VII. A. The account of this case, given by Mr. E. Mamtchitch, is taken from the "Report on the Census of Hallucinations" in the Proceedings S.P.R., vol. x. pp. 387-91. St. Petersburg, April 29th, 1891. Comme il s'agira des apparitions de Palladia, je dois dire auparavant quelques mots sur sa personne. Elle Était la fille d'un riche propriÉtaire russe, mort un mois avant sa naissance. Sa mÈre, dans son dÉsespoir, voua son enfant futur au couvent. De lÀ son nom, usitÉ parmi les religieuses. Deux ans aprÈs, sa mÈre mourut, et l'orpheline, jusqu'À l'Âge de 14 ans, fut ÉlevÉe dans un couvent de Moscou par sa tante, qui en Était la supÉrieure. En 1870, Étant encore Étudiant À l'universitÉ de Moscou, je fis la connaissance du frÈre de Palladia, Étudiant comme moi, et il fut souvent question entre nous de rendre À la sociÉtÉ la nonne malgrÉ soi; mais ce plan ne fut rÉalisÉ qu'en 1872. J'Étais venu en ÉtÉ À Moscou, pour voir l'exposition, et j'y rencontrai par hasard le frÈre de Palladia. J'appris qu'il Était en train de l'envoyer en CrimÉe pour cause de santÉ, et je le secondai de mon mieux. C'est alors que je vis Palladia pour la premiÈre fois; elle avait 14 ans; quoique haute de taille, elle Était fort chÉtive et dÉjÀ poitrinaire. A la priÈre de son frÈre, j'accompagnai Palladia et sa soeur, Mme. P. S., en CrimÉe, oÙ elles restÈrent pour passer l'hiver et moi, deux semaines aprÈs, je revins À Kieff. En ÉtÉ 1873 je rencontrai par hasard Palladia et sa soeur À Odessa, oÙ elles Étaient venues pour consulter les mÉdecins, quoique Palladia avait l'air de se porter assez bien. Le 27 AoÛt, pendant que je faisais la lecture aux deux dames, Palladia mourut subitement d'un anÉvrisme, À l'Âge de 15 ans. Deux ans aprÈs la mort de Palladia, en 1875, me trouvant À Kieff, il m'arriva, par une soirÉe du mois de DÉcembre, d'assister pour la premiÈre fois À une sÉance spiritique; j'entendis des coups dans la table; cela ne m'Étonna nullement, car j'Était sÛr que c'Était une plaisanterie. De retour chez moi, je voulus voir si les mÊmes coups se produiraient chez moi; je me mis dans la mÊme pose, les mains sur la table. BientÔt des coups se firent entendre. Imitant le procÉdÉ dont j'avais ÉtÉ le tÉmoin, Depuis ce moment, il me fut prouvÉ À l'Évidence qu'il y a un autre monde avec lequel, je ne sais comment, nous pouvons entrer en rapport, et dont les habitants peuvent nous donner de telles preuves de leur existence qu'elles dÉsarment le scepticisme le plus tenace. En Octobre, 1876, je me trouvais À Kieff, et j'Étais en train de m'installer dans un nouveau logement (rue ProrÉsnaya) avec mon camarade de service au MinistÈre de la Justice, M. Potolof. On venait de m'apporter un pianino. Il fut placÉ dans la salle, et je me mis À jouer; il Était À peu prÈs 8 h. du soir; la salle oÙ je jouais Était ÉclairÉe par une lampe pendue au mur. A cÔtÉ se trouvait mon cabinet de travail, ÉclairÉ aussi par une lampe. Je me rappelle trÈs bien que j'Étais de fort bonne humeur. Mon camarade, M. Potolof, Était occupÉ À sa table, À l'autre bout du logis. Toutes les portes Étaient ouvertes, et de sa place il pouvait voir trÈs bien le cabinet et la salle oÙ je jouais. AprÈs la premiÈre apparition de Palladia, en Octobre, 1876, et jusqu'À prÉsent, je la vois souvent. Il arrive que je la vois trois fois par semaine, ou deux fois le mÊme jour, ou bien un mois se passe sans la voir. En rÉsumÉ, voilÀ les traits principaux de ces apparitions. (1) Palladia apparait toujours d'une faÇon inattendue, me prenant comme par surprise, juste au moment quand j'y pense le moins. (2) Quand je veux la voir moi-mÊme, j'ai beau y penser ou le vouloir—elle n'apparait pas. (3) A de rares exceptions, son apparition n'a aucun rapport avec le courant de ma vie, comme prÉsage ou avertissement de quelqu'ÉvÉnement insolite. (4) Jamais je ne la vois en songe. (5) Je la vois Également quand je suis seul, ou en grande compagnie. (6) Elle m'apparait toujours avec la mÊme expression sereine des yeux; quelque fois avec un faible sourire. Elle ne m'a jamais parlÉ, À l'exception de deux fois, que je vais raconter plus loin. (7) Je la vois toujours dans la robe foncÉe qu'elle portait lorsqu'elle mourut sous mes yeux. Je vois distinctement son visage, sa tÊte, les Épaules et les bras, mais je ne vois pas ses pieds, ou plutÔt je n'ai pas le temps de les examiner. (8) Chaque fois, en voyant Palladia inopinÉment, je perds la parole, je sens du froid dans le dos, je pÂlis, je m'Écrie faiblement, et ma respiration s'arrÊte (c'est ce que me disent ceux qui par hasard m'ont observÉ pendant ce moment). (9) L'apparition de Palladia se prolonge une, deux, trois minutes, puis graduellement elle s'efface et se dissout dans l'espace. A prÉsent je vais dÉcrire trois cas d'apparitions de Palladia dont je me souviens bien. (1) En 1879, À la fin de Novembre, À Kieff, j'Étais assis À mon bureau À Écrire un acte d'accusation; il Était 8-1/4 du soir, la montre Était devant moi sur la table. Je me hÂtais de finir mon travail, car À 9 h. je devais me rendre À une soirÉe. Tout À coup, en face de moi, assise sur un fauteuil, je vis Palladia; elle avait le coude du bras droit sur la table et la tÊte appuyÉe sur la main. M'Étant remis de mon saisissement, je regardai la montre et je suivis le mouvement de l'aiguille À seconde, puis je relevai (2) En 1885, je demeurais chez mes parents, À une campagne du gouvernement de Poltava. Une dame de notre connaissance Était venue passer chez nous quelques jours avec ses deux demoiselles. Quelque temps aprÈs leur arrivÉe, m'Étant rÉveillÉ À l'aube du jour, je vis Palladia (je dormais dans une aile sÉparÉe oÙ j'Étais tout seul). Elle se tenait devant moi, À cinq pas À peu prÈs, et me regardait avec un sourire joyeux. S'Étant approchÉe de moi, elle me dit deux mots: "J'ai ÉtÉ, j'ai vu," et tout en souriant disparut. Que voulaient dire ces mots, je ne pus le comprendre. Dans ma chambre dormait avec moi mon setter. DÈs que j'aperÇus Palladia, le chien hÉrissa le poil et avec glapissement sauta sur mon lit; se pressant vers moi, il regardait dans la direction oÙ je voyais Palladia. Le chien n'aboyait pas, tandis que, ordinairement, il ne laissait personne entrer dans la chambre sans aboyer et grogner. Et toutes les fois, quand mon chien voyait Palladia, il se pressait auprÈs de moi, comme cherchant un refuge. Quand Palladia disparut et je vins dans la maison, je ne dis rien À personne de cette incident. Le soir de mÊme jour, la fille aÎnÉe de la dame qui se trouvait chez nous me raconta qu'une chose Étrange lui Était arrivÉe ce matin: "M'Étant rÉveillÉe de grand matin," me dit-elle, "j'ai senti comme si quelqu'un se tenait au chevet de mon lit, et j'entendis distinctement une voix me disant: 'Ne me crains pas, je suis bonne et aimante.' Je tournai la tÊte, mais je ne vis rien; ma mÈre et ma soeur dormaient tranquillement; cela m'a fort ÉtonnÉe, car jamais rien de pareil ne m'est arrivÉ." Sur quoi je rÉpondis que bien des choses inexplicables nous arrivent; mais je ne lui dit rien de ce que j'avais vu le matin. Seulement un an plus tard, quand j'Étais dÉjÀ son fiancÉ, je lui fis part de l'apparition et des paroles de Palladia le mÊme jour. N'Était-ce pas elle qui Était venue la voir aussi? Je dois ajouter que j'avais vu alors cette demoiselle pour la premiÈre fois et que je ne pensais pas du tout que j'allais l'Épouser. (3) En Octobre, 1890, je me trouvais avec ma femme et mon fils, ÂgÉ de deux ans, chez mes anciens amis, les Strijewsky, À leur campagne EugÈne Mamtchitch. Mrs. Mamtchitch writes:— 5 Mai, 1891. Je me rappelle trÈs bien que le 10 Juillet 1885, lorsque nous Étions en visite chez les parents de M. E. Mamtchitch, je m'Étais rÉveillÉe À l'aube du jour, car il avait ÉtÉ convenu entre moi et ma soeur que nous irions faire une promenade matinale. M'Étant soulevÉe sur le lit, je vis que maman et ma soeur dormaient, et en ce moment je sentis comme si quelqu'un se tenait À mon chevet. M'Étant tournÉe À demi—car je craignais de bien regarder—je ne vis personne; m'Étant recouchÉe, j'entendis immÉdiatement, derriÈre et au dessus de ma tÊte, une voix de femme me disant doucement, mais distinctement: "Ne me crains pas, je suis bonne et aimante," et encore toute une phrase que j'oubliai À l'instant mÊme. ImmÉdiatement aprÈs je m'habillai et j'allai me promener. C'est Étrange que ces paroles ne m'effrayÈrent pas du tout. De retour, je n'en dis rien ni À ma mÈre, ni À ma soeur, car elles n'aimaient pas de telles choses et n'y croyaient pas; mais le soir du mÊme jour, comme la conversation tourna sur le spiritisme, je racontai À M. M. ce qui venait de m'arriver le matin; il ne me rÉpondit rien de particulier. Je n'ai jamais eu aucune hallucination, ni avant, ni aprÈs