CHAPTER XV.

Previous

FOSSIL ICHTHYOLOGY; COMPRISING THE GANOID, CTENOID, AND CYCLOID FISHES.

The fishes we have hitherto examined belong to the first order, the Placoidians; we now pass to the fossil remains of the second order, the Ganoidians, which are distinguished by their brilliant angular scales, formed of osseous or horny plates, densely covered with enamel. This order contains six or more families, comprising many genera and numerous species; our investigation must be restricted to a selection from the principal genera of the Ganoids, properly so called, and of the Sauroids, or lizard-like fishes.[530]

[530] The fishes of these orders are described in Poiss. Foss. tom. ii.

The first family, termed Lepidoides, contains several genera, which are defined as possessing either numerous rows of brush-teeth, or of obtuse conical teeth; flat, rhomboidal scales, arranged parallel with the body; and an osseous, or partially osseous, skeleton. In one division of this family, the body is either elongated or fusiform, the mouth furnished with brash-teeth only, and the tail heterocercal, or unequally bilobed (see p. 576). To this group belong several genera, which are restricted to the Secondary formations more ancient than the Oolite; while the other group, with homocercal tails, lived in the Oolitic and Cretaceous seas. Two genera, in particular, abound in the Permian and Carboniferous strata; namely, Amblypterus and PalÆoniscus.[531]

[531] For the characters, affinities, and distribution of these and the allied genera of the Heterocerque Ganoid fishes, see Sir P. Egerton’s Memoir in the sixth volume of the Quarterly Geological Journal.

Amblypterus. Lign. 187. Wond. p. 740. Bd. pl. xxvii.b.—The fishes of this genus, as the name indicates, have very large and wide fins, composed of numerous rays. The scales are rhomboidal and finely enamelled; the tail is heterocercal. The figures referred to convey a correct idea of the form and external characters. Beautiful pyritous imprints of Amblypteri occur in the Carboniferous slate of SaarbrÜck, in Lorraine; and fine specimens in the ironstone nodules of the same locality. On the shore at Newhaven, near Leith, similar fossils occur in nodules washed out of the cliffs of coal-shale (Bd. p. 278).

PalÆoniscus. Ly. p. 304.—The fishes of this genus differ from those of Amblypterus in the relatively moderate size of the scales, and the numerous little rays on their margins. They have rhomboidal scales, which in some species are very small, and in others large. They have numerous brush-teeth. Several peculiar species, found in the marl-slates and magnesian limestones of the Permian system, are very widely distributed, occurring in the British Isles, Germany, and the United States.

In some localities the small species occur in groups; on a slab of red sandstone, in the Museum of the Geological Society, from Tyrone, between two and three hundred perfect fishes (P. catopterus) are imbedded on a space not exceeding two feet square.

A remarkable circumstance relating to the fishes of this genus is the almost constant absence of the bodies of the vertebrÆ in otherwise well-preserved specimens, and in which the spinal processes and the ribs are entire: occasionally, however, examples occur with some of the vertebrÆ perfect. An explanation of the above phenomenon may perhaps be found in the probable originally cartilaginous nature of the bodies of the vertebrÆ, and the osseous structure of the enduring apophyses and ribs;[532] while those rare specimens which possess a few bony vertebrÆ may be regarded as exceptions, in which ossification took place in a structure essentially cartilaginous.

[532] Professor Owen states that a similar condition of the spinal column obtains in the fossil Microdonts.—Rep. Brit. Assoc. 1846.

The fishes found in the copper-schists of the Zechstein, at Mansfeld in Saxony, are generally impregnated with copper pyrites, and their scales are as brilliant as burnished gold. These ichthyolites are almost always in contorted and twisted positions; which appearance M. Agassiz attributes to contraction of the muscular tissues after death, during the progress of decomposition, and before the fishes sank down and became imbedded in the mud. (Poiss. Foss. tom. ii. p. 70.)

The fishes of the genus PalÆoniscus are often found in the shales and marls of the Permian and Carboniferous systems of England and Scotland. At East Thickley, in the county of Durham, numerous specimens have been found.[533] The lower Carboniferous strata at Burdie-house, a locality we have before mentioned, have yielded several species of PalÆoniscus, associated with teeth and other remains of large sauroid fishes.[534] On the continent also they prevail in deposits of the same epoch; Eisleben and Mansfeld, iii Saxony, are well-known localities. In North America they have been discovered in strata of probably the same age.[535] In fine, the genera Amblypterus and PalÆoniscus may be regarded as characteristic "medals" of the geological epoch which intervened between the Devonian and Triassic formations.

[533] See Professor Sedgwick on the Magnesian Limestone. Geol. Trans. 2d ser. vol. iii.; and Prof. King’s Monograph on the Permian Fossils, published by the PalÆontographical Society.[534] Dr. Hibbert’s Memoir on the Fossils of Burdie-house.[535] Geology of Massachusetts, by Professor E. Hitchcock.

We will next examine a few genera of the homocercal Lepidoids and Pycnodonts, whose relics are chiefly distributed in the Lias, Oolite, Purbeck, and Wealden.

Lign. 195. Outline of the Dapedius. Lias. (1/2 nat. size).

Dapedius. Lign. 195.—At Lyme Regis, and other productive localities of the fossils of the Lias, large masses of angular enamelled scales, and occasionally entire specimens of the fishes to which they belonged, have for many years been collected. Sir H. De la Beche first scientifically investigated the structure of these Ichthyolites, and pointed out their characters and relations. The Dapedius (of which a restored figure is given in Lign. 195) is a flat, laterally compressed fish, with a rounded head, and fins of moderate size. The body rapidly contracts towards the root of the tail, the fin of which is large and symmetrically lobed. The mouth is furnished with several rows of small conical teeth, which are crenated at their summits, and has brush-teeth on the palatine bones; the jaws are short. The scales are rhomboidal, highly polished, and united laterally by short processes; as in many other ganoid fishes. It belongs to the Lepidoids.

The Tetragonolepis is a Liassic fish, very similar in shape to the Dapedius. It was formerly grouped with the Lepidoidei, but Sir P. Egerton has lately discovered that it essentially differs from those fishes in the character of its scales and teeth, and that it belongs to the Pycnodonts.

Lepidotus.[536] Lign. 186, 196, 197.—Scales of a dark-brown, almost black colour, with a glossy enamelled surface, and of a rhomboidal or lozenge form, and teeth equally dark and glossy, of an obtuse hemispherical figure, are very common in the Wealden strata of the south-east of England and in the Isle of Purbeck. They are called by the quarry-men fishes' scales and eyes. The collectors of the last century used to term the obtuse circular teeth of this and the related genera Bufonites, from a supposition that they were formed in the heads of toads. These relics belong to an extinct genus named Lepidotus, which contains numerous species, that are distributed in the Oolite, Purbeck, and Wealden formations. These fishes resembled the Carps in their general form, but they have no anatomical relations to that family. The body is covered with large rhomboidal scales, which are protected on the external surface by a thick plate of enamel (Lign 196, fig. 3). The lateral line, which is slightly arched, passes direct from the operculum to the middle of the insertion of the caudal fin. The head, and even the face, are cased with osseous and enamelled plates. The bones of the surface of the skull are very large, and are connected by sinuous sutures. The jaws are short and rounded, and furnished with a row of obtuse, conical, circular teeth (see Lign. 197), and several rows of sessile teeth, more or less contracted at the base, which forms a very short pedicle that is anchylosed to the bone. The fossil Lepidoti are found, for the most part, in fluviatile deposits, as in the Purbeck and Wealden strata; and it is probable they inhabited the rivers or sea-coasts, and not deep waters.

[536] Poiss. Foss. tom. ii. p. 233.

Lign. 196. Scales and Fin of Lepidotus Mantelli. Wealden.
Tilgate Forest. (Nat. size.)
Fig. 1.— Scale, with a single process of attachment.
2.— One of the scales of the dorsal line.
3.— Scale (external surface), with a bifurcating process of attachment; the enamelled portion (which alone is visible when the scales are in their natural position on the animal) has longitudinal grooves or folds.
4.— Scale (viewed on the inner surface), having a bifurcating process of attachment and a tooth or projection on each side, to connect the scale laterally with the adjoining scales.
5.— The front ray of the dorsal fin, covered with two rows of enamelled scales, and another ray behind it.

