Propulsion by paddle-wheels. — Manner of driving them. — Marine Engine. — Its form and arrangement. — Proportion of its cylinder. — Injury to boilers by deposites and incrustation. — Not effectually removed by blowing out. — Mr. Samuel Hall's condenser. — Its advantages. — Originally suggested by Watt. — Hall's steam saver. — Howard's vapour engine. — Morgan's paddle-wheels. — Limits of steam navigation. — Proportion of tonnage to power. — Average speed. — Consumption of fuel. — Iron steamers. — American steam raft. — Steam navigation to India. — By Egypt and the Red Sea to Bombay. — By same route to Calcutta. — By Syria and the Euphrates to Bombay. — Steam communication with the United States from the west coast of Ireland to St. John's, Halifax, and New York.

(114.) Among the various ways in which the steam engine has ministered to the social progress of our race, none is more important and interesting than the aid it has afforded to navigation. Before it lent its giant powers to that art, locomotion over the waters of the deep was attended with a degree of danger and uncertainty, which seemed so necessary and so inevitable, that, as a common proverb, it became the type and representative of everything else which was precarious and perilous. The application, however, of steam to navigation has rescued the mariner from much of the perils of the winds and waves; and even in its actual state, apart from the improvements which it is still likely to receive, it has rendered all voyages of moderate length as safe and as regular as journeys over land. We are even now upon the brink of such improvements as will probably so extend the powers of the steam engine, as to render it available as the means of connecting the most distant points of the earth.

The manner in which the steam engine is commonly applied to propel vessels must be so familiar as to require but short explanation. A pair of wheels, like common under-shot water-wheels, bearing on their rims a number of flat boards called paddle boards, are placed one at each side of the vessel, in such a position that when the vessel is immersed to her ordinary depth the lowest paddle boards shall be submerged. These wheels are fixed upon a shaft, which is made to revolve by cranks placed upon it, in the same manner as the fly-wheel of a common steam engine is turned. It is now the invariable custom to place in steam vessels two engines, each of which works a crank: these two cranks are placed at right angles to each other, in the same manner as the cranks already described upon the working axles of locomotive engines. When either crank is at its dead point, the other is in full activity, so that the necessity for a fly wheel is superseded. The engines may be either condensing or high-pressure engines; but in Europe the low-pressure condensing engine has been invariably used for nautical purposes. In the United States, where steam navigation had its origin, and where it was, until a recent period, much more extensively practised than in Europe, less objection was felt to the use of high-pressure engines; and their limited bulk, their small original cost, and simplicity of structure, strongly recommended them, more especially for the purposes of river navigation.

(g.) The original type of nearly all the engines used in steam navigation was that constructed at Soho by Watt and Bolton for Mr. Fulton, and first used by him upon the Hudson river. This had the beam below the piston-rod as in the English boat-engines, but the cylinder above deck, as in the American. From this primitive form, the two nations have diverged in opposite directions. The Americans, navigating rivers, and having speed for their principal object, have not hesitated to keep the cylinder above deck, and have lengthened the stroke of the piston in order to make the power cut on a more advantageous point of the wheel. Compactness has been gained by the suppression of the working beam.

On the other hand, the English, having the safe navigation of stormy seas as their more important object, have shortened the cylinder in order that the piston-rod may work wholly under the deck, and the arrangement of Fulton's working beam has been retained by them. In this way there can be no doubt, that they have lost the power of obtaining equal speed from a given expenditure of power, and those conversant in the practice and theory of stowing ships may well doubt whether security is not also sacrificed.—A. E.

The arrangement of the parts of the maritime engine differs in some respects, from that of the land engine. Want of room renders greater compactness necessary; and in order to diminish the height of the machine, the working beam is transferred from above the cylinder to below it. In fact, there are two beams, one at each side of the engine, which are connected by a parallel motion with the piston, the rods of the parallel motion extending from the lower part of the engine to the top of the piston-rod. The working end of the beam is connected with the crank by a connecting rod, presented upwards instead of downwards, as in the land engine. The proportion of the length and diameters of the cylinders differ from those of land engines for a like reason: to save height, short cylinders with large diameters are used. Thus, in an engine of 200 horse-power, the length of the cylinder is sometimes 60 inches, and its diameter 53 inches: the valves and the gearing which work them, the air-pump, condenser, and other parts of the machine, do not differ materially from those already described in the land engines.

(h.) The action of machinery may be rendered more equable by using two engines, each of half the power, instead of a single one. If one of these be working with its maximum force when the other is changing the direction of its motion, the result of their joint action will be a force nearly constant. Such a combination was invented by Mr. Francis Ogden, and has been used in several steam boats constructed under his directions. It would however be far more valuable in other cases, particularly where great uniformity in the velocity is indispensable.

This method has now become almost universal in the engines used in the English steam boats, each of which has usually two, both applied to the same shaft, and therefore capable of being used singly or together to turn the paddle wheels. In the American steam boats, although two engines have been often applied, each usually acts upon no more than one of the wheels. We can see no other good reason for this, than that our engineers do not wish to be thought to copy Mr. Ogden.—A. E.

The nature of the work which the marine engine has to perform, is such, that great regularity of action is neither necessary nor possible. The agitation of the surface of the sea will cause the immersion of the paddle-wheels to vary very much, and the resistance to the engine will undergo a corresponding change: the governor, and other parts of the apparatus already described, contrived for imparting to the engine that extreme regularity which is indispensable in its application to manufactures, are therefore here omitted; and nothing is introduced except what is necessary to maintain the engine in its full working power.

It is evident that it must be a matter of considerable importance to reduce the space occupied by the machinery on board a vessel to the least possible dimensions. The marine boilers, therefore, are constructed so as to yield the necessary quantity of steam with the smallest practical dimensions. With this view a much more extensive surface in proportion to the size of the boiler is exposed to the action of the fire. In fact, the flues which carry off the heated air to the chimney are conducted through the boiler, so as to act upon the water on every side in thin oblong shells, which traverse the boiler backward and forward repeatedly, until finally they terminate in the chimney. By this arrangement the original expense of the boilers is very considerably increased; but, on the other hand, their steam-producing power is also greatly augmented; and from experiments lately made by Mr. Watt at Birmingham, it appears that they work with an economy of fuel compared with common land boilers in the proportion of about two to three. Thus they have the additional advantage of saving the tonnage as well as the expense of one third of the fuel.

One of the most formidable difficulties which has been encountered in applying the steam engine to the purposes of navigation has arisen from the necessity of supplying the boiler with sea water, instead of pure fresh water. This water (also used for the purpose of condensation) being injected into the condenser and mixed with the condensed steam, is conducted as feeding water into the boiler.

