Unlike the drift net, which only catches fish of one species and of fairly uniform size when they are swimming near the surface, the trawl net scoops up practically all the inhabitants of the sea bottom, including round fish, e.g. cod and haddock; flat fish, e.g. sole and plaice, as well as various invertebrates (jelly fish), and marine plants and stones. The trawl is essentially a flattened, conical net that is dragged open-mouthed along the sea bottom. The two kinds of trawl in common use—the beam trawl and the otter trawl—differ in the method that is adopted for keeping open the mouth of the net. The beam trawl is used by sailing vessels, the otter trawl by steamers. Sailing trawlers are divided into two classes: first class smacks and second class cutters. The smack is a two masted vessel with fore and aft rig, generally making a five or six day voyage, and trawling in depths of up to 40 fathoms. The cutter makes shorter voyages—20 hours—and generally keeps within territorial waters. To work a beam trawl successfully, it is necessary to know the character of the sea bottom, whether rough or smooth, and also the time and direction of the tide. The net is trawled with the tide a little faster than it is running, so that sufficient resistance is encountered to keep the net extended. In shooting the trawl, great care must be taken to make it alight on its runners in the correct position for trawling. If the net be twisted, or if it alight upside down, it has been shot “foul, Since trawling is generally carried out on smooth ground, the greater proportion of the catch consists of certain kinds of demersal fishes that frequent sand and gravel. Of these, the most important are cod, haddock, whiting, ling, hake, catfish, sole, plaice, turbot, and brill. Certain of these species also frequent rocky ground, and are taken in such areas by the line fishermen. Generally speaking, line fishermen work in deeper water than trawlers and capture larger fish, though of fewer species, e.g. cod, halibut, ling, skates and rays. The original sailing trawlers are rapidly being superseded by steam trawlers. The first steam trawling company was formed in 1882. It had a capital of £20,000 and a fleet of four vessels. It trawled on the Dogger Bank for three years with marked success. After this the future of steam trawling was assured. The steam trawler is many times more efficient than a smack, for it can fish in nearly all weathers, including calm, and it can trawl over rough bottoms, owing to its greater power, and can go much further afield. Total length, 160 ft. Explanation of Section.—1. Wheelhouse. 2. Captain’s cabin. 3. Collision bulkhead. 4. Crew’s quarters. 5. Store for gear, nets, etc. 6. Chain locker. 7. Fish-pounds (on deck). 8. Fish-hold. 9. Cross bunker (for coal). 10. Main bunker. 11. Passage to bunker. 12. Steam-winch. 13. Stokehold. 14. Lifeboat. 15. Triple expansion engines (650 indicated h.p.). 16. Bathroom. 17. Mate’s quarters. 18. Dining-room and berths for engineers. 19. Storeroom. Larger image (124 kB) Modern British steam trawlers travel as far afield as Iceland, Newfoundland and Morocco. Steam trawling developed rapidly, and resulted in a correspondingly rapid decrease in the number of sailing trawlers. Between 1893 and 1903, the number of first class smacks in Great Britain decreased from over 2,000 with an average tonnage (net) of 57·4 to less than 900 with an average tonnage (net) of 40. From 1903 until the present day, the number had remained between 900 and 800; it would seem, therefore, that the relative numbers and importance of smacks and steam trawlers gradually attained to a condition of equilibrium. Between 1900 and 1906 the increasing importance of steam trawling received a temporary check. A steam trawler in those days would cost about £10,000 to construct and about £5,000 a year to operate; their commercial success, therefore, depended upon correspondingly large and valuable catches of fish being obtained. When first introduced on the fishing grounds round the coast their superior efficiency and speed amply compensated for their high cost. About 1900, however, the catch obtained by these vessels on the home fishing grounds began to diminish, and the fishermen became alarmed lest the greatly increased efficiency of steam trawling should prove to be its own undoing, and result in the depopulation of the fishing grounds by over-fishing. Between 1900 and 1906, the number of steam trawlers fishing from British ports only increased by 200, whereas, during the preceding 10 years, the numbers had increased from a few hundred to over 2,000. The anticipated exhaustion of the home grounds led to the steam trawler prospecting further afield. These longer voyages, as far as Iceland and the White Sea and Morocco, were very successful. The result of this was that larger steam trawlers were built, capable of undertaking There is no doubt that the rapid development of steam trawling was accelerated by the invention of the otter trawl. This is not only a larger net than the beam trawl, but is for all but small, flat fish, a much more efficient instrument. From the study of market statistics between the years 1889 and 1898 Garstang has calculated that a steamer caught on the average between four and seven times as much fish in the year as a sailing smack. Plan of Arrangements on and below Deck.