CHAPTER XXII IRON, COBALT, AND NICKEL

Previous

Judging from the atomic weights, and the forms of the higher oxides of the elements already considered, it is easy to form an idea of the seven groups of the periodic system. Such are, for instance, the typical series Li, Be, B, C, N, O, F, or the third series, Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, S, Cl. The seven usual types of oxides from R2O to R2O7 correspond with them (Chapter XV.) The position of the eighth group is quite separate, and is determined by the fact that, as we have already seen, in each group of metals having a greater atomic weight than potassium a distinction ought to be made between the elements of the even and uneven series. The series of even elements, commencing with a strikingly alkaline element (potassium, rubidium, cÆsium), together with the uneven series following it, and concluding with a haloid (chlorine, bromine, iodine), forms a large period, the properties of whose members repeat themselves in other similar periods. The elements of the eighth group are situated between the elements of the even series and the elements of the uneven series following them. And for this reason elements of the eighth group are found in the middle of each large period. The properties of the elements belonging to it, in many respects independent and striking, are shown with typical clearness in the case of iron, the well-known representative of this group.

Iron is one of those elements which are not only widely diffused in the crust of the earth, but also throughout the entire universe. Its oxides and their various compounds are found in the most diverse portions of the earth's crust; but here iron is always found combined with some other element. Iron is not found on the earth's surface in a free state, because it easily oxidises under the action of air. It is occasionally found in the native state in meteorites, or aerolites, which fall upon the earth.

Meteoric iron is formed outside the earth.[1] Meteorites are fragments which are carried round the sun in orbits, and fall upon the earth when coming into proximity with it during their motion in space. The meteoric dust, on passing through the upper parts of the atmosphere, and becoming incandescent from friction with the gases, produces that phenomenon which is familiar under the name of falling stars.[2] Such is the doctrine concerning meteorites, and therefore the fact of their containing rocky (siliceous) matter and metallic iron shows that outside the earth the elements and their aggregation are in some degree the same as upon the earth itself.

The most widely diffused terrestrial compound of iron is iron bisulphide, FeS2, or iron pyrites. It occurs in formations of both aqueous and igneous origin, and sometimes in enormous masses. It is a substance having a greyish-yellow colour, with a metallic lustre, and a specific gravity of 5·0; it crystallises in the regular system.[2 bis]

The oxides are the principal ores used for producing metallic iron. The majority of the ores contain ferric oxide, Fe2O3, either in a free state or combined with water, or else in combination with ferrous oxide, FeO. The species and varieties of iron ores are numerous and diverse. Ferric oxide in a separate form appears sometimes as crystals of the rhombohedric system, having a metallic lustre and greyish steel colour; they are brittle, and form a red powder, specific gravity about 5·25. Ferric oxide in type of oxidation and properties resembles alumina; it is, however, although with difficulty, soluble in acids even when anhydrous. The crystalline oxide bears the name of specular iron ore, but ferric oxide most often occurs in a non-crystalline form, in masses having a red fracture, and is then known as red hÆmatite. In this form, however, it is rather a rare ore, and is principally found in veins. The hydrates of ferric oxide, ferric hydroxides,[3] are most often found in aqueous or stratified formations, and are known as brown hÆmatites; they generally have a brown colour, form a yellowish-brown powder, and have no metallic lustre but an earthy appearance. They easily dissolve in acids and diffuse through other formations, especially clays (for instance, ochre); they sometimes occur in reniform and similar masses, evidently of aqueous origin. Such are, for instance, the so-called bog or lake and peat ores found at the bottom of marshes and lakes, and also under and in peat beds. This ore is formed from water containing ferrous carbonate in solution, which, after absorbing oxygen, deposits ferric hydroxide. In rivers and springs, iron is found in solution as ferrous carbonate through the agency of carbonic acid: hence the existence of chalybeate springs containing FeCO3. This ferrous carbonate, or siderite, is either found as a non-crystalline product of evidently aqueous origin, or as a crystalline spar called spathic iron ore. The reniform deposits of the former are most remarkable; they are called spherosiderites, and sometimes form whole strata in the jurassic and carboniferous formations. Magnetic iron ore, Fe3O4 = FeO,Fe2O3, in virtue of its purity and practical uses, is a very important ore; it is a compound of the ferrous and ferric oxides, is naturally magnetic, has a specific gravity of 5·1, crystallises in well-formed crystals of the regular system, is with difficulty soluble in acids, and sometimes forms enormous masses, as, for instance, Mount Blagodat in the Ural. However, in most cases—for instance, at Korsak-Mogila (to the north of Berdiansk and Nogaiska, near the Sea of Azov), or at Krivoi Rog (to the west of Ekaterinoslav)—the magnetic iron ore is mixed with other iron ores. In the Urals, the Caucasus (without mentioning Siberia), and in the districts adjoining the basin of the Don, Russia possesses the richest iron ores in the world. To the south of Moscow, in the Governments of Toula and Nijninovgorod, in the Olonetz district, and in the Government of Orloffsky (near Zinovieff in the district of Kromsky), and in many other places, there are likewise abundant supplies of iron ores amongst the deposited aqueous formations; the siderite of Orloffsky, for instance, is distinguished by its great purity.[4]

Iron is also found in the form of various other compounds—for instance, in certain silicates, and also in some phosphates; but these forms are comparatively rare in nature in a pure state, and have not the industrial importance of those natural compounds of iron previously mentioned. In small quantities iron enters into the composition of every kind of soil and all rocky formations. As ferrous oxide, FeO, is isomorphous with magnesia, and ferric oxide, Fe2O3, with alumina, isomorphous substitution is possible here, and hence minerals are not unfrequently found in which the quantity of iron varies considerably; such, for instance, are pyroxene, amphibole, certain varieties of mica, &c. Although much iron oxide is deleterious to the growth of vegetation, still plants do not flourish without iron; it enters as an indispensable component into the composition of all higher organisms; in the ash of plants we always find more or less of its compounds. It also occurs in blood, and forms one of the colouring matters in it; 100 parts of the blood of the highest organisms contain about 0·05 of iron.

The reduction of the ores of iron into metallic iron is in principle very simple, because when the oxides of iron are strongly heated with charcoal, hydrogen, carbonic oxide, and other reducing agents,[5] they easily give metallic iron. But the matter is rendered more difficult by the fact that the iron does not melt at the heat developed by the combustion of the charcoal, and therefore it does not separate from those mechanically mixed impurities which are found in the iron ore. This is obviated by the following very remarkable property of iron: at a high temperature it is capable of combining with a small quantity (from 2 to 5 p.c.) of carbon, and then forms cast iron, which easily melts in the heat developed by the combustion of charcoal in air. For this reason metallic iron is not obtained directly from the ore, but is only formed after the further treatment of the cast iron; the first product extracted from the ore being cast iron. The fused mass disposes itself in the furnace below the slag—that is, the impurities of the ore fused by the heat of the furnace. If these impurities did not fuse they would block up the furnace in which the ore was being smelted, and the continuous smelting of the cast iron would not be possible;[6] it would be necessary periodically to cool the furnace and heat it up again, which means a wasteful expenditure of fuel, and hence in the production of cast iron, the object in view is to obtain all the earthy impurities of the ore in the shape of a fused mass or slag. Only in rare cases does the ore itself form a mass which fuses at the temperature employed, and these cases are objectionable if much iron oxide is carried away in the slag. The impurities of the ores most often consist of certain mixtures—for instance, a mixture of clay and sand, or a mixture of limestone and clay, or quartz, &c. These impurities do not separate of themselves, or do not fuse. The difficulty of the industry lies in forming an easily-fusible slag, into which the whole of the foreign matter of the ore would pass and flow down to the bottom of the furnace above the heavier cast iron. This is effected by mixing certain fluxes with the ore and charcoal. A flux is a substance which, when mixed with the foreign matter of the ore, forms a fusible vitreous mass or slag. The flux used for silica is limestone with clay; for limestone a definite quantity of silica is used, the best procedure having been arrived at by experiment and by long practice in iron smelting and other metallurgical processes.[7]

Thus the following materials have to be introduced into the furnace where the smelting of the iron ore is carried on: (1) the iron ore, composed of oxide of iron and foreign matter; (2) the flux required to form a fusible slag with the foreign matter; (3) the carbon which is necessary (a) for reducing, (b) for combining with the reduced iron to form cast iron, (c) principally for the purpose of combustion and the heat generated thereby, necessary not only for reducing the iron and transforming it into cast iron, but also for melting the slag, as well as the cast iron—and (4) the air necessary for the combustion of the charcoal. The air is introduced after a preparatory heating in order to economise fuel and to obtain the highest temperature. The air is forced in under pressure by means of a special blast arrangement. This permits of an exact regulation of the heat and rate of smelting. All these component parts necessary for the smelting of iron must be contained in a vertical, that is, shaft furnace, which at the base must have a receptacle for the accumulation of the slag and cast iron formed, in order that the operation may proceed without interruption. The walls of such a furnace ought to be built of fireproof materials if it be designed to serve for the continuous production of cast iron by charging the ore, fuel, and flux into the mouth of the furnace, forcing a blast of air into the lower part, and running out the molten iron and slag from below. The whole operation is conducted in furnaces known as blast furnaces. The annexed illustration, fig. 93 (which is taken by kind permission from Thorpe's Dictionary of Applied Chemistry), represents the vertical section of such a furnace. These furnaces are generally of large dimensions—varying from 50 to 90 feet in height. They are sometimes built against rising ground in order to afford easy access to the top where the ore, flux, and charcoal or coke are charged.[8]

[325]
[326]

The cast iron formed in blast furnaces is not always of the same quality. When slowly cooled it is soft, has a grey colour, and is not completely soluble in acids. When treated with acids a residue of graphite remains; it is known as grey or soft cast iron. This is the general form of the ordinary cast iron used for casting various objects, because in this state it is not so brittle as in the shape of white cast iron, which does not leave particles of graphite when dissolved, but yields its carbon in the form of hydrocarbons. This white cast iron is characterised by its whitish-grey colour, dull lustre, the crystalline structure of its fracture (more homogeneous than that of grey iron), and such hardness that a file will hardly cut it. When white cast iron is produced (from manganese ore) at high temperatures (and with an excess of lime), and containing little sulphur and silica but a considerable amount of carbon (as much as 5 p.c.), it acquires a coarse crystalline structure which increases in proportion to the amount of manganese, and it is then known under the name of ‘spiegeleisen’ (and ‘ferro-manganese’).[9]

Cast iron is a material which is either suitable for direct application for casting in moulds or else for working up into wrought iron and steel. The latter principally differ from cast iron in their containing less carbon—thus, steel contains from 1 p.c. to 0·5 p.c. of carbon and far less silicon and manganese than cast iron; wrought iron does not generally contain more than 0·25 p.c. of carbon and not more than 0·25 p.c. of the other impurities. Thus the essence of the working up of cast iron into steel and wrought iron consists in the removal of the greater part of the carbon and other elements, S, P, Mn, Si, &c. This is effected by means of oxidation, because the oxygen of the atmosphere, oxidising the iron at a high temperature, forms solid oxides with it; and the latter, coming into contact with the carbon contained in the cast iron, are deoxidised, forming wrought iron and carbonic oxide, which is evolved from the mass in a gaseous form. It is evident that the oxidation must be carried on with a molten mass in a state of agitation, so that the oxygen of the air may be brought into contact with the whole mass of carbon contained in the cast iron, or else the operation is effected by means of the addition of oxygen compounds of iron (oxides, ores, as in Martin's process). Cast iron melts much more easily than wrought iron and steel, and, therefore, as the carbon separates, the mass in the furnace (in puddling) or hearth (in the bloomery process) becomes more and more solid; moreover the degree of hardness forms, to a certain extent, a measure of the amount of carbon separated, and the operation may terminate either in the formation of steel or wrought iron.[10] In any case, the iron used for industrial purposes contains impurities. Chemically pure iron may be obtained by precipitating iron from a solution (a mixture of ferrous sulphate with magnesium sulphate or ammonium chloride) by the prolonged action of a feeble galvanic current; the iron may be then obtained as a dense[330]
[331]
[332]
mass. This method, proposed by BÖttcher and applied by Klein, gives, as R. Lenz showed, iron containing occluded hydrogen, which is disengaged on heating. This galvanic deposition of iron is used for making galvanoplastic clichÉs, which are distinguished for their great hardness. Electro-deposited iron is brittle, but if heated (after the separation of the hydrogen) it becomes soft. If pure ferric hydroxide, which is easily prepared by the precipitation of solutions of ferric salts by means of ammonia, be heated in a stream of hydrogen, it forms, first of all, a dull black powder which ignites spontaneously in air (pyrophoric iron), and then a grey powder of pure iron. The powdery substance first obtained is an iron suboxide; when thrown into the air it ignites, forming the oxide Fe3O4. If the heating in hydrogen be continued, more water and pure iron, which does not ignite spontaneously, will be obtained. If a small quantity of iron be fused in the oxyhydrogen flame (with an excess of oxygen) in a piece of lime and mixed with powdered glass, pure molten iron will be formed, because in the oxyhydrogen flame iron melts and burns, but the substances mixed with the iron oxidise first. The oxidised impurities here either disappear (carbonic anhydride) in a gaseous form, or turn into slag (silica, manganese, oxide, and others)—that is, fuse with the glass. Pure iron has a silvery white colour and a specific gravity of 7·84; it melts at a temperature higher than the melting-points of silver, gold, nickel, and steel, i.e. about 1400°-1500° and below the melting point of platinum (1750°).[11] But pure iron becomes soft at a temperature considerably below that at which it melts, and may then be easily forged, welded, and rolled or drawn into sheets and wire.[11 bis] Pure iron may be rolled into an exceedingly thin sheet, weighing less than a sheet of ordinary paper of the same size. This ductility is the most important property of iron in all its forms, and is most marked with sheet iron, and least so with cast iron, whose ductility, compared with wrought iron, is small, but it is still very considerable when compared with other substances—such, for instance, as rocks.[12]

The chemical properties of iron have been already repeatedly mentioned in preceding chapters. Iron rusts in air at the ordinary temperature—that is to say, it becomes covered with a layer of iron oxides. Here, without doubt, the moisture of the air plays a part, because in dry air iron does not oxidise at all, and also because, more particularly, ammonia is always found in iron rust; the ammonia must arise from the action of the hydrogen of the water, at the moment of its separation, on the nitrogen of the air. Highly-polished steel does not rust nearly so readily, but if moistened with water, it easily becomes coated with rust. As rust depends on the access of moisture, iron may be preserved from rust by coating it with substances which prevent the moisture having access to it. Thus arises the practice of covering iron objects with paraffin,[13] varnish, oil, paints, or enamelling it with a glassy-looking flux possessing the same coefficient of expansion as iron, or with a dense scoria (formed by the heat of superheated steam), or with a compact coating of various metals. Wrought iron (both as sheet iron and in other forms), cast iron, and steel are often coated with tin, copper, lead, nickel, and similar metals, which prevent contact with the air. These metals preserve iron very effectually from rust if they form a completely compact surface, but in those places where the iron becomes exposed, either accidentally or from wear, rust appears much more quickly than on a uniform iron surface, because, towards these metals (and also towards the rust), the iron will then behave as an electro-positive pole in a galvanic couple, and hence will attract oxygen. A coating of zinc does not produce this inconvenience, because iron is electro-negative with reference to zinc, in consequence of which galvanised iron does not easily rust, and even an iron boiler containing some lumps of zinc rusts less than one without zinc.[14] Iron oxidises at a high temperature, forming iron scale, Fe3O4, composed of ferrous and ferric oxides, and, as has been seen, decomposes water and acids with the evolution of hydrogen. It is also capable of decomposing salts and oxides of other metals, which property is applied in the arts for the extraction of copper, silver, lead, tin, &c. For this reason iron is soluble in the solutions of many salts—for instance, in cupric sulphate, with precipitation of copper and formation of ferrous sulphate.[15] When iron acts on acids it always forms compounds FeX2—that is, corresponding to the suboxide FeO—and answering to magnesium compounds—and hence two atoms of hydrogen are replaced by one atom of iron. Strongly oxidising acids like nitric acid may transform the ferrous salt which is forming into the higher degree of oxidation or ferric salt (corresponding with the sesquioxide, Fe2O3), but this is a secondary reaction. Iron, although easily soluble in dilute nitric acid, loses this property when plunged into strong fuming nitric acid; after this operation it even loses the property of solubility in other acids until the external coating formed by the action of the strong nitric acid is mechanically removed. This condition of iron is termed the passive state. The passive condition of iron depends on the formation, on its surface, of a coating of oxide due to the iron being acted on by the lower oxides of nitrogen contained in the fuming nitric acid.[16] Strong nitric acid which does not contain these lower oxides, does not render iron passive, but it is only necessary to add some alcohol or other reducing agent which forms these lower oxides in the nitric acid, and the iron will assume the passive state.

Iron readily combines with non-metals—for instance, with chlorine, iodine, bromine, sulphur, and even with phosphorus and carbon; but on the other hand the property of combining with metals is but little developed in it—that is to say, it does not easily form alloys. Mercury, which acts on most metals, does not act directly on iron, and the iron amalgam, or solution of iron in mercury, which is used for electrical machines, is only obtained in a particular way—namely, with the co-operation of a sodium amalgam, in which the iron dissolves and by means of which it is reduced from solutions of its salts.

When iron acts on acids it forms ferrous salts of the type FeX2, and in the presence of air and oxidising agents they change by degrees into ferric salts of the type FeX3. This faculty of passing from the ferrous to the ferric state is still further developed in ferrous hydroxide. If sodium hydroxide be added to a solution of ferrous sulphate or green vitriol, FeSO4,[17] a white precipitate of ferrous hydroxide, FeH2O2, is obtained; but on exposure to the air, even under water, it turns green, becomes grey, and finally turns brown, which is due to the oxidation that it undergoes. Ferrous hydroxide is very sparingly soluble in water; the solution has, however, a distinct alkaline reaction, which is due to its being a fairly energetic basic oxide. In any case, ferrous oxide is far more energetic than ferric oxide, so that if ammonia be added to a solution containing a mixture of a ferrous and ferric salt, at first ferric hydroxide only will be precipitated. If barium carbonate, BaCO3, be shaken up in the cold with ferrous salts, it does not precipitate them—that is, does not change them into ferrous carbonate; but it completely separates all the iron from the ferric salts in the cold, according to the equation Fe2Cl6 + 3BaCO3 + 3H2O = Fe2O3,3H2O + 3BaCl2 + 3CO2. If ferrous hydroxide be boiled with a solution of potash, the water is decomposed, hydrogen is evolved, and the ferrous hydroxide is oxidised. The ferrous salts are in all respects similar to the salts of magnesium and zinc; they are isomorphous with them, but differ from them in that the ferrous hydroxide is not soluble either in aqueous potash or ammonia. In the presence of an excess of ammonium salts, however, a certain proportion of the iron is not precipitated by alkalis and alkali carbonates, which fact points to the formation of double ammonium salts.[18] The ferrous salts have a dull greenish colour, and form solutions also of a pale green colour, whilst the ferric salts have a brown or reddish-brown colour. The ferrous salts, being capable of oxidation, form very active reducing agents—for instance, under their action gold chloride, AuCl3, deposits metallic gold, nitric acid is transformed into lower oxides, and the highest oxides of manganese also pass into the lower forms of oxidation. All these reactions take place with especial ease in the presence of an excess of acid. This depends on the fact that the ferrous oxide, FeO (or salt), acting as a reducing agent, turns into ferric oxide, Fe2O3 (or salt), and in the ferric state it requires more acid for the formation of a normal salt than in the ferrous condition. Thus in the normal ferrous sulphate, FeSO4, there is one equivalent of iron to one equivalent of sulphur (in the sulphuric radicle), but in the neutral ferric salt, Fe2(SO4)3, there is one equivalent of iron to one and a half of sulphur in the form of the elements of sulphuric acid.[19]

The most simple oxidising agent for transforming ferrous into ferric salts is chlorine in the presence of water—for instance, 2FeCl2 + Cl2 = Fe2Cl6, or, generally speaking, 2FeO + Cl2 + H2O = Fe2O3 + 2HCl. When such a transformation is required it is best to add potassium chlorate and hydrochloric acid to the ferrous solution; chlorine is formed by their mutual reaction and acts as an oxidising agent. Nitric acid produces a similar effect, although more slowly. Ferrous salts may be completely and rapidly oxidised into ferric salts by means of chromic acid or permanganic acid, HMnO4, in the presence of acids—for example, 10FeSO4 + 2KMnO4 + 8H2SO4 = 5Fe2(SO4)3 + 2MnSO4 + K2SO4 + 8H2O. This reaction is easily observed by the change of colour, and its termination is easily seen, because potassium permanganate forms solutions of a bright red colour, and when added to a solution of a ferrous salt the above reaction immediately takes place in the presence of acid, and the solution then becomes colourless, because all the substances formed are only faintly coloured in solution. Directly all the ferrous compound has passed into the ferric state, any excess of permanganate which is added communicates a red colour to the liquid (see Chapter XXI.)

