CHAPTER III DOSAGE

Previous

The amount of chlorine required for efficient treatment is very largely determined by the amount required to satisfy the oxidisable matter present in the water. Many experimenters have reported results that would indicate that appreciable concentrations of chlorine are required for bactericidal action but the details of the technique, as published, show that the effect of the organic matter added with the test organism was not thoroughly appreciated. One cubic centimetre of a culture in ordinary peptone water, added to one litre of water, would increase the organic content by approximately 10 parts per million, an amount that would absorb appreciable amounts of chlorine.Other conditions also make it very difficult to compare the results obtained in the past: one of these is the degree of purity set as the objective. German bacteriologists added enormous numbers of the test organism and endeavoured to obtain the complete removal of the organism from such quantities as one litre of water with a contact period often as short as 10 minutes. Nissen,[1] of the Hygienic Institute of Berlin, found that a 1:800 dilution of bleach (420 p.p.m. of chlorine) was required to destroy B. typhosus in one minute and a 1:1600 dilution (210 p.p.m. of chlorine) in 10 minutes. DelÉpine[2] obtained somewhat similar results by means of the thread method for testing disinfectants. Phelps,[3] using gelatine plates for enumeration of the bacteria, obtained a 90 per cent reduction of B. typhosus in twenty minutes with 5 p.p.m. of available chlorine; over 99 per cent reduction in one hour, and over 99.99 per cent reduction in 18 hours. Wesbrook, Whittaker, and Mohler[4] tested bleach solutions with various strains of B. typhosus by means of the plate method and found that the most resistant one was reduced from 20,000 per c.cm. to sterility (in 1 c.cm.) by 3 p.p.m. of available chlorine in fifty minutes and that the least resistant one only required 1.0 p.p.m. with a thirty minutes’ contact.Lederer and Bachmann[5] have reported the following results:

TABLE V

Percentage Reduction, 15 Minutes’ Contact
Available
Chlorine
p.p.m.
Nature of Test Organism.
B.
cloacÆ.
B.
fÆcalis
alkali-
genes.
B.
para-
typho-
sus.
Proteus
mira-
bilis.
B.
enter-
itidis.
B.
lactis
aero-
genes.
B.
choleroe-
suis.
0.1 ..... 99.98 ..... 27.3 ..... ..... .....
0.2 99.69 99.99 99.97 45.5 99.83 99.17 95.8
0.3 99.75 100.00 100.00 63.7 99.98 99.98 100.0
0.5 100.00 ..... ..... 72.7 100.00 100.00 .....
0.7 ..... ..... ..... 63.7 ..... ..... .....
1.0 ..... ..... ..... 63.7 ..... ..... .....
3.0 ..... ..... ..... 90.9 ..... ..... .....
5.0 ..... ..... ..... 90.0 ..... ..... .....
Original
number of
organisms
per c.cm.
} 160,000 9,500 3,000 8,000 180,000 180,000 500

With the exception of P. mirabilis, which forms endospores, all the organisms were killed (less than 1 per c.cm.) by 0.5 p.p.m. of available chlorine in fifteen minutes.

All these observers found that B. coli, the organism usually employed as an index of contamination, had approximately the same degree of resistance to chlorine as B. typhosus, though Wesbrook et al. directed attention to the varying viability of organisms derived from different sources.

These experiments merely indicate the dosage required for exceptional conditions such as it is inconceivable would ever occur in water-works practice. No information is available regarding the actual B. typhosus content of waters that have caused epidemics of typhoid fever, but for the present purpose it may be assumed that the extreme condition would be a pollution by fresh sewage giving a B. coli content of 1,000 per c.cm. or 200 times worse than the average condition that can be satisfactorily purified without overloading a filter plant (500 B. coli per 100 c.cms.). Experiments made by the author indicate that a suspension of 1,000 B. coli per c.cm. in water, in the absence of organic matter, can be reduced to a 2 B. coli per 100 c.cms. standard (the U.S. Treasury Standard) by 0.1 p.p.m. of available chlorine in ten minutes at 65° F. This experiment indicates the amount of chlorine that is required for the bactericidal action only; such a dosage could never be used in practice to meet a pollution of this degree because of the accompanying organic matter. In actual practice the author has experienced the above condition but once, and on that occasion the B. coli were derived from soil washings and not from fresh sewage.

