LONGEVITY.

Previous

The greater the complexity of a piece of machinery, and the more labour it is called upon to perform, the more rapid will be its wear and tear. This applies to human life as well as to mechanism. The derangement of its component parts—its springs and wheels, will also be in the ratio of their complication. Thus do we find that the brute creation are less subject to those affections that abridge their days than mankind. Their life is natural, except when under the sway of domestication: ours is artificial; and high civilization tends to render it still more unnatural than it would most probably have been in a simple and patriarchal existence. Endowed with more acuteness of sensibility than animals, we are rendered more susceptible of the extremes of pleasure and of pain; and our voluptuous enjoyments are perhaps more prejudicial than our sufferings. Had not the Creator wisely granted us the faculty of reasoning, we should have been the most wretched of all organized beings.

The tenure of life depends upon the sum of vitality originally deposited, and the extent of our drafts upon this capital, which we too frequently exhaust by untimely expenses. Experience has proved that under ordinary circumstances, man can live six or seven times longer than the years required to attain puberty. This epoch is placed at our fourteenth year. This calculation would therefore yield from 84 to 98 years of age. Our own imprudences, and the disorders resulting from them, are more hostile in abridging this period than nature, all-wise and all-bountiful. Indeed, when we reflect on all the excesses to which we expose our frail and complicated being, as if we were resolved to try by every possible experiment how far it possesses the power of resisting destructive agents, we can only marvel in beholding so many instances of longevity. In this wasteful existence how many valuable hours do we not lose? how many real enjoyments have we not deprived ourselves of? When compared to the immensity of time, life is but an idle span. Let us deduct even from old age the years of infancy, the years of caducity, and the years of sleep,—alas! what remaineth of our many and our energetic days? Maupertuis calculated that in an ordinary life man could scarcely enjoy more than three years of happiness, mixed up with sixty or eighty years of misery or insipidity; and yet how miserable are we at the thought of quitting this short-leased tenement, though every wretchedness renders our abode a constant scene of uneasiness. It has been computed that out of about nine hundred millions of human beings that are scattered over the globe, it is more than probable that we could not find nine thousand individuals blessed with happiness, even taking happiness in its most limited sense—content. Were it not for the terrors of futurity, it is more than probable that our existence would lose much of its value. Socrates termed philosophy “the preparation for death;” the same may be said of our existence.

Happily for man, life is a dream, all is illusion; sufferings alone are positive; Pandora’s box is its best illustration. Could we have slept away our existence in constant visions, we should have lived as long as in a waking state. When we contemplate the flocks of human beings scattered like cattle on the face of the universe, with scarcely more intellect than the beasts of the same field, we might ask for what were they created? doomed to all the horrors of sickness or of war, victims of their own follies or the ambitious projects of others! As far as regards this life, it is worse than idle to seek a solution of the problem. In these inquiries we too often seek to guess that which we can never know, and to know that which we can never guess! We all complain and murmur like the woodman in the fable, yet are loath to accept the relief we loudly call for.

The longevity of the first races, and the patriarchs, are records foreign to the investigations of natural history; we must seek for more recent examples. Haller had collected the cases of many centenaries, amounting to sixty-two who had reached from 100 to 120; twenty-nine from 120 to 130; and fifteen from 130 to 140. Few instances are authenticated beyond this period: yet we find one Eccleston, who lived 143 years; John Effingham, who attained his 144th; a Norwegian, who counted a century and a half; and our Thomas Parr would most probably have passed his 152nd year but for an excess. Henry Jenkins lived to 169; and we have on record the case of a Negress, aged 175. The Hungarian family of John Rovin were remarkable for their longevity: the father lived to 172, the wife to 164; they had been married 142 years, and their youngest child was 115; and such was the influence of habit and filial affection, that this child was treated with all the severity of paternal rigidity, and did not dare to act without his papa’s and mamma’s permission.

By the calculations of Sussmilch, out of one thousand individuals, only one attained 97; and not more than one lived to the age of 100, out of one hundred and fourteen thousand. In the census of Italy, taken under Vespasian, there were found fifty-four of 100, fifty-seven of 110, two of 125, four of 130, and three of 140. In China, under Kien Long, in 1784, there were only four individuals who had attained their 100th year. According to Larrey, there were at Cairo thirty-five persons who had exceeded their century. In Russia, in 1814, out of eight hundred and ninety-one thousand six hundred and fifty deaths, were three thousand five hundred and thirty-one from 100 to 132. In a register of deaths in Paris, taken in 1817, there were found in twenty-one thousand three hundred and ninety-two, nine from 95 to 100, and the general proportion of centenaries in that city is one to three thousand.

