Shrapnel—Plate 75. HEAD. Wound of entrance, left anterior parietal region. Wound of exit, none. The missile left a few small fragments spattered on the bone at point of entrance, with a slight deformation of the ball due to this cause, as shown in the plate. The distinct outline and normal size of the ball shows it to be very near the plate and on the left side of the head, while the enlarged and blurred image of the safety pin shows its position to be on the side of the head farther away from the plate. Emergency treatment is antiseptic dressing only. Subsequent treatment is directed to fragments and depression, without search for ball. Septic condition might indicate some later interference. Results in such cases are favorable if wound is not infected. Plate 76. _Shrapnel—Plate 76. HEAD. Wound of entrance, upper right and mid-parietal region. Wound of exit, none. The missile probably was deformed before striking the skull, upon which it was fragmented by impact, with several fragments following the internal contour of the vertex and others remaining spattered about the wound of entrance. It is probable that a larger mass of the shrapnel ball, causing the greater damage to the bone, ricocheted out of the wound. The distinct outline of the central safety pin and the less definite image of the shrapnel fragments show the wound to have been farther from the plate than the safety pin on the left side. The treatment is expectant, without search for the missile. Results in such cases are favorable, except for danger of infection. Plate 77. _Shrapnel—Plate 77. HEAD. Wound of entrance, external border of right supra-orbital ridge. Wound of exit, none. A few metallic fragments are seen where the missile lodged near the point of impact with the bone. The treatment is expectant. Removal of the ball from its superficial location is indicated if the wound is infected. Result in such cases is favorable. Plate 78. _Shrapnel—Plate 78. HEAD. Wound of entrance, upper posterior cheek, in front of the ear. Wound of exit, posterior to mastoid process, lacerated. The course of the missile was tangential, with the damage limited to the outer table of the mastoid. The metal particles scraped off of the ball by its contact with the bone mark the site of the wound. Treatment is expectant. Results are favorable. Plate 79. _Shrapnel—Plate 79. HEAD. Wound of entrance, below infraorbital ridge, with course through the mouth. Wound of exit, none. Missile left a few small metallic fragments spattered on the bone at the point of entrance. There is slight mark of deformity of the missile caused by its contact with the bone, shown in its shadow in the plate. The distinct outline and normal size of the ball shows it to have been on the side next to and near the plate. Treatment indicated is expectant. Results in such cases are favorable, as seat of probable infection is readily accessible. In this particular case, recovery followed with the ball left in situ, without causing the patient trouble enough to induce him to permit interference. Plate 80. _Shrapnel—Plate 80. HEAD. Wound of entrance, over the left internal super supra-orbital ridge, with course downward, slightly backward, and slightly to the left posterior nares. Wound of exit, none. The distinct outline and practically normal size of ball shows that the patient’s face was superimposed on the photographic plate, as the anterior location of the missile was suspected. The slight deformity of the ball is due to the impact with the bone. This personal case was received from the service of Prof. De Page, of the Belgian Red Cross Mission, at Josh Keshla Hospital, Constantinople, after an operation for infections of the frontal sinus, in which the anterior table was entirely removed, with free drainage into the posterior nares, before the radiograph was made or the exact location of the ball suspected. The missile is seen in the nares—very near the face—probably in the middle meatus, in the inferior turbinates, against the septum, deviated by its lodgment. Convalescence was finally established and the frontal-sinus wound practically closed when, without any subjective symptoms, an obstruction was objectively determined in the left posterior nares, suggesting the radiograph. The patient was so entirely free from any symptoms of the lodged missile that he wisely refused any meddlesome interference. He was discharged with sinus wound closed very remarkably without indication for plastic operation and with no symptoms. Plate 81. _Shrapnel—Plate 81. HEAD. This plate is a side view of the case in plate No. 80, showing the antero-posterior location of the ball. The indefinite outline and enlarged size of the ball shows the ball to have been farther away from the plate than in plate 80. Plate 82. _Shrapnel—Plate 82. UPPER EXTREMITY. The course of the missile was transverse from the posterior surface of the greater tuberosity of the humerus to the internal border of the scapula, distributing small metallic fragments along its path. There is no injury to the bone. The remnant of the ball has passed behind the scapula and lies near its superior angle. The treatment in such cases is, of course, conservative, with no serious consequences expected from infection. Plate 83. _Shrapnel—Plate 83. UPPER EXTREMITY. The course of the ball was transverse through the posterior border of the deltoid muscle without contact with the bone, which would have been revealed by small particles of lead scraped off from the ball. The actual size, normal outline, and great density of the shadow of the ball show that it lay next to the plate and that it is, therefore, lodged posterior and mesial to the glenoid portion of the scapula. The treatment is noninterference unless removal be indicated by pain, impairment of function, or infection. The results should always be good. Plate 84. _Shrapnel—Plate 84. UPPER EXTREMITY. The course of the bullet was from before backward and upward through the deltoid to the anterior surface of the head of the humerus. The missile is not the conventional shrapnel ball, which is spherical and about one-half inch in diameter, for the shadow shows a larger axis in one direction with parallel sides, too symmetrical to be attributed to deformation. The ballistic conditions are those of shrapnel. The missile struck the bone an inch or two below the point of lodgment. Its path is shown by particles of metal. Pain or interference with function would be cause for interference in subsequent treatment, which otherwise would be expectant. Plate 85. _Shrapnel—Plate 85. UPPER EXTREMITY. The missile lies behind the head of the humerus, under conditions similar to the cases shown in plates 83 and 84. The position of the hall is indicated by the outline and depth of shadow of the normal size of a shrapnel ball. The ball must therefore be very near the plate and behind the head of the humerus. There is no injury to the bone. The slight deformity of the ball was caused by ricochet before it caused the wound, as no particles of lead are seen on the bone to account for the impact of the missile. Plate 86. _Shrapnel—Plate 86. UPPER EXTREMITY. The ball ranged from before backward and upward, comminuting the outer half of the clavicle. The fragments have been removed. The particles of metal which mark the path of the ball lie in front of the acromion process of the scapula, because lack of density and indistinct