The amount of chlorine required for germicidal action is small, and the main factors that determine the dosage necessary to obtain this action are (1) the content of readily oxidisable organic matter, (2) the temperature of the water, (3) the method of application of the chlorine and (4) the contact period.Oxidisable Matter. The oxidisable matter may be divided into two classes (a) inorganic and (b) organic. The inorganic constituents naturally found in water, that are readily oxidisable, are ferrous salts (usually carbonates), nitrites, and sulphuretted hydrogen, and these react quantitatively with chlorine until fully oxidised. The oxygen value of chlorine is approximately one-quarter (actually 16:71) the available chlorine content in accordance with the equation Cl2/71 + H2O = 2HCl + O/16. One part per million of available chlorine will oxidise 1.58 p.p.m. of ferrous iron; 0.197 p.p.m. of nitrous nitrogen; and 0.479 p.p.m. of sulphuretted hydrogen.

TABLE VI.[A]—EFFECT OF COLOUR

TEMPERATURE 63° F.
Contact Period. Water “A” Colour 3
Available Chlorine
p.p.m.
Water “B” Colour 40
Available Chlorine
p.p.m.
0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5
Nil 194 194 194 194
5 minutes 121 165 129 66
1 hour 7 95 20 1
5 hours 0 4 0 0
24 hours 0 1 1 0
48 hours 0 0 0 0
[A] Results are B. coli per 10 c.cms. of water.

The organic matter found in water may be derived from various substances such as urea, amido compounds, and cellulose; humus bodies derived from soil washings and swamps may also be present. The humus compounds of swamps and muskeg are usually associated with the characteristic colour of the water derived from these sources. The effect of this coloured organic matter upon the chlorine dosage is well illustrated in Table VI. In this experiment B. coli was used as the test organism and the only varying factor was the organic matter. To obtain the same result with a contact period of one hour at 63° F. it was necessary to use about two and one-half times the amount of chlorine with a water containing 40 p.p.m. of colour as with one practically free from colour. It will be noted that water “A,” in which the colour had been reduced to 3 p.p.m. by coagulation with aluminium sulphate, required a greater dosage of chlorine than was necessary for bactericidal action only. This was due to a residual organic content which produced none or but a trace of colour, for although the colour had been reduced by 92 per cent the organic matter, as measured by the oxygen absorbed test, had only been reduced by 70 per cent.

The results obtained by Harrington[6] at Montreal are in the same direction. During the greater part of the year the water is obtained from the St. Lawrence river, which is colourless and low in organic matter; in the spring months the flood waters of the Ottawa, a highly coloured river, enter the intake and necessitated a much higher dosage.

Chlorine Treatment at Montreal

Source of Supply. Alka-
linity.
Colour. Oxygen
Absorbed
(30 mins.)
Chlorine
Required
p.p.m.
Bacteria
per
c.cm.
Per
Cent
Removed.
Ottawa river 15-20 50-70 14.0 1.50 3,000 over 98
St. Lawrence river 90-100 Nil. 0.30 0.30 500 over 99

Ellms[7] obtained similar results and reported “that the rate at which sterilisation proceeds varies, in a general way, directly with the concentration of the applied available chlorine and the temperature, and inversely as the amount of easily oxidisable matter present.”

Experience with filter plants shows the same facts, the amount of chlorine required for the sterilisation of a filter effluent being invariably less than that necessary to purify the raw water to the same extent.The effect of coloured organic matter upon the absorption of chlorine, in the form of hypochlorite, is shown on Diagram I.