Thus when ferrous salts are acted on by oxidising agents, they pass into the ferric form, and under the action of reducing agents the reverse reaction occurs. Sulphuretted hydrogen may, for instance, be used for this complete transformation, for under its influence ferric salts are reduced with separation of sulphur—for example, Fe2Cl6 + H2S = 2FeCl2 + 2HCl + S. Sodium thiosulphate acts in a similar way: Fe2Cl6 + Na2S2O3 + H2O = 2FeCl2 + Na2SO4 + 2HCl + S. Metallic iron or zinc,[20] in the presence, of acids, or sodium amalgam, &c., acts like hydrogen, and has also a similar reducing action, and this furnishes the best method for reducing ferric salts to ferrous salts—for instance, Fe2Cl6 + Zn = 2FeCl2 + ZnCl2. Thus the transition from ferrous salts to ferric salts and vice vers is always possible.[21]

Ferric oxide, or sesquioxide of iron, Fe2O3, is found in nature, and is artificially prepared in the form of a red powder by many methods. Thus after heating green vitriol a red oxide of iron remains, called colcothar, which is used as an oil paint, principally for painting wood. The same substance in the form of a very fine powder (rouge) is used for polishing glass, steel, and other objects. If a mixture of ferrous sulphate with an excess of common salt be strongly heated, crystalline ferric oxide will be formed, having a dark violet colour, and resembling some natural varieties of this substance. When iron pyrites is heated for preparing sulphurous anhydride, ferric oxide also remains behind; it is used as a pigment. On the addition of alkalis to a solution of ferric salts, a brown precipitate of ferric hydroxide is formed, which when heated (even when boiled in water, that is, at about 100°, according to Tomassi) easily parts with the water, and leaves red anhydrous ferric oxide. Pure ferric oxide does not show any magnetic properties, but when heated to a white heat it loses oxygen and is converted into the magnetic oxide. Anhydrous ferric oxide which has been heated to a high temperature is with difficulty soluble in acids (but it is soluble when heated in strong acids, and also when fused with potassium hydrogen sulphate), whilst ferric hydroxide, at all events that which is precipitated from salts by means of alkalis, is very readily soluble in acids. The precipitated ferric hydroxide has the composition 2Fe2O33H2O, or Fe4H6O9. If this ordinary hydroxide be rendered anhydrous (at 100°), at a certain moment it becomes incandescent—that is, loses a certain quantity of heat. This self-incandescence depends on internal displacement produced by the transition of the easily-soluble (in acids) variety into the difficultly-soluble variety, and does not depend on the loss of water, since the anhydrous oxide undergoes the same change. In addition to this there exists a ferric hydroxide, or hydrated oxide of iron, which, like the strongly-heated anhydrous iron oxide, is difficultly soluble in acids. This hydroxide on losing water, or after the loss of water, does not undergo such self-incandescence, because no such state of internal displacement occurs (loss of energy or heat) with it as that which is peculiar to the ordinary oxide of iron. The ferric hydroxide which is difficultly soluble in acids has the composition Fe2O3,H2O. This hydroxide is obtained by a prolonged ebullition of water in which ferric hydroxide prepared by the oxidation of ferrous oxide is suspended, and also sometimes by similar treatment of the ordinary hydroxide after it has been for a long time in contact with water. The transition of one hydroxide to another is apparent by a change of colour; the easily-soluble hydroxide is redder, and the sparingly-soluble hydroxide more yellow in colour.[22]

The normal salts of the composition Fe2X6 or FeX3 correspond with ferric oxide—for example, the exceedingly volatile ferric chloride, Fe2Cl6, which is easily prepared in the anhydrous state by the action of chlorine on heated iron.[23] Such also is the normal ferric nitrate,[341]
[342]
Fe2(NO3)6; it is obtained by dissolving iron in an excess of nitric acid, taking care as far as possible to prevent any rise of temperature.[24] The normal salt separates from the brown solution when it is concentrated under a bell jar over sulphuric acid. This salt, Fe2(NO3)6,9H2O, then crystallises in well-formed and perfectly colourless crystals,[25] which deliquesce in air, melt at 35°, and are soluble in and decomposed by water. The decomposition may be seen from the fact that the solution is brown and does not yield the whole of the salt again, but gives partly basic salt. The normal salt (only stable in the presence of an excess of HNO3) is completely decomposed with great facility by heating with water, even at 130°, and this is made use of for removing iron (and also certain other oxides of the form R2O3) from many other bases (of the form RO) whose nitrates are far more stable. The ferric salts, FeX3, in passing into ferrous salts, act as oxidising agents, as is seen from the fact that they not only liberate S from SH2, but also iodine from KI like many oxidising agents.[25 bis]

Iron forms one other oxide besides the ferric and ferrous oxides; this contains twice as much oxygen as the former, but is so very unstable that it can neither be obtained in the free state nor as a hydrate. Whenever such conditions of double decomposition occur as should allow of its separation in the free state, it decomposes into oxygen and ferric oxide. It is known in the state of salts, and is only stable in the presence of alkalis, and forms salts with them which have a decidedly alkaline reaction; it is therefore a feebly acid oxide. Thus when small pieces of iron are heated with nitre or potassium chlorate a potassium salt of the composition K2FeO4 is formed, and therefore the hydrate corresponding with this salt should have the composition H2FeO4. It is called ferric acid. Its anhydride ought to contain FeO3 or Fe2O6—twice as much oxygen as ferric oxide. If a solution of potassium ferrate be mixed with acid, the free hydrate ought to be formed, but it immediately decomposes (2K2FeO4 + 5H2SO4 = 2K2SO4 + Fe2(SO4)3 + 5H2O + O3), oxygen being evolved. If a small quantity of acid be taken, or if a solution of potassium ferrate be heated with solutions of other metallic salts, ferric oxide is separated—for instance:

2CuSO4 + 2K2FeO4 = 2K2SO4 + O3 + Fe2O3 + 2CuO.

Both these oxides are of course deposited in the form of hydrates. This shows that not only the hydrate H2FeO4, but also the salts of the heavy metals corresponding with this higher oxide of iron, are not formed by reactions of double decomposition. The solution of potassium ferrate naturally acts as a powerful oxidising agent; for instance, it transforms manganous oxide into the dioxide, sulphurous into sulphuric acid, oxalic acid into carbonic anhydride and water, &c.[26]

Iron thus combines with oxygen in three proportions: RO, R2O3, and RO3. It might have been expected that there would be intermediate stages RO2 (corresponding to pyrites FeS2) and R2O5, but for iron these are unknown.[26 bis] The lower oxide has a distinctly basic character, the higher is feebly acid. The only one which is stable in the free state is ferric oxide, Fe2O3; the suboxide, FeO, absorbs oxygen, and ferric anhydride, FeO3, evolves it. It is also the same for other elements; the character of each is determined by the relative degree of stability of the known oxides. The salts FeX2 correspond with the suboxide, the salts FeX3 or Fe2X6 with the sesquioxide, and FeX6 represents those of ferric acid, as its potassium salt is FeO2(OK)2, corresponding with K2SO4, K2MnO4, K2CrO4, &c. Iron therefore forms compounds of the types FeX2, FeX3, and FeX6, but this latter, like the type NX5, does not appear separately, but only when X represents heterogeneous elements or groups; for instance, for nitrogen in the form of NO2(OH), NH4Cl, &c., for iron in the form of FeO2(OK)2. But still the type FeX6 exists, and therefore FeX2 and FeX3 are compounds which, like ammonia, NH3, are capable of further combinations up to FeX6; this is also seen in the property of ferrous and ferric salts of forming compounds with water of crystallisation, besides double and basic salts, whose stability is determined by the quality of the elements included in the types FeX2 and FeX3.[26 tri] It is therefore to be expected that there should be complex compounds derived from ferrous and ferric oxides. Amongst these the series of cyanogen compounds is particularly interesting; their formation and character is not only determined by the property which iron possesses of forming complex types, but also by the similar faculty of the cyanogen compounds, which, like nitriles (Chapter IX.), have clearly developed properties of polymerisation and in general of forming complex compounds.[27]

In the cyanogen compounds of iron, two degrees might be expected: Fe(CN)2, corresponding with ferrous oxide, and Fe(CN)3, corresponding with ferric oxide. There are actually, however, many other known compounds, intermediate and far more complex. They correspond with the double salts so easily formed by metallic cyanides. The two following double salts are particularly well known, very stable, often used, and easily prepared. Potassium ferrocyanide or yellow prussiate of potash, a double salt of cyanide of potassium and ferrous cyanide, has the composition FeC2N2,4KCN; its crystals contain 3 mol. of water: K4FeC6N6,3H2O. The other is potassium ferricyanide or red prussiate of potash. It is also known as Gmelin's salt, and contains cyanide of potassium with ferric cyanide; its composition is Fe(CN)3,3KCN or K3FeC6N6. Its crystals do not contain water. It is obtained from the first by the action of chlorine, which removes one atom of the potassium. A whole series of other ferrocyanic compounds correspond with these ordinary salts.

Before treating of the preparation and properties of these two remarkable and very stable salts, it must be observed that with ordinary reagents neither of them gives the same double decompositions as the other ferrous and ferric salts, and they both present a series of remarkable properties. Thus these salts have a neutral reaction, are unchanged by air, dilute acids, or water, unlike potassium cyanide and even some of its double salts. When solutions of these salts are treated with caustic alkalis, they do not give a precipitate of ferrous or ferric hydroxides, neither are they precipitated by sodium carbonate. This led the earlier investigators to recognise special independent groupings in them. The yellow prussiate was considered to contain the complex radicle FeC6N6 combined with potassium, namely with K4, and K3 was attributed to the red prussiate. This was confirmed by the fact that whilst in both salts any other metal, even hydrogen, might be substituted for potassium, the iron remained unchangeable, just as nitrogen in cyanogen, ammonium, and nitrates does not enter into double decomposition, being in the state of the complex radicles CN, NH4, NO2. Such a representation is, however, completely superfluous for the explanation of the peculiarities in the reactions of such compounds as double salts. If a magnesium salt which can be precipitated by potassium hydroxide does not form a precipitate in the presence of ammonium chloride, it is very clear that it is owing to the formation of a soluble double salt which is not decomposed by alkalis. And there is no necessity to account for the peculiarity of reaction of a double salt by the formation of a new complex radicle. In the same way also, in the presence of an excess of tartaric acid, cupric salts do not form a precipitate with potassium hydroxide, because a double salt is formed. These peculiarities are more easily understood in the case of cyanogen compounds than in all others, because all cyanogen compounds, as unsaturated compounds, show a marked tendency to complexity. This tendency is satisfied in double salts. The appearance of a peculiar character in double cyanides is the more easily understood since in the case of potassium cyanide itself, and also in hydrocyanic acid, a great many peculiarities have been observed which are not encountered in those haloid compounds, potassium chloride and hydrochloric acid, with which it was usual to compare cyanogen compounds. These peculiarities become more comprehensible on comparing cyanogen compounds with ammonium compounds. Thus in the presence of ammonia the reactions of many compounds change considerably. If in addition to this it is remembered that the presence of many carbon (organic) compounds frequently completely disturbs the reaction of salts, the peculiarities of certain double cyanides will appear still less strange, because they contain carbon. The fact that the presence of carbon or another element in the compound produces a change in the reactions, may be compared to the action of oxygen, which, when entering into a combination, also very materially changes the nature of reactions. Chlorine is not detected by silver nitrate when it is in the form of potassium chlorate, KClO3, as it is detected in potassium chloride, KCl. The iron in ferrous and ferric compounds varies in its reactions. In addition to the above-mentioned facts, consideration ought to be given to the circumstance that the easy mutability of nitric acid undergoes modification in its alkali salts, and in general the properties of a salt often differ much from those of the acid. Every double salt ought to be regarded as a peculiar kind of saline compound: potassium cyanide is, as it were, a basic, and ferrous cyanide an acid, element. They may be unstable in the separate state, but form a stable double compound when combined together; the act of combination disengages the energy of the elements, and they, so to speak, saturate each other. Of course, all this is not a definite explanation, but then the supposition of a special complex radicle can even less be regarded as such.

Potassium ferrocyanide, K4FeC6N6, is very easily formed by mixing solutions of ferrous sulphate and potassium cyanide. First, a white precipitate of ferrous cyanide, FeC2N2, is formed, which becomes blue on exposure to air, but is soluble in an excess of potassium cyanide, forming the ferrocyanide. The same yellow prussiate is obtained on heating animal nitrogenous charcoal or animal matters—such as horn, leather cuttings, &c.—with potassium carbonate in iron vessels,[27 bis] the mass formed being afterwards boiled with water with exposure to air, potassium cyanide first appearing, which gives yellow prussiate. The animal charcoal may be exchanged for wood charcoal, permeated with potassium carbonate and heated in nitrogen or ammonia; the mass thus produced is then boiled in water with ferric oxide.[28] In this manner it is manufactured on the large scale, and is called ‘yellow prussiate’ (‘prussiate de potasse,’ Blutlaugensalz).

It is easy to substitute other metals for the potassium in the yellow prussiate. The hydrogen salt or hydroferrocyanic acid, H4FeC6N6, is obtained by mixing strong solutions of yellow prussiate and hydrochloric acid. If ether be added and the air excluded, the acid is obtained directly in the form of a white scarcely crystalline precipitate which becomes blue on exposure to air (as ferrous cyanide does from the formation of blue compounds of ferrous and ferric cyanides, and it is on this account used in cotton printing). It is soluble in water and alcohol, but not in ether, has marked acid properties, and decomposes carbonates, which renders it easily possible to prepare ferrocyanides of the metals of the alkalis and alkaline earths; these are readily soluble, have a neutral reaction, and resemble the yellow prussiate. Solutions of these salts form precipitates with the salts of other metals, because the ferrocyanides of the heavy metals are insoluble. Here either the whole of the potassium of the yellow prussiate, or only a part of it, is exchanged for an equivalent quantity of the heavy metal. Thus, when a cupric salt is added to a solution of yellow prussiate, a red precipitate is obtained which still contains half the potassium of the yellow prussiate:

K4FeC6N6 + CuSO4 = K2CuFeC6N6 + K2SO4.

But if the process be reversed (the salt of copper being then in excess) the whole of the potassium will be exchanged for copper, forming a reddish-brown precipitate, Cu2FeC6N6,9H2O. This reaction and those similar to it are very sensitive and may be used for detecting metals in solution, more especially as the colour of the precipitate very often shows a marked difference when one metal is exchanged for another. Zinc, cadmium, lead, antimony, tin, silver, cuprous and aurous salts form white precipitates; cupric, uranium, titanium and molybdenum salts reddish-brown; those of nickel, cobalt, and chromium, green precipitates; with ferrous salts, ferrocyanide forms, as has been already mentioned, a white precipitate—namely, Fe2FeC6N6, or FeC2N2—which turns blue on exposure to air, and with ferric salts a blue precipitate called Prussian blue. Here the potassium is replaced by iron, the reaction being expressed thus: 2Fe2Cl6 + 3K4FeC6N6 = 12KCl + Fe4Fe3C18N18, the latter formula expressing the composition of Prussian blue. It is therefore the compound 4Fe(CN)3 + 3Fe(CN)2. The yellow prussiate is prepared in chemical works on a large scale especially for the manufacture of this blue pigment, which is used for dyeing cloth and other fabrics and also as one of the ordinary blue paints. It is insoluble in water, and the stuffs are therefore dyed by first soaking them in a solution of a ferric salt and then in a solution of yellow prussiate. If however an excess of yellow prussiate be present complete substitution between potassium and iron does not occur, and soluble Prussian blue is formed; KFe2(CN)6 = KCN,Fe(CN)2,Fe(CN)3. This blue salt is colloidal, is soluble in pure water, but insoluble and precipitated when other salts—for instance, potassium or sodium chloride—are present even in small quantities, and is therefore first obtained as a precipitate.[29]

Potassium ferricyanide, or red prussiate of potash, K3FeC6N6, is called ‘Gmelin's salt,’ because this savant obtained it by the action of chlorine on a solution of the yellow prussiate: K4FeC6N6 + Cl = K3FeC6N6 + KCl. The reaction is due to the ferrous salt being changed by the action of the chlorine into a ferric salt. It separates from solutions in anhydrous, well-formed prisms of a red colour, but the solution has an olive colour; 100 parts of water, at 10°, dissolve 37 parts of the salt, and at 100°, 78 parts.[30] The red prussiate gives a blue precipitate with ferrous salts, called Turnbull's blue, very much like Prussian blue (and the soluble variety), because it also contains ferrous cyanide and ferric cyanide, although in another proportion, being formed according to the equation: 3FeCl2 + 2K3FeC6N6 = 6KCl + Fe3Fe2C12N12, or 3FeC2N2,Fe2C6N6; in Prussian blue we have Fe7Cy18, and here Fe5Cy12. A ferric salt ought to form ferric cyanide Fe2C6N6, with red prussiate, but ferric cyanide is soluble, and therefore no precipitate is obtained, and the liquid only becomes brown.[31]

If chlorine and sodium are representatives of independent groups of elements, the same may also be said of iron. Its nearest analogues show, besides a similarity in character, a likeness as regards physical properties and a proximity in atomic weight. Iron occupies a medium position amongst its nearest analogues, both with respect to properties and faculty of forming saline oxides, and also as regards atomic weight. On the one hand, cobalt, 58, and nickel, 59, approach iron, 56; they are metals of a more basic character, they do not form stable acids or higher degrees of oxidation, and are a transition to copper, 63, and zinc, 65. On the other hand, manganese, 55, and chromium, 52, are the nearest to iron; they form both basic and acid oxides, and are a transition to the metals possessing acid properties. In addition to having atomic weights approximately alike, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, and copper have also nearly the same specific gravity, so that the atomic volumes and the molecules of their analogous compounds are also near to one another (see table at the beginning of this volume). Besides this, the likeness between the above-mentioned elements is also seen from the following:

They form suboxides, RO, fairly energetic bases, isomorphous with magnesia—for instance, the salt RSO4,7H2O, akin to MgSO4,7H2O, and FeSO4,7H2O, or to sulphates containing less water; with alkali sulphates all form double salts crystallising with 6H2O; all are capable of forming ammonium salts, &c. The lower oxides, in the cases of nickel and cobalt, are tolerably stable, are not easily oxidised (the nickel compound with more difficulty than cobalt, a transition to copper); with manganese, and especially with chromium, they are more easily oxidised than with iron and pass into higher oxides. They also form oxides of the form R2O3, and with nickel, cobalt, and manganese this oxide is very unstable, and is more easily reduced than ferric oxide; but, in the case of chromium, it is very stable, and forms the ordinary kind of salts. It is isomorphous with ferric oxide, forms alums, is a feeble base, &c. Chromium, manganese, and iron are oxidised by alkali and oxidising agents, forming salts like Na2SO4; but cobalt and nickel are difficult to oxidise; their acids are not known with any certainty, and are, in all probability, still less stable than the ferrates. Cr, Mn and Fe form compounds R2Cl6 which are like Fe2Cl6 in many respects; in Co this faculty is weaker and in Ni it has almost disappeared. The cyanogen compounds, especially of manganese and cobalt, are very near akin to the corresponding ferrocyanides. The oxides of nickel and cobalt are more easily reduced to metal than those of iron, but those of manganese and chromium are not reduced so easily as iron, and the metals themselves are not easily obtained in a pure state; they are capable of forming varieties resembling cast iron. The metals Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, and Ni have a grey iron colour and are very difficult to melt, but nickel and cobalt can be melted in the reverberatory furnace and are more fusible than iron, whilst chromium is more difficult to melt than platinum (Deville). These metals decompose water, but with greater difficulty as the atomic weight rises, forming a transition to copper, which does not decompose water. All the compounds of these metals have various colours, which are sometimes very bright, especially in the higher stages of oxidation.

