Discoveries and Inventions of the Nineteenth Century

EXPLOSIVES.

The illustration above will serve to remind the reader of the great importance of explosive agents in the operations of civil industry. By reason of the more impressive and exciting spectacles which attend the use of such agents in warfare, we are rather apt to lose sight of their far more extensive utility as the giant forces whose aid man invokes when he wishes to rend the rock in order to make a road for his steam horse, or in order to penetrate into the bowels of the earth in search of the precious ore. A little reflection will show that if such work had to be done with only the pickaxe, the chisel, and the crowbar, the progress would be painfully slow; and railway cuttings through masses of compact limestone, like that represented in Fig. 339, for example, would be well-nigh impossible. The formation of cuttings and tunnels, and the removal of rocks in mining operations, are not the only service which explosive agents render to the industrial arts; there is, besides other uses which might be enumerated, the preparation of foundations for buildings, bridges, harbours, and lighthouses. The use of gunpowder in all such operations as those which have been referred to is too well known to require description. But of late years gunpowder has been to a great extent superseded for such purposes by two remarkable products of modern chemistry, called gun-cotton and nitro-glycerine. Military art has also benefited by at least one of these products; and the use of charges of gun-cotton for torpedoes has already been described and illustrated in these pages.

It is not a little curious that the two most terribly powerful explosives known to science should be prepared from two most harmless and familiar substances. The nice, soft, clean, gentle cotton-wool, in which ladies wrap their most delicate trinkets, becomes, by a simple chemical transformation, a tremendously powerful explosive; and the clear, sweet, bland liquid, glycerine, which they value as a cosmetic for its emollient properties, becomes, by a like transformation, a still more terrifically powerful explosive than the former. It is, perhaps, even more curious that having undergone the transformation which confers upon it these formidable qualities, neither cotton-wool nor glycerine is changed in appearance. The former remains white and fleecy; the latter is still a colourless syrupy-looking liquid.

The fibres which form cotton, linen, paper, and wood, are composed almost entirely of a substance which is known to the chemist as cellulose or cellulin. That this substance, as it exists in the fibres of linen and in sawdust, could be converted into an explosive body by the action of nitric acid, appears to have been first observed by the French chemist, Pelouze, in 1838. The action with cellulose in the form of cotton-wool was more fully examined by Professor SchÖnbein, of Basle, who, in 1846, first described the method of preparing gun-cotton, and suggested some uses for it. He directs that one part of finely-carded cotton-wool should be immersed in fifteen parts of a mixture of equal measures of strong sulphuric and nitric acids; that after the cotton has remained in the mixture for a few minutes, it should be removed, plunged in cold water, and washed until every trace of acid has been removed, and then carefully dried at a temperature not exceeding the boiling-point of water.

After Professor SchÖnbein had demonstrated the power of the new agent in blasting, and its projectile force in fire-arms, its manufacture on a large scale was undertaken at several places. Messrs. Hall commenced to make it at their gunpowder works at Faversham, and a manufactory was also established near Paris. In July, 1847, a fearful explosion of gun-cotton occurred at the Faversham works, which was believed to have been caused by the spontaneous detonation of that substance. This induced Messrs. Hall to discontinue the manufacture as too dangerous; and they even destroyed a large quantity of the product which they had in hand by burying it in the ground. The making of gun-cotton was soon afterwards discontinued also by the French, who did not find the substance to possess all the qualities fitting it for military use. The Prussian Government also began to make gun-cotton; but the experiments were put a stop to by the explosion of their factory. An eminent artillery officer in the Austrian service, General von Lenk, undertook a thorough examination of the manufacture and properties of gun-cotton for military purposes. He introduced several improvements into the processes of the manufacture; and the Austrian Government established works at HÏrtenberg, with a view to the adoption of gun-cotton as a substitute for gunpowder in fire-arms. It has some undoubted advantages over powder, for it neither heats the gun nor fouls it, and it produces no smoke. Notwithstanding this the Austrians have not abandoned the use of gunpowder in favour of gun-cotton.

Gun-cotton, as a military agent, has a strenuous advocate in Professor Abel, who presides over the Chemical Department of the British War Office. To this gentleman we are indebted for great improvements in the manufacture of gun-cotton, and for a more complete investigation of its properties. Professor Abel’s processes were put in practice at a manufactory which the Government established at Waltham Abbey; and Messrs. Prentice also set up works at Stowmarket.