outline of the shadows show them to be farther from the photographic plate than the spine of the scapula which rested on the plate, escaping the imminent danger of wounding the subclavian vessels. The treatment is conservative and results are favorable. Plate 87. _Shrapnel—Plate 87. UPPER EXTREMITY. The missile struck the bone and caused a long, splitting fracture, with some fragmentation of the proximal fragment. The wound could have been caused by either a ricocheted rifle bullet or by a deformed shrapnel ball, either projectile being the low velocity of long range. These conditions are more common to shrapnel wounds, but the appearance of the larger metal fragment leads to the suspicion that it is a piece of the jacket of a rifle bullet. The wound was not infected, and convalescence is well advanced, as is indicated by the callous formation. Plate 88. _Shrapnel—Plate 88. UPPER EXTREMITY. The missile struck the shaft of the humerus from an anterior and external direction and caused a long diagonal splitting fracture with fragmentation, in which the bone absorbed all of the energy of the missile at the seat of fracture. The missile lies in the anterior surface of the humerus, in two fragments; the smaller, much less distinct, is seen about an inch above the larger. The wound is not infected, and convalescence is well established, as is indicated by the callous formation, with overlapping of the fragments. The treatment in such cases is conservative and the results are favorable. Plate 89. _Shrapnel—Plate 89. UPPER EXTREMITY. The course of the missile was from behind forward and outward, striking the bone on the posterior surface, causing a fracture with fragmentation, and lacerating the wound of exit with fragments of bones and with its own deformation. The wound of exit is indicated in the plate. The wound is infected. Fragments of the missile lie on the posterior surface of the bone, as indicated by their dense shadow and distinct outline. The treatment in such cases is conservative and the results are favorable. Plate 90. _Shrapnel—Plate 90. UPPER EXTREMITY. The course of the missile was transverse from without inward, with a transverse fracture and fragmentation. This wound might have been caused by either a shrapnel ball or a deformed rifle bullet, but the distribution of the metallic fragments rather indicate the course of a shrapnel ball. The metallic fragments lie farther from the plate than the safety pin of the dressing, which, therefore, lies behind the bone and the fragments of the missile lie in front. The treatment in such cases is conservative and the results are favorable. The subsequent course may indicate interference for mal-union. Plate 91. _Shrapnel—Plate 91. UPPER EXTREMITY. The course of the missile has been from without inward. The fragments of metal marking the path of the missile lie farther from the plate on the outer than on the inner side. This would indicate the former to be in front of the bone and the latter to be behind. The wound could have been caused by either a deformed rifle bullet or by a shrapnel ball, but the distribution of metallic fragments along the track of the missile rather indicates the agent to have been a shrapnel ball. The case is similar in course and results to that shown in the preceding plate 90. Plate 92. _Shrapnel—Plate 92. UPPER EXTREMITY. The missiles, shrapnel balls deformed by ricochet, were multiple, with a course from without inward and diagonally downward. The streaks of metal particles along the seat of fracture indicates the path of a shrapnel ball or fragment from the point of impact to the lower fragment of the fracture, where several deformed shrapnel fragments are lodged. Multiple wounds by shrapnel are common. The wounds of entrance were small. There was no wound of exit. The wound was not infected. This is another evidence that does not defend the inference that ricocheted missiles are prone to introduce elements of infection into a wound. The plaster dressing does not seem to meet the indications for support of the fracture. The treatment is conservative in such cases. Results are favorable. Plate 93. _Shrapnel—Plate 93. UPPER EXTREMITY. The course of the missile was transverse, from without inward and downward, striking the shaft of the bone squarely and producing a characteristic “butterfly” fracture, with a separation of the fragments. The exposure was made with the ulnar side of the arm next to the plate, indicated by the clear outline of the internal condyle and the olecranon. The nearly normal size of the shadow of the shrapnel ball shows it to be near the plate, and therefore to lie on the inside of the humerus. The irregular outline of the ball and the metallic fragments spattered about indicate that the ball was deformed by the detachment of fragments on direct impact with the bone. The wound is not infected. The treatment is conservative in such cases and the results are good. Plate 94. _Shrapnel—Plate 94. UPPER EXTREMITY. The course of the missile was from behind forward, causing a transverse fracture of the humerus with some fragmentation. The wound is in a state of established convalescence, with considerable separation of the ends of the large fragments and without infection, shown by the formation of callus and by an attempt at union in faulty position. The trail of the metallic fragments of the missile from behind forward and their location near the anterior surface of the arm indicate the course of the missile, either a rifle bullet or a shrapnel ball—most probably the latter, as the lead core of the rifle ball, protected by the jacket, does not break up into as many small particles as does the shrapnel ball. The missile was deformed by ricochet before striking the bone. The early treatment in such cases is conservative, although the subsequent course may indicate interference for malposition. The results are favorable. Plate 95. _Shrapnel—Plate 95. UPPER EXTREMITY. The course of the missile was from before backward. The missile consisted of two large fragments of a richocheted shrapnel ball, almost spent in energy before striking the arm, as its penetration was just enough to pass through the soft parts and strike the humerus, causing a fissure without separation of fragments. The wound was clean. The treatment in such cases is naturally conservative. [The epiphysis of the olecranon being so distinct and showing no fusion, indicates the youth of this soldier, whose age could not have been more than 16 years.] Plate 96. _Rifle—Plate 96. UPPER EXTREMITY. The missile was a rifle bullet with the reduced velocity of long range, passing transversely along the articulations of the elbow, fragmenting the radius and ulna and fissuring the humerus through both condyles. The emergency treatment is antiseptic dressing and immobilization, with prompt transportation to the base. Subsequent treatment is conservative, with proper immobilization. Results as to limb are favorable, with probable loss of function of the elbow. Plate 97. _Shrapnel—Plate 97. UPPER EXTREMITY. The course of the missile was superficial, downward and outward from above the internal condyle of the right humerus to the wound of exit over the internal border of the ulna. Metal fragments of the missile have lodged against the tip of the olecranum, with no fracture and with no damage to the joint. The low velocity of the missile, producing so slight a