DIAGRAM I
EFFECT OF COLOUR ON ABSORPTION OF CHLORINE BY WATER

AbsorptionofChlorine
by water at 63° F.
ValueofKcalculatedfrom
K= Log(N1/N2) Whent1=0
t2-t1
Timeof
Contact
in
Minutes
ColourofWater Timeof
Contact
in
Minutes
Colour
3 25 40 3 25 40
Nil 10.00 10.00 10.00
5 9.62 7.70 6.50 5 0.0033 0.0227 0.0374
10 9.41 7.03 5.91 10 0.0026 0.0153 0.0228
20 9.17 6.40 5.18 20 0.0018 0.0096 0.0190
40 8.95 5.82 4.47 40 0.0012 0.0057 0.0087
60 8.85 5.63 3.90 60 0.0008 0.0041 0.0068
80 8.80 5.58 3.65 80 0.0007 0.0032 0.0056

The shape of the curve obtained with a colour of 40 p.p.m. somewhat resembled that of a mono-molecular reaction and the results were calculated accordingly. The mathematical expression of this law is dN/dt = KN where N is the concentration of the available chlorine in parts per million. Integrating between t1 and t2 the formula K = log(N1/N2)/(t2 - t1) is obtained. If the compound absorbing the chlorine were simple in character, and the chlorine were present in large excess, the value of K would be constant. In the experiments recorded, K constantly decreases, due to the decreasing concentrations of the reacting substances and the complex nature of the organic matter.The results show the effect of organic matter on the reduction of the chlorine concentration available for germicidal action and also the importance of avoiding a local excess of chlorine (vide p. 41).

An effort has been made by some observers to find a quantitative relation between the organic matter, expressed as oxygen absorbed in parts per million, and the chlorine required for oxidation, but without definite result. Some of the results obtained are given in Table VII.

TABLE VII.—OXYGEN TO CHLORINE RATIO

Observer.
Oxygen Absorbed
Ratio ————————.
Chlorine Absorbed
Rouquette 1
Bonjean 0 .5
Orticoni Less than 1
Valeski and Elmanovitsch 0 .4
Race 0 .4
Theoretical 0 .22

The value of 0.4 (0.39) obtained by the author is the average of over one hundred determinations covering a period of two years. The experiments of Zaleski and Elmanovitsch were made with the water of the Neva River.

The divergence in the ratios affords additional evidence in favor of reaction (2) mentioned on page 28 and also shows that the chlorinated compounds are less readily oxidized than those from which they are produced. Heise[8] has found that the amount of chlorine consumed is usually proportional to the concentration in which it is added though not necessarily a function of the concentration of the organic matter.Temperature. The evidence regarding the effect of temperature upon the dosage required is somewhat conflicting. Ellms (vide supra) found that the velocity of the germicidal action varied directly with the temperature and this has also been the author’s experience with laboratory experiments. Typical examples of these are given in Tables VIII and IX.

TABLE VIII.[B]—EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE

Available Chlorine 0.4 Part Per Million
Contact Period. Temperature, degrees, Fahrenheit.
36 70 98
Nil 424 424 424
5 minutes 320 280 240
1.5 hours 148 76 12
4.5 hours 38 14 3
24 hours 2 0 0
48 hours 2 0 0
[B] Results are B. coli per 10 c.cms.

TABLE IX.[C]— EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE

Available Chlorine 0.2 Parts Per Million
Contact Period. Temperature, degrees, Fahrenheit.
36 70 98
Nil 240 240 240
5 minutes 240 250 235
1 hour 245 235 195
4 hours 215 190 170
24 hours 143 130 115
48 hours 130 59 19
72 hours ... 28 ...
96 hours ... 16 ...
120 hours ... 6 ...
[C] Results are B. coli per 10 c.cms.