These metals of the iron group are often met with together in nature. Manganese nearly everywhere accompanies iron, and iron is always an ingredient in the ores of manganese. Chromium is found principally as chrome ironstone—that is, a peculiar kind of magnetic oxide in which Fe2O3 is replaced by Cr2O3.

Nickel and cobalt are as inseparable companions as iron and manganese. The similarity between them even extends to such remote properties as magnetic qualities. In this series of metals we find those which are the most magnetic: iron, cobalt, and nickel. There is even a magnetic oxide among the chromium compounds, such being unknown in the other series. Nickel easily becomes passive in strong nitric acid. It absorbs hydrogen in just the same way as iron. In short, in the series Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, and Ni, there are many points in common although there are many differences, as will be seen still more clearly on becoming acquainted with cobalt and nickel.

In nature cobalt is principally found in combination with arsenic and sulphur. Cobalt arsenide, or cobalt speiss, CoAs2, is found in brilliant crystals of the regular system, principally in Saxony. Cobalt glance, CoAs2CoS2, resembles it very much, and also belongs to the regular system; it is found in Sweden, Norway, and the Caucasus. Kupfernickel is a nickel ore in combination with arsenic, but of a different composition from cobalt arsenide, having the formula NiAs; it is found in Bohemia and Saxony. It has a copper-red colour and is rarely crystalline; it is so called because the miners of Saxony first mistook it for an ore of copper (Kupfer), but were unable to extract copper from it. Nickel glance, NiS2,NiAs2, corresponding with cobalt glance, is also known. Nickel accompanies the ores of cobalt and cobalt those of nickel, so that both metals are found together. The ores of cobalt are worked in the Caucasus in the Government of Elizavetopolsk. Nickel ores containing aqueous hydrated nickel silicate are found in the Ural (Revdansk). Large quantities of a similar ore are exported into Europe from New Caledonia. Both ores contain about 12 per cent. Ni. Garnierite, (RO)5(SiO2)41½H2O, where R = Ni and Mg, predominates in the New Caledonian ore. Large deposits of nickel have been discovered in Canada, where the ore (as nickelous pyrites) is free from arsenic. Cobalt is principally worked up into cobalt compounds, but nickel is generally reduced to the metallic state, in which it is now often used for alloys—for instance, for coinage in many European States, and for plating other metals, because it does not oxidise. Cobalt arsenide and cobalt glance are principally used for the preparation of cobalt compounds; they are first sorted by discarding the rocky matter, and then roasted. During this process most of the sulphur and arsenic disappears; the arsenious anhydride volatilises with the sulphurous anhydride and the metal also oxidises.[32] It is a simple matter to obtain nickel and cobalt from their oxides. In order to obtain the latter, solutions of their salts are treated with sodium carbonate and the precipitated carbonates are heated; the suboxides are thus obtained, and these latter are reduced in a stream of hydrogen, or even by heating with ammonium chloride. They easily oxidise when in the state of powder. When the chlorides of nickel and cobalt are heated in a stream of hydrogen, the metal is deposited in brilliant scales. Nickel is always much more easily and quickly reduced than cobalt. Nickel melts more easily than cobalt, and this even furnishes a means of testing the heating powers of a reverberatory furnace. Cobalt fuses at a temperature only a little lower than that at which iron does. In general, cobalt is nearer to iron than nickel, nickel being nearer to copper.[32 bis] Both nickel and cobalt have magnetic properties like iron, but Co is less magnetic than Fe, and Ni still less so. The specific gravity of nickel reduced by hydrogen is 9·1 and that of cobalt 8·9. Fused cobalt has a specific gravity of 8·5, the density of ordinary nickel being almost the same. Nickel has a greyish silvery-white colour; it is brilliant and very ductile, so that the finest wire may be easily drawn from it. This wire has a resistance to tension equal to iron wire. The beautiful colour of nickel, and the high polish which it is capable of receiving and retaining, as it does not oxidise, render it a useful metal for many purposes, and in many ways it resembles silver.[32 tri] It is now very common to cover other metals with a layer of nickel (nickel plating). This is done by a process of electro-plating, using a solution of a nickel salt. The colour of cobalt is dark and redder; it is also ductile, and has a greater tensile resistance than iron. Dilute acids act very slowly on nickel and cobalt; nitric acid may be considered as the best solvent for them. The solutions in every case contain salts corresponding with the ferrous salts—that is, the salts CoX2, NiX2, correspond with the suboxides of these metals. These salts in their types are similar to the magnesium salts. The salts of nickel when crystallising with water have a green colour, and form bright green solutions, but in the anhydrous state they most frequently have a yellow colour. The salts of cobalt are generally rose-coloured, and generally blue when in the anhydrous state. Their aqueous solutions are rose-coloured. Cobaltous chloride is easily soluble in alcohol, and forms a solution of an intense blue colour.[33]

If a solution of potassium hydroxide be added to a solution of a cobalt salt, a blue precipitate of the basic salt will be formed. If a solution of a cobalt salt be heated almost to the boiling-point, and the solution be then mixed with a boiling solution of an alkali hydroxide, a pink precipitate of cobaltous hydroxide, CoH2O2, will be formed. If air be not completely excluded during the precipitation by boiling, the precipitate will also contain brown cobaltic hydroxide formed by the further oxidation of the cobaltous oxide.[34] Under similar circumstances nickel salts form a green precipitate of nickelous hydroxide, the formation of which is not hindered by the presence of ammonium salts, but in that case only requires more alkali to completely separate the nickel. The nickelous oxide obtained by heating the hydroxide, or from the carbonate or nitrate, is a grey powder, easily soluble in acids and easily reduced, but the same substance may be obtained in the crystalline form as an ordinary product from the ores; it crystallises in regular octahedra, with a metallic lustre, and is of a grey colour. In this state the nickelous oxide almost resists the action of acids.[34 bis]

It is interesting to note the relation of the cobaltous and nickelous hydroxides to ammonia; aqueous ammonia dissolves the precipitate of cobaltous and nickelous hydroxide. The blue ammoniacal solution of nickel resembles the same solution of cupric oxide, but has a somewhat reddish tint. It is characterised by the fact that it dissolves silk in the same way as the ammoniacal cupric oxide dissolves cellulose. Ammonia likewise dissolves the precipitate of cobaltous hydroxide, forming a brownish liquid, which becomes darker in air and finally assumes a bright red hue, absorbing oxygen. The admixture of ammonium chloride prevents the precipitation of cobalt salts by ammonia; when the ammonia is added, a brown solution is obtained from which, as in the case of the preceding solution, potassium hydroxide does not separate the cobaltous oxide. Peculiar compounds are produced in this solution; they are comparatively stable, containing ammonia and an excess of oxygen; they bear the name cobaltoamine and cobaltiamine salts. They have been principally investigated by Genth, FrÉmy, JÖrgenson and others. Genth found that when a cobalt salt, mixed with an excess of ammonium chloride, is treated with ammonia and exposed to the air, after a certain lapse of time, on adding hydrochloric acid and boiling, a red powder is precipitated and the remaining solution contains an orange salt. The study of these compounds led to the discovery of a whole series of similar salts, some of which correspond with particular higher degrees of oxidation of cobalt, which are described later.[35][360]
[361]
[362]
[363]
[364]
[365]
Nickel does not possess this property of absorbing the oxygen of the air when in an ammoniacal solution. In order to understand this distinction, and in general the relation of nickel, it is important to observe that cobalt more easily forms a higher degree of oxidation—namely, sesquioxide of cobalt, cobaltic oxide, Co2O3—than nickel, especially in the presence of hypochlorous acid. If a solution of a cobalt salt be mixed with barium carbonate and an excess of hypochlorous acid be added, or chlorine gas be passed through it, then at the ordinary temperature on shaking, the whole of the cobalt will be separated in the form of black cobaltic oxide: 2CoSO4 + ClHO + 2BaCO3 = Co2O3 + 2BaSO4 + HCl + 2CO2. Under these circumstances nickelous oxide does not immediately form black sesquioxide, but after a considerable space of time it also separates in the form of sesquioxide, Ni2O3, but always later than cobalt. This is due to the relative difficulty of further oxidation of the nickelous oxide. It is, however, possible to oxidise it; if, for instance, the hydroxide NiH2O2 be shaken in water and chlorine gas be passed through it, then nickel chloride will be formed, which is soluble in water, and insoluble nickelic oxide in the form of a black precipitate: 3NiH2O2 + Cl2 = NiCl2 + Ni2O3,3H2O. Nickelic oxide may also be obtained by adding sodium hypochlorite mixed with alkali to a solution of a nickel salt. Nickelic and cobaltic hydrates are black. Nickelic oxide evolves oxygen with all acids, and in consequence of this it is not separated as a precipitate in the presence of acids; thus it evolves chlorine with hydrochloric acid, exactly like manganese dioxide. When nickelic oxide is dissolved in aqueous ammonia it liberates nitrogen, and an ammoniacal solution of nickelous oxide is formed. When heated, nickelic oxide loses oxygen, forming nickelous oxide. Cobaltic oxide, Co2O3, exhibits more stability than nickelic oxide, and shows feeble basic properties; thus it is dissolved in acetic acid without the evolution of oxygen.[35 bis] But ordinary acids, especially on heating, evolve oxygen, forming a solution of a cobaltous salt. The presence of a cobaltic salt in a solution of a cobaltous salt may be detected by the brown colour of the solution and the black precipitate formed by the addition of alkali, and also from the fact that such solutions evolve chlorine when heated with hydrochloric acid. Cobaltic oxide may not only be prepared by the above-mentioned methods, but also by heating cobalt nitrate, after which a steel-coloured mass remains which retains traces of nitric acid, but when heated further to incandescence evolves oxygen, leaving a compound of cobaltic and cobaltous oxides, similar to magnetic ironstone. Cobalt (but not nickel) undoubtedly forms besides Co2O3 a dioxide CoO2. This is obtained[36] when the cobaltous oxide is oxidised by iodine or peroxide of barium.[37]

Nickel alloys possess qualities which render them valuable for technical purposes, the alloy of nickel with iron being particularly remarkable. This alloy is met with in nature as meteoric iron. The Pallasoffsky mass of meteoric iron, preserved in the St. Petersburg Academy, fell in Siberia in the last century; it weighs about 15 cwt. and contains 88 p.c. of iron and about 10 p.c. of nickel, with a small admixture of other metals. In the arts German silver is most extensively used; it is an alloy containing nickel, copper, and zinc in various proportions. It generally consists of about 50 parts of copper, 25 parts of zinc, and 25 parts of nickel. This alloy is characterised by its white colour resembling that of silver, and, like this latter metal, it does not rust, and therefore furnishes an excellent substitute for silver in the majority of cases where it is used. Alloys which contain silver in addition to nickel show the properties of silver to a still greater extent. Alloys of nickel are used for currency, and if rich deposits of nickel are discovered a wide field of application lies before it, not only in a pure state (because it is a beautiful metal and does not rust) but also for use in alloys. Steel vessels (pressed or forged out of sheet steel) covered with nickel have such practical merits that their manufacture, which has not long commenced, will most probably be rapidly developed, whilst nickel steel, which exceeds ordinary steel in its tenacity, has already proved its excellent qualities for many purposes (for instance, for armour plate).

Until 1890 no compound of cobalt or nickel was known of sufficient volatility to determine the molecular weights of the compounds of these metals; but in 1890 Mr. L. Mond, in conducting (together with Langer and Quincke) his researches on the action of nickel upon carbonic oxide (Chapter IX., Note 24 bis), observed that nickel gradually volatilises in a stream of carbonic oxide; this only takes place at low temperatures, and is seen by the coloration of the flame of the carbonic oxide. This observation led to the discovery of a remarkable volatile compound of nickel and carbonic oxide, having as molecular composition Ni(CO)4,[38] as determined by the vapour density and depression of the freezing point. Cobalt and many other metals do not form volatile compounds under these conditions, but iron gives a similar product (Note 26 bis). Ni(CO)4 is prepared by taking finely divided Ni (obtained by reducing NiO by heating it in a stream of hydrogen, or by igniting the oxalate NiC2O4)[39] and passing (at a temperature below 50°, for even at 60° decomposition may take place and an explosion) a stream of CO over it; the latter carries over the vapour of the compound, which condenses (in a well-cooled receiver) into a perfectly colourless extremely mobile liquid, boiling without decomposition at 43°, and crystallising in needles at -25° (Mond and Nasini, 1891). Liquid Ni(CO)4 has a sp. gr. 1·356 at 0°, is insoluble in water, dissolves in alcohol and benzene, and burns with a very smoky flame due to the liberation of Ni. The vapour when passed through a tube heated to 180° and above deposits a brilliant coating of metal, and disengages CO. If the tube be strongly heated the decomposition is accompanied by an explosion. If Ni(CO)4 as vapour be passed through a solution of CuCl2, it reduces the latter to metal; it has the same action upon an ammoniacal solution of AgCl, strong nitric acid oxidises Ni(CO)4, dilute solutions of acids have no action; if the vapour be passed through strong sulphuric acid, CO is liberated, chlorine gives NiCl and COCl2; no simple reactions of double decomposition are yet known for Ni(CO)4, however, so that its connection with other carbon compounds is not clear. Probably the formation of this compound could be applied for extracting nickel from its ores.[40]

Footnotes:

[1] The composition of meteoric iron is variable. It generally contains nickel, phosphorus, carbon, &c. The schreibersite of meteoric stones contains Fe4Ni2P.

[2] Comets and the rings of Saturn ought now to be considered as consisting of an accumulation of such meteoric cosmic particles. Perhaps the part played by these minute bodies scattered throughout space is much more important in the formation of the largest celestial bodies than has hitherto been imagined. The investigation of this branch of astronomy, due to Schiaparelli, has a bearing on the whole of natural science.

The question arises as to why the iron in meteorites is in a free state, whilst on earth it is in a state of combination. Does not this tend to show that the condition of our globe is very different from that of the rest? My answer to this question has been already given in Volume I. p. 377, Note 57. It is my opinion that inside the earth there is a mass similar in composition to meteorites—that is, containing rocky matter and metallic iron, partly carburetted. In conclusion, I consider it will not be out of place to add the following explanations. According to the theory of the distribution of pressures (see my treatise, On Barometrical Levelling, 1876, pages 48 et seq.) in an atmosphere of mixed gases, it follows that two gases, whose densities are d and d1, and whose relative quantities or partial pressures at a certain distance from the centre of gravity are h and h1, will, when at a greater distance from the centre of attraction, present a different ratio of their masses x : x1—that is, of their partial pressures—which may be found by the equation d1(log(h) - log(x)) = d(log(h1) - log(x1)). If, for instance, d : d1 = 2 : 1, and h = h1 (that is to say, the masses are equal at the lower height) = 1000, then when x = 10 the magnitude of x1 will not be 10 (i.e. the mass of a gas at a higher level whose density = 1 will not be equal to the mass of a gas whose density = 2, as was the case at a lower level), but much greater—namely, x1 = 100—that is, the lighter gas will predominate over a heavier one at a higher level. Therefore, when the whole mass of the earth was in a state of vapour, the substances having a greater vapour density accumulated about the centre and those with a lesser vapour density at the surface. And as the vapour densities depend on the atomic and molecular weights, those substances which have small atomic and molecular weights ought to have accumulated at the surface, and those with high atomic and molecular weights, which are the least volatile and the easiest to condense, at the centre. Thus it becomes apparent why such light elements as hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, phosphorus, sulphur, chlorine, potassium, calcium, and their compounds predominate at the surface and largely form the earth's crust. There is also now much iron in the sun, as spectrum analysis shows, and therefore it must have entered into the composition of the earth and other planets, but would have accumulated at the centre, because the density of its vapour is certainly large and it easily condenses. There was also oxygen near the centre of the earth, but not sufficient to combine with the iron. The former, as a much lighter element, principally accumulated at the surface, where we at the present time find all oxidised compounds and even a remnant of free oxygen. This gives the possibility not only of explaining in accordance with cosmogonic theories the predominance of oxygen compounds on the surface of the earth, with the occurrence of unoxidised iron in the interior of the earth and in meteorites, but also of understanding why the density of the whole earth (over 5) is far greater than that of the rocks (1 to 3) composing its crust. And if all the preceding arguments and theories (for instance the supposition that the sun, earth, and all the planets were formed of an elementary homogeneous mass, formerly composed of vapours and gases) be true, it must be admitted that the interior of the earth and other planets contains metallic (unoxidised) iron, which, however, is only found on the surface as aerolites. And then assuming that aerolites are the fragments of planets which have crumbled to pieces so to say during cooling (this has been held to be the case by astronomers, judging from the paths of aerolites), it is readily understood why they should be composed of metallic iron, and this would explain its occurrence in the depths of the earth, which we assumed as the basis of our theory of the formation of naphtha (Chapter VIII., Notes 57–60).

[2 bis] Immense deposits of iron pyrites are known in various parts of Russia. On the river Msta, near Borovitsi, thousands of tons are yearly collected from the detritus of the neighbouring rocks. In the Governments of Toula, Riazan, and in the Donets district continuous layers of pyrites occur among the coal seams. Very thick beds of pyrites are also known in many parts of the Caucasus. But the deposits of the Urals are particularly vast, and have been worked for a long time. Amongst these I will only indicate the deposits on the Soymensky estate near the Kishteimsky works; the Kaletinsky deposits near the Virhny-Isetsky works (containing 1–2 p.c. Cu); on the banks of the river Koushaivi near Koushvi (3–5 p.c. Cu), and the deposits near the Bogoslovsky works (3–5 p.c. Cu). Iron pyrites (especially that containing copper which is extracted after roasting) is now chiefly employed for roasting, as a source of SO2, for the manufacture of chamber sulphuric acid (Vol. I. p. 291), but the remaining oxide of iron is perfectly suitable for smelting into pig iron, although it gives a sulphurous pig iron (the sulphur may be easily removed by subsequent treatment, especially with the aid of ferro-manganese in Bessemer's process). The great technical importance of iron pyrites leads to its sometimes being imported from great distances; for instance, into England from Spain. Besides which, when heated in closed retorts FeS2 gives sulphur, and if allowed to oxidise in damp air, green vitriol, FeSO4.

[3] The hydrated ferric oxide is found in nature in a dual form. It is somewhat rarely met with in the form of a crystalline mineral called gÖthite, whose specific gravity is 4·4 and composition Fe2H3O4, or FeHO2—that is, one of oxide of iron to one of water, Fe2O3,H2O; frequently found as brown ironstone, forming a dense mass of fibrous, reniform deposits containing 2Fe2O3,3H2O—that is, having a composition Fe4H6O9. In bog ore and other similar ores we most often find a mixture of this hydrated ferric oxide with clay and other impurities. The specific gravity of such formations is rarely as high as 4·0.

[4] The ores of iron, similarly to all substances extracted from veins and deposits, are worked according to mining practice by means of vertical, horizontal, or inclined shafts which reach and penetrate the veins and strata containing the ore deposits. The mass of ore excavated is raised to the surface, then sorted either by hand or else in special sorting apparatus (generally acting with water to wash the ore), and is subjected to roasting and other treatment. In every case the ore contains foreign matter. In the extraction of iron, which is one of the cheapest metals, the dressing of an ore is in most cases unprofitable, and only ores rich in metal are worked—namely, those containing at least 20 p.c. It is often profitable to transport very rich and pure ores (with as much as 70 p.c. of iron) from long distances. The details concerning the working and extraction of metals will be found in special treatises on metallurgy and mining.