cet incident, À l'exception d'un cas tout rÉcent, quand je me suis vue moi-mÊme, de quoi je parlerai une autre fois. Sophie Mamtchitch. Mr. Potolof writes to Mr. Aksakoff, through whom the case was sent:— Rue Schpalernaya, 26. S. PÉtersbourg, le 10 Mai, 1891. MONSIEUR,—En rÉponse À votre lettre du 8 Mai et les questions que vous me posez relativement À l'incident avec M. E. Mamtchitch, lorsque dans les annÉes 1876-77 nous habitions ensemble Kieff, rue Proresnaya, maison Barsky, je puis vous communiquer ce qui suit. Effectivement, je fus alors tÉmoin comme M. M., pendant qu'il jouait un soir du piano quelque air mÉlancolique, s'interrompait brusquement (comme si aprÈs avoir fortement attaquÉ le clavier, ses mains s'Étaient subitement affaissÉes), et lorsque je vins lui demander ce qui lui Était arrivÉ, il me rÉpondit qu'il venait de voir apparaÎtre le fantÔme de Palladia, se tenant derriÈre la draperie de la porte de la chambre contigue À celle oÙ se trouvait W. Potolof. Note by Mr. Aksakoff:— S. PÉtersbourg, Le 16"28 Mai, 1891. Traduit des manuscrits russes de M. et Madame Mamtchitch, et de M. Potolof. La premiÈre partie du manuscrit de M. Mamtchitch, jusqu'À la premiÈre apparition de Palladia, est abrÉgÉ. J'avais rencontrÉ M. Mamtchitch plusieurs fois, mais je n'avais aucune idÉe de ces apparitions constantes de Palladia. M. Mamtchitch a vu aussi d'autres figures que celle de Palladia, mais je n'ai pas eu le temps d'en faire un mÉmorandum circonstantiel. A. Aksakoff. VII. B. The account, which I quote from Proceedings S.P.R., vol. vi. p. 17, was sent in 1887 to the American Society for Psychical Research by Mr. F. G., of Boston. Professor Royce and Dr. Hodgson vouch for the high character and good position of the informants; and it will be seen that, besides the percipient himself, his father and brother are first-hand witnesses as regards the most important point,—the effect produced by a certain symbolic item in the phantom's aspect. Mr. G. writes:— January 11th, 1888. SIR,—Replying to the recently published request of your Society for actual occurrences of psychical phenomena, I respectfully submit the following remarkable occurrence to the consideration of your distinguished Society, with the assurance that the event made a more powerful impression on my mind than the combined incidents of my whole life. I have never mentioned it outside of my family and a few intimate friends, knowing well that few would believe it, or else ascribe it to some disordered state of my mind at the time; but I well know I never was in better health or possessed a clearer head and mind than at the time it occurred. In 1867 my only sister, a young lady of eighteen years, died suddenly of cholera in St. Louis, Mo. My attachment for her was very strong, and the blow a severe one to me. A year or so after her death the writer became a commercial traveller, and it was in 1876, while on one of my Western trips, that the event occurred. I had "drummed" the city of St. Joseph, Mo., and had gone to my room at the Pacific House to send in my orders, which were unusually large ones, so that I was in a very happy frame of mind indeed. My Now comes the most remarkable confirmation of my statement, which cannot be doubted by those who know what I state actually occurred. This visitation, or whatever you may call it, so impressed me that I took the next train home, and in the presence of my parents and others I related what had occurred. My father, a man of rare good sense and very practical, was inclined to ridicule me, as he saw how earnestly I believed what I stated; but he, too, was amazed when later on I told them of a bright red line or scratch on the right-hand side of my sister's face, which I distinctly had seen. When I mentioned this my mother rose trembling to her feet and nearly fainted away, and as soon as she sufficiently recovered her self-possession, with tears streaming down her face, she exclaimed that I had indeed seen my sister, as no living mortal but herself was aware of that scratch, which she had accidentally made while doing some little act of kindness after my sister's death. She said she well remembered how pained she was to think she should have, unintentionally, marred the features of her dead daughter, and that, unknown to all, how she had carefully obliterated all traces of the slight scratch with the aid of powder, etc., and that she had never mentioned it to a human being from that day to this. In proof, neither my father nor any of our family had detected it, and positively were unaware of the incident, yet I saw the scratch as bright as if just made. So strangely impressed was my mother, that even after she had retired to rest she got up and dressed, came to me and told me she knew at least that I had seen my sister. A few weeks later my mother died, happy in her belief she would rejoin her favourite daughter in a better world. In a further letter Mr. F. G. adds:— There was nothing of a spiritual or ghostly nature in either the form or dress of my sister, she appearing perfectly natural, and dressed in You are correct in understanding that I returned home earlier than I had intended, as it had such an effect on me that I could hardly think of any other matter; in fact, I abandoned a trip that I had barely commenced, and, ordinarily, would have remained on the road a month longer. Mr. F. G. again writes to Dr. Hodgson, January 23rd, 1888:— As per your request, I enclose a letter from my father which is indorsed by my brother, confirming the statement I made to them of the apparition I had seen. I will add that my father is one of the oldest and most respected citizens of St. Louis, Mo., a retired merchant, whose winter residence is at——, Ills., a few miles out by rail. He is now seventy years of age, but a remarkably well-preserved gentleman in body and mind, and a very learned man as well. As I informed you, he is slow to believe things that reason cannot explain. My brother, who indorses the statement, has resided in Boston for twelve years, doing business on—— Street, as per letter-head above, and the last man in the world to take stock in statements without good proof. The others who were present (including my mother) are now dead, or were then so young as to now have but a dim remembrance of the matter. You will note that my father refers to the "scratch," and it was this that puzzled all, even himself, and which we have never been able to account for, further than that in some mysterious way I had actually seen my sister nine years after death, and had particularly noticed and described to my parents and family this bright red scratch, and which, beyond all doubt in our minds, was unknown to a soul save my mother, who had accidentally caused it. When I made my statement, all, of course, listened and were interested; but the matter would probably have passed with comments that it was a freak of memory had not I asked about the scratch, and the instant I mentioned it my mother was aroused as if she had received an electric shock, as she had kept it secret from all, and she alone was able to explain it. My mother was a sincere Christian lady, who was for twenty-five years superintendent of a large infant class in her church, the Southern Methodist, and a directress in many charitable institutions, and was highly educated. No lady at the time stood higher in the city of St. Louis, and she was, besides, a woman of rare good sense. I mention these points to give you an insight into the character and standing of those whose testimony, in such a case, is necessary. (Signed) F. G. From Mr. H. G.:— -----, Ills., January 20th, 1888. Dear F.,—Yours of 16th inst. is received. In reply to your questions relating to your having seen our Annie, while at St. Joseph, Mo., I will state that I well remember the statement you made to family on your return home. I remember your stating how she looked in ordinary home dress, and particularly about the scratch (or red spot) on her face, which you could not account for, but which was fully explained by your mother. The spot was made while adjusting something about her head while in the casket, and covered with powder. All who heard you relate the phenomenal sight thought it was true. You well know how sceptical I am about things which reason cannot explain. (Signed) H. G. (father). I was present at the time and indorse the above. (Signed) K. G. (brother). The apparent redness of the scratch on the face of the apparition goes naturally enough with the look of life in the face. The phantom did not appear as a corpse, but as a blooming girl, and the scratch showed as it would have shown if made during life. Dr. Hodgson visited Mr. F. G. later, and sent us