INDEX

Previous
ss="pginternal">69, 75, 112-3, 119, 129, 215-6, 237;
  • necessitous, report on home circumstances of, 138-9;
  • physique of, at Liverpool, 171-2;
  • industrial employment of, 172, 192;
  • effect of meals on, physically, xiii, 3-4n, 5-6, 7-8, 29n, 30, 82, 157, 184-197, 201, 224, 246-7;
  • mentally, 7-8, 31, 188, 197-9, 201;
  • in point of manners, 22, 23n, 199, 201, 253;
  • in matter of taste, 97, 199-201;
  • morally, 76, 202.
  • See also Attendance, Day Industrial Schools, Infants, Malnutrition, Meals, Selection, Special Schools
  • Children Act (1908), 112, 118n
  • Children's Aid Association, 53, 58, 66, 96.
  • Children's Care (Central) Sub-Committee, 137n, 140, 144
  • Children's Care Committees, in provinces, 65-6;
  • Education (Administrative Provisions) Act (1907), 203
  • Education (Administrative Provisions) Bills, 54, 105n
  • Education (Provision of Meals) Act, xii, xiv, xvi, 3, 61, 109, 110, 112, 200, 237, 238;
    • debates on, 44-7;
    • provisions of, 47-9;
    • adoption of, xiv, 50, 51-8;
    • should be compulsory, xv, 127
  • Education (Provision of Meals) Act Amendment Bills, 101n, 105n
  • Education (Scotland) Act (1908), 48, 127, 237-8
  • Eichholz, Dr., xiii, 29, 30, 134
  • Elementary Education Act (1876), 15n, 118n
  • Elementary Education (Defective and Epileptic Children) Act (1899), 57n
  • Elementary Education (Feeding of Children) Bill (1905), 39n
  • Enquiry, 65-8, 242;
  • Erith, 64
  • Fabian Society, 25, 52
  • Farnell, 246
  • Farquharson, Dr. Robert, 9n
  • Feeble-minded Children. See Special Schools
  • s@57313@57313-h@57313-h-15.htm.html#Page_224" class="pginternal">224, 228, 229;
  • provision of, for all necessitous children, 220, 222, 223, 228;
  • general provision of, without enquiry, 25, 126-7, 223-8, 229, 251, 258, 259-61, 264, 265, 266-7.
  • See also Centres, Children, Cookery Centres, Dietary, Holidays, Local Education Authorities, Parents, Payment, Poor Law Guardians, Rates, Restaurants, School, Supervision, Voluntary Agencies, Wages
  • Medical Inspection, 10, 24, 54, 208, 221;
    • in Brussels, 264;
    • and Feeding, Inter-Departmental Committee on, 34-8, 44, 109n, 126n, 134n
  • Medical Officer of Health, 81
  • Medical Treatment, 65n, 139, 145, 203, 208, 227
  • Mental Capacity, relation of, to nutrition, 31, 179-83, 198
  • Mentally Defective. See Special Schools
  • Meyer, Lady, 201
  • Middlesex, 174-5
  • Milan, 259
  • Milk, provision of, 97, 144, 155, 159;
    • effects of, 191-2
  • Monitors, 92, 94, 101, 121, 128, 161-2, 116-7, 129, 165, 166;
  • the authority for the provision of meals, xvi, 33n, 39n, 45, 46, 47n, 141;
  • service of meals by, 43;
  • no co-operation between Voluntary Agencies and, 14, 17;
  • prosecution by, 14-5, 43;
  • overlapping of, with Education Authorities, 51, 113-7, 129-30, 139, 163-6;
  • representation of, on Canteen Committees, 58, 114n;
  • payment for school meals by, 108n, 115-6, 130, 164, 165;
  • payment for children in Day Industrial Schools by, 118n;
  • provision of meals by, at Manchester, 14n.
  • See also Parish Council, Poor Rate, and Relief (School Children) Order
  • Poor Laws, Royal Commission on (1909), 113, 119, 197n
  • Poor Rate, provision of meals from, 32, 39.
  • Poplar, 164
  • Porridge, 78, 200, 201;
  • Portsmouth, 60n, 81, 83, 98, 103
  • Potteries, 195
  • Poverty Test. See Selection
  • Prevention of Cruelty to Children Act, 237
  • Prices, changes in, 20-1
  • Ragged School Union, 5
  • Ragged Schools, 2, 3, 4
  • Rates, expenditure on provision of meals from, 3, 28, 31, 34, 48, 54-5, 3, 13, 24-5, 31, 36, 47, 51-2, 58, 238, 239-40, 245-6, 250-1, 255-7, 258-9, 262-4, 265-6, 267-8, 269;
  • co-operation of, with Guardians, 14, 17, 40
  • Voluntary Contributions, amount of, 54-5, 137, 141-2, 251;
    • provision of meals during holidays from, 103, 104, 141-2
  • Voluntary Workers, utilisation of services of, 65-6, 144, 263;
  • Wages, effect of provision of meals on, 45, 212-4;
  • Wandsworth, 41n
  • Ward, Mrs. Humphry, 190-1n
  • Waugh, Mr. Benjamin, 14
  • West Derby, 116
  • West Ham, 58n, 64, 69, 72, 77n, 78, 83, 94-5, 102, 104, 110-11, 116-7, 234
  • Whitechapel, 142, 154
  • Winder, Miss Phyllis D., 71-2
  • Wilson, Mr. W. T., 44n
  • Wolverhampton, 175, 1."Many of our own [Roman Catholic] schools ... fed the children even in the 'sixties." (Report of Select Committee on Education (Provision of Meals) Bills (England and Scotland), 1906, Evidence of Monsignor Brown, Q. 1038.)

  • 2.It is interesting to note that the impulse for the formation of this society came indirectly from France. In 1848 a commission of medical and scientific men had been appointed by the French Government to enquire into the causes of diseases, such as scrofula, rickets, and impoverishment of blood, to which children of the poor were exposed, and which produced so much mortality. The Committee reported that in their opinion the diseases were caused by children not having animal food, and might be checked by their having a meal of fresh meat once a month. Owing to political events no action was taken on this report, but it made a great impression on Victor Hugo, and some fourteen years later (in 1862) he started the experiment of giving dinners of fresh meat and a small glass of wine, once a fortnight, to forty of the most necessitous young children of Guernsey. This experiment was declared to be very successful. Many children suffering from the above diseases had been cured, "and the physical constitution of nearly the whole of them sensibly improved" (Punch, January 16, 1864). This description concluded with a suggestion that a similar scheme might be initiated in London. The Destitute Children's Dinner Society was the result. (Charity Organisation Review, January, 1885, p. 23.)

    3.Report on Metropolitan Soup Kitchens and Dinner Tables, by the Society for Organising Charitable Relief, 1871, p. 57.

    4.The Times, December 5, 1867.

    5.Ibid., November 1, 1870. The following year the Charity Organisation Society reports approvingly that the Destitute Children's Dinner Society "cordially accepts and endeavours to act up to the principle that 'to relieve destitution belongs to the Poor Law, while to prevent destitution is the peculiar function of charity.'" (Report on Metropolitan Soup Kitchens and Dinner Tables, 1871, p. 57.)

    6.The cost of a meal was generally 4d., 5d. or 6d.

    7.The Times, April 15, 1868.

    8.We have only found one case where the dinner was given as often as three times a week. (See letter from John Palmer, Hon. Sec. of the Clare Market Ragged Schools, ibid., October 16, 1871.)

    9.Thus a dinner given by the Refuge for Homeless and Destitute Children to pupils of St. Giles and St. George, Bloomsbury, consisted of boiled and roast beef, plenty of potatoes, and a thick slice of bread, the portion given to each child being abundant. (Ibid., November 27, 1869.)

    10.Ibid., December 5, 1867.

    11.Ibid., March 26, 1869.

    12.Report of Ragged School Union for 1870, quoted in Report on Metropolitan Soup Kitchens and Dinner Tables, 1871, p. 58.

    13.Letter from the Treasurer of the Destitute Children's Dinner Society, The Times, April 15, 1868.

    14.In that year (1868) dinners were given during nine months, being discontinued only from July to September, but in subsequent years they appear to have been provided during the winter months only.

    15."At the present season, when the energy of the School Board visitors is filling the schools with all the poorest of the poor street Arabs, the need of such a society as this is more than ever felt." (Letter from the Committee of the Destitute Children's Dinner Society, The Times, December 12, 1872.)