The salt contained in the sea water, not being evaporated, remains in the boiler. In fact, it is separated from the water in the same manner as by the process of distillation. As the evaporation in the boiler is continued, the proportion of salt contained in the water is, therefore, constantly increased, until a greater proportion is accumulated than the water is capable of holding in solution; a deposition of salt then commences, and is lodged in the cavities at the bottom of the boiler. The continuance of this process, it is evident, would at length fill the boiler with salt.

But besides this, under some circumstances, a deposition of lime[35] is made, and a hard incrustation is formed on the inner surface of the boiler. In some situations, also, sand and mud are received into the boiler, being suspended in the water pumped in for feeding it. All these substances, whether deposited in a loose form in the lower parts of the boiler or collected in a crust on its inner surface, form obstructions to the passage of heat from the fire to the water. The crust thus formed is not unfrequently an inch or more in thickness, and so hard that good chisels are broken in removing it. The heat more or less intercepted by these substances collects in the metal of the boiler, and raises it to a temperature far exceeding that of the water within. It may even, if the incrustation be great, be sufficient to render the boiler red-hot. These circumstances occasion the rapid wear of the boiler, and endanger its safety by softening it.

The remedy which has generally been adopted to remove or diminish these injurious effects consists in allowing a stream of hot water continually to flow from the boiler, and supplying from the feed-pipe a corresponding portion of cold water. While the hot water which flows from the boiler in this case contains, besides its just proportion of salt, that portion which has been liberated from the water converted into vapour, the cold water which is supplied through the feed-pipe contains less than its just proportion of salt, since it is composed of the natural sea water, mixed with the condensed steam, which latter contains no salt. In this manner, the proportion of the salt in the boiler may be prevented from accumulating; but this is attended with considerable inconvenience and loss. It is evident that the discharge of the hot water, and the introduction of so considerable a quantity of cold water, entails upon the machine a great waste of fuel, and, consequently, renders it necessary that the vessel should be supplied with a much larger quantity of coals than are merely necessary for propelling it. In long voyages, where this inconvenience is most felt, this is a circumstance of obvious importance. But besides the waste of fuel, the speed of the vessel is diminished by the rate of evaporation in the boiler being checked by the constant stream of cold water flowing into it. This process of discharging the water, which is called blowing out, is only practised occasionally. In the Admiralty steamers, the engineers are ordered to blow out every two hours. But it is more usual to do so only once a day.

This method, however, of blowing out furnishes but a partial remedy for the evils we have alluded to: a loose deposite will perhaps be removed by such means, but an incrustation, more or less according to the circumstances and quality of the water, will be formed; besides which, the temptation to work the vessel with efficiency for the moment influences the engine men to neglect blowing out; and it is found that this class of persons can rarely be relied upon to resort to this remedy with that constancy and regularity which are essential for the due preservation of the boilers. The class of steam vessels which, at present, are exposed to the greatest injury from these causes are the sea-going steamers employed by the Admiralty; and we find, by a report made by Messrs. Lloyd and Kingston to the Admiralty, in August, 1834, that it is admitted that the method of blowing out is, even when daily attended to, ineffectual. "The water in the boiler," these gentlemen observe, "is kept from exceeding a certain degree of saltness, by periodically blowing a portion of it into the sea; but whatever care is taken, in long voyages especially, salt will accumulate, and sometimes in great quantities and of great hardness, so that it is with difficulty it can be removed. Boilers are thus often injured as much in a few months as they would otherwise be in as many years. The other evil necessarily resulting from this state of things is, besides the rapid destruction of the boilers, a great waste of fuel, occasioned by the difficulty with which the heat passes through the incrustation on the inside, by the leaks which are thereby caused, and by the practice of blowing out periodically, as before mentioned, a considerable portion of the boiling water."

It would be impracticable to carry on board the vessel a sufficient quantity of pure fresh water to work the engine exclusively by its means. To accomplish this, it would be necessary to have a sufficient supply of cold water to keep the condensing cistern cold, to supply the jet in the condenser, and to have a reservoir in which the warm water coming from the waste pipe of the cold cistern might be allowed to cool. Engineers have therefore directed their attention to some method by which the steam may be condensed without a jet, and after condensation be preserved for the purpose of feeding the boiler. If this could be accomplished, it would not be necessary to provide a greater quantity of pure water than would be sufficient to make up the small portion of waste which might proceed from leakage and from other causes; and it is evident that this portion might always be readily obtained by the distillation of sea water, which might be effected by a small vessel exposed to the same fire which acts upon the boiler.

(115.) Mr. Samuel Hall of Basford, near Nottingham, has taken out patents for a new form of condenser, contrived for the attainment of these ends, besides some other improvements in the engine.

The condenser of Mr. Hall consists of a great number of narrow tubes immersed in a cistern of cold water: the steam as it passes from the cylinder, after having worked the piston, enters these tubes, and is immediately condensed by their cold surfaces. It flows in the form of water from their remote extremities, and is drawn off by the air-pump, and conducted in the usual way to a cistern from which the boiler is fed. In the marine engines constructed under Mr. Hall's patents, the tubes of the condenser being in an upright or vertical position, the steam flows from the cylinder into the upper part of the condenser, which is a low flat chamber, in the bottom of which is inserted the upper extremities of the tubes, through which the steam passes downwards, and as it passes is condensed. It flows thence into a similar chamber below, from whence it is drawn off by the air-pump.

It is evident that at sea an unlimited supply of cold water may be obtained to keep the condensing cistern cold, so that a perfect condensation may always be effected by these tubes, if they be made sufficiently small. The water formed by the condensed steam will be pure distilled water; and if the boiler be originally filled with water which does not hold in solution any earthy or other matter which might be deposited or encrusted, it may be worked for any length of time without injury. The small quantity of waste from leakage is supplied in Mr. Hall's engine by a simple apparatus in which a sufficient quantity of sea water may be distilled.

The following are the advantages, as stated by Mr. Hall, to be gained by his condenser:—

1. A saving of fuel, amounting in some cases to so much as a third of the ordinary consumption.

2. The preservation of the boilers from the destruction produced in common engines by the corrosive action of sea or other impure water, and by encrustations of earthy matter.

3. The saving of the time spent in cleaning the boilers.

4. A considerable increase of power, owing to the cleanness of the boilers; the absence of injected water to be pumped out of a vacuum; the greater perfection of the vacuum; the better preservation of the piston and valves of the air-pump; and (by another contrivance of his) the more perfect lubrication of the parts of the engine.

