ge_19" class="pginternal">19
2.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., pp. 389–399; “Parson” Brownlow’s Book, pp. 54, 159, 160; Lalor’s Cyclopedia of Political Science, Political Economy and United States History, Vol. III. p. 698. 3.Letters and State Papers of Abraham Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 112. The edition of Nicolay and Hay is used throughout. 4.The Loyal Mountaineers of Tennessee, p. 24. 5.More correctly, 301,056. Ibid. 6.The Loyal Mountaineers of Tennessee, p. 32. 7.Ibid. 8.Thirty years before President Lincoln published his Emancipation Proclamation Great Britain abolished slavery throughout her colonies. Naturally this action was viewed in no friendly spirit by the slave interest in America, for it brought the free negro to the very door of the Southern States, and though it was regarded as a menace to the “peculiar institution,” it was not until a positive loss was sustained that any controversy arose with England. In October, 1841, the brig Creole, of Richmond, with a cargo of 135 slaves left Hampton Roads for New Orleans. The negroes, under Madison Washington, killed one of the owners, took possession of the vessel and steered her into the port of Nassau. There those slaves not expressly charged with murder were set at liberty, and though the administration demanded their surrender they were not given up. The experience of the Creole was not singular, several cases of a similar nature being recorded. These facts showed the danger of navigating the Bahama channel after 1833, and at least one reason for preferring the overland route down the Tennessee valley was an expectation of avoiding such accidents.—(See Wilson’s Rise and Fall of the Slave Power, Vol. I. pp. 443–444; Lalor’s Cyclopedia of Political Science, etc., Vol. I. pp. 709–710.) 9.Brownlow’s Book, p. 52. 10.The Loyal Mountaineers of Tennessee, pp. 80–81. 11.Brownlow’s Book, p. 67. 12.Art. I. sec. 10, Constitution of the United States. 13.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 5. 14.Misc. Doc. No. 55, H. of R., 1 Sess. 39th Cong., p. 5. 15.Why The Solid South? p. 170. 16.Cutt’s Conquest of California and New Mexico, p. 246. 17.Statesman’s Manual, Vol. IV. p. 1742. 18.Ibid. 19.The Lost Cause, p. 209. 20.Ann. Cycl., 1862, p. 763. 21.Life and Speeches of Andrew Johnson, pp. 451–456. Boston: Little, Brown & Co. 1866. 22.Life, Speeches, and Services of Andrew Johnson, pp. 101–104. Philadelphia: T. B. Peterson & Brothers. 23.Memorial Addresses on the Life and Character of Andrew Johnson, pp. 76–80; Memoir by Frank Moore, pp. xxvi-xxvii in Life and Speeches of Andrew Johnson. Boston: Little, Brown & Co. 24.Life of Andrew Johnson, pp. 98–101; Philadelphia: T. B. Peterson & Brothers. 25.Ann. Cycl., 1863, p. 828. 26.Letters and State Papers of Abraham Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 318. 27.Abraham Lincoln, A History by Nicolay & Hay, Vol. VIII. p. 440. 28.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 405. 29.History of Abraham Lincoln, by Isaac N. Arnold, p. 303. 30.Letters and State Papers of Abraham Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 408. 31.Ibid., p. 419. 32.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 443. 33.Art. I. sec. 5, Constitution of the U. S. 34.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. pp. 443–444. 35.Ibid., p. 486. 36.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 487. 37.Ibid., pp. 504–505. 38.Misc. Doc. No. 55, p. 5, H. of R., 1 Sess. 39th Cong. 39.Misc. Doc. No. 55, p. 9, H. of R., 1 Sess. 39th Cong. 40.Life of Andrew Johnson, pp. 159–160. 41.Life of Andrew Johnson, pp. 160–161. New York: D. Appleton & Co., 1866. 42.McClure’s Lincoln and Men of War Times, pp. 106–108; Blaine’s Twenty Years of Congress, Vol. II. p. 7; Hamlin’s Life and Times of Hannibal Hamlin, pp. 449–489 and 591–615. 43.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., pp. 438–439. 44.Ibid., p. 425. 45.Ibid., p. 441. 46.For a discussion of this subject see Chapter IX. 47.Ann. Cycl., 1861, p. 427. 48.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 4n. 49.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 25; Ann. Cycl., 1861, p. 428. 50.Ann. Cycl., 1861, p. 432. 51.Ibid. 52.Taylor’s Destruction and Reconstruction, pp. 102–103. 53.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 1. 54.Ann. Cycl., 1863, p. 589. 55.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II., pp. 214–215; Ann. Cycl., 1862, p. 650. 