bone injury and the track of lead particles along the line of contact with the bones determines it to have been a shrapnel ball. The wound was not infected. The treatment in such cases is naturally conservative and the results are very favorable. Plate 98. _Shrapnel—Plate 98. UPPER EXTREMITY. The course of the ball was from before backward, striking the lower end of the humerus squarely above and internal to the external condyle and splitting off the condyles with a line of fracture extending through the capitellum, without much separation of the fragment. As the impact was direct, the energy producing such effect was that of low velocity. The great radiographic penetration shown in this plate gives the shadows of the ball great distinctness and definite outline, especially in the line of fracture, although its opposite border is not in such sharp contrast. This appearance, together with the very slight enlargement, leads to the suspicion that the ball lies posteriorly, but a larger metal fragment, below the ball, is less clear and suggests a position anterior to the bone. With the posterior surface of the arm next to the plate and with but little difference in the distance from the plate to either the anterior or posterior surface of the bone, it is not easy to determine the location of the ball in the anteroposterior direction, but it would seem to be on the anterior surface of the bone. The wound is not infected. The treatment is conservative and results favorable. The subsequent course would probably indicate the removal of a foreign body from a site so near the joint. Plate 99. _Shrapnel—Plate 99. UPPER EXTREMITY. Same wound as in plate 98. The sharp holder of the greater sigmoid cavity and the head of the radius fully obscured by the coracoid process indicate, that in this exposure, the ulnar side of the arm was next to the plate. With this condition and the enlarged shadow of the ball, the latter must lie a little distance away from the plate, and, actually, on the radial side of the humerus. The position of the ball in the anteroposterior line is manifest, and its position confirms the deductions made therefrom in the preceding plate (98). Plate 100. _Shrapnel—Plate 100. UPPER EXTREMITY. The primary condition of this wound is not manifest from the appearance of the plate, which reveals only a destruction of the joint by fracture and an advanced stage of infection, involving the fragments and lower end of the shaft of the humerus, as indicated by the rarefaction of these parts. Several fragments of the missile are in evidence; it is probable that others have escaped with drainage. Drainage tubes are seen in the lower arm and upper forearm. The primary conservative treatment has been continued through two or three months. The case is from GulhanÉ Military Hospital, where the scientific character of surgical service already referred to must lead to the inference that all the surgical indications have been met in the management of the case. Plate 101. _Shrapnel—Plate 101. UPPER EXTREMITY. The course of the missile was from within outward, striking the ulna a glancing blow just above the styloid process, fracturing the anterior surface, and then striking the internal border of the radius and causing a slight notching fracture with a longitudinal fissure. The forearm lies in supination, with its posterior surface next to the plate. As the outline of the missile, as well as of the bone, is blurred, there is not enough differentiation in the shadows to indicate the anterior or posterior location of the missile with reference to the radius. The shrapnel ball struck the bone with low velocity, as all of its remaining energy, absorbed by the two small bones, caused little damage and practically no displacement of fragments. The wound was not infected. The treatment in such cases is, of course, conservative. Results are uniformly good. Plate 102. _Shrapnel—Plate 102. UPPER EXTREMITY. A fragmented shrapnel ball, coursing from without inward, struck the upper third of the shaft of the radius and caused a green-stick fracture. A fragment of the ball, larger than those seen in the plate, inflicted the greater damage and escaped through the wound of exit, to be seen below the large fragment on the left of the plate. The olecranon process of the right ulna rests on the photographic plate, with the forearm in semipronation, so that the shadow of the radius falls nearly in line with that of the ulna. With the forearm restored to the anatomical position, the spattered metallic fragments, now seen lying over and to the left of the radius, would then be shown lying on the outer border of and posterior to the radius, except for the upper right metallic fragment, now lying over the ulna, which would be seen lying over the anterior surface of the radius. The six pellets seen in the lower forearm have not contributed to the injury of the bone. Their density and indefinite outline indicate a position in the forearm opposite to the side next to the plate. With the forearm in supination they would appear in their real position, in front of the ulna and on the outside of the radius. Plate 103. _Shrapnel—Plate 103. UPPER EXTREMITY. The missile in its course from behind forward and from above downward left a trail of its metal particles along the line of its first contact until the bone yielded to the pressure in a transverse fracture. The arm lies in slight pronation with the longitudinal ridges of the dorsal surface of the ulna, shown distinctly next to the photographic plate. The upper end of the lower radial fragment, shown as overlying the ulna, is inclined forward in the anatomical position. The metal particles are on the outer and posterior border of the radius. The treatment in such cases is conservative. Results as to function are uncertain. Plate 104. _Shrapnel—Plate 104. UPPER EXTREMITY. The course of the missile was tangential along side of the upper end of the ulna and internal condyle of the humerus, with a splitting effect on the ulna, which formed three fragments by breaking off the olecranon, and one lateral fragment from the shaft of the bone without displacement. The line of metallic particles shows the path of the ball in its slight contact with the bones, beginning on the side of the ulna and extending along the side of the internal condyle from where the ball escaped through the skin. The wound, not infected, was treated as simple fracture. A few fine lines on the plate above the fracture are due to scratches on the negative. Results in such cases should be good. Plate 105. _Shrapnel—Plate 105. UPPER EXTREMITY. The course of the missile was from the outer border of the hypothnear eminence diagonally downward through the palm, lodging against the second metacarpal bone with fracture of last four metacarpals. The metal particles are not seen on the fourth and fifth metacarpals because the violence at these points was transmitted through soft parts, but the projectile spent its remaining energy directly against the second and third metacarpals. The palm of the hand was next to the photographic plate, as indicated by the immediate contact of the thumb. The shadow of the bones is not dense, but in deep contrast with the shadows of the ball and metal fragments, which are so clearly outlined with the ball of normal size that the ball is thus shown to lie on the palmar side of the hand. The treatment is