5. The water in the boiler being constantly maintained at the same height by self-acting arrangement.

6. The size of a boiler exerting a given power, being much smaller than the common kind, owing to its more perfect action.

Messrs. Lloyd and Kingston were employed by government to examine and report the effects of Mr. Hall's boilers, and they stated in their report, already referred to, that the result is so successful as to leave nothing to be wished for. Among the advantages which they enumerate are the increased durability of the engines; the prevention of accidents through carelessness, or otherwise, arising from the condenser and air-pump becoming choked with injection water; and the additional security against the boilers being burnt in consequence of the water being suffered to get too low. But the greatest advantages, compared with which they consider all others to be of secondary importance, are the increased durability of the boilers and the saving of fuel.

About 16 engines, built either wholly upon Mr. Hall's principle or having his condenser attached to them, have now (October, 1835) been working in different parts of England, and on board different vessels for various periods, from three years to three months; and it appears from the concurrent testimony of the proprietors and managers of them, that they are attended with all the advantages which the patentee engaged for. The part of the contrivance the performance of which would have appeared most doubtful would have been the maintenance of a sufficiently good vacuum in the condenser, in the absence of the usual method of condensation by the injection of cold water; nevertheless it appears that a better vacuum is sustained in these engines than in the ordinary engines which condense by jet. The barometer-gauge varies from 29 to 29-1/2 inches, and in some cases comes up to 30 inches, according to the state of the barometer: this is a vacuum very nearly perfect, and indeed may be said to be so for all practical purposes. The Prince Llewellyn and the Air steam packets, belonging to the St. George Steam Packet Company, have worked such a pair of these engines for about a year. The City of London steam packet, the property of the General Steam Navigation Company, has been furnished with two fifty-horse engines, and has worked them during the same period. In all cases the boilers have been found perfectly free from scale or incrustation; and the deposite is either absolutely nothing or very trifling, requiring the boiler to be swept about once in half a year, and sometimes not so often. The trial which has been made of these engines in the navy has proved satisfactory, so far as it has been carried. The Lords of the Admiralty have lately ordered a pair of seventy-horse engines to be constructed on this principle for a vessel now (October, 1835) in process of construction;[36] and another vessel in all respects similar, except having copper boilers, is likewise ordered; so that a just comparison may be made. It would, however, have been more fair if both vessels had been provided with iron boilers, since copper does not receive incrustation as readily as iron.

It would seem that the advantages of these boilers in the vessels of the St. George Steam Packet Company were regarded by the directors as sufficiently evident, since, after more than a year's experience, they are about to place a pair of ninety-horse engines of this kind in a new and powerful steamer called the Hercules.

Engines furnished with Mr. Hall's apparatus have not yet, so far as I am informed, been tried with reference to the power exerted by the consumption of a given quantity of fuel. The mere fact of a good vacuum being sustained in the condenser cannot by itself be regarded as a conclusive proof of the efficiency of the engine, without the water or air introduced by a condensing jet. Mr. Hall, nevertheless, uses as large an air-pump as that of an ordinary condensing engine, and recommends even a larger one. For what purpose, it may be asked, is such an appendage introduced? If there be nothing to be removed but the condensed steam, a very small pump ought to be sufficient. It is not wonderful that a good vacuum is sustained in the condenser, if the power expended on the air-pump is employed in pumping away uncondensed steam. Such a contrivance would be merely a deception, giving an apparent but no real advantage to the engine. Having mentioned these advantages, which are said to arise from Mr. Hall's condenser, it is right to state that it is in fact a reproduction of an early invention of Mr. Watt. There is in possession of James Watt, esquire, a drawing of a condenser laid before parliament in 1776, in which the same method of condensing without a jet is proposed. Mr. Watt, however, finding that he could not procure by that means so sudden or so perfect a vacuum as by injection, abandoned it. I believe he also found that the tubes of the condenser became furred with a deposite which impeded the process of condensation. It would seem, however, that Mr. Hall has found means to obviate these effects. It is right to add, that Mr. Hall, in his specification, distinctly disclaims all claim to the method of condensing by tubes without jet.

There is another part of Mr. Hall's contrivance which merits notice. In all engines, a considerable quantity of steam is allowed to escape from the safety valve. Whenever the vessel stops, the steam, which would otherwise be taken from the boiler by the cylinders, passes out through this valve into the atmosphere. Also, whenever the cylinders work at under-power, and do not consume the steam as fast as it is produced by the boiler, the surplus steam escapes through the valve. Now, according to the principle of Mr. Hall's method, it is necessary to save the water which thus escapes in vapour, since otherwise the pure water of the boiler would be more rapidly wasted. Mr. Hall accordingly places a safety valve of peculiar construction in communication with a tube which leads to the condenser, so that whenever, either by stopping the engine or diminishing its working power, steam accumulates in the boiler, its increased pressure opens the safety valve, and it passes through this pipe to the condenser, where it is reconverted into water, and pumped off by the air-pump into the cistern from which the boiler is fed.

The attainment of an object so advantageous as to extend the powers of steam navigation, and to render the performance of voyages of any length practicable, so far as the efficiency of the machinery is concerned, has naturally stimulated the inventive genius of the country. The preservation of the boiler by the prevention of deposite and incrustation is an object of paramount importance; and its attainment necessarily involves, to a certain degree, another condition on which the extension of steam voyages must depend, viz. the economy of fuel. In proportion as the economy of fuel is increased, in the same proportion will the limit to which steam navigation may be carried be extended.

(116.) A patent has been obtained by Mr. Thomas Howard of London for a form of engine possessing much novelty and ingenuity, and having pretensions to the attainment of a very extraordinary economy of fuel, in addition to those advantages which have been already explained as attending Mr. Hall's engines. In these engines, as in Mr. Hall's, the steam is constantly reproduced from the same water, so that pure or distilled water may be used; but Mr. Howard dispenses with the use of a boiler altogether. The steam also with which he works is in a state essentially different from the steam used in ordinary engines. In these, the vapour is raised directly from the water in a boiling state, and it contains as much water as it is capable of holding at its temperature. Thus, at the temperature of 212°, a cubic foot of steam used in common engines will contain about a cubic inch of water; but in the contrivance of Mr. Howard, a considerable quantity of heat is imparted to the steam before it passes into the cylinder in addition to what is necessary to maintain it in the vaporous form.