56.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II., p. 216. 57.Ibid., pp. 217–218. 58.Ann. Cycl., 1863, p. 586. 59.Ann. Cycl., 1863, p. 586. 60.Ibid. 61.Ann. Cycl., 1863, p. 586. 62.Ann. Cycl., 1863, p. 587; Ibid., pp. 770–776. Scott’s Reconstruction During the Civil War, pp. 325–326, 328–331, 376. 63.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 247. 64.Ibid. 65.Ibid., p. 255. 66.Globe, Part I., 3 Sess. 37th Cong., p. 835. 67.Globe, Part I., 3 Sess. 37th Cong., pp. 831–837, 1030–1036. 68.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., pp. 228–229. 69.Blaine’s Twenty Years of Congress, Vol. II. p. 39; Nicolay and Hay’s Lincoln, Vol. VIII. p. 419. 70.Ann. Cycl., 1863, p. 589. 71.N. & H., Vol. VIII. p. 420. 72.Ann. Cycl., 1863, p. 590; Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 536. 73.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 356. 74.Ibid., pp. 214–215. 75.Ibid., p. 356. 76.Taylor’s Destruction and Reconstruction, ch. x; also the general history of military operations in the Red River country. 77.Bulloch’s Secret Service of the Confederate States in Europe, Vol. II. chs. i and ii. 78.N. & H., Vol. VIII. pp. 285–286; Conduct of the War, Vol. II. pp. 1–401 (passim). 79.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 380. 80.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 436. 81.Ann. Cycl., 1863, p. 591. 82.Ibid. 83.Ann. Cycl., 1863, pp. 591–592. 84.Globe, Part I., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 5–6. 85.Globe, Part I., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 411–415, 543–547. 87.Ann. Cycl., 1863, pp. 592–593. 88.Globe, Part I., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 543. 89.Ann. Cycl., 1863, p. 590. 90.Ann. Cycl., 1863, p. 591. 91.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. pp. 458–459. 92.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. pp. 465–466. 93.N. & H., Vol. VIII. pp. 428–430. 94.Ibid., p. 469. 95.Ann. Cycl., 1863, p. 592. 96.Ann. Cycl., 1863, pp. 592–593. 97.Ann. Cycl., 1864, p. 476. 98.Ibid. 99.Ann. Cycl., 1864, p. 476. 100.N. & H., Vol. VIII. pp. 432–433. 101.Ann. Cycl., 1863, pp. 593–594. 102.Ann. Cycl., 1864, p. 477. 103.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 496. 104.Twenty Years of Congress, Vol. II. p. 40. 105.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 498. 106.Ann. Cycl., 1864, p. 478. 107.Ibid. 108.Ann. Cycl., 1864, pp. 478–479. 109.Ibid. 110.Ibid., p. 479. 111.Ann. Cycl., 1864, p. 479. 112.Ibid. 113.Ann. Cycl., 1861, p. 22. 114.Ibid. 115.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 4. 116.Ann. Cycl., 1861, p. 22. 117.Ibid. 118.Ibid., p. 23. 119.Ibid., pp. 23–24. 120.Ann. Cycl., 1861, p. 24. 121.Ibid. 122.Ann. Cycl., 1861, p. 24. 123.Ibid. 124.Ibid. 125.Ann. Cycl., 1861, p. 25. 126.Ibid. 127.Ibid. 128.Ibid., 1862, p. 11. 129.Ann. Cycl., 1862, p. 11. 130.Ibid. 131.Ibid. 132.N. & H., Vol. VI. p. 346. 133.Ann. Cycl., 1863, p. 15. 134.Ann. Cycl., 1863, p. 15. 135.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 379. 136.Ibid., p. 247. 137.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 467. 138.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. pp. 472–473. 139.Ann. Cycl., 1864, p. 29; Hough’s American Constitutions, Vol. II. p. 81. 140.Quoted in N. & H., Vol. VIII. p. 414. 141.Hough’s Amer. Cons., Vol. II. p. 81. 142.Ann. Cycl., 1864, p. 29. 143.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 475. 144.Ibid., p. 476. 145.Ibid., p. 479. 146.Ibid., p. 482. 147.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. pp. 483–484. 148.Ann. Cycl., 1864, pp. 29–30. 149.Ibid., p. 30. 150.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 501. 151.Ibid., p. 515. 152.Ann. Cycl., 1864, p. 30. 153.See remarks of Senator Pomeroy, February 2, 1865, Congressional Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 555. 154.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 7. 155.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 7n. 156.Eighth Census, pp. 516–522. 157.Density maps in Tenth Census (Population), pp. xii-xiii, xiv-xv, xvi-xvii. 158.Blair in Appendix to Globe, pp. 327–331, 2 Sess. 37th Cong.; Eighth Census, pp. 516–522; Seventh Census, pp. 242–261. 159.Parker, The Formation of West Virginia, p. 125. 160.Globe, 2 Sess. 37th Cong., p. 3038. 161.Ann. Cycl., 1861, pp. 743–744. 162.The Formation of West Virginia, p. 36. 163.The Formation of West Virginia, p. 42. 164.Ann. Cycl., 1861, pp. 742–743. 