The scales and teeth figured Lign. 196, 197, belong to the larger species of the Wealden. The remains of this fish were first collected in Tilgate Forest, and several teeth and: scales are figured Foss. Til. For. pl. v. and x.; considerable portions of connected scales have since been found; also the head entire, and the fins more or less perfect. A specimen in my collection retained a mass of the scales near the insertion of the tail, a foot wide; indicating the original to have been twelve feet long, and its body three feet broad. The scales are distinguished from other species by the folds or grooves on their enamelled surface; and the teeth by the contracted base, or pedicle, which is a little narrower than the crown (Lign. 197, and Pl. VI. fig. 10). A species (L. Fittoni) closely related to the above is equally abundant in the Weald of Sussex; the scales are not striated, and the teeth have no pedicle.

Lign. 197. Portion of the Jaw of Lepidotus. Wealden. Tilgate Forest. (Nat. size.)
This specimen shows three successional teeth beneath a row of teeth in use.

The intimate structure of the teeth of the Lepidotus is beautifully preserved, and may be easily examined in thin transverse and vertical sections, viewed by transmitted light: see Pl. VI. fig. 10. The dentine is composed of bundles of tubes, continued from the cells of the osseous base, radiating in a vertical direction to the surface of the tooth, as seen in Pl. VI. fig. 10, and giving off branches at an acute angle; but when more highly magnified, the finer branches are seen to be spread out and arched at their extremities, "presenting the appearance of the stems of corn, beaten down by heavy rain."[537]

[537] Odontography, p. 70. See the beautiful representation of this structure, pl. xxxi.

The dorsal and pectoral fins of these fishes are very strong, and consist of several bony rays. There is a double row of acuminated enamelled scales, arranged more or less obliquely, on the anterior margin of the dorsal and anal fins, and on both margins of the caudal: part of the first ray of a dorsal fin, with scales, is represented Lign. 196, fig. 5.

A small species of Lepidotus (A. minor) is common in the Purbeck limestone, and specimens may often be procured from the quarries near Swanage;[538] it has also been found at Hildesheim, in Saxony, by M. Roemer. The detached scales abound in the limestones; and the splendid fossil reptile from Swanage, figured Petrif. Lign. 38, is sprinkled with the scales and minute teeth of this fish.

[538] Fine specimens of this fish are in the British Museum (Petrifactions, p. 429), and in the Museum at Dorchester.

The majority of the species of Lepidotus belong to the Lower Oolites and the Lias. The habits of the Lepidoti, as indicated by the form and structure of the teeth, were those of fishes whose food consisted of crustaceans, shelly mollusca, &c.; for the dental organs are peculiarly adapted for the crushing and grinding of such substances; and the teeth of the adult fishes are generally worn down by use.

Pycnodus. Pl. I. fig. 3; Lign. 194, fig. 3.—The fishes of the family of Pycnodonts, so named from the thickness of their teeth, have an osseous skeleton, a flat body covered with rhomboidal scales, and flat or rounded teeth disposed in several rows on the palatine, vomerine, intermaxillary, and premandibular bones.[539] As in the Lepidotus, these teeth are constructed for crushing, and have generally a smooth, dense, convex or flattened crown, with a highly polished surface. This genus belongs chiefly to the Oolite; it is found also in the Lias, Chalk, and Wealden. A perfect fish of the genus Pycnodus (P. rhombus), from the Jura limestone, at Torre d’Orlando, near Castellamare, is figured in the frontispiece of the first volume of this work; and a vomerine bone, with teeth, from Tilgate Forest, in Lign. 194, fig. 3. In the last fossil there is a median row of flat,, elongated, transversely arched, smooth, glossy teeth, with a double alternate row of small sub-circular teeth on each side, attached to the bone, which is imbedded in Tilgate grit. Specimens of this kind, belonging to one or more species of Pycnodus, occur in the Wealden of Sussex; they were among my earliest discoveries in Tilgate Forest (Foss. Til. For. pl. xvii. figs. 26, 27). Examples are met; with in which all the teeth are shed, and the bony plate of the vomer alone remains.

[539] The intermaxillary, palatine, and vomerine bones compose the vault or roof of the mouth; the vomer occupying the middle; the intermaxillary the front; and the palatine bones the sides; the premandibular bones belong to the lower border of the mouth.

Gyrodus. Lign. 198.—In another genus of the Pycnodonts, termed Gyrodus, the crowns of the teeth are deeply furrowed, the structure of the dentine is very dense, and the pulp-cavity large and simple. One species occurs in the Speeton clay of Yorkshire, and another in the Sussex weald; but the teeth are chiefly found in the Oolite and Chalk. As in Pycnodus, the teeth are distributed in rows on the bones composing the roof, floor, and sides of the mouth.[540]

[540] An extraordinarily perfect lower jaw of a Gyrodus is to be seen in the British Museum (Foss. Brit. Mus. p. 439).

These characters are beautifully displayed in the Russian specimen, Lign. 198. This interesting fossil was presented to me by the late Stephen Cattley, jun. Esq., who collected it in 1839, in a valley near Rjeff, a village on the banks of the Volga. Mr. Cattley informed me "that many fossils are found in that and the neighbouring valleys; and the locality is frequented by Russian geologists when the season permits, which is but seldom, owing to the long duration of the snow, and the heavy rains which accompany the thaw." This specimen consists of the vomerine bone, which is of a coarse texture, and five rows of teeth; the median row consists of very large elliptical teeth; those of the lateral rows are much smaller and arranged alternately. The peculiar structure of the teeth of this genus[541] is finely displayed in this fossil. The ample, deep, and simple pulp-cavity is seen in several teeth, where the crown of dentine has been worn off, filled with a pure white calcareous spar; one of these cavities is marked a. The dentine is extremely dense, consisting of very minute calcigerous tubes, and passes into an external layer of enamel.

[541] Odontography, p. 72.

Lign. 198. Gyrodus Murchisoni[542] (G. A. M.) Oolite? Russia.
(Collected by the late Stephen Cattley, jun. Esq.)
Fig. 1.— The vomerine bone of a fish, with five rows of teeth; seen from above; many of the crowns of the teeth are worn away by use, and the large pulp-cavities, filled with white spar, are exposed; as at a.
2.— Lateral view of the same.
a. One of the pulp-cavities filled with spar.

[542] It is with peculiar pleasure that I inscribe this new species of Gyrodus to Sir R. I. Murchison, in commemoration of those extended and successful geological researches in the Russian empire, which have conferred additional honour on his distinguished name.

The fishes of the genus Gyrodus have the body large, flat, and elevated; the dorsal and anal fins are very long; and the tail is forked, with equal elongated lobes. The scales are laterally connected by strong processes, as in Lepidotus.

Other genera related to the foregoing occur in the Oolite; as for example, Microdon, thus named from the smallness of its very numerous flat angular teeth, arranged in many rows; Placodus, in which the teeth are few, flat, and of great size;[543] and Platysomus (flat-body), with orbicular, clavate, teeth.

[543] Odontography, pl. xliii. fig. 1, and pl. xxx. fig. 2.

In these fishes, also, the dental organs are well adapted for the comminution of shell-fish, and other hard bodies.

Cephalaspides of the Devonian System.—The remains of the three genera of Ganoid fishes that we have now to notice are of a very remarkable character, and are found exclusively in the Devonian or Old Red system; most frequently in Scotland, but also in other parts of the British Isles, and in Europe and America. These fishes agree in one general character, that of having extensive osseous plates, or scutcheons; their general aspect will be understood by reference to Lign. 199, 200, 201. There are no vestiges of the bodies of the vertebrÆ, which, therefore, were probably cartilaginous. These fishes constitute a distinct family with the name Cephalaspides, from the character of the first genus we propose to describe.

Cephalaspis Lyellii. Lign. 199, 200.—The most striking feature in the Ichthyolites of this genus is the enormous scutcheon, or buckler, which forms the head, and is prolonged posteriorly into two lateral horns or points; this part so closely resembles the cephalic shield of certain trilobites (see Lign. 175), that the first found specimens were supposed to be the remains of unknown crustaceans. The name Cephalaspis (buckler-head) is derived from this character. This remarkable appearance is occasioned by the intimate anchylosis of all the bones of the cranium. The body of these fishes is relatively smaller than the head; it has one dorsal fin, and terminates in a tapering tail, supporting a fin. There are two small eyes, placed towards the middle of the head. The body is covered with rhomboidal scales; and the head with discoidal scales, which are highly ornamented with radiated markings[544] (Ly. p. 344, fig. 396). There are four species of Cephalaspis at present known.

[544] Poiss. Foss. tom. ii. p. 135.

The other genera are equally unlike any recent types of the class of fishes. No perfect examples have been found, and some parts of their structure are still unknown; the annexed figures, Lign. 201, have been drawn by Mr. Dinkel (the eminent artist employed by M. Agassiz), with scrupulous accuracy, no part being introduced which is not clearly demonstrated in some one specimen; and the form of the scutcheons is made out very distinctly, to aid the collector in discriminating the detached plates, which are the most common relics of these singular beings.