A quantity of mercury is placed in a shallow wrought-iron vessel over a coke fire, by which it is maintained at the temperature of from 400° to 500°. The surface exposed to the fire is three fourths of a square foot for each horse-power. The upper surface of the mercury is covered by a very thin plate of iron, which rests in contact with it, and which is so contrived as to present about four times as much surface as that exposed beneath to the fire. Adjacent to this a vessel of water is placed, kept heated nearly to the boiling-point, which communicates by a nozzle and valve with the chamber or vessel immediately above the mercury. At intervals corresponding to the motion of the piston, a small quantity of water is injected from this vessel, and thrown upon the plate of iron which rests upon the hot mercury: from this it receives the heat necessary not only to convert it into steam, but to expand that steam, and raise it to a temperature above the temperature it would receive if raised in immediate contact with water. In fact, the steam thus produced will have a temperature not corresponding to its pressure, but considerably above that point, and it will therefore be in circumstances under which it will part with more or less of its heat, and allow its temperature to be lowered without being even partially condensed, whereas steam used in the ordinary steam engines must be more or less condensed by the slightest diminution of its temperature. The quantity of liquid injected into the steam chamber must be regulated by the power at which the engine is intended to work. The fire is supplied with air by a blowing machine, which is subject to exact regulation. The steam, produced in the manner already explained, passes into a chamber which surrounds the working cylinder; and this chamber itself is enclosed by another space, through which the air from the furnace must pass before it reaches the flue. In this way it imparts its redundant heat to the steam which is about to work the cylinder, and raises it to a temperature of about 400°; the pressure, however, not exceeding 25 lbs. per square inch. The arrangement of valves for the admission of the steam to the cylinder is such as to cause the steam to act expansively.

The vacuum on the opposite side of the piston is maintained by condensation in the following manner:—The condenser is a copper vessel placed in a cistern constantly supplied with cold water, and the steam flows to it from the cylinder by an eduction pipe in the usual way: a jet is admitted to it from an adjacent vessel, which, before the engine commences work, is filled with distilled water; the condensing water and condensed steam are pumped from the condenser by air-pumps of the usual construction, but smaller, inasmuch as there is no air to be withdrawn, as in common engines. The warm water thus pumped out of the condenser is driven into a copper pipe or worm, which is carried with many coils through a cistern of cold water, so that when it arrives at the end of this pipe it is reduced to the common temperature of the atmosphere. The pipe is then conducted into the vessel of distilled water already mentioned, and the water flowing from it continually replaces the water which flows into the condenser through the condensing jet. The condensing water being purged of air, a very small air-pump is sufficient; since it has only to exhaust the condenser and tubes at starting, and to remove whatever air may enter by casual leakage. The patentee states that the condensation takes place as rapidly and as perfectly as in the best steam engine, and it is evident that this method of condensation is applicable even where the mercurial generator already described may not be employed. The vessel from which the water is injected into the mercurial generator is likewise fed by the air-pump connected with the condenser. There is another pipe besides the copper worm already described, which is carried from the hot well to this vessel, and the water is of course returned through it without being cooled. This vessel is likewise sufficiently exposed to the action of the fire to maintain it at a temperature somewhat below the boiling point.

An apparatus of this construction was in the spring of the present year (1835) placed in the Admiralty steamer called the Comet, in connexion with a pair of 40-horse engines. The patentee states that these engines were ill adapted to the contrivance; nevertheless, the vessel was successfully worked in the Thames for 800 miles: she also performed a voyage from Falmouth to Lisbon, but was prevented from returning by an accident which occurred to the machinery near the latter port. In this experimental voyage, the consumption of fuel is stated never to have exceeded a third of her former consumption, when worked by Bolton and Watt's engines; the former consumption of coals being about 800 lbs. per hour, and the consumption with Mr. Howard's engine being under 250 lbs. of coke per hour.

After this failure (which, however, was admitted to be one of accident and not of principle) the government did not consider itself justified in bestowing further time or incurring greater expense in trying this engine. Mr. Howard, however, has himself built a new vessel, in which he is about to place a pair of forty-horse engines. This vessel is now (December, 1835) nearly ready, and will bring the question to issue by a fair experiment. The advantages of the contrivance as enumerated by the patentee are:—

First, The small space and weight occupied by the machinery, arising from the absence of a boiler.

Secondly, The diminished consumption of fuel.

Thirdly, The reduced size of the flues.

Fourthly, The removal of the injurious effects arising from deposite and incrustation.

Fifthly, The absence of smoke.

Some of these improvements, if realized, will be attended with important advantages in steam navigation. Steamers of a given tonnage and power will have more disposable space for lading and fuel, and in short voyages may carry greater freight, or an increased number of passengers; or by taking a larger quantity of fuel,[37] may make greater runs than are now attainable; or, finally, with the same tonnage and the same lading, they may be supplied with more powerful machinery.

(117.) To obtain from the moving power its full amount of mechanical effect in propelling the vessel, it would be necessary that its force should propel, by constantly acting against the water in a horizontal direction, and with a motion contrary to the course of the vessel. No system of mechanical propellers has, however, yet been contrived capable of perfectly attaining this end. Patents have been granted for many ingenious mechanical combinations to impart to the propelling surfaces such angles as appeared to the respective contrivers most advantageous. In most of these, however, the mechanical complexity has formed a fatal objection. No part of the machinery of a steam vessel is so liable to become deranged at sea as the paddle-wheels; and, therefore, such simplicity of construction as is compatible with those repairs which are possible on such emergencies is quite essential for safe practical use.

The ordinary paddle-wheel, as I have already stated, is a wheel revolving upon a shaft driven by the engine, and carrying upon its circumference a number of flat boards, called paddle boards, which are secured by nuts or braces in a fixed position; and that position is such that the planes of the paddle boards diverge nearly from the centre of the shaft on which the wheel turns. The consequence of this arrangement is that each paddle board can only act in that direction which is most advantageous for the propulsion of the vessel when it arrives near the lowest point of the wheel. In figure 67. let o be the shaft on which the common paddle wheel revolves; the position of the paddle boards are represented at A, B, C, &c.; X, Y represents the water line, the course of the vessel being supposed to be from X to Y; the arrows represent the direction in which the paddle-wheel revolves. The wheel is immersed to the depth of the lowest paddle board, since a less degree of immersion would render a portion of the surface of each paddle board mechanically useless. In the position A the whole force of the paddle board is efficient for propelling the vessel; but, as the paddle enters the water in the position H, its action upon the water, not being horizontal, is only partially effective for propulsion: a part of the force which drives the paddle is expended in depressing the water, and the remainder in driving it contrary to the course of the vessel, and, therefore, by its reaction producing a certain propelling effect. The tendency, however, of the paddle entering the water at H, is to form a hollow or trough, which the water, by its ordinary property, has a continual tendency to fill up. After passing the lowest point A, as the paddle approaches the position B, where it emerges from the water, its action again becomes oblique, a part only having a propelling effect, and the remainder having a tendency to raise the water, and throw up a wave and spray behind the paddle-wheel. It is evident that the more deeply the paddle-wheel becomes immersed the greater will be the proportion of the propelling power thus wasted in elevating and depressing the water; and, if the wheel were immersed to its axis, the whole force of the paddle boards, on entering and leaving the water, would be lost, no part of it having a tendency to propel. If a still deeper immersion takes place, the paddle boards above the axis would have a tendency to retard the course of the vessel. When the vessel is, therefore, in proper trim, the immersion should not exceed nor fall short of the depth of the lowest paddle; but for various reasons it is impossible in practice to maintain this fixed immersion: the agitation of the surface of the sea, causing the vessel to roll, will necessarily produce a great variation in the immersion of the paddle-wheels, one becoming frequently immersed to its axle, while the other is raised altogether out of the water. Also the draught of water of the vessel is liable to change, by the variation in her cargo: this will necessarily happen in steamers which take long voyages. At starting they are heavily laden with fuel, which as they proceed is gradually consumed, whereby the vessel is lightened; and it does not appear that it is practicable to use sea water as ballast to restore the proper degree of immersion.