    16.London School Board, Report of Special Committee on Underfed Children, 1895, Appendix 1, p. 5.

    17.Report of Inter-Departmental Committee on Medical Inspection and Feeding, 1905, Vol. II., Q. 304.

    18.London School Board, Report of Special Committee on Underfed Children, 1895, Appendix 1, p. 6.

    19.Mr. Mundella in the House of Commons, Hansard, July 26, 1883, 3rd Series, Vol. 282, pp. 577-9. "The effect on the health of the children," writes the Rector of Rousdon in January, 1885, "may be well exemplified by the most recent illustration—viz., that in the third week of December, though whooping-cough had been, and still was, prevalent among them, and the weather was damp and raw, the entry on the master's weekly report was, absentees, 0—that is, every child on the register had appeared on the Monday morning and paid for its week's dinners. Probably such a circumstance in a rural school district (with radius of a mile and a half at least) in the height of winter is unprecedented." (Sanitary Record, January 15, 1885.)

    20.The Times, April 15, 1880. Speaking of the children at London Hospitals, Dr. Robert Farquharson writes: "Ill-fed and badly housed and clothed, exposed to depressing sanitary and domestic conditions, these poor creatures are frequently expected to do an amount of school work of which their badly-nourished brains are utterly incapable. I have long been familiar with the pale, dejected look, the chronic headache, the sleeplessness, the loss of appetite, the general want of tone, caused undoubtedly by the undue exercise of nervous tissues unprovided with their proper allowance of healthy food." Such children "are by no means inclined to shirk their lessons; they are frequently much interested in them; but, feeling the responsibility of class and examinations keenly ... they become sleepless and restless, and rapidly lose flesh and strength." (Ibid., April 19, 1880.)

    21."That good feeding is necessary for brain nutrition does not need to be demonstrated or even argued at length ... it must be evident that the position in which education places the brains of underfed children is that of a highly-exercised organ urgently requiring food, and finding none or very little. These children are growing, and all or nearly all the food they can get is appropriated by the grosser and bulkier parts of the body to the starvation of the brain.... It is cruel to educate a growing child unless you are also prepared to feed him." (Leading Article, The Lancet, August 4, 1883, Vol. II., pp. 191-2.)

    22.Hansard, July 26, 1883, 3rd Series, Vol. 282, p. 597.

    23.Ibid., p. 598.

    24.The Times, September 16, 1884.

    25.School Board Chronicle, December 13, 1884, pp. 628-9.

    26."It is now admitted that children cannot be expected to learn their lessons unless they are properly fed." (The Times, Leading Article, December 13, 1884.)

    27.Ibid.

    28.Charity Organisation Review, January, 1885, p. 25. As we shall see (post, p. 19), their fears in this respect were realised.

    29.The Times, Leading Article, January 20, 1885.

    30.The School Board Chronicle, December 13, 1884, p. 627.

    31.Such voluntary agencies were established, for instance, at Hastings (about 1882), at Birmingham and Gateshead (in 1884), at Carlisle (in 1889).

    32.School Board Chronicle, December 13, 1884, pp. 629-630.

    33.Ibid., p. 628.

    34.The Times, December 16, 1885.

    35.Thus at Liverpool, about 1885, the Council of Education resolved to offer grants to School Managers for the supply of needful appliances for penny dinners, provided that "the payment of a penny should absolutely cover the cost of each dinner, so as not only to avoid pauperising the recipient, but also to render the scheme entirely self-supporting." (Report of Special Sub-Committee on Meals for School Children, in Minutes of London School Board, July 25, 1889, p. 383.) At Birmingham the School Board allowed a voluntary committee to erect kitchens on the school premises. (London School Board, Report of General Purposes Committee on Underfed Children attending School, 1899, p. 253.) At Gateshead, in 1884, the School Board arranged for a supply of dinners in the schools in the poorest parts of the town. (Report of Select Committee on the Education (Provision of Meals) Bills (England and Scotland), 1906, Q. 4101.) In London, the School Board in 1885 resolved "that the Board grant facilities to local managers and to other responsible persons for the provision on the school premises of penny dinners on self-supporting principles for elementary school children, where it can be done without interference with school work or injury to the school buildings." (Report of Special Committee on Meals for School Children, in Minutes of London School Board, July 25, 1889, p. 374.) At Manchester, as early as 1879, the School Board initiated a scheme for providing meals. The chairman, Mr. Herbert Birley, had been in the habit of supplying breakfasts to poor children in some of the schools, and on these schools being transferred to the School Board, he induced it to continue the work. (Report of Inter-Departmental Committee on Medical Inspection and Feeding, 1905, Vol. II., Qs. 2745A, 2754, evidence of Mr. C. H. Wyatt.)

    36.In Manchester there had been a serious attempt to meet the difficulty. There the Board of Guardians maintained a "Day Feeding School" and gave three meals a day to its out-door relief children for some years between 1856 and 1866. (Report of Royal Commission on the Poor Laws, 1909, 8vo Edition, Vol. III., p. 148 n.)

    37.See for instance the evidence given before the London School Board in 1895. (See post, p. 17.)

    38.31 and 32 Vict. c. 122, sec. 37.

    39.House of Lords Select Committee on Poor Law Relief, 1888, Qs. 5857, 5858.

    40.By an Act of 1876, the Local Education Authority might establish Day Industrial Schools at which one or more meals were provided, towards the cost of which the parents should contribute. (39 and 40 Vict., c. 79, sec. 16.) Very few such schools were established. (See post, p. 119.)

    41.The Committee represented the Self-Supporting Penny Dinner Council, the Board School Children's Free Dinner Fund, the South London Schools Dinner Fund, Free Breakfasts and Dinners for the Poor Board School and other Children of Southwark (the Referee Fund) and the Poor Children's Aid Association.

    42.The Times, November 16, 1887.

    43.Report of Special Sub-Committee on Meals for School Children, in Minutes of London School Board, July 25, 1889, p. 373.

    44.Ibid.

    45.Ibid., p. 372.

    46.Ibid., p. 377.

    47.Seven members of the School Board were placed on the Executive Committee as a kind of informal representation, but in 1899 this number had dwindled to three. (London School Board, Report of General Purposes Committee on Underfed Children, 1899, pp. v.-vi.) There was "no direct touch" between the two bodies, "except the accidental circumstance that Members of the Board might be on the Committee" of the Association. (Ibid., p. 6, evidence of Mr. T. A. Spalding.)

    48.London School Board, Report of Special Committee on Underfed Children, 1895, p. vii.

    49.Ibid.

    50.Ibid., p. 11, evidence of Mr. W. H. Libby. "I am of opinion," said this witness, "that the children of parents who are in receipt of out-door relief are more in need of our help than others." (Ibid.) "In my experience," said Mrs. Burgwin, "the greatest distress was amongst the children of parents who were in receipt of out-door relief, and free meals should certainly be given to them, for the amount allowed as out-door relief is so small that a family is left practically on the verge of starvation." (Ibid., p. 7.)

    51.Ibid., p. ii.

    52.Ibid., p. 24.

    53.Ibid., p. 30 (evidence of Mrs. Marion Leon, Manager of Vere Street School, Clare Market).

    54.Ibid., pp. 14-15 (evidence of Mr. J. Morgan).

    55.Ibid., p. 21 (evidence of Mr. C. H. Heller, Headmaster of Sayer Street School, Walworth).

    56.Ibid., p. 30 (evidence of Mrs. Marion Leon).

    57.Ibid., p. 41 (evidence of Miss L. P. Fowler).

    58.Ibid., p. iii. Even when the dinners were paid for, the payment rarely covered the cost. The same want of success was reported in the provinces. At Birmingham the experiment of giving penny dinners failed completely, and the meals had to be given free. (Report of Inter-Departmental Committee on Physical Deterioration, 1904, Qs. 13238, 13240, evidence of Dr. Airy.) "The experience of all workers in this movement testifies," says Canon Moore Ede, "that the poorest of all—those who are least well nourished—are scarcely touched by the penny dinners." ("Cheap Meals for Poor School Children," by Rev. W. Moore Ede, in Report of Conference on Education under Healthy Conditions at Manchester, 1885, p. 81.)

    59.London School Board, Report of Special Committee on Underfed Children, 1895, pp. iv., v. "Under the penny dinner system, we had to provide something to attract the children, as they would not come to the same meal every day and pay a penny for it; puddings and meat pies were provided and varied from day to day. Now they get soup." (Ibid., Appendix I., p. 39, evidence of Rev. R. Leach.) "The soup ... supplied by the National Food Association varies so very little from day to day that it is natural for the children to grow tired of it," (Ibid., p. 22, evidence of Mr. C. H. Heller.)