What are the circumstances most favourable to longevity? This question is not easily answered; for we find in instances of advanced age that some individuals have led a most regular and abstemious life, while others have indulged in various excesses. These observations, however, are by no means calculated to form a conclusive opinion, as the constitutional vigour and peculiar idiosyncrasies of individuals differ widely. It is probable that a regular mode of living is the most likely to prolong our years, whatever may be that regularity in a comparative point of view. A sober man, who commits occasional excesses, is more likely to suffer than another man who gets drunk every night, provided that these excesses do not differ in regard to the quantity or quality of stimulus. In these melancholy instances the excitement is constant, and the indirect debility which it may produce has scarcely time to break down the system ere it is again wound up to its usual pitch, to use the vulgar expression, “by a hair of the same hound.” The principal attribute of life that renovates for a while its moral and its physical exhaustion is excitability, and a constant excitement is therefore indispensable, to serve as fuel to the consuming fire. This was to a certain degree the basis on which Brown founded his doctrine. He traced a scale of life like that of a thermometer,—health in the centre, death at each extremity: one scale ascending from health was graduated according to stimulating agency, the other to debilitating causes; and therefore the system was to be stimulated or lowered according to this gradation. It would be foreign to this work to point out the absurdity of this theory, although we must admit its ingenuity, and to a certain extent its correctness. The chief practical objection to it was the diversity of constitutions and idiosyncrasies, and the different action of stimulating or depressing agents in health and in disease; the effects of alimentary and medicinal substances being totally different in these several conditions.

According to habit, a certain sum of stimulus is requisite to keep up the necessary excitement; and this sum cannot be immediately and suddenly withdrawn in weak subjects without some risk; in health, perhaps, the experiment may be safely made at all times, and under any circumstances, although it might be wiser to operate the change by degrees; and it must moreover be recollected, that an habitual drunkard is in a morbid condition, and must be treated accordingly.

Six causes chiefly exert their influence upon life:

1. Climate and soil.

2. Difference of races.

3. Complexion and stature.

4. Period of development during gestation, and of subsequent growth.

5. Mode of living.

6. Moral emotions, occupations.

Climates that are moderately cold are more favourable to long life. This observation equally applies to the vegetable kingdom; and trees that have scarcely attained their full growth in northern regions are drooping in the south. There also we find beasts and birds resisting the inclemency of the weather by the thickness of their coats and plumage, or a layer of grease; while many animals burrow in the earth to seek a state of torpor and insensibility, until restored to active life by a more genial temperature. Dryness of soil is another source of health and life; and the hardy mountaineer’s existence is seldom abridged by the diseases that visit the inhabitants of damp and swampy regions. Steril plains are more salubrious than regions covered with a rank and exuberant vegetation, or highly cultivated grounds, from many obvious reasons. The humid earth is not turned up, and decayed vegetable substances are not acted upon in a deleterious manner by the solar heat. When we consider the various causes of disease that must abound in crowded and corrupt cities, we might imagine that mortality would be much greater than in the country; yet observation has not proved this difference to be as material as one might expect, at least as regards disease, the sad effects of poverty and starvation not being taken into account. Various reasons may be assigned for this apparent anomaly. In cities a more regular state of excitement prevails, and man’s constant occupations scarcely give him time to attend to slight ailments, that, under other circumstances, might be aggravated. Moreover, intermittent fevers and visceral affections are more frequent in the country; and cottagers are exposed to more constant damp and severer revolutions in the atmospheric constitution than citizens. The mortality amongst men is greater in cities than in women; the latter do not enjoy so long a life in the country. March and April have been found the most fatal months. They are periods of atmospheric transition from cold to a higher temperature, and must therefore prove trying to the weak and the aged. The end of autumn is also deemed a sickly period; and the equinoxes have ever been considered critical, the solstices much less injurious. In Great Britain and the north-westerly regions of Europe, northerly and easterly winds are more prevalent in March, April, and May, owing, it is supposed, to the currents established to replace the warmer air, as it rises from the surface of the Atlantic and more southerly countries. These winds are generally dry and cold, followed by fogs, and give rise to catarrhs, bronchial and pulmonary affections. It is calculated that in our climes pulmonary affections carry off one-fifth of the population, or 191 in 1000.