conservative, with judicious interference when opportunity shall offer for removal of the missile. Plate 106. _Shrapnel—Plate 106. UPPER EXTREMITY. The palm of the hand lies next to the plate. The ball is very slightly enlarged and the small metal fragments are indistinct, indicating that they and the ball lie on the back of the hand. The ball struck the third knuckle and lodged beneath the skin between the fourth and fifth metacarpals, fracturing both bones without displacement of fragments. In the recent wound the condition would be apparent, but after days of inflammatory reaction and infection, the swelling is too great to make any determination by palpation. The treatment is removal of the missile. Good results regularly follow. Plate 107. _Shrapnel—Plate 107. UPPER EXTREMITY. The hand lies with its ulnar side next to the plate, as is indicated by the sharp outline of the swollen hypothenar eminence, nearer the plate than the thumb, with the enlarged, poorly defined, and rarefied shadow of its metacarpal and phalanges. As the normal size of the balls and the clear outline of the metal fragments must place them almost in contact with the plate, the ball is located near the fifth metacarpal. As this is the same case as is shown in plate 106, the conclusions drawn from each plate are confirmed by the other. The wound is infected, as indicated by the swelling of the palm. The treatment is removal of the missile, with management of the infection. Plate 108. _Shrapnel—Plate 108. UPPER EXTREMITY. The shadow of the hand is shown with the palm next to the plate, as indicated by the small, well-defined outline of the first metacarpal lying within the outline of the larger and less-defined shadow of the second metacarpal. The third finger is flexed at the first phalangeal joint, and the end of the second phalanx is outlined in deeper shadow, with its long axis vertical to the plate. The position raises the first finger from the plate and very slightly enlarges the size of the shadow of the bullet, although it retains its sharp outline. The shadow of the ball being very nearly the normal size, the ball lies on the palmar side of the third metacarpo-phalangeal joint. It entered the hand on the outer border of the base of the first finger, and left a fragment of metal on its slight contact with the bone. The ball was deformed by ricochet before striking the hand, with almost completely spent velocity. The wound is infected. The treatment is the management of infection. Plate 109. _Shrapnel—Plate 109. UPPER EXTREMITY. The hand lay with the palmar surface next to the plate. The distinct outline of the small metal fragments and the natural size of the shadow of the undeformed shrapnel ball show that they lay on the anterior side of the metacarpus. The arrangements of the metal particles and bone fragments and the indication of the point of entrance of one wound on the outer border of the metacarpal of the thumb indicate the course of the balls to have been from the radial to the ulna side of the palm. The undeformed ball, then, lies, most probably, in front of the second metacarpal. The deformed ball shows, in its enlarged shadow and not so distinct in outline as the normal ball, that it is on the dorsal surface of the third and fourth metacarpals. The undeformed ball caused the fracture of the phalanx and metacarpal of the thumb; the deformed ball fractured the neck of the third metacarpal; a ball which escaped from the wound and touched the base of the first phalanx of the middle finger and fractured the first phalanx of the little finger; and another ball, which glanced along the anterior surface of the lower end of the shaft of the radius and left a deposit of metal to mark its course, also escaped from the ulnar border of the forearm at a point indicated in the plate. Four balls were concerned with this wound; two of them have lodged with some damage and two others have escaped, after inflicting a slight injury. Multiple shrapnel wounds are common. It may be said that the greater the number of balls lodged in a given area the less the distance of the plane from the apex of the cone of dispersion of a shrapnel discharge. Several shrapnel balls, lodged in a small area without causing much damage or exhibiting much power of penetration, indicate low velocity at close range of shrapnel balls on discharge from the shrapnel envelope. In a personal case, eight shrapnel balls were removed from a forearm. CHEST.Plate 110. _Shrapnel—Plate 110. CHEST. The posterior chest wall is next to the plate, as the posterior rib shadows are much more distinct and much smaller than the shadows of the anterior ribs. The shadow of the ball is blurred, which shows that it moved with respiration and is, therefore, probably in the lung. The shadow is only slightly enlarged and is fairly dense, which indicates it to be not far from the ribs and, therefore, in the posterior portion of the lung. The treatment of such cases is conservative; infection is not common; hÆmothorax pleurisy, empyema, pneumonia, and pulmonary abscess are most frequent complications, named in the order of frequency. Pulmonary abscess is very rare. Pneumonia was seen in a personal case. Plate 111. _Shrapnel—Plate 111. CHEST. While the missile is not a shrapnel ball, it presents similar conditions and does not need to be separately classified. The vertebral border of the scapula is distinctly shown in light shadow, indicating its position near the plate. The outline of the missile is so distinct and the shadow so dense that it must lie near the plate, and is located superficially in the infraspinatus fossa. Plate 112. _Shrapnel—Plate 112. CHEST. The back of the patient lay on the plate, as is indicated by the normal size of the ribs behind and the exaggerated outline in front. The ball struck the sixth rib behind and caused a fracture at the angle. It then continued its course to the axilla. The normal size of the shadow of the ball indicates that it lies superficially behind the head of the humerus. The wound of the rib was infected superficially, and the secretion of the wound carried away the most of the metal particles which the ball in striking deposited on impact. Plate 113. _Shrapnel—Plate 113. CHEST. There is no wound of the bone. The ball lies in the axilla, behind, not close to, the plate, because the density of the shadow is not very great and the size is slightly enlarged. The distance from the plate is probably that of the mid-axillary line. The wound is not infected. Pain and impaired movement of the arm suggested localization of the missile and indicate removal in the subsequent course of treatment. Plate 114. _Shrapnel—Plate 114. CHEST. The posterior chest wall lay next to the plate. The almost normal size of the shadow of the ball indicates that it lies near the plate, and the blurred outline shows that it has moved with the chest in respiration. The ball lies, therefore, in the posterior axilla near the middle of the outer border of the scapula, imbedded in the thoracic muscles. The treatment is expectant. Such wounds are rarely infected. Pain or impairment of function only would indicate removal of the missile from a clean wound. PELVIS.Plate 115. _Shrapnel—Plate 115. PELVIS. As the wound was received while the soldier was lying prone, the course of the missile in the body was from above downward, striking the crest of the ilium, on which it was fragmented, and