165.The Formation of West Virginia, p. 43. 166.Ibid. 167.Ann. Cycl., 1861, p. 743; The Formation of West Virginia, p. 45, gives the oath in a form slightly different. 168.Ann. Cycl., 1861, p. 743. 169.Ann. Cycl., 1862, p. 801. 170.Mr. A. W. Campbell in The Wheeling Daily Intelligencer, April 14, 1897. 171.Globe, 1 Sess. 37th Cong., pp. 103–109. 172.The Formation of West Virginia, pp. 47–48. 173.The Formation of West Virginia, pp. 48–50; also Ann. Cycl., 1861, p. 745. 174.The Formation of West Virginia, p. 57. 175.The Formation of West Virginia, p. 79. 176.Ibid., p. 93. 177.The Formation of West Virginia, p. 96, says 16,981 for and 441 against the constitution. The Annual CyclopÆdia for 1862, p. 801, gives the vote as 18,862 in favor of, and 514 against, the constitution. Poore’s Charters and Constitutions, Vol. II. p. 1977, is the authority for the statement in the text. 178.Globe, Part III., 2 Sess. 37th Cong., p. 864; Part IV., pp. 2941–2942, 3034–3039, 3134–3135, 3307–3320. 179.Globe, 2 Sess. 37th Cong., p. 2933. 180.Ibid., p. 3397. 181.Globe, Part I., 3 Sess. 37th Cong., pp. 37–38. 182.Globe, Part I., 3 Sess. 37th Cong., pp. 38–39, 41–42. 183.Globe, Part I., 3 Sess. 37th Cong., pp. 43–45. 184.Ibid., p. 46. 185.Ibid., pp. 46–47. 186.Globe, Part I., 3 Sess. 37th Cong., p. 48. 187.Globe, Part I., 3 Sess. 37th Cong., pp. 50–51. 188.Ibid., p. 35. 189.Globe, Part I., 3 Sess. 37th Cong., pp. 54–55. 190.Ibid., p. 59. 191.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 283. 192.Quoted in N. & H., Vol. VI. pp. 300–301. 193.Quoted in N. & H., Vol. VI. pp. 302–303. 194.Ibid., p. 304. 195.Quoted in N. & H., Vol. VI. pp. 304–306. 197.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. pp. 285–287. 198.The Formation of West Virginia, p. 152. 199.Ibid., pp. 192–193. 200.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 326. 201.Webster’s Works, Vol. II. pp. 607–608. 202.By a joint resolution, approved March 10, 1866, Congress agreed that both counties formed a part of West Virginia. The parent State, however, by an act of December 5, 1865, had already repealed both the statutes of January 31 and February 4, 1863, as well as section two of the act of May 13, 1862; and on December 11, 1866, a bill in equity was filed in the Supreme Court of the United States in which it was contended that it was not the intention of that State to consent to the annexation of Berkeley and Jefferson counties except upon the performance of certain conditions; the state of the county on election day was such as not to permit the opening of all the polls in Berkeley and Jefferson, nor indeed at any considerable part of the usual election places. The voters did not have adequate notice. In short, a great majority of them were then and now, December, 1866, opposed to annexation. Other irregularities are alleged in the complaint of Virginia. A decision, however, has been rendered by the Supreme Court of the United States in favor of the new Commonwealth. [See Virginia vs. West Virginia, 11 Wall., p. 39; also Transcripts of Records, Supreme Court U. S., Vol. 152, December Term, 1870.] 203.Notwithstanding the new State had been organized by a law which passed both Houses of Congress, and was approved by the President, Mr. Davis, of Kentucky, when the members-elect presented themselves before the Senate, opposed their admission on the ground that there was legally and constitutionally no such State in existence as West Virginia. On his motion to administer the customary oath thirty-six Senators voted in the affirmative, five in the negative. [Globe, 1 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 1–3.] 204.A History of Presidential Elections, Stanwood, pp. 246–247. Edition of 1884. 205.Ann. Cycl., 1864, p. 809. 206.Butler’s Book, p. 618. 207.N. & H., Abraham Lincoln, A History, Vol. IX. pp. 439–442. 208.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. pp. 619–621. 209.Ibid., p. 623. 210.Why The Solid South? p. 222. 211.Ann. Cycl., 1864, p. 810. 212.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 845–849. 213.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 209. 214.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 1. 215.Addresses and Papers of Edward L. Pierce, pp. 20–25. 216.Addresses and Papers of E. L. Pierce, p. 26. 217.McPherson’s Pol. Hist. p. 244. 218.Ibid. 219.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 244. 220.Ibid., p. 245. 221.