    60.Ibid., pp. v., viii.

    61.Ibid., p. vi.

    62.Economic Enquiries and Studies, by Sir Robert Giffen, 1904, Vol. I., pp. 398-9.

    63.Ibid., p. 419.

    64.Ibid., p. 408.

    65.A Philosophy of Social Progress, by E. J. Urwick, 1912, pp. 88, 89.

    66.London School Board, Report of General Purposes Committee on Underfed Children, 1899, p. ii., par. 1.

    67.Ibid., p. vi., par. 29.

    68.Ibid., p. iii., pars. 11, 12.

    69.Ibid., p. v., par. 25. "School dinners well managed may be made to have an admirable educative effect.... This makes me think that a proper part of the business of the School should be a common mid-day meal." (Evidence of Mrs. Despard, ibid., p. 3.) Mrs. Burgwin was of the same opinion. (Ibid., p. 14.)

    70.See, for instance, the suggestions made by Mr. Whiteley (ibid., p. ix.), and the evidence of Mrs. Burgwin and Mr. J. Morant (ibid., pp. 14, 15).

    71.Ibid., p. iv., par. 20.

    72.Ibid., p. iv., par. 17.

    73.Ibid., p. iv., par. 19.

    74.Ibid., p. v., par. 21.

    75.For some account of the "Cantines Scolaires" of Paris, and the provision of meals in other foreign towns, see Appendix III.

    76.London School Board, Report of General Purposes Committee on Underfed Children, 1899, p. vii., par. 35.

    77.Ibid., p. i.

    78.Ibid., p. xii. Minutes of the London School Board, November 30, 1899, Vol. 51, pp. 1868-72. The Majority Report was rejected by 27 votes to 12.

    79.The Times, December 1, 1899.

    80.Justice, March 29, September 13 and 27, December 6, 1884.

    81.See, for instance, the memorials presented in 1892, 1896, and 1899. (Minutes of the London School Board, November 17, 1892; February 20, 1896; December 7, 1899.)

    82.Similar committees had been in existence in several schools for some years.

    83.Minutes of the London School Board, March 1, 1900, Vol. 52, pp. 854-5, 905.

    84.See Chapter III.

    85.Report of Royal Commission on Physical Training (Scotland), 1903. Vol. I., p. 30, par. 162. "If we are going to develop the physical training of children we must be on our guard against overworking them," said one witness, "and, of course, underfed children would be positively injured by even light exercises." (Ibid., Vol. II., Q. 760, evidence of Mr. J. E. Legge, Inspector of Reformatory and Industrial Schools.) "Children can exist, when doing no mental or physical work, on a bare subsistence diet," said Dr. Clement Dukes, "but ... a bare subsistence diet becomes a starvation diet when mental or bodily work is added." (Ibid., Q. 8140.)

    86.Ibid., Vol. I., p. 30, par. 165.

    87.Ibid., p. 30, par. 167.

    88.Ibid., p. 31, par. 172.

    89.Ibid., p. 30, par. 168.

    90.Report of Inter-Departmental Committee on Physical Deterioration, 1904, p. 66, pars. 332-334; evidence of Dr. Eichholz, Qs. 471-476.

    91.Ibid., p. 67, par. 335; evidence of Dr. Eichholz, Q. 476.

    92.Ibid., Q. 9974. "The critical age," he considered, was "from 10 to 15." Looking at the enormous improvement in children in the Navy and in Industrial Schools, where they were properly fed, he did not "share the pessimistic view that the mischief is hopelessly done by the time a child reaches school age." He felt certain that "the provision of meals would do a great deal to improve the health and growth and development of the children of the poorer classes." (Ibid., Qs. 9973, 10047-8, 10051, 10006.)

    93.Ibid., Q. 3992.

    94.Ibid., Q. 452.

    95.Ibid., Q. 475.

    96.Ibid., Q. 6484. See also evidence of General Sir T. Maurice, Q. 278.

    97.Ibid., evidence of Dr. Eichholz, Q. 486.

    98.Ibid., evidence of Dr. Collie, Q. 3938.

    99.Ibid., Q. 3973.

    100.Ibid., p. 69, par. 348.

    101.Ibid., p. 72, par. 359.

    102.Ibid., par. 362.

    103.Ibid.

    104.Ibid., par. 363.

    105.Ibid., par. 364.

    106.Ibid., par. 365.

    107.Report of the National Labour Conference on the State Maintenance of Children, at the Guildhall, January 20, 1905, p. 25.

    108.Report of Select Committee on Education (Provision of Meals) Bills (England and Scotland), 1906, Qs. 792, 924, 925. By a considerable majority the Conference defeated an amendment that the Board of Guardians should be substituted for the Local Education Authority as the authority for making the provision, but owing to a technical difficulty the main resolution was not put. See also the resolution passed at a conference of the School Attendance Officers' Association, quoted by Mr. Slack in the House of Commons (Hansard, April 18, 1905, 4th Series, Vol. 145, p. 533).

    109.Hansard, July 9, 1903, Vol. 125, p. 194. See also ibid., February 14, 1905, Vol. 141, p. 143.

    110.Ibid., April 20, 1904, Vol. 133, pp. 782-3.

    111.Ibid., p. 784.

    112.Ibid., p. 788; Sir John Gorst, ibid., July 9, 1903, Vol. 125, p. 196.

    113.Hansard, March 13, 1905, Vol. 142, p. 1185.

    114.Report of the Inter-Departmental Committee on Medical Inspection and Feeding, 1905, Vol. I., p. vii.

    115.Ibid., pp. 54, 55, pars. 182, 186, 189. The total number of these agencies was 140. Of these 71 were permanent (i.e., had been in existence over a year), 24 were new, and 45 were intermittent in their operations.

    116.Ibid., pp. 78-80, pars. 290-293.

    117.Ibid., p. 79, par. 291.

    118."At present," declared one witness, "the funds are wasted through their being distributed over too large a number of children.... At one school ... the headmaster asked the boys whether they would like to have their ticket this week or next week." (Ibid., Vol. II., Q. 1780, evidence of Mr. T. E. Harvey.) At Norwich, a child received a meal only once a week. "There was no system of feeding the children regularly. They had to take it in turns." (Ibid., Q. 4228, evidence of Mrs. Pillow.) At Hull it was "a rough rule given to the teacher" that a child should be fed every other day. (Ibid., Qs. 6157, 6158, evidence of Mr. G. F. Grant.) See also evidence given by Mrs. Adler (Qs. 135-136), Mrs. Burgwin (Q. 446), and the Rev. J. C. Mantle (Q. 2452). It was even urged by Mr. Hookham, of Birmingham, that the insufficiency of the provision was a positive advantage. The fact "that there are more children wanting meals than can get them ... is the main safeguard against imposition." Without this safeguard, he declares, "you will lose the evidence which the children give against one another when imposition takes place, which I think is the most valuable of all evidence" (Ibid., Q. 1253.)

    119.Ibid., Vol. I., pp. 75-76, pars. 280-281. The meals given at Bradford were continued all through the year, and so were the breakfasts given by Mr. Hookham at Birmingham (ibid.).

    120.Ibid., p. 59, par. 208.

    121.Ibid., p. 75, par. 279.

    122.Ibid., pp. 84, 85, par. 306, secs. 3, 4.

    123.Ibid., p. 85, pars. 5, 6.

    124.Ibid., pp. 60, 61, pars. 210, 215.

    125.Ibid., pp. 62, 85, pars. 220, 306 (secs. 9, 10).

    126.Ibid., p. 66, par. 236. So far as the committee could discover, "the question of malnutrition and underfeeding has attracted very little attention in connection with medical inspection. There appears to be no area where the Medical Officer works in close touch with the organisations for the feeding of children." (Ibid., p. 25, par. 97.)

    127.Ibid., p. 68, par. 242.

    128.Ibid., p. 71, par. 258.

    129.Ibid., p. 58, par. 205. This was already being done in some rural schools. At Siddington, for instance, a hot dinner had been supplied for the last two years, the parents' payments more than covering the cost of the food. (Ibid., par. 202.) We have already alluded to the experiment at Rousdon, where dinners were provided throughout the year in a specially provided dining-room, as a part of the school organisation. Here the cost of the food was not quite covered by the parents' payments. (Ibid., par. 203.)