Pterichthys cornutus.[545] Lign. 201, fig. 1.—This fish is distinguished by its two wing-like lateral appendages; whence the name of the genus (winged-fish). These processes, like the spines on the gill-covers of the common Bullhead (Cottus gobio), are weapons of defence. In some specimens they are extended at right angles to the body (Ly. p. 345, fig. 400).

[545] The first fish of this genus was discovered by Mr. Hugh Miller, in whose charming little work, "The Old Red Sandstone; or, New Walks in an Old Field," will be found a very graphic description of the Old Red fishes; I know not a more fascinating volume on any branch of British geology. Consult also Sir P. Egerton’s elaborate paper on the Pterichthys in the Geol. Journal, vol. iv. p. 302.

The head and anterior part of the body are covered with large angular tuberculated scutcheons. The under surface of the body is flat and protected by five plates, a quadrangular plate occupying the centre. The upper part of the body is convex; the form and disposition of the dorsal scutcheons are shown in Lign. 201, fig. 1. There are two eyes, which are placed in front of the lateral spines: see fig. 1. The tail is of an angular form, and as long as the body; it is covered with scales, and considered by M. Agassiz to have been the only instrument of locomotion. The British species of this genus, of which ten are known, are all very small, varying in length from one to ten inches.

Lign. 201. Fossil Fishes of the Devonian System.
(Drawn by Mr. Joseph Dinkel.)
Fig. 1.— Pterichthys cornutus, seen from above.
2.— Coccosteus oblongus.

These figures are restored with great care, from the best preserved specimens hitherto discovered.

Coccosteus oblongus. Lign. 201, fig. 2.—The fishes of this genus, as may be seen by the lignograph, very much resemble those of Pterichthys; in both the osseous scutcheons of the body are very similarly disposed. In Coccosteus, the head[546] is somewhat rounded; slight rounded notches on the edge of the buckler indicate the place of the eyes on the sides of the head. There is no indication of lateral spines. The tail is very long, covered with scales, and supports a fin. The plates of the body are tuberculated, as in Pterichthys. There are six or eight teeth on each half of the lower jaw (and probably as many on the upper), with a curious group of teeth situated on its symphisis. The teeth are chiefly composed of bone, passing into dentine at their surface.[547]

[546] This is of course only the cranial buckler of the animal, for, as Mr. Hugh Miller observes, "of the true internal skull there remains not a vestige. Like that of the Sturgeon, it must have been a perishable cartilaginous box."—Miller’s Foot-prints, p. 50.[547] Miller, Rep. Brit. Assoc. 1850. Transact. Sect. p. 92. In the Annals of Natural History for November, 1848, Professor M‘Coy has given a corrected outline of the carapace, or bony cephalo-thoracic casing, of the Coccosteus. See also Miller’s Foot-prints, fig. 11.

These fishes are from a few inches to two feet in length; six species have been discovered; and their remains are the most abundant of the Ichthyolites of the Old Red. Patches of detached scales, and isolated osseous plates, are very frequent in the sandy cornstones, and the subcrystalline masses of limestone. These fragments are usually of a brilliant blue or purple colour; and, strongly contrasting with the dull red tint of the surrounding rock, are easily recognised. The colour is supposed to be due to the presence of phosphate of iron, which has communicated a similar tint to the Ichthyolites of the Caithness Schist.[548]

[548] Murch. Sil. Syst. p. 588; see also a detailed description of the Cephalaspis, Holoptychius, and other Devonian Ichthyolites, by M. Agassiz, ibid. p. 589-601.

Fossil Sauroid Fishes. (Poiss. Foss. tom. ii.)—The family of Ganoid, fishes termed Sauroid, or lizard-like, by M. Agassiz, are so named in consequence of certain peculiarities in their organization which are found in no other animals of this class, but exist in reptiles. There are but two living genera; namely, the Lepidosteus, of which there are many species that inhabit the rivers of America; and the Polypterus, that contains two species, one inhabiting the Nile, and the other the rivers of Senegal. In these fishes the bones of the skull are closely connected by sutures; the teeth are large, conical, and longitudinally striated, as in the crocodile, plesiosaurus, &c.; the spinous processes are united to the bodies of the vertebrÆ by suture, as in most reptiles; and the ribs are articulated to the extremities of the transverse processes; the skeleton is osseous. Even in the soft parts many analogies to reptilian structure are seen; thus the Lepidosteus has a glottis, as in the Siren; and a cellular air-bladder, with a tracheal vessel, resembling the lungs of an Ophidian (serpent). These fishes are the only living representatives of those voracious tribes of the most ancient marine fauna, whose remains abound in the Secondary formations. Their relics have often been mistaken for those of reptiles; particularly the teeth, which from their large size, conical figure, enamelled and striated surface, and internal cavity, were generally supposed to belong to crocodiles. The scales are flat, rhomboidal, and parallel to the body. The recent Lepidosteus osseus, of North America, affords a good illustration of the fossil genera; a reduced figure of this fish, from Poiss. Foss., will be found in Bd. pl. xxviia.; and teeth of some fossil Sauroids are represented Bd. pl. xxvii.

The teeth of the Sauroids consist of two kinds; namely, large pointed striated cones, and numerous small brush-teeth. The intricate structure of the conical teeth of the Stony-gar, or Lepidosteus, is very remarkable, and presents some analogy to that observable in the dental organs of the Labyrinthodon, an extinct genus of reptiles, of which we shall treat in a subsequent chapter. The tooth consists of a large conical pulp-cavity, surrounded by a mass of dentine, which is plicated longitudinally, its folds giving to the pulp-cavity an appearance of being divided into parallel longitudinal branches; resembling, in this respect, the base of the tooth of Ichthyosaurus, as shown in a transverse section, Pl. VI. fig. 9. If we imagine these folds to be multiplied, and to have more inflections, and the pulp-cavity to be reduced in its proportions, we shall have the elegant organization of the teeth of the Labyrinthodonts (see Pl. VI. fig. 3b). The dentine is composed of very minute calcigerous tubes, which pass off at right angles from the pulp-cavity to the periphery; and it is covered by a layer of cement, or coarser dentine, which is encased in a coat of enamel, forming the external investment of the tooth.[549] The long conical teeth are implanted in alveoli or sockets, to the walls of which they are anchylosed at their base.

[549] These remarks are based on M. Agassiz’s description and my own observations. An interesting paper, "On the Microscopic Structure of the Teeth of the Lepidostei, and their analogy with those of the Labyrinthodonts, with a plate," by Dr. Jeffries Wyman, will be found in Amer. Journ. of Science, October, 1843, p. 359.

Lepidostei.—This family, having the above described recent Lepidosteus for its type, comprises several genera, and is represented in all the formations from the Tertiary to the Coal-measures inclusive. The Lepidosteus itself has left its remains in the Eocene tertiary of England. The Lepidotus (before described, p. 604,) ranges from the Chalk to the Lias; the Pholidophorus and Dapedius (p. 603) abound in the Lias; the latter being found also in the Wealden, and the former in the Oolite and Purbeck; and the PalÆoniscus (see p. 601) is a well-known Permian and Carboniferous form.

Sauroidei.—The remains of the Sauroids proper occur in the Chalk, Purbeck, Oolite, Lias, Permian, and Carboniferous rocks. The great strength and size of some of these teeth prove that the seas of those remote periods were inhabited by voracious fishes of enormous magnitude. See Petrif. pp. 432, et seq.

The teeth and jaw of a gigantic sauroid (Megalichthys), from the Carboniferous strata at Burdie-house, are figured Bd. pl. xxvii.; the sections of the teeth shown in figs. 13, 14, of that plate, illustrate the size of the pulp-cavity and the thickness of the layer of dentine. These remains were associated with the plants and crustaceans previously described; an assemblage of fossils indicating a lacustrine or estuary formation. Similar teeth have been found in the cannel-coal of Fifeshire.

In the Upper Lias of Ilminster, Somerset, the nodular calcareous rock is rich with the remains of the Pachycormus, many fine specimens of which Mr. C. Moore, of that town, has successfully worked out from their stony encasement, exhibiting the gaping, contorted fish, as it died in the convulsive throes of suffocation in the muddy sea. The little sauroid Leptolepis, of the Lias and the Purbeck, is also abundant in the above mentioned locality.

In the lithographic stone of Solenhofen, and in the Purbeck strata, Oxford Clay, and Lias of England, occur specimens of a sauroid fish remarkable for the extreme shortness of the lower jaw, and the prolongation of the upper into a beak; it is named Aspidorhynchus by Agassiz. The figure of this fossil fish is contrasted on pl. xxviia. Bd. with that of its recent ally, the Lepidosteus.

