| §1. | What rocks were the chief components of ancient landscape foreground. | 309 |
| §2. | Salvator's limestones. The real characters of the rock. Its fractures, and obtuseness of angles. | 309 |
| §3. | Salvator's acute angles caused by the meeting of concave curves.[Page lxviii] | 310 |
| §4. | Peculiar distinctness of light and shade in the rocks of nature. | 311 |
| §5. | Peculiar confusion of both in the rocks of Salvator. | 311 |
| §6. | And total want of any expression of hardness or brittleness. | 311 |
| §7. | Instances in particular pictures. | 312 |
| §8. | Compared with the works of Stanfield. | 312 |
| §9. | Their absolute opposition in every particular. | 313 |
| §10. | The rocks of J. D. Harding. | 313 |
| §11. | Characters of loose earth and soil. | 314 |
| §12. | Its exceeding grace and fulness of feature. | 315 |
| §13. | The ground of Teniers. | 315 |
| §14. | Importance of these minor parts and points. | 316 |
| §15. | The observance of them is the real distinction between the master and the novice. | 316 |
| §16. | Ground of Cuyp. | 317 |
| §17. | And of Claude. | 317 |
| §18. | The entire weakness and childishness of the latter. | 318 |
| §19. | Compared with the work of Turner. | 318 |
| §20. | General features of Turner's foreground. | 319 |
| §21. | Geological structure of his rocks in the Fall of the Tees. | 319 |
| §22. | Their convex surfaces and fractured edges. | 319 |
| §23. | And perfect unity. | 320 |
| §24. | Various parts whose history is told us by the details of the drawing. | 321 |
| §25. | Beautiful instance of an exception to general rules in the Llanthony. | 321 |
| §26. | Turner's drawing of detached blocks of weathered stone. | 322 |
|
