INDEX

Previous
14.htm.html#Page_402" class="pginternal">402-406
  • Compassion, 262, 371
  • Conditional prescriptions (Hypothetical Imperatives), 6, 7
  • Conjugal relation, the duties relating to it, 254, 255, 256, 255 notes 1 and 2, 347, 348, 348 note 1
  • Conscience, popular view of, 99;
  • jural view of, 100-101
  • Conscience (Moral Faculty) and Benevolence, Butler’s view of the relation between, 86, 86 note 2;
  • and Self-love, Butler’s view of relation between, 119, 120, 200, 200 note 2, 327 note 1, 366
  • Conscious Utilitarianism rather the adult than the germinal form of morality, 455-457
  • Consciousness not normally without pleasure or pain, 125
  • Consequences of actions, ulterior, 96, 97;
  • may be judged desirable without reference to pleasure or pain, 97
  • Contract, claims arising from, 269;
  • and Freedom, 276, 276 note 1
  • Courage, 332-334;
  • defined, 332;
  • Greek view of, 456;
  • and Fortitude, are subordinate duties, 332, 333;
  • Moral, 333 note 3;
  • Virtue of, 313, 333, 334;
  • and Foolhardiness, distinguished by Utilitarian considerations, 334, 355
  • Courtesy, 253
  • Cudworth, 103 Note
  • Culture, 157, etc.
  • Cumberland, 86, 86 note 1, 104;
  • and Utilitarianism, 423, 423 note 1
  • Custom, alterations in, 247
  • Decision, 236, 237
  • Deductive Hedonism, 176-195
  • Descartes, 338, 339
  • Desert—Good, how determined, 284-290;
  • Ill, how determined, 291-292;
  • requital of, as principle of Ideal Justice, 280, 281, 283, 294, 349;
  • and 46743-h@46743-h-7.htm.html#Page_177" class="pginternal">177 note 1;
  • and geometry, analogy between, 18-19;
  • and astronomy, analogy between, 19;
  • concerned with Duty under present conditions, 19;
  • aim of, 40, 77;
  • and Rational or Natural Theology, 504-506;
  • mutual relations of the three Methods of, 496-509
  • Ethics and Politics (cf. Law), 15-22 passim, 266, 457;
  • distinguished from Positive sciences, 1, 2;
  • Utilitarian, 457 (cf. 274, 298);
  • in an ideal society, 18 seq.
  • ?????????? (= Well-being = the Good attainable in human life), 91, 92;
  • misunderstanding of Aristotle’s use of, 92 note 2
  • Excellence (cf. Perfection)
  • ‘Excellence’ and ‘Perfection,’ 10 note 3
  • Excellence beyond strict duty, Utilitarian attitude towards, 492, 493
  • Explanation essentially different from Justification, 2
  • Fame, 9, 155, 157, 159, 368, (Posthumous) 156 note 1
  • Feeling—preferableness of, other than pleasantness, dependent on objective relations of the feeling mind, 127, 128, 399;
  • qu feeling, can only be judged by the person who feels, 128, 129, 398
  • Fidelity (cf. Good Faith), 258, 259
  • Firmness, 235, 236
  • Fitness and Desert, 350
  • ‘Formal’ and ‘Material’ Rightness, 206-207, 206 note 1
  • Fortitude defined, 332
  • Free choice as virtuous, 504 note 1
  • Freedom—sentiment of, 39;
  • as absolute end of ideal law, 274 seq., 293, 297, 350-351;
  • sphere of, must be limited, 275;
  • ambiguity of, 275, 276, 293;
  • and Contract, 276, 276 note 1;
  • and Property, 276, 277;
  • Civil and Constitutional, 103;
  • a variety of, constituted by substituting for ‘right’ the notion ‘good,’ 105-107;
  • Æsthetic, 228, 392;
  • Jural or Rational, 228-229
  • Intuitive’ or ‘a priori’ Morality generally used to mean Dogmatic Intuitionism or Morality of Common Sense, 101-102
  • Irrational choice—sometimes conscious and deliberate, 36, 37-38, 41-42, 58, 59, 110;
  • Socratic and Aristotelian view compared with modern view of, 59 note 1
  • Jural method of Ethics, 100-101
  • Just claims—arising from contract, 269;
  • arising from natural and normal expectations, 269, 270, 270 note 1
  • ‘Justice,’ ‘justify,’ etc., uses of, 264 note 2, 270, 286, 442
  • Justice, 20, 99, 264-294 passim, 349-352, 355, 440-448 passim;
  • or Equity, essence of, 496;
  • specially difficult to define, 264;
  • intuitional view of the definition of, 264;
  • involves notion of distribution, 265, 266, 268, 271;
  • and Law, connexion between, 265, 266, 267 note 1;
  • distinct from Order (or Law-observance), 265;
  • and Equality, 266, 267, 267 note 1, 268, 268 note 1, 279, 285 note 1;
  • and taxation, 266, 266 note 1;
  • Conservative and Ideal, 272-273, 273 note 1, 274, 293, 294;
  • Ideal, 273, 274, 293, 294, 444, 445;
  • Ideal, and Natural Eights, 274, 275;
  • Ideal, and Freedom, 278, 279;
  • Corrective, 60, 61, 201-202, 202 note 1, 222, 362, 364;
  • (or Practical) Reason, 33-34, 34 notes 1, 2, 3; 39, 40, 100 seq.;
  • Sense, 34;
  • Reasoning, the most natural type of, 6, 12 seq., 102-103, 493-494;
  • Sentiment, 26-28, 77;
  • Sentiments, (a) difficulties of admitting or rejecting them as motives, 365-367, (b) theory of their derivation from experiences of pleasure and pain, 461, 462;