the following notes of his interview:— St. Louis, Mo., April 16th, 1890. In conversation with Mr. F. G., now forty-three years of age, he says that there was a very special sympathy between his mother, sister, and himself. When he saw the apparition he was seated at a small table, about two feet in diameter, and had his left elbow on the table. The scratch which he saw was on the right side of his sister's nose, about three fourths of an inch long, and was a somewhat ragged mark. His home at the time of the incident was in St. Louis. His mother died within two weeks after the incident. His sister's face was hardly a foot away from his own. The sun was shining upon it through the open window. The figure disappeared like an instantaneous evaporation. Mr. G. has had another experience, but of a somewhat different character. Last fall the impression persisted for some time of a lady friend of his, and he could not rid himself for some time of thoughts of her. He found afterwards that she died at the time of the curious persistence of his impression. Mr. G. appears to be a first-class witness. R. Hodgson. I have ranked this case prim facie as a perception by the spirit of her mother's approaching death. That coincidence is too marked to be explained away: the son is brought home in time to see his mother once VII. C. From Proceedings S.P.R., vol. x. pp. 380-82. From Miss L. Dodson:— September 14th, 1891. On June 5th, 1887, a Sunday evening, I was in bed, but not asleep, and the room was lighted by a gaslight in the street outside. I was out of health, and in anxiety about family troubles. My age was forty-two. I was quite alone. I mentioned the circumstance to my uncle the next morning. He thought I was sickening for brain fever. [I have had other experiences, but] only to the extent of having felt a hand laid on my head, and sometimes on my hands, at times of great trouble. Lucy Dodson. Mr. C. H. Cope, who sent the case, wrote in answer to our questions:— BRUSSELS, October 17th, 1891. I have received replies from Miss Dodson to your inquiries. (1) "Yes [I was] perfectly awake [at the time]." (2) "Was she in anxiety about her sister-in-law?" "None whatever; I did not know a second baby had been born; in fact, had not the remotest idea of my sister-in-law's illness." (3) "Did she think at the time that the words about the children's mother having just died referred to her sister-in-law? Had she two children?" "No, I was at a total loss to imagine whose children they were." (4) "I was living in Albany Street, Regent's Park, at the time. My sister-in-law, as I heard afterwards, was confined at St. AndrÉ (near Bruges), and removed to Bruges three days prior to her death. (N.B.—She had two children including the new-born baby.)" (5) "My late uncle only saw business connections, and having no relations or personal friends in London, save myself, would not have been likely to mention the occurrence to any one." Mr. Cope also sent us a copy of the printed announcement of the death, which Miss Dodson had received. It was dated, "Bruges, June 7th, 1887," and gave the date of death as June 5th. He quotes from Miss Dodson's letter to him, enclosing it, as follows: "[My friend], Mrs. Grange, tells me she saw [my sister-in-law] a couple of hours prior to her death, which took place about nine o'clock on the evening of June 5th, and it was between eleven and twelve o'clock the same night my mother brought me the two little children." Professor Sidgwick writes:— November 23rd, 1892. I have just had an interesting conversation with Miss Dodson and her friend, Mrs. Grange. Miss Dodson told me that she was not thinking of her brother or his wife at this time, as her mind was absorbed by certain other matters. But the brother was an object of special concern to her, as her mother on her deathbed, in 1871, had specially charged her—and she had promised—to take care of the other children, especially this brother, who was then five years old. He had married in April, 1885, and she had She is as sure as she can be that she was awake at the time of the experience. She knew the time by a clock in the room and also a clock outside. She heard this latter strike twelve afterwards, and the apparition must have occurred after eleven, because lights were out in front of the public-house. The children seemed to be with her a long time; indeed, they seemed to be still with her when the clock struck twelve. The room was usually light enough to see things in—e.g. to get a glass of water, etc.—owing to the lamp in the street, but the distinctness with which the vision was seen is not explicable by the real light. The children were of ages corresponding to those of her sister-in-law's children, i.e. they seemed to be a little girl and a baby newly born; the sex was not distinguished. She was not at all alarmed. She heard from Mrs. Grange by letter, and afterwards orally from her brother, that her sister-in-law died between eight and nine the same night. She never had any experience of the kind, or any hallucination at all before: but since she has occasionally felt a hand on her head in trouble. Mrs. Grange told me that she was with the sister-in-law about an hour and a half before her death. She left her about seven o'clock, without any particular alarm about her; though she was suffering from inflammation after childbirth, and Mrs. Grange did not quite like her look; still her state was not considered alarming by those who were attending on her. Then about 8.30 news came to Mrs. Grange in her own house that something had happened at the sister-in-law's. As it was only in the next street, Mrs. Grange put on her bonnet and went round to the house, and found she was dead. She then wrote and told Miss Dodson. VII. D. From Proceedings S.P.R., vol. viii. pp. 200-205. The first report of the case appeared in The Herald (Dubuque, Iowa), February 11th, 1891, as follows:— It will be remembered that on February 2nd, Michael Conley, a farmer living near Ionia, Chickasaw County, was found dead in an outhouse at the Jefferson house. He was carried to Coroner Hoffmann's morgue, where, after the inquest, his body was prepared for shipment to his late home. The old clothes which he wore were covered with filth from the place where he was found, and they were thrown outside the morgue on the ground. His son came from Ionia, and took the corpse home. When he reached there, and one of the daughters was told that her father was dead, she fell into a swoon, in which she remained for several hours. When at last she was brought from the swoon, she said, "Where are father's old clothes? He has just appeared to me dressed in a white shirt, black clothes, and The entire family considered it only a hallucination, but the physician advised them to get the clothes, as it might set her mind at rest. The son telephoned Coroner Hoffmann, asking if the clothes were still in his possession. He looked and found them in the backyard, although he had supposed they were thrown in the vault, as he had intended. He answered that he still had them, and on being told that the son would come to get them, they were wrapped in a bundle. The young man arrived last Monday afternoon, and told Coroner Hoffmann what his sister had said. Mr. Hoffmann admitted that the lady had described the identical burial garb in which her father was clad, even to the slippers, although she never saw him after death, and none of the family had seen more than his face through the coffin lid. Curiosity being fully aroused, they took the grey shirt from the bundle, and within the bosom found a large roll of bills sewed with a piece of red cloth. The young man said his sister had a red dress exactly like it. The stitches were large and irregular, and looked to be those of a man. The son wrapped up the garments and took them home with him yesterday morning, filled with wonder at the supernatural revelation made to his sister, who is at present lingering between life and death. Dr. Hodgson communicated with the proprietors of The Herald, and both they and their reporter who had written the account stated that it was strictly accurate. The coroner, Mr. Hoffmann, wrote to Dr. Hodgson on March 18th, 1891, as follows:— In regard to the statements in the Dubuque Herald, about February 19th, about the Conley matter is more than true by my investigation. I laughed and did not believe in the matter when I first heard of it, until I satisfied myself by investigating and seeing what I did. M. M. Hoffmann, County Coroner. Further evidence was obtained through Mr. Amos Crum, pastor of a church at Dubuque. The following statement was made by Mr. Brown, whom Mr. Crum described as "an intelligent and reliable