I submit to my professional friends and acquaintances, as well as to all those medical brethren who take an interest in the progressive advancement of the sciences they cultivate, a series of beautifully executed Drawings of anatomical preparations, intended to explain and illustrate the important subjects of “Abortion”, and “The Diseases incidental to Menstruation”; subjects in which all classes of the medical profession, whether specifically devoted or not to obstetrical practice, are equally interested. The drawings speak for themselves. The Artist, under my immediate and constant superintendence, and with the anatomical preparations in every case before him, explained and demonstrated to him, has, in the course of six years, been able to produce twelve plates, containing upwards of forty anatomical figures, lithographed and coloured by himself, which reflect no small honour on the arts of this country, and are highly creditable to his abilities. These plates, I will venture to say, leave nothing to be desired in such a mode of representing anatomical subjects, (a mode which appears from the present endeavours to be the best calculated of any for that purpose,) whilst they remove every cause of regret, hitherto entertained, that the most successful efforts of anatomical lithographic representation, of which foreign countries can boast, had never yet been equalled in England. It may now be asserted that those efforts have been triumphantly rivalled by Mr. Joseph Perry on the present occasion; and, in some of the plates, unquestionably surpassed.

Having said thus much in favour of the Artist, I hope I shall be excused if I add, for myself, that I have selected such specimens only as I considered likely to illustrate some of the most interesting points of the physiology of human generation, and which might assist in unravelling the various practical difficulties which beset that mysterious question;—that I have chosen those which, I believe, (with the exception of one or two preparations,) have never been published before either in this or any other country, and many of which are to be found only in some private anatomical collection;—that I have explained them in such a way as to render their meaning and usefulness evident to all my brethren;—and that, under such circumstances, I venture to believe that the plates so explained will prove of no inconsiderable service to every medical practitioner as a work of reference, where either a private or a public museum is not at hand to solve cases of doubt.

I am aware that I might have extended this series of representations to more than double the present number of analogous preparations; but I purposely limited it to what it is, from a consciousness that any unnecessary increase in the number of plates, which the peculiarity of the subject did not absolutely require, would only tend to increase the bulk, and with it the expense of the “Graphic Illustrations”, without any adequate or corresponding advantage.

It may, after all, be asked: were these delineations wanted? Were there not already in existence works of a similar, or at least analogous character, executed in an equally masterly style, to which the medical reader and the physiologist could refer for information and in cases of doubt? I reply, yes, to the first—and negatively, to the second question.

And first, of the second question. Not to speak of the many authors on matters of this description, who preceded Dr. Hunter and Professor Soemmering, in giving representations of the human embryo in many of its metamorphoses, such as Ruysch, Noortwyk, Albinus, Krapft, Wrisberg, Camper, Blumenbach, Denman, and others, I am ready to admit that both Hunter and Soemmering had given to the world delineations, such as are here referred to, which ought to satisfy the medical profession. The one in his splendid work on the “Gravid Uterus”, gigantic folio edition—the other in his no less valuable folio plates of the human embryo. But, unfortunately, neither of those works can be considered as accessible to the generality of professional readers, on account of their high price and rarity; and even if either were accessible, the subjects therein treated are viewed differently from those collected in the present work. Those works, moreover, present no coloured specimen of delineations of parts, most of which, if not all, from that simple circumstance, lose their principal value;—and as productions of art they are not equal to what Mr. Perry has enabled me to offer to the public. Soemmering himself, in his “Icones Embryonum Humanorum”, admits, that although those who had gone before him in the same channel of inquiry, had produced valuable works and splendid plates, particularly Dr. Hunter and Dr. Denman; there was yet room for a more complete, and, above all, for a more minute representation of the metamorphoses of the human embryo. “Elegans profecto et utilis admodum speculatio!” exclaims the veteran physiologist; and forthwith he proceeds to compare what he had been able to give to the public on the subject of embryology with that which his predecessors had done. This leads him to the conclusion that, from having paid greater attention to minuteness, from being more strictly accurate, from the advantage of having a better collection of specimens than fall to the lot of most anatomists, and from the circumstance of both his delineator and engraver being much superior to those of former times—he had been able to complete a work of art on the progressive development of the human foetus which left those of his predecessors far behind.

