If one were to point out the most distinctive feature of the educational system in the Fatherland to-day, it would perhaps be the highly specialized condition of the technical schools.

In approaching our problem we naturally ask ourselves the question as to how far the industrial progress of a country is influenced by technical education. In no time as in our own has so much stress been laid upon the commercial side of our existence. New trades, new industries are springing up; specialization is becoming more far-reaching and more firmly established than ever before; competition is becoming keener; the application of science to the arts is more varied.

In this latter field we find Germany in the very fore front, she having developed along these lines to a greater extent than have many of our nations. Illustrations of this application lie all about us,—in the bettered transportation facilities by railroad and by ocean vessel; in the more improved bridge and building construction; in the methods of water supply and drainage; in modes of heat, light, and ventilation; in electric vehicles, sound transmitters, labor-saving machinery; in finely adjusted instruments that bring far away worlds almost within reaching distance; in these and a thousand other ways is made manifest the result of the application of science to the arts. Germany is taking a prominent part in this warfare for industrial supremacy, and that she expects her technical schools to be largely instrumental in answering many of the problems of the present and the future cannot be doubted, especially when one is made aware of the diversity and extent of the schools of a technical character scattered over the Empire.

It will be readily understood from the foregoing how difficult a matter it is to make any one classification that will cover in an adequate manner the various types of existing institutions. Frequently a school is found which in some respects is distinctive. To place such a school in this or that category would of course do violence to the classification, while to form a new class only serves to further complicate and bewilder. Again, various of the institutions mentioned may offer such a differentiated schedule or be made up of so many parallel departments as to entitle them to admission into two or more of the classes given.

Another point of difficulty lies in the fact that the term “technical” would in Germany be somewhat more sweeping than with us in America. We do not class technical training with so-called manual training or handwork of the elementary schools. In our present study however, we shall find that while in the main we are dealing with the technical training of boys from fourteen to eighteen years of age,—comparable in a measure to our high or secondary school courses, we shall also include the industrial, vocational, or trade training of men and boys alike, as well as work in the more simplified forms of handicraft, as carried on in the lower or elementary school. Reference will also be made to the instruction of a higher order,—such for example as makes for engineers. These facts will be illuminated as the study proceeds.

In reading into these schools their real significance, several points must be kept constantly in mind. At an early age the German youth is supposed to have solved the problem of his likes and dislikes, his abilities and shortcomings; to have gained such a perspective of his probable chances for future success, as to choose the line of work or occupation he shall follow. It is only fair to state, however, that circumstances have much to do with such decision, viz,—the occupation of the father, the financial outlook of the family, the industrial demands of the locality, the particular educational opportunities offered,—these and like problems entering in as vital elements.

Then too, the founding and sustaining of a technical school is a matter to be noted. This may be in the hands of the general government, of the state, of the municipality, or may be looked after by private enterprise. The Guilds, Vereins or Associations may organize, equip and foster schools of such character as train directly for their particular lines of work. It must be stated however in this connection, that there seems to be a strong tendency at the present time toward the centralizing of control in the states. This has been brought about in large measure through the ever-increasing willingness on the part of the state to give financial backing to the schools, and thus has quite naturally arisen the desire and necessity on the part of the state, that it have a controlling voice in the school administration. Herein lies one of the main differences between such education in Germany and that of our own country.

Conrad’s HandwÖrterbuch der Staatswissenschaften, 1900, in an article entitled “Gewerblicher Unterricht”, gives the following table on state expenditure for trade and technical instruction in recent years:

Prussia:

• Marks 142,000 ($33,796) in 1874;
• Marks 475,000 ($114,050) in 1885;
• Marks 4,672,000 ($1,111,936) in 1899.

Saxony:

• Marks 235,000 ($60,214) in 1873;
• Marks 570,000 ($135,660) in 1885;
• Marks 1,138,000 ($270,844) in 1898.

Wurttemburg industrial continuation school:

• Marks, 58,000 ($13,804) in 1869;
• Marks 129,000 ($30,702) in 1879;
• Marks 164,000 ($39,032) in 1889;
• Marks 208,000 ($49,504) in 1897.

The cost of the state per capita of the population of the expenditures was as follows:

• Prussia, Pfennigs 15 (3½ cts.) in 1899;
• Saxony, Pfennigs 29 (7 cts.) in 1898;
• Hesse, Pfennigs 22 (5 cts.) in 1898.

The cost per Marks 1,000 ($236) of the entire state expenditures was Marks 2.27 (54 cts.) in Prussia in 1899, and Marks 5.88 ($1.40) in Saxony in 1898.

In general the German schools are classified upon a basis of the grade of instruction given rather than upon the character of the subjects taught. Primary education is compulsory, that is to say, all children are compelled by law to attend school from their sixth to their fourteenth year. It is at this point that we find our difficulty. To quote Dr. Alwin Pabst of Leipzig (who speaks of conditions governing technical schools):

“The age of admission, length of course, fees and other conditions (examinations) of these schools differ widely. Ages range from fourteen to thirty years or over; length of course, one to four or five years; fees perhaps twenty to thirty marks per year. The Fortbildungsschule is the only institution in which no fee is charged.” (Taken from a personal letter.)

Several classifications commend themselves for use. Each has its weaknesses and breaks down at some point, owing to the conditions previously mentioned. In order the better to illustrate this difficulty I shall give these various possible classifications.

The first refers chiefly to the scheme of secondary education and was the one first chosen and later discarded. It was suggested mainly by Sir Philip Magnus’s work on “Industrial Education” and the “Report of the Industrial Commission”, Vol. 1.

• 1. Industrieschulen
  • Gewerbeschulen
• 2. Trade Schools
  • Fachschulen
• 3. Building Trade Schools
• 4. Secondary Technical Schools
  • Higher Technical
  • Foremen
  • Building
  • Weaving
  • Drawing
• 5. Industrial Art Schools (Kunstgewerbe)
  • Pure Art
  • Applied Art
• 6. Polytechnics or Technische Hochschulen
• 7. Continuation Schools—Fortbildungsschulen

Another classification, suggested in most part by a German authority is as follows:

• 1. Fortbildungsschulen—Continuation schools
• 2. Industrie—or Fachschulen—Special Trade Schools
• 3. Gewerbeschulen
• 4. Technische Schulen
• 5. Technische Hochschulen
• 6. Baugewerkschulen—School for Architects
• 7. Kunstgewerbeschulen—Schools of Art

In the Seventeenth Annual Report of the U.S. Commissioner of Labor for 1902 we find the following:

• 1. Technical Colleges
• 2. Secondary or Intermediate Technical Schools
• 3. Schools and Museums of Industrial Art
• 4. Schools for Foremen
• 5. Schools for the Textile Trades
• 6. Trade and Industrial Continuation Schools
• 7. Industrial Drawing Courses
• 8. Other Institutions for Industrial Education.

The order followed in the present study is finally given below. It is one not to be found elsewhere, but more closely resembles that of Dr. Pabst (the second classification) and that found in the Seventeenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor. It has undoubtedly its weak points, but I feel it is the best that can be made however, as it is based upon data recently published, and the results of correspondence with German school authorities, in addition to a not very extended knowledge gained through personal contact with the German schools. It may be taken therefore, as bringing the work down to the present time:

• 1. Continuation Schools or Fortbildungsschulen
• 2. Trade Schools or Fachschulen
• 3. Secondary or Intermediate Technical Schools or Gewerbliche Mittelschulen
• 4. Technical Colleges or Technische Hochschulen
• 5. School and Museums of Industrial Art, or Kunstgewerbeschulen