(118.) Among the contrivances which have been proposed for remedying these defects of the common paddle wheel by introducing paddle boards capable of shifting their position as they revolve with the circumference of the wheel, the only one which has been adopted to any considerable extent in practice is that which is commonly known as Morgan's Paddle Wheel. The original patent for this contrivance was granted to Elijah Galloway, and sold by him to Mr. William Morgan. Subsequently to the purchase some improvements in its structure and arrangements were introduced, and it is now extensively adopted by Government in the Admiralty steamers. It was first tried on board His Majesty's steamer the Confiance; and after several successful experiments was ordered by the Lords of the Admiralty to be introduced on board the Flamer, the Firebrand, the Columbia, the Spitfire, the Lightning, a large war steamer called the Medea,[38] the Tartarus, the Blazer, &c. It has been tried by Government in several well-conducted experiments, where two vessels of precisely the same model, supplied with similar engines of equal power, and propelled, one by Morgan's paddle-wheels, and the other by the common paddle-wheels; when it was found that the advantage of the former, whether in smooth or in rough water, was quite apparent. One of the commanders in these experiments (Lieutenant Belson) states that the improvement in the speed of the Confiance, after being supplied with these wheels, was proportionately greater in a sea way than in smooth water; that their action was not impeded by the waves, since the variation of the velocity of the engine did not exceed one or two revolutions per minute: the vessel's way was never stopped, and there was no sensible increase of vibration on the paddle boxes during the gale. Another commander reported that on a comparison of the Confiance and a similar and equally powerful vessel, the Carron, the Confiance performed in fifty-four hours the voyage which occupied the Carron eighty-four hours in running. Independently of the great saving of fuel effected (namely, ten bushels per hour[39]), or the time saved in running the same distance, other advantages have been secured by the modification in question. On a comparison of the respective logs of the two vessels, it appeared that the Confiance had gained by the alteration in her wheels an increase of speed amounting to 2 knots on 7 in smooth water, and 2-1/2 knots on 4 to 4-1/2 knots in rough weather; that the action of the paddles did not bring up the engine or retard their velocity in a head sea; that in rolling their action assisted in righting the vessel; and that the wear and strain, as well on the vessel as on the engines, were materially reduced. With respect to the durability of these wheels, the commander of the Flamer reported in January, 1834, that in six weeks of the most tempestuous weather they found them to act remarkably well, without even a single float being shifted.[40]

This paddle-wheel is represented in figure 68. The contrivance may be shortly stated to consist in causing the wheel which bears the paddles to revolve on one centre, and the radial arms which move the paddles to revolve on another centre. Let A B C D E F G H I be the polygonal circumference of the paddle-wheel, formed of straight bars, securely connected together at the extremities of the spokes or radii of the wheel which turns on the shaft which is worked by the engine; the centre of this wheel being at O. So far this wheel is similar to the common paddle-wheel; but the paddle boards are not, as in the common wheel, fixed at A B C, &c., so as to be always directed to the centre O, but are so placed that they are capable of turning on axles which are always horizontal, so that they can take any angle with respect to the water which may be given to them. From the centres, or the line joining the pivots on which these paddle boards turn, there proceed short arms K, firmly fixed to the paddle boards at an angle of about 120°. On a motion given to this arm K, it will therefore give a corresponding angular motion to the paddle board, so as to make it turn on its pivots. At the extremities of the several arms marked K is a pin or pivot, to which the extremities of the radial arms L are severally attached, so that the angle between each radial arm L and the short paddle arm K is capable of being changed by any motion imparted to L; the radial arms L are connected at the other end with a centre P, round which they are capable of revolving. Now since the points A B C, &c., which are the pivots on which the paddle boards turn, are moved in the circumference of a circle, of which the centre is O, they are always at the same distance from that point; consequently they will continually vary their distance from the other centre P. Thus, when a paddle board arrives at that point of its revolution at which the centre P lies precisely between it and the centre O, its distance from P is less than in any other position. As it departs from that point, its distance from the centre P gradually increases until it arrives at the opposite point of its revolution, where the centre O is exactly between it and the centre P; then the distance of the paddle board from the centre P is greatest. This constant change of distance between each paddle board and the centre P is accommodated by the variation of the angle between the radial arm L and the short paddle board arm K; as the paddle board approaches the centre P this gradually diminishes; and as the distance of the paddle board from P increases, the angle is likewise augmented. This change in the magnitude of the angle, which thus accommodates the varying position of the paddle board with respect to the centre P, will be observed in the figure. The paddle board D is nearest to P; and it will be observed that the angle contained between L and K is there very acute; at E the angle between L and K increases, but is still acute; at F it increases to a right angle; at G it becomes obtuse; and at K, where it is most distant from the centre P, it becomes most obtuse. It again diminishes at I, and becomes a right angle between A and B. Now this continual shifting of the direction of the short arm K is necessarily accompanied by an equivalent change of position in the paddle board to which it is attached; and the position of the second centre P is, or may be, so adjusted that this paddle board, as it enters the water and emerges from it, shall be such as shall be most advantageous for propelling the vessel, and therefore attended with less of that vibration which arises chiefly from the alternate depression and elevation of the water, owing to the oblique action of the paddle boards.[41]