Some details of the mode in which the manufacture of gun-cotton was carried on at Stowmarket may be of interest. The cotton was first thoroughly cleansed and carefully dried; and these operations are of great importance, for unless they are well performed, the product is liable to explode spontaneously. The cotton was then weighed out in charges of 1 lb., and each charge was completely immersed in a separate vessel, containing a cold mixture of sulphuric and nitric acids. After a short immersion the cotton was removed from the liquid, and with about ten times its own weight of acids adhering to it, each charge was placed in a separate jar, where it was allowed to remain for forty-eight hours. The vessels were kept cool during the whole period by being placed in a trough through which cold water was flowing. On removal from the jars, the cotton was freed from adhering acid by being placed in a centrifugal drying machine. It was then drenched with a large quantity of cold water, and dried, washed again in a stream of cold water for forty-eight hours, and the operations of alternately washing for forty-eight hours and drying were repeated eight times. The drying was effected by placing the material in cylinders of wire-gauze, which were whirled round by a steam engine at the rate of 800 revolutions per minute, so that the water was expelled by centrifugal force. The cotton was next reduced to a pulp by a process similar to that which is employed in paper-making, and the moist pulp was rammed into metallic cylinders by hydraulic pressure, in order that it might be brought into forms suitable for use in blasting, &c. The pulp was put into these moulds while wet, but the water was nearly all expelled by the compression. The cylinders of gun-cotton thus obtained were then covered with paper-parchment, and finally dried at a steam temperature, with many precautions. The compression of the cotton pulp, by bringing a large quantity of the material into a smaller bulk, causes a greater concentration of the explosive energy, and this is a matter of great importance in blasting.

We may now consider what chemistry has to teach concerning the nature of the action by which cotton-wool is converted into gun-cotton. Cotton itself is nearly pure cellulose. The chemical composition of cellulose may be represented most simply by the formula C₆H₁₀O₅. Nitric acid is a powerful oxidizing agent, and is constantly used in chemistry to fix oxygen in various substances; but another kind of action exerted by nitric acid in certain cases consists in the substitution of a portion of its atoms for hydrogen, by which the residue of the particle of nitric acid is converted into water. The formula for nitric acid may be written HO NO₂, and it will be seen that by changing NO₂ for H, water, HOH, would be produced. This is precisely the kind of action which occurs when cellulose is converted into nitro-cellulose. Two or three, or more, atoms of hydrogen may be taken out of cellulose, and replaced by two or three, or more, groups NO₂, and the result will be a different kind of nitro-cellulose, according to the number of atoms in the molecule replaced by NO₂. Several varieties of gun-cotton are known, these being doubtless the result of the differences here alluded to. The action producing di-nitro-cellulose is represented by this equation:

C₆H₁₀O₅	+	2HNO₃	=	C₆H₈(NO₂)₂O₅	+	2H₂O.
Cellulose.		Nitric acid.		Di-nitro-cellulose.		Water.

The equation shows that water is produced by the reaction, and the sulphuric acid which is used in the preparation performs no further part than to take up this water, which would otherwise go to dilute the rest of the nitric acid. The union of sulphuric acid and water is attended with great heat, hence the necessity of cooling the vessels in making the gun-cotton. Quite other products would be formed if the mixture became heated.