    130.Hansard, March 27 and 29, 1905, Vol. 143, pp. 1307-9, 1543.

    131.Ibid., April 18, 1905, Vol. 145, p. 531.

    132.Ibid., March 2, 1906, Vol. 152, p. 1394.

    133.Ibid., April 18, 1905, Vol. 145, p. 554. The balance of opinion was at this date in favour of the latter. Sir John Gorst thought that where the parents could not pay for the meals "reference should be made to the Poor Law authority, and the natural consequences of the receipt of public relief would follow." (Ibid., July 9, 1903, Vol. 125, p. 197.) In the Bill introduced by Mr. Claude Hay in March, 1905, provision was made for payment of the cost of meals by the Guardians, but any parent receiving such relief from the Guardians might apply to a court of summary jurisdiction and the court, "if satisfied that the parent's ... inability to pay is temporary and arises from no fault of his own," might make an order that he should not be disfranchised. (Elementary Education (Feeding of Children) Bill, 1905, clause 3.)

    134.For a description of the working of this order see the Report of the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws, 1909, 8vo. edition, Vol. III., pp. 160-162.

    135.Relief (School Children) Order, 1905, Article V. (in 35th Report of Local Government Board, 1905-6, p. 322).

    136.Ibid., Article II., sec. 2.

    137.Ibid., Article VI. Whether the amount was recovered or not the parent became a pauper, and was disfranchised.

    138.Ibid., Article VII.

    139."The whole Order," declared Mr. Wyatt, the Director of Elementary Education at Manchester, "was a most perplexing thing. Very early in the year there came down to Manchester a Poor Law Inspector who said that the construction of the Order was that the children of widows or deserted women should not come under the Order. That swept away a great many of those we had been feeding." (Report of Select Committee on Education (Provision of Meals) Bills (England and Scotland), 1906, Q. 1208.) Miss Margaret Frere was of opinion that the Order would be a dead letter in that it ruled out the two most difficult classes, one being widows and deserted wives. (Report of Inter-Departmental Committee on Medical Inspection and Feeding, 1905, Vol. II., Q. 483.)

    140.Circular of Local Government Board accompanying Relief (School Children) Order, in 35th Report of Local Government Board, 1905-6, p. 320.

    141.Circular issued by the Board of Education to the Local Education Authorities re Relief (School Children) Order, April 28, 1905.

    142.The order "has been so far practically a dead letter in this district" [the counties of Bedford, Hertford, Huntingdon, etc.]. (35th Report of Local Government Board, 1905-6, p. 452.) Such seems to have been the case also in Yorkshire and the northern counties, in Wales, in Essex and in Surrey, for we find no mention of the Order in the reports of the Inspectors for these districts.

    143.Minutes of the London County Council, July 11, 1905, p. 297. The Council objected to the introduction of a dual authority in every district, which would cause delay and possibly friction; the absence of any provision for uniformity of rules in the different districts; and the radical error of allowing the cost to fall on the local authorities instead of on Government funds, or at least on the rates of London as a whole. The risk of fathers being disfranchised as a result of meals being supplied by the Guardians to their children without their knowledge, would militate against the usefulness of the scheme (ibid.). As a matter of fact very few cases were relieved in London under the Order. (Hansard, July 31, 1906, Vol. 162, p. 680.) In two unions, Fulham and Wandsworth, where the Guardians offered to assist, the Council allowed lists to be sent from the schools, but the great majority of these children were reported by the Relieving Officers not to be underfed. (Report of Joint Committee on Underfed Children for 1905-6, p. 4.)

    144.At Bristol out of 129 applications from the Local Education Authority, the Guardians felt justified in giving relief in 12 cases only. (35th Report of Local Government Board, 1905-6, p. 480.) At Chorlton, relief was given in 219 cases out of 1,295 applications; at Salford in 175 out of 1,086. (Ibid., p. 504.) At Stoke-on-Trent, out of 72 cases reported 4 were relieved, and at Ecclesall Bierlow 51 cases were reduced after careful investigation to one. (Ibid., pp. 488, 520.) At Kettering, on the other hand, practically all the cases referred to the Guardians were relieved. (Report of Royal Commission on the Poor Laws, 1909, Appendix, Vol. I., Q. 6443.) This, however, was exceptional.

    145.At Birmingham it was found that many parents "were earning over 30s. a week, and in one case the parent was in constant employment with an average rate of £3 17s. 6d. a week." (35th Report of Local Government Board, 1905-6, p. 495.) At Bolton, some of the parents were receiving from £2 to £3 a week. (Ibid., p. 506.)

    146.In the Bolton Union, in cases where the father's income was considered sufficient to provide meals without assistance, "the children were specially watched and reported upon by the Cross Visitor each fortnight, until the Guardians were satisfied that the parents were carrying out their responsibility in this respect.... The Relieving Officer visits the home at meal time, or in the evening, to see what provision is made for feeding the children." (35th Report of Local Government Board, 1905-6, p. 503.) At Birmingham the head teachers were of opinion that the children were being better looked after by their parents than formerly owing to the way in which the Order was being carried out. (Ibid., p. 495.)

    147.Bradford City Council Proceedings, September 26, 1905.

    148.At the centres provided by the Guardians "the children were kept outside the doors until all was ready, and when they were allowed to enter they came in without any semblance of order, to tables without cloths, without seats." (Bradford and its Children: How They are Fed, by Councillor J. H. Palin, 1908, pp. 6-7.) Later the Guardians distributed the children among various little eating-houses in the town, where the food was better, though the conditions of serving were not much improved. (Ibid.)

    149.Hansard, February 28, 1906, Vol. 152, p. 1129; Bradford City Council Proceedings, September 26, 1905; see also the local newspapers about this time. The prosecutions were apparently confined to those cases where the underfeeding of the children was due to neglect on the part of the parents. The charge fixed by the Guardians was, however, very high, 3d. per meal. Up to March 1, 1906, action had been taken in the County Court against 51 men and orders for payment obtained in each case. (A short account of the working of the Relief (School Children) Order, issued by the Bradford Poor Law Union, 1906; Report of Select Committee on Education (Provision of Meals) Bills (England and Scotland), 1906, Qs. 1702-05.) In other unions there seems to have been little or no attempt to recover the cost. At Birmingham, for instance, it was reported, "the process of recovery laid down by the Local Government Board was farcical in character and was dropped." (Report of Royal Commission on the Poor Laws, 1909, Appendix, Vol. IV., Q. 43626, par. 37.)

    150.Extracts from the Annual Reports of the Bradford Education Committee for the four years ended March 31, 1907, 1908, 1909 and 1910 in respect to the working of the Education (Provision of Meals) Act, p. 3.

    151.At Birmingham the Free Dinner Society, after an existence of thirty years, ceased its operations when the Order came into force. (Report of the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws, 1909, Appendix, Vol. I., Q. 8525.) "There was at first," declared Mr. Jenner Fust, a Local Government Board Inspector, "much misapprehension among the public as to the scope of the Order, the prevalent idea being that all school children requiring it would now be supplied with free meals at the public expense, and that there was no further occasion for voluntary efforts." (35th Report of the Local Government Board, 1905-6, p. 506.)

    152.Hansard, December 6, 1906, vol. 166, p. 1284.

    153.The Bill was introduced by a private member, Mr. W. T. Wilson. The Government decided to make the matter an open question with their followers. (Ibid., February 22 and March 2, 1906, vol. 152, pp. 525, 1399.)

    154.For the debates on the Bill see Hansard, March 2, December 6, 7, 13, 19, 20 and 21, 1906 (vol. 152, pp. 1390-1448; vol. 166, pp. 1273-1292, 1315-1465; vol. 167, pp. 722-780, 1473-1482, 1629-1670, 1865-1881).

    155.See, for instance, the discussions at a conference of representatives of Charity Organisation Societies held in 1906. (Charity Organisation Review, July, 1906, pp. 30 et seq.)

    156.Mr. Harold Cox, Hansard, March 2, 1906, vol. 152, pp. 1412, 1417.

    157.Report of the Select Committee on the Education (Provision of Meals) Bills (England and Scotland), 1906, evidence of Mr. Mill, Chairman of Edinburgh School Board, Q. 4194.

    158.Ibid., evidence of Mr. Scott, Head Teacher of Wood Close School, Bethnal Green, Q. 2641. Cf. evidence of Dr. Kerr (Q. 2984), Miss Horn (Qs. 1321-2), and Mr. Ferguson (Q. 2739).