In regard to the variety of races, it has been observed that those people who sooner attain pubescence are the shortest-lived. Precocious excitement must bring on premature old age. Negroes seldom attain an advanced period of life; and the progress of years is more rapidly descried in their features and their form than in Europeans who have migrated to their clime. The negroes of Congo, Mozambique, and Zanguebar, seldom reach their fiftieth year. In northern latitudes longevity is more frequent: this is observed in Sweden, Russia, Poland, Norway. Some writers have looked upon the established religion of a country as influencing the duration of life; and Toaldo asserted that Christians are shorter-lived than Jews. To this observation it may be remarked, that Jews are in general a very sober, industrious, and active race, circumstances that must materially tend to prolong their days. Moreover, by their legislation they are very careful in the choice of the meat they consume. In Catholic countries fasting may be taken into calculation, not from the effects of abstemiousness, which would be more favourable to health than injurious, but the sudden return to feasting and gormandizing, by way of revenge, when the fast is over. Shrove Tuesday and Easter Sunday are noted in red letters in the gastronomic almanac; and the suppers that follow the midnight masses of Christmas generally require the apothecary’s aid on the following morning.[46]

In regard to conformation, very tall and spare subjects are seldom long-lived; and the same observation applies to the stunted and diminutive. A well-set body, with a broad and deep chest, a neck not over-long, with well-formed and firm muscles, generally hold forth a fair prospect of old age.

Children born before the regular period of gestation, those who have been weaned too early, or given to nurses whose milk was not of a proper quality, are seldom strong. Too rapid a growth will also shorten the space of existence.

Our avocations and pursuits materially affect health and the consequent duration of life; and the nature of the excitement man is submitted to produces a remarkable effect. It has been calculated in France that one hundred and fifty-two academicians, whose aggregate years were ten thousand five hundred and eleven, averaged sixty-nine years and two months. The following calculation of Madden will further illustrate this curious subject.