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 235n. 222.Addresses and Papers of E. L. Pierce, p. 29. 223.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 245. 224.Appendix, Globe, 1 Sess. 37th Cong., p. 42. 225.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 245. 226.Ibid., pp. 245–246. 227.General Anderson had telegraphed President Lincoln that an entire company of Kentucky soldiers had laid down their arms upon hearing of Fremont’s action. 228.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 77. 229.Ibid., pp. 78–79. 230.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., pp. 247–248. 231.Ibid., p. 248. 232.N. Y. Tribune, November 8, 1861. 233.Letters and State Papers of Abraham Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 90. 234.Ibid. 235.Ann. Cycl., 1861, p. 646. 236.First Annual Message, December 3, 1861. McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 134; Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. pp. 102–103. 237.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 249. 238.Letters and State Papers of Abraham Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 91. 239.See “Journal of the Senate of the State of Delaware, At a Special Session of the General Assembly, Commenced and held at Dover, on Monday, the 25th day of November, 1861.” 240.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 250. 241.Ibid., p. 248. 242.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 250. 243.Ibid. 244.Ibid., p. 251. 245.Addresses and Papers of E. L. Pierce, p. 87; also Letters and State Papers of Abraham Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 126. 246.Letters and State Papers of Abraham Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 129. 247.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. pp. 129–130. 248.Ann. Cycl., 1862, pp. 799–800. 249.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 132. 250.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 210. 251.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. pp. 133–135; also McPherson’s Pol. Hist., pp. 210–211. 252.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. pp. 137–138. 253.Ann. Cycl., 1862, pp. 346–347. 254.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 37th Cong., p. 1496. 256.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., pp. 226–227. 257.The question of colonizing free blacks out of the United States engaged the attention of Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe, who had some correspondence on the subject at the beginning of the nineteenth century. Late in the year 1816 there was organized in the city of Washington the “National Colonization Society,” of which the expressed purpose was to encourage emancipation by procuring a place outside the United States, preferably in Africa, to which free negroes could be aided in emigrating. This, it was believed, would rid the South of its free colored population which had already become a nuisance. Until 1830 it was warmly supported everywhere, and branches of the society were established in nearly every State. In the South its purposes were furthered by James Madison, by Charles Carroll and by Henry Clay. Bushrod Washington became president of the association. Rufus King and President Harrison were among its friends in the North. Though Texas and Mexico were looked upon as favorable places for locating a colony of free blacks, they were sent to the British possession of Sierra Leone. In 1821 a permanent location was purchased in Liberia. This settlement, with Monrovia as its capital, became independent in 1847. The American Colonization Society attracted little notice after the rise, about 1829–30, of those known as immediate abolitionists. 258.Letters and State Papers of Abraham Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 155. 259.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 251. 260.Ibid., p. 252. 261.Globe, Part III., 2 Sess. 37th Cong., p. 2068. 262.Ibid., p. 2618. Ibid., p. 2769. 263.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 233. 264.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. pp. 204–205. 265.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., pp. 214–217. 266.Ibid., pp. 217–218. 267.Ibid., p. 218. 268.Ibid., pp. 218–220. 269.Quoted in Nicolay and Hay’s Abraham Lincoln, A History. Vol. VI. p. 121 et seq. 270.Schuckers’ Life of Salmon Portland Chase, pp. 439–440. 271.Ibid., p. 440. 272.Shuckers’ Life of Chase, pp. 440–441. 273.Ibid., p. 441. 274.