Puebla, the misgoverned—Justice under Colonel Cabrera—Royal Family of Chihuahua—Tampico—Presidents Diaz and Madero.

In 1909 I went to Puebla, to take charge of a large contract there, and came in contact with another kind of governor from our old friend Don Miguel Ahumada. He also was an old-time soldier (friend and supporter of Diaz), General Mucio Martinez, but as different from Colonel Don Miguel Ahumada as night is from day. Puebla was the most misgoverned state in the country, and the barefaced robbery and oppression openly carried on was a revelation to me. All the butcher business, public coaches, the best of the liquor business, and the theatre were in the hands of a clique headed by the governor. The Jefe Politico had bought from the state the right to all fines. The effect of this was twofold; habitual offenders, drunks, thieves, ladies of the Vida Alegro, &c., were turned loose as soon as their friends paid the fines, and never got jail sentences because they were such a profitable source of revenue. They would soon err again, be rearrested, and fined once more. I was told that any policeman who did not make a certain number of arrests in the month lost his job. On the other hand, the casual offenders (more especially those with a trade) always got jail sentences, which they worked out on private jobs or contracts of the Jefe Politico. This man made a fortune in less than six years, and skipped for France when the revolution broke out.

The Jefe’s assistant, Colonel Cabrera, was the chief of police till killed by one of the members of the Serdan family at the outbreak of the revolution. I found this was the man who could either be of much assistance or annoyance to me on the contract, and I went to call on him to find out what could be arranged. I told him, in the course of conversation, that I needed three watchmen on the job, and he at once offered to get them for me. He asked as to pay, &c., and then sent me three of the city’s secret-service men, and, I presume, pocketed their pay, as he was more than friendly to me during the time I was there. On one occasion a man of some importance in the city walked across the fresh asphalt and one of my men spoke rather rudely to him about his lack of brains and culture. He promptly had my foreman arrested, and in the argument that followed two or three more of the men got arrested for taking the foreman’s part. As I was riding down the street I met them all on the way to the commissaria, and had the matter explained to me. I rode on ahead, and went to see Colonel Cabrera. When I had finished explaining the matter to him he called an assistant and told him to go down and tell the judge to turn my men loose as soon as they arrived without further investigation. I thanked him and went down to see the order carried out. When we arrived in the court-room the complainant was in the middle of his speech, and the assistant, instead of going up and whispering the order in the judge’s ear, said, in a loud voice, "Colonel Cabrera’s compliments, and you are to turn these men loose without further investigation." Such was the justice one could get under these men; but it was really comical to see the complainant’s face at such summary methods.

On another occasion I went to see him about one of my men that I had discharged, and who had gone up to my office and scared my clerk nearly into a fit by waving a pistol and saying he wanted to kill me. Cabrera asked me if I had a pistol, and on my replying in the affirmative he said, “Then it is very simple, you shoot him the first time you see him near your office, before he can shoot you.” I told him that was all right, but I did not want to get into jail. “No,” he said, “that need not bother you, as he has threatened your life before witnesses.” I happened to meet this man a day or two later on the street, and went up to him and said I had heard he was looking for trouble, and that Colonel Cabrera had told me to shoot him if he came near my office. But he denied all enmity, &c., &c. I have always found it best to tackle these cases at once, for if you do not treat them with a high hand you are liable to get shot in the back some night.

From Puebla I went to Chihuahua to take charge of a contract there. The town and state of Chihuahua used to be run by what was known as the Royal Family. The head of the family is Terrazas, who owns in ranches almost the entire state, and the balance of the family consists of the Creels, the Munoz, and the Quilty, and I was told that there were 116 first cousins. All these, of course, had to have a living, and they were all provided for. One of them was building a large edifice at the time I was there, and was using one of the principal streets as his stoneyard to cut the stone for the building. He had the street closed to traffic, and was getting along very comfortably; unfortunately, this street was one that was in our contract to be paved. When we had completed nearly all the other streets we asked him to please move out and let us in, and his answer was, “I wish to get my work completed by a certain date. Naturally it will inconvenience you, but that cannot be helped. Of course if you think that you can have me moved, why, go ahead and try, but I think you will find that I am a man of some importance.” So the interview closed, and we found that he was indeed of some importance, and that nothing could be done. I was told that the only way to go into business up there was to get some member of the family in with you, and the facts bear this out. They own the street car-lines, the brewery, the lumber-yard, the brick-yard, the biscuit company, the electric power and light company, and the slaughterhouse, and if they missed anything it was because it was not worth having. Yet, with it all, possibly because of it, the town is a very busy one, though it was this state of affairs, and the way things were run in Puebla, that brought about the revolution. The people had nothing to lose, and might gain by a change of government.