AGES OF GREAT MEN.
Natural Philosophers.
Bacon 78 Euler 76
Buffon 81 Franklin 85
Copernicus 70 Galileo 78
Cuvier 64 Halley 86
Davy 51 Herschel 84
Kepler 60 Lalande 75
Laplace 77 Lewenhoeck 91
Leibnitz 70 LinnÆus 72
Newton 84 Tycho Brahe 75
Whiston 95 Wollaston 62
Poets.
Ariosto 59 Burns 38
Byron 37 Camoens 55
Collins 56 Cowley 49
Cowper 69 Dante 56
Dryden 70 Goldsmith 44
Gray 57 Metastasio 84
Milton 66 Petrarch 68
Pope 56 Shenstone 50
Spenser 46 Tasso 52
Thomson 48 Young 84
Moral Philosophers.
Bacon 65 Bayle 59
Berkeley 79 Condorcet 51
Condillac 65 Descartes 54
Diderot 71 Ferguson 92
Fitche 52 Hartley 52
Helvetius 57 Hobbes 91
Hume 65 Kant 80
Kaimes 86 Locke 72
Malebranche 77 Reid 86
Stewart 75 St. Lambert 88
Dramatists.
Alfieri 55 Corneille 78
Goethe 82 Massinger 55
Marlow 32 Otway 34
Racine 60 Schiller 46
Shakspeare 52 Voltaire 84
Congreve 59 Colman 61
Crebillon 89 Cumberland 80
Farquhar 30 Goldoni 85
B. Jonson 63 De Vega 73
MoliÈre 53 Murphy 78
Authors on Law and Jurisprudence.
Bentham 85 Blackstone 57
Butler 83 Coke 85
Erskine 73 Filangieri 36
Gifford 48 Grotius 63
Hale 68 Holt 68
Littleton 75 Mansfield 88
Montesquieu 66 Redesdale 82
Romilly 61 Rolle 68
Tenterden 78 Thurlow 74
Vatel 53 Wilmot 83
Miscellaneous and Novel Writers.
Cervantes 70 Le Sage 80
Scott 62 Fielding 47
Smollett 51 Rabelais 70
Defoe 70 Ratcliffe 60
Richardson 72 Sterne 56
Johnson 75 Addison 48
Warton 78 Steele 59
Tickell 54 Montaigne 60
Bathurst 84 Thornton 44
Hawkesworth 59 Hazlitt 58
Authors on Revealed Religion.
Baxter 76 Bellarmine 84
J. Butler 60 Bossuet 77
Calvin 56 Chillingworth 43
Doddridge 54 G. Fox 67
J. Knox 67 Lowth 77
Luther 63 Massillon 79
Melancthon 64 Paley 63
Porteus 77 Priestley 71
Sherlock 67 Wesley 88
Whitefield 56 Wycliffe 61
Authors on Natural Religion.
Annet 55 Bolingbroke 79
Cardan 75 Chubb 65
Sir W. Drummond 68 Dupuis 67
N. Freret 61 Gibbon 58
Lord Herbert 68 Spinosa 45
St. Pierre 77 Shaftesbury 42
Tindal 75 Toland 53
Vannini 34 Volney 66
Medical Authors.
J. Brown 54 Corvisart 66
Cullen 78 Darwin 72
Fordyce 67 Fothergill 69
Gall 71 J. Gregory 48
Harvey 81 Heberden 92
J. Hoffman 83 Hunter 65
W. Hunter 66 Jenner 75
M. Good 64 Paracelsus 43
Pinel 84 Sydenham 66
Tissot 70 T. Willis 54
Philologists.
Bentley 81 Parr 80
Casaubon 55 Pighius 84
Hartzheim 70 Raphelengius 59
Heyne 84 J. J. Scaliger 69
H. Stephens 71 Pauw 61
Vossius 73 Porson 50
Burton 64 Salmatius 66
Cheke 44 Sigonius 60
J. Harman 77 Sylburgius 51
Lipsius 60 Wolfius 64
Artists.
Bandinelle 72 Bernini 82
Canova 65 Donatello 83
Flaxman 71 Ghiberti 64
Giotto 60 M. Angelo 96
San Sovino 91 Verocchico 56
A. Caracci 49 Claude 82
David 76 Guido 67
Raphael 37 Reynolds 69
Salvator Rosa 58 Titian 96
P. Veronese 56 West 82
Musical Composers.
Arne 68 Bach 66
Beethoven 57 Burney 88
Bull 41 Cimarosa 41
Corelli 60 Gluck 75
Greby 72 Handel 75
Haydn 77 Kalkbrenner 51
Kerser 62 Martini 78
Mosart 36 Paesiello 75
Piccini 71 Porpore 78
Scarlatti 78 Weber 40

To this list we may add the following instances of longevity from the late publication of Mr. Farren:

Adling 93 Hempel 86
Alcock 91 Hesse 91
Bernabel 89 Leveridge 90
Celdara 90 Lopez 103
Canpra 84 Pittoni 90
Casipini 90 Reike 100
Cervetti 101 Sala 99
Child 90 Schell 87
Creighton 97 Schramm 82
Eichole 80 Telleman 86
Genimani 96 F. Turner 99
Gibbons 93 W. Turner 88
Hasse 90 Wagennell 98

In regard to the mortality of musicians, we give with much pleasure the following extract from the same work:

“The ages of 468 persons at death, were all that could be obtained from a biography of musicians; of these, 109 born since the year 1740 are excluded, because some of their cotemporaries were yet living at the date of such biography, also 41 more are excluded as having died under 50 years of age. There remain then, the ages at death of 318 persons on which the present observation is made.

“From the ages of 50 years to the end of life, the apparent rate of mortality among musicians, appears very nearly with the lowest known rate, or that which prevails in villages, and it is scarcely probable that such rate should so agree without being the true one. For a musician to belong to the last class of human life, is very credible, when it is considered that eminence can only be attained by close mental devotion to an exalted science, and unremitting application to its practical acquirement, which abstraction would interrupt and intemperance destroy.

“The mean age of musicians, born since 1690, is 67¾ years, or two years greater than those born before 1690, from which it might be conveniently concluded, that the moderns were longer lived than the ancients. The case is precisely the reverse, at least for ages above 50, to which alone the materials are applicable. The expectation of life at the age of 60 of the ancients were nearly 15 years, of the modern musicians 13½. The materials (limited as they are) from which these conclusions are drawn, support the doctrine, that the mortality of the moderns is less at middle, but greater at advanced age, than the mortality of the ancients.”