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 213. 275.Carpenter’s Six Months at the White House, pp. 21–22. 276.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 214. 277.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., pp. 231–232. 278.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 233. 279.Quoted in Schuckers’ Life of Chase, pp. 453–455. 280.The Galaxy, December, 1872, pp. 846–847. 281.Ibid., p. 847. 282.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 106. 283.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 129. 284.Ibid., p. 125. 286.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., pp. 322–323. 287.Memoir of Charles Sumner by E. L. Pierce, Vol. IV. pp. 74–75. 288.General Richard Taylor in Destruction and Reconstruction, p. 245. 289.Blaine, Twenty Years of Congress, Vol. II. p. 114. 290.Memoir of Sumner by E. L. Pierce, Vol. IV. p. 143. 291.Mr. Sumner, notwithstanding this view, proposed to enact the Emancipation Proclamation into a law. See pp. 272–273 infra. 292.N. and H., Vol. IX. pp. 335–336. 293.In his Theory of our National Existence (passim) and in the American Law Review for January, 1865, Mr. John C. Hurd has much keen criticism of the reconstruction theories of Sumner and others. 294.Colloquy with Senator Doolittle, December 19, 1866, Cong. Globe, p. 192. 295.Brownson’s American Republic, p. 308. 296.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 323. 297.Mr. Davis is sometimes classed as a Unionist. 298.Globe, 1 Sess. 37th Cong., p. 414. 299.Globe, Part I., 3 Sess. 37th Cong., p. 238. 300.Globe, Part I., 1 Sess. 37th Cong., pp. 239–243. 301.Globe, Part I., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 317. 302.Texas vs. White, 7 Wall., p. 725. 303.See Chapter VII., pp. 257–261, infra. 304.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 36th Cong., p. 857. 305.Globe, 1 Sess. 37th Cong., pp. 222–223. 306.Ibid., p. 258. 307.Globe, 1 Sess. 37th Cong., p. 259. 308.Ann. Cycl., 1862, p. 277. 310.Globe, Part I., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 33. 311.Globe, Part I., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 34. 312.Appendix, Part IV., Globe, 1 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 82–85; also Speeches and Addresses of Henry Winter Davis. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1867, pp. 368–383. 313.Globe, Part III., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 1970–1972. 314.Globe, Part III., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 1974–1981. 315.Ibid., pp. 1981–1983. 316.Globe, Part III., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 2002–2006. 317.Globe, Part III., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 2008. 318.Globe, Part III., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 2011–2014. 319.Globe, Part III., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 2038. 320.Globe, Part III., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 2039–2041. 321.Ibid., p. 2041. 322.Globe, Part III., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 2041–2042. 323.Ibid., p. 2043. 324.Globe, Part III., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 2071. 325.Globe, Part III., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 2073. 326.Ibid., p. 2074. 327.Globe, Part III., 1 Sess 38th Cong., p. 2078. 328.Globe, Part III., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 2095–2102. 329.Globe, Part III., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 2102–2105. 330.Globe, Part III., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 2105–2107. 331.Globe, Part III., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 2108. 332.Globe, Part IV., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 3448–3449. 333.Ibid., p. 3449. 334.Globe, Part IV., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., pp 3448–3450. 335.Globe, Part IV., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 3451–3453. 336.Ibid., p. 3460. 337.Globe, Part IV., 1 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 3461. 338.Ibid., p. 3491. 339.Diary of John Hay, quoted in Abraham Lincoln, A History, Vol. IX. pp. 120–122. 340.Pierce’s Memoir of Sumner, Vol. IV. pp. 57, 60, 83, 84, 106, 108, 130, etc. 341.Shuckers’ Life of Chase, pp. 440n, 442, 453, 495. 342.Letters and State Papers of Abraham Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 545; McPherson’s Pol. Hist., pp. 318–319. 343.Ann. Cycl., 1864, pp. 307–310n. 344.Twenty Years of Congress, Vol. II. p. 44. 