  New York, Sept. 18th, 1849.—I have examined Mr. Foote’s method of detecting counterfeit Bank Notes, and have no hesitation in saying, that in my opinion it will be exceedingly serviceable to any who will give it their attention. F. W. EDMONDS, Cashier Mechanics’ Bank, N.Y. I concur in the above. E. H. ARTHUR, Mr. H. C. Foote’s method of detecting counterfeit and altered notes is founded on true principles, and well worthy the consideration of all money-takers. J. McCHESNEY, CHAS. COLGATE & CO., Exchange Brokers, 67 Wall street. C. S. SLOANE, Exchange Broker, 23 Wall street. ANTHONY LANE, Exchange Broker, 49 Wall street. Troy, Nov. 23d, 1849.—Two months since I attended Mr. Foote’s instructions in detecting counterfeit Bank Notes, and am very willing now to say that I am well satisfied with his system and mode of explaining it. C. P. HARTT, Teller Troy City Bank. New York, Nov. 28th, 1849.—I fully concur in the opinion respecting Mr. Foote’s mode of detecting Counterfeit Bills as expressed above. J. SIMPSON, Book-keeper, 72 William street. City Hall, New York, Nov 29th, 1849.—I fully concur with Mr. Simpson in the above opinion. GEO. W. MATSELL, Lansingburgh, N. Y., Nov. 23d, 1849.—I fully agree with the preceding opinions on the subject of H. C. Foote’s Detector. A. WALSH, Jr., Teller Bank of Lansingburgh. New York, Dec. 22d, 1849.—I concur in the above statements. AMASA Z. FOSTER, Exchange Broker, 234 Pearl street. New York, Dec. 26th, 1849.—I have examined Mr. H. C. Foote’s system for detecting counterfeit Bank paper and think it useful, especially in well-executed counterfeits where judgment must depend upon the engraving alone. W. R. VERMILYE, New York, Nov. 17th, 1849.—Having taken lessons in counterfeit Bank Note Detection, as given by Mr. H. C. Foote, I hesitate not to say that I am fully satisfied that if strictly followed and practised upon, any man may detect the most ingenious counterfeit. It has the advantage of being reduced to system, and the information imparted respecting genuine engraving is worth double the cost of lesson. A. LEWIS, New York, Nov. 20th, 1849.—I have examined into Mr. Foote’s system of counterfeit detection, and am satisfied it is useful and of great advantage to all dealing in Bank Notes. WILSON DEFENDORF, Exchange Broker, 82 Wall street. SMITH & HAWS, Exchange Brokers, 137 Chatham street. New York, Jan. 8th, 1850.—Having been instructed by Mr. H. C. Foote in his method of detecting counterfeit Bank Bills, I can say with confidence that his system is perfect. CHAS. W. HUBBELL, Cashier with Lee & Brewster, New York, Dec. 5th, 1849.—Having availed myself of the instruction imparted in counterfeit detection as taught by Mr. H. C. Foote, I have no hesitation in saying that I am fully satisfied that it can by strict attention to the rules be made an infallible means of detecting all kinds of spurious Bills. A. CARPENTER, Domestic Goods, 52 Cedar street. New York. Feb. 19th, 1850.—I take pleasure in stating that the instruction I have received from Mr. Foote is of great service to me in detecting counterfeit and altered Bills. CHAS. F. GOODHUE, Cashier at D. & D. H. Brooks, New York, Feb. 19th, 1850.—About the best three dollars I have spent was with Mr. Foote for his valuable lesson in detecting counterfeit money. JOHN T. BROWN, New York, 16th Nov. 1849.—I have examined the system of Mr. Foote for detecting counterfeits, and am satisfied that it is infallible when all the rules are applied. S. M. ALFORD, Also several hundred more testimonials from Bankers, Brokers, and Merchants in New York City, Troy, Buffalo, Detroit and Ohio. |
|