    159.Ibid., Qs. 1287-1290.

    160.Hansard, March 2, 1906, Vol. 152, p. 1441.

    161.Ibid., December 6, 1906, Vol. 166, p. 1280.

    162.Ibid., p. 1285.

    163.Ibid. See also the speeches of Mr. Jowett (ibid., March 2, 1906, Vol. 152, p. 1412), Mr. Claude Hay (ibid., December 6, 1906, Vol. 166, p. 1288) and the Earl of Crewe (ibid., December 19, 1906, Vol. 167, p. 1478). An amendment to substitute the Poor Law Guardians for the Local Education Authority as the authority for the administration of the Act was defeated by an overwhelming majority, the voting being 290 to 36. (Ibid., December 6, 1906, Vol. 166, pp. 1274-1288.) The Local Government Board did not, in fact, desire to have the duty imposed on them. (Mr. John Burns, ibid., p. 1285.)

    164.An amendment to limit the provision of meals to underfed children only was defeated by 230 votes to 39. Mr. Lough declared the amendment would strike at the root of one of the objects of the Bill. (Ibid., December 7, 1906, Vol. 166, pp. 1339-40, 1350.)

    165.Ibid., December 20, 1906, Vol. 167, p. 1637.

    166.6 Edward VII., c. 57.

    167.Ibid., clause 1.

    168.Ibid., clause 2. The Select Committee to which the Bill had been referred, while of opinion "that the local education authority ought to undertake the administration rather than the Boards of Guardians," nevertheless recommended that it should be the duty of the Guardians to recover the cost from neglectful parents. (Report of Select Committee on the Education (Provision of Meals) Bills (England and Scotland), 1906, pp. viii., x.) They accordingly inserted a provision to this effect (see the Education (Provision of Meals) Bill as amended by the Select Committee, No. 331 of 1906, clause 2). This was amended in the committee stage in the House of Commons. (Hansard, December 7, 1906, Vol. 166, pp. 1439-1444.

    169.6 Edward VII., c. 57, clause 4.

    170.Ibid., clause 3.

    171.Ibid., clause 6.

    172.Hansard, December 20, 1906, Vol. 167, pp. 1662-1670.

    173.Ibid., December 21, 1906, pp. 1865-1881.

    174.8 Edward VII., c. 63 (December 21, 1908). A Bill was introduced by the Government in 1907, but was withdrawn. (Hansard, March 20, 1907, Vol. 171, pp. 880-883.) For an account of the provision made in Scotland see Appendix II.

    175.Report of Select Committee on the Education (Provision of Meals) Bills (England and Scotland), 1906, p. vi.

    176.Aston Manor was the first town to apply for authority to levy a rate. Bradford, Manchester, and other towns soon followed. During the year ended March 31, 1908, 40 authorities were authorised to levy a rate. During the two following years the number was increased to 85 and 96 respectively. (Report on the Working of the Education (Provision of Meals) Act up to March 31, 1909, p. 8; Report of the Board of Education for 1908-9, p. 123; ditto for 1909-10, p. 62.)

    177.Appendix to Minutes of the Hull Education Committee, October 22, 1909.

    178.Report of the Scarborough Amicable Society for 1910, pp. 5, 8.

    179."Feeding the Children," by H. Beswick, in the Clarion, October 11, 1912.

    180.First Annual Report of the Leicester Children's Aid Association, 1907-8, p. 3.

    181.For a description of the methods adopted, see post, pp. 96-7. A somewhat similar system is in force at Chesterfield, where the arrangements for feeding are made by the Civic Guild, the expense being borne out of their funds. The Education Committee is represented on the General Council and Executive Committee of the Guild in a general sense, not in connection with feeding alone. Cases of children requiring food are reported by the Attendance Officers, and are fed at once by the Guild, investigation being made afterwards. If help is found necessary the whole family is adequately relieved. Arrangements are usually made for the children to be fed at eating-houses. The number of children so dealt with is very small.

    182.Hansard, April 23, 1909, 5th Series, Vol. 3, p. 1797.

    183.Education (Administrative Provisions) Bill, December 8, 1908; February 19, 1909; April 14, 1910; February 19, 1912; April 15, 1913.

    184.Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911, pp. 320-322, 329.

    185.The most important of these are Leicester, Sunderland, and Barnsley.

    186.See Report on the Working of the Education (Provision of Meals) Act up to March 31, 1909, p. 30, and (for London) p. 24; ditto for the year ended March 31, 1910, p. 20; Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1910, p. 309; ditto for 1911, p. 332. The voluntary contributions are understated in the figures for 1908-9, and possibly throughout. The returns for 1908-9, for instance, do not include Liverpool, where the whole cost was defrayed by voluntary contributions, and no financial details were supplied to the Board.

    The discrepancy in the total for 1911-12 is due to the fact that the figures in the several columns are not given exactly, but to the nearest £.

    187.Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911, pp. 322-24, 330.

    188.This does not include children fed at Day Industrial Schools, Open Air Schools or, with one or two exceptions, Special Schools for Mentally or Physically Defective Children.

    189.This number represents the average attendance at the ordinary Elementary Schools, not the total number on the rolls. (Statistics of Public Education in England and Wales, 1911-12, Part I., pp. 27, 333.)

    190.In 1908-9, by £1,645; in 1909-10, by £2,370; in 1910-11, by £1,163, and in 1911-12, by £374. (Report on the Working of the Education (Provision of Meals) Act up to March 31, 1909, p. 26; Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1910, p. 304; ditto for 1911, p. 317.)

    191.Hansard, April 23, 1909, 5th Series, Vol. 3, pp. 1862-1863. A similar complaint was received from Hartlepool. (Ibid.)

    192.See Minutes of Kingston-on-Hull Provision of Meals Sub-Committee, March 24, 1911, Appendix, p. 16. The abortive Bills introduced in 1908 and the following years by Labour members contained a clause that the limitation of the rate should be abolished.

    193."School Feeding," by Wm. Leach, in the Crusade, November, 1911 (Vol. 2, p. 192).

    194.For a fuller account of the arrangements made for providing food at the Day Industrial Schools and the Special Schools see post, pp. 117-122.

    195.Elementary Education (Defective and Epileptic Children) Act, 1899 (62 and 63 Vict., c. 32, sec. 1 (1)).

    196.As at Birkenhead, Bradford, Liverpool, Manchester, Nottingham, Stoke, West Ham.

    197.Report of School Medical Officer for Crewe, 1911, p. 23.

    198.Report of the School Medical Officer for Bournemouth for 1911, pp. 5-7.

    199."When a system of medical inspection of school children such as already exists under several Local Education Authorities has been established, the School Canteen Committee, so far as its operations are concerned with underfed, ill-nourished or destitute children, should work in intimate connection with the school medical officer." (Circular issued by the Board of Education, January 1, 1907, in Report on the Working of the Education (Provision of Meals) Act up to March 31, 1909, p. 44.) "It is obviously desirable that any arrangements made by a Local Education Authority under the Education (Provision of Meals) Act, 1906 ... should be co-ordinated, as far as possible, with the arrangements for medical inspection under the Act of 1907." (Board of Education, Code of Regulations for Public Elementary Schools in England, 1908, p. ii.) The general supervision of the administration of the Act was placed in the hands of the Board's Medical Department.

    200.Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1910, p. 254.

    201.Ibid. for 1911, p. 276. This course is strongly urged by the School Medical Officer for Portsmouth. "All children, however selected, either by the physical or poverty test, should be examined by the School Medical Officer. This in many areas would involve a good deal of extra work on many medical men who find their time already fully occupied. Yet if any work is worth doing it is worth doing well, and here it is that the value of the School Medical Officer comes in, by culling and recording facts relating to the personal condition of the child, as well as the home conditions and surroundings of his or her life." ("The Importance of a Well-advised and Comprehensive Scheme in the Selection of Children ... under the Education (Provision of Meals) Act," by Victor J. Blake, in Rearing an Imperial Race, edited by C. E. Hecht, 1913, pp. 22-23.)

    202.Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911, p. 275.

    203.Brighton Education Committee, Report of Canteen Joint Branch Sub-Committee, July 17, 1907. There were, of course, also the cases of "necessitous" children who did not appear on medical grounds to be suffering from malnutrition, but who, from the economic circumstances of the parents, were unable to obtain sufficient food. Children to whom the provision of a mid-day meal would be a convenience, and whose parents were able and willing to pay the cost, should also be provided for. (Ibid.)