trailing its fragments as far down as the great trochanter. The injury to the ilium was a crushing fracture, with the displacement of small fragments from the antero-superior spine. As the sacrum was next to the photographic plate, the missile, judging from its indistinct shadow, lies farther from the plate and in front of the bone. The relative distinctness of the large fragment seen on the wing of the ilium indicates its probable position to be on the outside of the ilium. The trail of the smaller metal fragments lies between the antero-superior spine and the great trochanter, anterior to the plane of the femur. The treatment in such cases is always conservative. LOWER EXTREMITY.Plate 116. _Shrapnel—Plate 116. LOWER EXTREMITY. With the posterior aspect of the thigh lying next to the plate, the very greatly enlarged shadow of the deformed shrapnel ball indicates that it lies a relatively great distance from the plate, so that its location can be determined to be near the internal border of the adductor muscles, anteriorly, and below the transverse plane of the lesser trochanter. Plate 117. _Shrapnel—Plate 117. LOWER EXTREMITY. With the sacrum lying next to the plate, the normal size, clear outline, and dense shadow of the shrapnel ball indicates its position to be near the plate. The location can be roughly estimated as the superficial gluteal region, external to the ramus of the ischium and near the aerior plane of the upper border of the acetabular cavity. Plate 118. _Shrapnel—Plate 118. LOWER EXTREMITY. The normal size, distinct outline, and considerable density of the shadow of the shrapnel ball show that it lies very near the plate, posterior to the bone and in the buttocks, quite superficially. The treatment in such cases is always conservative. Pain or impairment of function indicate removal after convalescence. Plate 119. _Shrapnel—Plate 119. LOWER EXTREMITY. The direct subtrochanteric impact disintegrated the missile and delivered all of its energy to the bone, with a resulting transverse fracture of the upper end of the shaft of the femur and longitudinal fragmentation of the shaft. The course of the shrapnel ball was from behind forward and from above downward, as is shown by the track of the metal fragments and the lodgment of a larger lead fragment on the shaft below the seat of fracture. The uppermost large lead fragment, as shown by the depth of its shadow, lies farther behind the bone and nearer to the photographic plate than do the other pieces of the ball, as indicated by their lighter shadows. All of the fragments seem to lie behind the bone. The conservative treatment of this wound is justified by the attempt at repair, as indicated by the callus formation; but it is manifest, from the extremely faulty position, that the indication for immobilization and extension in strong abduction were not appreciated. Proper management of conservative treatment in such cases gives good results. Plate 120. _Shrapnel—Plate 120. LOWER EXTREMITY. The position of the femur is in outward rotation, as shown by the full shadow of the lesser trochanter and the vanishing of the greater trochanter behind the shoulder of the neck. The two larger missiles lie on the outer side of the bone and the others lie in front on the seat of fracture. The greatly deformed shrapnel balls and the slight chipping fracture of the femur indicate that the greater portion of the striking energy of the missiles was so dissipated in ricochet that but little force was left for attack on the bone. The treatment in such cases is expectant and indication rarely arises for search for and removal of the missiles. Plate 121. _Shrapnel—Plate 121. LOWER EXTREMITY. The course of the shrapnel ball was from within outward, striking the femur with the energy of high (shrapnel) velocity, with fragmentation of the missile by impact on the bone. The largest fragment, by the distinct outline of its shadow, lies close to the plate and behind the bone; a smaller metal fragment has been carried to the outer border of the thigh, where it lies superficially; another fragment lies in the seat of fracture. The position of fragments is faulty, as the indications for extension and abduction have not been wholly met, although this is a case from the well-conducted service of GulhanÉ Hospital. The treatment in such cases is conservative and the results are good. Plate 122. _Shrapnel—Plate 122. LOWER EXTREMITY. The shrapnel ball, in its almost directly antero-posterior course from behind forward, has delivered the energy of high (shrapnel) velocity to the bone, which had absorbed it all in stopping the missile, with a resulting approach to a butterfly fracture with displacement of fragments. The upper end of the lower fragment lies nearer to the plate than to the lower end of the upper fragment, with the deformed shrapnel ball lying behind the latter, closer to the plate. The treatment in such cases is conservative, with good results to follow except as they may be imperiled by infection. Plate 123. _Shrapnel—Plate 123. LOWER EXTREMITY. While the missile in this case may have been other than a shrapnel ball, the fracture is one produced by the impact of a missile delivering great striking energy, with a predominant cross-section factor in its composition. The fragments are due to the application of an energy in which the mass was distributed over a relatively large area on bone, which resulted in the displacement of the large fragments. The treatment in such cases is conservative. Results are favorable; infection is generally controlled. Plate 124. _Shrapnel—Plate 124. LOWER EXTREMITY. The direct impact of two shrapnel balls, delivering all of their energy to the femur, resulted in a fracture with large fragments. The exposure was made through a plaster splint, and shows a faulty position with progressing repair. The treatment in such cases is conservative, but with respect for the indications to maintain proper position of the fragments. Plate 125. _Shrapnel—Plate 125. LOWER EXTREMITY. The condition shown in the plate is the characteristic result of direct impact of a projectile of low velocity and great sectional area in which all of the energy is delivered to the bone against which it lodges. The distinct outline and dense shadow of the deformed missile indicates its position to be behind the bone. The callus formation indicates the favorable progress of repair, but with the fragments in faulty position. The treatment in such cases is conservative, with proper respect to the principles of maintenance of normal relation of the fragments. Plate 126. _Shrapnel—Plate 126. LOWER EXTREMITY. The course of the shrapnel ball was antero-posterior, with an impact on the shaft of the femur, which fragmented both the ball and bone through the imparting or the entire striking energy of the ball to the bone by the lodgment of the ball. The sharp outline and density of the shadows of the missile, in contrast with the dense shadows of the bone, indicate that the missile lies closer to the plate than does the bone, although the flattened ball does not permit a comparison between its shadow and the normal size of the ball. The advanced stage of convalescence is shown by the formation of callous. The treatment in such cases is conservative and the results are good if proper position can be maintained. Plate 127. _Shrapnel—Plate 127. LOWER EXTREMITY. The impact of