145 FÉe says that it is only some few years since the inner bark of the elm was sometimes prescribed medicinally, but that it has now completely fallen into disuse. All that Pliny says here of the virtues of the elm is entirely suppositious. 281 FÉe thinks that the copyists have made a mistake in this passage, and that the reading should be “aquifolia,” the same plant that is mentioned afterwards under that name. He identifies them with the Ilex aquifolium, or holly. See B. xvi. cc. 8, 12, where Pliny evidently confounds the holm oak with the holly. 418 Hardouin identifies it with the Ulva lactuca of LinnÆus; but that plant, FÉe says, contains no milky juice, and does not act as an emetic. One of the EuphorbiaceÆ is probably meant. 574 Hardouin identifies it with the Geranium Robertianum of LinnÆus; Sprengel and Desfontaines with the Phellandrium mutellina of LinnÆus; Columna with the Sanicula; Sibthorp with the Scrofularia lucida; and M. FraÄs with the Scrofula chrysanthemifolia of LinnÆus. FÉe expresses himself unable to speak with any certainty on the subject. 717 In B. xxii. c. 37. 858 The Corchorus of B. xxi. c. 106, is most probably altogether a different plant. 1017 “Osculi”, “kissing;” a nauseous and silly practice, still adhered to, between bearded men even, in many parts of Europe. 1177 He is in error here. 1338 See B. xxv. c. 56. 1516 See B. xxv. c. 90. 1697 See end of B. xx. 1840 Desfontaines identifies it with the Centaurea crocodileum of LinnÆus, and LittrÉ with the Carduus pycnocephalus of LinnÆus. Ruellius considers it to be the same plant as the Leucacantha of Dioscorides; which Sprengel identifies with the Cnicus CasabonÆ. FÉe expresses himself at a loss as to its identity. 1983 See B. xxii. c. 91. FÉe thinks that it is two plants, the Cnicus CasabonÆ, and the Thelygonum cynocrambe of LinnÆus, that are here spoken of. LittrÉ gives the Mercurialis perennis of LinnÆus, Dog’s mercury, as its synonym. 2135 King Attalus Philometor. See end of B. viii. 2284 In B. viii. c. 50. 2441 See end of B. iii. 2592 The same is said of a frog’s tongue, in B. xxxii. c. 18. 2742 That this art was still practised in secret in the days of Pliny himself, we learn from the testimony of Tacitus (Annals, II. 69), in his account of the enquiries instituted on the death of Germanicus. 2898 See end of B. ii. 3043 “Aqua Virgo.” This aqueduct, erected A.U.C. 735, still exists, and bears the name of “Aqua Vergine.” 3189 Beckmann thinks that these kinds of water were in reality only impure and not potable, from their nauseous taste, and that hence they were considered as nitrous. Nitrous water, he remarks, or water containing saltpetre, in all probability, does not exist. Vol. II. pp. 498-9. Bohn’s Edition. END OF VOL. V. J. BILLING, PRINTER AND STEREOTYPER (FROM WOKING), GUILDFORD, SURREY. Transcriber’s Notes:— The spelling, hyphenation, punctuation and accentuation are as the original, except for apparent typographical errors which have been corrected. The footnotes for each of the six volumes have been renumbered, the references to notes in other volumes have been changed accordingly. In footnote [24] “See Introduction to Vol. III.” probably refers to the glossary of “GREEK AND ROMAN MONEY, WEIGHTS, AND MEASURES MENTIONED BY PLINY.” which follows the Contents section of Volume III. |