You are dealing with something far more precious than any plant—the priceless soul of a child.—Burbank. THE civic recognition of marriage does not take direct cognizance of the Ideal, or love-phase, of this unilateral contract, although it assumes that love is the motive of the union. The state takes it for granted that the purpose of this union is to perpetuate the race, give to the state citizens. The permanence of the marriage is supposed to be desirable, because the physical support and welfare of wife and children rests with the husband, unless he become insane, sick or criminal. Then Charity gives the pauperizing support of a tyrant. Desirable citizens are seldom evolved in “Institutions.” In marriage the state obtains the promise of the contracting parties to love, honor and cherish; to love, honor and obey, through sickness, through health, until death. However, the state is able to enforce but one portion of the promise, “to cherish,” which, being interpreted, means that the husband must contribute a certain portion of his income to the woman, provided she has not broken the letter of the law in one respect, and has not deserted nor flagrantly quarreled with her husband. If she has been acquiescent, she is still to be “cherished.” This alimony, as such tax is sometimes termed, is required whether the wife is mother or not, or is engaged in educating citizens or not. It may be exacted—the letter of the law—although the intent of the marriage may not have been fulfilled. Loving or not loving is not within the control of mortals. It is admitted now by men and women that the laws of all countries of the world were made by men for men. They do not discriminate against women so seriously and so unjustly as did Moses, but the civil laws give wife and mother no chance for independence. Until recently, the promise to obey has been enforced; also, the wife’s promise to be true to one man and none other. So we have had the prayer which is international: “Make our women virtuous and our men brave,” the meaning of brave being, able to fight man and beast. “Virtue” has been interpreted as being a negation, an indifference to all but husband. “Oh, Liberty! Liberty! What crimes are committed in thy name!” Woman has found submission easier than to assert and obtain the human right of independence in the control of her own mind and body. “It is a hard world for girls,” said Martin Luther, five hundred years ago. It is still a hard world for girls and women. Nature is said to love the female more than the male, for she serves Her more devotedly, and Nature has taken care that she shall. |