Dr. Caspar, of Berlin, in his late very interesting work on the duration of human life, has given the following conclusions:

Medium longevity.
Clergymen 65
Merchants 62
Clerks 61
Farmers 61
Military men 59
Lawyers 58
Artists 57
Medical men 56

The results of the other classes, with respect to their united ages, and the average of each, are—

Average.
Moral philosophers united ages 1417 70
Sculptors and painters 1412 70
Authors on law and jurisprudence 1394 69
Medical authors united ages 1368 68
Authors on revealed religion 1350 67
Philologists 1323 66
Musical composers 1284 64
Novelists and miscellaneous authors 1257 62½
Dramatists 1249 62
Authors on natural religion 1245 62
Poets 1144 57

This calculation was made most probably in Prussia.

Dr. Caspar’s view of longevity are not only highly interesting but, if correct, may lead to many important conclusions. He maintains that—

1. The female sex enjoys, at every period or epoch of life, except at puberty, at which epoch the mortality is greater among young females—a greater longevity than the male sex.

2. Pregnancy and labour occasion, indeed, a considerable loss of life, but this loss disappears or is lost in the general mass.

3. The so-called climacteric periods of life do not seem to have any influence on the longevity of either sex.

4. The medium duration of life at this present time (1835), is in Russia, about 21 years; in Prussia, 29; in Switzerland, 34; in France, 35; in Belgium, 36; and in England, 38 years.

5. The medium duration of life has, in recent times, increased very greatly in most cities of Europe.

6. In reference to the influence of professional occupations in life, it seems that clergymen are on the whole, the longest, and medical men are the shortest livers. Military men are nearly between the two extremes, but yet, proportionably they more frequently than others reach very advanced years.

7. The mortality is very generally greater in manufacturing than in agricultural districts.

8. Marriage is decidedly favourable to longevity.

9. The mortality among the poor is always greater than among the wealthier classes.

10. The mortality in a population appears to be always proportionate to its fecundity—as the number of births increases, so does the number of deaths at the same time.


If this last assertion be correct, Malthus’s doctrine must have been idle.

It appears that in general more males are born than females—this difference has been attributed to the age of the parents; when the mother is older than the father the female offspring are more numerous—the same is observed when both parents have attained an advanced age—but when the father’s age exceeds that of the mother’s, sons are chiefly the result of their union, it has been also observed that widowers are most frequently blessed with daughters.

Quetelet has very justly observed that the laws which preside over the development of man, and modify all his actions, are in general the result of his organization, of his years, his state of independence, the surrounding institutions, local influence, and an infinity of other causes, difficult to ascertain, and many of which, most probably, never can be known. Still if we admit the fact, our wellbeing, in a great measure, rests in our own hands, as the progress of our intellectual attainments may gradually enable us to improve our condition, in most of the points to which we have alluded; and Buffon has observed “that we know not to what extent man may perfect his nature, both in a moral and a physical point of view.”

Still the laws of our organization, and which regulate life, appear to be beyond human speculation; and it has been observed that, under ordinary circumstances, we are ruled by a harmonizing system tending to equalize society despite its institutions. Thus, births, marriages, and deaths, appear regulated on a certain scale in proportions singularly similar. This circumstance is rendered obvious by the following tables of nativity at Amsterdam.

Years. Still-born. Born alive.
Boys. Girls. Total. Boys. Girls. Total.
1821 288 246 534 3742 3600 7342
1822 280 222 502 3887 3713 7600
1823 268 198 466 3734 3448 7182
1824 266 216 482 4011 3849 7860
1825 207 173 404 3802 3559 7352
1826 231 173 404 3803 3635 7438
1827 3524 3366 6890
1828 3699 3529 7208
1829 3785 3618 7403
1830 241 169 410 3727 3579 7306
1831 208 168 376 3843 3499 7342
1832 210 151 361 3351 3101 6452

A statistical result much similar, was made also in Paris in the Bureau des Longitudes, as appears by the following return:

Years. Still-born. Born alive.
Boys. Girls. Total. Boys. Girls. Total.
1823 847 662 1509 13752 13318 27070
1824 810 677 1487 14647 14647 28812
1825 846 675 1521 14989 14264 29253
1826 810 737 1547 15187 14783 29970
1827 904 727 1631 15074 14732 29860
1828 883 743 1626 15117 14484 29601
1829 925 788 1713 14760 13961 28721
1830 943 784 1727 14488 14099 28587
1831 954 755 1709 15116 14414 29530
1832 994 726 1720 13494 12789 26283

In these statements, of which many to the same effect might be produced, it is singular that the number of still-born infants bears such a regular proportion with the nativity of living ones.

