George Wither, born in 1588, therefore about the same age as Giles Fletcher, was a very different sort of writer indeed. There could hardly be a greater contrast. Fancy, and all her motley train, were scarcely known to Wither, save by the hearing of the ears. He became an eager Puritan towards the close of his life, but his poetry chiefly belongs to the earlier part of it. Throughout it is distinguished by a certain straightforward simplicity of good English thought and English word. His hymns remind me, in the form of their speech, of Gascoigne. I shall quote but little; for, although there is a sweet calm and a great justice of reflection and feeling, there is hardly anything of that warming glow, that rousing force, that impressive weight in his verse, which is the chief virtue of the lofty rhyme. The best in a volume of ninety Hymns and Songs of the Church, is, I think, The Author's Hymn at the close, of which I give three stanzas. They manifest the simplicity and truth of the man, reflecting in their very tone his faithful, contented, trustful nature. By thy grace, those passions, troubles, Those afflictions and those terrors, Those base hopes that would possess me, He has written another similar volume, but much larger, and of a somewhat extraordinary character. It consists of no fewer than two hundred and thirty-three hymns, mostly long, upon an incredible variety of subjects, comprehending one for every season of nature and of the church, and one for every occurrence in life of which the author could think as likely to confront man or woman. Of these subjects I quote a few of the more remarkable, but even from them my reader can have little conception of the variety in the book: A Hymn whilst we are washing; In a clear starry Night; A Hymn for a House-warming; After a great Frost or Snow; For one whose Beauty is much praised; For one upbraided with Deformity; For a Widower or a Widow delivered from a troublesome Yokefellow; For a Cripple; For a Jailor; For a Poet. Here is a portion of one which I hope may be helpful to some of my readers. WHEN WE CANNOT SLEEP.What ails my heart, that in my breast Let not vain hopes, griefs, doubts, or fears, In vain that soul attempteth ought, On thee, O Lord, on thee therefore, Forgive thou me, that when my mind And, gracious God, vouchsafe to grant, Before examining the volume, one would say that no man could write so many hymns without frequent and signal failure. But the marvel here is, that the hymns are all so very far from bad. He can never have written in other than a gentle mood. There must have been a fine harmony in his nature, that kept him, as it were. This peacefulness makes him interesting in spite of his comparative flatness. I must restrain remark, however, and give five out of twelve stanzas of another of his hymns. A ROCKING HYMN.Sweet baby, sleep; what ails my dear? Whilst thus thy lullaby I sing, A little infant once was he, Within a manger lodged thy Lord, Thou hast, yet more to perfect this, I think George Wither's verses will grow upon the reader of them, tame as they are sure to appear at first. His Hallelujah, or Britain's Second Remembrancer, from which I have been quoting, is well worth possessing, and can be procured without difficulty. We now come to a new sort, both of man and poet—still a clergyman. It is an especial pleasure to write the name of Robert Herrick amongst the poets of religion, for the very act records that the jolly, careless Anacreon of the church, with his head and heart crowded with pleasures, threw down at length his wine-cup, tore the roses from his head, and knelt in the dust. Nothing bears Herrick's name so unrefined as the things Dr. Donne wrote in his youth; but the impression made by his earlier poems is of a man of far shallower nature, and greatly more absorbed in the delights of the passing hour. In the year 1648, when he was fifty-seven years of age, being prominent as a Royalist, he was ejected from his living by the dominant Puritans; and in that same year he published his poems, of which the latter part and later written is his Noble Numbers, or religious poems. We may wonder at his publishing the Hesperides along with them, but we must not forget that, while the manners of a time are never to be taken as a justification of what is wrong, the judgment of men concerning what is wrong will be greatly influenced by those manners—not necessarily on the side of laxity. It is but fair to receive his own testimony concerning himself, offered in these two lines printed at the close of his Hesperides: To his book's end this last line he'd have placed: Jocund his muse was, but his life was chaste. We find the same artist in the Noble Numbers as in the Hesperides, but hardly the same man. However far he may have been from the model of a clergyman in the earlier period of his history, partly no doubt from the society to which his power of song made him acceptable, I cannot believe that these later poems are the results of mood, still less the results of mere professional bias, or even sense of professional duty. In a good many of his poems he touches the heart of truth; in others, even those of epigrammatic form, he must be allowed to fail in point as well as in meaning. As to his art-forms, he is guilty of great offences, the result of the same passion for lawless figures and similitudes which