farmer, residing about one mile from the Conleys." IONIA, July 20th, 1891. Elizabeth Conley, the subject of so much comment in the various papers, was born in Chickasaw township, Chickasaw County, Iowa, in March, 1863. Her mother died the same year. Is of Irish parentage; brought up, and is, a Roman Catholic; has been keeping house for her father for ten years. On the 1st day of February, 1891, her father went to Dubuque, Iowa, for medical treatment, and died on the 3rd of the same month very suddenly. His son was notified by telegraph the same day, and he and I started the next morning after the remains, which we found in charge of Coroner Hoffmann. He had 9 dollars 75 cents, which he had taken from his pocket-book. I think it was about two days after our return she had the dream or vision. She claimed her father had appeared to her, and told her there was a sum of money in an inside pocket of his undershirt. Her brother started for Dubuque a few days afterwards, and found the clothes as we had left them, and in the pocket referred to found 30 dollars in currency. These are the facts of the matter as near as I can give them. George Brown. Mr. Crum wrote later:— Dubuque, Iowa, August 15th, 1891. Dear Mr. Hodgson,—I send you in another cover a detailed account of interview with the Conleys. I could not get the doctor. I have had a long talk with Mr. Hoffmann about the Conley incident, and think you have all the facts—and they are facts. The girl Lizzie Conley swooned. She saw her dead father; she heard from him of the money left in his old shirt; she returned to bodily consciousness; she described her father's burial dress, robe, shirt, and slippers exactly, though she had never seen them. She described the pocket in the shirt that had been left for days in the shed at the undertaker's. It was a ragged-edged piece of red cloth clumsily sewn, and in this pocket was found a roll of bill—35 dollars in amount—as taken out by Mr. Hoffmann in presence of Pat Conley, son of the deceased, and brother of the Lizzie Conley whose remarkable dream or vision is the subject of inquiry. Amos Crum, Past. Univ. Ch. ...I herewith transcribe my questions addressed to Miss Elizabeth Conley, and her replies to the same concerning her alleged dream or vision.... On July 17th, about noon, I called at the Conley home near Ionia, Chickasaw County, Iowa, and inquired for Elizabeth Conley. She was present, and engaged in her domestic labours. When I stated the object of my call, she seemed quite reluctant for a moment to engage in conversation. Then she directed a lad who was present to leave the room. She said she would converse with me upon the matter pertaining to her father. Q. What is your age? A. Twenty-eight. Q. What is the state of your health? A. Not good since my father's death. Q. What was the state of your health previous to his death? A. It was good. I was a healthy girl. Q. Did you have dreams, visions, or swoons previous to your father's death? A. Why, I had dreams. Everybody has dreams. Q. Have you ever made discoveries or received other information during your dreams or visions previous to your father's death? A. No. Q. Had there been anything unusual in your dreams or visions previous to your father's death? A. No, not that I know of. Q. Was your father in the habit of carrying considerable sums of money about his person? A. Not that I knew of. Q. Did you know before his death of the pocket in the breast of the shirt worn by him to Dubuque? A. No. Q. Did you wash or prepare that shirt for him to wear on his trip to Dubuque? A. No. It was a heavy woollen undershirt, and the pocket was stitched inside of the breast of it. Q. Will you recite the circumstances connected with the recovery of money from clothing worn by your father at the time of his death? A. (after some hesitation) When they told me that father was dead I felt very sick and bad; I did not know anything. Then father came to me. He had on a white shirt and black clothes and slippers. When I came to, I told Pat [her brother] I had seen father. I asked him (Pat) if he had brought back father's old clothes. He said, "No," and asked me why I wanted them. I told him father said to me he had sewed a roll of bills inside of his grey shirt, in a pocket made of a piece of my old red dress. I went to sleep, and father came to me again. When I awoke I told Pat he must go and get the clothes. Q. While in these swoons did you hear the ordinary conversations or noises in the house about you? A. No. Q. Did you see your father's body after it was placed in its coffin? A. No; I did not see him after he left the house to go to Dubuque. Q. Have you an education? A. No. Q. Can you read and write? A. Oh yes, I can read and write; but I've not been to school much. Q. Are you willing to write out what you have told me of this strange affair? A. Why, I've told you all I know about it. She was averse to writing or to signing a written statement. During the conversation she was quite emotional, and manifested much effort to suppress her feelings. She is a little more than medium size, of Irish parentage, of Catholic faith, and shows by her conversation that her education is limited. Her brother, Pat Conley, corroborates all that she has recited. He is a sincere and substantial man, and has no theory upon which to account for the strange facts that have come to his knowledge. In his presence Coroner Hoffmann, in Dubuque, found the shirt with its pocket of red cloth stitched on the inside with long, straggling, and awkward stitches, just as a dim-sighted old man or an awkward boy might sew it there. The pocket was about 7 [seven] inches deep, and in the pocket of that dirty old shirt that had lain in Hoffmann's back room was a roll of bills amounting to 35 dollars. When the shirt was found with the pocket, as described by his sister after her swoon, and the money as told her by the old man after his death, Pat Conley seemed dazed and overcome by the mystery. Hoffmann says the girl, after her swoon, described exactly Amos Crum, Pastor Univ. Church. If we may accept the details of this narrative, which seems to have been carefully and promptly investigated, we find that the phantasm communicates two sets of facts: one of them known only to strangers (the dress in which he was buried), and one of them known only to himself (the existence of the inside pocket and the money therein). In discussing from what mind these images originate it is, of course, important to note whether any living minds, known or unknown to the percipient, were aware of the facts thus conveyed. There are few cases where the communication between the percipient and the deceased seems to have been more direct than here. The hard, prosaic reality of the details of the message need not, of course, surprise us. On the contrary, the father's sudden death in the midst of earthly business would at once retain his attention on money matters and facilitate his impressing them on the daughter's mind. One wishes that more could be learned of the daughter's condition when receiving the message. It seems to have resembled trance rather than dream. One other case in this group I must quote at length. It illustrates the fact that the cases of deepest interest are often the hardest for the inquirer to get hold of. From the Proceedings S.P.R., vol. x. pp. 385-86. The account of the percipient, Baron B. von Driesen, was written in November, 1890, and has been translated from the Russian by Mr. M. Petrovo-Solovovo, who sent us the case. [Baron von Driesen begins by saying that he has never believed and does not believe in the supernatural, and that he is more inclined to attribute the apparition he saw to his "excited fancy" than to anything else. After these preliminary remarks he proceeds as follows:—] I must tell you that my father-in-law, M. N. J. Ponomareff, died in the country. This did not happen at once, but after a long and painful illness, whose sharp phases had obliged my wife and myself to join him long before his death. I had not been on good terms with M. Ponomareff. Different circumstances, which are out of place in this narrative, had "What do you want?" I asked my father-in-law. M. Ponomareff made two steps forward, stopped before my bed, and said, "Basil Feodorovitch, I have acted wrongly towards you. Forgive me! Without this I do not feel at rest there." He was pointing to the ceiling with his left hand, whilst holding out his right to me. I seized this hand, which was long and cold, shook it, and answered, "Nicholas Ivanovitch, God is my witness that I have never had anything against you." [The ghost of] my father-in-law bowed [or bent down], moved away, and went through the opposite door into