The proportion of deaths to births is also strangely regular, despite the difference of climate, and institutions, and the state of medical science in various countries, as will appear manifest by the following scales:

Cities. Proportion of
inhabitants
to one death.
Proportion of
inhabitants
to one birth.
London 46 0 } 46 4 40 8 } 35 2
Glasgow 46 8 29 5
Madrid 36 0 ? 32 3 26 0 ? 27 0
Leghorn 35 0 ? 25 5 ?
Lyons 32 2 ? 28 5 ?
Moscow 33 0 ? 27 5 ?
Palermo 32 0 ? 24 5 ?
Paris 31 4 ? 27 0 ?
Lisbon 31 1 ? 28 3 ?
Copenhagen 30 3 ? 30 0 ?
Hamburg 30 0 ? 25 5 ?
Barcelona 29 5 ? 26 6 27 0 ? 24 2
Berlin 29 0 ? 21 0 ?
Bordeaux 29 0 ? 24 0 ?
Naples 28 6 ? 23 8 ?
Dresden 27 7 ? 23 0 ?
Amsterdam 27 5 ? 26 0 ?
Brussels 25 8 ? 21 0 ?
Stockholm 24 6 ? 27 0 ?
Prague 24 5 ? 23 3 ?
Rome 24 4 ? 30 6 ?
20 0 ?
26 5 ?
20 0 ?
Vienna 22 5 20 0
Venice 19 4 } 18 7 26 5 } 23 2
Bergamo 18 0 20 0

While such a regular proportion prevails in births and deaths, a still more singular law seems to regulate the commission of crimes, of which the following registers of the cases brought to trial in France is a proof.

1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831
Murder in general 241 234 227 231 205 266
With fire arms 56 64 60 61 57 88
Swords, daggers, &c. 15 7 8 7 12 30
Knives 39 40 34 46 44 34
Sticks, bludgeons, &c. 23 28 31 24 12 21
Stones, &c. 20 20 21 21 11 9
Cutting and contusing instruments, tools, &c. 35 40 42 45 46 49
Strangulation 2 5 2 2 2 4
Drowning 6 16 6 1 4 3
Kicks, and blows with the fist 28 12 21 23 17 26
Fire ... 1 ... 1 ... ...
Unknown means 17 1 2 ... 2 2

The criminal statistics of France have produced the following calculation: From 7000 to 7300 criminals are tried every year, out of which number 61 out of 100 are found guilty; 170,000 offenders are charged with minor offences and misdemeanors, of whom 85 in the 100 are condemned to various punishments, and the greatest annual calculation which Quetelet remarks in an annual budget, paid much more regularly than taxes, is as follows:

Condemned to capital punishment 100 to 150
To hard labour for life 280
Hard labour for a period 1050
Imprisonment 1220

The following curious table has been drawn of the causes that excited to the commission of murder and the means resorted to:

Apparent motives, from
1826 to 1829.
Poison. Murder. Assassination. Incendiary. Total.
Cupidity 20 39 237 66 362
Adultery 48 9 76 ... 133
Domestic broils 48 120 131 84 333
Jealousy and debauchery 10 58 115 37 220
Revenge, hatred, and other motives 23 903 460 229 1615
Total 149 1129 1019 366 2663[47]

To what are we to attribute this apparent regularity in the scale of births, deaths, and the commission of crimes? Are we ruled by certain laws that are only changed in the manifestations of Providence, by peculiar visitations, such as war, famine, and pestilential maladies? What a vast and curious field of research and reflection! what an argument for the fatalist! Man no doubt possesses a moral power that to a certain extent subjugates the creation to his influence and his will. Plants and animals seem to obey certain natural laws, that are only disturbed by perturbative agents; and it is difficult to point out what are the human actions that arise from natural impulses, or from accidental circumstances, although experience would tend to show that they bear a singular proportion in the similarity of their results; and one must come although reluctantly to the conclusion, that this perturbative power exercises but a slender influence on the laws of nature, which seem to set at defiance the destructive efforts of man. Thus have we seen of late years, that the most fearful and long-protracted wars, which one might have imagined would have devastated the fairest parts of Europe, have not checked a surprising increase in its population, and the destructive effects of the most fatal pestilence have vanished with a promptness that seemed to keep pace with the preceding havoc. Bigotry and fanaticism are the only scourges which appear to dare the benevolent views of Providence, and when we traverse the desolate fields of most Roman Catholic countries, one would imagine that Heaven has abandoned their inhabitants to their own blind wills and evil ways. Spain at this period and at many epochs of her bloody history, seems to corroborate the fable of the Titans who sought refuge in that ill-fated land from the anger of the gods.[48]

