Keller, “Lake-dwellings,” p. 326. Desor, “Les Palafittes,” p. 30.

Arch. Journ., vol. xxii. p. 253. “Brit. Barrows,” pp. 32, 376.

Arch. f. Anthr., vol. xviii. (1889), p. 235. See also Zeitsch. f. Ethn., vol. xxviii. (1896) p. 473.

Proc. S. A. Scot., vol. ix. p. 548.

“The Past in the Present,” (1880), p. 1.

Arch. Journ., vol. xxvi. p. 184.

Ib. xxvi. p. 184.

Wilde, “Cat. Mus. R. I. A.,” p. 116.

Proc. S. A. Scot., vol. iv. pp. 72, 119–286.

Proc. S. A. S., vol. iv. p. 259.

Proc. S. A. S., vol. xv. pp. 149, 156.

Proc. S. A. S., vol. v. p. 313.

A. J., vol. xxiv. p. 250; xxvii. p. 160. For others from Anglesea see Arch. Camb., 5th S., vol. ix. p. 242.

Reliquary, vol. vi. pp. 207, 211.

Arch. Journ., vol. xxvi. p. 304.

Arch. Camb., 3rd S., vol. iii. p. 305.

A. J., vol. viii. p. 427. Arch. Camb., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 223; 3rd S., vi. p. 376.

Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iv. p. 170. Journ. R. I. Corn., vol. ii. p. 280.

Proc. S. A. Scot., vol. iv. p. 54; v. pp. 15, 82; vi. p. 208. A. J., vol. x. p. 219.

“Brit. Barrows,” pp. 116, 196.

Arch. Journ., vol. ix. p. 11; xxiv. p. 250.

“Stone Age,” p. 81.

Proc. S. A. S., vol. xxiii. p. 213.

C. R. Smith’s “Cat. Lond. Ant.,” p. 70. Lee’s “Isca Silurum,” p. 47.

Rabut, “Hab. Lac. de la Sav.,” 2me MÉm., pl. vii. 1.

1863, p. 151.

“Alt. u. h. V.,” vol. i. Heft ii. Taf. 1, fig. 1.

Schoolcraft, “Ind. Tribes,” vol. i. p. 83.

Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. i. p. 268. Arch. Journ., vol. x. p. 219.

Proc. S. A. S., vol. xv. p. 108.

Proc. S. A. S., vol. xxiii. p. 217.

Arch., vol. xxxiv. p. 135.

Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. iii. p. 125.

Proc. S. A. S., vol. xxiii. p. 216.

Proc. S. A. S., vol. xi. p. 351. Sir A. Mitchell, “The Past in the Present,” p. 239 et seqq.

Im Thurn, “Among the Indians of Guiana,” 1883, p. 427.

Proc. S. A. S., vol. x. p. 717.

Arch., vol. xlvi. p. 430, pl. xxiv. 21.

“Cat. Mus. R. I. A.,” p. 45.

Camd. Soc. Ed., p. 458.

A polished flint is still used for producing a brilliant surface on some kinds of coloured papers which are known as “flint-glazed.” See “Flint Chips,” p. 101.

Lilly’s “Euphues and his England,” ed. 1617.

2nd ed., p. 468.

“Vulg. Errors,” ii. c. 4.

Proc. S. A. S., vol. xiv. p. 64.

Proc. S. A. S., vol. xv. p. 192.

Trans. Lanc. and Chesh. Arch. Soc., vol. iii. p. 256.

Arch. Journ., vol. xxvi., p. 321.

Arch. Assoc. Journ., vol. xii. p. 177.

Arch. Assoc. Journ., vol. xvii. p. 20, pl. v. 1.

Arch. Camb., 4th S., vol. xiii. p. 224.

Arch., vol. xxxvi. p. 456.

“South Wilts,” p. 124.

“Vest. Ant. Derb.,” p. 29.

Arch., vol. xii. p. 327.

“Ancient Meols,” p. 314.

“Ind. Tribes,” vol. ii. pl. 50.

Mitchell’s “Past in the Present,” pp. 122, 128–132. Proc. S. A. S., vol. xii. p. 268.

Proc. S. A. S., vol. xiii. p. 279.

