Punctuation and spelling were made consistent when a predominant preference was found in this book; otherwise they were not changed. Misspellings in quoted evidence not changed; misspellings that could be due to mispronunciations were not changed. Some simple typographical errors were corrected. Inconsistent hyphenation of compound words retained. Ambiguous end-of-line hyphens retained. Occasional uses of "Mr." for "Mrs." and of "Mrs." for "Mr." corrected. Dubious repeated words, (e.g., "What took place by way of of conversation?") retained. Several unbalanced quotation marks not remedied. Occasional periods that should be question marks not changed. Occasional periods that should be commas, and commas that should be periods, were changed only when they clearly had been misprinted (at the end of a paragraph or following a speaker's name in small-caps at the beginning of a line). Some commas and semi-colons were printed so faintly that they appear to be periods or colons: some were found and corrected, but some almost certainly remain. Page 4: "Where is their main office?" was misprinted as "there"; corrected here. Page 4: "No. I also visited my brother, in Yellow Springs, Ohio." was misprinted as "visited by"; corrected here. Page 14: the name "James P. Hasty" should be "James P. Hosty"; not changed here. Page 15: Misspelling in "It was unfortun that" not changed. Page 15: Misspellings in "the stuip Cuban consule was at fault" not changed. Page 16: Misspelling in "was a rather lengthly one?" not changed. Page 25: "otherway" not changed. Page 27: "Did she evidence any" was misprinted as "he"; corrected here. Page 54: Possible missing word in "of the Randle home looking West Fifth Street?" Page 95: "(Commission Exhibits Nos. 451 and 453 through 456 were received in evidence.)" "456" was misprinted as "465" but printed correctly two lines earlier; corrected here. Page 136: "and improved my ability to converse" misprinted as "by ability"; corrected here. Page 157: "Mr. Berlin. Well, sir, it is on one of your interviews here." was misprinted as "Mr. Brennan."; corrected here. Page 166: "were certain books—if you" probably should be "where"; not changed. Page 186: "In other words, there is a little difference in your memory there on this." was printed as part of a statement by Mr. Brennan, but may have been said by someone else. Page 208: "Mr. Jarman. After the third shot was fired I would say it was about a minute." was printed as "Mr. Ball"; corrected here. Page 361: The measurement in "This was a 5- by 71-cm defect" probably was misprinted; not changed here. Page 373: "whether it was an entrance wound or an exit wound," should end with a question mark instead of a comma. Page 409: "so what when the shot was fired" probably should be "so that when". Page 414: "Would that trend to improve the shooter's marksmanship?" probably should be "tend". Page 428: "This the cartridge case from the building, Exhibit 545." probably should be "This is the". Page 477: "And then it was returned November 17, 1963." Incorrect date, should be no earlier than November 23, 1963. Page 481: "So in you opinion" should be "your". Page 481: "Mr. Cunningham. Yes, sir; well—these would be very difficult—in other" is an incomplete sentence. Page 481: "A small sample was taken off the noise" probably should be "nose". Page 487: "the cast of both hand" was printed that way. |