To return: we find in the preceding resumÉs of longevity that poets are the shortest-lived; next to them, authors on natural religion, dramatists, and novelists. May not this circumstance be attributed to the fervour of their imagination and to their unequal mode of living? A species of madness is the attribute of genius. Many authors on natural religion may come under the denomination of monomaniacs. The jealous irritability of poets and dramatists,—and next to them in the scale of vanity we find musicians,—may also contribute to wear them out, and bring on various chronic diseases, by digestive derangements; more especially as their habits of living are seldom regular, fits of sobriety alternating with bouts of merry-making. Moral philosophers, painters, and sculptors, whose average life appears the longest, follow more sedentary pursuits; and, although artists in general cannot boast of remarkable discretion in their mode of living, the nature of their profession requires much steadiness. It is moreover to be observed that, in the preceding calculation, historical painters have chiefly been noticed. Would the same calculation apply to the lighter branches of the art? It has been remarked that actors generally attain old age, notwithstanding the fatiguing and harassing nature of their profession. This may be attributed to the constant excitement of a similar nature to which they are subject, as well as to their continued exposure to the sudden transitions from heat to cold, which renders them less susceptible of the variations of temperature that affect those who can avoid these vicissitudes. Any person who would expose himself to the constant checked perspirations to which dancers are liable, would infallibly pay dear for the experiment; and those who have had occasion to witness the fatigues of their exercises, marvel at their not being constantly attacked with pulmonary inflammation, and the many maladies that result from similar exposures. On the very same principle, troops when engaged upon active service do not suffer from the inclemency of the weather, although saturated with wet by day, and sleeping under torrents of rain by night. So long as they are marching with an object in view, this excitement supports them, even against hunger; but the moment this excitement ceases, let them halt, in tranquil cantonments, or commence a retreat under unfavourable circumstances, that moment the invasion of disease is observed. The chief source of health and long life is an equilibrious state of the circulation. This condition a moderate mental excitement tends to maintain. Depression, on the contrary, will produce a languid flow of the vital stream, congestion, and chronic diseases.

On the same principle, good temper and hilarity are also necessary to prolong life. Violent passions must tend to occasion dangerous determinations, while the inward gnawings of offended vanity and pride corrode every viscus, and lay the seeds of future mental and bodily sufferings. Apathy and insensibility are, unfortunately, the best sources of peace of mind, and as Fontenelle observed, a good stomach and a bad heart are essential to happiness. Perhaps the best maxim to prolong our days, and render them as tolerable as possible, is the “Bene vivere et lÆtari.”

I have just observed that conformation materially affects our existence; and this circumstance may in a great measure be referred to temper, and the wear and tear that it occasions in ill-conditioned individuals. Little people seldom attain the longevity of stronger individuals; and it is also a well-known fact that diminutive persons are generally spiteful and malicious. As Providence has bestowed destructive venoms on reptiles, so has it gifted these insignificant members of society with obnoxious qualities, to make amends for their want of physical power in the strategies of attack and defence. The same observation holds good with the deformed; but here we have a moral cause for this sourness of disposition. They too frequently are objects of ridicule, contempt, or pity, sentiments the most humiliating to mankind. In childhood they are not able to partake of the boisterous and active sports of their companions; they have not the power to resent an injury, and the more powerless we are, the greater is our thirst of revenge. Hence does tyranny degrade, and renders its victims cruel and vindictive. The deformed, moreover, find it necessary to improve their intellectual faculties, which in aftertimes fill their quivers with keen shafts of retaliation. In this study they also have more leisure, and they apply to their books while their comrades are at play. This very study adds to their sense of inferiority; they can never hope to share the warrior’s laurels, or, what is perhaps still more painful, the myrtle of successful love. Their only chance of success in either of these careers is by kindling wars by their intrigues, or winning a woman’s heart by intellectual superiority,—two very improbable events. Thus they gradually envy men who are looked upon by the world as their superiors, and hate women for the preference they show to those privileged individuals. In general we find these ill-shaped beings bitterly sarcastic whenever woman’s name is mentioned. Pope, perhaps from these very reasons, was inexhaustible in his abuse of the sex: and Boileau abhorred them, since he had been emasculated by a turkey-cock.