(i) The relative value of the two wheels, namely, the common paddle-wheel, and that of Morgan has been investigated by Professor Barlow of the Military School, at Woolwich, and the results published in a paper of much ability in the Philosophical Transactions for 1834. By this paper it appears, that, when the paddles are not wholly immersed, the wheel of Morgan has no important advantage over the other, and only acquires one when the wheel wallows. But the most important of his inferences is that the common paddle is least efficient when in a vertical position, contrary to the usual opinion. From this we have a right to infer that the search for a form of wheel which shall always keep the paddle vertical is one whose success need not be attended with any important consequence. The superior qualities of Morgan's wheel when the paddles are deeply immersed is ascribed by Barlow to the lessening of the shock sustained by the common paddle-wheel when it strikes the water. This being the case, the triple wheel of Stevens is probably superior to that of Morgan in its efficiency, while it has the advantage of being far simpler and less liable to be put out of order.—A. E. (119.) To form an approximate estimate of the limit of the present powers of steam navigation, it will be necessary to consider the mutual relation of the capacity or tonnage of the vessel; the magnitude, weight, and power of the machinery; the available stowage for fuel; and the average speed attainable in all weathers, as well as the general purposes to which the vessel is to be appropriated, whether for the transport of goods and merchandise, or merely of despatches and passengers. That portion of the capacity of the vessel which is appropriated to the moving power consists of the space occupied by the machinery and the space occupied by the fuel; the magnitude of the latter will necessarily depend upon the length of the voyage which the vessel must make without receiving a fresh supply of coals. If the voyage be short, this space may be proportionally limited, and a greater portion of room will be left for the machinery. If, on the contrary, the voyage be longer, a greater stock of coals will be necessary, and a less space will remain for the machinery. More powerful vessels, therefore, in proportion to their tonnage, may be used for short than for long voyages.

Taking an average of fifty-one voyages made by the Admiralty steamers, from Falmouth to Corfu and back during four years ending June, 1834, it was found that the average rate of steaming, exclusive of stoppages, was 7-1/4 miles per hour, taken in a direct line between the places, and without allowing for the necessary deviations in the course of the vessel. The vessels which performed this voyage varied from 350 to 700 tons burthen by measurement, and were provided with engines varying from 100 horse to 200 horse-power, with stowage for coals varying from 80 to 240 tons. The proportion of the power to the tonnage varied from 1 horse to 3 tons to 1 horse to 4 tons; thus, the Messenger had a power of 200 horses, and measured 730 tons; the Flamer had a power of 120 horses, and measured 500 tons; the Columbia had 120 horses, and measured 360 tons.

In general, it may be assumed that for the shortest class of trips, such as those of the Margate steamers, and the packets between Liverpool or Holyhead and Dublin, the proportion of the power to the tonnage should be that of 1 horse-power to every 2 tons by measure; while for the longest voyages the proportion would be reduced to 1 horse to 4 tons, voyages of intermediate lengths having every variety of intermediate proportion.

Steamers thus proportioned in their power and tonnage may then, on an average of weathers, be expected to make 7-1/4 miles an hour while steaming, which is equivalent to 174 miles per day of twenty-four hours. But, in very long voyages, it rarely happens that a steamer can work constantly without interruption. Besides stress of weather, in which she must sometimes lie-to, she is liable to occasional derangements of her machinery, and more especially of her paddles. In almost every long voyage hitherto attempted, some time has been lost in occasional repairs of this nature while at sea. We shall perhaps, therefore, for long voyages, arrive at a more correct estimate of the daily run of a steamer by taking it at 160 miles.[42]

By a series of carefully conducted experiments on the consumption of coals, under marine boilers and common land boilers, which have been lately made at the works of Mr. Watt, near Birmingham, it has been proved that the consumption of fuel under marine boilers is less than under land boilers, in the proportion of 2 to 3 very nearly. On the other hand, I have ascertained from general observation throughout the manufacturing districts in the North of England, that the average consumption of coals under land boilers of all powers above the very smallest class is at the rate of 15 pounds of coals per horse-power per hour. From this result, the accuracy of which may be fully relied upon, combined with the result of the experiments just mentioned at Soho, we may conclude that the average consumption of marine boilers will be at the rate of 10 lbs. of coal per horse power per hour. Mr. Field, of the firm of Maudslay and Field, in his evidence before a Select Committee of the House of Commons on Steam Navigation to India, has stated from his observation, and from experiments made at different periods, that the consumption is only 8 lbs. per horse-power per hour. In the evidence of Mr. William Morgan, however, before the same committee, the actual consumption of fuel on board the Mediterranean packets is estimated at 16 cwt. per hour for engines of 200 horse power, and 8-1/4 cwt. for engines of 100 horse-power. From my own observation, which has been rather extensive both with respect to land and marine boilers, I feel assured that 10 lbs. per hour more nearly represents the practical consumption than the lower estimate of Mr. Field. We may then assume the daily consumption of coal by marine boilers, allowing them to work upon an average for 22 hours, the remainder of the time being left for casual stoppages, at 220 lbs. of coal per horse-power, or very nearly 1 ton for every ten horses' power. In short voyages, where there will be no stoppage, the daily consumption will a little exceed this; but the distance traversed will be proportionally greater.

When the proportion of the power to the tonnage remains unaltered, the speed of the vessel does not materially change. We may therefore assume that 10 pounds of coal per horse power will carry a sea-going steamer adapted for long voyages 7-1/4 miles direct distance; and therefore to carry her 100 miles will require 138 pounds, or the 1/16th part of a ton nearly. Now, the Mediterranean steamers are capable of taking a quantity of fuel at the rate of 1-1/4 tons per horse power; but the proportion of their power to their tonnage is greater than that which would probably be adapted for longer runs. We shall, therefore, perhaps be warranted in assuming that it is practicable to construct a steamer capable of taking 1-1/2 tons of fuel per horse-power. At the rate of consumption just mentioned, this would be sufficient to carry her 2400 miles in average weather; but as an allowance of fuel must always be made for emergencies, we cannot suppose it possible for her to encounter this extreme run. Allowing, then, spare fuel to the extent of a quarter of a ton per horse-power, we should have as an extreme limit of a steamer's practicable voyage, without receiving a relay of coals, a run of about 2000 miles.

(120.) This computation is founded upon results obtained from the use chiefly of the North of England coal. It has, however, been stated in evidence before the select committee above mentioned, that the Llangennech coal of Wales is considerably more powerful. Captain Wilson, who commanded the Hugh Lindsay steamer in India, has stated that this coal is more powerful than Newcastle, in the proportion of 9 to 6-1/2.[43] Some of the commanders of the Mediterranean packets have likewise stated that the strength of this coal is greater than that of Newcastle in the proportion of 16 to 11.[44] So far then as relates to this coal, the above estimate must be modified, by reducing the consumption nearly in the proportion of 3 to 2.