    204.We have not been able to ascertain exactly what happens to these children on the "watching" list. In 1910 the School Medical Officer reports that they "are examined at intervals by the school doctor, and their progress is noted, the [Canteen] Committee taking such action as is recommended. Enquiries are also carried out by the school nurse, under the supervision of the school doctor, as to the nature of the meals given at home in these cases." (Report on the Medical Inspection of School Children in Brighton for 1910, p. 134.) These home visits by the school nurse are no longer paid.

    205.In 1911, out of 1,050 children who received free meals, 54 were not examined, 550 were recommended by the school doctor on medical grounds, 446 were fed solely on economic grounds. (Ibid. for 1911, p. 119.) In 1912, out of 1,070 children fed, 69 were not examined, 422 were recommended on medical and 579 on economic grounds. (Ibid. for 1912, p. 122.)

    206.Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911, p. 277.

    207.Report of School Medical Officer for Lancaster for 1911, p. 26.

    208.Report on the Working of the Education (Provision of Meals) Act, up to March 31, 1909, pp. 12-13.

    209.Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911, p. 273.

    210.Report of West Ham Education Committee for the year ending March 31, 1910, p. 51. This is the procedure now in force.

    211.See post, p. 110.

    212.We were informed by the head teacher of an infants' department that she did not insist on a note being sent more than two or three times a week.

    213.Report of Erith Education Committee for the three years ending March 31, 1911.

    214.The Public Feeding of Elementary School Children, by Phyllis D. Winder, 1913, p. 27.

    215.See post, pp. 145 et seq.

    216.Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1910, pp. 107-8; ditto for 1911, pp. 104-5. In several of the few towns where Care Committees have been appointed, they take no part in the work of feeding the children, their functions being confined to the "following up" of medical cases and perhaps the finding of employment for the children when they leave school.

    217.At Southend-on-Sea enquiry is made by the Civic Guild into many of the cases. (Report of the School Medical Officer for Southend-on-Sea for 1911, p. 54.) At Bradford the Canteen Committee communicates to the Guild of Help the names of all the new cases which are put on the feeding list. The members of the Guild thereupon visit any cases in which other help besides the meals is needed.

    218.As at Birkenhead, Birmingham, Leeds, Manchester, Salford, Sheffield, Stoke, etc. At Birkenhead an attendance officer has been specially appointed for this purpose. At Bradford a special constable has been told off to make enquiries in difficult cases.

    219.Thus, at Birkenhead, where the Canteen Committee meets very seldom, the cases are decided by the Chairman.

    220.The Public Feeding of Elementary School Children, by Phyllis D. Winder, 1913, p. 26.

    221.Report of Bootle School Canteen Committee, 1911-12, p. 3.

    222.Report of the Manchester Education Committee, 1910-11, p. 221.

    223.Report of the Bootle School Canteen Committee for 1910-11, p. 22. At Birkenhead, and probably in other towns, the percentage of children fed in the Church of England schools is very much higher than in the Council schools, whilst the Roman Catholic schools feed a larger number still than the Church schools. This is doubtless due partly to the character of the buildings, the non-provided schools being generally very much inferior, and the better-off children being consequently attracted to the Council schools; partly, of course, also to the fact that the Roman Catholic population is chiefly Irish and very poor.

    224.The Public Feeding of Elementary School Children, by Phyllis D. Winder, 1913, pp. 27, 29, 59, 62.

    225.Leicester Pioneer, October 29, 1910.

    226.Quarterly Report of the Leicester Children's Aid Association, July 1 to September 30, 1910.

    227.The Public Feeding of Elementary School Children, by Phyllis D. Winder, 1913, p. 29.

    228.Report of the School Medical Officer for Leicester for 1912, p. 36.

    229.See note on page 205, infra.

    230.Thus it was found at a school in Bethnal Green that, "in spite of the supervision of a most efficient Care Committee," the change from a porridge breakfast to a meat pie dinner doubled the number of children attending. ("The Feeding of Necessitous Children. A Symposium. I., Experience in S. W. Bethnal Green," by A. W. Chute, in Oxford House Magazine, January, 1909, p. 37.)

    231.At West Ham, for instance, where all the children on the feeding list receive both breakfast and dinner, the number of breakfasts given during the year 1911-12 was 247,233, and the number of dinners 273,894; the attendance at breakfast was thus only ninety per cent. of the attendance at dinner. (Report of the West Ham Education Committee for the year ended March 31, 1912, pp. 175-77.)

    232.See post, pp. 184-6.

    233.Bradford Education Committee, Report on a Course of Meals given to Necessitous Children from April to July, 1907, p. 7.

    234.Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911, pp. 322-324.

    235.Roughly about half the children fed receive both meals (Bradford Education Committee, Return as to the Working of the Education (Provision of Meals) Act, for the year ended March 31, 1913.)

    236.Enquiries made by the head teachers showed that in the aggregate 295 children received no mid-day meal or an insufficient meal. Since, presumably, these enquiries were made by the method of questioning the children, no particular value can be attached to the actual figures; the school attendance officers enquired into fifty-four of the cases taken at random and found that all but two showed undoubted poverty in the home. (Report of Bootle School Canteen Committee, 1910-11, pp. 10-11.)

    237.Ibid., p. 11. This is the plan still pursued (see post, pp. 86-87).

    238.London County Council, Report of the Medical Officer (Education) to Sub-Committee on Underfed Children, 1909. See also "School Feeding," by Dr. John Lambert, in Medical Examination of Schools and Scholars, edited by T. N. Kelynack, M.D., 1910, pp. 240-242.

    239.Report of the Education Committee of the London County Council, submitting report of the Medical Officer (Education) for the twenty-one months ending December 31, 1908, p. 17.

    240."The determination of the dietary of the children generally, and of individual children whose health or age renders it desirable that special arrangements should be made in their case" is, as the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education points out, a matter "on which the School Medical Officer is particularly competent to form an opinion, and on which, therefore, his opinion should be sought by the Authority." (Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911, p. 275.)

    241.Annual Report of the School Medical Officer for Stoke-on-Trent for 1911, p. 56.

    242.See the descriptions of Stoke and Liverpool, post, pp. 89, 90-91.

    243.See Bradford Education Committee, Report on a Course of Meals given to Necessitous Children from April to July, 1907, p. 7.

    244.For Bradford and some other typical menus see Appendix I.]

    245."The Importance of a Well-Advised and Comprehensive Scheme in the Selection of Children ... under the Education (Provision of Meals) Act," by Victor J. Blake, in Rearing an Imperial Race, edited by C. E. Hecht, 1913, p. 24.

    246.At one centre that we visited, the second helping consisted only of what was left by some of the children on their plates! Those who wanted more were asked to hold up their hands, and the food was then handed to them, the recipients being apparently selected at random, since there was not enough for all.

    247.Report of Chief School Medical Officer for Sheffield, for the year 1910, pp. 26, 27. See post, p. 190.

    248."The Importance of a Well-Advised and Comprehensive Scheme in the Selection of Children ... under the Education (Provision of Meals) Act," by Victor J. Blake, in Rearing an Imperial Race, edited by C. E. Hecht, 1913, p. 25.

    249.Board of Education, Code of Regulations for Public Elementary Schools in England, 1908, p. ii.

    250.Report on the Working of the Education (Provision of Meals) Act up to March 31, 1909, prefatory note by L. A. Selby-Bigge, p. 6.

    251.Report on the Working of the Education (Provision of Meals) Act for the year ended March 31, 1910, pp. 8, 9.

    252.Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911, pp. 278, 279.

    253.We describe two or three of these schools later. (See post, pp. 121-2.)

    254.At Birmingham we note the same defect. "The children are quiet and well-behaved; but all the time is taken in serving the food, and there is no opportunity to teach individual children to eat slowly. The tendency, especially with the cocoa breakfast, is to gulp down the drink, eat part of the bread and jam, and carry the rest away." (The Public Feeding of Elementary School Children, by Phyllis D. Winder, 1913, p. 42.)

    255.Report of Bootle School Canteen Committee, 1911-12, p. 10.

    256.Ibid., p. 11.

    257.Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911, p. 272.

    258.In many towns where meals are usually served at centres, local restaurants are utilised in outlying districts where the number of children is too small to allow of a centre being established.

    259.At one school, the children have the meal in the school, the food being sent in by a caterer, the head-mistress preferring that arrangement.