the missile was delivered with the energy of high (shrapnel) velocity at close range, as is indicated by the signs of another shrapnel wound, just above the outer tuberosity (in the lower left corner of the plate), where a deposit of metallic particle is evidenced. The fragmentation of the missile, through its contact with the bone, indicates the great striking force of a missile which ricocheted from the bone. The general distribution of metallic particles through a wound of this class indicates certainly that the missile was unjacketed, and the destructive forces show that its sectional area was relatively larger, i. e., a shrapnel ball. The hard metal jacket of a rifle bullet would not give off its particles in contact with the bone unless it were so greatly deformed as to have almost entirely lost its jacket. In this state the energy of a rifle ball must be so greatly reduced, through the violence of ricochet, that it would not retain enough striking force to cause its disintegration on impact with the bone. Besides, some particles of the jacket could be identified, as they are always bent or twisted so that their character is recognized in the shadow. Plate 128. _Shrapnel—Plate 128. LOWER EXTREMITY. The slight enlargement and moderate density of the shadow of the projectile indicates a position a short distance from the plate. A slight shadow dependent from the external condyle on the outside of the ball and a metallic marking just outside of the upper contour of the outer tuberosity indicate an injury to the joint and the path of the ball from above the outer tuberosity into the joint capsule. The probabilities are that the ball lies between the head of the tibia and the patellar notch of the femur, but the absolute certainty of this deduction must be supported by an exposure in a lateral plane, which is shown in plate 129. Plate 129. _Shrapnel—Plate 129. LOWER EXTREMITY. As the fibular shadow is about the normal size and clearly outlined, the fibular side of the leg lay next to the plate. As the shadow of the ball is dense and not much enlarged, it must lie near the plate. A light shadow in front of the ball, which shows the anterior crucial ligament, and a metallic marking above the patella, suggests the path of the ball. As this is a lateral projection of the same case that is shown in plate 128 in an antero-posterior projection, these conclusions are thus verified. The missile lies in the joint capsule between the head of the tibia, in front of the spine, and the patellar notch of the femur. As a foreign body in the knee joint which seriously interferes with its function, removal is indicated when surgical facilities are at hand. The results in such cases are usually good. Plate 130. _Shrapnel—Plate 130. LOWER EXTREMITY. The line of projection of the shadow is directed obliquely from behind, focussed on the internal aspect of the knee, with the fibula next to the plate. As the shadow of the shrapnel ball is much enlarged and not very dense, the ball must lie some distance from the plate and away from the fibular side of the joint. As the distances through the knee joint are about the same in all cases and as shrapnel balls are approximately the same size, it is evident that the ball lies farther away from the plate than it does in plate 129, where it is about the middle of a transverse line through the joint. It must lie, therefore, superficially between the head of the tibia and the internal condyle of the femur. Removal is indicated under favorable surgical conditions. Infection of the joint may occasionally indicate drainage and removal as emergency treatment. Results, except for infection, are good. Plate 131. _Shrapnel—Plate 131. LOWER EXTREMITY. That the knee is not fully extended is shown by the exaggerated outline of the tibial head. The enlarged and only fair density of the shadow indicates that the shrapnel ball lies some distance away from the plate. As the bone is not injured, the missile must lie either in front of or behind the femur, and its enlarged shadow shows the position to be in front of the femur, just above the articular surface, and probably within the reflection of the capsular ligament. A comparison with the size of the shadows of the balls shown in plates 128 and 130 will show this one to be greater than the former and less than the latter, and so it must bear about the same relation in the distance from the plate. This would account for the location in front instead of behind the femur. The treatment is conservative, and removal is indicated when function is disturbed. Plate 132. _Shrapnel—Plate 132. LOWER EXTREMITY. The fibular side of the leg lay next to the photographic plate, as shown by the enlarged fainter outline of the internal tuberosity. The shadow of the shrapnel ball is neither as normal in size as that of the external condyle nor as exaggerated as that of the internal condyle, and the position is probably neither as close to the plate as the former nor as far away as the latter. The missiles lie about the middle of the anterior surface of the lower end of the femur, above the articular surface. Plate 133. _Shrapnel—Plate 133. LOWER EXTREMITY. The ball struck the outer condyle just above the articular surface with only enough energy to damage and slightly crack the bone. The injury to the bone and the metallic mark of the impact can be seen just above the outer border of the articular cartilage of the outer condyle. Plate 134. _Shrapnel—Plate 134. LOWER EXTREMITY. The outer tuberosity lay next to the photographic plate, with the knot in the localizing wire on the inside of the leg and farther away from the plate. The line of projection is transversely through the tuberosities. The shadow of the ball, as it is somewhat enlarged, not sharply defined, and of medium density, must lie about midway between the lines of the localizing wire or in the popliteal space just above and between the tuberosities, much nearer the popliteal surface than the bone. An accurate localization of the ball in a transverse line, however, would require an exposure of another plate in an antero-posterior line, but in this actual case the localization of the ball had to be made from this single plate, as only one exposure was made. The ball struck the border of the popliteal space of the femur just above the tuberosity, without energy enough to cause a fracture, deform the ball, or even to leave, as a mark of contact, metal particles of the ball. Plate 135. _Shrapnel—Plate 135. LOWER EXTREMITY. The posterior surface of the leg lay next to the plate, as shown by the outline of the head of the fibula, but any estimate of distance from the plate, based on depth of the shadows, is of little value because there is no contrast between localizing-wire shadows in front of and behind the leg. The slightly enlarged shadow of the ball indicates it to be farther from the plate than it would be if it lay behind the fibula. As the shadows of the metal fragments on the tibia are not sharp enough to indicate their position to be near the plate, the ball has lodged anteriorly between the tibia and fibula after ricocheting from the anterior surface of the tibia. The ball, being undeformed, struck the tibia with so little force that it barely penetrated the skin. The reaction of infection in such wounds makes a diagnosis on physical examination difficult and indicates radiography. Plate 136. _Shrapnel—Plate 