In the Shanklin sand and in the Galt of Kent and Sussex, large, conical, striated teeth belonging to sauroid fishes are occasionally found. They invariably occur detached, and no portion of the jaws has been observed. In the Chalk of Sussex several fine sauroid fishes have been discovered; such as the Lophiostomus,[550] Belonostomus,[551] and Caturus; the last two of which are found in the Oolite and Lias also. These have been described and figured in the late Mr. Dixon’s "Geology and Fossils of Sussex."

[550] Geol. Surv. Dec. 6. pl. x. xi.[551] Petrif. p. 431.

The Sauroidei-dipterini[552] are found almost exclusively in the Devonian formation. Osteolepis, Diplopterus, and Dipterus are characteristic members of this family. Interesting descriptions and instructive figures of the structure of these genera are given in Mr. Hugh Miller’s late work, "Foot-prints of the Creator, or the Asterolepis of Stromness," at pp. 50 to 61.

[552] The characters of the scales of this and the next family, as well as of the Acanthodei, are succinctly given in Miller’s Foot-prints of the Creator, pp. 30, et seq.

Coelacanthi.—This is a numerous family of sauroid fishes, that have derived their name, hollow-spine, from the central cavity in the fin-rays, which, however, may have had originally cartilaginous cores. They are found from the Devonian to the Cretaceous series. In the former, one of the most remarkable is the genus Holoptychius, distinguished by the peculiar structure of the scales; the enamelled surface of which is covered by undulated furrows. The whole body is covered by thick enamelled scales of this kind. A splendid specimen, twenty-eight inches long, and twelve wide, is figured Murch. Sil. Syst. pl. ii.bis. Scales have been found exceeding three inches in length, by two and a half in width; which must have belonged to a fish of great magnitude. Ly. fig. 395.

In the Old Red Sandstone of Elgin, at a quarry at Scat-craig, some peculiar teeth occur, which possess a very remarkable structure, and have been referred to a genus of sauroid fishes, which, from the dendritical or arborescent disposition of the calcigerous tubes, Prof. Owen has named Dendrodus. These teeth are of a conical form, slightly curved, and solid throughout. On the external surface they are finely striated longitudinally, and have two opposite vertical ridges; the base is rough, and its margin rounded, as if for attachment to a shallow socket. The largest specimen is one and a half inch in length. In thin sections, viewed microscopically by transmitted light, there is a central pulp-cavity, of small size; the medullary canals pass into a few short ramifications, like the branches of a shrub, and these are distributed into irregular dilatations, simulating leaves, which resolve themselves into radiating bundles of calcigerous tubes; a portion of a transverse section[553] is shown Pl. VI. fig. 8.

[553] Odontography, pl. lxii. B fig. 2; and Cycl. Anat. Art. Teeth.

Lign. 202. Asterolepis. Devonian. (1/2 nat. size)
Inner side of portion of the lower jaw.
(After Miller.)
ASTEROLEPIS.

In Mr. H. Miller’s charming work just referred to we have a full and clear account of the singular fossil fish the Asterolepis. Remains of this gigantic Ganoid were first found in Russia.[554] Its name is derived from the stellate markings on the dermal plates of the head, which are of great size, and form a strong expanded buckler, the orbits of the eyes being situated near the anterior border. (See Miller’s Asterolepis, pp. 74, et seq. figs. 27-29.) Lign. 202 shows a part of the lower jaw of this fish, seen on the inside. Along the upper margin are seen a "thickly set row of small broadly-based teeth,"—these are ordinary fish-teeth; and behind this edge-row of small teeth, b, there occur "a thinly set row of huge reptile-teeth, based on an interior platform of bone, which formed the top of the cartilage enclosing box composing the jaw." (Miller.) These large teeth, a a, are longitudinally striated, and generally bear two sharp lateral cutting edges.[555]

[554] Casts of the fossil bones from Russia are in the British Museum; Petrif. p. 435.[555] The microscopic structure of both kinds of teeth is elegantly figured in Mr. Miller’s work, pp. 81, 82.

Macropoma Mantelli. Wond. p. 348. (Foss. South D. tab. xxxvii. xxxviii.; Petrif. p. 436, Lign. 89.)—This Coelacanth fish is from one to two feet in length, of an elongated fusiform shape, with a large head and two dorsal fins; the anterior fin is imbedded, and has seven or eight strong spinous rays, the first two of which have numerous spines. The opercula are very long and large (hence its name); the scales[556] are garnished with adpressed spines, disposed in semicircular rows (see Lign. 185, fig. 2). The teeth are small, conical, and numerous.

[556] See Prof. Williamson’s Memoir, Philos. Trans. 1849, p. 435; pl. xliii. figs. 27, 28.

Several specimens of this fish are almost perfect. The bones of the cranium, the jaws, teeth, opercula, branchial rays, palatine arches, the surface of the body covered with scales, all the fins, the pelvic bones, the vertebrÆ and their apophyses, all remain.

In one example, the vomer, covered with minute teeth, is exposed. But the most extraordinary fact relating to these Ichthyolites, is the preservation, in every specimen, of the air-bladder;[557] even its membranes remain, and separate in flakes; and the ramification of the minute vessels is visible under a high magnifying power. In some instances this bladder is displaced and much distended; but in general it occupies its natural position, and retains its elongated, sub-cylindrical form, with a few annular constrictions or folds.

[557] See Williamson, op. cit. pp. 462-165, and figs. 29, 30.

COPROLITES. COLOLITES.

Coprolites. Lign. 139, figs. 1, 2.—In more than one example the solid earthy residue of digestion, in small lumps or pellets, of a conical form and spirally convoluted, lies in the abdomen of these fossil fishes. Fossil excrementitious substances of this kind are termed Coprolites (Bd. p. 198, pl. xv.); they occur in many deposits, and belong not only to fishes, but to large reptiles and other animals. Lign. 139, p. 432, fig. 1, represents the coprolite of a Macropoma; and fig. 2, that of a species of Shark, from Hamsey. The convoluted appearance of these bodies arises from the peculiar organization of the intestinal canal of the original fishes, in which, as in the recent Dog-fish, a portion of the intestine was spirally twisted, the tube forming several gyrations; and the passage of the calcareous substance through this constricted canal gave rise to the structure observable in the coprolites. In the Macropoma the gyrations appear to have been few; seldom more than five or six turns being apparent. In the fossil Sharks the convolutions are more numerous, ten or twelve occurring in the length of an inch. In many of the coprolites, the impression of the mucous or lining membrane of the intestinal canal may be detected. Some of the coprolites of the Macropoma are not convoluted; probably from having occupied the upper part of the digestive tube, and therefore not having been moulded in the spiral part. (See Geol. S. E. p. 145. Foss. South D. tab. ix.) Minute scales and bones of fishes are occasionally imbedded in the substance of the coprolites, affording evidence of the carnivorous habits of the Macropoma.

Cololites. Bd. pl. xva—It will be convenient to notice in this place those curious fossils which occur in detached masses in the limestone of Solenhofen, and used to be known to collectors by the term lumbricaria, from the supposition that they were petrified earth-worms. An excellent representation of a fine specimen is given by Dr. Buckland in the plate referred to above. These convoluted bodies M. Agassiz, with his wonted sagacity, has ascertained to be the intestines of fishes; and has therefore named them Cololites. Although generally found isolated, specimens occur in which they are imbedded, like the coprolites of the Macropoma, in the abdominal region of fishes. The frequent occurrence of the Cololites apart from the body, is explained by the usual process of decomposition in fishes. M. Agassiz remarks that dead fish always float on the surface of the water with the belly uppermost, until the abdomen bursts from distention. The small intestines are then expelled by the evolved gases through the aperture, and soon become detached from the body. I have observed indistinct traces of similar remains in the beds of chalk in which fossil fishes most prevail. Dr. Buckland mentions the discovery, by Lord Greenock, of a mass of petrified intestines distended with coprolite, and surrounded by the scales of a fish, in a block of coal-shale from the neighbourhood of Edinburgh (Bd. p. 199).

