Chapter V., Of Truth of Space: Secondly, as its Appearance is dependent on the Power of the Eye |
Chapter V., Of Truth of Space:--Secondly, as its Appearance is dependent on the Power of the Eye §1. | The peculiar indistinctness dependent on the retirement of objects from the eye. | 191 | §2. | Causes confusion, but not annihilation of details. | 191 | §3. | Instances in various objects. | 192 | §4. | Two great resultant truths; that nature is never distinct, and never vacant. | 193 | §5. | Complete violation of both these principles by the old masters. They are either distinct or vacant. | 193 | §6. | Instances from Nicholas Poussin. | 194 | §7. | From Claude. | 194 | §8. | And G. Poussin. | 195 | §9. | The imperative necessity, in landscape painting, of fulness and finish. | 196 | §10. | Breadth is not vacancy. | 197 | §11. | The fulness and mystery of Turner's distances. | 198 | §12. | Farther illustrations in architectural drawing. | 199 | §13. | In near objects as well as distances. | 199 | §14. | Vacancy and falsehood of Canaletto. | 200 | §15. | Still greater fulness and finish in landscape foregrounds. | 200 | §16. | Space and size are destroyed alike by distinctness and by vacancy. | 202 | §17. | Swift execution best secures perfection of details. | 202 | §18. | Finish is far more necessary in landscape than in historical subjects. | 202 | §19. | Recapitulation of the section. | 203 |
|
|