Having often been requested by different magistrates, to investigate cases of sharping, I have often been struck, while doing so, with the obstacles and embarrassments which a judge's own honesty must oppose to his elucidation of matters of sharping and cheating at play. How is it possible that he can penetrate the subtile web, with which the sharper surrounds his dupes,—how can he be able to detect the tricks of these rogues,—if he does not understand the manoeuvres of sleight-of-hand? By a singular reversal of the ordinary conditions of justice, the magistrate finds himself most powerless, when the rogue has committed the most daring, and artfully cunning, frauds. A great portion of my life having been devoted to the study of sleight-of-hand, and having, as yet, I have therefore written this work, the moral and end of which may be summed up in this incontestable truth: "Éclairez les dupes, il n'y aura plus de fripons." There is no reason, however, because a fact is incontestable, that it will not be contested; indeed, I am of opinion that it will be, and, as a proof of what I state, I am myself going to offer an objection which might be made on this subject. In disclosing the secrets of sharpers, people will say, Do you not fear to create in the minds of unfortunate gamblers, a wish to try and better their fortunes, by the very means you point out to warn them? If I had not taken this precaution, what would have been the result? It is only one individual, already half perverted, who will avail himself of the knowledge I impart, to learn to cheat, while hundreds of dupes will have been put on their guard. If these revelations serve to awaken vicious ideas in perverted minds, what can be said of the various works on the laws of duelling, in which you can learn how to kill your neighbour according to rule? Is it not to be feared, that the opinions contained in those books may lead to crime? For my part, I have so good an opinion of mankind in general, that I trust the perusal of "Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes." |