Dercetis elongatus. Wond. p. 349.—Before proceeding to the investigation of examples of the next order, I will describe a highly interesting Ichthyolite, which in a mutilated state is extremely common in some of the chalk strata of the South-east of England; it is noticed in Foss. South D. p. 232. This fish is placed by M. Agassiz in his family of ganoidians, termed Scleroderms; and he mentions that another species has been found in the chalk of Westphalia. The Dercetis has a very elongated body, with a short head terminating in a pointed beak; the upper jaw is a little longer than the lower, and both jaws are armed with long, conical, elevated teeth, and several rows of very small ones. On each side of the fish there are three rows of osseous scutcheons like those of the Sturgeon (see Wond. p. 349); the body was also covered with numerous small scales. From the form of the body somewhat resembling that of the eel, being very long, and sub-cylindrical in uncompressed examples, the specimens are generally called "petrified eels" by the quarry-men. The examples usually found consist of the elongated body, more or less compressed, and irregularly covered with patches of scales confusedly intermingled; among which traces of the scutcheons may sometimes be distinguished. These specimens occasionally exceed two feet in length, by one or two inches in breadth; with neither extremity perfect, and without any vestige of the fins.[558] The example figured Wond. Lign. 74, is the only instance in which I have seen the cranium perfect. The scutcheons in the Westphalian species have a prominent longitudinal ridge or keel, and their surface finely granulated; they are so large that the whole body of the fish is covered with them.

[558] See Foss. South D. pl. xl. fig. 2, and pl. xxxiv. figs. 10 and 11.

CTENOID FISHES.

Fossil Ctenoid Fishes (Poiss. Foss. tom. iv.).—The fishes of this order have imbricated laminated scales, the posterior margins of which are round and finely pectinated; i. e. divided into little teeth, like a comb. These scales are nearly circular, but more or less elongated; and, as the laminÆ of which they are composed successively diminish from the lowermost to the uppermost, the pectinated margin of each being apparent, the surface is very scabrous; the front edge is sinuous. The common Perch is the type of the Ctenoidians. The teeth of these fishes are invariably small, and either villous or brush-like.

From the numerous fossil genera I select, in illustration of the characters of this order, the Beryx; of which four species occur in the English Chalk, and three others in the Chalk of Bohemia and Westphalia. Of this genus, which is closely related to the Perch (Perca), two living species inhabit the seas of Australia. The bones of the skull have dentated crests; the dorsal fin has spinous rays in front, which are united to the soft rays; the margin of the caudal fin has little spinous rays.

The Beryx is one of the most ancient representatives of the Perch tribe, and of the Ctenoid order.

Beryx Lewesiensis.[559] Wond. p. 351; Petrif. Lign. 90.—This is one of the most common of the Ichthyolites of the Chalk of the South-east of England; it is called "Johnny Dory" by the quarry-men; the specimens are from six to twelve inches long. It occurs also in the Chalk of Westphalia. The outline of the perfect form of this species, Wond. p. 351, by Mr. Dinkel, conveys an accurate idea of its external characters. It has one dorsal fin, with several spinous rays in front of the soft ray. The head is very large, and the opercular pieces are ornamented with sculptured rays; the margins of the jaws are covered with a broad band of brush-teeth. The orbit is large, and often contains the capsule (sclerotica) of the eye. The rays of the gills are short and thick, five are preserved in some examples. The scales are very large; about twenty-five in the median row; their posterior margins have several concentric rows of spines (see Lign. 185, fig. 3, p. 567). The lateral line is often distinctly apparent, in the form of a tube, contracted behind and expanded in the centre of the scale. The vertebral column is composed of large short vertebrÆ, with very long apophyses; the ribs are slight.

[559] The fossil discovered by me, and figured in Foss. South D. tab. xxxvi. was the first perfect fish obtained from the Chalk. This fish was first described by me, Foss. South D. tab. xxxv. xxxvi. as Zeus Lewesiensis; M. Agassiz has very properly referred it to the genus Beryx; but he has also substituted another specific name; which is wholly unwarrantable, for that first imposed ought to be retained; see p. 518, note.

Beryx superbus.—This is a larger species, sometimes thirteen inches long, with very large and broad scales. It has been found in the lower chalk at Lewes. See Dixon’s Foss. Sussex, tab. xxxvi. fig. 5.

Beryx radians. Wond. p. 350.—This species is smaller, and relatively longer, than B. Lewesiensis; it generally occurs in the Chalk-marl, and is invariably of a very dark colour, the scales having a polished or glossy aspect. The scales are small, with a simple row of diverging spines on the posterior edge. The scales of the lateral line are peculiar; the mucous canal is not formed of a series of simple tubular cylinders, as in B. Lewesiensis, but is divided into several branches, as may be seen with a lens of moderate power. There are more than thirty scales in the length of the lateral line.

Beryx microcephalus (Poiss. Foss. tom. iv. tab. ivc.; and Dixon, Foss. Sussex, tab. xxiv. fig. 3).—This fish is distinguished by its slender form, and the extreme smallness of the head, as the name implies. The scales have one row of very thick spines on the posterior margin; they are more elevated, and shorter than in B. radians; those of the lateral line are pierced by an elongated conical tube, and are not ramified as in the last species. This ichthyolite, like the B. radians, occurs in the Chalk-marl, and in a similar state of mineralization.

Smerdis minutus. Lign. 203.—A pretty ctenoidian fish, from one to three inches long, about the dimensions of a perch a year old, is very common in the marls of Aix in Provence, Wond. p. 260; and many are often found grouped together in every variety of position. This species is characterised by the elevated anterior rays of the dorsal, and the wide and very forked caudal fin.

Several ctenoidian and cycloidian fishes have been found in the north of the Brazils, by Mr. Gardiner, in strata probably of the Cretaceous epoch.

Fossil Cycloid Fishes. (Poiss. Foss. tom. v.)—This order comprises the fishes possessing scales of a cycloid, or circular, form, with smooth margins, and composed of plates of horn or bone, without enamel. It contains numerous families, including the Scaroids, or Parrot-fishes, and the Scomberoids, or Mackerel tribe, which are Acanthopterygians, the Lucioids, or Pikes, Clupeoids, or Herrings, Salmonoids, or Salmon tribe, and the Cyprinoids, or Carps, which are Malacopterygians, as well as other families. The fossil remains of this order are exceedingly numerous, particularly in the Tertiary and upper Secondary deposits. A genus of SalmonidÆ, discovered in the White Chalk of Sussex, will serve to exemplify the characters of the fossil cycloidian fishes.

Lign. 203. Smerdis minutus. Eocene. (nat. size.)
Aix in Provence.

Osmeroides. Plate II. and Wond. p. 344, 347.—Two species of this genus occur in the Chalk, near Lewes; and principally, if not exclusively, in the Lower Chalk, without flints. They are exceedingly beautiful Ichthyolites, and are almost invariably found with the body but little compressed; the fish, in many examples, is as round and perfect as when living. The entire cranium, the opercula and branchial rays, and all the fins are preserved in some examples. These fishes belong to the Salmon family,[560] and are nearly related to the Smelt (Osmerus); whence the name of the genus. There are two species, easily distinguishable. The first (O. Mantelli, Pl. II.) has a short, sub-cylindrical body, and seldom exceeds eight or nine inches in length; the other (O. Lewesiensis) has an elongated and elliptical body, and sometimes attains a length of fourteen inches. The dorsal fin too in this species has more rays than in the other. The fossil figured in Pl. II.. is a very remarkable specimen of the first species. It is nine inches in length; and the chalk has been cleared away, so as to expose the entire fish, six inches in relief above the surface of the block, Petrif. Lign. 92, p. 445. The fish is lying on its back, with the mouth open, and the opercula, or gill-covers, and the branchial arches expanded; the pectoral and ventral fins, and the dorsal fin, are in their natural position; the five rays of the dorsal are erect; of the caudal fin, or tail, but slight indications remain. There is but one dorsal fin; but in a specimen of O. Lewesiensis there is a trace of the little adipose process observable between the dorsal fin and the tail, as in the recent species of SalmonidÆ. A magnified view of one of the scales is represented Lign. 185, fig. 4, p. 567.

[560] They were first described by me in Foss. South D. p. 235, tab. xxxiii. and xl. as Salmo Lewesiensis.

Of the Cyprinoids, or fishes of the Carp family (Malacopterygians), the recent species of which are inhabitants either of fresh-water, or the brackish waters of the mouths of rivers, many fossil species occur in the fluviatile and lacustrine deposits of the Tertiary formations. In their character of omnivorous fishes, the Carps then, as now, formed the principal mass of the finny population of the lakes, and in their turn served as food to the carnivorous tribes, as the pikes, eels, &c. Several species are found in a beautiful state in the schists of Œningen, and in the Tertiary marls at Aix. Many of the layers of marl at the latter locality are covered with groups of fishes of the family Cyprinodonts, the recent species of which are of a small size, and inhabit the fresh-water lakes of temperate zones. Lign. 184, p. 562, represents a portion of a large slab of marl in the cabinet of Sir R. Murchison, which is covered with scores of a species resembling a recent fish (Lebias) in the profile of its head, and the form of its fins. It is named Lebias cephalotes, from the relative largeness of its head. The black appearance of the abdomen in many of these Ichthyolites indicates the original situation of the intestines and of the liver, which is largely developed in the fishes of this family, and contains much colouring matter.