[5] The reduction of iron oxides by hydrogen belongs to the order of reversible reactions (Chapter II.), and is therefore determined by a limit which is here expressed by the attainment of the same pressure as in the case where hydrogen acts on iron oxides, and as in the case where (at the same temperature) water is decomposed by metallic iron. The calculations referring to this matter were made by Henri Sainte-Claire Deville (1870). Spongy iron was placed in a tube having a temperature t, one end of which was connected with a vessel containing water at 0° (vapour tension = 4·6 mm.) and the other end with a mercury pump and pressure gauge which determined the limiting tension attained by the dry hydrogen p (subtracting the tension of the water vapour from the tension observed). A tube was then taken containing an excess of iron oxide. It was filled with hydrogen, and the tension p1 observed of the residual hydrogen when the water was condensed at 0°.

t = 200° 440° 860° 1040°
p = 95·9 25·8 12·8 9·2 mm.
p1 = 12·8 9·4 mm.

The equality of the pressure (tension) of the hydrogen in the two cases is evident. The hydrogen here behaves like the vapour of iron or of its oxide.

By taking ferric oxide, Fe2O3, Moissan observed that at 350° it passed into magnetic oxide, Fe3O4, at 500° into ferrous oxide, FeO, and at 600° into metallic iron. Wright and Luff (1878), whilst investigating the reduction of oxides, found that (a) the temperature of reaction depends on the condition of the oxide taken—for instance, precipitated ferric oxide is reduced by hydrogen at 85°, that obtained by oxidising the metal or from its nitrate at 175°; (b) when other conditions are the same, the reduction by carbonic oxide commences earlier than that by hydrogen, and the reduction by hydrogen still earlier than that by charcoal; (c) the reduction is effected with greater facility when a greater quantity of heat is evolved during the reaction. Ferric oxide obtained by heating ferrous sulphate to a red heat begins to be reduced by carbonic oxide at 202°, by hydrogen at 260°, by charcoal at 430°, whilst for magnetic oxide, Fe3O4, the temperatures are 200°, 290°, and 450° respectively.

[6] The primitive methods of iron manufacture were conducted by intermittent processes in hearths resembling smiths' fires. As evidenced by the uninterrupted action of the steam boiler, or the process of lime burning, and the continuous preparation and condensation of sulphuric acid or the uninterrupted smelting of iron, every industrial process becomes increasingly profitable and complete under the condition of the continuous action, as far as possible, of all agencies concerned in the production. This continuous method of production is the first condition for the profitable production on the large scale of nearly all industrial products. This method lessens the cost of labour, simplifies the supervision of the work, renders the product uniform, and frequently introduces a very great economy in the expenditure of fuel and at the same time presents the simplicity and perfection of an equilibrated system. Hence every manufacturing operation should be a continuous one, and the manufacture of pig iron and sulphuric acid, which have long since become so, may be taken as examples in many respects. A study of these two manufactures should form the commencement of an acquaintance with all the contemporary methods of manufacturing both from a technical and economical point of view.

[7] The composition of slag suitable for iron smelting most often approaches the following: 50 to 60 p.c. SiO2, 5 to 20 Al2O3, the rest of the mass consisting of MgO, CaO, MnO, FeO. Thus the most fusible slag (according to the observations of Bodeman) contains the alloy Al2O3,4CaO,7SiO2. On altering the quantity of magnesia and lime, and especially of the alkalis (which increases the fusibility) and of silica (which decreases it), the temperature of fusion changes with the relation between the total quantity of oxygen and that in the silica. Slags of the composition RO,SiO2 are easily fusible, have a vitreous appearance, and are very common. Basic slags approach the composition 2RO,SiO2. Hence, knowing the composition and quantity of the foreign matter in the ore, it is at once easy to find the quantity and quality of the flux which must be added to form a suitable slag. The smelting of iron is rendered more complex by the fact that the silica, SiO2, which enters into the slag and fluxes is capable of forming a slag with the iron oxides. In order that the least quantity of iron may pass into the slag, it is necessary for it to be reduced before the temperature is attained at which the slags are formed (about 1000°), which is effected by reducing the iron, not with charcoal itself, but with carbonic oxide. From this it will be understood how the progress of the whole treatment may be judged by the properties of the slags. Details of this complicated and well-studied subject will be found in works on metallurgy.

[8] The section of a blast furnace is represented by two truncated cones joined at their bases, the upper cone being longer than the lower one; the lower cone is terminated by the hearth, or almost cylindrical cavity in which the cast iron and slag collect, one side being provided with apertures for drawing off the iron and slag. The air is blown into the blast furnace through special pipes, situated over the hearth, as shown in the section. The air previously passes through a series of cast-iron pipes, heated by the combustion of the carbonic oxide obtained from the upper parts of the furnace, where it is formed as in a ‘gas-producer.’ The blast furnace acts continuously until it is worn out; the iron is tapped off twice a day, and the furnace is allowed to cool a little from time to time so as not to be spoilt by the increasing heat, and to enable it to withstand long usage.

Blast furnaces worked with charcoal fuel are not so high, and in general give a smaller yield than those using coke, because the latter are worked with heavier charges than those in which charcoal is employed. Coke furnaces yield 20,000 tons and over of pig iron a year. In the United States there are blast furnaces 30 metres high, and upwards of 600 cubic metres capacity, yielding as much as 130,000 tons of pig iron, requiring a blast of about 750 cubic metres of air per minute, heated to 600°, and consuming about 0·85 part of coke per 1 part of pig iron produced. At the present time the world produces as much as 30 million tons of pig iron a year, about 9/10 of which is converted into wrought iron and steel. The chief producers are the United States (about 10 million tons a year) and England (about 9 million tons a year); Russia yields about 1? million tons a year. The world's production has doubled during the last 20 years, and in this respect the United States have outrun all other countries. The reason of this increase of production must be looked for in the increased demand for iron and steel for railway purposes, for structures (especially ship-building), and in the fact that: (a) the cost of pig iron has fallen, thanks to the erection of large furnaces and a fuller study of the processes taking place in them, and (b) that every kind of iron ore (even sulphurous and phosphoritic) can now be converted into a homogeneous steel.

see caption

Fig. 93.—Vertical section of a modern Cleveland blast furnace capable of producing 300 to 1,000 tons of pig iron weekly. The outer casing is of riveted iron plates, the furnace being lined with refractory fire-brick. It is closed at the top by a ‘cap and cone’ arrangement, by means of which the charge can be fed into the furnace at suitable intervals by lowering the moveable cone.

In order to more thoroughly grasp the chemical process which takes place in blast furnaces, it is necessary to follow the course of the material charged in at the top and of the air passing through the furnace. From 50 to 200 parts of carbon are expended on 100 parts of iron. The ore, flux, and coke are charged into the top of the furnace, in layers, as the cast iron is formed in the lower parts and flowing down to the bottom causes the whole contents of the furnace to subside, thus forming an empty space at the top, which is again filled up with the afore-mentioned mixture. During its downward course this mixture is subjected to increasing heat. This rise of temperature first drives off the moisture of the ore mixture, and then leads to the formation of the products of the dry distillation of coal or charcoal. Little by little the subsiding mass attains a temperature at which the heated carbon reacts with the carbonic anhydride passing upwards through the furnace and transforms it into carbonic oxide. This is the reason why carbonic anhydride is not evolved from the furnace, but only carbonic oxide. As regards the ore itself, on being heated to about 600° to 800° it is reduced at the expense of the carbonic oxide ascending the furnace, and formed by the contact of the carbonic anhydride with the incandescent charcoal, so that the reduction in the blast furnace is without doubt brought about by the formation and decomposition of carbonic oxide and not by carbon itself—thus, Fe2O3 + 3CO = Fe2 + 3CO2. The reduced iron, on further subsidence and contact with carbon, forms cast iron, which flows to the bottom of the furnace. In these lower layers, where the temperature is highest (about 1,300°), the foreign matter of the ore finally forms slag, which also is fusible, with the aid of fluxes. The air blown in from below, through the so-called tuyeres, encounters carbon in the lower layers of the furnace, and burns it, converting it into carbonic anhydride. It is evident that this develops the highest temperature in these lower layers of the furnace, because here the combustion of the carbon is effected by heated and compressed air. This is very essential, for it is by virtue of this high temperature that the process of forming the slag and of forming and fusing the cast iron are effected simultaneously in these lower portions of the furnace. The carbonic acid formed in these parts rises higher, encounters incandescent carbon, and forms with it carbonic oxide. This heated carbonic oxide acts as a reducing agent on the iron ore, and is reconverted by it into carbonic anhydride; this gas meets with more carbon, and again forms carbonic oxide, which again acts as a reducing agent. The final transformation of the carbonic anhydride into carbonic oxide is effected in those parts of the furnace where the reduction of the oxides of iron does not take place, but where the temperature is still high enough to reduce the carbonic anhydride. The ascending mixture of carbonic oxide and nitrogen, CO2, &c., is then withdrawn through special lateral apertures formed in the upper cold parts of the furnace walls, and is conducted through pipes to those stoves which are used for heating the air, and also sometimes into other furnaces used for the further processes of iron manufacture. The fuel of blast furnaces consists of wood charcoal (this is the most expensive material, but the pig iron produced is the purest, because charcoal does not contain any sulphur, while coke does), anthracite (for instance, in Pennsylvania, and in Russia at Pastouhoff's works in the Don district), coke, coal, and even wood and peat. It must be borne in mind that the utilisation of naphtha and naphtha refuse would probably give very profitable results in metallurgical processes.

The process just described is accompanied by a series of other processes. Thus, for instance, in the blast furnace a considerable quantity of cyanogen compounds are formed. This takes place because the nitrogen of the air blast comes into contact with incandescent carbon and various alkaline matters contained in the foreign matter of the ores. A considerable quantity of potassium cyanide is formed when wood charcoal is employed for iron smelting, as its ash is rich in potash.

[9] The specific gravity of white cast iron is about 7·5. Grey cast iron has a much lower specific gravity, namely, 7·0. Grey cast iron generally contains less manganese and more silica than white; but both contain from 2 to 3 p.c. of carbon. The difference between the varieties of cast iron depends on the condition of the carbon which enters into the composition of the iron. In white cast iron the carbon is in combination with the iron—in all probability, as the compound CFe4 (Abel and Osmond and others extracted this compound, which is sometimes called ‘carbide,’ from tempered steel, which stands to unannealed steel as white cast iron does to grey), but perhaps in the state of an indefinite chemical compound resembling a solution. In any case the compound of the iron and carbon in white cast iron is chemically very unstable, because when slowly cooled it decomposes, with separation of graphite, just as a solution when slowly cooled yields a portion of the substance dissolved. The separation of carbon in the form of graphite on the conversion of white cast iron into grey is never complete, however slowly the separation be carried on; part of the carbon remains in combination with the iron in the same state in which it exists in white cast iron. Hence when grey cast iron is treated with acids, the whole of the carbon does not remain in the form of graphite, but a part of it is separated as hydrocarbons, which proves the existence of chemically-combined carbon in grey cast iron. It is sufficient to re-melt grey cast iron and to cool it quickly to transform it into white cast iron. It is not carbon alone that influences the properties of cast iron; when it contains a considerable amount of sulphur, cast iron remains white even after having been slowly cooled. The same is observed in cast iron very rich in manganese (5 to 7 p.c.), and in this latter case the fracture is very distinctly crystalline and brilliant. When cast iron contains a large amount of manganese, the quantity of carbon may also be increased. Crystalline varieties of cast iron rich in manganese are in practice called ferro-manganese (p. 310), and are prepared for the Bessemer process. Grey cast iron not having an uniform structure is much more liable to various changes than dense and thoroughly uniform white cast iron, and the latter oxidises much more slowly in air than the former. White cast iron is not only used for conversion into wrought iron and steel, but also in those cases where great hardness is required, although it be accompanied by a certain brittleness; for instance, for making rollers, plough-shares, &c.

[10] This direct process of separating the carbon from cast iron is termed puddling. It is conducted in reverberatory furnaces. The cast iron is placed on the bed of the furnace and melted; through a special aperture, the puddler stirs up the oxidising mass of cast iron, pressing the oxides into the molten iron. This resembles kneading dough, and the process introduced in England became known as puddling. It is evident that the puddled mass, or bloom, is a heterogeneous substance obtained by mixing, and hence one part of the mass will still be rich in carbon, another will be poor, some parts will contain oxide not reduced, &c. The further treatment of the puddled mass consists in hammering and drawing it out into flat pieces, which on being hammered become more homogeneous, and when several pieces are welded together and again hammered out a still more homogeneous mass is obtained. The quality of the steel and iron thus formed depends principally on their uniformity. The want of uniformity depends on the oxides remaining inside the mass, and on the variable distribution of the carbon throughout the mass. In order to obtain a more homogeneous metal for manufacturing articles out of steel, it is drawn into thin rods, which are tied together in bundles and then again hammered out. As an example of what may be attained in this direction, imitation Damascus steel may be cited; it consists of twisted and plaited wire, which is then hammered into a dense mass. (Real damascened wootz steel may be made by melting a mixture of the best iron with graphite (1/12) and iron rust; the article is then corroded with acid, and the carbon remains in the form of a pattern.)

Steel and wrought iron are manufactured from cast iron by puddling. They are, however, obtained not only by this method but also by the bloomery process, which is carried out in a fire similar to a blacksmith's forge, fed with charcoal and provided with a blast; a pig of cast iron is gradually pushed into the fire, and portions of it melt and fall to the bottom of the hearth, coming into contact with an air blast, and are thus oxidised. The bloom thus formed is then squeezed and hammered. It is evident that this process is only available when the charcoal used in the fire does not contain any foreign matter which might injure the quality of the iron or steel—for instance, sulphur or phosphorus—and therefore only wood charcoal may be used with impunity, from which it follows that this process can only be carried on where the manufacture of iron can be conducted with this fuel. Coal and coke contain the above-mentioned impurities, and would therefore produce iron of a brittle nature, and thus it would be necessary to have recourse to puddling, where the fuel is burnt on a special hearth, separate from the cast iron, whereby the impurities of the fuel do not come into contact with it. The manufacture of steel from cast iron may also be conducted in fires; but, in addition to this, it is also now prepared by many other methods. One of the long-known processes is called cementation, by which steel is prepared from wrought iron but not from cast iron. For this process strips of iron are heated red-hot for a considerable time whilst immersed in powdered charcoal; during this operation the iron at the surface combines with the charcoal, which however does not penetrate; after this the iron strips are re-forged, drawn out again, and cemented anew, repeating this process until a steel of the desired quality is formed—that is, containing the requisite proportion of carbon. The Bessemer process occupies the front rank among the newer methods (since 1856); it is so called from the name of its inventor. This process consists in running melted cast iron into converters (holding about 6 tons of cast iron)—that is, egg-shaped receivers, fig. 94, capable of revolving on trunnions (in order to charge in the cast iron and discharge the steel), and forcing a stream of air through small apertures at a considerable pressure. Combustion of the iron and carbon at an elevated temperature then takes place, resulting from the bubbles of oxygen thus penetrating the mass of the cast iron. The carbon, however, burns to a greater extent than the iron, and therefore a mass is obtained which is much poorer in carbon than cast iron. As the combustion proceeds very rapidly in the mass of metal, the temperature rises to such an extent that even the wrought iron which may be formed remains in a molten condition, whilst the steel, being more fusible than the wrought iron, remains very liquid. In half an hour the mass is ready. The purest possible cast iron is used in the Bessemer process, because sulphur and phosphorus do not burn out like carbon, silicon, and manganese.

see caption

Fig. 94.—Bessemer converter, constructed of iron plate and lined with ganister. The air is carried by the tubes, L, O, D to the bottom, M, from which it passes by a number of holes into the converter. The converter is rotated on the trunnion d by means of the rack and pinion H, when it is required either to receive molten cast iron from the melting furnaces or to pour out the steel.

The presence of manganese enables the sulphur to be removed with the slag, and the presence of lime or magnesia, which are introduced into the lining of the converter, facilitates the removal of the phosphorus. This basic Bessemer process, or Thomas Gilchrist process, introduced about 1880, enables ores containing a considerable amount of phosphorus, which had hitherto only been used for cast iron, to be used for making wrought iron and steel. Naturally the greatest uniformity will be obtained by re-melting the metal. Steel is re-melted in small wind furnaces, in masses not exceeding 30 kilos; a liquid metal is formed, which may be cast in moulds. A mixture of wrought and cast iron is often used for making cast steel (the addition of a small amount of metallic Al improves the homogeneity of the castings, by facilitating the passage of the impurities into slag). Large steel castings are made by simultaneous fusion in several furnaces and crucibles; in this way, castings up to 80 tons or more, such as large ordnance, may be made. This molten, and therefore homogeneous, steel is called cast steel. Of late years the Martin's process for the manufacture of steel has come largely into use; it was invented in France about 1860, and with the use of regenerative furnaces it enables large quantities of cast steel to be made at a time. It is based on the melting of cast iron with iron oxides and iron itself—for instance, pure ores, scrap, &c. There the carbon of the cast iron and the oxygen of the oxide form carbonic oxide, and the carbon therefore burns out, and thus cast steel is obtained from cast iron, providing, naturally, that there is a requisite proportion and corresponding degree of heat. The advantage of this process is that not only do the carbon, silicon, and manganese, but also a great part of the sulphur and phosphorus of the cast iron burn out at the expense of the oxygen of the iron oxides. During the last decade the manufacture of steel and its application for rails, armour plate, guns, boilers, &c., has developed to an enormous extent, thanks to the invention of cheap processes for the manufacture of large masses of homogeneous cast steel. Wrought iron may also be melted, but the heat of a blast furnace is insufficient for this. It easily melts in the oxyhydrogen flame. It may be obtained in a molten state directly from cast iron, if the latter be melted with nitre and sufficiently stirred up. Considerable oxidation then takes place inside the mass of cast iron, and the temperature rises to such an extent that the wrought iron formed remains liquid. A method is also known for obtaining wrought iron directly from rich iron ores by the action of carbonic oxide: the wrought iron is then formed as a spongy mass (which forms an excellent filter for purifying water), and may be worked up into wrought iron or steel either by forging or by dissolving in molten cast iron.

Everybody is more or less familiar with the difference in the properties of steel and wrought iron. Iron is remarkable for its softness, pliability, and small elasticity, whilst steel may be characterised by its capability of attaining elasticity and hardness if it be cooled suddenly after having been heated to a definite temperature, or, as it is termed, tempered. But if tempered steel be re-heated and slowly cooled, it becomes as soft as wrought iron, and can then be cut with the file and forged, and in general can be made to assume any shape, like wrought iron. In this soft condition it is called annealed steel. The transition from tempered to annealed steel thus takes place in a similar way to the transition from white to grey cast iron. Steel, when homogeneous, has considerable lustre, and such a fine granular structure that it takes a very high polish. Its fracture clearly shows the granular nature of its structure. The possibility of tempering steel enables it to be used for making all kinds of cutting instruments, because annealed steel can be forged, turned, drawn (under rollers, for instance, for making rails, bars, &c.), filed, &c., and it may then be tempered, ground and polished. The method and temperature of tempering and annealing steel determine its hardness and other qualities. Steel is generally tempered to the required degree of hardness in the following manner: It is first strongly heated (for instance, up to 600°), and then plunged into water—that is, hardened by rapid cooling (it then becomes as brittle as glass). It is then heated until the surface assumes a definite colour, and finally cooled either quickly or slowly. When steel is heated up to 220°, its surface acquires a yellow colour (surgical instruments); it first of all becomes straw-coloured (razors, &c.), and then gold-coloured; then at a temperature of 250° it becomes brown (scissors), then red, then light blue at 285° (springs), then indigo at 300° (files), and finally sea-green at about 340°. These colours are only the tints of thin films, like the hues of soap bubbles, and appear on the steel because a thin layer of oxides is formed over its surface. Steel rusts more slowly than wrought iron, and is more soluble in acids than cast iron, but less so than wrought iron. Its specific gravity is about 7·6 to 7·9.