the billiard-room, where he disappeared. I looked after him for a moment, crossed myself, put out the candle, and fell asleep with the sense of joy which a man who has done his duty must feel. The morning came. My wife's brothers, as well as our neighbours and the peasants, assembled, and the liturgy was celebrated by our confessor, the Rev. Father Basil. But when all was over, the same Father Basil led me aside, and said to me mysteriously, "Basil Feodorovitch, I have got something to say to you in private." My wife having come near us at this moment, the clergyman repeated his wish. I answered, "Father Basil, I have no secrets from my wife; please tell us what you wished to tell me alone." Then Father Basil, who is living till now in the Koi parish of the district of Kashin [Gov. of Tver], said to me in a rather solemn voice, "This night at three o'clock Nicholas Ivanovitch [Ponomareff] appeared to me and begged of me to reconcile him to you." (Signed) Baron Basil Driesen. Mr. Solovovo adds:— The Baroness von Driesen is now dead, so that her evidence cannot be obtained.... I also saw Baron Basil von Driesen himself, and spoke with him about M. Ponomareff's ghost. He stated to me that if he were going to die to-morrow, he should still be ready to swear to the fact of his having seen Baron Nicholas von Driesen—Baron Basil's son—called on me a few days ago. He stated, with regard to the case in question, that it was necessary to see the clergyman in order to induce him to write an account of what had happened to him. Baron N. von Driesen afterwards sent a note to Mr. Solovovo, stating that his grandfather (M. Ponomareff) died on November 21st, 1860; and the testimony of the priest was obtained later. Mr. Solovovo, who had already ascertained independently that the Rev. Basil Bajenoff had been a priest at Koi in the year 1861, and was there still, writes:— The following is the translation of the Rev. Basil Bajenoff's statement:— "KOI, July 23rd [August 4th], 1891. "To the account I heard from Baron B. F. Driesen in the presence of his wife's brothers, MM. N. N., A. N., and I. N. Ponomareff, as to how M. Nicholas I. Ponomareff appeared to him in the night of November 29-30th, 1860, having died nine days before, and begged of the Baron to be reconciled to him, I may add that to me also did he appear at the same time and with the same request, which fact, before hearing the Baron's narrative, I communicated to all those present at the liturgy for the rest of the soul of the late M. N. I. Ponomareff. "(Signed) Basil Bajenoff, VII. E. The following is quoted from the "Report on the Census of Hallucinations" in Proceedings S.P.R., vol. x. p. 284. From Countess EugÉnie Kapnist:— June 24th, 1891. A Talta, en FÉvrier, 1889, nous fÎmes la connaissance de M. P. et de sa femme, passant la soirÉe chez des amis communs qui avaient tenu À nous rÉunir. A cette Époque, M. P. souffrait dÉjÀ d'une phthisie assez avancÉe; il venait de perdre, À PÉtersbourg, son frÈre, atteint de la mÊme maladie. On pria ma soeur de faire un peu de musique, et elle choisit au hasard le PrÉlude de Mendelssohn. A mon Étonnement je vis M. P. que nous ne connaissions que de ce soir, aller, trÈs ÉmotionnÉ, prendre place auprÈs du piano, et suivre avec une espÈce d'anxiÉtÉ le jeu de ma soeur. Lorsqu'elle eut fini, il dit que pour quelques instants elle venait de faire ressusciter son frÈre, exÉcutant absolument de la mÊme maniÈre ce morceau, qu'il jouait frÉquemment. Depuis, en voyant ma soeur, NÉanmoins nous fÎmes À peine connaissance de maison; nous nous rencontrions parfois chez des amis communs, et nous le voyions souvent se promener sur le quai dans un paletot couleur noisette qui excitait notre hilaritÉ et qui nous resta dans la mÉmoire je ne sais plus pourquoi. Au mois de Mai, nous partions de Talta, et depuis nous eÛmes tant d'impressions diverses, nous vÎmes tant de monde, que jusqu'À l'hiver suivant nous oubliÂmes complÉtement M. P. et sa femme, qui reprÉsentaient pour nous des connaissances comme on en a par centaines dans la vie. Nous Étions À PÉtersbourg. Le 11 Mars, c'Était un lundi de CarÊme en 1890, nous allÂmes au thÉÂtre voir une reprÉsentation de la troupe des Meiningner. Je crois qu'on donnait Le Marchand de Venise. Mlle. B. Était avec nous, venue de TsarskoÉ À cette occasion. La piÈce terminÉe, nous n'eÛmes que le temps de rentrer À la maison changer de toilette, aprÈs quoi nous accompagnÂmes Mlle. B. À la gare. Elle partait avec le dernier train, qui quitte pour TsarskoÉ SÉlo À 1 heure de la nuit. Nous l'installÂmes en wagon, et ne l'y laissÂmes qu'aprÈs la seconde cloche de dÉpart. Notre domestique allait bien en avant de nous, afin de retrouver notre voiture, de maniÈre que, gagnant le perron, nous la trouvÂmes avancÉe qui nous attendait. Ma soeur s'assit la premiÈre; moi je la fis attendre, descendant plus doucement les marches de l'escalier; le domestique tenait la portiÈre du landau ouverte. Je montai À demi, sur le marchepied, et soudain je m'arrÊtai dans cette pose, tellement surprise que je ne compris plus ce qui m'arrivait. Il faisait sombre dans la voiture, et pourtant en face de ma soeur, la regardant, je vis dans un petit jour gris qu'on eÛt dit factice, s'Éclaircissant vers le point qui attachait le plus mes yeux, une figure À la silhouette ÉmoussÉe, diaphane, plutÔt qu'indÉcise. Cette vision dura un instant, pendant lequel, pourtant, mes yeux prirent connaissance des moindres dÉtails de ce visage, qui me sembla connu: des traits assez pointus, une raie un peu de cÔtÉ, un nez prononcÉ, un menton trÈs maigre À barbe rare et d'un blond foncÉ. Ce qui me frappe, lorsque j'y pense À prÉsent, c'est d'avoir vu les diffÉrentes couleurs, malgrÉ que la lueur grisÂtre, qui Éclairait À peine l'inconnu, eÛt ÉtÉ insuffisante pour les distinguer dans un cas normal. Il Était sans chapeau, et en mÊme Le domestique, trÈs ÉtonnÉ de ne pas me voir monter, arrÊtÉe ainsi sur le marchepied, crut que j'avais marchÉ dans ma robe et m'aida À m'asseoir, pendant que je demandais À ma soeur, en prenant place À cÔtÉ d'elle, si c'Était bien notre voiture? A tel point j'avais perdu la tÊte, ayant senti un vrai engourdissement de cerveau en voyant cet Étranger installÉ en face d'elle, je ne m'Étais pas rendu compte que, dans le cas d'une prÉsence rÉelle d'un semblable vis-À-vis, ni ma soeur, ni le valet de pied ne resteraient si calmement À l'envisager. Lorsque je fus assise, je ne vis plus rien, et je demandais À ma soeur:—"N'as-tu rien vu en face de toi?" "Rien du tout, et quelle idÉe as-tu eue de demander, en entrant dans la voiture, si c'Était bien la nÔtre?" rÉpondit-elle en riant. Alors, je lui racontais tout ce qui prÉcÉde, dÉcrivant minutieusement ma vision. "Quelle figure connue," disait-elle, "et À paletot noisette, cette raie de cÔtÉ, oÙ donc l'avons nous vue? Pourtant nul ne ressemble ici À ta description"; et nous nous creusions la tÊte sans rien trouver. RentrÉes À la maison, nous racontÂmes ce fait À notre mÈre; ma description la fit aussi souvenir vaguement d'un visage analogue. Le lendemain soir (12 Mars) un jeune homme de notre connaissance, M. M. S., vint nous voir. Je lui rÉpÉtais aussi l'incident qui nous Était arrivÉ. Nous en parlÂmes beaucoup, mais inutilement; je ne pouvais toujours pas appliquer le nom voulu À la personnalitÉ de ma vision, tout en me souvenant fort bien avoir vu un visage tout pareil parmi mes nombreuses connaissances; mais oÙ et À quelle Époque? Je ne me souvenais de rien, avec ma mauvaise mÉmoire qui me fait souvent dÉfaut, À ce sujet. Quelques jours plus tard, nous Étions chez la grandmÈre de M. M. S.:—"Savez-vous," nous dit-elle, "quelle triste nouvelle je viens de recevoir de Talta? M. P. vient de mourir, mais on ne me donne pas de dÉtails." Ma soeur et moi, nous nous regardÂmes. A ce nom, la figure pointue et le paletot noisette retrouvÈrent leur possesseur. Ma soeur reconnut en mÊme temps que moi, grÂce À ma description prÉcise. Lorsque M. M. S. entra, je le priai de chercher dans les vieux journaux la date exacte de cette mort. Le dÉcÈs Était marquÉ au 14 du mois de Mars, donc, deux jours aprÈs la vision que j'avais eue. J'Écrivis À Talta pour avoir des renseignements. On me rÉpondit qu'il gardait le lit depuis le 24 Novembre et qu'il avait ÉtÉ depuis dans un État de faiblesse extrÊme, mais le sommeil ne l'avait point quittÉ; il dormait si longtemps et si profondÉment, mÊme durant les derniÈres nuits de son existence, que cela faisait espÉrer une amÉlioration. Nous nous Étonnions de ce que j'aie vu M. P., malgrÉ sa promesse de se montrer À ma soeur. Mais je dois ajouter ici qu'avant le fait dÉcrit ci-dessus, j'avais ÉtÉ voyante un certain nombre de fois, mais cette vision est bien