Saurocephalus and Saurodon. Lign. 204.—In the same quarry, near Lewes, from which the first entire fish of the Sussex Chalk was obtained, teeth of a very peculiar character were, many years since, occasionally discovered.[561] These teeth are of a lanceolate form, much compressed; with entire, sharp edges, terminating in a point; the fang is single, and broad; the surface of the crown is glossy, and marked with fissures filled with chalk (see Lign. 204, fig. 1). Teeth of this kind, attached to portions of the jaw, were subsequently found in the Chalk at Brighton and Lewes. Similar remains were collected from the Cretaceous marls of Missouri and New Jersey, in the United States. The American specimens comprised two closely allied genera, which, from the supposition that the fossils were the relics of reptiles, were respectively designated Saurocephalus and Saurodon.[562] Examples of the teeth and jaws of both genera have been discovered in the Sussex Chalk (see Lign. 204).

[561] Foss. South D. tab. xxxiii. p. 228.[562] American Phil. Trans, vol. iii. new series, pl. xvi. on the Saurodon, by Dr. Hays; and Journal Acad. Sciences, Philadelphia, vol. iii. on the Saurocephalus, by Dr. Harlan.

Lign. 204. Fossil Teeth and Jaws of Fishes. Chalk. Sussex.
Fig. 1.— Tooth of Saurocephalus lanciformis. Lewes.
2.— Teeth of Saurocephalus striatus. Brighton. Portion of the jaw, with five teeth.
3.— Fragment of a jaw, with two perfect teeth, and the base of another, of Saurodon Leanus. Kemptown, Brighton.
4.— Enchodus halocyon. Left branch of the lower jaw, with teeth; and one front tooth of the opposite portion. Lewes.

M. Agassiz retains the names imposed by the American naturalists, and has placed these genera in the family of Scomberoids (Mackerel, Swordfish). They belong to the Pharyngognathi of Muller. The teeth are disposed in a single row, and fixed in deep sockets by a simple root, or fang, which is frequently somewhat excavated by the pressure of a successional tooth. In Saurodon Leanus the crown of the tooth is angular, and barbed, and supported on a sub-cylindrical shank, or stem (see Lign. 204, fig. 3). The microscopical structure of these teeth presents that peculiar reticulated disposition of the medullary canals throughout the entire body of the tooth, which is only found in the dental organs of fishes.

Hypsodon Lewesiensis. (Foss. South D. tab. xlii.)—The Sussex and Kentish Chalk also contain the remains of a very large fish, belonging to the Pharyngognathi, with extremely upright, long, conical, compressed, pointed teeth, which, like those of the Saurodon, are implanted in sockets. These teeth are commonly of a delicate fawn colour externally and of a dark brown internally; having a large simple pulp-cavity. In Foss. South D. (tab. xlii.) are represented portions of an intermaxillary and jaw-bone with teeth; a vertebra, deeply biconcave; and a large bone, apparently a branch of the os hyoides; all found in the same block of chalk.[563]

[563] A magnificent specimen (now in the British Museum) displays, on the same slab of chalk, a large portion of the cranium, teeth, several vertebrÆ, ribs, and many other bones, belonging to a fish of considerable magnitude. Petrif. p. 444.

Enchodus (sword-tooth) halocyon. Lign. 204, fig. 4. (Poiss. Foss. tom. v. tab. xxvc.)—The specimen figured is a portion of the lower jaw, with one row of elongated, conical, slightly curved, pointed teeth; the two anterior teeth being much longer and larger than the others; it affords a good illustration of the dental organs of Enchodus; a genus of Acanthopterygian fishes, the jaws and teeth of which are often found in the Sussex Chalk. The teeth are of various sizes, and attached by anchylosis, one row on the premandibular bone, and another irregular row of smaller teeth to the inside of the lower jaw. The two anterior teeth are very large, and of a peculiar form: their base is wide and solid, and the shank of the tooth is suddenly contracted immediately above, and becomes elongated into a point. These teeth are generally of a dark colour, have a glossy aspect, and are very brittle; differing so remarkably in this respect from the shark’s teeth, with which they are usually collocated, that mere fragments can be readily identified. The external surface of the lower jaw is marked with finely granulated, longitudinal ridges or striÆ.[564]

[564] A fine example of the lower jaw, with twelve teeth, is figured Foss. South D. tab. xli. and another, with the upper jaw and teeth, Geol. S. E. p. 140. Beautiful figures of the remains of Saurocephalus, Enchodus, Hypsodon, and many other fine Chalk fishes, are given in Dixon’s Fossils of Sussex, 4to. 1850.

Mr. Toulmin Smith, of Highgate, has in his Museum a portion of the lower jaw with fifteen teeth of a small individual, imbedded in the centre of a flint nodule, from Gravesend, which was discovered by accidentally breaking the stone. The bone of the jaw and the teeth are of a dead white colour, and appear not to be in the slightest degree silicified; but in those teeth which are broken the pulp-cavity is filled with quartz, which must have transuded through the walls of the teeth.

Ichthyolites of recent species.—The distinguished naturalist to whose labours in fossil Ichthyology we have been so largely indebted, states, that of the many hundred species submitted to his notice, but one can be identified with any fish now living. This conclusion must, however, be received with some reservation; for, among the fossil genera, founded on the teeth, there are species which certainly cannot be distinguished from recent forms. And in the diluvial drift at Breslau, associated with the bones of the fossil elephant (Elephas primigenius), the remains of a pike, closely resembling the common European species, have lately been discovered.[565]

[565] Agassiz, Poiss. Foss. tom. v. p. 68.

The exception above alluded to, is a little Malacopterygian fish, rather larger than a Sprat, called the Capelan (Mallotus villosus), which inhabits the banks of Newfoundland, and other parts of the coasts of the northern seas. Fossil specimens of this fish.[566] occur in nodules of indurated marl or clay, on the coast of Greenland.[567] It is supposed that these Ichthyolites are of very recent date: and that similar fossils are in the progress of formation.

[566] See Poiss. Foss. tom. v. pl. lx., in which the skeleton of the recent fish, and specimens of the fossil species, are represented.[567] Similar fossils have been obtained from the "Drift" on the Saco River, thirty miles north of Portsmouth, New Hampshire. See Lyell’s Second Visit to the United States, vol. i. p. 29.

Ichthyopatolites, or imprints of the pectoral fin-rays of certain fishes. Under this name Dr. Buckland described certain problematical markings observed on a flag-stone from a coal-pit at Mostyn, in Flintshire, and now in the Geological Society’s Museum. It consists of curvilinear scratches or imprints, disposed symmetrically at regular intervals on each side a smooth level space, about two inches wide, which may correspond to the body of a fish, the pectoral fins of which Dr. Buckland suggests were the instruments by which the markings in question were formed.

These scratches follow each other in nearly equidistant rows of three in a row, and at intervals of about two inches from the point of each individual scratch to the points of those next succeeding and preceding it; they are slightly convex outwards, three on each side the median space, or supposed track of the body of the fish. Dr. Buckland, in the memoir referred to, shows that these markings cannot be referable to the imprint of the feet or claws of reptiles, and points out the structure of the bony anterior rays of the pectoral fins, as in certain Siluroid and Lophoid fishes, and in the Climbing Perch (Anabas scandens), or the Hassar (Doras costata), and refers also to the ambulatory movements of the common Gurnard, in corroboration of this opinion.[568]

[568] Proceedings of Geol. Society, vol. iv. p. 204.


Geological Distribution of Fossil Fishes.—From the incidental notices of the geological habitats of the fossil fishes enumerated in our survey of this class of beings, the reader cannot fail to have remarked, that the most recent strata abounded in forms related to the inhabitants of the existing seas and rivers; while the most ancient teemed with species and genera of families altogether extinct, or of prodigious rarity in the recent fauna.

In general terms, it may be stated, upon the authority of M. Agassiz, that the Ichthyolites of the Tertiary deposits approach in their characters to the living genera, but all the species are extinct. The newer Tertiary, as the Crag, contain genera common to tropical seas, as the large sharks (Carcharias), and eagle-rays (Myliobates), &c. In the Eocene, or most ancient Tertiary, as the London and Paris basins, Monte Bolca, &c., many of the Ichthyolites are closely related to recent genera. Of the Chalk fishes, a few only are of recent genera, but the majority are still allied to Tertiary forms. In the Chalk, the Pharyngognathi, Acanthopteri, and Malacopteri are met with as new types; and indications of the HybodontidÆ, Sauroidei, and Coelacanthi (the last derived from the Devonian, and the other two from the Carboniferous Limestone) appear for the last time.

