I. St. Paul
II. Q
III. St. Mark's Gospel
IV. Acts
V. The Epistle to the Hebrews
VI. The Fourth Gospel
VII. The Pastoral and the Catholic Epistles and the Apocalypse
VIII. Summary
I. Narratives and Passages Said to be Inconsistent With the View
II. The Passage Lk. i. 34 f
III. Summary and Conclusion
I. Lk. i. 34 f. and the Textual Question
II. Linguistic and Stylistic Examination of Lk. i. 34 f
III. Summary and Conclusion (2)
I. A Suggested Theory
II. Literary Conditions Under Which the Gospels Were Written
III. The Objections to Which the Above Theory is Exposed
IV. Certain Consequences
I. The Characteristics of the Genealogy
II. The Genuineness of Mt. i, ii
III. The Unity of Mt. i, ii
IV. Implications, Sources, and Results
Appendix To Chapter V. The Textual Problem of Mt. i. 16
I. The Virgin Birth in the First and Third Gospels
II. The Date of the Gospels in Relation to the Virgin Birth Tradition
III. The Relation of the Question of the Historical Value of the Gospels to the Problem
IV. The Question of Alternative Theories
V. Doctrinal Considerations
Section 1.
Section 2.
Section 3.
Section 4.
Section 5.
The Historical Evidence for the Virgin Birth
by Vincent Taylor, B.D. (Lond.)
Clarendon Press
Oxford
1920