The action of nitric acid on glycerine is of the same kind as that on cellulose. When glycerine is allowed to drop into a cooled mixture of nitric acid and sulphuric acid, the eye can detect little or no difference between the appearance of the liquid which collects in the bottom of the vessel and the glycerine dropped in. The product of the action is, however, the terrible nitro-glycerine, a heavy, oily-looking liquid, which explodes with fearful violence. Even a single drop placed on a piece of paper, and struck on an anvil, detonates violently and with a deafening report. The chemical change which is effected in the glycerine (C₃H₈O₃), is the substitution of three NO₂ groups for three of hydrogen, producing C₃H₅(NO₂)₃O₃, or tri-nitro-glycerine. The general reader may perhaps marvel that the chemist should be able not only to count the number of atoms which go to make up the particles of a compound body, but to say that they are arranged so and so: that the atoms do not form an indiscriminate heap, but that they are connected in an assignable manner. The reader is no doubt aware that these compound particles are extremely small, and he may reasonably wonder how science can pronounce upon the structure of things so small. He may be more perplexed to learn that a calculation made by Sir W. Thompson shows that the particles of water, for instance, cannot possibly be more than the 1
250000000th of an inch in diameter, and may be only 1
20th of that size. The truth is that the very existence of atoms and molecules is an assumption. Like the undulatory ether, it is an hypothesis which is adopted to simplify and connect our ideas, and not a demonstrated reality. But the atomic hypothesis has so wide a scope that some philosophers hold the existence of atoms and molecules as almost a known fact. Be that as it may, the chemist in assigning to a body a certain molecular formula really does nothing but express the results of certain experiments he has made upon it. With one re-agent it is decomposed in this manner, with another in that. By certain treatment it yields an acid, a salt; so much carbonic acid, such a weight of water, is acted on or remains unaltered; gives a precipitate or refuses to do so. Such are the facts which the chemist conceives are co-ordinated and expressed by the formula he gives to a substance. The best formula is that which accords with the greatest number of the properties of the body—which includes as many of the facts as possible. It follows, therefore, that a formula which aims at expressing more than the mere percentage composition of the body—which, in the language of the atom hypothesis, seeks to represent the mode in which the atoms are grouped in the molecule, but which in reality represents only reactions, is written according as the chemist considers this or that group of reactions more important. These remarks might be illustrated by filling this page with the different formulÆ (a score or more) which have been proposed as representing the constitution (reactions?) of one of the best-known of organic compounds, namely, acetic acid.

Whether atoms really exist, and their arrangement in the particles of bodies can be deduced from the phenomena, or not, the fact is undeniable that these ideas have given chemists a wonderful grasp of the facts of their science. The consistency and completeness of the explanation afforded by these theories are ever being extended by modifications which enable them to embrace more and more facts. Some of the properties of the substance we are now considering confirm in a remarkable manner the theoretical views which are expressed in its constitutional formula. We may first consider the nature of gunpowder, and by comparing it with nitro-glycerine, endeavour to explain the greater power of the latter substance. Gunpowder is a mixture of charcoal, sulphur, and nitre, the latter constituting three-fourths of its weight. Nitre supplies oxygen for the combustion of the charcoal, which is thus converted into carbonic acid, and the sulphur, which is added to increase the rapidity of the combustion, is also oxidized. The products of the action are, however, numerous and complicated, but the important result is the sudden generation of a quantity of carbonic acid, nitrogen, carbonic oxide, hydrogen, and other gases, which at the oxidizing temperature and pressure of the air would occupy a space 300 times greater than the powder from which they are set free; but the intense heat attending the chemical action dilates the gases, so that at the moment of explosion they would occupy a space at least 1,500 times greater than the gunpowder. The materials of which gunpowder is composed are finely powdered, in order that each portion shall be in immediate contact with others, which shall act upon it. Plainly, the more thorough the incorporation of the materials—that is, the more finely ground and intimately mixed they are—the more rapid will be the inflammation of the powder.

Looking now at the crude formula of nitro-glycerine, C₃H₅N₃O₉, the reader will remark that the molecule contains more than sufficient oxygen to form carbonic acid with all the carbon atoms, and water with all the hydrogen atoms; for the C₆ in two molecules of nitro-glycerine would take only O₁₂ to form 6CO₂; and the H₁₀, to be converted into 5H₂O, would only need O₅; thus there would be an excess of oxygen. Now, it may occur to the reflective reader that in every molecule of nitro-glycerine the carbon and hydrogen are already associated with as much oxygen as they can take up: that they are, in fact, already burnt, and that no further union is possible. But from chemical considerations it has been deduced that in the nitro-glycerine molecule the oxygen atoms, except only three, which are partially and imperfectly joined to carbon, are united to nitrogen atoms only. The constitution of the molecule may be represented by arranging, as below, the letters which stand for the atoms, and by joining them with lines, which shall stand for the bonds by which the atoms are united.