As regards the formation of steel, it was a long time before the process of cementation was thoroughly understood, because in this case infusible charcoal permeates unfused wrought iron. Caron showed that this permeation depends on the fact that the charcoal used in the process contains alkalis, which, in the presence of the nitrogen of the air, form metallic cyanides; these being volatile and fusible, permeate the iron, and, giving up their carbon to it, serve as the material for the formation of steel. This explanation is confirmed by the fact that charcoal without alkalis or without nitrogen will not cement iron. The charcoal used for cementation acts badly when used over again, as it has lost alkali. The very volatile ammonium cyanide easily conduces to the formation of steel. Although steel is also formed by the action of cyanogen compounds, nevertheless it does not contain more nitrogen than cast or wrought iron (0·01 p.c.), and these latter contain it because their ores contain titanium, which combines directly with nitrogen. Hence the part played by nitrogen in steel is but an insignificant one. It may be useful here to add some information taken from Caron's treatise concerning the influence of foreign matter on the quality of steel. The principal properties of steel are those of tempering and annealing. The compounds of iron with silicon and boron have not these properties. They are more stable than the carbon compound, and this latter is capable of changing its properties; because the carbon in it either enters into combination or else is disengaged, which determines the condition of hardness or softness of steel, as in white and grey cast iron. When slowly cooled, steel splits up into a mixture of soft and carburetted iron; but, nevertheless, the carbon does not separate from the iron. If such steel be again heated, it forms a uniform compound, and hardens when rapidly cooled. If the same steel as before be taken and heated a long time, then, after being slowly cooled, it becomes much more soluble in acid, and leaves a residue of pure carbon. This shows that the combination between the carbon and iron in steel becomes destroyed when subjected to heat, and the steel becomes iron mixed with carbon. Such burnt steel cannot be tempered, but may be corrected by continued forging in a heated condition, which has the effect of redistributing the carbon equally throughout the whole mass. After the forging, if the iron is pure and the carbon has not been burnt out, steel is again formed, which may be tempered. If steel be repeatedly or strongly heated, it becomes burnt through and cannot be tempered or annealed; the carbon separates from the iron, and this is effected more easily if the steel contains other impurities which are capable of forming stable combinations with iron, such as silicon, sulphur, or phosphorus. If there be much silicon, it occupies the place of the carbon, and then continued forging will not induce the carbon once separated to re-enter into combination. Such steel is easily burnt through and cannot be corrected; when burnt through, it is hard and cannot be annealed—this is tough steel, an inferior kind. Iron which contains sulphur and phosphorus cements badly, combines but little with carbon, and steel of this kind is brittle, both hot and cold. Iron in combination with the above-mentioned substances cannot be annealed by slow cooling, showing that these compounds are more stable than those of carbon and iron, and therefore they prevent the formation of the latter. Such metals as tin and zinc combine with iron, but not with carbon, and form a brittle mass which cannot be annealed and is deleterious to steel. Manganese and tungsten, on the contrary, are capable of combining with charcoal; they do not hinder the formation of steel, but even remove the injurious effects of other admixtures (by transforming these admixed substances into new compounds and slags), and are therefore ranked with the substances which act beneficially on steel; but, nevertheless, the best steel, which is capable of renewing most often its primitive qualities after burning or hot forging, is the purest. The addition of Ni, Cr, W, and certain other metals to steel renders it very suitable for certain special purposes, and is therefore frequently made use of.

It is worthy of attention that steel, besides temper, possesses many variable properties, a review of which may be made in the classification of the sorts of steel (1878, Cockerell). (1) Very mild steel contains from 0·05 to 0·20 p.c. of carbon, breaks with a weight of 40 to 50 kilos per square millimetre, and has an extension of 20 to 30 p.c.; it may be welded, like wrought iron, but cannot be tempered; is used in sheets for boilers, armour plate and bridges, nails, rivets, &c., as a substitute for wrought iron; (2) mild steel, from 0·20 to 0·35 p.c. of carbon, resistance to tension 50 to 60 kilos, extension 15 to 20 p.c., not easily welded, and tempers badly, used for axles, rails, and railway tyres, for cannons and guns, and for parts of machines destined to resist bending and torsion; (3) hard steel, carbon 0·35 to 0·50 p.c., breaking weight 60 to 70 kilos per square millimetre, extension 10 to 15 p.c., cannot be welded, takes a temper; used for rails, all kinds of springs, swords, parts of machinery in motion subjected to friction, spindles of looms, hammers, spades, hoes, &c.; (4) very hard steel, carbon 0·5 to 0·65 p.c., tensile breaking weight 70 to 80 kilos, extension 5 to 10 p.c., does not weld, but tempers easily; used for small springs, saws, files, knives and similar instruments.

The properties of ordinary wrought iron are well known. The best iron is the most tenacious—that is to say, that which does not break up when struck with the hammer or bent, and yet at the same time is sufficiently hard. There is, however, a distinction between hard and soft iron. Generally the softest iron is the most tenacious, and can best be welded, drawn into wire, sheets, &c. Hard, especially tough, iron is often characterised by its breaking when bent, and is therefore very difficult to work, and objects made from it are less serviceable in many respects. Soft iron is most adapted for making wire and sheet iron and such small objects as nails. Soft iron is characterised by its attaining a fibrous fracture after forging, whilst tough iron preserves its granular structure after this operation. Certain sorts of iron, although fairly soft at the ordinary temperature, become brittle when heated and are difficult to weld. These sorts are less suitable for being worked up into small objects. The variety of the properties of iron depends on the impurities which it contains. In general, the iron used in the arts still contains carbon and always a certain quantity of silicon, manganese, sulphur, phosphorus, &c. A variety in the proportion of these component parts changes the quality of the iron. In addition to this the change which soft wrought iron, having a fibrous structure, undergoes when subjected to repeated blows and vibrations is considerable; it then becomes granular and brittle. This to a certain degree explains the want of stability of some iron objects—such as truck axles, which must be renewed after a certain term of service, otherwise they become brittle. It is evident that there are innumerable intermediate transitions from wrought iron to steel and cast iron.

At the present day the greater part of the cast iron manufactured is converted into steel, generally cast steel (Bessemer's and Martin's). I may add the Urals, Donetz district, and other parts of Russia offer the greatest advantages for the development of an iron industry, because these localities not only contain vast supplies of excellent iron ore, but also coal, which is necessary for smelting it.

[11] According to information supplied by A. T. Skinder's experiments at the Oboukoff Steel Works, 140 volumes of liquid molten steel give 128 volumes of solid metal. By means of a galvanic current of great intensity and dense charcoal as one electrode, and iron as the other, Bernadoss welded iron and fused holes through sheet iron. Soft wrought iron, like steel and soft malleable cast iron, may be melted in Siemens' regenerative furnaces, and in furnaces heated with naphtha.

[11 bis] Gore (1869), Tait, Barret, Tchernoff, Osmond, and others observed that at a temperature approaching 600°—that is, between dark and bright red heat—all kinds of wrought iron undergo a peculiar change called recalescence, i.e. a spontaneous rise of temperature. If iron be considerably heated and allowed to cool, it may be observed that at this temperature the cooling stops—that is, latent heat is disengaged, corresponding with a change in condition. The specific heat, electrical conductivity, magnetic, and other properties then also change. In tempering, the temperature of recalescence must not be reached, and so also in annealing, &c. It is evident that a change of the internal condition is here encountered, exactly similar to the transition from a solid to a liquid, although there is no evident physical change. It is probable that attentive study would lead to the discovery of a similar change in other substances.

[12] The particles of steel are linked together or connected more closely than those of the other metals; this is shown by the fact that it only breaks with a tensile strain of 50–80 kilos per sq. mm., whilst wrought iron only withstands about 30 kilos, cast iron 10, copper 35, silver 23, platinum 30, wood 8. The elasticity of iron, steel, and other metals is expressed by the so-called coefficient of elasticity. Let a rod be taken whose length is L; if a weight, P, be hung from the extremity of it, it will lengthen to l. The less it lengthens under other equal conditions, the more elastic the material, if it resumes its original length when the weight is removed. It has been shown by experiment that the increase in length l, due to elasticity, is directly proportional to the length L and the weight P, and inversely proportional to the section, but changes with the material. The coefficient of elasticity expresses that weight (in kilos per sq. mm.) under which a rod having a square section taken as 1 (we take 1 sq. mm.) acquires double the length by tension. Naturally in practice materials do not withstand such a lengthening, under a certain weight they attain a limit of elasticity, i.e. they stretch permanently (undergo deformation). Neglecting fractions (as the elasticity of metals varies not only with the temperature, but also with forging, purity, &c.), the coefficient of elasticity of steel and iron is 20,000, copper and brass 10,000, silver 7,000, glass 6,000, lead 2,000, and wood 1,200.

[13] Paraffin is one of the best preservatives for iron against oxidation in the air. I found this by experiments about 1860, and immediately published the fact. This method is now very generally applied.

[14] See Chapter XVIII., Note 34 bis. Based on the rapid oxidation of iron and its increase in volume in the presence of water and salts of ammonium, a packing is used for water mains and steam pipes which is tightly hammered into the socket joints. This packing consists of a mixture of iron filings and a small quantity of sal-ammoniac (and sulphur) moistened with water; after a certain lapse of time, especially after the pipes have been used, this mass swells to such an extent that it hermetically seals the joints of the pipes.

[15] Here, however, a ferric salt may also be formed (when all the iron has dissolved and the cupric salt is still in excess), because the cupric salts are reduced by ferrous salts. Cast iron is also dissolved.

[16] Powdery reduced iron is passive with regard to nitric acid of a specific gravity of 1·37, but when heated the acid acts on it. This passiveness disappears in the magnetic field. Saint-Edme attributes the passiveness of iron (and nickel) to the formation of nitride of iron on the surface of the metal, because he observed that when heated in dry hydrogen ammonia is evolved by passive iron.

Remsen observed that if a strip of iron be immersed in acid and placed in the magnetic field, it is principally dissolved at its middle part—that is, the acid acts more feebly at the poles. According to Étard (1891) strong nitric acid dissolves iron in making it passive, although the action is a very slow one.

[17] Iron vitriol or green vitriol, sulphate of iron or ferrous sulphate, generally crystallises from solutions, like magnesium sulphate, with seven molecules of water, FeSO4,7H2O. This salt is not only formed by the action of iron on sulphuric acid, but also by the action of moisture and air on iron pyrites, especially when previously roasted (FeS2 + O2 = FeS + SO2), and in this condition it easily absorbs the oxygen of damp air (FeS + O4 = FeSO4). Green vitriol is obtained in many processes as a by-product. Ferrous sulphate, like all the ferrous salts, has a pale greenish colour hardly perceptible in solution. If it be desired to preserve it without change—that is, so as not to contain ferric compounds—it is necessary to keep it hermetically sealed. This is best done by expelling the air by means of sulphurous anhydride or ether; sulphurous anhydride, SO2, removes oxygen from ferric compounds, which might be formed, and is itself changed into sulphuric acid, and hence the oxidation of the ferrous compound does not take place in its presence. Unless these precautions are taken, green vitriol turns brown, partly changing into the ferric salt. When turned brown, it is not completely soluble in water, because during its oxidation a certain amount of free insoluble ferric oxide is formed: 6FeSO4 + O3 = 2Fe2(SO4)3 + Fe2O3. In order to cleanse such mixed green vitriol from the oxide, it is necessary to add some sulphuric acid and iron and boil the mixture; the ferric salt is then transformed into the ferrous state: Fe2(SO4)3 + Fe = 3FeSO4.

Green vitriol is used for the manufacture of Nordhausen sulphuric acid (Chapter XX.), for preparing ferric oxide, in many dye works (for preparing the indigo vats and reducing blue indigo to white), and in many other processes; it is also a very good disinfectant, and is the cheapest salt from which other compounds of iron may be obtained.

The other ferrous salts (excepting the yellow prussiate, which will be mentioned later) are but little used, and it is therefore unnecessary to dwell upon them. We will only mention ferrous chloride, which, in the crystalline state, has the composition FeCl2,4H2O. It is easily prepared; for instance, by the action of hydrochloric acid on iron, and in the anhydrous state by the action of hydrochloric acid gas on metallic iron at a red heat. The anhydrous ferrous chloride then volatilises in the form of colourless cubic crystals. Ferrous oxalate (or the double potassium salt) acts as a powerful reducing agent, and is frequently employed in photography (as a developer).

[18] Ferrous sulphate, like magnesium sulphate, easily forms double salts—for instance, (NH4)2SO4,FeSO4,6H2O. This salt does not oxidise in air so readily as green vitriol, and is therefore used for standardising KMnO4.

[19] The transformation of ferrous oxide into ferric oxide is not completely effected in air, as then only a part of the suboxide is converted into ferric oxide. Under these circumstances the so-called magnetic oxide of iron is generally produced, which contains atomic quantities of the suboxide and oxide—namely, FeO,Fe2O3 = Fe3O4. This substance, as already mentioned, is found in nature and in iron scale. It is also formed when most ferrous and ferric salts are heated in air; thus, for instance, when ferrous carbonate, FeCO3 (native or the precipitate given by soda in a solution of FeX2), is heated it loses the elements of carbonic anhydride, and magnetic oxide remains. This oxide of iron is attracted by the magnet, and is on this account called magnetic oxide, although it does not always show magnetic properties. If magnetic oxide be dissolved in any acid—for instance, hydrochloric—which does not act as an oxidising agent, a ferrous salt is first formed and ferric oxide remains, which is also capable of passing into solution. The best way of preparing the hydrate of the magnetic oxide is by decomposing a mixture of ferrous and ferric salts with ammonia; it is, however, indispensable to pour this mixture into the ammonia, and not vice versÂ, as in that case the ferrous oxide would at first be precipitated alone, and then the ferric oxide. The compound thus formed has a bright green colour, and when dried forms a black powder. Other combinations of ferrous with ferric oxide are known, as are also compounds of ferric oxide with other bases. Thus, for instance, compounds are known containing 4 molecules of ferrous oxide to 1 of ferric oxide, and also 6 of ferrous to 1 of ferric oxide. These are also magnetic, and are formed by heating iron in air. The magnesium compound MgO,Fe2O3 is prepared by passing gaseous hydrochloric acid over a heated mixture of magnesia and ferric oxide. Crystalline magnesium oxide is then formed, and black, shiny, octahedral crystals of the above-mentioned composition. This compound is analogous to the aluminates—for instance, to spinel. Bernheim (1888) and Rousseau (1891) obtained many similar compounds of ferric oxide, and their composition apparently corresponds to the hydrates (Note 22) known for the oxide.

[20] Copper and cuprous salts also reduce ferric oxide to ferrous oxide, and are themselves turned into cupric salts. The essence of the reactions is expressed by the following equations: Fe2O3 + Cu2O = 2FeO + 2CuO; Fe2O3 + Cu = 2FeO + CuO. This fact is made use of in analysing copper compounds, the quantity of copper being ascertained by the amount of ferrous salt obtained. An excess of ferric salt is required to complete the reaction. Here we have an example of reverse reaction; the ferrous oxide or its salt in the presence of alkali transforms the cupric oxide into cuprous oxide and metallic copper, as observed by Lovel, Knopp, and others.

[21] We will here mention the reactions by means of which it may be ascertained whether the ferrous compound has been entirely converted into a ferric compound or vice versÂ. There are two substances which are best employed for this purpose: potassium ferricyanide, FeK3C6N6, and potassium thiocyanate, KCNS. The first salt gives with ferrous salts a blue precipitate of an insoluble salt, having a composition Fe5C12N12; but with ferric salts it does not form any precipitate, and only gives a brown colour, and therefore when transforming a ferrous salt into a ferric salt, the completion of the transformation may be detected by taking a drop of the liquid on paper or on a porcelain plate and adding a drop of the ferricyanide solution. If a blue precipitate be formed, then part of the ferrous salt still remains; if there is none, the transformation is complete. The thiocyanate does not give any marked coloration with ferrous salts; but with ferric salts in the most diluted state it forms a bright red soluble compound, and therefore when transforming a ferric salt into a ferrous salt we must proceed as before, testing a drop of the solution with thiocyanate, when the absence of a red colour will prove the total transformation of the ferric salt into the ferrous state, and if a red colour is apparent it shows that the transformation is not yet complete.

[22] The two ferric hydroxides are not only characterised by the above-mentioned properties, but also by the fact that the first hydroxide forms immediately with potassium ferrocyanide, K4FeC6N6, a blue colour depending on the formation of Prussian blue, whilst the second hydroxide does not give any reaction whatever with this salt. The first hydroxide is entirely soluble in nitric, hydrochloric, and all other acids; whilst the second sometimes (not always) forms a brick-coloured liquid, which appears turbid and does not give the reactions peculiar to the ferric salts (PÉan de Saint-Gilles, Scheurer-Kestner). In addition to this, when the smallest quantity of an alkaline salt is added to this liquid, ferric oxide is precipitated. Thus a colloidal solution is formed (hydrosol), which is exactly similar to silica hydrosol (Chapter XVII.), according to which example the hydrosol of ferric oxide may be obtained.

If ordinary ferric hydroxide be dissolved in acetic acid, a solution of the colour of red wine is obtained, which has all the reactions characteristic of ferric salts. But if this solution (formed in the cold) be heated to the boiling-point, its colour is very rapidly intensified, a smell of acetic acid becomes apparent, and the solution then contains a new variety of ferric oxide. If the boiling of the solution be continued, acetic acid is evolved, and the modified ferric oxide is precipitated. If the evaporation of the acetic acid be prevented (in a closed or sealed vessel), and the liquid be heated for some time, the whole of the ferric hydroxide then passes into the insoluble form, and if some alkaline salt be added (to the hydrosol formed), the whole of the ferric oxide is then precipitated in its insoluble form. This method may be applied for separating ferric oxide from solutions of its salts.

All phenomena observed respecting ferric oxide (colloidal properties, various forms, formation of double basic salts) demonstrate that this substance, like silica, alumina, lead hydroxide, &c., is polymerised, that the composition is represented by (Fe2O3)n.

[23] The ferric compound which is most used in practice (for instance, in medicine, for cauterising, stopping bleeding, &c.—Oleum Martis) is ferric chloride, Fe2Cl6, easily obtained by dissolving the ordinary hydrated oxide of iron in hydrochloric acid. It is obtained in the anhydrous state by the action of chlorine on heated iron. The experiment is carried on in a porcelain tube, and a solid volatile substance is then formed in the shape of brilliant violet scales which very readily absorb moisture from the air, and when heated with water decompose into crystalline ferric oxide and hydrochloric acid: Fe2Cl6 + 3H2O = 6HCl + Fe2O3. Ferric chloride is so volatile that the density of its vapour may be determined. At 440° it is equal to 164·0 referred to hydrogen; the formula Fe2Cl6 corresponds with a density of 162·5. An aqueous solution of this salt has a brown colour. On evaporating and cooling this solution, crystals separate containing 6 or 12 molecules of H2O. Ferric chloride is not only soluble in water, but also in alcohol (similarly to magnesium chloride, &c.) and in ether. If the latter solutions are exposed to the rays of the sun they become colourless, and deposit ferrous chloride, FeCl2, chlorine being disengaged. After a certain lapse of time, the aqueous solutions of ferric chloride decompose with precipitation of a basic salt, thus demonstrating the instability of ferric chloride, like the other salts of ferric oxide (Note 22). This salt is much more stable in the form of double salts, like all the ferric salts and also the salts of many other feeble bases. Potassium or ammonium chloride forms with it very beautiful red crystals of a double salt, having the composition Fe2Cl6,4KCl,2H2O. When a solution of this salt is evaporated it decomposes, with separation of potassium chloride.

B. Roozeboom (1892) studied in detail (as for CaCl2, Chapter XIV., Note 50) the separation of different hydrates from saturated solutions of Fe2Cl6 at various concentrations and temperatures; he found that there are 4 crystallohydrates with 12, 7, 5, and 4 molecules of water. An orange yellow only slightly hygroscopic hydrate, Fe2Cl6,12H2O, is most easily and usually obtained, which melts at 37°; its solubility at different temperatures is represented by the curve BCD in the accompanying figure, where the point B corresponds to the formation, at -55°, of a cryohydrate containing about Fe2Cl6 + 36H2O, the point C corresponds to the melting-point (+37°) of the hydrate Fe2Cl6,12H2O, and the curve CD to the fall in the temperature of crystallisation with an increase in the amount of salt, or decrease in the amount of water (in the figure the temperatures are taken along the axis of abscissÆ, and the amount of n in the formula nFe2Cl6 + 100H2O along the axis of ordinates). When anhydrous Fe2Cl6 is added to the above hydrate (12H2O), or some of the water is evaporated from the latter, very hygroscopic crystals of Fe2Cl6,5H2O (Fritsche) are formed; they melt at 56°, their solubility is expressed by the curve HJ, which also presents a small branch at the end J. This again gives the fall in the temperature of crystallisation with an increase in the amount of Fe2Cl6. Besides these curves and the solubility of the anhydrous salt expressed by the line KL (up to 100°, beyond which chlorine is liberated), Roozeboom also gives the two curves, EFG and JK, corresponding to the crystallohydrates, Fe2Cl6,7H2O (melts at +32°·5, that is lower than any of the others) and Fe2Cl6,4H2O (melts at 73°·5), which he discovered by a systematic research on the solutions of ferric chloride. The curve AB represents the separation of ice from dilute solutions of the salt.

see caption

Fig. 95.—Diagram of the solubility of Fe2Cl6.

see caption

Fig. 96.—Diagram of the formation, at 15°, of the double salt Fe2Cl64NH4Cl2H2O or Fe(NH4)2Cl5H2O. (After Roozeboom.)