  • and Quasi-moral Sentiments, 28, 173, 174;
  • Motive, 77, 204 seq., 223;
  • Motive, varying forms of:—(a) Reverence for Authority, (b) Religious Sentiment, (c) Self-respect, (d) sentiment of Freedom, (e) Admiration or Aspiration, 39-40;
  • instincts and crude Utilitarian reasonings—discrepancy between, 466, 467;
  • Intuitions, 211-216 passim;
  • Intuitions, existence of, 211, 212, 337;
  • Intuitions, connexion between (a) Existence and Origin of, 211, 212, (b) Origin and Validity of, 34 note 1, 212-213, 212 note 2, 214;
  • Intuitions, Particular and General, 99-102, 214-216;
  • Rules, imperative and indicative forms of, 101 note 1;
  • Rules and Axioms, importance of, 229;
  • Axioms, abstract but significant, 379-384, 505;
  • Axioms, Kant’s view of, 385-386, 386 notes 1 and 2;
  • Maxims, 337-361 passim;
  • Maxims which are, and which are not, directly self-evident, distinction between, 383;
  • Responsibility, 59-60;
  • Obligation, 217;
  • and non-moral excellence distinguished, 426, 427
  • ‘Moral’ (in narrower sense) and ‘Prudential’ distinguished, 25-26
  • Moral Courage, 333 note 3
  • Moral Philosophy, some problems of modern, 374
  • Morality—‘inductive’ and ‘intuitive,’ double ambiguity of antithesis between, 97-99;
  • a priori and a posteriori (or inductive and intuitive), 419;
  • of ordinary moral rules is often required and given, 419
  • Proof of Utilitarianism, 418-422 passim;
  • clear demand of common sense for, 418, 419;
  • addressed to Egoism, 420, 421, 497-498;
  • addressed to Intuitionism, twofold character of, 421, 422
  • “Proof” of Utilitarian principle, Mill’s, 387, 388
  • Property and Right of Bequest, 277
  • Prudence (or Forethought), 7, 36, 96, 391;
  • common sense view of, 327, 328;
  • Kant’s and Butler’s views of, 327 note 1;
  • self-evident maxim of impartiality educible from the rule of, 381;
  • and Benevolence, subordination of other virtues to, 496-497
  • ‘Prudential’ and ‘Moral,’ 25-26
  • Psychological Hedonism, 40 seq.;
  • of Bentham, 85;
  • ethical import of, 41, 205
  • Public Opinion, Code of, 30
  • Public and private virtue, Utilitarian and Intuitionist estimates of, 495
  • Punishment, 281, 290 seq., 290 note 1, 291 note 1;
  • preventive and retributory views of, 71-72
  • Purity, 223, 329-331, 329 note 2, 357-359
  • Quantitative Hedonism, 129
  • Quasi-moral Sentiment, 27-28, 173-174
  • Quasi-moral Sentiments and Rational Self-love, 173-174
  • Rank of Motives, difficulties of estimating, 365-367, 369;
  • conflicting estimates of, by moralists, 366;
  • difficulty due to complexity of motive, 368
  • Rational action, not to be identified with (a) disinterested or (b) free action, 57;
  • Spinoza’s view of the principle of, 89-90
  • Rational Benevolence, 96;
  • may be self-limiting, 385;
  • Kant’s treatment of, 385-386 Note, 389-390
  • Rational Self-love (Rational Egoism, Prudence)—and Conscience, 172, 200, 200 note 2, 366;
  • and Rational Benevolence, 386 note 4, 498 seq.
  • Reason— ginternal">231, 231 note 1
  • Sources of Happiness, 135, 136, 153 seq.;
  • judgments of common sense respecting them, only roughly trustworthy, 158-160;
  • common sense estimates of (a) at best are only true for ordinary persons, (b) are vitiated by mal-observation, (c) confuse between objects of natural desire and sources of experienced pleasure, 151, 152, (d) mix moral and Æsthetic preferences with hedonistic, 153, (e) are found to be full of inconsistencies, 153-158
  • Sovereign power, Hobbist and Austinian views of, 300 note 1
  • Special moral codes, 30, 31, 168, 169, 340, 341
  • Special need, duties arising out of, 261, 262
  • Spencer, H., 125-126, 177 note 1, 183 seq., 194 note 1, 470, 471, 470 notes 1 and 2, 473;
  • (Social Statics), 18 note 2, 194 note 1;
  • (Data of Ethics), 18 note 2, 177 note 1, 194 note 1, 470 note 1
  • “Sphere of individual option” determined by Utilitarian calculation, 477-479
  • Spinoza, 90
  • Stephen, Leslie, 319 Note, 471, 471 note 2, 472, 473;
  • (Science of Ethics), 42 note 1, 471
  • Stewart, Dugald, 454, 455;
  • (Philosophy of the Active and Moral Powers), 92 note 2, 454 note 1
  • Stoic system, its place in the development of ethical thought, 106;
  • ethics, circular reasonings of, 376, 377
  • Stoicism, later compared with earlier, 376 note 1
  • Stoics, 92, 105, 129
  • Stout, G. F., 180 note 2, 182, 186;
  • (Analytic Psychology), 182 note 1
  • Subjective, cf. Objective
  • Suggestio falsi, 317
  • Suicide prohibited by Common Sense, 327, 331, 356
  • Sully, <

    THE END

    Printed by R. & R. Clark, Limited, Edinburgh.


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

    Clyx.com


  • Top of Page
    Top of Page