With one or two exceptions, the representations in Soemmering’s work are simply those of the foetus in its progressive advancement from the third week after fecundation, to the fifth or sixth month of gestation. Those representations have no reference to the whole ovum at those several periods of fecundation: and they are not coloured. Still they are, as he has stated, superior as a work of art to any that had appeared before. Soemmering tells us that he selected for his plates the best specimens of the human embryo, the best draughtsman, and the most skilful engraver; and that when he compared those plates with those of Trioenius, Albinus, Wrisberg, Hunter, and Denman, in order that he might better understand, explain, and perhaps correct his own: “magnopere delectabatur”, to find, on such a comparison, that the superiority of his plates was not inconsiderable. Well, then, let the reader who has the means of doing so, turn to the two folio plates of Soemmering, and then direct his attention to the fourteen plates contained in the present volume, and I will abide by their decision whether or no, in all such delineations as relate to either parallel or identical subjects in the two publications, the palm of superiority (in every circumstance of design, precision, and execution,) which Soemmering claimed for his publication, ought not to be yielded by him to another sent forth under the advantage of recent improvements in drawing, and a newly invented art admirably adapted for such imitations of nature. Independently of which advantages there is to be added the charm of colour—a circumstance which so greatly embellishes, without disfiguring, truth.

With such impressions, I can feel no hesitation in giving publicity to my collection; and if in selecting, denominating, and appropriating to particular views of my own the several specimens I now publish, there should be found neither taste nor judgment, novelty nor utility, the blame must rest on me—but the merit of superiority will still remain to it as a work of art, which, in the department of morbid embryology, has at present no equal either in England or on the Continent.

Now to the first question—whether these delineations were wanted? I support the affirmative by appealing to all those of the profession who have had occasion to be consulted in cases of abortion and the expulsion of those singular productions of the uterine cavity, which seem connected with menstruation or faulty conception. Let them say whether a work, in which the principal of the infinitely varied aborted human ova, and of the uterine productions alluded to, are faithfully represented, be not likely to be useful; whether, in fact, it be not wanted—or whether it exist already anywhere. If the want of such a work be made manifest, its importance must be self-evident. But that importance is not a little enhanced when we find Denman—a plain unsophisticated practitioner—with quite enough of science to constitute him an authority in physiological questions concerning human generation,—recommending the inquiry, in his own work on an analogous subject, entitled “Engravings representing the Generation of some Animals”, in which he has given three drawings of aborted ova. “It must be allowed”, observes the Doctor, “that the generality of these things (the aborted ova) are preserved for their beauty, or as matter of curiosity, rather than of use. I suspect, nevertheless, that there are some appearances besides the vesicula umbilicalis not yet perfectly understood, and therefore recommend the whole subject as worthy of being reviewed”: and, in a subsequent part, he says, that “in every collection there must be some example, which may enable us to distinguish the different parts of which an ovum is composed, the proportion which they bear to each other at different periods of pregnancy, and sometimes the process of utero gestation which failed”. What greater encouragement, therefore, needed I than this opinion and advice of one of the best obstetricians England can boast of, to select, prepare, and point out the importance of this species of anatomical and physiological delineations?

I shall conclude, by remarking, that the plates are intended to illustrate a work “On Abortion and the Diseases incidental to Menstruation”, which I have been preparing for several years, and a prospectus of the contents of which will be found at the end of the present volume. That work will appear, Deo favente, in the course of the present year; but for the convenience of such persons as may not feel inclined to purchase it, the collection of plates has been purposely so arranged, as to be published, with a corresponding text, in a separate form, and independently of the forthcoming volume.

Grafton-street, Berkeley-square, 30th March, 1833.