The ichthyic fauna of the Cretaceous deposits is closely related by the majority of its family groups with that of the series of strata from the Lias to the Wealden, inclusive. In and above the Lias all the ganoid fishes are homocercal. Below the Lias, the genera and species are far more removed from existing types, and almost all are heterocercal.

Of the eight thousand living fishes known to naturalists, three-fourths belong to the Cycloid and Ctenoid orders, and of these no species are known below the Chalk; the other fourth is referable to the Placoids and Ganoids, of which there are comparatively but few existing species. Yet fishes of these two orders almost solely flourished during the ancient Secondary formations; for below the Lias, the predominant recent orders are altogether absent. Beneath the Coal, true carnivorous fishes, with trenchant teeth, are almost unknown; but omnivorous species, with either brush or obtusely conical teeth, and great sauroid fishes, are the prevailing representatives of the class.[569] In fine, the Ichthyolites of the different formations constitute two grand groups, which have their boundary line at the base of the Cretaceous deposits. The first and most ancient comprises the Ganoids and Placoids; the second, more intimately related to existing types, comprehends forms more diversified; these are principally Ctenoid and Cycloid, with a small number of the two preceding orders, which insensibly disappear; and their few living analogues are very distinct from the ancient species. Now, although deductions of this nature may require to be modified with the progress of knowledge, yet the generalizations thus obtained are founded on so vast an accumulation of facts and observations, as to render it improbable that they will be materially invalidated by future discoveries; for they remarkably accord with the results derived from the investigation of the fossil remains of all the other classes of animals. The most modern deposits contain the remains of animals allied to the existing species; the most ancient, of forms altogether extinct, or of excessive rarity in the recent faunas. The discovery of existing species, or genera, in the most ancient strata, would modify, but not destroy, the inferences deduced from the facts hitherto obtained; and every geologist is prepared to find that such may be the case.

[569] In the several chapters on the different formations, as arranged in the Wonders, the student will find succinct notices of the distribution of the genera of fishes throughout the fossiliferous deposits. A list of the Chalk species known in 1848 is given at pp. 356-359, Wond.

Thus of the Sharks, with triangular notched teeth, which are so common in the Tertiary formations, and were formerly unknown in the ancient Secondary, one representative has been found in the Carboniferous system (see p. 595). But, if teeth of this type should hereafter be discovered in every Secondary deposit, the great preponderance of these fishes over the Sauroid in the Tertiary, and in the existing seas, would not be the less remarkable.


On Collecting and Developing Fossil Fishes.—From what has been advanced, the reader will have obtained a general knowledge of the fossil remains of this class that are likely to be met with in particular deposits. Thus, he will expect to find the teeth of large sharks and rays in the Tertiary clays and sands; and skeletons and perfect specimens of numerous Ctenoid and Cycloid fishes in the laminated marls and fine limestones of the same formations. In the Chalk, with numerous teeth of sharks, he may discover splendid examples of Cycloid and Ctenoid fishes; and, in the Wealden, large Ganoidian forms. Passing to the ancient Secondary strata, the extraordinary buckler-headed and Sauroid fishes will arrest his attention; and their vestiges will be found, more or less perfect, in the shales and limestones, and in the indurated nodules of clay and sandstone.

The detached teeth of fishes in Tertiary sands and clays may be easily obtained entire, and should be arranged in the same manner as the shells (see p. 442), either in trays, or on boards. The triangular teeth, with lateral denticles, must be carefully extracted, so as to preserve those appendages on which the specific and generic distinctions of many Ichthyolites depend. M. Agassiz particularly recommends the preservation of all the specimens collected together in the same locality, as many may probably belong to the same individual, and thus the dental organization of the original be determined. Teeth collected from the same stratum in different places, should not, therefore, be mixed together. Several series of the same kind of teeth should be preserved, and as many as possible of each kind; for specimens apparently identical may prove to be highly instructive as a series. I have often had occasion to regret the disposal of supposed duplicates, in my earlier researches, which would have tended to elucidate the characters of those specimens which were retained.

The Ichthyolites, and their detached teeth and fins, in the Chalk and other soft limestones, may be cleared by means of a penknife or graver and small sharp chisels. It is preferable to leave the teeth attached to small blocks of the chalk; as in the examples, figured Lign. 193. But to develop the beautiful Chalk Ichthyolites, particularly those of the Osmeroides, Macropoma, &c. some practice and considerable dexterity are required. The compressed fishes, as the Beryx, like those in the Tertiary limestones, often lie in the sedimentary plane of the stone, and may be sufficiently exposed, by a blow of a hammer or a pick, to show the nature of the fossil, and admit of being easily developed. But the fishes with sub-cylindrical bodies very commonly split asunder in a transverse direction: and those with spinous scales, as the Macropoma, adhere so firmly to the chalk, that, to display the external surface of their scales, the surrounding stone must be removed piecemeal, in the manner described for the Chalk crustaceans (see p. 544). The collector who sees the splendid Chalk fishes in the British Museum,[570] and learns that they were found in the Chalk of Kent and Sussex, will be grievously disappointed, upon visiting the quarries from which they were obtained, if he expects to discover specimens with any considerable portion of the scales, or body, exposed. It was many years before the quarry-men acquired the tact they now possess, of detecting, from very slight evidence, the presence of an Ichthyolite in a block of chalk: patches of scales, which the quarry-men called "bran," and detached sharks’ teeth, "birds beaks," and "snakes' tongues," and teeth of Ptychodus, "slugs," being the only remains of fishes generally observed and laid aside by the workmen.

[570] Petrifactions, pp. 441, 444.

The fossil Salmon or Smelt (see p. 626), which may be considered as one of the most extraordinary of the Chalk fishes found in England, affords an excellent illustration of the mode of developing the Ichthyolites of this formation. This interesting fossil is delineated on a small scale, in three different states, in Plate II.; and affords a good practical lesson for the young collector. Among some blocks of chalk which a recent fall in one of the quarries near Lewes had brought to light, was a large mass split asunder, and exposing on each corresponding surface an irregular oval marking of a yellowish brown colour; this appearance is represented Pl. II. fig. 1. Presuming that these markings were produced by a transverse section of the body of a fish, the two blocks were trimmed into a portable size, and accurately cemented together with very hot, thin, fresh glue. When consolidated, some of the chalk was chiselled off in the supposed longitudinal direction of the enclosed fish, and part of the body, covered with scales, was exposed, as Pl. II. fig. 2. With the view of ascertaining the extent of the Ichthyolite, some of the surrounding stone was then removed towards each extremity of the block, and traces of the fish were discovered, as shown in the same figure. The task of completely developing the fossil was thus rendered comparatively easy; the chalk was chiselled, cut, and scraped away, till the perfect fish, as seen in fig. 3, was developed.[571] The block was then reduced to a convenient size, and the edges sawn smooth. The chalk is easily cut with a carpenter’s saw; the instrument should be short and strong, and the teeth of moderate size.

[571] The figure in Pl. II. is too small to convey an accurate idea of this Ichthyolite, which is now in the British Museum; see Petrifactions, pp. 445, 446. M. Agassiz’s figure very inaccurately represents the original. A beautiful lithograph of this fish, by Mr. Pollard, of Brighton, was published in the Catalogue of the Mantellian Museum, 1836.

When a portion of the body of an Ichthyolite of this kind is found in a block of chalk, and the fracture of the block appears to be recent, diligent search should be made for the corresponding piece; for it may probably be found to contain the other part of the fish. A splendid specimen of Osmeroides Lewesiensis, more than a foot long, was thus obtained. The quarry-men, in a block of chalk which a recent fall had thrown down, discovered a few inches of the caudal portion of the body of a fish; on the broken surface of the stone, a section of the body was distinctly seen, as in the specimen previously described. Search was made among the fallen masses for the corresponding piece, but without success. Upon observing the face of the quarry exposed by the recent fall, on a projecting block, many yards above our reach, a discoloured spot was indistinctly seen, and it was conjectured that this might prove to be the other moiety of the Ichthyolite. The workmen were directed to preserve this block if possible; but it remained in situ several months, and until the rock was again blasted; when the stone so long coveted rolled away from the fallen mass, and fortunately was soon discovered. It proved to be the corresponding portion of the fish; with the head, opercula, branchial arches, pectoral fins, and the anterior part of the body covered with beautiful cycloid scales. In the preparation of fossils of this kind, glue as the cement, and a paste made of plaster of Paris with thin glue, to fill up the crevices and strengthen the block, are the materials I have employed. The fossil remains of fishes in other rocks require to be extracted and developed in the manner previously directed for the Echinoderms, Cephalopoda, &c. (pp. 332, 497.)