345.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., p. 557. 346.McPherson’s Pol. Hist., pp. 555–558. 347.Rise and Fall of the Slave Power in America, Vol. III. p. 452. 348.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 12–13. 349.Ibid., p. 234. 350.Pierce, Memoir of Charles Sumner, Vol. IV. p. 205. 351.Ibid., p. 221. 352.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 281–291. 353.An interesting account of the imprisonment of colored seamen in the ports of South Carolina is given in The Rise and Fall of the Slave Power in America, Vol. I. pp. 576–586. 354.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 298–301. 355.Ibid. 356.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 934–937. 357.Ibid., pp. 937–939. 358.Appendix to Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 73–75. 359.Appendix to Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 75–83. 360.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 968–969. 361.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 969–970. 362.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 970–971. 363.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 997–1001. 364.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 1002. 365.Ibid. 366.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 505. 367.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 533. 368.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 534–535. 369.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 535–536. 370.Ibid., p. 536. 371.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 535–537. 372.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 537, 548. 373.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 548–549. 374.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 549–550. 375.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 550. 376.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 550–551. 377.Ibid., pp. 551–552. 378.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 553–554. 379.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 554–555. 380.Ibid., pp. 555–556. 381.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 556. 382.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 557–558. 383.Ibid., p. 558. 384.Ibid. 385.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 576–582. 386.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 575. 387.Ibid., pp. 576–582. 388.Ibid., p. 582. 389.Ibid., p. 583. 390.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 585. 391.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 591. 392.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 593. 393.Ibid., p. 594. 394.Ibid., pp. 594–595. 395.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 595. 396.The subject of the counting of the electoral votes will be found in the Congressional Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 668–669. 397.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 711. 398.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 711. 399.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 1395. 400.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 971–974. 401.Ibid., p. 903. 402.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 1011. 403.Ibid. 404.Ibid. 405.Globe, Part I., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 1061–1064. 406.While this chapter was in press an interesting letter from Senator Henderson informed the author that the Hon. Samuel Treat, of St. Louis, formerly Judge of the United States Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, is the distinguished jurist referred to in the text. 407.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 1065–1070. 408.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 1091. 409.In support of this view the Senator cited Penhallow’s Case, 3 Dallas, p. 94. 410.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 1091–1095. 411.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 1097. 412.Ibid. 413.Ibid., pp. 1095–1098. 414.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 1099. 415.Ibid., pp. 1101–1102. 416.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 1101–1102. 417.Ibid., p. 1102. 418.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., pp. 1106–1107. 419.Ibid., p. 1107. 420.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 1111. 421.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 1128. 422.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 1129. 