The reaction velocity of a germicide is proportional to the temperature[9] and the influence of temperature may be mathematically expressed by the formula K1/K2 = ?(T2 - T1), in which K1 and K2 are the constants of the reaction at temperatures T2 and T1, respectively, and ? is the temperature coefficient. From the value of ?, the velocity constant of a germicide for any temperature may be calculated from the equation KT = K20° × ?(T - T20°). K1 and K2 are obtained from the formula KT = log(N1/N2)/(t2 - t1) in which N1 - N2 is the number of bacteria destroyed in the interval t2 - t1.

A reduction of temperature also lowers the oxidizing activity of the chlorine so that a greater concentration is available for germicidal action. This is shown by the results plotted in Diagram II.

DIAGRAM II
EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON ABSORPTION OF CHLORINE BY WATER

AbsorptionofChlorinebywater
containing40p.p.m.ofcolour
ValueofKcalculatedfrom
absorptionat63°F.
K= Log(N1/N2)
t2-t1
Timeof
Contact
Minutes
TemperatureofWater t2
minutes
t1=0 t1=5 t1=10
32°F. 46°F. 63°F.
Nil 10.00 10.00 10.00
5 8.00 7.45 6.50 5 0.0374 —— ——
10 7.23 7.09 5.91 10 0.0228 0.0082 ——
20 7.00 6.60 5.18 20 0.0190 0.0066 0.0057
40 6.42 6.05 4.47 40 0.0087 0.0043 0.0040
60 6.22 5.60 3.90 60 0.0068 0.0040 0.0036
80 6.13 5.40 3.65 80 0.0056 0.0033 0.0029

Tables VIII and IX, however, show that the temperature coefficient of the germicidal action has a greater effect than the reduction in the amount of chlorine absorbed and removed from the reaction.

The results obtained on the works scale with these waters are very different to the laboratory ones and show that more chlorine is required during the summer season than in winter. The results with bleach and liquid chlorine are in the same direction (vide Diagrams III and IV). The bleach was regulated so as to maintain a constant purity, whilst in the other case the dosage was constant with a varying B. coli content. In Diagram IV the B. coli is plotted; this does not represent all the factors involved as the B. coli content of the treated water is also a function of that of the raw water, but in the example given this factor is of no moment because it was comparatively constant during the period plotted (extreme variation 80 per cent).

The discrepancies between the laboratory and works results cannot be easily explained. The only difference in the conditions is the nature of the containing vessel. Glass is practically inert at all temperatures but the iron pipes, through which the water passed before the samples were taken, may exert an absorptive influence on the chlorine at the higher temperatures experienced during the summer months.

Waters containing organic matter that differs much in quantity from the examples above may yield very different results and no generalisation can be made that will cover all cases. An increase of temperature increases the germicidal velocity and also the rate of absorption of chlorine by the organic matter; other factors determine which of these competitive actions predominates.Method of Application (admixture). A thorough admixture of the water and chlorine is a sine qua non for successful operation. This should, if possible, be attained by natural means, but if there is any doubt as to the efficiency of the mixing process, mechanical appliances should be utilised. Pumps, especially centrifugal pumps, constitute a very convenient and efficacious method of mixing the germicide and the water, and the solutions should never be injected into the discharge pipes when it is possible to make connections with the suctions.

DIAGRAM III
EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE

EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE

DIAGRAM IV
EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE

EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE

Inefficient admixture leads to local concentration of the chlorine, a condition which (vide p. 35), results in a wastage of the disinfectant. Two practical examples of this effect may be cited. In one case the water was free from colour and contained very little organic matter. This water was chlorinated at one plant by allowing the bleach solution to drop into one vertical limb of a syphon approximately 6,000 feet long, the other vertical limb being used as a suction well for the pumps which discharged into the distribution mains. At the other plant the bleach solution was injected into the discharge pipe of a reciprocating pump through a pipe perforated with a number of small holes. The results for two typical months are given in Table X.

