[5] Speech of Vice-Chancellor Sir W. P. Wood. p. 5.[7] Against profane dealing with Holy Matrimony, by the Rev. John Keble, pp. 12, 13. J. H. Parker. 1849.[8] Ibid. pp. 13, 14.[9] Letter to Rev. W. H. Lyall, by Rev. A. M’Caul, D.D., pp. 1–4. Wertheim, Mackintosh, and Hunt. 1859.[10] Speech of Sir W. P. Wood, pp. 5, 6.[11] Dr. M’Caul’s Letter to Sir W. P. Wood, 1860, p. 55.[12] See Note at the end of Appendix.[13a] Appendix A.[13b] Canon 99.—“None to marry within the degrees prohibited.” “And all such marriages so made shall be judged incestuous and unlawful.”

A Table of kindred and affinity, wherein whosoever are related are forbidden in Scripture and our laws to marry together.—Book of Common Prayer.[14] Letter, p. 55.[15] St. Matt. xxii. 24.[16] It may be useful just to state that the law termed the law of the Levirate is that law laid down in Deut. xxv. 5–10, that in case a Jew dying childless, his brother should take his wife and raise up seed unto his brother.[18] Letter to Rev. W. H. Lyall, p. 14.[20] Letter to Vice-Chancellor Sir W. Page Wood, p. 29–31.[21] Appendix B.[23] Lev. xviii., 20–30.[24] See Dr. Pusey’s Evidence before the Royal Commission, First Report, p. 37, questions 431–3.[30] It is, moreover, evident that something of the kind of the law of the Levirate was a usage of the Patriarchal times, from the history recorded as to the sons of Judah in the book of Genesis.[32] St. Luke xxiv. 27.[36] Appendix C.[40] Second Letter of Vice-Chancellor Sir W. Page Wood, pp. 47–63.