The researches of the same Dutch chemist upon the conditions of the formation of crystals from the double salt (NH4Cl)4Fe2Cl6,2H2O are even more perfect. This salt was obtained in 1839 by Fritsche, and is easily formed from a strong solution of Fe2Cl6 by adding sal-ammoniac, when it separates in crimson rhombic crystals, which, after dissolving in water, only deposit again on evaporation, together with the sal-ammoniac.

Roozeboom (1892) found that when the solution contains b molecules of Fe2Cl6, and a molecules of NH4Cl, per 100 molecules H2O, then at 15° one of the following separations takes place: (1) crystals, Fe2Cl6,12H2O, when a varies between 0 and 11, and b between 4·65 and 4·8, or (2) a mixture of these crystals and the double salt, when a = 1·36, and b = 4·47, or (3) the double salt, Fe2Cl6,4NH4Cl,2H2O, when a varies between 2 and 11·8, and b between 3·1 and 4·56, or (4) a mixture of sal-ammoniac with the iron salt (it crystallises in separate cubes, Retgers, Lehmann), when a varies between 7·7 and 10·9, and b is less than 3·38, or (5) sal-ammoniac, when a = 11·88. And as in the double salt, a : b :: 4 : 1 it is evident that the double salt only separates out when the ratio a : b is less than 4 : 1 (i.e. when Fe2Cl6 predominates). The above is seen more clearly in the accompanying figure, where a, or the number of molecules of NH4Cl per 100H2O, is taken along the axis of abscissÆ, and b, or the number of molecules of Fe2Cl6, along the ordinates. The curves ABCD correspond to saturation and present an iso-therm of 15°. The portion AB corresponds to the separation of chloride of iron (the ascending nature of this curve shows that the solubility of Fe2Cl6 is increased by the presence of NH4Cl, while that of NH4Cl decreases in the presence of Fe2Cl6), the portion BC to the double salt, and the portion CD to a mixture of sal-ammoniac and ferric chloride, while the straight line OF corresponds to the ratio Fe2Cl6,4NH4Cl, or a : b :: 4 : 1. The portion CE shows that more double salt may be introduced into the solution without decomposition, but then the solution deposits a mixture of sal-ammoniac and ferric chloride (see Chapter XXIV. Note 9bis). If there were more such well-investigated cases of solutions, our knowledge of double salts, solutions, the influence of water, equilibria, isomorphous mixtures, and such-like provinces of chemical relations might be considerably advanced.

[24] The normal ferric salts are decomposed by heat and even by water, forming basic salts, which may be prepared in various ways. Generally ferric hydroxide is dissolved in solutions of ferric nitrate; if it contains a double quantity of iron the basic salt is formed which contains Fe2O3 (in the form of hydroxide) + 2Fe2(NO3)6 = 3Fe2O(NO3)4, a salt of the type Fe2OX4. Probably water enters into its composition. With considerable quantities of ferric oxide, insoluble basic salts are obtained containing various amounts of ferric hydroxide. Thus when a solution of the above-mentioned basic acid is boiled, a precipitate is formed containing 4(Fe2O3)8,2(N2O5),3H2O, which probably contains 2Fe2O2(NO3)2 + 2Fe2O3,3H2O. If a solution of basic nitrate be sealed in a tube and then immersed in boiling water, the colour of the solution changes just in the same way as if a solution of ferric acetate had been employed (Note 22). The solution obtained smells strongly of nitric acid, and on adding a drop of sulphuric or hydrochloric acid the insoluble variety of hydrated ferric oxide is precipitated.

Normal ferric orthophosphate is soluble in sulphuric, hydrochloric, and nitric acids, but insoluble in others, such as, for instance, acetic acid. The composition of this salt in the anhydrous state is FePO4, because in orthophosphoric acid there are three atoms of hydrogen, and iron, in the ferric state, replaces the three atoms of hydrogen. This salt is obtained from ferric acetate, which, with disodium phosphate, forms a white precipitate of FePO4, containing water. If a solution of ferric chloride (yellowish-red colour) be mixed with a solution of sodium acetate in excess, the liquid assumes an intense brown colour which demonstrates the formation of a certain quantity of ferric acetate; then the disodium phosphate directly forms a white gelatinous precipitate of ferric phosphate. By this means the whole of the iron may be precipitated, and the liquid which was brown then becomes colourless. If this normal salt be dissolved in orthophosphoric acid, the crystalline acid salt FeH3(PO4)2 is formed. If there be an excess of ferric oxide in the solution, the precipitate will consist of the basic salt. If ferric phosphate be dissolved in hydrochloric acid, and ammonia be added, a salt is precipitated on heating which, after continued washing in water and heating (to remove the water), has the composition Fe4P2O11—that is, 2Fe2O3,P2O5. In an aqueous condition this salt may be considered as ferric hydroxide, Fe2(OH)6, in which (OH)3 is replaced by the equivalent group PO4. Whenever ammonia is added to a solution containing an excess of ferric salt and a certain amount of phosphoric acid, a precipitate is formed containing the whole of the phosphoric acid in the mass of the ferric oxide.

Ferric oxide is characterised as a feeble base, and also by the fact of its forming double salts—for instance, potassium iron alum, which has a composition Fe2(SO4)3,K2SO4,24H2O or FeK(SO4)2,12H2O. It is obtained in the form of almost colourless or light rose-coloured large octahedra of the regular system by simply mixing solutions of potassium sulphate and the ferric sulphate obtained by dissolving ferric oxide in sulphuric acid.

[25] It would seem that all normal ferric salts are colourless, and that the brown colour which is peculiar to the solutions is really due to basic ferric salts. A remarkable example of the apparent change of colour of salts is represented by the ferrous and ferric oxalates. The former in a dry state has a yellow colour, although as a rule the ferrous salts are green, and the latter is colourless or pale green. When the normal ferric salt is dissolved in water it is, like many salts, probably decomposed by the water into acid and basic salts, and the latter communicates a brown colour to the solution. Iron alum is almost colourless, is easily decomposed by water, and is the best proof of our assertion. The study of the phenomena peculiar to ferric nitrate might, in my opinion, give a very useful addition to our knowledge of the aqueous solutions of salts in general.

[25 bis] The reaction FeX3 + KI = FeX2 + KX + I proceeds comparatively slowly in solutions, is not complete (depends upon the mass), and is reversible. In this connection we may cite the following data from Seubert and Rohrer's (1894) comprehensive researches. The investigations were conducted with solutions containing 1/10 gram—equivalent weights of Fe2(SO4)3 (i.e. containing 20 grams of salt per litre), and a corresponding solution of KI; the amount of iodine liberated being determined (after the addition of starch) by a solution (also 1/10 normal) of Na2S2O3 (see Chapter XX., Note 42). The progress of the reaction was expressed by the amount of liberated iodine in percentages of the theoretical amount. For instance, the following amount of iodide of potassium was decomposed when Fe2(SO4)3 + 2nKI was taken:

n = 1 2 3 6 10 20
After 15' 11·4 26·3 40·6 73·5 91·6 96·0
30' 14·0 35·8 47·8 78·5 94·3 97·4
1 hour 19·0 42·7 56·0 84·0 95·7 97·6
10 32·6 56·0 75·7 93·2 96·5 97·6
48 39·4 67·7 82·6 93·4 96·6 97·6

Similar results were obtained for FeCl3, but then the amount of iodine liberated was somewhat greater. Similar results were also obtained by increasing the mass of FeX3 per KI, and by replacing it by HI (see Chapter XXI., Note 26).

[26] If chlorine be passed through a strong solution of potassium hydroxide in which hydrated ferric oxide is suspended, the turbid liquid acquires a dark pomegranate-red colour and contains potassium ferrate: 10KHO + Fe2O3 + 3Cl2 = 2K2FeO4 + 6KCl + 5H2O. The chlorine must not be in excess, otherwise the salt is again decomposed, although the mode of decomposition is unknown; however, ferric chloride and potassium chlorate are probably formed. Another way in which the above-described salt is formed is also remarkable; a galvanic current (from 6 Grove elements) is passed through cast-iron and platinum electrodes into a strong solution of potassium hydroxide. The cast-iron electrode is connected with the positive pole, and the platinum electrode is surrounded by a porous earthenware cylinder. Oxygen would be evolved at the cast-iron electrode, but it is used up in oxidation, and a dark solution of potassium ferrate is therefore formed about it. It is remarkable that the cast iron cannot be replaced by wrought iron.

[26 bis] When Mond and his assistants obtained the remarkable volatile compound Ni(CO)4 (described later, Chapter XXII.), it was shown subsequently by Mond and Quincke (1891), and also by Berthelot, that iron, under certain conditions, in a stream of carbonic oxide, also volatilises and forms a compound like that given by nickel. Roscoe and Scudder then showed that when water gas is passed through and kept under pressure (8 atmospheres) in iron vessels a portion of the iron volatilises from the sides of the vessel, and that when the gas is burnt it deposits a certain amount of oxides of iron (the same result is obtained with ordinary coal gas which contains a small amount of CO). To obtain the volatile compound of iron with carbonic oxide, Mond prepared a finely divided iron by heating the oxalate in a stream of hydrogen, and after cooling it to 80°-45° he passed CO over the powder. The iron then formed (although very slowly) a volatile compound containing Fe(CO)5 (as though it answered to a very high type, FeX10), which when cooled condenses into a liquid (slightly coloured, probably owing to incipient decomposition), sp. gr. 1·47, which solidifies at -21°, boils at about 103°, and has a vapour density (about 6·5 with respect to air) corresponding to the above formula; it decomposes at 180°. Water and dilute acids do not act upon it, but it decomposes under the action of light and forms a hard, non-volatile crystalline yellow compound Fe2(CO)7 which decomposes at 80° and again forms Fe(CO)5.

[26 tri] When the molecular Fe2Cl6 is produced instead of FeCl3 this complication of the type also occurs.

[27] Some light may be thrown upon the faculty of Fe of forming various compounds with CN, by the fact that Fe not only combines with carbon but also with nitrogen. Nitride of iron Fe2N was obtained by Fowler by heating finely powdered iron in a stream of NH3 at the temperature of melting lead.

[27 bis] The sulphur of the animal refuse here forms the compound FeKS2, which by the action of potassium cyanide yields potassium sulphide, thiocyanate, and ferrocyanide.

[28] Potassium ferrocyanide may also be obtained from Prussian blue by boiling with a solution of potassium hydroxide, and from the ferricyanide by the action of alkalis and reducing substances (because the red prussiate is a product of oxidation produced by the action of chlorine: a ferric salt is reduced to a ferrous salt), &c. In many works (especially in Germany and France) yellow prussiate is prepared from the mass, containing oxide of iron, and employed for purifying coal gas (Vol. I., p. 361), which generally contains cyanogen compounds. About 2 p.c. of the nitrogen contained in coal is converted into cyanogen, which forms Prussian blue and thiocyanates in the mass used for purifying the gas. On evaporation the solution yields large yellow crystals containing 3 molecules of water, which is easily expelled by heating above 100°. 100 parts of water at the ordinary temperature are capable of dissolving 25 parts of this salt; its sp. gr. is 1·83. When ignited it forms potassium cyanide and iron carbide, FeC2 (Chapter XIII., Note 12). Oxidising substances change it into potassium ferricyanide. With strong sulphuric acid it gives carbonic oxide, and with dilute sulphuric acid, when heated, prussic acid is evolved according to the equation: 2K4FeC6N6 + 3H2SO4 = K2Fe2C6N6 + 3K2SO4 + 6HCN; hence in the yellow prussiate K2 replaces Fe.

[29] Skraup obtained this salt both from potassium ferrocyanide with ferric chloride and from ferricyanide with ferrous chloride, which evidently shows that it contains iron in both the ferric and ferrous states. With ferrous chloride it forms Prussian blue, and with ferric chloride Turnbull's blue.

Prussian blue was discovered in the beginning of the last century by a Berlin manufacturer, Diesbach. It was then prepared, as it sometimes is also at present, directly from potassium cyanide obtained by heating animal charcoal with potassium carbonate. The mass thus obtained is dissolved in water, alum is added to the solution in order to saturate the free alkali, and then a solution of green vitriol is added which has previously been sufficiently exposed to the air to contain both ferric and ferrous salts. If the solution of potassium cyanide be mixed with a solution containing both salts, Prussian blue will be formed, because it is a compound of ferrous cyanide, FeC2N2, and ferric cyanide, Fe2C6N6. A ferric salt with potassium ferrocyanide forms a blue colour, because ferrous cyanide is obtained from the first salt and ferric cyanide from the second. During the preparation of this compound alkali must be avoided, as otherwise the precipitate would contain oxides of iron. Prussian blue has not a crystalline structure; it forms a blue mass with a copper-red metallic lustre. Both acids and alkalis act on it. The action is at first confined to the ferric salt it contains. Thus alkalis form ferric oxide and ferrocyanide in solution: 2Fe2C6N6,3FeC2N2 + 12KHO = 2(Fe2O3,3H2O) + 3K4FeC6N6. Various ferrocyanides may thus be prepared. Prussian blue is soluble in an aqueous solution of oxalic acid, forming blue ink. In air, when exposed to the action of light, it fades; but in the dark again absorbs oxygen and becomes blue, which fact is also sometimes noticed in blue cloth. An excess of potassium ferrocyanide renders Prussian blue soluble in water, although insoluble in various saline solutions—that is, it converts it into the soluble variety. Strong hydrochloric acid also dissolves Prussian blue.

[30] An excess of chlorine must not be employed in preparing this compound, otherwise the reaction goes further. It is easy to find out when the action of the chlorine on potassium ferrocyanide must cease; it is only necessary to take a sample of the liquid and add a solution of a ferric salt to it. If a precipitate of Prussian blue is formed, more chlorine must be added, as there is still some undecomposed ferrocyanide, for the ferricyanide does not give a precipitate with ferric salts. Potassium ferricyanide, like the ferrocyanide, easily exchanges its potassium for hydrogen and various metals by double decomposition. With the salts of tin, silver, and mercury it forms yellow precipitates, and with those of uranium, nickel, cobalt, copper, and bismuth brown precipitates. The lead salt under the action of sulphuretted hydrogen forms lead sulphide and a hydrogen salt or acid, H3FeC6N6, corresponding with potassium ferricyanide, which is soluble, crystallises in red needles, and resembles hydroferrocyanic acid, H4FeC6N6. Under the action of reducing agents—for instance, sulphuretted hydrogen, copper—potassium ferricyanide is changed into ferrocyanide, especially in the presence of alkalis, and thus forms a rather energetic oxidising agent—capable, for instance, of changing manganous oxide into dioxide, bleaching tissues, &c.

[31] It is important to mention a series of readily crystallisable salts formed by the action of nitric acid on potassium and other ferrocyanides and ferricyanides. These salt contain the elements of nitric oxide, and are therefore called nitro-(nitroso) ferricyanides (nitroprussides). Generally a crystalline sodium salt is obtained, Na2FeC5N6O,2H2O. In its composition this salt differs from the red sodium salt, Na3FeC6N6, by the fact that in it one molecule of sodium cyanide, NaCN, is replaced by nitric oxide, NO. In order to prepare it, potassium ferrocyanide in powder is mixed with five-sevenths of its weight of nitric acid diluted with an equal volume of water. The mixture is at first left at the ordinary temperature, and then heated on a water-bath. Here ferricyanide is first of all formed (as shown by the liquid giving a precipitate with ferrous chloride), which then disappears (no precipitate with ferrous chloride), and forms a green precipitate. The liquid, when cooled, deposits crystals of nitre. The liquid is then strained off and mixed with sodium carbonate, boiled, filtered, and evaporated; sodium nitrate and the salt described are deposited in crystals. It separates in prisms of a red colour. Alkalis and salts of the alkaline earths do not give precipitates: they are soluble, but the salts of iron, zinc, copper, and silver form precipitates where sodium is exchanged with these metals. It is remarkable that the sulphides of the alkali metals give with this salt an intense bright purple coloration. This series of compounds was discovered by Gmelin and studied by Playfair and others (1849).

This series to a certain extent resembles the nitro-sulphide series described by Roussin. Here the primary compound consists of black crystals, which are obtained as follows:—Solutions of potassium hydrosulphide and nitrate are mixed, and the mixture is agitated whilst ferric chloride is added, then boiled and filtered; on cooling, black crystals are deposited, having the composition Fe6S3(NO)10,H2O (Rosenberg), or, according to Demel, FeNO2,NH2S. They have a slightly metallic lustre, and are soluble in water, alcohol, and ether. They absorb the latter as easily as calcium chloride absorbs water. In the presence of alkalis these crystals remain unchanged, but with acids they evolve nitric oxides. There are several compounds which are capable of interchanging, and correspond with Roussin's salt. Here we enter into the series of the nitrogen compounds which have been as yet but little investigated, and will most probably in time form most instructive material for studying the nature of that element. These series of compounds are as unlike the usual saline compounds of inorganic chemistry as are organic hydrocarbons. There is no necessity to describe these series in detail, because their connection with other compounds is not yet clear, and they have not yet any application.

[32] The residue from the roasting of cobalt ores is called zafflor, and is often met with in commerce. From this the purer compounds of cobalt may be prepared. The ores of nickel are also first roasted, and the oxides dissolved in acid, nickelous salts being then obtained.

The further treatment of cobalt and nickel ores is facilitated if the arsenic can be almost entirely removed, which may be effected by roasting the ore a second time with a small addition of nitre and sodium carbonate; the nitre combines with the arsenic, forming an arsenious salt, which may be extracted with water. The remaining mass is dissolved in hydrochloric acid, mixed with a small quantity of nitric acid. Copper, iron, manganese, nickel, cobalt, &c., pass into solution. By passing hydrogen sulphide through the solution, copper, bismuth, lead, and arsenic are deposited as metallic sulphides; but iron, cobalt, nickel, and manganese remain in solution. If an alkaline solution of bleaching powder be then added to the remaining solution, the whole of the manganese will first be deposited in the form of dioxide, then the cobalt as hydrated cobaltic oxide, and finally the nickel also. It is, however, impossible to rely on this method for effecting a complete separation, the more so since the higher oxides of the three above-mentioned metals have all a black colour; but, after a few trials, it will be easy to find how much bleaching powder is required to precipitate the manganese, and the amount which will precipitate all the cobalt. The manganese may also be separated from cobalt by precipitation from a mixture of the solutions of both metals (in the form of the ‘ous’ salts) with ammonium sulphide, and then treating the precipitate with acetic acid or dilute hydrochloric acid, in which manganese sulphide is easily soluble and cobalt sulphide almost insoluble. Further particulars relating to the separation of cobalt from nickel may be found in treatises on analytical chemistry. In practice it is usual to rely on the rough method of separation founded on the fact that nickel is more easily reduced and more difficult to oxidise than cobalt. The New Caledonian ore is smelted with CaSO4 and CaCO3 on coke, and a metallic regulus is obtained containing all the Ni, Fe, and S. This is roasted with SiO2, which converts all the iron into slag, whilst the Ni remains combined with the S; this residue on further roasting gives NiO, which is reduced by the carbon to metallic Ni. The Canadian ore (a pyrites containing 11 p.c. Ni) is frequently treated in America (after a preliminary dressing) by smelting it with Na2SO4 and charcoal; the resultant fusible Na2S then dissolves the CuS and FeS2, while the NiS is obtained in a bottom layer (Bartlett and Thomson's process) from which Ni is obtained in the manner described above.

