Graham's Magazine, Vol. XXXVII, No. 3, September 1850

Previous

ACT I.

ACT II.

ACT III.

ACT IV.

ACT V.

CHAPTER VIII.

CHAPTER IX.

CHAPTER X.

CHAPTER XI.

CHAPTER I.

CHAPTER II.

CHAPTER III.

CHAPTER IV.

CHAPTER V.

CHAPTER VI.

GRAHAM’S MAGAZINE.

Vol. XXXVII.      Sept, 1850.      No. 3.

Table of Contents

Fiction, Literature and Articles

Shakspeare—Analysis of Macbeth
Pedro de Padilh (continued)
A Visit to Staten Island
Woodlawn: or the Other Side of the Medal
“What Can Woman Do?”
The Bride of the Battle
Doctrine of Form
Coquet versus Coquette
The Genius of Byron
Rail and Rail Shooting
The Fine Arts
Mandan Indians
Review of New Books

Poetry, Music and Fashion

Ode
Lines in Memory of My Lost Child
Evening
The Wasted Heart
A Health to My Brother
On a Portrait of Cromwell
A Sea-Side Reverie
Audubon’s Blindness
Sonnets
On the Death of General Taylor
“Psyche Loves Me.”
To the Lost One
Outward Bound
He Comes Not
The Bright New Moon of Love
Barcarole
Le Follet

Transcriber’s Notes can be found at the end of this eBook.


GRAHAM’S MAGAZINE.


Vol. XXXVII.     PHILADELPHIA, September, 1850.     No. 3.


ANALYSIS OF MACBETH.

———

BY HENRY C. MOORHEAD.

———

The reader who has not considered the subject in Ulrici’s point of view, will, perhaps, scarcely be prepared, at first sight, to believe that the two plays of Macbeth and the Merchant of Venice, have the same “ground-idea;” that both are, throughout, imbued with the same sentiment, yet he will readily perceive the similarity of the leading incidents of these plays. Shylock insists on the literal terms of his bond, and “stands for judgment,” according to the strict law of Venice. He is entitled to a pound of flesh; “the law allows it, and the court awards it;” but his bond gives him no drop of blood, and neither more nor less than just a pound. Thus the letter of the law, on which he has so sternly insisted, serves in the end to defeat him. In like manner Macbeth relies with fatal confidence on the predictions of the weird sisters, that “none of woman born shall harm Macbeth;” and that he “shall never vanquished be till Birnam wood do come to Dunsinane.” The predictions are more literally fulfilled than he anticipated, and that very strictness of interpretation makes them worthless.

Now it is from these incidents—both of the same import—that the respective themes of these plays are drawn; hence those themes are substantially the same, and may be thus expressed:

The relation of form to substance—of the letter to the spirit—of the real to the ideal. But the different aspects in which this idea is presented are multiform; as empty, superfluous words; ambiguities, equivocations, irony, riddles, formality, prescription, superstition; witches, ghosts, dreams, omens, etc., etc.

The reason and the propriety of the introduction of the witches in Macbeth, has often been a subject of speculation. It may be remarked in general, that Shakspeare always follows very closely the original story on which his plot is founded. The question as to any given circumstance, therefore, generally is rather why he has retained than why he has introduced it. In the history of Macbeth, as he read it in the old chronicles, he found the weird sisters, and also their equivocal predictions; and it was upon these predictions as a “ground-idea,” (as has already been observed,) that he constructed the play. The witches, therefore, were not introduced for the sake of the play, but it might rather be said the play was written for the sake of the witches.

——


Top of Page
Top of Page