    260.In April, 1913.

    261.Annual Report of the School Medical Officer for Stoke-on-Trent, 1912, p. 23.

    262.This eating-house is situated in the poorest part of Acton, where the great majority of the children who are on the dinner-list live. In a few cases, where the children live in other districts, arrangements are made for them to obtain food at the cookery centres; this food they take home with them. This plan, we were told, is only adopted in cases where the mother can be trusted to see that the dinners are really eaten by the children for whom they are intended.

    263.Some were sent to the depÔts of the Food and Betterment Association.

    264.Interim Report of the Special Committee appointed to investigate the Insufficient or Improper Feeding of School Children, Liverpool City Council Proceedings, 1907-8, Vol. II., pp. 5, 15.

    265.Ibid., pp. 11, 12, 19.

    266.Ibid., pp. 17, 22, 23, 24. In one case where five coupons were given daily to five members of a family, it was found that the children took the coupons home every day, and at the end of the week these coupons were presented and value obtained. (Ibid., p. 21.)

    267.MS. Memorandum on the Feeding of School Children, by the Liverpool Fabian Society, 1908.

    268.The centres at Bradford, Leeds, West Ham and Birkenhead were all visited in the spring of 1913 and the descriptions refer to that date.

    269.In the secondary schools, the poorer children are allowed to act as monitors, being given in return a 3d. dinner free.

    270.Report of School Medical Officer for Bradford, 1909, pp. 100-1. At Nottingham the conditions are very similar to those at Bradford, the Education Committee having, in fact, modelled their policy on that of Bradford.

    271.Leeds Education Committee, Rules for the Management of Dining Centres.

    272.Complaints on both these points had, we were told, been made to the Education Committee, but, on the score of expense, nothing had been done.

    273.The meals are served at the schools in some room which is no longer needed for teaching purposes; in some cases, we believe, in a room which was specially built as a dining-room. We have included this example in the third class rather than in the first, since in each case the school serves as a centre for children from neighbouring schools.

    274.Report of the West Ham Education Committee for the year ended March 31, 1912, p. 52.

    275.Where the home conditions are extremely bad, provision is made for children to be fed at eating-houses, but such cases are very rare. At the time of our visit, in July, 1913, there was not one such case.

    276.Second Quarterly Report of the Children's Aid Association, November, 1907, to February, 1908, p. 3.

    277.Report on the Working of the Education (Provision of Meals) Act up to March 31, 1909, p. 17.

    278.The head teachers receive 5s. a week for supervising dinners, and 2s. 6d. for breakfasts; the assistant teachers 4s. and 2s. respectively. At Derby also the teachers are paid. (Report of the School Medical Officer for Derby, 1911, p. 61.) This payment is very exceptional.

    279.At Leeds, for instance, the teacher will perhaps be called on for a day or two every two months. At Liverpool a teacher is supposed to attend once a fortnight, but often no teacher at all is present. At Bootle the turn may be one day a week or a fortnight, or perhaps a week at a time; here the teachers, we were informed, voluntarily give their services "under protest," a fact which, when one considers the conditions under which they are asked to serve the meals, is not surprising.

    280."The Importance of a Well-Advised and Comprehensive Scheme in the Selection of Children ... under the Education (Provision of Meals) Act," by Victor J. Blake, in Rearing an Imperial Race, edited by C. E. Hecht, 1913, p. 24.

    281.Leeds Education Committee, Rules for the Management of Dinner Centres. At Bradford it is noticeable that it is as a general rule the men teachers who supervise the meals; women teachers assist, but the responsibility for the management of the whole centre seems to involve too great a strain upon them.

    282.Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911, p. 280.

    283.London's Children: How to Feed Them and How not to Feed Them, by Margaret McMillan and A. Cobden-Sanderson, 1909, p. 11. We have met with this ideal arrangement only at one school—a small "special" school for feeble-minded children at Bradford (see post, pp. 121-2.).

    284.Knives were used at Bradford for a time, but were given up, as it was found that the children hurt themselves. Their use demands, of course, much supervision, but they might be given to the elder children at any rate.

    285.At Birmingham "in one school the same mugs [for cocoa] were used twice over for different children without being washed. The supply of utensils at several of the schools was too small for the numbers fed." (The Public Feeding of Elementary School Children, by Phyllis D. Winder, 1913, p. 43.)

    286.See preamble to the Education (Provision of Meals) Act Amendment Bill, July 20, 1910. "This Bill introduces no new principle, but simply extends the Act to render permissible the continued operation of the Act during the holidays, a point which, when the original Act was passing through Parliament, it was generally thought was covered."

    287.Report on the Working of the Education (Provision of Meals) Act, up to March 31, 1909, p. 48.

    288.Hansard, July 12, 1910, 5th Series, Vol. 19, pp. 189-190. In 1910, out of the twenty-five or so Local Authorities who continued the meals during the holidays, about one-fifth paid for them out of the rates. (Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1910, p. 255.)

    289.Ibid., p. 254.

    290.Ibid., pp. 254-5; Report of West Ham Education Committee for the year ended March 31, 1910, pp. 45-6.

    291.The first report which was issued on the Working of the Provision of Meals Act gave the number of authorities who continued the meals during the school holidays—at that date 3 out of the 7 counties, and 32 out of the 105 county boroughs, boroughs and urban districts, who were making some provision under the Act (Report on the Working of the Education (Provision of Meals) Act, 1906, up to March 31, 1909, pp. 34-38). No figures are now available.

    292.Report of Bradford Education Committee for the year ended March 31, 1908.

    293.See letter from Bradford Ratepayers Association, in Bradford City Council Proceedings, August 10, 1909.

    294.In London, during the Christmas holidays, 1911-12, meals were provided out of a sum placed at the disposal of the Chairman of the Council by the General Purposes Committee, from the balance of the account in connection with the erection and management of the Coronation Procession stands. (Minutes of the London County Council, February 13, 1912, p. 2791.)

    295.Report of the West Ham Education Committee for the year ended March 31, 1910, p. 46; Ibid. for the year ended March 31, 1911, p. 39.

    296.Ibid. for the year ended March 31, 1912, pp. 50-1.

    297.The East Ham Echo, August 22, 1913.

    298.At Brighton meals were provided on Saturdays by the Local Education Authority out of the rates till January, 1909, when it was declared to be ultra vires. (Report on the Medical Inspection of School Children in Brighton for 1908, p. 99.)

    299.Minutes of the London County Council, February 2, 1909, p. 121; Minutes of the Education Committee, November 23, 1910, p. 991.

    300.Hansard, March 27, 1911, 5th Series, Vol. 23, pp. 1074-5.

    301.See Education (Administrative Provisions) Bills, April 14, 1910 (No. 128), February 19, 1912 (No. 18), April 15, 1913 (No. 101), which all contained a clause for provision of school meals during the holidays; Education (Provision of Meals) Act Amendment Bills, July 20, 1910 (No. 265); April 19, 1911 (No. 181); March 13, 1912 (No. 82); April 16, 1913 (No. 109).

    302.Hansard, March 28, 1912, 5th Series, Vol. 36, p. 598.

    303.Hansard, July 22, 1913, Vol. 55, pp. 1910-11.

    304.See post, pp. 184-7.

    305.This may be through lack of funds, as at East Ham (see ante, p. 56), but is not always due to this cause.

    306.See, for instance, Hansard, December 6, 1906, 4th Series, Vol. 166, p. 1283; December 7, 1906, pp. 1340, 1344. See also ibid., July 9, 1903, Vol. 125, p. 196, and April 20, 1904, Vol. 133, p. 788.

    307.Report on Working of the Education (Provision of Meals) Act up to March 31, 1909, p. 41.

    308.Ibid., p. 42.

    309.Ibid., p. 33.

    310.The amount was £1,570 out of a total of £157,127. (Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911, p. 332.)

    311.For provision made for paying children in Scottish towns, see Appendix II., pp. 242, 245, 246.

    312.Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911, pp. 325-7, 331. In eleven other towns the parents in some cases paid part of the cost.

    313."The needs would be met of a host of children who never got a decent meal." (Councillor North, Bradford City Council Proceedings, February 26, 1907, p. 233.)

    314.Extracts from the Annual Reports of the Bradford Education Committee for the four years ended March 31, 1907, 1908, 1909 and 1910, pp. 14, 16. The charge is now 2-1/2d.