For manufacturing purposes somewhat impure cobalt compounds are frequently used, which are converted into smalt. This is glass containing a certain amount of cobalt oxide; the glass acquires a bright blue colour from this addition, so that when powdered it may be used as a blue pigment; it is also unaltered at high temperatures, so that it used to take the place now occupied by Prussian blue, ultramarine, &c. At present smalt is almost exclusively used for colouring glass and china. To prepare smalt, ordinary impure cobalt ore (zaffre) is fused in a crucible with quartz and potassium carbonate. A fused mass of cobalt glass is thus formed, containing silica, cobalt oxide, and potassium oxide, and a metallic mass remains at the bottom of the crucible, containing almost all the other metals, arsenic, nickel, copper, silver, &c. This metallic mass is called speiss, and is used as nickel ore for the extraction of nickel. Smalt usually contains 70 p.c. of silica, 20 p.c. of potash and soda, and about 5 to 6 p.c. of cobaltous oxide; the remainder consisting of other metallic oxides.

[32 bis] All we know respecting the relations of Co and Ni to Fe and Cu confirms the fact that Co is more closely related to Fe and Ni to Cu; and as the atomic weight of Fe = 56 and of Cu = 63, then according to the principles of the periodic system it would be expected that the atomic weight of Co would be about 59–60, whilst that of Ni should be greater than that of Co but less than that of Cu, i.e. about 50·5–60·5. However, as yet the majority of the determinations of the atomic weights of Co and Ni give a different result and show that a lower atomic weight is obtained for Ni than for Co. Thus K. Winkler (1894) obtained (employing metals deposited electrolytically and determining the amount of iodine which combined with them) Ni = 58·72 and Co = 59·37 (if H = 1 and I = 126·53). In my opinion this should not be regarded as proving that the principles of the periodic system cannot be applied in this instance, nor as a reason for altering the position of these elements in the system (i.e. by placing Ni after Fe, and Co next to Cu), because in the first place the figures given by different chemists (for instance, Zimmermann, KrÜss, and others) are somewhat divergent, and in the second place the majority of the latest modes of determining the atomic weights of Co and Ni aim at finding what weights of these metals react with known weights of other elements without taking into account the faculty they have of absorbing hydrogen; since this faculty is more developed in Ni than in Co the hydrogen (occluded in Ni) should lower the atomic weight of Ni more than that of Co. On the whole, the question of the atomic weights of Co and Ni cannot yet be considered as decided, notwithstanding the numerous researches which have been made; still there can be no doubt that the atomic weights of these two metals are very nearly equal, and greater than that of Fe, but less than that of Cu. This question is of great interest, not only for completing our knowledge of these metals, but also for perfecting our knowledge of the periodic system of the elements.

[32 tri] For instance, the alkalis may be fused in nickel vessels as well as in silver, because they have no action upon either metal. Nickel, like silver, is not acted upon by dilute acids. Only nitric acid dissolves both metals well. Nickel is harder, and fuses at a higher temperature than silver. For castings, a small quantity of magnesium (0·001 part by weight) is added to nickel to render it more homogeneous (just as aluminium is added to steel). Nickel forms many valuable alloys. Steel containing 3 p.c. Ni is particularly valuable, its limit of elasticity is higher and its hardness is greater; it is used for armour plate and other large pieces. The alloys of nickel, especially with copper and zinc (melchior, see later), aluminium and silver, although used in certain cases, are now replaced by nickel-plated or nickel-deposited goods (deposited by electricity from a solution of the ammonium salts).

[33] The change of colour is dependent in all probability on the combination with water, or according to others on polymeric transformation. It enables a solution of cobalt chloride to be used as sympathetic ink. If something be written with cobalt chloride on white paper, it will be invisible on account of the feeble colour of the solution, and when dry nothing can be distinguished. If, however, the paper be heated before the fire, the rose-coloured salt will be changed into a less hydrous blue salt, and the writing will become quite visible, but fade away when cool.

The change of colour which takes place in solutions of CoCl2 under the influence not only of solution in water or alcohol, but also of a change of temperature, is a characteristic of all the halogen salts of cobalt. Crystalline iodide of cobalt, CoI26H2O, gives a dark red solution between -22° and +20°; above +20° the solution turns brown and passes from olive to green, from +35° to 320° the solution remains green. According to Étard the change of colour is due to the fact that at first the solution contains the hydrate CoI2H2O, and that above 35° it contains CoI24H2O. These hydrates can be crystallised from the solutions; the former at ordinary temperature and the latter on heating the solution. The intermediate olive colour of the solutions corresponds to the incipient decomposition of the hexahydrated salt and its passage into CoI24H2O. A solution of the hexahydrated chloride of cobalt, CoCl26H2O, is rose-coloured between -22° and +25°; but the colour changes starting from +25°, and passes through all the tints between red and blue right up to 50°; a true blue solution is only obtained at 55° and remains up to 300°. This true blue solution contains another hydrate, CoCl22H2O.

The dependence between the solubility of the iodide and chloride of cobalt and the temperature is expressed by two almost straight lines corresponding to the hexa- and di-hydrates; the passage of the one into the other hydrate being expressed by a curve. The same character of phenomena is seen also in the variation of the vapour tension of solutions of chloride of cobalt with the temperature. We have repeatedly seen that aqueous solutions (for instance, Chapter XXII., Note 23 for Fe2Cl6) deposit different crystallo-hydrates at different temperatures, and that the amount of water in the hydrate decreases as the temperature t rises, so that it is not surprising that CoCl22H2O (or according to Potilitzin CoCl2H2O) should separate out above 55° and CoCl26H2O at 25° and below. Nor is it exceptional that the colour of a salt varies according as it contains different amounts of H2O. But in this instance it is characteristic that the change of colour takes place in solution in the presence of an excess of water. This apparently shows that the actual solution may contain either CoCl26H2O or CoCl22H2O. And as we know that a solution may contain both metaphosphoric PHO3 and orthophosphoric acid H3PO4 = HPO3 + H2O, as well as certain other anhydrides, the question of the state of substances in solutions becomes still more complicated.

Nickel sulphate crystallises from neutral solutions at a temperature of from 15° to 20° in rhombic crystals containing 7H2O. Its form approaches very closely to that of the salts of zinc and magnesium. The planes of a vertical prism for magnesium salts are inclined at an angle of 90° 30', for zinc salts at an angle of 91° 7', and for nickel salts at an angle of 91° 10'. Such is also the form of the zinc and magnesium selenates and chromates. Cobalt sulphate containing 7 molecules of water is deposited in crystals of the monoclinic system, like the corresponding salts of iron and manganese. The angle of a vertical prism for the iron salt = 82° 20', for cobalt = 82° 22', and the inclination of the horizontal pinacoid to the vertical prism for the iron salt = 99° 2', and for the cobalt salt 99° 36'. All the isomorphous mixtures of the salts of magnesium, iron, cobalt, nickel and manganese have the same form if they contain 7 mol. H2O and iron or cobalt predominate, whilst if there is a preponderance of magnesium, zinc, or nickel, the crystals have a rhombic form like magnesium sulphate. Hence these sulphates are dimorphous, but for some the one form is more stable and for others the other. Brooke, Moss, Mitscherlich, Rammelsberg, and Marignac have explained these relations. Brooke and Mitscherlich also supposed that NiSO4,7H2O is not only capable of assuming these forms, but also that of the tetragonal system, because it is deposited in this form from acid, and especially from slightly-heated solutions (30° to 40°). But Marignac demonstrated that the tetragonal crystals do not contain 7, but 6, molecules of water, NiSO4,6H2O. He also observed that a solution evaporated at 50° to 70° deposits monoclinic crystals, but of a different form from ferrous sulphate, FeSO4,7H2O—namely, the angle of the prism is 71° 52', that of the pinacoid 95° 6'. This salt appears to be the same with 6 molecules of water as the tetragonal. Marignac also obtained magnesium and zinc salts with 6 molecules of water by evaporating their solutions at a higher temperature, and these salts were found to be isomorphous with the monoclinic nickel salt. In addition to this it must be observed that the rhombic crystals of nickel sulphate with 7H2O become turbid under the influence of heat and light, lose water, and change into the tetragonal salt. The monoclinic crystals in time also become turbid, and change their structure, so that the tetragonal form of this salt is the most stable. Let us also add that nickel sulphate in all its shapes forms very beautiful emerald green crystals, which, when heated to 230°, assume a dirty greenish-yellow hue and then contain one molecule of water.

Klobb (1891) and Langlot and Lenoir obtained anhydrous CoSO4 and NiSO4 by igniting the hydrated salt with (NH4)2SO4 until the ammonium salt had completely volatilised and decomposed.

We may add that when equivalent aqueous solutions of NiX2 (green) and CoX2 (red) are mixed together they give an almost colourless (grey) solution, in which the green and red colour of the component parts disappears owing to the combination of the complementary colours.

A double salt NiKF3 is obtained by heating NiCl2 with KFHF in a platinum crucible; KCoF3 is formed in a similar manner. The nickel salt occurs in fine green plates, easily soluble in water but scarcely soluble in ethyl and methyl alcohol. They decompose into green oxide of nickel and potassium fluoride when heated in a current of air. The analogous salt of cobalt crystallises in crimson flakes.

If instead of potassium fluoride, CoCl2 or NiCl2 be fused with ammonium fluoride, they also form double salts with the latter. This gives the possibility of obtaining anhydrous fluorides NiF2 and CoF2. Crystalline fluoride of nickel, obtained by heating the amorphous powder formed by decomposing the double ammonium salt in a stream of hydrofluoric acid, occurs in beautiful green prisms, sp. gr. 4·63, which are insoluble in water, alcohol, and ether; sulphuric, hydrochloric, and nitric acids also have no action upon them, even when heated; NiF2 is decomposed by steam, with the formation of black oxide, which retains the crystalline structure of the salt. Fluoride of cobalt, obtained as a rose-coloured powder by decomposing the double ammonium salt with the aid of heat in a stream of hydrofluoric acid, fuses into a ruby-coloured mass which bears distinct signs of a crystalline structure; sp. gr. 4·43. The molten salt only volatilises at about 1400°, which forms a clear distinction between CoF2 and the volatile NiF2. Hydrochloric, sulphuric, and nitric acids act upon CoF2 even in the cold, although slowly, while when heated the reaction proceeds rapidly (Poulenc, 1892).

[34] Hydrated suboxide of cobalt (de Schulten, 1889) is obtained in the following manner. A solution of 10 grams of CoCl26H2O in 60 c.c. of water is heated in a flask with 250 grams of caustic potash and a stream of coal gas is passed through the solution. When heated the hydrate of the suboxide of cobalt which separates out, dissolves in the caustic potash and forms a dark blue solution. This solution is allowed to stand for 24 hours in an atmosphere of coal gas (in order to prevent oxidation). The crystalline mass which separates out has a composition Co(OH)2, and to the naked eye appears as a violet powder, which is seen to be crystalline under the microscope. The specific gravity of this hydrate is 3·597 at 15°. It does not undergo change in the air; warm acetic acid dissolves it, but it is insoluble in warm and cold solutions of ammonia and sal-ammoniac.

[34 bis] The following reaction may be added to those of the cobaltous and nickelous salts: potassium cyanide forms a precipitate with cobalt salts which is soluble in an excess of the reagent and forms a green solution. On heating this and adding a certain quantity of acid, a double cobalt cyanide is formed which corresponds with potassium ferricyanide. Its formation is accompanied with the evolution of hydrogen, and is founded upon the property which cobalt has of oxidising in an alkaline solution, the development of which has been observed in such a considerable measure in the cobaltamine salts. The process which goes on here may be expressed by the following equation; CoC2N2 + 4KCN first forms CoK4C6N6, which salt with water, H2O, forms potassium hydroxide, KHO, hydrogen, H, and the salt, K3CoC6N6. Here naturally the presence of the acid is indispensable in consequence of its being required to combine with the alkali. From aqueous solutions this salt crystallises in transparent, hexagonal prisms of a yellow colour, easily soluble in water. The reactions of double decomposition, and even the formation of the corresponding acid, are here completely the same as in the case of the ferricyanide. If a nickelous salt be treated in precisely the same manner as that just described for a salt of cobalt, decomposition will occur.

[35] The cobalt salts may be divided into at least the following classes, which repeat themselves for Cr, Ir, Rh (we shall not stop to consider the latter, particularly as they closely resemble the cobalt salts):—

(a) Ammonium cobalt salts, which are simply direct compounds of the cobaltous salts CoX2 with ammonia, similar to various other compounds of the salts of silver, copper, and even calcium and magnesium, with ammonia. They are easily crystallised from an ammoniacal solution, and have a pink colour. Thus, for instance, when cobaltous chloride in solution is mixed with sufficient ammonia to redissolve the precipitate first formed, octahedral crystals are deposited which have a composition CoCl2,H2O,6NH3. These salts are nothing else but combinations with ammonia of crystallisation—if it may be so termed—likening them in this way to combinations with water of crystallisation. This similarity is evident both from their composition and from their capability of giving off ammonia at various temperatures. The most important point to observe is that all these salts contain 6 molecules of ammonia to 1 atom of cobalt, and this ammonia is held in fairly stable connection. Water decomposes these salts. (Nickel behaves similarly without forming other compounds corresponding to the true cobaltic.)

(b) The solutions of the above-mentioned salts are rendered turbid by the action of the air; they absorb oxygen and become covered with a crust of oxycobaltamine salts. The latter are sparingly soluble in aqueous ammonia, have a brown colour, and are characterised by the fact that with warm water they evolve oxygen, forming salts of the following category: The nitrate may be taken as an example of this kind of salt; its composition is CoN2O7,5NH3,H2O. It differs from cobaltous nitrate, Co(NO3)2, in containing an extra atom of oxygen—that is, it corresponds with cobalt dioxide, CoO2, in the same way that the first salts correspond with cobaltous oxide; they contain 5, and not 6, molecules of ammonia, as if NH3 had been replaced by O, but we shall afterwards meet compounds containing either 5NH3 or 6NH3 to each atom of cobalt.

(c) The luteocobaltic salts are thus called because they have a yellow (luteus) colour. They are obtained from the salts of the first kind by submitting them in dilute solution to the action of the air; in this case salts of the second kind are not formed, because they are decomposed by an excess of water, with the evolution of oxygen and the formation of luteocobaltic salts. By the action of ammonia the salts of the fifth kind (roseocobaltic) are also converted into luteocobaltic salts. These last-named salts generally crystallise readily, and have a yellow colour; they are comparatively much more stable than the preceding ones, and even for a certain time resist the action of boiling water. Boiling aqueous potash liberates ammonia and precipitates hydrated cobaltic oxide, Co2O3,3H2O, from them. This shows that the luteocobaltic salts correspond with cobaltic oxide, Co2O3, and those of the second kind with the dioxide. When a solution of luteocobaltic sulphate, Co2(SO4)3,12NH3,4H2O, is treated with baryta, barium sulphate is precipitated, and the solution contains luteocobaltic hydroxide, Co(OH)3,6NH3, which is soluble in water, is powerfully alkaline, absorbs the oxygen of the air, and when heated is decomposed with the evolution of ammonia. This compound therefore corresponds to a solution of cobaltic hydroxide in ammonia. The luteocobaltic salts contain 2 atoms of cobalt and 12 molecules of ammonia—that is, 6NH3 to each atom of cobalt, like the salts of the first kind. The CoX2 salts have a metallic taste, whilst those of luteocobalt and others have a purely saline taste, like the salts of the alkali metals. In the luteo-salts all the X's react (are ionised, as some chemists say) as in ordinary salts—for instance, all the Cl2 is precipitated by a solution of AgNO3; all the (SO4)3 gives a precipitate with BaX2, &c. The double salt formed with PtCl4 is composed in the same manner as the potassium salt, K2PtCl4 = 2KCl + PtCl4, that is, contains (CoCl3,6NH3)2,3PtCl4, or the amount of chlorine in the PtCl4 is double that in the alkaline salt. In the rosepentamine (e), and rosetetramine (f), salts, also all the X's react or are ionised, but in the (g) and (h) salts only a portion of the X's react, and they are equal to the (e) and (f) salts minus water; this means that although the water dissolves them it is not combined with them, as PHO3 differs from PH3O3; phenomena of this class correspond exactly to what has been already (Chapter XXI., Note 7) mentioned respecting the green and violet salts of oxide of chromium.

(d) The fuscocobaltic salts. An ammoniacal solution of cobalt salts acquires a brown colour in the air, due to the formation of these salts. They are also produced by the decomposition of salts of the second kind; they crystallise badly, and are separated from their solutions by addition of alcohol or an excess of ammonia. When boiled they give up the ammonia and cobaltic oxide which they contain. Hydrochloric and nitric acids give a yellow precipitate with these salts, which turns red when boiled, forming salts of the next category. The following is an example of the composition of two of the fuscocobaltic salts, Co2O(SO4)2,8NH3,4H2O and Co2OCl4,8NH3,3H2O. It is evident that the fuscocobaltic salts are ammoniacal compounds of basic cobaltic salts. The normal cobaltic sulphate ought to have the composition Co2(SO4)3 = Co2O3,3SO3; the simplest basic salts will be Co2O(SO4)2 = Co2O3)2SO3, and Co2O2(SO4) = Co2O3,SO3. The fuscocobaltic salts correspond with the first type of basic salts. They are changed (in concentrated solutions) into oxycobaltamine salts by absorption of one atom of oxygen, Co2O2(SO4)2. The whole process of oxidation will be as follows: first of all Co2X4, a cobaltous salt, is in the solution (X a univalent haloid, 2 molecules of the salt being taken), then Co2OX4, the basic cobaltic salt (4th series), then Co2O2X4, the salt of the dioxide (2nd series). The series of basic salts with an acid, 2HX, forms water and a normal salt, Co2X6 (in 3, 5, 6 series). These salts are combined with various amounts of water and ammonia. Under many conditions the salts of fuscocobalt are easily transformed into salts of the next series. The salts of the series that has just been described contain 4 molecules of ammonia to 1 atom of cobalt.

(e) The roseocobaltic (or rosepentamine), CoX2H2O,5NH3, salts, like the luteocobaltic, correspond with the normal cobaltic salts, but contain less ammonia, and an extra molecule of water. Thus the sulphate is obtained from cobaltous sulphate dissolved in ammonia and left exposed to the air until transformed into a brown solution of the fuscocobaltic salt; when this is treated with sulphuric acid a crystalline powder of the roseocobaltic salt, Co2(SO4)3,10NH3,5H2O, separates. The formation of this salt is easily understood: cobaltous sulphate in the presence of ammonia absorbs oxygen, and the solution of the fuscocobaltic salt will therefore contain, like cobaltous sulphate, one part of sulphuric acid to every part of cobalt, so that the whole process of formation may be expressed by the equation: 10NH3 + 2CoSO4 + H2SO4 + 4H2O + O = Co2(SO4)3,10NH3,5H2O. This salt forms tetragonal crystals of a red colour, slightly soluble in cold, but readily soluble in warm water. When the sulphate is treated with baryta, roseocobaltic hydroxide is formed in the solution, which absorbs the carbonic anhydride of the air. It is obtained from the next series by the action of alkalis.

(f) The rosetetramine cobaltic salts CoCl2,2H2O,4NH3 were obtained by JÖrgenson, and belong to the type of the luteo-salts, only with the substitution of 2NH3 for H2O. Like the luteo- and roseo-salts they give double salts with PtCl4, similar to the alkaline double salts, for instance (Co2H2O,4NH3)2(SO4)2Cl2PtCl4. They are darker in colour than the preceding, but also crystallise well. They are formed by dissolving CoCO3 in sulphuric acid (of a given strength), and after NH3 and carbonate of ammonium have been added, air is passed through the solution (for oxidation) until the latter turns red. It is then evaporated with lumps of carbonate of ammonium, filtered from the precipitate and crystallised. A salt of the composition Co2(CO3)2(SO4),(2H2O,4NH3)2 is thus obtained, from which the other salts may be easily prepared.