The intellectual superiority of hunchbacks has also been attributed to their physical condition; and it is generally believed that with them the circulation of blood in the brain is more rapid than in well-conformed subjects, and this increased action is supposed to contribute materially to the vivacity of the imagination, and the quickness of apprehension. Another circumstance is said to increase their mental powers, and that is, their continence, considered both by the ancients and the moderns as a source of intellectual energies. Minerva and the Muses were virgins; and in this and other fabulous traditions, we find the ancients illustrating in their mythologic allegories many physical facts and observations. Our Bacon had made the same remark; and Newton, and many other great men, considered the passion of love beneath the dignity of science. Continence and abstinence were deemed by Horace as indispensable privations in the cultivation of genius. In the deformed both are to a certain degree natural, or at least cannot be lost sight of without endangering life. The digestive powers of the deformed are generally weak; and this debility has ever been looked upon as a concomitant of superior intellects. Thus in Celsus, “Imbecilli stomacho penÈ omnes cupidi litterarum sunt;” while on the contrary, “Obesus venter non parit subtilem intellectum.”

The common expression of a child being too clever to live, is unfortunately founded on observation. Scrofulous and sickly children are in general remarkable for the quickness of their intellects; and Rousseau maintained that a man who could meditate was a depraved animal. It is a fact that the perfection of one faculty can seldom be attained but at the expense of others. The more our faculties are generally called into action, the less perfect will they be individually;—“Pluribus intentus, minor est ad singula.” Thus, the singing of birds is improved by depriving them of sight.

The influence of the mind upon our health is as evident as the influence of our health in the duration of existence. This corollary explains the shortness of life of the diminutive and the deformed, unconnected with such physical defects of organization as might impede the due exercise of their organs.

The fable of Prometheus is a strong illustration of the pernicious effects of intemperance; and by Darwin, and other physiologists, has been considered as comparing the celestial fire that he purloined, to the artificial inspirations of excitement that ultimately preys upon the liver and the other viscera like a voracious vulture. A much deeper philosophy is concealed in this theogenic allegory. Prometheus was the son of Japetus; brother to Atlas, Menoetius, and Epimetheus, who all surpassed mankind in fraud and in guilt. Prometheus himself scoffed the gods, and violated their shrine. Heaven and Earth had formed his father, who had united his destinies with Clymene, one of the Oceanides. Thus Prometheus and Epimetheus arose from the very cradle of the universe; and their very names, ???a?d??e?? and ?p?a?d??e??, signify foresight and improvidence,—prÆdiscere et postea discere,—the prevalent characteristics of all mortals, that either tend to promote or retard the progress of human reason and human happiness. Prometheus strove impiously to possess himself of Divine knowledge, and created man with a base amalgam of earth and the bones of animals, vivified by the celestial fire he had obtained. Jupiter, indignant at his audacity, commanded Vulcan to create a beauteous tempter in the form of woman, on whom every attractive gift might be conferred; and Pandora was sent upon earth with the fatal present of the father of the gods, the box that contained all the evils and distempers that were destined for mankind. The foresight of Prometheus resisted her charms; his improvident brother opened the dreaded casket. Have we not here an illustration of the vanity of science, that aims even at Divine attributes, and whose votaries, like Prometheus, would endeavour, if possible, to deprive wisdom of her power, and break down the boundaries of human intellects? His punishment describes in energetic language the endless and consuming studies of the learned, whose very viscera are corroded in lucubrations too often fruitless, and not unfrequently injurious to themselves and others. Hercules alone could relieve him from his torments:—and does not Hercules in this allegory typify the power of reason, that enables us to release the mind from the trammels both of ignorance and vanity, separated from each other by a gossamer partition? Prometheus, who could resist the most powerful of temptations,—beauty and talent combined,—dared Olympus to seek for that wisdom which would have doomed him to everlasting sufferings, had not strength of mind and the powers of reflection destroyed his merciless tormentor. Can we be surprised that the ancients consecrated games to this beautiful allegory?—games that are still carried on in our days; but, alas! where every vain competitor pretends that he has reached the goal with an unextinguished torch!


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

Clyx.com


Top of Page
Top of Page