| INTRODUCTION |
| PAGE |
| I. Textual— |
| Kant’s Method of composing the Critique of Pure Reason | xix |
| II. Historical— |
| Kant’s Relation to Hume and to Leibniz | xxv |
| III. General— |
| 1. The Nature of the a priori | xxxiii |
| 2. Kant’s Contribution to the Science of Logic | xxxvi |
| 3. The Nature of Consciousness | xxxix |
| 4. Phenomenalism, Kant’s Substitute for Subjectivism | xlv |
| 5. The Distinction between Human and Animal Intelligence | xlvii |
| 6. The Nature and Conditions of Self-Consciousness | l |
| 7. Kant’s threefold Distinction between Sensibility, Understanding, and Reason | lii |
| 8. The place of the Critique of Pure Reason in Kant’s Philosophical System | lv |
| THE CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON[1] |
| Title | 1 |
| Motto | 4 |
| Dedication to Freiherr von Zedlitz | 6 |
| Preface To the First Edition | 8 |
| Comment on Preface | 10 |
| Dogmatism, Scepticism, Criticism | 13 |
| Preface To the Second Edition | 17 |
| The Copernican Hypothesis | 22 |
| Introduction | 26 |
| Comment upon the Argument of Kant’s Introduction | 33 |
| How are Synthetic a priori Judgments possible? | 43 |
| The Analytic and Synthetic Methods | 44 |
| Purpose and Scope of the Critique | 56 |
| Kant’s relation to Hume | 61 |
| Meaning of the term Transcendental | 73 |
| The Transcendental Doctrine of Elements |
| Part I. The Transcendental Aesthetic | 79-166 |
| Definition of Terms | 79 |
| Kant’s conflicting Views of Space | 88 |
| Section I. Space | 99 |
| Kant’s Attitude to the Problems of Modern Geometry | 117 |
| Section II. Time | 123 |
| Kant’s Views regarding the Nature of Arithmetical Science | 128 |
| Kant’s conflicting Views of Time | 134 |
| General Observations on the Transcendental Aesthetic | 143 |
| 519 |
| Concluding Comment on Kant’s Doctrine of the Antinomies | 519 |
| Chapter III. The Ideal of Pure Reason | 522 |
| Section I. and II. The Transcendental Ideal | 522 |
| Comment on Kant’s Method of Argument | 524 |
| Section III. The Speculative Arguments in Proof of the Existence of a Supreme Being | 525 |
| Section IV. The Impossibility of an Ontological Proof | 527 |
| Comment on Kant’s Method of Argument | 528 |
| Section V. The Impossibility of a Cosmological Proof of the Existence of God | 531 |
| Comment on Kant’s Method of Argument | 533 |
| Discovery and Explanation of the Transcendental Illusion in all Transcendental Proof of the Existence of a necessary Being | 534 |
| Comment on Kant’s Method of Argument | 535 |
| Section VI. The Impossibility of the Physico-Theological Proof | 538 |
| Section VII. Criticism of all Theology based on speculative Principles of Reason | 541 |
| Concluding Comment | 541 |
| Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic | 543 |
| The Regulative Employment of the Ideas of Pure Reason | 543 |
| Hypotheses not permissible in Philosophy | 543 |
| On the Final Purpose of the Natural Dialectic of Human Reason | 552 |
| Concluding Comment on the Dialectic | 558 |
| Appendix A. |
| The Transcendental Doctrine of Methods | 563 |
| Chapter I. The Discipline of Pure Reason | 563 |
| Section I. The Discipline of Pure Reason in its Dogmatic Employment | 563 |
| Section II. The Discipline of Pure Reason in its Polemical Employment | 567 |
| Section III. The Discipline of Pure Reason in regard to Hypotheses | 568 |
| Section IV. The Discipline of Pure Reason in regard to its Proofs | 568 |
| Chapter II. The Canon of Pure Reason | 569 |
| Section I. The Ultimate End of the Pure Use of our Reason | 569 |
| Section II. The Ideal of the Highest Good, as a Determining Ground of the Ultimate End of Pure Reason | 570 |
| Section III. Opining, Knowing, and Believing | 576 |
| Chapter III. The Architectonic of Pure Reason | 579 |
| Chapter IV. The History of Pure Reason | 582 |
| Appendix B. |
| A more detailed Statement of Kant’s Relations to his Philosophical Predecessors | 583 |
| Index: A, B In all references to the Kritik der Reinen Vernunft I have given the original pagings of both the first and second editions. References to Kant’s other works are, whenever possible, to the volumes thus far issued in the new Berlin edition. As the Reflexionen Kants zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft had not been published in this edition at the time when the Commentary was completed, the numbering given is that of B. Erdmann’s edition of 1884.
|