“Lake-dwellings,” p. 331.

Proc. S. A. S., vol. ix. pp. 154, 174, 557.

Arch., vol. xlvi. pp. 468, 493.

Vol. i. p. 117. Wilson’s “Preh. Ann. of Scot.,” vol. i. p. 207.

Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 266.

Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. v. pp. 30, 83.

P. S. A. S., vol. vi. p. 89.

“Cat. Arch. Inst. Mus. Ed.,” p. 20.

Proc. S. A. S., vol. xxii. p. 111.

P. S. A. S., vol. i. p. 138.

“Cat. A. I. Mus. Ed.,” p. 18. P. S. A. S., vol. i. p. 267.

Arch. Journ., vol. xxvi. p. 186.

Arch. Scot., vol. iii. app. 50.

Arch. Scot., vol. iii. app. 89.

P. S. A. S., vol. ii. pp. 64, 71.

P. S. A. S., vol. vii. p. 320.

Ibid., vol. v. p. 82.

Ibid.

Ibid., vol. vi. p. 12.

Ibid., vol. i. p. 180.

Arch. Journ., vol. xiii. p. 104. “Cat. A. I. Mus. Ed.,” p. 47. P. S. A. S., vol. ii. p. 330. Arch. Camb., 3rd S., vol. xi. p. 429.

Wilde, “Cat. Mus. R. I. A.,” p. 114.

P. S. A. S., vol. i. p. 118. “Preh. Ann. of Scot.,” vol. i. p. 208.

Arch. Journ., vol. xiii. p. 104.

Engraved in Arch. Journ., vol. xvi. p. 299.

Arch. Journ., vol. xxv. p. 290. Trans. Preh. Cong., 1868, p. 363. Trans. Devon. Assoc., vol. ii. p. 619; xii. p. 124.

See Pengelly in Tr. Dev. Assoc., vol. iv. p. 105.

Trans. Devon. Assoc., vol. iv. p. 302, pl. iv. 2.

The pole-lathe is also still in use in the manufacture of metallic cocks in which the revolution of the barrel being turned has to be stopped before the complete circle has been gone through.—See Timmins’s “Birmingham and Mid. Hardware District,” (1866), p. 291.

Hutchins’ “Dorset,” vol. i. p. 38. Gough’s “Camden’s Brit.,” vol. i. p. 70, pl. ii. Warne’s “Celtic Tumuli,” § 3, p. 4.

Warne, l. c.

“Exc. on Cranborne Chase,” vol. i. pl. xlviii.

Arch. Journ., vol. xxiii. p. 35.

Arch. Journ., vol. xxiv. p. 189, whence the cut is borrowed.

Erroneously called a celt by Mr. Kirwan.

Arch. Journ., vol. xiii. p. 183; xv. 90. Sussex Arch. Coll., vol. ix. p. 120.

“Der Bernstein-schmuck der Steinzeit,” KÖnigsberg in Pr., 1882.

Mem. Anthrop. Soc. Lond., vol. i. p. 296, pl. i. Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 51.

“Stone Age,” pl. x. 210.

Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. viii. p. 213.

Arch. Journ., vol. xxvii. p. 160, pl. ii. 2.

Arch. Camb., 5th S., vol. viii. p. 56.

Vol. xxvi. p. 288.

Journ. Eth. Soc., vol. ii. p. 430.

P. S. A. S., vol. vii. p. 478.

P. S. A. S., vol. vii. p. 502, fig. vii.; viii. p. 232; xxix. p. 6.

Proc. S. A. S., vol. xi. pp. 82, 83.

Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. ii. pp. 4, 59; vol. x. p. 539.

Proc. S. A. S., vol. x. p. 539.

P. S. A. S., vol. ii. p. 191.

Proc. S. A. S., vol. x. p. 538.

Ibid., vol. i. p. 149.

Proc. S. A. S., vol. x. p. 548.

P. S. A. S., vol. xii. p. 263.

Wilson’s “Preh. Ann. of Scot.,” vol. i. p. 206. Hibbert’s “Shetland,” p. 412. “Cat. Mus. Soc. Ant. L.,” p. 18.

“Ten Years’ Dig.,” p. 173.