The class of vessels best fitted for undertaking long voyages, without relays of coal, would be one from about 800 to 1000 tons measurement furnished with engines from 200 to 250 horse-power.[45] Such vessels could take a supply of from 300 to 400 tons of coals, which being consumed at the rate of from 20 to 25 tons per day, would last about fifteen days.

Applying these results, however, to particular cases, it will be necessary to remember that they are average calculations, and must be subject to such modifications as the circumstances may suggest in the particular instances: thus, if a voyage is contemplated under circumstances in which an adverse wind generally prevails, less than the average speed must be allowed, or, what is the same, a greater consumption of fuel for a given distance. Against a strong head wind, in which a sailing vessel would double-reef her top-sails, even a powerful steamer cannot make more than from 2 to 3 miles an hour, especially if she has a head sea to encounter.

(121.) In considering the general economy of fuel, it may be right to state, that the results of experience obtained in the steam navigation of our channels, and particularly in the case of the Post Office packets on the Liverpool station, have clearly established the fact, that by increasing the ratio of the power to the tonnage, an actual saving of fuel in a given distance is effected, while at the same time the speed of the vessel is increased. In the case of the Post Office steamers called the Dolphin and the Thetis (Liverpool station,) the power has been successively increased, and the speed proportionably augmented; but the consumption of fuel per voyage between Liverpool and Dublin has been diminished. This, at first view, appears inconsistent with the known theory of the resistance of solids moving through fluids; since this resistance increases in the same proportion as the square of the speed. But this physical principle is founded on the supposition that the immersed part of the floating body remains the same. Now I have myself proved by experiments on canals, that when the speed of the boat is increased beyond a certain limit, its draught of water is rapidly diminished; and in the case of a large steam raft constructed upon the river Hudson, it was found that when the speed was raised to 20 miles an hour, the draught of water was diminished by 7 inches. I have therefore no doubt that the increased speed of steamers is attended with a like effect; that, in fact, they rise out of the water; so that, although the resistance is increased by reason of their increased speed, it is diminished in a still greater proportion by reason of their diminished immersion.

Meanwhile, whatever be the cause, it is quite certain that the resistance in moving through the water must be diminished, because the moving power is always in proportion to the quantity of coals consumed, and at the same time in the proportion to the resistance overcome. Since, then, the quantity of coals consumed in a given distance is diminished while the speed is increased, the resistance encountered throughout the same distance must be proportionally diminished.

(122.) Increased facility in the extension and application of steam navigation is expected to arise from the substitution of iron for wood, in the construction of vessels. Hitherto iron steamers have been chiefly confined to river navigation; but there appears no sufficient reason why their use should be thus limited. For sea voyages they offer many advantages; they are not half the weight of vessels of equal tonnage constructed of wood; and, consequently, with the same tonnage they will have less draught of water, and therefore less resistance to the propelling power; or, with the same draught of water and the same resistance, they will carry a proportionally heavier cargo. The nature of their material renders them more stiff and unyielding than timber; and they do not suffer that effect which is called hogging, which arises from a slight alteration which takes place in the figure of a timber vessel in rolling, accompanied by an alternate opening and closing of the seams. Iron vessels have the further advantage of being more proof against fracture upon rocks. If a timber vessel strike, a plank is broken, and a chasm opened in her many times greater than the point of rock which produces the concussion. If an iron vessel strike she will either merely receive a dinge, or be pierced by a hole equal in size to the point of rock which she encounters. Some examples of the strength of iron vessels was given by Mr. Macgregor Laird, in his evidence before the Committee of the Commons on Steam Navigation, among which the following may be mentioned:—An iron vessel, called the Alburkah, in one of their experimental trials got aground, and lay upon her anchor: in a wooden vessel the anchor would probably have pierced her bottom; in this case, however, the bottom was only dinged. An iron vessel, built for the Irish Inland Navigation Company, was being towed across Lough Derg in a gale of wind, when the towing rope broke, and she was driven upon rocks, on which she bumped for a considerable time without any injury. A wooden vessel would in this case have gone to pieces. A further advantage of iron vessels (which in warm climates is deserving of consideration) is their greater coolness and perfect freedom from vermin.

(123.) The greatest speed which has yet been attained upon water by the application of steam has been accomplished in the case of a river steamer of peculiar form, which has been constructed upon the river Hudson. This boat, or rather raft, consisted of two hollow vessels formed of thin sheet iron, somewhat in the shape of spindles or cigars (from whence it was called the cigar boat.) In the thickest part these floats were eight feet in diameter, tapering towards the ends, and about 300 feet long: these floats or buoys, being placed parallel to each other, having a distance of more than 16 feet between them, supported a deck or raft 300 feet long, and 32 feet wide. A paddle-wheel 30 feet in diameter and 16 feet broad revolved between the spindles, impelled by a steam engine placed upon the deck. This vessel drew about 30 inches of water, and attained a speed of from 20 to 25 miles an hour: she ran upon a bank in the river Hudson, and was lost. The projector is now employed in constructing another vessel of still larger dimensions. It is evident that such a structure is altogether unfitted for sea navigation. In the case of a wide navigable river, however, such as the Hudson, it will no doubt be attended with the advantage of greater expedition.

(124.) Several projects for the extension of steam navigation to voyages of considerable length have lately been entertained both by the public and by the legislature, and have imparted to every attempt to improve steam navigation increased interest. A committee of the House of Commons collected evidence and made a report in the last session in favour of an experiment to establish a line of steam communication between Great Britain and India. Two routes have been suggested by the committee, each being a continuation of the line of Admiralty steam packets already established to Malta and the Ionian Isles. One of the routes proposed is through Egypt, the Red Sea, and across the Indian Ocean to Bombay, or some of the other Presidencies; the other across the north part of Syria to the banks of the Euphrates, by that river to the Persian Gulf, and from thence to Bombay. Each of these routes will be attended with peculiar difficulties, and in both a long sea voyage will be encountered.