423.Ibid. 424.Globe, Part II., 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 1129. 425.Globe, 2 Sess. 38th Cong., p. 141 (appendix). 426.Personal Recollections of Abraham Lincoln, by James R. Gilmore. 427.Gorham’s Life and Public Services of Edwin M. Stanton, Vol. II. pp. 148–153. 428.N. and H., Vol. X. pp. 101–102. 429.N. and H., Vol. X. p. 107. 430.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. pp. 644–645. 431.An interesting account of this entire subject will be found in Nicolay and Hay’s Lincoln, Vol. X. ch. VI.; see also Raymond’s Life of Lincoln, pp. 647–662. 432.The Lost Cause, pp. 684–685. 433.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. pp. 597–598. 434.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. pp. 616–617. 435. 436.This recollection has been verified by correspondence with Col. A. K. McClure, the gentleman referred to.—Author. 437.Ex. Doc. No. 70, H. of R., 1 Sess. 39th Cong., p. 78. 438.Ann. Cycl., 1865, p. 28. 439.Ann. Cycl., 1865, p. 28. 440.Acts of the State of Tennessee, 1865, p. 33. 441.Ann. Cycl., 1865, p. 779. 442.Ibid. 443.This election resulted in the choice of Nathaniel G. Taylor, Horace Maynard, Edmund Cooper, Isaac R. Hawkins, John W. Leftwich, William B. Stokes, William B. Campbell and Dorsey B. Thomas. The last named, however, was affected by the Governor’s recount, and Daniel W. Arnell, who was declared the successful candidate, was admitted to Congress with the other Tennessee Representatives on the 24th of July, 1866. See Why the Solid South? pp. 182–183. 444.Ann. Cycl., 1865, p. 780. 445.Ann. Cycl., 1865, p. 781. 446.Ibid. 447.Having been elected United States Senator, Mr. Hahn resigned the governorship on the 4th of March and was succeeded in office by Lieutenant-Governor Wells. 448.Ann. Cycl., 1865, p. 510. 449.Globe, Part I., 1 Sess. 39th Cong., p. 101. 450.Three Decades of Federal Legislation, p. 429; also Why the Solid South? p. 397. 451.Poore’s Charters and Constitutions, Vol. II. p. 1938 et seq. 452.Letters and State Papers of Lincoln, Vol. II. p. 670. 453.Letter of Mrs. Anna Pierpont Siviter to the author. 454.Ann. Cycl., 1865, p. 817. 455.Ibid. 456.Ann. Cycl., 1865, p. 817. 457.McPherson’s Hand-Book of Politics, 1868, p. 46. 458.Ann. Cycl., 1865, p. 800. 459.Twenty Years of Congress, Vol. II. pp. 9–11. 460.Ann. Cycl., 1865, p. 800. 461.McPherson’s Pol. Hand-Book, 1868, pp. 45–46. 462.Ann. Cycl., 1865, pp. 801–802. 463.Ann. Cycl., 1865, p. 802. 464.Letcher and Smith were Governors of Virginia during the war. 465.McPherson’s Pol. Hand-Book, 1868, p. 8. 466.Twenty Years of Congress, Vol. II. p. 70. 467.McPherson’s Pol. Hand-Book, 1868, pp. 10–11. 468.Ann. Cycl., 1865, p. 626. 469.This ordinance was ratified by a vote of 20,506 to 2,002; Poore’s Charters and Constitutions, Vol. II. p. 1419n; also Three Decades of Federal Legislation, p. 385. 470.Ratified by 19,039 to 3,970 votes. Poore’s Charters and Constitutions, Vol. II. p. 1419n. 471.McPherson’s Pol. Hand-Book, 1868, p. 19. 472.Harper’s New Monthly Magazine, Vol. XXXII., p. 127. 473.Ann. Cycl., 1865, p. 628. 474.McClure’s Magazine, Dec., 1899, p. 174. 475.The Provisional appointments were made in the following order: June 13, 1865, William L. Sharkey, Mississippi; June 17, James Johnson, Georgia, and Andrew J. Hamilton, Texas; June 21, Lewis E. Parsons, Alabama; June 30, Benjamin F. Perry, South Carolina; July 13, William Marvin, Florida. 476.Ann. Cycl., 1865, p. 580. 477.Ann. Cycl., 1865, p. 581. 478.Ann. Cycl., 1865, p. 583. 479.Constitution of the United States, by Francis N. Thorpe, p. 49. 480.See Why The Solid South? pp. 9–10, for an ingenious explanation of the unanimity and promptness with which the Presidential policy of reconstruction was accepted by the South. 481.Laws of Mississippi, pp. 86–88. 482.Ibid., pp. 89–90. 483.Laws of Mississippi, 1865, pp. 82–86. 484.Ibid., p. 231. 485.Laws of Mississippi, 1865, pp. 165–167. 486.Laws of Mississippi, 1865, pp. 90–93. 487.Laws of Mississippi, 1865, pp. 199–200. 488.Ibid., pp. 210–211. 489.Ibid., p. 240. 490.Ann. Cycl., 1866, p. 132. 491.Ann. Cycl., 1863, pp. 780–781. 492.Gorham’s Life of Stanton, Vol. II. p. 255. 493.McPherson’s Pol. Hand-Book, 1868, p. 25. 494.President Johnson and Reconstruction, pp. 33–34. 495.In this connection his repudiation of the Sherman-Johnston agreement will occur to the reader. 496.Strait’s Roster of Regimental Surgeons and Assistant Surgeons, p. 314. This estimate includes all the troops furnished by the new State of West Virginia. 