136. LOWER EXTREMITY. The leg lay with its posterior surface next to the photographic plate. The enlarged shadow of the ball and the blurred outlines of the metal fragments require them to be some distance from the plate and therefore on the anterior surface of the tibia. The impact has been from within outward with so little energy that the ball only touched the internal border of the tibia and lodged beneath the skin. Without the reaction of inflammation and infection, diagnosis could be made by palpation, but extensive swelling indicates radiography. Plate 137. _Shrapnel—Plate 137. LOWER EXTREMITY. The fibular side of the leg lay next to the plate, as the distinct and not exaggerated outlines of the fibula can be seen in the dense shadow of the tibia. The wound, as indicated by the callous tissue, is shown in a state of repair, after the larger detached fragments of the fracture had been removed. The wound was caused by a missile carrying considerable energy. The small particles of metal marking the course of the missile show it was a shrapnel ball. Plate 138. _Shrapnel—Plate 138. LOWER EXTREMITY. This plate shows a type of wound caused by a number of fragments of a shrapnel ball or other similar missile. The missile was deformed by a near-by ricochet, from which large and small fragments struck simultaneously and distributed themselves over a large area. The larger fragments carried enough energy to fracture the bone by transmitting all of their energy in lodgment and by possibly breaking up into smaller fragments. In this case the energy of the missile was transmitted to the tibia, with fracture and great fragmentation of the bone. The fracture of the tibia was secondary, resulting from indirect violence, due to the loss of the support of the tibia. Plate 139. _Shrapnel—Plate 139. LOWER EXTREMITY. The course of the missile was from within outward and from before backward, striking both the fibula and the tibia, with fragmentation and displacement of both bones. The fibula lay next to the plate, as indicated by its distinct normal shadow and the exaggerated outline of the internal malleolus. The trail of metal fragments is typical of a shrapnel ball with the energy of high shrapnel velocity, but any lead missile without a protective jacket, under like conditions, might have produced the same effect. The treatment is conservative until some positive indication arising in the course of an infection directs interference. Plate 140. _Shrapnel—Plate 140. LOWER EXTREMITY. As the heel lay on the plate it is easy to identity the tibia and fibula of the left leg. The course of the ball from the internal malleolus across to the lower end of the tibia and fibula is well marked by the trail of metal particles left by the contact of the ball with the bones. The indistinctness of the shadows of the lead particles and of the ball and the very slight enlargement of the ball indicates a contact with the anterior surface of the tibia and of the fibula with lodgment of the ball beneath the skin at the anterior border of the lower end of the fibula. The remaining energy of the missile was almost entirely spent on the tibia, causing a long oblique fracture, so that the contact with the fibula resulted in a crack only, without the separation of a fragment. The treatment in such cases is conservative, with the subsequent removal of the ball from its superficial location. Plate 141. _Shrapnel—Plate 141. LOWER EXTREMITY. The course of the ball was from without and behind, ranging upward and inward, striking the tibia on the outer border, and causing a splitting fracture without displacement of fragments. The missile was most probably deformed by ricochet before it struck the bone, as there is too little bone injury to account for the spattering and wide distribution of the fragments by the direct impact of an undeformed ball. Two metallic fragments lying over the fibula were probably additional missiles detached from the ball as it ricocheted near the wound. The treatment in such cases would be conservative, while meeting the indications of infection. Plate 142. _Shrapnel—Plate 142. LOWER EXTREMITY. This plate furnishes another example of the fragmentation of a shrapnel ball by ricochet on a near-by object before striking the body. A slight fracture of the fibula is seen (at the top of the plate) with the lodgment of multiple missiles over a wide area, without other injury to the bones. The fragments seen through the shadow of the tibia lie nearer the plate than the smaller fragments on the fibula. As the largest fragment, lying below, shows a much enlarged semicircular outline, its position is not close to the plate and it must lie superficially on the inner side of the leg. Plate 143. _Shrapnel—Plate 143. LOWER EXTREMITY. This plate shows the right leg, because the calf always rests on the plate in the absence of a contraindication, which does not occur in this case, and because the slight angle of approach of the tibia and fibula identifies the relation of the lower end of these bones. The nature of the fracture, without much fragmentation and with no displacements of fragments, indicates a slight striking energy of the missile, which was disintegrated by ricochet before striking the bone. The fragments of a shrapnel ball, spattered on a near-by object, struck the leg in front over a wide area, as indicated by the fragments lying over the tibia and smaller ones lying on the inside of the bone. The larger metal fragment, on the fibula, is some distance from the plate, and probably lies in front of the bone, while the smaller ones, seen in sharper outline, lie behind. Plate 144. _Shrapnel—Plate 144. LOWER EXTREMITY. This is another example of the condition, shown in plate 143, in which a shrapnel hall or similar missile is disintegrated by ricochet before a fleeting the wound. By comparison of the shadows of the missiles with the shadows of the portion of the localizing wire lying nearer the plate (shown more deeply and distinctly), and with the portion lying in front of the leg, it can be concluded that the fragments lie superficially in front of the bones. A slight fissure fracture of the fibula may be seen in the upper portion of the plate. Plate 145. _Shrapnel—Plate 145. LOWER EXTREMITY. The fibular side of the leg lay next to the plate. The sharp outline, great density, and normal size of the shadow of the shrapnel ball shows the ball almost in contact with the plate. The metallic particles marking the contact of the ball and the fibula, at the seat of a diagonal fracture, without displacement of fragments, are shown so distinctly that they must also be near the plate. The course of the ball, therefore, was from without, ranging inward and upward with the slight energy of long (shrapnel) range. The ball lies on the fibular side superficially, just in front of the fibula. Plate 146. _Shrapnel—Plate 146. LOWER EXTREMITY. The plate exposed with the tibial side down shows the wound in the course of treatment, with a drainage tube in position after the detached fragments of several inches of the fibula have been removed on account of infection. Several fragments of the missile are shown on the lower fragment of the fibula. Conservative treatment is evident and good results should follow. Plate 147. _Shrapnel—Plate 147. LOWER EXTREMITY. As the heel lay next to the photographic plate, the right ankle is easily