We see here that the hydrogen atoms are completely, and the carbon atoms partially, detached from the oxygen atoms; and therefore these atoms are in the condition of the separated carbon and oxygen atoms in gunpowder. Only the pieces of matter which lie side by side in gunpowder are in size to the molecules of nitro-glycerine as mountains to grains of sand. The mixture of the materials is then so much more intimate in nitro-glycerine, since atoms which can rush together are actually within the limits of the molecules; and these molecules have such a degree of minuteness, that 25 millions, at least, could be placed in a row within the length of an inch. We know that the finer the grains and the more intimate the mixture, the quicker will gunpowder inflame; but here we have a mixture far surpassing in minute subdivision anything we can imagine as existing in gunpowder. Hence the combination in the case of nitro-glycerine must be instantaneous, whereas that in gunpowder, quick though it be, must still require a certain interval. If it take a thousandth of a second for the gases to be completely liberated from a mass of gunpowder, and only one-millionth of a second for a vast quantity of carbonic acid, nitrogen, and steam to be set free from nitro-glycerine, the destructive effect will be much greater in the latter case. Again, the volume of the gases liberated from nitro-glycerine in its detonation have at least 5,000 times the bulk of the substance. We have entered into these chemical considerations, at some risk of wearying the reader, with the desire of affording him a clue to the singular properties of nitro-glycerine and gun-cotton, which we are about to describe.

The nature of the chemical changes which may be set up in an explosive substance, and the rapidity with which these changes proceed throughout a mass of the material, are greatly modified by the conditions under which the action takes place. If a red-hot wire be applied to a small loose tuft of gun-cotton, it goes off with a bright flash without leaving any smoke or any other residue. Thus, when the substance is quite unconfined, no explosion occurs. If the cotton-wool be made into a thread, and laid along the ground, it will burn at the rate of about 6 in. per second; if it be twisted into a yarn, the combustion will run along at the rate of 6 ft. per second; but if the yarn be enclosed in an Indian-rubber tube, the ignition proceeds at the rate of 30 ft. in a second. If to a limited surface of gun-cotton, such as one end of a length of gun-cotton yarn, a source of heat is applied—the temperature of which is high enough to set up a chemical change, but not high enough to inflame the resulting gases (carbonic oxide, hydrogen, &c.)—the cotton burns comparatively slowly, rather smouldering than inflaming. If, however, a flame be applied, the gun-cotton flashes off with great rapidity, because the heat applied sets fire to the gaseous products of the chemical action. But if the gun-cotton be confined so that the gases cannot escape, the combustion becomes rapid however set up. The reason is that if the gases escape into the air, they carry off so much of the heat produced by the smouldering gun-cotton, that the temperature does not rise to the extent required to produce the flaming ignition, in which the products are completely oxidized. If a mass of gun-cotton be enclosed in a capacious vessel from which the air has been removed, and the gun-cotton be ignited by means of a wire made hot by electricity, the cotton will at first only burn in the slow way without flame; but as the gases accumulate and exert a pressure which retards the abstraction of heat accompanying their formation, the temperature will rise and attain the degree necessary for the complete and rapid chemical changes involved in the flaming combustion. Thus, the more resistance is offered to the escape of the gases, the more rapid and perfect is the combustion and explosive force produced by the ignition. Now, the explosion of gun-cotton has been found to be too rapid when it is packed into the powder-chamber of a gun, for its tendency is to burst the gun before the ball has been fairly started. Hence a material like gunpowder, in which the combustion is more gradual, is better suited for artillery. The ignition of gunpowder, though rapid, is not instantaneous, and therefore we can speak of it as more or less gradual. Indeed, in even the most violent explosives, some time is doubtless required for the propagation of the action from particle to particle. This extreme rapidity of combustion, and consequent rending power, which is so objectionable in a gun-chamber, makes gun-cotton a most powerful bursting charge for shells, and, when it is enclosed in strong receptacles, for torpedoes also.