Dr. Donne so freely indulged. But his verses are brightened by a certain almost childishly quaint and innocent humour; while the tenderness of some of them rises on the reader like the aurora of the coming sun of George Herbert. I do not forget that, even if some of his poems were printed in 1639, years before that George Herbert had done his work and gone home: my figure stands in relation to the order I have adopted. Some of his verse is homelier than even George Herbert's homeliest. One of its most remarkable traits is a quaint thanksgiving for the commonest things by name—not the less real that it is sometimes even queer. For instance: God gives not only corn for need, Here is another, delightful in its oddity. We can fancy the merry yet gracious poet chuckling over the vision of the child and the fancy of his words. A GRACE FOR A CHILD.Here a little child I stand, I shall now give two or three of his longer poems, which are not long, and then a few of his short ones. The best known is the following, but it is not so well known that I must therefore omit it. HIS LITANY TO THE HOLY SPIRIT.In the hour of my distress, When I lie within my bed, When the house doth sigh and weep, When the artless doctor sees without skill. When his potion and his pill, When the passing-bell doth toll, When the tapers now burn blue, When the priest his last hath prayed, When God knows I'm tossed about, When the tempter me pursu'th When the flames and hellish cries When the judgment is revealed, THE WHITE ISLAND, OR PLACE OF THE BLEST.In this world, the Isle of Dreams, But when once from hence we fly, In that whiter island, where There no monstrous fancies shall There, in calm and cooling sleep Pleasures such as shall pursue TO DEATH.Thou bid'st me come away; ETERNITY.O years and age, farewell! And these mine eyes shall see Where never moon shall sway THE GOODNESS OF HIS GOD.When winds and seas do rage, A mighty storm last night What need I then despair TO GOD.Lord, I am like to mistletoe, Here are now a few chosen from many that—to borrow a term from DIVINE EPIGRAMS.God, when he's angry here with any one, * * * * * God can't be wrathful; but we may conclude * * * * * 'Tis hard to find God; but to comprehend * * * * * God's rod doth watch while men do sleep, and then * * * * * A man's trangression God does then remit, * * * * * God, when he takes my goods and chattels hence, * * * * * Humble we must be, if to heaven we go; * * * * * God who's in heaven, will hear from thence, * * * * * The same who crowns the conqueror, will be * * * * * God is so potent, as his power can that. * * * * * Paradise is, as from the learn'd I gather, * * * * * Heaven is not given for our good works here; * * * * * One more for the sake of Martha, smiled at by so many because they are incapable either of her blame or her sister's praise. The repetition of the name, made known And so farewell to the very lovable Robert Herrick. Francis Quarles was born in 1592. I have not much to say about him, popular as he was in his own day, for a large portion of his writing takes the shape of satire, which I consider only an active form of negation. I doubt much if mere opposition to the false is of any benefit. Convince a man by argument that the thing he has been taught is false, and you leave his house empty, swept, and garnished; but the expulsion of the falsehood is no protection against its re-entrance in another mask, with seven worse than itself in its company. The right effort of the teacher is to give the positive—to present, as he may, the vision of reality, for the perception of which, and not for the discovery of falsehood, is man created. This will not only cast out the demon, but so people the house that he will not dare return. If a man might disprove all the untruths in creation, he would hardly be a hair's breadth nearer the end of his own making. It is better to hold honestly one fragment of truth in the midst of immeasurable error, than to sit alone, if that were possible, in the midst of an absolute vision, clear as the hyaline, but only repellent of falsehood, not receptive of truth. It is the positive by which a man shall live. Truth is his life. The refusal of the false is not the reception of the true. A man may deny himself into a spiritual lethargy, without denying one truth, simply by spending his strength for that which is not bread, until he has none left wherewith to search for the truth, which alone can feed him. Only when subjected to the positive does the negative find its true vocation. I am jealous of the living force cast into the slough of satire. No doubt, either indignant or loving rebuke has its end and does its work, but I fear that wit, while rousing the admiration of the spiteful or the like witty, comes in only to destroy its dignity. At the same time, I am not sure whether there might not be such a judicious combination of the elements as to render my remarks inapplicable. At all events, poetry favours the positive, and from the Emblems named of Quarles I shall choose one in which it fully predominates. There is something in it remarkably fine. PHOSPHOR, BRING THE DAY.Will't ne'er be morning? Will that promised light How long, how long shall these benighted eyes * * * * * Let those whose eyes, like owls, abhor the light— Alas! my light-in-vain-expecting eyes Blow, Ignorance. O thou, whose idle knee |