identified. The clear shadows of even the very small metallic particles show them also next to the plate and, therefore, on the posterior surface of the external malleolus, where a shrapnel ball at extremely low velocity struck and produced a slight fracture, or more of a fissure, without separation of fragment. The joint mortise is intact, as the line of fracture does not extend to the articular surface. The shrapnel ball in such cases would lie just beneath the skin or escape through an adjacent wound. Plate 148. _Shrapnel—Plate 148. LOWER EXTREMITY. As the heel lies next to the plate, the left ankle is easily identified. The course of the missile is shown by a metallic track from the internal to the external malleolus, and by a point of greater contact with the internal malleolus at the upper border of its articulation with the astragulus, resulting in an oblique fracture, separating the tip of the external malleolus. At the point of first impact the posterior faciculus of the internal lateral ligament was severed. The missile therefore passed directly through the ankle joint, entering just behind the tip of the external malleolus, coursing over the posterior portion of the superior tibial articulation of the astragalus in front of the tendo Achillis to strike the upper articular surface of the external malleolus, with the resulting fracture. By this mechanism, the joint mortise has been widened by outward displacement of the external malleolus, while the rupture of the internal lateral ligament permitted the outward rotation of the astragulus, thus producing rather faithfully, by direct violence, a condition which might be called a “simulated Pott’s fracture” of the first degree. By the metallic path of the missile it is known that its soft metal mass was not protected by a hard metal jacket; by the slight damage done to the bone, which lay directly in its path, its velocity and consequent energy are revealed as very slight; by the absence of larger metallic fragments it is shown that the missile was not deformed nor robbed of its energy through ricochet; and as only these conditions can be furnished by a lead ball, undeformed and traveling at low velocity, the missile was a shrapnel ball. Plate 149. _Shrapnel—Plate 149. LOWER EXTREMITY. This plate exhibits the characteristic marking of the metal particles of a shrapnel ball scraped off by contact with the bone, showing the course of the ball in relation to the bone. The evidence that two shrapnel balls struck the tibia without causing a fracture indicates that the velocity of shrapnel balls is, sometimes at least, very low and that this low velocity may occur at a comparatively short range from the point where the shrapnel balls are discharged from the chamber or near the apex of the “cone of dispersion.” Such multiple wounds are caused before the balls have been so widely dispersed as when they arrive at the base of the “cone of dispersion.” Plate 150. _Shrapnel—Plate 150. LOWER EXTREMITY. The external border of the foot lay next to the plate, as is shown by the articulation of the cuboid. A fragment detached from the posterior inferior border of the astragalus and several small metal particles lying behind the fragment are in evidence. The enlarged shadow of the ball indicates that it does not lie close to the plate, and it must then lie at least as far away as the internal surface of the calcaneus and at a depth from the sole that can be measured on the plate. Plate 151. _Shrapnel—Plate 151. LOWER EXTREMITY. The fibular side lay next to the plate, as shown by the shadow of the fibula and the calcaneo-cuboid articulation. As the metallic particles, showing the path of the missile, appear to be next to the plate, the course of the missile was from the external border of the tendo Achillis diagonally downward and forward, causing only a slight fissure of the calcaneus. A missile, to have done so little damage and to have left a metallic track showing its contact with the bone, must have been unjacketed and of low velocity, and therefore a shrapnel ball. Plate 152. _Shrapnel—Plate 152. LOWER EXTREMITY. The tibial side of the foot lay next to the photographic plate. The normal size, great density, and sharp outline of the shadow of the shrapnel ball show that it lay also close to the plate and about an inch below the inside of the body of the calcaneus. No metallic particles mark the track of the ball in this case, because the course was parallel to the inner surface of the bursa without forceful, or perhaps any, contact with the bursa, and passing through soft tissue, only. Plate 153. _Shrapnel—Plate 153. LOWER EXTREMITY. That the inner border of the foot lay next to the plate is shown by the articulation between astragalus, scaphoid, internal cuneiform, and first metatarsal. The metallic particles show the course of the ball from the posterior calcaneo-astragaloid ligament to below the anterior inferior border of the calcaneus. As the shadow of the ball is enlarged and the shadow of the fragments blurred, their position is not near the plate and their location is therefore on the external plane of the calcaneus, with the ball lying near the sole. Plate 154. _Shrapnel—Plate 154. LOWER EXTREMITY. The plate shows, in the wound of entrance, the metal particles deposited by a shrapnel ball which passed out of the sole of the foot without damage to the bone. The missile carried some small particles of lead, almost wholly detached by a ricochet before striking the foot, which were scraped off as it passed through the skin. The wound was infected, and radiography was indicated for diagnosis. Plate 155. _Shrapnel—Plate 155. LOWER EXTREMITY. The sole of the foot lay next to the plate. While the very clear, sharp outlines of the metal fragments would seem to show them very near the plate and consequently at the platen side of the tarsus, the foot is not of sufficient thickness to make a very appreciable difference between shadows of such fragments on the dorsal and on the plantar surfaces of the metatarsus. It is very probable that the ball struck the convex, rather than the concave outline of the transverse arch, as the missile has escaped with no fracture of the bones, which would have been very difficult in mechanical accomplishment if its course had been along the convex outline. There is no fracture of the bones, although a shrapnel ball has passed transversely through the foot, striking the heads of the second and third metatarsals with only slight injury and leaving a few metal particles at points of contact. Plate 156. _Shrapnel—Plate 156. LOWER EXTREMITY. The sole of the foot lay next to the plate. The normal outline of the shadow of the shrapnel ball shows it to lie near the plate or at least beneath the plantar surface of the first metatarsal. The fragments of metal lying near the fourth and fifth metatarsals lie either in the same relation or on the plantar side of the metatarsus. The metallic track leads to the wound of exit of shrapnel ball, other than the one lodged. Even though the missile has escaped, its identity can be creditably established by the one remaining, which, it is morally certain, was the escaped missile’s companion. These shrapnel particles again demonstrate that the metal deposits seen in other wounds can be identified as particles of lead scraped off from shrapnel balls in the contact of the latter with bones. Plate 157. _ |