But by the researches of Nobel, Professor Abel, and others, it has been discovered—and this is, perhaps, the most remarkable discovery in connection with explosives—that gun-cotton, nitro-glycerine, and other explosive bodies, are capable of producing explosions in a manner quite different from that which attends their ignition by heat. The violence of this kind of explosion is far greater than that due to ordinary ignition, for the action takes place with far greater rapidity throughout the mass, and is, indeed, practically instantaneous. It appears to be produced by the mere mechanical agitation or vibrations which are communicated to the particles of the substance. Turning back to the representation of the molecule of nitro-glycerine on page 744, it will not be difficult to imagine that this may be an unstable kind of structure; that the atoms of oxygen are prevented from rushing into union with those of hydrogen and carbon only by the interposition of the nitrogen; and that an agitation of the structure might shake all the atoms loose, and leave them free to re-combine according to their strongest affinities. Nitro-glycerine is by no means so ready to inflame as is gun-cotton: it is said that the flame of a match may be safely extinguished by plunging it into the liquid; and when a sufficient heat is applied to a quantity of the liquid in the open air, it will burn quietly and without explosion. Even when nitro-glycerine is confined, the application of heat cannot always be made to produce its explosion; or, at least, the circumstances under which it can do so are not accurately known, and the operation is difficult and uncertain. On the other hand, nitro-glycerine explodes violently even when freely exposed to the air if there be exploded in contact with it a confined charge of gunpowder, or a detonating compound such as fulminating powder. Gun-cotton possesses the same property of exploding by concussion, which appears indeed to be a general one belonging to all explosive bodies. According to recent researches, even gunpowder is capable of a detonative explosion. A mass of gunpowder confined with a certain proportion of gun-cotton, which is itself set off by fulminate of mercury, is said to exert an explosive force four times greater than that developed by the ignition of the gunpowder in the ordinary manner. It has also been found that wet gun-cotton can be exploded by concussion, and the force of the explosion is unimpaired even when the material is saturated with water. This makes it possible to use gun-cotton with greater safety, as it may be transported and handled in the wet condition without risk, and it preserves its properties for an indefinite period without being deteriorated by the water. Some experiments illustrating the extraordinary force of the detonative explosions of gun-cotton and nitro-glycerine will give the reader an idea of their power.

A palisade, constructed by sinking 4 ft. into the ground trunks of trees 18 in. in diameter, was completely destroyed in some experiments at Stowmarket by the explosion of only 15 lbs. of gun-cotton. Huge logs were sent bounding across the field to great distances, and some of the trees were literally reduced to match-wood. The gun-cotton, be it observed, was simply laid on the ground exposed to the air. The destructive powers of nitro-glycerine are even greater. A tin canister, containing only a few ounces of nitro-glycerine, is placed, without being in any way confined, on the top of a smooth boulder stone of several tons weight; it is exploded by a fuse containing fulminating powder, which is fired from a distance by electricity. There is a report, and the stone is found in a thousand fragments. The last experiment shows one of the advantages of nitro-glycerine over gunpowder as a blasting material, beyond its far greater power, which is about ten times that of gunpowder. A charge of gunpowder inserted in a vertical hole tends to force out a conical mass, the apex of which is at the space occupied by the charge. With nitro-glycerine, and also with gun-cotton, which last has almost six times the force of gunpowder, a powerful rending action is exerted below as well as above the charge. Again, in blasting with gunpowder the charge must be confined, and the hole is filled in above the charge with tightly rammed materials, forming what is termed the tamping. But nitro-glycerine requires no tamping: a small, thin metallic core containing the charge is simply placed in the drill-hole, or the liquid itself is poured in, and a little water placed above it. The effect of the explosion of nitro-glycerine in “striking down,” when apparently no resistance is offered, will seem very strange to the reader who is oblivious of certain fundamental principles of mechanics. The force of the explosion is due entirely to the sudden production of an enormous volume of gas, which at the ordinary pressure would occupy several thousand times the bulk of the material from which it is produced. This gas, by the law of the equality of action and reaction, presses down upon the stone with the same force that it exerts to raise the superincumbent atmosphere. The pressure of the gas at the moment of its liberation is enormous; but the atmosphere cannot instantaneously yield to this, for time is required to set the mass of air in motion, and the wave of compression advances slowly compared with the rapidity of the explosion. Hence the air acts, practically, like a mass of solid matter, against which the gases press, and which yields less readily than the rock, so that the blow which is struck takes visible effect on the latter. Now, with gunpowder, the evolution of gas is less rapid, the atmosphere has time to yield, and the reaction has not the same violence. The rapidity of the evolution of gas from the exploding nitro-glycerine is so great, that the gases, though apparently unconfined, are not so in reality; for the atmosphere acts as a real and very efficient tamping.

When nitro-glycerine first came into use for blasting purposes, it was used in the liquid form under the name of “blasting oil;” but the dangers attending the handling of the substance in this state are so great, that it is now usual to mix the liquid with some powdered substance which is itself without action, and merely serves as a vehicle for containing the nitro-glycerine. To mixtures of this kind the names “dynamite,” “dualine,” “lithofracteur” &c., have been given.