celle que j'ai distinguÉe le plus nettement, avec des dÉtails minutieux, et avec les teintes diverses du visage humain, et mÊme du vÊtement. Comtesse EugÉnie Kapnist. The second signature is that of the sister who was present at the time. Mr. Michael Petrovo-Solovovo, who sent us the case, writes:— I have much pleasure in certifying that the fact of Countess Kapnist's vision was mentioned, among others, to myself before the news of Mr. P.'s death came to Petersburg. I well remember seeing an announcement of his demise in the papers. VII. F. From Phantasms of the Living, vol. i. p. 522, footnote. The account was written down, a few months after the occurrence, from the dictation of the percipient—Sister Bertha, Superior of the House of Mercy at Bovey Tracy, Newton Abbot—who read it through on December 29th, 1885, pronounced it correct, and signed it. On the night of the 10th of November, 1861 (I do not know the exact hour), I was up in my bed watching, because there was a person not quite well in the next room. I heard a voice, which I recognised at once as familiar to me, and at first thought of my sister. It said, in the brightest and most cheerful tone, "I am here with you." I answered, looking and seeing nothing, "Who are you?" The voice said, "You mustn't know yet." I heard nothing more, and saw nothing, and am certain that the door was not opened or shut. I was not in the least frightened, and felt convinced that it was Lucy's [Miss Lucy Gambier Parry's] voice. I have never doubted it from that moment. I had not heard of her being worse; the last account had been good, and I was expecting to hear that she was at Torquay. In the course of the next day (the 11th), mother told me that she had died on the morning of the 10th, rather more than twelve hours before I heard her voice. The narrator informs us that she has never in her life experienced any other hallucination of the senses. Mrs. Gambier Parry, of Highnam Court, Gloucester, step-mother and cousin of the "Lucy" of the narrative, writes:— Sister Bertha (her name is Bertha Foertsch) had been living for many years as German governess to Lucy Anna Gambier Parry, and was her dearest friend. She came to us at once on hearing of Lucy's death, and told me of the mysterious occurrence of the night before. VII. G. The following case is in some respects one of the most remarkable and best authenticated instances of "haunting" on record, although, as will be seen, the evidence for the identity of the apparition is inconclusive. The case was fully described in a paper entitled "Record of a Haunted House," by Miss R. C. Morton, in Proceedings S.P.R., vol. viii. pp. 311-332. Besides the account of the principal percipient, Miss R. C. Morton, the paper contains independent first-hand statements from six other witnesses,—a friend, Miss Campbell, a sister and brother of Miss An account of the case first came into my hands in December, 1884, and this with Miss Morton's letters to her friend, Miss Campbell, are the earliest written records. On May 1st, 1886, I called upon Captain Morton at the "haunted house," and afterwards visited him at intervals, and took notes of what he told me. I also saw Miss Morton and Miss E. Morton, and the two former servants whose accounts are given in Miss Morton's paper. The phenomena as seen or heard by all the witnesses were very uniform in character, even in the numerous instances where there had been no previous communication between the percipients. Miss Morton is a lady of scientific training, and was at the time her account was written (in April, 1892) preparing to be a physician. The name "Morton" is substituted for the real family name. With that exception the names and initials are the true ones. After describing the house and garden, Miss Morton proceeds:— It was built about the year 1860; the first occupant was Mr. S., an Anglo-Indian, who lived in it for about sixteen years. During this time, in the month of August, year uncertain, he lost his wife, to whom he was passionately attached, and to drown his grief took to drinking. About two years later, Mr. S. married again. His second wife, a Miss I. H., was in hopes of curing him of his intemperate habits, but instead she also took to drinking, and their married life was embittered by constant quarrels, frequently resulting in violent scenes. The chief subjects of dispute were the management of the children (two girls, and either one or two boys, all quite young) of the first Mrs. S., and the possession of her jewellery, to preserve which for her children, Mr. S. had some of the boards in the small front sitting-room taken up by a local carpenter and the jewels inserted in the receptacle so formed. Finally, a few months before Mr. S.'s death, on July 14th, 1876, his wife separated from him and went to live in Clifton. She was not present at the time of his death, nor, as far as is known, was she ever at the house afterwards. She died on September 23rd, 1878. After Mr. S.'s death the house was bought by Mr. L., an elderly gentleman, who died rather suddenly within six months of going into it. The house then remained empty for some years—probably four. During this time there is no direct evidence of haunting, but when inquiry was made later on much hearsay evidence was brought forward. In April 1882, the house was let by the representatives of the late Mr. L. to Captain Morton, and it is during his tenancy (not yet terminated) that the appearances recorded have taken place. The family consists of Captain M. himself; his wife, who is a great invalid; neither of whom saw anything; a married daughter, Mrs. K., then about twenty-six, who was only a visitor from time to time, sometimes with, but more often without, her husband; four unmarried daughters, myself, then aged nineteen, who was the chief percipient and now give the chief account of the apparition; E. Morton, then aged eighteen; L. and M. Morton, then fifteen and thirteen; two sons, one of sixteen, who was absent during the greater part of the time when the apparition was seen; the other, then six years old. My father took the house in March 1882, none of us having then heard of anything unusual about the house. We moved in towards the end of April, and it was not until the following June that I first saw the apparition. I had gone up to my room, but was not yet in bed, when I heard some one at the door, and went to it, thinking it might be my mother. On opening the door, I saw no one; but on going a few steps along the passage, I saw the figure of a tall lady, dressed in black, standing at the head of the stairs. After a few moments she descended the stairs, and I followed for a short distance, feeling curious what it could be. I had only a small piece of candle, and it suddenly burnt itself out; and being unable to see more, I went back to my room. The figure was that of a tall lady, dressed in black of a soft woollen material, judging from the slight sound in moving. The face was hidden in a handkerchief held in the right hand. This is all I noticed then; but on further occasions, when I was able to observe her more closely, I saw the upper part of the left side of the forehead, and a little of the hair above. Her left hand was nearly hidden by her sleeve and a fold of her dress. As she held it down a portion of a widow's cuff was visible on both wrists, so that the whole impression was that of a lady in widow's weeds. There was no cap on the head but a general effect of blackness suggests a bonnet, with a long veil or a hood. During the next two years—from 1882 to 1884—I saw the figure about half-a-dozen times; at first at long intervals, and afterwards at shorter, but I only mentioned these appearances to one friend, who did not speak of them to any one. During this period, as far as we know, there were only three appearances to any one else. 1. In the summer of 1882 to my sister, Mrs. K., when the figure was thought to be that of a Sister of Mercy who had called at the house, and no further curiosity was aroused. She was coming down the stairs rather late for dinner at 6.30, it being then quite light, when she saw the figure cross the hall in front of her, and pass into the drawing-room. She then asked the rest of us, already seated at dinner, "Who was that Sister of Mercy whom I have just seen going into the drawing-room?" She was told there was no such person, and a servant was sent to look; but the drawing-room was empty, and she was sure no one had come in. Mrs. K. persisted that she had seen a tall figure in black, with some white about it; but nothing further was thought of the matter. 