In the route by the Red Sea, it is proposed to establish steamers between Malta and Alexandria (860 miles). A steamer of 400 tons burthen and 100 horse-power would perform this voyage, upon an average of all weathers incident to the situation, in from 5 to 6 days, consuming 10 tons of coal per day. But it is probable that it might be found more advantageous to establish a higher ratio between the power and the tonnage. From Alexandria, the transit might be effected by land across the Isthmus to Suez—a journey of from 4 to 5 days—by caravan and camels; or the transit might be made either by land or water from Alexandria to Cairo, a distance of 173 miles; and from Cairo to Suez, 93 miles, across the desert, in about 5 days. At Suez would be a station for steamers, and the Red Sea would be traversed in 3 runs or more. If necessary, stations for coals might be established at Cosseir, Judda, Mocha, and finally at Socatra—an island immediately beyond the mouth of the Red Sea, in the Indian Ocean: the run from Suez to Cosseir would be 300 miles—somewhat more than twice the distance from Liverpool to Dublin. From Cosseir to Judda, 450 miles; from Judda to Mocha, 517 miles; and from Mocha to Socatra, 632 miles. It is evident that all this would, without difficulty, in the most unfavourable weather, fall within the present powers of steam navigation. If the terminus of the passage be Bombay, the run from Socatra to Bombay will be 1200 miles, which would be, upon an average of weather, about 8 days' steaming. The whole passage from Alexandria to Bombay, allowing 3 days for delay between Suez and Bombay, would be 26 days: the time from Bombay to Malta would therefore be about 33 days; and adding 14 days to this for the transit from Malta to England, we should have a total of 47 days from London to Bombay, or about 7 weeks.

If the terminus proposed were Calcutta, the course from Socatra would be 1250 miles south-east to the Maldives, where a station for coals would be established. This distance would be equal to that from Socatra to Bombay. From the Maldives, a run of 400 miles would reach the southern point of Ceylon, called the Point de Galle, which is the best harbour (Bombay excepted) in British India: from the Point de Galle, a run of 600 miles will reach Madras; and from Madras to Calcutta would be a run of about 600 miles. The voyage from London to Calcutta would be performed in about 60 days. At a certain season of the year there exists a powerful physical opponent to the transit from India to Suez: from the middle of June until the end of September, the south-west monsoon blows with unabated force across the Indian Ocean, and more particularly between Socatra and Bombay. This wind is so violent as to leave it barely possible for the most powerful steam packet to make head against it, and the voyage could not be accomplished without serious wear and tear upon the vessels during these months—if indeed it would be practicable at all for any continuance in that season. The attention of parliament has therefore been directed to another line of communication, not liable to this difficulty: it is proposed to establish a line of steamers from Bombay through the Persian Gulf to the Euphrates. The run from Bombay to a place called Muscat, on the southern shore of the Gulf, would be 840 miles in a north-west direction, and therefore not opposed to the south-west monsoon. From Muscat to Bassidore, a point upon the northern coast of the strait at the mouth of the Persian Gulf, would be a run of 255 miles; from Bassidore to Bushire, another point on the eastern coast of the Persian Gulf, would be a run of 300 miles; and from Bushire to the mouth of the Euphrates, would be 120 miles. It is evident that the longest of these runs would offer no more difficulty than the passage from Malta to Alexandria. From Bussora near the mouth of the Euphrates, to Bir, a town upon its left bank near Aleppo, would be 1143 miles, throughout which there are no physical obstacles to the river navigation which may not be overcome. Some difficulties arise from the wild and savage character of the tribes who occupy its banks. It is, however, thought that by proper measures, and securing the co-operation of the Pacha of Egypt, any serious obstruction from this cause may be removed. From Bir, by Aleppo, to Scanderoon, a port upon the Mediterranean, opposite Cyprus, is a land journey, said to be attended with some difficulty but not of great length; and from Scandaroon to Malta is about the same distance as between the latter place and Alexandria. It is calculated that the time from London to Bombay by the Euphrates—supposing the passage to be successfully established—would be a few days shorter than by Egypt and the Red Sea.

Whichever of these courses may be adopted, it is clear that the difficulties, so far as the powers of the steam engine are concerned, lie in the one case between Socatra and Bombay, or between Socatra and the Maldives, and in the other case between Bombay and Muscat. Even the run from Malta to Alexandria or Scandaroon is liable to objection, from the liability of the boiler to deposite and incrustation, unless some effectual method be taken to remove this source of injury. If, however, the contrivance of Mr. Hall, or of Mr. Howard, or any other expedient for a like object, be successful, the difficulty will then be limited to the necessary supply of coals for so long a voyage. This, however, has already been encountered and overcome on four several voyages by the Hugh Lindsay steamer from Bombay to Suez: that vessel encountered a still longer run on these several trips, by going, not to Socatra but to Aden, a point on the coast of Arabia near the Straits of Babel Mandeb, being a run of 1641 miles, which she performed in 10 days and 19 hours. The entire distance from Bombay to Suez was in one case performed in 16 days and 16 hours; and under the most unfavourable circumstances, in 23 days. The average was 21 days for each trip.

(125.) Another projected line of steam communication, which offers circumstances of equal interest to the people of these countries and the United States, is that which is proposed to be established between London and New York. On the completion of the London and Liverpool railroad, Dublin will be connected with London, by a continuous line of steam transport. It is proposed to continue this line by a railroad from Dublin to some point on the western coast of Ireland; among others, the harbour of Valentia has been mentioned. The nearest point of the western continent is St. John's, Newfoundland, the distance of which from Valentia is 1900 miles; the distance from St. John's to New York is about 1200 miles, Halifax (Nova Scotia) being a convenient intermediate station. The distance from Valentia to St. John's comes very near the point which we have already assigned as the probable present limit of steam navigation. The Atlantic Ocean also offers a formidable opponent in the westerly winds which almost constantly prevail in it. These winds are, in fact, the reaction of the trades, which blow near the equator in a contrary direction, and are produced by those portions of the equatorial atmosphere which, rushing down the northern latitudes, carry with them the velocity from west to east proper to the equator. Besides this difficulty, St. John's and Halifax are both inaccessible, by reason of the climate, during certain months of the year. Should these causes prevent this project from being realized, another course may be adopted. We may proceed from the southern point of Ireland or England to the Azores, a distance of about 1800 miles: from the Azores to New York would be a distance of about 2000 miles, or from the Azores to St. John's would be 1600 miles.[46]

(k) While the inhabitants of Great Britain are discussing the project of the communication with New York, by means of the stations described by Dr. Lardner, those of the United States appear to be seriously occupied in carrying into effect a direct communication from New York to Liverpool. At the speed which has been given to the American steam boats, this presents no greater difficulties than the voyage from the Azores to New York, would, to one having the speed of no more than 7-1/4 miles per hour. As this attempt is beyond the limit of individual enterprise, there is, at the present moment, an application before the Legislature of the State of New York for a charter to carry this project into effect. It will be difficult to estimate the results of this enterprise, which will bring the old and new world within 12 or 15 days voyage of each other.—A. E.[47]