It is now hardly necessary to point out that the discovery of these new explosives has largely extended our power over the rocks, enabling works to be executed which would have been considered impracticable with less powerful agents. It is true that the most fearful disasters have been accidentally produced by the new explosives; but such occasional devastation is the price exacted for the possession of powerful agents. And just as in other cases—steam, for example—where great forces are dealt with, so these new powers must be managed with unceasing care, and placed in the hands of only skilful and intelligent men.

The products of the combustion of gunpowder are not all gaseous, but include solid compounds, such as carbonate and sulphate of potassium. It is these that give rise to the smoke seen when a gun is discharged, and which, in rapid firing, soon obscures the sight of the objects aimed at. They are also the causes of the fouling of the bore. Gun-cotton is quite unexceptionable in these respects, and that prompted the attempts made soon after its introduction to use it instead of gunpowder in fire-arms. But the explosion of gun-cotton was found too sudden and violent for guns and rifles, so that many serious accidents in consequence occurred. The next thing done was to lessen the rapidity of the explosion by using gun-cotton mixed with ordinary cotton, or twisted in threads round some inert substance—in fact, to mitigate the violence of the shock by some mechanical disposition of the material. The introduction of rapid firing guns and repeating rifles forced on the problem of a smokeless powder; and as the plan of replacing nitrate of potassium, in ordinary gunpowder, by nitrate of ammonium was found to be attended with loss of the keeping quality of the powder, other materials, such as picric acid, which forms also the basis of the explosive called mÉlinite, have been proposed. The composition of mÉlinite was long a mystery, and that of the smokeless powder adopted by the French was so carefully concealed that many experiments had to be made by other nations to discover some similar preparation, which was found possible by combining certain substances with gun-cotton so as to modify the violence of its explosion, and produce a manageable material having the required properties. The British Government, after many experiments and much careful testing, decided to adopt cordite, made of nitro-glycerine, in which, by the aid of volatile solvent, di-nitro-cellulose is dissolved, together with a little mineral oil. The semi-fluid composition, forced through a round hole or die, comes out like a thread or cord, which the evaporation of the volatile solvent leaves with very much the appearance of common brown window-cord. This material has the several advantages of keeping well, of being uniform in its propulsive powers, of being capable of imparting as high a velocity as a much larger charge of the ordinary black gunpowder, while at the same time exercising a less pressure on the chase of the gun.

It will have become obvious from the preceding paragraphs that, according to the conditions under which an explosive is to be used, selection must be made of the most suitable. For example, the substances employed for propelling projectiles from guns must not have the violent rending power of certain others, which, by this very property, are most useful for blasting operations; and, again, although explosives of this last kind are inadmissible as projectile agents, they are of the kind best adapted for use in shells where it is the disruptive action that is required. Also in blasting operations, the explosive has to be adapted to the nature of the work, and it has been found that a substance which has worked well in driving a heading for a tunnel through one kind of rock may prove both slow in progress, and more costly in expenditure, when some different kind of rock is reached. Besides this, regard must be had in blasting operations to the nature of the effect required, which is in some instances a shattering of the rock into fragments, in others a detachment of it in masses. Thus, in the working of a slate quarry, the explosive used must not be of a nature to shiver the rock into useless splinters, but must operate in such a manner that compact masses may be separated from the mountain side in a condition suitable for cleaving, by appropriate tools, into numberless broad laminÆ, which, trimmed into rectangular shape, constitute our well-known roofing slates. The blasting used on a coal seam must be so conducted as to yield the material as much as possible in big lumps or cobbles rather than in slack. When granite is blasted for the purpose of obtaining building stones, the explosive must be one that, by its comparatively slow action, divides the compact rock into the largest possible blocks. On the other hand, when granite is blasted merely with the object of removing it, as when a tunnel has to be driven through a mass of it, the most disintegrating agent is then the best. The common popular expressions by which the two classes of explosives just referred to are distinguished are “high explosives” and “low explosives.” Dynamite may be taken as a type of the former, and gunpowder a type of the latter. As will be gathered from what is to follow, no definite separation between these classes can be fixed, but in a general way it may be said that, where a destructive, rather than a propelling or pressure effect is required, the explosive used is one brought into operation by a concussive or detonating priming, and acting mostly by detonation within itself, such as dynamite, &c.