2. In the autumn of 1883 it was seen by the housemaid about 10 P.M., 3. On or about December 18th, 1883, it was seen in the drawing-room by my brother and another little boy. They were playing outside on the terrace when they saw the figure in the drawing-room close to the window, and ran in to see who it could be that was crying so bitterly. They found no one in the drawing-room, and the parlour-maid told them that no one had come into the house. After the first time, I followed the figure several times downstairs into the drawing-room, where she remained a variable time, generally standing to the right hand side of the bow window. From the drawing-room she went along the passage towards the garden door, where she always disappeared. The first time I spoke to her was on January 29th, 1884. "I opened the drawing-room door softly and went in, standing just by it. She came in past me and walked to the sofa and stood still there, so I went up to her and asked her if I could help her. She moved, and I thought she was going to speak, but she only gave a slight gasp and moved towards the door. Just by the door I spoke to her again, but she seemed as if she were quite unable to speak. She walked into the hall, then by the side door she seemed to disappear as before." (Quoted from a letter written on January 31st.) In May and June, 1884, I tried some experiments, fastening strings with marine glue across the stairs at different heights from the ground—of which I give a more detailed account later on. I also attempted to touch her, but she always eluded me. It was not that there was nothing there to touch, but that she always seemed to be beyond me, and if followed into a corner, simply disappeared. During these two years the only noises I heard were those of slight pushes against my bedroom door, accompanied by footsteps; and if I looked out on hearing these sounds, I invariably saw the figure. "Her footstep is very light, you can hardly hear it, except on the linoleum, and then only like a person walking softly with thin boots on." (Letter on January 31st, 1884.) The appearances during the next two months—July and August, 1884—became much more frequent; indeed they were then at their maximum, from which time they seem gradually to have decreased, until now they seem to have ceased. Of these two months I have a short record in a set of journal letters written at the time to a friend. On July 21st I find the following account. "I went into the drawing-room, where my father and sisters were sitting about nine in the evening, and sat down on a couch close to the bow window. A few minutes after, as I sat reading, I saw the figure come in at the open door, cross the room and take up a position close behind the couch where I was. I was astonished that no one else in the room saw her, as she was so very distinct to me. My youngest brother, who had before seen her, was not in the room. She stood behind the couch for about half-an-hour, and then as usual walked to the door. I went after her, on the excuse of getting a book, and saw her pass along the hall, On the night of August 1st, I again saw the figure. I heard the footsteps outside on the landing about 2 A.M. I got up at once, and went outside. She was then at the end of the landing at the top of the stairs, with her side view towards me. She stood there some minutes, then went downstairs, stopping again when she reached the hall below. I opened the drawing-room door and she went in, walked across the room to the couch in the bow window, stayed there a little, then came out of the room, went along the passage, and disappeared by the garden door. I spoke to her again, but she did not answer. On the night of August 2nd the footsteps were heard by my three sisters and by the cook, all of whom slept on the top landing—also by my married sister, Mrs. K., who was sleeping on the floor below. They all said the next morning that they had heard them very plainly pass and repass their doors. The cook was a middle-aged and very sensible person; on my asking her the following morning if any of the servants had been out of their rooms the night before, after coming up to bed, she told me that she had heard these footsteps before, and that she had seen the figure on the stairs one night when going down to the kitchen to fetch hot water after the servants had come up to bed. She described it as a lady in widow's dress, tall and slight, with her face hidden in a handkerchief held in her right hand. Unfortunately we have since lost sight of this servant; she left us about a year afterwards on her mother's death, and we cannot now trace her. She also saw the figure outside the kitchen windows on the terrace-walk, she herself being in the kitchen; it was then about eleven in the morning, but having no note of the occurrence, I cannot now remember whether this appearance was subsequent to the one above mentioned. These footsteps are very characteristic, and are not at all like those of any of the people in the house; they are soft and rather slow, though decided and even. My sisters would not go out on the landing after hearing them pass, nor would the servants, but each time when I have gone out after hearing them, I have seen the figure there. On August 5th I told my father about her and what we had seen and heard. He was much astonished, not having seen or heard anything himself at that time—neither then had my mother, but she is slightly deaf, and is an invalid. He made inquiries of the landlord (who then lived close by) as to whether he knew of anything unusual about the house, as he had himself lived in it for a short time, but he replied that he had only been there for three months, and had never seen anything unusual.... On the evening of August 11th we were sitting in the drawing-room with the gas lit but the shutters not shut, the light outside getting dusk, my brothers and a friend having just given up tennis, finding it too dark; my eldest sister, Mrs. K., and myself both saw the figure on the balcony outside, looking in at the window. She stood there some minutes, then walked to the end and back again, after which she seemed to disappear. She soon after came into the drawing-room, when I saw her, but my sister did not. The same evening my sister E. saw her on the stairs as she came out of a room on the upper landing. The following evening, August 12th, while coming up the garden, I walked towards the orchard, when I saw the figure cross the orchard, go along the carriage drive in front of the house, and in at the open side door, across the hall and into the drawing-room, I following. She crossed the drawing-room and took up her usual position behind the couch in the bow window. My father came in soon after, and I told him she was there. He could not see the figure, but went up to where I showed him she was. She then went swiftly round behind him, across the room, out of the door, and along the hall, disappearing as usual near the garden door, we both following her. We looked out into the garden, having first to unlock the garden door, which my father had locked as he came through, but saw nothing of her. On August 12th, about 8 P.M., and still quite light, my sister E. was singing in the back drawing-room. I heard her stop abruptly, come out into the hall, and call me. She said she had seen the figure in the drawing-room close behind her as she sat at the piano. I went back into the room with her and saw the figure in the bow window in her usual place. I spoke to her several times, but had no answer. She stood there for about ten minutes or a quarter of an hour; then went across the room to the door, and along the passage, disappearing in the same place by the garden door. My sister M. then came in from the garden, saying she had seen her coming up the kitchen steps outside. We all three then went out into the garden, when Mrs. K. called out from a window on the first storey that she had just seen her pass across the lawn in front and along the carriage drive towards the orchard. This evening, then, altogether four people saw her. My father was then away, and my youngest brother was out. On the morning of August 14th the parlour-maid saw her in the dining-room, about 8.30 A.M., having gone into the room to open the shutters. The room is very sunny, and even with all the shutters closed it is quite light, the shutters not fitting well, and letting sunlight through the cracks. She had opened one shutter, when, on turning round, she saw the figure cross the room. We were all on the look-out for her that evening, but saw nothing; in fact, whenever we had made arrangements to watch, and were especially expecting her, we never saw anything. This servant, who afterwards married, was interviewed by Mr Myers at her own house.... On August 19th we all went to the