(g) The purpureocobaltic salts, CoX3,5NH3, are also products of the direct oxidation of ammoniacal solutions of cobalt salts. They are easily obtained by heating the roseocobaltic and luteo-salts with strong acids. They are to all effects the same as the roseocobaltic salts, only anhydrous. Thus, for instance, the purpureocobaltic chloride, Co2Cl6,10NH3, or CoCl3,5NH3, is obtained by boiling the oxycobaltamine salts with ammonia. There is the same distinction between these salts and the preceding ones as between the various compounds of cobaltous chloride with water. In the purpureocobaltic only X2 out of the X3 react (are ionised). To the rosetetramine salts (f) there correspond the purpureotetramine salts, CoX3H2O,4NH3. The corresponding chromium purpureopentamine salt, CrCl3,5NH3 is obtained with particular ease (Christensen, 1893). Dry anhydrous chromium chloride is treated with anhydrous liquid ammonia in a freezing mixture composed of liquid CO2 and chlorine, and after some time the mixture is taken out of the freezing mixture, so that the excess of NH3 boils away; the violet crystals then immediately acquire the red colour of the salt, CrCl3,5NH3, which is formed. The product is washed with water (to extract the luteo-salt, CrCl3,6NH3), which does not dissolve the salt, and it is then recrystallised from a hot solution of hydrochloric acid.

(h) The praseocobaltic salts, CoX3,4NH3, are green, and form, with respect to the rosetetramine salts (f), the products of ultimate dehydration (for example, like metaphosphoric acid with respect to orthophosphoric acid, but in dissolving in water they give neither rosetetramine nor tetramine salts. (In my opinion one should expect salts with a still smaller amount of NH3, of the blue colour proper to the low hydrated compounds of cobalt; the green colour of the prazeo-salts already forms a step towards the blue.) JÖrgenson obtained salts for ethylene-diamine, N2H4C2H4 which replaces 2NH3. After being kept a long time in aqueous solution they give rosetetramine salts, just as metaphosphoric acid gives orthophosphoric acid, while the rosetetramine salts are converted into prazeo-salts by Ag2O and NaHO. Here only one X is ionised out of the X3. There are also basic salts of the same type; but the best known is the chromium salt called the rhodozochromic salt, Cr2(OH)3Cl3,6NH3,2H2O, which is formed by the prolonged action of water upon the corresponding roseo-salt.

The cobaltamine compounds differ essentially but little from the ammoniacal compounds of other metals. The only difference is that here the cobaltic oxide is obtained from the cobaltous oxide in the presence of ammonia. In any case it is a simpler question than that of the double cyanides. Those forces in virtue of which such a considerable number of ammonia molecules are united with a molecule of a cobalt compound, appertain naturally to the series of those slightly investigated forces which exist even in the highest degrees of combination of the majority of elements. They are the same forces which lead to the formation of compounds containing water of crystallisation, double salts, isomorphous mixtures and complex acids (Chapter XXI., Note 8 bis). The simplest conception, according to my opinion, of cobalt compounds (much more so than by assuming special complex radicles, with Schiff, Weltzien, Claus, and others), may be formed by comparing them with other ammoniacal products. Ammonia, like water, combines in various proportions with a multitude of molecules. Silver chloride and calcium chloride, just like cobalt chloride, absorb ammonia, forming compounds which are sometimes slightly stable, and easily dissociated, sometimes more stable, in exactly the same way as water combines with certain substances, forming fairly stable compounds called hydroxides or hydrates, or less stable compounds which are called compounds with water of crystallisation. Naturally the difference in the properties in both cases depends on the properties of those elements which enter into the composition of the given substance, and on those kinds of affinity towards which chemists have not as yet turned their attention. If boron fluoride, silicon fluoride, &c., combine with hydrofluoric acid, if platinic chloride, and even cadmium chloride, combine with hydrochloric acid, these compounds may be regarded as double salts, because acids are salts of hydrogen. But evidently water and ammonia have the same saline faculty, more especially as they, like haloid acids, contain hydrogen, and are both capable of further combination—for instance, ammonia with hydrochloric acid. Hence it is simpler to compare complex ammoniacal with double salts, hydrates, and similar compounds, but the ammonio-metallic salts present a most complete qualitative and quantitative resemblance to the hydrated salts of metals. The composition of the latter is MXnmH2O, where M = metal, X = the haloid, simple or complex, and n and m the quantities of the haloid and so-called water of crystallisation respectively. The composition of the ammoniacal salts of metals is MXnmNH3. The water of crystallisation is held by the salt with more or less stability, and some salts even do not retain it at all; some part with water easily when exposed to the air, others when heated, and then with difficulty. In the case of some metals all the salts combine with water, whilst with others only a few, and the water so combined may then be easily disengaged. All this applies equally well to the ammoniacal salts, and therefore the combination of ammonia may be termed the ammonia of crystallisation. Just as the water which is combined with a salt is held by it with different degrees of force, so it is with ammonia. In combining with 2NH3,PtCl2 evolves 31,000 cals.; while CaCl2 only evolves 14,000 cals.; and the former compound parts with its NH3 (together with HCl in this case) with more difficulty, only above 200°, while the latter disengages ammonia at 180°. ZnCl2,2NH3 in forming ZnCl2,4NH3 evolves only 11,000 cals., and splits up again into its components at 80°. The amount of combined ammonia is as variable as the amount of water of crystallisation—for instance, SnI48NH3, CrCl28NH3, CrCl36NH3, CrCl35NH3,PtCl2,4NH3, &c. are known. Very often NH3 is replaceable by OH2 and conversely. A colourless, anhydrous cupric salt—for instance, cupric sulphate—when combined with water forms blue and green salts, and violet when combined with ammonia. If steam be passed through anhydrous copper sulphate the salt absorbs water and becomes heated; if ammonia be substituted for the water the heating becomes much more intense, and the salt breaks up into a fine violet powder. With water CuSO4,5H2O is formed, and with ammonia CuSO4,5NH3, the number of water and ammonia molecules retained by the salt being the same in each case, and as a proof of this, and that it is not an isolated coincidence, the remarkable fact must be borne in mind that water and ammonia consecutively, molecule for molecule, are capable of supplanting each other, and forming the compounds CuSO4,5H2O, CuSO4,4H2O,NH3; CuSO4,3H2O,2NH3; CuSO4,2H2O,3NH3; CuSO4,H2O,4NH3, and CuSO4,5NH3. The last of these compounds was obtained by Henry Rose, and my experiments have shown that more ammonia than this cannot be retained. By adding to a strong solution of cupric sulphate sufficient ammonia to dissolve the whole of the oxide precipitated, and then adding alcohol, Berzelius obtained the compound CuSO4,H2O,4NH3, &c. The law of substitution also assists in rendering these phenomena clearer, because a compound of ammonia with water forms ammonium hydroxide, NH4HO, and therefore these molecules combining with one another may also interchange, as being of equal value. In general, those salts form stable ammoniacal compounds which are capable of forming stable compounds with water of crystallisation; and as ammonia is capable of combining with acids, and as some of the salts formed by slightly energetic bases in their properties more closely resemble acids (that is, salts of hydrogen) than those salts containing more energetic bases, we might expect to find more stable and more easily-formed ammonio-metallic salts with metals and their oxides having weaker basic properties than with those which form energetic bases. This explains why the salts of potassium, barium, &c., do not form ammonio-metallic salts, whilst the salts of silver, copper, zinc, &c., easily form them, and the salts RX3 still more easily and with greater stability. This consideration also accounts for the great stability of the ammoniacal compounds of cupric oxide compared with those of silver oxide, since the former is displaced by the latter. It also enables us to see clearly the distinction which exists in the stability of the cobaltamine salts containing salts corresponding with cobaltous oxide, and those corresponding with higher oxides of cobalt, for the latter are weaker bases than cobaltous oxides. The nature of the forces and quality of the phenomena occurring during the formation of the most stable substances, and of such compounds as crystallisable compounds, are one and the same, although perhaps exhibited in a different degree. This, in my opinion, may be best confirmed by examining the compounds of carbon, because for this element the nature of the forces acting during the formation of its compounds is well known. Let us take as an example two unstable compounds of carbon. Acetic acid, C2H4O2 (specific gravity 1·06), with water forms the hydrate, C2H4O2,H2O, denser (1·07) than either of the components, but unstable and easily decomposed, generally simply referred to as a solution. Such also is the crystalline compound of oxalic acid, C2H2O4, with water, C2H2O4,2H2O. Their formation might be predicted as starting from the hydrocarbon C2H6, in which, as in any other, the hydrogen may be exchanged for chlorine, the water residue (hydroxyl), &c. The first substitution product with hydroxyl, C2H5(HO), is stable; it can be distilled without alteration, resists a temperature higher than 100°, and then does not give off water. This is ordinary alcohol. The second, C2H4(HO)2, can also be distilled without change, but can be decomposed into water and C2H4O (ethylene oxide or aldehyde); it boils at about 197°, whilst the first hydrate boils at 78°, a difference of about 100°. The compound C2H3(HO)3 will be the third product of such substitution; it ought to boil at about 300°, but does not resist this temperature—it decomposes into H2O and C2H4O2, where only one hydroxyl group remains, and the other atom of oxygen is left in the same condition as in ethylene oxide, C2H4O. There is a proof of this. Glycol, C2H4(HO)2, boils at 197°, and forms water and ethylene oxide, which boils at 13° (aldehyde, its isomeride, boils at 21°); therefore the product disengaged by the splitting up of the hydrate boils at 184° lower than the hydrate C2H4(HO)2. Thus the hydrate C2H3(HO)3, which ought to boil at about 300°, splits up in exactly the same way into water and the product C2H4O2, which boils at 117°—that is, nearly 183° lower than the hydrate, C2H3(HO)3. But this hydrate splits up before distillation. The above-mentioned hydrate of acetic acid is such a decomposable hydrate—that is to say, what is called a solution. Still less stability may be expected from the following hydrates. C2H2(HO)4 also splits up into water and a hydrate (it contains two hydroxyl groups) called glycolic acid, C2H2O(HO)2 = C2H4O3. The next product of substitution will be C2H(HO)5; it splits up into water, H2O, and glyoxylic acid, C2H4O4 (three hydroxyl groups). The last hydrate which ought to be obtained from C2H6, and ought to contain C2(HO)6, is the crystalline compound of oxalic acid, C2H2O4 (two hydroxyl groups), and water, 2H2O, which has been already mentioned. The hydrate C2(HO)6 = C2H2O4,2H2O, ought, according to the foregoing reasoning, to boil at about 600° (because the hydrate, C2H4(HO)2, boils at about 200°, and the substitution of 4 hydroxyl groups for 4 atoms of hydrogen will raise the boiling-point 400°). It does not resist this temperature, but at a much lower point splits up into water, 2H2O, and the hydrate C2O2(HO)2, which is also capable of yielding water. Without going into further discussion of this subject, it may be observed that the formation of the hydrates, or compounds with water of crystallisation, of acetic and oxalic acids has thus received an accurate explanation, illustrating the point we desired to prove in affirming that compounds with water of crystallisation are held together by the same forces as those which act in the formation of other complex substances, and that the easy displaceability of the water of crystallisation is only a peculiarity of a local character, and not a radical point of distinction. All the above-mentioned hydrates, C2X6, or products of their destruction, are actually obtained by the oxidation of the first hydrate, C2H3(HO), or common alcohol, by nitric acid (Sokoloff and others). Hence the forces which induce salts to combine with nH2O or with NH3 are undoubtedly of the same order as the forces which govern the formation of ordinary ‘atomic’ and saline compounds. (A great impediment in the study of the former was caused by the conviction which reigned in the sixties and seventies, that ‘atomic’ were essentially different from ‘molecular’ compounds like crystallohydrates, in which it was assumed that there was a combination of entire molecules, as though without the participation of the atomic forces.) If the bond between chlorine and different metals is not equally strong, so also the bond uniting nH2O and nNH3 is exceeding variable; there is nothing very surprising in this. And in the fact that the combination of different amounts of NH3 and H2O alters the capacity of the haloids X of the salts RX2 for reaction (for instance, in the luteo-salts all the X3, while in the purpureo, only 2 out of the 3, and in the prazeo-salts only 1 of the 3 X's reacts), we should see in the first place a phenomenon similar to what we met with in Cr2Cl6 (Chapter XXI., Note 7 bis), for in both instances the essence of the difference lies in the removal of water; a molecule RCl3,6H2O or RCl3,6NH3 contains the halogen in a perfectly mobile (ionised) state, while in the molecule RCl3,5H2O or RCl3,5NH3 a portion of the halogen has almost lost its faculty for reacting with AgNO3, just as metalepsical chlorine has lost this faculty which is fully developed in the chloranhydride. Until the reason of this difference be clear, we cannot expect that ordinary points of view and generalisation can give a clear answer. However, we may assume that here the explanation lies in the nature and kind of motion of the atoms in the molecules, although as yet it is not clear how. Nevertheless, I think it well to call attention again (Chapter I.) to the fact that the combination of water, and hence, also, of any other element, leads to most diverse consequences; the water in the gelatinous hydrate of alumina or in the decahydrated Glauber salt is very mobile, and easily reacts like water in a free state; but the same water combined with oxide of calcium, or C2H4 (for instance, in C2H6O and in C4H10O), or with P2O5, has become quite different, and no longer acts like water in a free state. We see the same phenomenon in many other cases—for example, the chlorine in chlorates no longer gives a precipitate of chloride of silver with AgNO3. Thus, although the instance which is found in the difference between the roseo- and purpureo-salts deserves to be fully studied on account of its simplicity, still it is far from being exceptional, and we cannot expect it to be thoroughly explained unless a mass of similar instances, which are exceedingly common among chemical compounds, be conjointly explained. (Among the researches which add to our knowledge respecting the complex ammoniacal compounds, I think it indispensable to call the reader's attention to Prof. Kournakoff's dissertation ‘On complex metallic bases,’ 1893.)

Kournakoff (1894) showed that the solubility of the luteo-salt, CoCl3,6NH3, at 0° = 4·30 (per 100 of water), at 20° = 7·7, that in passing into the roseo-salt, CoCl3H2O5NH3, the solubility rises considerably, and at 0° = 16·4, and at 20° = about 27, whilst the passage into the purpureo-salt, CoCl3,5NH3, is accompanied by a great fall in the solubility, namely, at 0° = 0·23, and at 20° = about 0·5. And as crystallohydrates with a smaller amount of water are usually more soluble than the higher crystallohydrates (Le Chatelier), whilst here we find that the solubility falls (in the purpureo-salt) with a loss of water, that water which is contained in the roseo-salt cannot be compared with the water of crystallisation. Kournakoff, therefore, connects the fall in solubility (in the passage of the roseo- into the purpureo-salts) with the accompanying loss in the reactive capacity of the chlorine.

In conclusion, it may be observed that the elements of the eighth group—that is, the analogues of iron and platinum—according to my opinion, will yield most fruitful results when studied as to combinations with whole molecules, as already shown by the examples of complex ammoniacal, cyanogen, nitro-, and other compounds, which are easily formed in this eighth group, and are remarkable for their stability. This faculty of the elements of the eighth group for forming the complex compounds alluded to, is in all probability connected with the position which the eighth group occupies with regard to the others. Following the seventh, which forms the type RX7, it might be expected to contain the most complex type, RX8. This is met with in OsO4. The other elements of the eighth group, however, only form the lower types RX2, RX3, RX4 … and these accordingly should be expected to aggregate themselves into the higher types, which is accomplished in the formation of the above-mentioned complex compounds.

[35 bis] Marshall (1891) obtained cobaltic sulphate, Co2(SO4)3,18H2O, by the action of an electric current upon a strong solution of CoSO4.

[36] The action of an alkaline hypochlorite or hypobromite upon a boiling solution of cobaltous salts, according to Schroederer (1889), produces oxides, whose composition varies between Co3O5 (Rose's compound) and Co2O3, and also between Co5O8 and Co12O19. If caustic potash and then bromine be added to the liquid, only Co2O3 is formed. The action of alkaline hypochlorites or hypo-bromites, or of iodine, upon cobaltic salts, gives a highly-coloured precipitate which has a different colour to the hydrate of the oxide Co2(OH)6. According to Carnot the precipitate produced by the hypochlorites has a composition Co10O16, whilst that given by iodine in the presence of an alkali contains a larger amount of oxygen. Fortmann (1891) re-investigated the composition of the higher oxygen oxide obtained by iodine in the presence of alkali, and found that the greenish precipitate (which disengages oxygen when heated to 100°) corresponds to the formula CoO2. The reaction must be expressed by the equation: CoX2 + I2 + 4KHO = CoO2 + 2KX + 2KI + 2H2O.

[37] Prior to Fortmann, Rousseau (1889) endeavoured to solve the question as to whether CoO2 was able to combine with bases. He succeeded in obtaining a barium compound corresponding to this oxide. Fifteen grams of BaCl2 or BaBr2 are triturated with 5–6 grams of oxide of barium, and the mixture heated to redness in a closed platinum crucible; 1 gram of oxide of cobalt is then gradually added to the fused mass. Each addition of oxide is accompanied by a violent disengagement of oxygen. After a short time, however, the mass fuses quietly, and a salt settles at the bottom of the crucible, which, when freed from the residue, appears as black hexagonal, very brilliant crystals. In dissolving in water this substance evolves chlorine; its composition corresponds to the formula 2(CoO2)BaO. If the original mass be heated for a long time (40 hours), the amount of dioxide in the resultant mass decreases. The author obtained a neutral salt having the composition CoO2BaO (this compound = BaO2CoO) by breaking up the mass as it agglomerates together, and bringing the pieces into contact with the more heated surface of the crucible. This salt is formed between the somewhat narrow limits of temperature 1,000°-1,100°; above and below these limits compounds richer or poorer in CoO2 are formed. The formation of CoO2 by the action of BaO2, and the easy decomposition of CoO2 with the evolution of oxygen, give reason for thinking that it belongs to the class of peroxides (like Cr2O7, CaO2, &c.); it is not yet known whether they give peroxide of hydrogen like the true peroxides. The fact that it is obtained by means of iodine (probably through HIO), and its great resemblance to MnO2, leads rather to the supposition that CoO2 is a very feeble saline oxide. The form CoO2 is repeated in the cobaltic compounds (Note 35), and the existence of CoO2 should have long ago been recognised upon this basis.

[38] This compound is known as nickel tetra-carbonyl. It appears to me yet premature to judge of the structure of such an extraordinary compound as Ni(CO)4. It has long been known that potassium combines with CO forming Kn(CO)n (Chapter IX., Note 31), but this substance is apparently saline and non-volatile, and has as little in common with Ni(CO)4 as Na2H has with SbH3. However, Berthelot observed that when NiC4O4 is kept in air, it oxidises and gives a colourless compound, Ni3C2O3,10H2O, having apparently saline properties. We may add that SchÜtzenberger, on reducing NiCl2 by heating it in a current of hydrogen, observed that a nickel compound partially volatilises with the HCl and gives metallic nickel when heated again. The platinum compound, PtCl2(CO)3 (Chapter XXIII., Note 11), offers the greatest analogy to Ni(CO)4. This compound was obtained as a volatile substance by SchÜtzenberger by moderately heating (to 235°) metallic platinum in a mixture of chlorine and carbonic oxide. If we designate CO by Y, and an atom of chlorine by X, then taking into account that, according to the periodic system, Ni is an analogue of Pt, a certain degree of correspondence is seen in the composition NiY4 and PtX2Y2. It would be interesting to compare the reactions of the two compounds.

[39] According to its empirical formula oxalate of nickel also contains nickel and carbonic oxide.

[40] The following are the thermo-chemical data (according to Thomsen, and referred to gram weights expressed by the formula, in large calories or thousand units of heat) for the formation of corresponding compounds of Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu (+ Aq signifies that the reaction proceeds in an excess of water):

R = Mn Fe Co Ni Cu
R + Cl2 + Aq 128 100 95 94 63
R + Br2 + Aq 106 78 73 72 41
R + I2 + Aq 76 48 43 41 32
R + O + H2O 95 68 63 61 38
R + O2 + SO2 + nH2O 193 169 163 163 130
RCl2 + Aq +16 18 18 19 11

These examples show that for analogous reactions the amount of heat evolved in passing from Mn to Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu varies in regular sequences as the atomic weight increases. A similar difference is to be found in other groups and series, and proves that thermo-chemical phenomena are subject to the periodic law.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

Clyx.com


Top of Page
Top of Page