497.The author believes himself fortunate in being able to place before his readers a letter from the pen of Hon. J. B. Henderson, the only surviving Senator who participated in the debates summarized in chapter X., and, so far as the writer is informed, the only living member who served in the United States Senate during that eventful period. Coming, as it does, from one who supported many of Mr. Lincoln’s most cherished measures, the letter will be welcomed as a valuable historical document. It contrasts forcibly the Presidential plan with the theory of Senator Sumner, and though written on August 21, 1901, more than a generation after the occurrence of the principal events discussed in this book, it is characterized by the clearness and the energy of expression which marked even the unpremeditated addresses of the Senator’s Congressional career. On the subject of reunion he writes as follows: “Time, in my judgment, has stamped its approval on Mr. Lincoln’s views touching the questions of reconstruction during the Civil War. He was always calm and judicial. He was philosophical in periods of the most intense excitement. He never lost his head, but under all circumstances preserved his temper and his judgment. He was not the buffoon described by his enemies. On the contrary, he was a wise statesman, a learned lawyer, and a conscientious patriot; and, better than all, an honest man. “The infirmity in Mr. Sumner’s theories of reconstruction came from the great exuberance of his learning. He ransacked history, ancient and modern, for precedents growing out of civil wars. But these precedents all antedated the American Constitution. They grew out of monarchical systems of government, and had no relation to the republican forms created by our Constitution. Under our system there can be no suicide of a State. Individual citizens by rebellion and disloyalty may forfeit their political rights, but the State as an entity commits no treason and forfeits no rights to existence. Under our Constitution the State cannot die. It is the duty of the Federal Government to see that it does not die—that it shall never cease to exist. If the State be invaded from without, the duty of the General Government is to protect and defend it. If domestic violence threatens the subversion of the local government, the nation’s duty is to intervene and uphold the hands of those who maintain the laws. The trustee of an express trust cannot excuse himself to a minority of the beneficiaries because the majority repudiate his agency. “‘The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a republican form of government.’ No State government is republican in form that does not acknowledge the supremacy of the Federal Constitution. This is the essential test of republicanism. No State can enter the Union without conforming its Constitution to this supreme organic law. And whenever by force or violence, a majority of its citizens undertake to withdraw the State from its obedience to Federal law and to repudiate the sovereignty of the Federal Government, it at once becomes the duty of Congress to act. “This duty of Congress is not to destroy the State or to declare it a suicide, and proceed to administer on its effects. On the contrary, the duty clearly is to preserve the State, to restore it to its old republican forms. Its duty is not to territorialize the State and proceed to govern it as a conquered colony. The duty is not one of demolition, but one of restoration. It is not to make a Constitution, but to guarantee that the old Constitution or one equally republican in form, and made by the loyal citizens of the State, shall be upheld and sustained. “If a majority of the people of a State conspire to subvert its republican forms, that majority may be, and should be, put down by the Federal power, while the minority, however few, sustaining republican forms may be constitutionally installed as the political power of the State. “These, as I understand, were the views of Mr. Lincoln; and they were not the views of Mr. Sumner, as enunciated in his resolutions of 1862 and advocated by him in his subsequent career in the Senate. “A departure from these views gave us the carpet-bag governments of the Southern States, and brought upon us divers other evils in our ideas and theories of government, whose effects are yet visible.” 498.N. & H., Vol. X., p. 145. 499. |