TABLE X.—EFFECT OF EFFICIENT MIXING

Month. Available
Chlorine
Parts Per
Million.
Bacteria Per c.cm. B. Coli Index
Per 100 c.cms.
Raw Water. Treated Water.
A. B. A. B. A. B.
July 0.20 0.25 864 27 93 <0.2 8.5
August 0.20 0.27 1.108 12 120 <0.2 10.2
A = efficient mixing. B = inefficient mixing.

The results with the “B” plant were very irregular. The hypochlorite and water did not mix thoroughly and, as several suctions pipes were situated in the suction shaft, there was no subsequent admixture in the pumps; this also caused complaints regarding taste and odour but the complaints were localised, and not general as would result from an overdose of solution due to irregularities at the plant.

The second example deals with a water containing 40-45 p.p.m. of colour. This supply was taken from the river by low-lift pumps and discharged into a header which was connected with the high-lift pumps by two intake pipes about 5,000 feet in length. During 1914 a baffled storage basin of two hours capacity was constructed and in June the hypochlorite was added at the inlet to this basin by means of a perforated pipe. The object was to increase the contact period prior to the delivery of the water into the header. The results for this month were as follows:

Available Chlorine 1.88 Parts Per Million
Bacteria Per c.cm. Agar. B. Coli. Index Per c.cm.
3 Days at 20 C. 1 day at 37 C.
Raw water 410 104 0 .280
Treated water 49 26 0 .036
Percentage purification 88 .2 75 .0 87 .5

During August the point of application of the hypochlorite was changed from the inlet of the basin to the suctions of the pumps and the solution proportioned to the amount of water pumped by the starch and iodide test. The average of the daily tests for this month were:

Available Chlorine 1.55 Parts Per Million
Bacteria Per c.cm. Agar. B. Coli. Index Per c.cm.
3 Days at 20 C. 1 day at 37 C.
Raw water 448 100 0 .600
Treated water 26 12 0 .005
Percentage purification 91 .9 88 .0 99 .2

Here again thorough admixture produced better results than inefficient admixture plus a longer contact period. Langer[10] has also noted the effect of local concentration and found that the disinfecting action is increased by adding the bleach solution in fractions, a cumulative effect replacing that of concentration.

The importance of the admixture factor was not thoroughly appreciated during the earlier periods of chlorination but later installations, and particularly the liquid chlorine ones, have been designed to take full advantage of it.

The point of application in American water-works practice varies considerably (Longley[11]). In 57 per cent of those cases in which it is employed as an adjunct to filtration, it is used in the final treatment; in 26 per cent it is used after coagulation or sedimentation and before filtration; in the remaining 17 per cent it is applied before coagulation and filtration. The report of the committee adds: “The data at hand do not give any reasons for the application before coagulation. In general, an effective disinfection may be secured with a smaller quantity of hypochlorite, if it is applied after rather than before filtration. It should be noted that the storage of chlorinated water in coagulating basins, and its passage through filters, tend to lessen tastes and odors contributed by the treatment and this fact may in some cases account for its use in this way.”Contact Period. Other things being equal, the efficiency of the treatment will vary directly, within certain limits, with the contact period. When a chlorinated water has to be pumped to the distribution mains directly after treatment, the dosage must be high enough to secure the desired standard of purity within twenty to thirty minutes. The chlorine is sometimes not completely absorbed in this period and may cause complaints as to tastes and odours. The examples given above show that the lack of contact period can be largely compensated by ensuring proper admixture. Experience has amply demonstrated that there is no necessity to use heroic doses for water that is delivered for consumption almost immediately after treatment, and that, with proper supervision, complaints can be almost entirely prevented.The general effect of the effect of contact period is shown in Tables VIII and IX on page 37. Another example of a coloured water is given in Table XI, whilst Table XII shows the results obtained with a colourless water.

