot and Perrault-Dabot, V, pl. 79.

[453] Such chapels were frequently omitted all through both the Romanesque and Gothic periods even in churches with an ambulatory and were not therefore established parts of the church plan. For examples of such chapels see Enlart, I, p. 228 note 2 and p. 485 note 3 and Lasteyrie, p. 297.

[454] For discussion of prototypes see Lasteyrie, pp. 187, 188.

[455] For examples see Lasteyrie, p. 301 and Enlart, I, p. 231, note 4.

[456] For examples see Lasteyrie, p. 301 and Enlart, I, p. 486, note 1.

[457] See Enlart, I, p. 231, note 2.

[458] For examples see Lasteyrie, p. 297, and Enlart I, p. 233, note 1 and p. 486, note 3.

[459] For examples see Lasteyrie, p. 297, and Enlart, I, p. 233, note 2.

[460] For examples see Lasteyrie, p. 297, and Enlart, I, p. 233, note 3.

[461] Orcival (Lasteyrie, p. 297, Fig. 458).

[462] For examples see Enlart, I, p. 233, note 3.

[463] Rather rare in the Romanesque period. For examples see Enlart, I, p. 232.

[464] See page 173 et seq.

[465] For examples of square chapels see Enlart, I, p. 231, note 2 and p. 487, note 7.

[466] For example, the chapels with other chapels added to them toward the east at Norwich cath. and Mehun-sur-Yevre (Cher) see Enlart, I, p. 234, note 4.

[467] See p. 112.

Clyx.com