Whereas, up to nearly the middle of the nineteenth century, gunpowder was practically the only explosive in use for either civil or military purposes, the close of the century can show a list of several hundred preparations that have been proposed or actually used in its stead. The names by which these are put forward are expressive sometimes of an ingredient in their composition, such as “ammonia dynamite,” “cellulosa,” “mica powder,” “dynamite au carbon,” “dynamite de boghead,” &c.; and sometimes the inventor’s name, as “So-and-so’s powder or explosive”; sometimes of the strength of the mixture under various fanciful names, such as “dynamite,” “heraklin,” “vigorite,” &c., &c.; sometimes the names relate to the appearance of the compound, as “white gunpowder,” “blasting gelatine,” &c., &c.; and sometimes to other circumstances, such as “pudrolithe,” “saxifragine,” “safety powder,” &c., &c. A very long list might be given of the substances severally used in these various compositions. It will be sufficient to indicate the general nature of the several classes into which the new explosives may be divided. By turning back to p. 746, the reader will be reminded of the composition of gunpowder, and of the part played therein by the nitre (nitrate of potassium). Now a considerable number of the recently patented explosives are simply modified gunpowders, which all contain some nitrate, replacing wholly, or in part, the nitrate of potassium, while sulphur is an ingredient of nearly all, and in many, the charcoal of gunpowder is partly or wholly replaced by other carbonaceous materials, such as sawdust, coal-dust, tan, starch, paraffin, lycopodium, graphite, peat, flour, bran, &c. Certain mineral salts enter into the composition of some, such as sulphate of iron, carbonate of copper, sulphide of antimony, &c., &c.

In another class of the newer explosives chlorate of potassium takes the place of the nitrate as the oxygen supplying material, with similar variations as to the carbonaceous matter as are referred to above. Yellow prussiate of potash and sugar sometimes replace both the charcoal and sulphur of gunpowder in this class. Explosives of this chlorate class are usually dangerous to manufacture, and are often very sensitive, and also liable to changes by keeping, which render them still more dangerous.

The next class of preparations brings us to the “high explosives,” properly so called, and it is among these that most notable preparations are met with. Of all the explosive nitro-compounds, gun-cotton was the first practically employed (vide p. 741); but very soon after nitro-glycerine was discovered by Sobrero when working in Pelouze’s laboratory. This afterwards became known as “blasting oil,” but it was many years before nitro-glycerine came into use as an explosive, namely, when, about 1860, Nobel, a Swedish engineer, had established factories for its production as an agent for blasting. At first there were difficulties and dangers attending its use, and it was only when Nobel had discovered the detonation method of setting free its tremendous energy that the new era of “high explosives” really commenced. Between 1860 and 1870 such a number of appalling catastrophes occurred in the handling of the new “blasting oil” that in several European countries its use was entirely prohibited. And, in England at least, this prohibition remains, for “in a liquid state this explosive cannot be sold in, or imported into this country. It is manufactured under the strict provision that it is forthwith made up into dynamite or some kindred licensed explosive.” ... “The only source, practically speaking, of nitro-glycerine on a commercial scale in this country is the factory of Nobel’s Explosive Co. (Ltd.) at Ardeer, in the county of Ayr.”^[17] Nitro-glycerine being so extremely dangerous to handle in the liquid form led Nobel to propose its use in an altered condition, by causing it to be absorbed by some inert porous material, the most suitable being a siliceous earth found in Germany, and there known as kieselguhr, of which one part will absorb three times its weight of liquid nitro-glycerine. Here we have the original dynamite, but now other substances are used for absorbing the liquid, and there are, indeed, dynamites of two different classes:

1. Dynamites with inert absorbents.

2. Dynamites with absorbents which are themselves combustible, or explosive.

17.Major Cundill, H.M.’s Inspector of Explosives.

Of the latter class there are endless varieties. One that has latterly been much used is called “blasting gelatine,” and is practically a combination of nitro-glycerine and nitro-cotton, this last ingredient being a less nitrated cellulose than gun-cotton. Blasting gelatine contains a very large percentage of nitro-glycerine (93–95 per cent.), and has the appearance of stiff jelly of a pale yellow colour. It may be of interest to remark that this second class of dynamites admits of well-defined sub-divisions according to the nature of the absorbent, as:

(a) Charcoal, or other simple carbonaceous material.

(b) Gunpowder, or other nitrate or chlorate mixtures.

Fig. 340.—View on the Tyne.

Clyx.com