—(I) On deck: 1. Winch. 2. Hatches. 3. Gallows. 4. Bollards. 5. Fish-pounds. 6. Steam-winch (for trawl). 7. Blocks. 8. Officers’ messroom. 9. Galley. 10. Ventilators. 11. Funnel. 12. Bunker-hatches. 13. Engine-room skylight. 14. Bathroom. 15. Mate’s cabin. 16. Lifeboat. Larger image (124 kB) A modern steam trawler is from 150 to 160 ft. long by 25 ft. beam and 12 ft. depth, constructed with a high bow and a low, flat stern. Her net tonnage is The ship carries nine hands, consisting of skipper, mate, boatswain, two deck hands, cook, two engineers and a fireman. On the fishing grounds, fishing is continuous. The net is trawled for from two to four hours, although on grounds where fish is plentiful (e.g. Iceland) the trawl is frequently hauled every half-hour. It is then hauled aboard, and the cod end containing the fish is swung over the deck. The cod line is unfastened so that the On smooth ground trawling is commercially possible at all depths down to 300 fathoms. In few cases, however, is trawling carried on at greater depths than 200 fathoms. Owing to the large amount of stores and repairs, etc., connected with the maintenance of a fleet of steam trawlers, most large owners maintain fairly elaborate premises in the neighbourhood of the fish dock. These premises generally consist of a net-making hall in which nets are made by women working with shuttles, a large bath of tar or tanning material below in which the net is soaked, also a wood yard and blacksmith’s shop, containing a steam hammer, a plumber’s shop, a boat-builder’s shop, a large store-room fitted with the necessary stores and spares. During the war the steam trawlers were commandeered by the Government for use as patrol boats and mine sweepers. It is estimated that 10 per cent of our steam trawlers and drifters and their crews were lost during the war. A.—The otter trawl. Larger image (187 kB) When steam trawling was first introduced it aroused general opposition, for there was not only the fear that their efficiency would lead to over-fishing in certain grounds, but it was said that the trawl, when dragged along the bottom, destroyed the eggs and killed the immature fish. The line fisherman found that steam trawling made it more difficult to catch demersal fish with baited hooks. He attributed this to the effect of over-fishing, but it is probable that contact with the otter trawls had made the fish rather more shy and, therefore, more difficult to catch by this method. It is unlikely that steam trawling will lead to serious over-fishing, Herring are caught with drift nets at night near the surface. In the daytime they frequent the sea bottom and can then be caught with a trawl net. Trawling for herrings was first practised by the fishermen of Milford Haven and Fleetwood in 1901. They used an ordinary otter trawl lined with a piece of herring net. A specially constructed herring trawl is now used, of which the cod end is made of 21/2 in. mesh instead of the usual 31/2 in. When trawling for herrings the steamer goes at full speed, generally for two to four hours, unless a shoal is encountered, when half-an-hour is frequently sufficient. Herrings are trawled in from 70 to 100 fathoms of water over a soft bottom. The main centre for trawled herrings is North-West of Ireland, other fisheries being carried on off the South-West of Ireland, the West of Scotland, and in the North Sea. In 1913 over 500,000 cwts. of herrings were taken with trawl nets in these areas. This method of catching herrings aroused serious opposition among the drift net fishermen. They asserted that the trawl catches and destroys a high proportion of immature fish, and also destroys the herring eggs as it passes along the sea bottom. In 1913 the matter was investigated by a Parliamentary Committee, but any Government action was checked by the outbreak of war. Since 1905 the trawling grounds frequented by British steam trawlers have been divided for statistical purposes into eighteen fishing areas. The names and areas of these regions are shown in the chart of the trawling grounds (Fig. 19). Table I shows in hundredweights the average catch per day’s absence from port in different areas. Frequented by British Trawlers, the “Regions” into which they are divided for statistical purposes, and the approximate area of each in square miles (Nautical) calculated from the 3 mile limit to the 200 metre line.
Larger image (383 kB)
In England and Wales more fish is landed by trawlers than by all other methods of fishing combined. Trawl-caught fish—soles, plaice, turbot, halibut, cod—are much more valuable than fish caught by drift nets, e.g. herring and mackerel. In England and Wales, in 1913, the weight of pelagic fish caught amounted to 389,262 tons, and of demersal fish 418,038 tons. Although the quantity of the demersal fish was, therefore, only little larger than of the pelagic fish, its value was £7,463,003, compared with £2,531,979, the value of the pelagic fish. |