TABLE XI.[D]—EFFECT OF CONTACT PERIOD

Contact Period. Chlorine, Parts Per Million.
0.30 0.40 0.55 1.21
Nil 3,800 ... ... ...
1 minute 1,400 120 0 0
10 minutes 720 5 0 0
20 minutes 35 0 0 0
[D] Results are B. coli per 10 c.cms.

TABLE XII.—EFFECT OF CONTACT PERIOD

Available Chlorine 0.27 Part Per Million
Sampling Point. Bacteria
Per c.cm.
Average
of
series
of
samples
5,000 ft. from pumping station 300
6,000 203
7,000 103
12,000 86
14,000 87

Table XIII is taken from the work of Wesbrook et al.[4]

TABLE XIII.[E]—TREATMENT OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER WATER

Aug. 8, 1910
AvailableCl.
P.p.m.
ContactPeriod.(Temp.22°-26°C.).
30Mins. 1Hr.
30Mins.
3Hrs. 6Hrs.
30Mins.
24Hrs.
0 230,000 200,000 160,000 150,000 140,000
0 .5 14,000 7,400 2,000 6,000 11,000
1 .0 20 14 170 450 60,000
1 .5 10 6 16 45 70,000
2 .0 7 8 10 97 70,000
2 .5 7 14 30 116 65,000
3 .0 6 12 5 12 16,500
[E] Results are bacteria per c.cm.

In Tables VIII, IX, XI, and XII, the bacteria decreased constantly with increase of contact period, but the results in Table XIII show that no advantage was to be gained by prolonging the contact beyond three hours; after this period the bacteria commenced to increase in number and when twenty-four hours had elapsed the number approached the original. This increase in the bacteria is technically known as “aftergrowth” and will be discussed more fully in Chapter IV.

The replies to queries sent out by the Committee on Water Supplies of the American Public Health Association[11] indicate that the contact period after treatment varies considerably in American water-works practice. Forty per cent of the replies indicated no storage after treatment; 18 per cent less than one hour; 9 per cent from one to three hours; 5 per cent three to twelve hours; 11 per cent twelve to twenty-four hours, and 17 per cent a storage of more than twenty-four hours.Turbidity is usually considered to exert an effect upon the dosage required but no definite evidence has been adduced in support of this hypothesis. Turbidity is generally caused by the presence of very finely divided suspended matter, usually silt or clay, which is inert to hypochlorites. The condition that produces turbidity, however, produces a concomitant increase in the pollution and some of the organisms are embedded in mineral or organic material that prevents access of the chlorine to the organisms which consequently survive treatment. A larger concentration is required to meet these conditions but it is not necessitated by the turbidity per se.Effect of Light. Light exerts a marked photo-chemical effect on the germicidal velocity of chlorine and hypochlorites. When chlorinated water is passed through closed conduits and basins the effect of light is of course nil but in open conduits and reservoirs this factor is appreciable and reduces the necessary contact period. The effect of light on laboratory experiments made with colourless glass bottles is so marked as to make it impossible to compare the results obtained on different days under different actinic conditions. The following figures illustrate the effect of sunlight:

EFFECT OF SUNLIGHT

Contact Period. Available Chlorine 0.35 p.p.m.
Exposed to Bright
Sunlight (April)
Stored in Dark
Cupboard.
Nil 215 215
30 minutes 130 145
1 hour 122 136
2 1/2 hours 61 130
3 1/2 hours 0 32

Determination of Dosage Required. The dosage required for the treatment of a water can only be accurately determined by treating samples with various amounts of chlorine and estimating the number of bacteria and B. coli after an interval of time equal to that available in practice. The temperature of the water during the experiment should be the same as that of the water at the time of sampling.

In order to limit the range covered by the experiments the approximate dosage can be ascertained from Diagram V if the amount of oxygen absorbed by the water is known. This diagram is calculated on the amount of available chlorine, present as chlorine or hypochlorite, that will reduce the B. coli content to the U. S. Treasury standard (2 B. coli per 100 c.cms.) in two hours. If the oxygen absorbed values are determined by the four-hour test at 27° C. they should be multiplied by two.