From Chihuahua I went first to Durango, where I only stayed a short time; and then to Tampico, where we had another large contract. Tampico is only a small town of possibly 35,000 people, but one of the busiest towns in the republic, with an American population of about 1000 people. The main industry, of course, is oil, and most of the men are employed or connected in some way with that industry. But of late years many settlers have gone into the country to buy farms, and cultivate tropical fruits, and some, at least, seem to be doing well. But the country has many drawbacks, at least for a Saxon; for, though the climate is not at all bad, the insect-pests are numerous, and keep one too active for such a warm climate. The soil which is so good for the tropical fruit is also good to raise tropical jungle, and the jungle of the Tampico country is something that one must see to believe. However, those that have taken up farms seem to be well satisfied, and are making money.

For sport, Tampico and the surrounding country can hardly be beaten in the Republic, both for fishing, hunting, and boating. While I was there the record tarpon up to date was caught (7 feet 5 inches long); but besides tarpon there are many other game fish—the yellow tail, black and red snapper, various kinds of rock-fish, and I caught one shark, 7 feet long, which gave me plenty of fun. Tampico saw nothing of the revolution, though after it was all over we had one day, or rather night and day, of rioting, which kept everybody in a state of anxiety. Of the revolution every one has no doubt read in the papers more than I could tell. On the whole, I think it passed off very well, all except the horrible slaughter of helpless Chinamen in Torreon, of whom 303 were killed in cold blood for the money they were supposed to have. One American there saved the lives of thirty-six of them. He was the yard-master, and got that number into an empty box-car, which he switched round all day long while the rioters searched the trains for them. For a little while the changes were rapid, and both in Guadalajara and Morelia they had three different governors in one day. Diaz was not beaten when he finally decided to leave the country. He had been kept in ignorance up till the last moment by his friends (?) as to the true state of affairs, and when he found out that the people as a whole were against him, he resigned to save further bloodshed. Since then we have had rumours of counter-revolution after counter-revolution, but none has so far materialised, except the fiasco of General Reyes, who could only get together seven followers. He is another “grandstander,” and when he gave himself up he said he had decided not to go on with the “War.”

One hears much of the uprising of Zapata, but Zapatism is not a revolution against any particular government but against a condition. The people are demanding that the land shall be divided up amongst them, so that they will not be slaves of the hacendados, and when once this is done we shall hear the last of Zapata.

At first the feeling against Diaz was very strong in the country, for the people did not understand, then, that it was his so-called friends who were to blame, and not he. Now, however, this feeling is dying out, and you hear many people talking of Diaz, and agreeing that he has done much for his country, for which the country should be grateful to him. Many people are fond of decrying Madero, saying he is not a man of force, but if he had been a second Diaz they would, on the other hand, have been crying, “We have exchanged one tyrant for another.” It seems to me, an outsider, that he will “make good” if allowed the chance, but any man who tries to fill Diaz' clothes will have a hard job of it.

I am still seeking fortune in America; I have sought it in Canada, the United States, and Mexico, but it appears as far off in 1912 as ever it did. America is a land of great opportunities, but rarely for the Briton or the man without capital. I have written my life to date, attempting at the same time to depict my surroundings, and if any one has got half the pleasure out of reading these rambling reminiscences that I have had in going back in spirit over the old scenes, I am satisfied.

---

---

Nigeria: Its Peoples and its Problems.

Times.—‘The writing is clear and the opinions bold. Mr. Morel’s personal impressions comprise many powerful thoughts and suggestions. His book altogether is one of distinctive value to the student and administrator.’

---

Pastels under the Southern Cross.

Scotsman.—‘Tell about the people and the South African life in chapters of never flagging interest, with every now and then a striking passage of description.’

---

A Homeward Mail: Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. net.

Morning Post.—‘There is much concentrated wisdom in his small book.’

Scotsman.—‘The Colonel is never wearisome. His letters are full of pithy remarks and lively anecdotes.’

---

Children at Play, and Other Sketches.

½½½½ Daily Mirror.—‘The author is most at home among the little ones of Italy. She has made her subjects very attractive and human.’

---

An Outpost in Papua.

Church Times.—‘Mr. Chignell’s book on Papua is missionary literature of a refreshing kind. It is brimful of humour and humanity.’