seaside, and were away a month, leaving three servants in the house. When we came back they said that they had heard footsteps and noises frequently, but as the stair-carpets were up part of the time and the house was empty, many of these noises were doubtless due to natural causes, though by them attributed to the figure. The cook also spoke of seeing the figure in the garden, standing by a stone vase on the lawn behind the house. During the rest of that year and the following, 1885, the apparition was frequently seen through each year, especially during July, August, and September. In these months the three deaths took place, viz.:—Mr. S., on July 14th, 1876; the first Mrs. S. in August, and the second Mrs. S. on September 23rd. The apparitions were of exactly the same type, seen in the same places and by the same people, at varying intervals. The footsteps continued, and were heard by several visitors and new servants who had taken the places of those who had left, as well as by myself, four sisters and brother; in all by about twenty people, many of them not having previously heard of the apparitions or sounds. Other sounds were also heard in addition which seemed gradually to increase in intensity. They consisted of walking up and down on the second-floor landing, of bumps against the doors of the bedrooms, and of the handles of the doors turning.... During this year, at Mr. Myers's suggestion, I kept a photographic camera constantly ready to try to photograph the figure, but on the few occasions I was able to do so, I got no result; at night, usually only by candle-light, a long exposure would be necessary for so dark a figure, and this I could not obtain. I also tried to communicate with the figure, constantly speaking to it and asking it to make signs, if not able to speak, but with no result. I also tried especially to touch her, but did not succeed. On cornering her, as I did once or twice, she disappeared. Some time in the summer of this year (1886), Mrs. Twining, our regular charwoman, saw the figure, while waiting in the hall at the door leading to the kitchen stairs, for her payment. Until it suddenly vanished from her sight, as no real figure could have done, she thought it was a lady visitor who had mistaken her way. Mr. Myers interviewed her on December 29th, 1889, and has her separate account. On one night in July 1886 (my father and I being away from home), my mother and her maid heard a loud noise in an unoccupied room over their heads. They went up, but seeing nothing and the noise ceasing, they went back to my mother's room on the first storey. They then heard loud noises from the morning-room on the ground floor. They then went half-way downstairs, when they saw a bright light in the hall beneath. Being alarmed, they went up to my sister E., who then came down, and they all three examined the doors, windows, etc., and found them all fastened as usual. My mother and her maid then went to bed. My sister E. went up to her room on the second storey, but as she passed the room where my two sisters L. and M. were sleeping, they opened their door to say that they had heard noises, and also seen what they described as the flame of a candle, without candle or hand visible, cross In the course of the following autumn we heard traditions of earlier haunting, though, unfortunately, in no case were we able to get a first-hand account.... We also now heard from a carpenter who had done jobs in the house in Mrs. S.'s time, that Mrs. S. had wished to possess herself of the first Mrs. S.'s jewels. Her husband had called him in to make a receptacle under the boards in the morning-room on the ground-floor, in which receptacle he placed the jewels, and then had it nailed down and the carpet replaced. The carpenter showed us the place. My father made him take up the boards; the receptacle was there, but empty.... During the next two years, 1887 to 1889, the figure was very seldom seen, though footsteps were heard; the louder noises had gradually ceased. From 1889 to the present, 1892, so far as I know, the figure has not been seen at all; the lighter footsteps lasted a little longer, but even they have now ceased. The figure became much less substantial on its later appearances. Up to about 1886 it was so solid and life-like that it was often mistaken for a real person. It gradually became less distinct. At all times it intercepted the light; we have not been able to ascertain if it cast a shadow. Proofs of Immateriality. 1. I have several times fastened fine strings across the stairs at various heights before going to bed, but after all others have gone up to their rooms. These were fastened in the following way: I made small pellets of marine glue, into which I inserted the ends of the cord, then stuck one pellet lightly against the wall and the other to the banister, the string being thus stretched across the stairs. They were knocked down by a very slight touch, and yet would not be felt by any one passing up or down the stairs, and by candle-light could not be seen from below. They were put at various heights from the ground from six inches to the height of the banisters, about three feet. I have twice at least seen the figure pass through the cords, leaving them intact. 2. The sudden and complete disappearance of the figure, while still in full view. 3. The impossibility of touching the figure. I have repeatedly followed it into a corner, when it disappeared, and have tried to suddenly pounce upon it, but have never succeeded in touching it or getting my hand up to it, the figure eluding my touch. 4. It has appeared in a room with the doors shut. On the other hand, the figure was not called up by a desire to see it, for on every occasion when we had made special arrangements to watch The figure has been connected with the second Mrs. S.; the grounds for which are:— 1. The complete history of the house is known, and if we are to connect the figure with any of the previous occupants, she is the only person who in any way resembled the figure. 2. The widow's garb excludes the first Mrs. S. 3. Although none of us had ever seen the second Mrs. S., several people who had known her identified her from our description. On being shown a photo-album containing a number of portraits, I picked out one of her sister as being most like that of the figure, and was afterwards told that the sisters were much alike. 4. Her step-daughter and others told us that she especially used the front drawing-room in which she continually appeared, and that her habitual seat was on a couch placed in similar position to ours. 5. The figure is undoubtedly connected with the house, none of the percipients having seen it anywhere else, nor had any other hallucination. In writing the above account, my memory of the occurrences has been largely assisted by reference to a set of journal letters written [to Miss Campbell] at the time, and by notes of interviews held by Mr. Myers with my father and various members of our family. R. C. Morton. Of the accounts given by the other witnesses, I quote only part of Miss Campbell's statement, as follows:— 77 Chesterton Road, North Kensington, W., March 31st, 1892. ...On the night on which Miss Morton first spoke to the figure, as stated in her account, I myself saw her telepathically. I was in my room (I was then residing in the North of England, quite one hundred miles away from Miss Morton's home), preparing for bed, between twelve and half-past, when I seemed suddenly to be standing close by the door of the housemaid's cupboard, so facing the short flight of stairs leading to the top landing. Coming down these stairs, I saw the figure, exactly as described, and about two steps behind Miss Morton herself, with a dressing-gown thrown loosely round her, and carrying a candle in her hand. A loud noise in the room overhead recalled me to my surroundings, and although I tried for some time I could not resume the impression. The black dress, dark head-gear, widow's cuffs and handkerchief were plainly visible, though the details of them were not given me by Miss Morton till afterwards, when I asked her whether she had not seen the apparition on that night. (Signed) Catherine M. Campbell. To this account Miss Morton adds:— Miss Campbell was the friend to whom I first spoke of the apparition. She suggested to me that when next I saw her I should speak; but of course she had no idea when this would be. She wrote an account to me the next day of what she had seen, and asked me if I had not seen the figure that night; but naturally did not know that I had done so, until she received my reply. Miss Campbell asks me to say that this is the only vision she has had, veridical or otherwise. |