DIAGRAM V
RELATION OF DOSAGE TO OXYGEN ABSORBED

Relation of dosage to oxygen absorbed

Another method which has been generally adopted for military work during the war, consists in the addition of definite volumes of a standard chlorine solution to several samples of the water and, after a definite interval, testing for the presence of free chlorine by the starch-iodide reaction. The details of the method of Gascard and Laroche, which is used by the French sanitary service, have been given by Comte.[12] One hundred c.cms. of the water to be examined are placed in each of 5 vessels and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 drops of dilute Eau de Javelle (1:100) are added and the contents stirred. After twenty minutes, 1 c.cm. of potassium iodide-starch reagent (1 gram each of starch, potassium, iodide and crystallized sodium carbonate to 100 c.cms.) is added and the samples again stirred. The lowest dilution showing a definite blue colour is regarded as the dose required, and the number of drops is identical with that required of the undiluted Eau de Javelle for 10 litres of water when the same dropping instrument is used. The actual concentration represented by these dilutions depends necessarily upon the size of the drops and the strength of the undiluted Eau de Javelle, but one drop per 100 c.cms. usually represents approximately 1 p.p.m.In Horrocks’s method, as used in the British army, a standard bleach solution is added and is almost immediately followed by the zinc iodide-starch reagent. The two methods were compared by Massy,[13] who found that the French method gave an average result of only 0.06 m.gr. per litre (0.06 p.p.m.) higher than the English method. Water in the Gallipoli campaign required from 0.21 to 1.06 p.p.m. as determined by both methods.

DiÉnert, Director of the Paris Service for investigating drinking water, adds 3 p.p.m. of available chlorine and allows the mixture to stand fifteen minutes after shaking; the residual chlorine is then titrated with thiosulphate. The amount absorbed is increased by 0.5 p.p.m. and in the opinion of DiÉnert this dosage is correct for a contact period of three hours.

For military camps where a standpipe usually provides a reasonable contact period, it has been found good practice to add sufficient chlorine to give a rich blue colour with the starch-iodide reagent and subsequently reduce the dosage gradually until the water, after standing one hour, gives but a faint reaction to the test reagent. This method should be checked up as soon as possible by bacteriological examinations. An example of this method is given in Table XIV.

TABLE XIV.—CONTROL OF DOSAGE BY STARCH-
IODIDE REACTION

Starch-iodide
Reaction
After One Hour.
Bacteria on Agar Per c.cm. B. Coli Per
100 c.cms.
1 Day at 37 C. 2 Days at 20 C.
000?? 40 15 0
0000? 37 18 8
00000 68 268 34
00000 115 553 61
Raw water 114 685 89
The number of ? signs indicates the intensity of the reaction.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

[1] Nissen. Zeit. f. Hyg., 1890, 8, 62.[2] DelÉpine, J. Soc. Chem. Ind., 1911, 29, 1350.[3] Phelps. Water Supply Paper No. 220, U. S. Geo. Survey.[4] Wesbrook, Whittaker, and Mohler, J. Amer. Public Health Assoc., 1911, 1, 123.[5] Lederer and Bachmann. Eng. Rec., 1912, 65, 360.[6] Harrington. J. Amer. Waterworks Assoc., 1914, 1, 438.[7] Ellms. Eng. Rec., 1911, 63, 472.[8] Heise. Philippine Jour. Sci., 1917, 12, A, 17-34.[9] Norton and Hsu, Jour. Inf. Dis., 1916, 18, 180.[10] Langer. Zeit. f. Hyg., 1916, 81, 296.[11] Longley. J. Amer. Public Health Assoc., 1915, 5, 920.[12] Comte. J. Pharm. Chim., 1916, 14, 261.[13] Massy. J. Pharm. Chim., 1917, 15, 209.


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

Clyx.com


Top of Page
Top of Page