---

Two Visits to Denmark.

Morning Post.—‘A book which in the guise of a quiet and delightful narrative gives you an insight into one of the most delightful countries of Europe.’

Daily Mirror.—‘It is full of an exquisite sense of humour.’

---

---

---

The Great Duke.

Liverpool Post.—‘Written ... by a master of narrative. The history of the exhaustive Peninsular campaign has never been written more picturesquely, yet with such regard to truth.’

---

Daily Telegraph.—‘Simple, straightforward, manly, and unadorned, this literary record is a worthy tribute to the career which it describes. Admiral Seymour has to his credit as distinguished a career as any officer in the British Navy.’

---

Observer.—‘The Drake records are rich and so excellently managed and arranged by Lady Eliott-Drake that we get a very close and vivid picture of life in Devon and in London for nearly two hundred years.’

---

With 2 Portraits in Photogravure and 2 Illustrations.	Large post 8vo.
	7s. 6d. net.

? A biography of William Makepeace Thackeray, the grandfather of the Novelist.

Standard.—‘Mr. Bradley Birt’s knowledge of India, not only as it is now, but also as it was in the latter part of the eighteenth century, has enabled him to give the story a vividness which is not always found in Anglo-Indian Biography.’

---

Times.—‘A life which in its greatness and variety of relief, no less than in the picturesque abundance of detail available, yields to five or six alone in the whole splendid gallery of seventeenth century biography.’

---

---

---

Leaves of the Tree: Studies in Biography.

CONTENTS:—Introductory.—Bishop Westcott.—Henry Sidgwick.—J. K. Stephen.—Bishop Wilkinson.—Professor Newton.—Frederic Myers.—Bishop Lightfoot.—Henry Bradshaw.—Matthew Arnold.—Charles Kingsley.—Bishop Wordsworth of Lincoln.—Epilogue.

Daily Telegraph.—‘This may be accounted among the most valuable of all Mr. Benson’s books.’

---

Hannah More: A Biographical Study.

Aberdeen Journal.—‘Miss Meakin writes with profound knowledge of her subject. We have read the volume with deep interest and appreciation, and cordially recommend it to our readers as a treasure of good things, as well as an admirable account of Hannah More.’

---

The Annals of the Irish Harpers.

Standard.—‘This fascinating volume, Mrs. Milligan Fox writes excellently well concerning the traditions of the harp in Ireland, and incidentally throws a flood of light not merely on the bards of ancient Ireland but on historic harps which have been preserved until the present time.’

---

Memoirs and Memories. 2nd Impression.

Daily News.—'There will always be a welcome among a multitude of readers for a new book from the author of “Pot-Pourri from a Surrey Garden” ... book lovers will find a good deal to their taste in her latest volume.'

---

Chawton Manor and its Owners:

Times.—'Mr. Austen Leigh gives to his researches of the Old Hampshire Manor a literary touch which lightens his extracts from the original documents. The personal interest for the public centres mostly about Jane Austen, her home and her family.

---

---

---

Lombard Street:

Financial Times.—‘This well-known work representsggg a standard manual of the Money Market, and the new edition, brought up to date, will be appreciated by those who have derived help from the earlier editions.’

Financial News.—‘There is no city man, however ripe his experience, who could not add to his knowledge from its pages.’

---

The Meaning of Money.

Financial News.—‘There can be no doubt that Mr. Withers’ book will supersede all other introductions to monetary science ... readers will find it a safe and indispensable guide through the mazes of the Money Market.’

Daily Mail.—‘A book for the average man. Volumes upon volumes have been written to explain and discuss our monetary system. Now we have a work worth all the rest put together in clearness of exposition and elegance of diction.’

Manchester Guardian (leading article).—‘No common measure of literary accomplishment, a lucid, forceful, and pointed style, and a great store of material for apt and often amusing illustration have lent both grace and charm to a work of quite exceptional utility.’

---

Stocks and Shares.

World.—'“Stocks and Shares” is attracting a lot of notice in the City. It is full of information for both speculator and investor, and is written with a brightness and humour that prove the possibility of dealing with the driest of subjects in an attractive manner.'

Morning Post.—'It is a good book, it is sure of its public, and if the laymen who read it will only follow Mr. Withers’ advice more than one “bucket-shop” will be closed till further notice.'

Daily News.—'Should be of the greatest value to investors and all who take an interest in City matters.... It is eminently readable, and the description of a typical flotation, “Hygienic Toothpowder, Ltd.,” is a literary gem.'

---

---