The collector may be reminded, that Otolithes, or ear-stones (p. 574), are found in the Crag of Norfolk, and other Tertiary strata; and that Coprolites, associated with minute scales, bones, &c. of small fishes, constitute, in some localities, layers of considerable thickness and of great extent. The "bone-bed" of the Lias, near Westbury, and that of the Ludlow series on the banks of the Teme, near Ludlow,[572] are well-known examples of such a deposit.

[572] See Mr. Strickland’s interesting notice of the distribution and contents of this "bone-bed," in the Quart. Geol. Journ. vol. ix. p. 8

Microscopical Examination.—A few words on the microscopical examination of the remains of fishes may be useful. The structure of the large, and the forms of the minute scales, may be seen by a common lens, and without preparing the specimens. But for the examination of the intimate organization of scales, teeth, &c. the microscope is required; and the method directed for the investigation of flint (p. 373) should be employed. The scales, portions of the membranes of the air-bladder, stomach, &c. and thin chips of the teeth, rendered temporarily transparent by oil of turpentine, or permanently so by Canada balsam, should be viewed by transmitted light. But the intricate structure of the dental organs, the medullary canals, and the calcigerous tubes, cannot be successfully investigated without the aid of the lapidary, or the adoption of the process described at page 67 for the preparation of fossil wood for microscopical examination.

BRITISH LOCALITIES OF FOSSIL FISHES.

? The detached teeth, scales, vertebrÆ, &c. of fishes are so extensively distributed, that there is scarcely a cliff or quarry of fossiliferous rock in Great Britain, that does not contain some examples. The following list of localities must, therefore, be regarded as merely directing the student to a few places, in which particular fossils of this class have been discovered.

Abergavenny. Mt. L. Teeth of Psammodus, Orodus, &c.

Armagh, Ireland. Mt. L. Numerous teeth and spines.

Arundel, Sussex. Cret. Quarries in the neighbourhood; beautiful Chalk fishes.

Aust Cliff, near Westbury, Somersetshire. Lower Lias. Pholidophorus, &c. Base of Lias. In a layer called the bone-bed, containing bones, scales, teeth, and Coprolites of fishes. Teeth of Ceratodus, &c.

Axmouth. Base of Lias: Bone-bed. Numerous scales, bones, and teeth. Saurichthys, &c.

Barrow-on-Soar. Lias. Dapedius.

Bracklesham Bay, Sussex. Eocene. Magnificent specimens of Rays, as Myliobatis, AËtobatis, and of ChimÆroids were collected by the late F. Dixon, Esq., and are now in the British Museum.

Brighton. Cret. Chalk quarries in the vicinity. Beryx, Dercetis, Saurocephalus, Saurodon, and the common species of teeth, &c.

Bristol. Mt. L. The usual species of Psammodus, Orodus, Onchus, &c.

Burdie-house, near Edinburgh. Carb. PalÆoniscus, Megalichthys, Holoptychius, &c.

Caithness, Scotland. Old Red. Dipterus, &c.

Charing, Kent. Many fishes in the Chalk.

Chatham, Kent. Cret. Beryx, Hypsodon, and the usual teeth, &c.

Cheltenham. Base of Lias. In the bone-bed teeth, scales, Coprolites.

Clayton, Sussex. Lower Chalk. Beryx microcephalus, and other rare Ichthyolites.

Clifton, near Bristol. Mt. L. Psammodus, Orodus, &c.

Cromarty, Scotland. Old Red. Coccosteus, Pterichthys, &c.

Cuckfield, Sussex. Wealden. Lepidotus, Hybodus, Acrodus.

Cullercoats, Durham. Permian. PalÆoniscus, &c.

Dinton, Vale of Wardour. Purbeck. Leptolepis, Ceramurus, &c.

Downton Hall, near Ludlow. Devonian. Cephalaspis, Dipterus, &c. U. Sil. In a quarry on the banks of the Teme, a fish-bed composed of scales, teeth, and Coprolites, in Upper Ludlow limestone.

Dudley. Sil. Ichthyodorulites.

Dungannon, Ireland. Permian. Quarry at Rhone-hill; numerous small PalÆonisci, P. catopterus.

East Thickley, Durham. Magnesian Limestone. PalÆonisci.

Glammis, Forfarshire. Devon. Cephalaspis, Gyrolepis, Dipterus.

Gravesend and Northfleet. Chalk-pits rich in fish-teeth, &c.

Hastings. Wealden. Lepidotus, Hybodus.

Ilminster, Somerset. Upper Lias. Pachycormus and Leptolepis.

Leeds, Middleton Quarry. Carb. Layers of fish-coal, abundance of remains of Megalichthys, Holoptychius, &c. (Geol. Proc. iii. p. 153.)

Lewes, Sussex. Cret. All the fishes of the British Chalk. See Wond. pp. 356-359.

Lyme Regis. Lias. Dapedius, Hybodus, Squaloraia; and numerous other species and genera.

Newhaven, near Leith. Carb. On the shore, nodules of ironstone with fishes and Coprolites. Amblypterus, PalÆoniscus.

Sheppey, Isle of. Tert. Numerous teeth of Rays, Sharks, &c., and other Ichthyolites in great abundance.

Shotover, near Oxford. Kimmeridge Clay. Ischyodus, Hybodus, &c.

Southend, Essex. Eocene. Fish-bones and teeth (Pisodus, &c.) are found on the shore along the foot of the cliff.

Speeton, Yorkshire. Galt. Macropoma Egertoni; and many other fishes.

Steyning, Sussex. Cret. In the marl-pits, Coprolites and teeth of Sharks are abundant.

Stonesfield. Great Oolite. Hybodus, Lepidotus, Leptacanthus, &c.

Swanage. Purbeck. Lepidotus, Hybodus, Ophiopsis, &c.

Thurso, Scotland. Devonian. Asterolepis, &c.

Westbury, near Bristol. Base of Lias. Bone-bed with numerous remains.

Worthing. Cret. Beautiful Chalk fishes in the neighbouring quarries.

FOREIGN LOCALITIES.

? Although the present work is expressly designed as a guide to the British collector, I am induced to subjoin a few foreign localities of Ichthyolites, that lie within the reach of the continental tourist. A detailed account of the most celebrated sites is given by M. Agassiz, Poiss. Foss.

Aix, in Provence. Tertiary. Some of the beds of gypseous marl contain numerous species in abundance.

Eisleben, Upper Saxony. Permian. Numerous Ichthyolites in dark shale.

Glaris, Switzerland. Cret. Immense numbers of fishes in dark schist. The specimens are often contorted, from the contraction of their bodies, during decomposition.

Maestricht (St. Peter’s Mountain). Upper Cret. Numerous teeth, vertebrÆ, &c. of fishes of the Cretaceous epoch. See Wond. p. 309. Mansfeld, in Thuringia. Permian. Fishes in copper-slate, in great numbers; many extremely beautiful.

Monte Bolca, or Vestena Nova. Tert. The richest mine of Ichthyolites in the world. A catalogue of the numerous genera and species found in this celebrated locality, is given in Poiss. Foss. tom. iv. pp. 33-52.[573] See Wond. p. 265.

Mount Lebanon, Asia. Tert. Numerous Ichthyolites, in great perfection.

Œningen. Tert. fresh-water. Many kinds of fishes of the same genera as those which inhabit the great European lakes; as the Perch, Salmon, Eel, Pike, Carp, &c. A list of these Ichthyolites will be found in Poiss. Foss. tom. ii. part ii. p. 78. See Wond. p. 263.

SaarbrÜck, in Lorraine. Carb. Amblypterus, and other Carboniferous fishes.

Seefeld, in the Tyrol; on the principal road from Insbruck to Munich. Lias. Abundance of fish in bituminous slate.

Stabia, Italy, at Torre d’Orlando, near Castellamare. Oolite. Beautiful fishes in fissile limestone.

Solenhofen. Oolite. Numerous Ichthyolites; many in great perfection. See Wond. p. 513.

[573] It is necessary to caution the collector against the frauds practised by the quarry-men, and dealers in fossils, at this and other celebrated foreign localities. Specimens, apparently perfect, are ingeniously constructed from the fragments of various examples. The head of one fish, the body of another, decorated with the fins of a third, and perhaps the tail of a fourth, of different species, or even genera, are dove-tailed together, coloured, and varnished, so as to deceive the common observer, and, occasionally, even the experienced collector. Sponging the specimens with cold water will often detect the imposition; for the colour if artificial will be removed, or rendered paler, while the same process will heighten the natural tints. At Pappenheim, Solenhofen, and other places, where fossil crustaceans, as Shrimps, Prawns, &c. are found in such perfection, the imprints of good specimens are often coloured, and offered for sale; a wet sponge will speedily detect the imposture.


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

Clyx.com


Top of Page
Top of Page