    315.The numbers given in the Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911 (p. 325) are 182, but some of these were paid for by the Guardians. No record, we were told, is kept of the individual children who pay, but the amount received in 1912-13 from parents who voluntarily paid the whole cost was £169 19s. 8d. Thus only some 16,320 meals were wholly paid for, out of a total of 782,979. (Bradford Education Committee, Return as to the Working of the Provision of Meals Act for the year ending March 31, 1913.)

    316.At Finchley as many as two-thirds of the meals are paid for, but the charge is very low, only 1/2d. per meal. We were informed that the price would not cover the cost of food if it were not for the fact that the meat used in connection with the dinners was provided as a voluntary gift.

    317.This was the opinion of the Inter-Departmental Committee on Medical Inspection and Feeding in 1905. (See ante, p. 37.) "If no distinction is made between the paying children and the non-paying children," declared one witness, "I feel sure that the Birmingham artisan would not send his children. He would not let them go to receive a meal in regard to which it was not known whether it was given free or not." (Report of the Inter-Departmental Committee on Medical Inspection and Feeding, 1905, Vol. II., Q. 1246, evidence of Mr. George Hookham.) See also the evidence given by Mr. F. Wilkinson, the Director of Education for Bolton. (Ibid., Qs. 3115-3119.)

    318.See post, p. 120.

    319.See post, pp. 123-5.

    320.The amount recovered after prosecution in 1911-12 was £42 10s. 6d. for the whole of England and Wales, London accounting for more than half this sum. (Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911, pp. 325-7.) To this we must add the amount recovered with more or less difficulty, but without prosecution.

    321.See ante, p. 64.

    322.Report of the West Ham Education Committee for the year ending March 31, 1912, p. 54.

    323.In 1911 proceedings were taken against parents in only eight towns, including London. The number of cases was 219, of which 147 were in London. (Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911, pp. 325-327.)

    324.Report on the work of the Bootle School Canteen Committee, 1910-11, p. 21. Since this date the Committee have accordingly made no attempt to prosecute parents for repayment of the cost.

    325.Extracts from Annual Reports of Bradford Education Committee for the four years ended March 31, 1907, 1908, 1909 and 1910, p. 13.

    326.At Bradford a child who is underfed through neglect is put on the feeding-list for a month before the bill is sent to its parents, so that it may receive the benefit of the meals for this period at any rate.

    327.8 Edward VII., c. 67, sec. 12.

    328.Report of the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws and Relief of Distress, 1909, 8vo edition, Vol. III. (Minority Report), p. 36.

    329.Occasionally, as we have seen, the Guardians are represented on the Canteen Committee, as at Crewe.

    330.First Annual Report of the Leicester Children's Aid Association, 1907-8, p. 4.

    331.Report of the School Medical Officer for Dewsbury for 1911, p. 41.

    332.Bradford City Council Proceedings, June 16, 1908, p. 395; April 11, 1911, p. 305.

    333.Thus the minimum relief for a widow is 4s., with 2s. each for the first two children, and 1s. each for other children. In addition five dinners a week, amounting in value to 1s. 0-1/2d., are given to all children attending school. (Bradford Poor Law Union, Outdoor Relief Arrangements.)

    334.Bradford Education Committee, Return as to the Working of the Provision of Meals Act for the year ending March 31, 1913.

    335.Report of the School Medical Officer for Blackburn, 1911, p. 218. Out of 59,537 meals given during the year, the Guardians paid for 17,786, or nearly one-third.

    336.Report of the Huddersfield Education Committee, 1911, p. 23.

    337.Report of Brighton Education Committee for the year ending March 31, 1912, p. 28.

    338.For the arrangements made between the Liverpool Education Committee and the Guardians with regard to payment for children admitted as voluntary cases to the Day Industrial Schools, see post, p. 118 n.

    339.Report of the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws and Relief of Distress, 1909, 8vo edition, Vol. III. (Minority Report), p. 166 n.

    340.Thus at Manchester, the Education Committee and the Guardians send lists of their cases to the District Provident Society, and the Secretary lets each Authority know what the other is doing.

    341.It is impossible to give any figures as to the overlapping that exists, since the practice varies so much in different towns, and in many cases no records are kept.

    342.Elementary Education Act, 1876 (39 and 40 Vic., c. 79), sec. 16 (4); Children Act, 1908 (8 Edward VII., c. 67), sec. 79; "Day Industrial Schools," by J. C. Legge, in Proceedings of National Conference on the Prevention of Destitution, 1911, p. 360.

    343.Children Act, 1908, sec. 82 (1).

    344.Ibid., sec. 79.

    345."Day Industrial Schools," by J. C. Legge, in Proceedings of National Conference on the Prevention of Destitution, 1911, p. 361. For many years an arrangement has been in force by which the Liverpool Select Vestry pay the Local Education Authority 9d. a week in respect of each child in their area admitted as a voluntary scholar. (Ibid.) A few years ago the Guardians of the Toxteth Union agreed, in such cases, where the parent was in receipt of outdoor relief, to increase the relief by 6d. on condition that this was paid to the Education Authority. (Ibid., p. 362.) The West Derby Guardians pay a lump sum of £40 a year.

    346.Report of the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws, 1909. 8vo edition, Vol. III., p. 165.

    347.Report of the Departmental Committee on Reformatory and Industrial Schools, 1913, p. 62.

    348.Fifty-fifth Report on Reformatory and Industrial Schools, 1911, Part I., pp. 28-30; Part II., p. 20. Two of the schools in England have since been closed, and the school at Leeds is shortly to be given up.

    349.Ibid., Part I., pp. 267-292; Part II., p. 20.

    350.Ibid., Part II., p. 19.

    351.Report of the Departmental Committee on Reformatory and Industrial Schools, 1913, p. 62.

    352.Report of School Medical Officer for Eastbourne for 1912, p. 46.

    353.The majority pay about 6d. a week. In the case of physically defective children the parent's payment is intended to meet the expenses of dinner, any medicines or dressings that may be necessary, and the cost of conveyance. It does not, of course, nearly cover these charges.

    354.In 1911 there were only nine Open Air Schools, maintained by eight authorities. (Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911, p. 215.)

    355.At Darlington only a mid-day meal is provided.

    356.At Norwich the charge varies from 6d. to 1s. 6d.; at Sheffield, from 6d. to 2s. 6d.; at Halifax it may amount to 3s. At Barnsley all the parents are charged 2s. 6d. per week, no children being admitted without payment. At Bradford the meals are given free to all.

    357.See ante, pp. 95-6.

    358.At one of these schools, the mentally defective children were having their dinner in one room, the physically defective in an adjoining room. All the children stay for the meal. The headmistress supervised, assisted by a teacher for the mentally defective, and the school nurse for the physically defective children. Tablecloths were provided for the latter, but not for the former. The dinner was cooked by the children who had been attending the cookery class in the morning; the children laid the tables, and monitors helped to serve the food.

    359.In East Sussex, for instance, where particulars were supplied by the teachers as to the meals brought by eleven of the children, it was found that the food was totally inadequate, in most cases consisting of bread and butter, or cake, with perhaps a small piece of cheese or an apple. Two children of five years old, who had to walk two miles to school, brought, one of them bread and butter only, the other cake. Three children, who had to walk three and a half miles, brought either cake or only bread. ("The Diet of Elementary School Children in Country Districts," by Dr. George Finch, in Rearing an Imperial Race, edited by C. E. Hecht, 1913, p. 29.) In a Bedfordshire school out of 62 children who brought their dinner to school with them, one had an apple tart, three had bread and cheese, while 58 had "bread with a thin layer of butter or lard on it, or else bread and jam, or bread and syrup. This meal was washed down with water, as nothing hot was obtainable." ("How the Family of the Agricultural Labourer Lives," by Ronald T. Herdman, reprinted in Rearing an Imperial Race, p. 341.)

    360.Thus at Brynconin, where 85 children are supplied daily with cocoa for a weekly charge of 1d., the week's expenditure on cocoa, sugar and milk amounts to 6s. 6d., and the children's payments to 6s. 10d. (Report of the School Medical Officer for Pembrokeshire for 1912, p. 14.) See also Reports of the School Medical Officer for Hampshire (1910), p. 25; for the Isle of Ely (1910), p. 18; for Gloucestershire (1910), p. 53; for East Suffolk (1910), p. 19; for West Sussex (1911), p. 10. Sometimes the cocoa is provided free through the generosity of the teachers. (See Report of Monmouthshire Education Committee on the Medical Inspection Department for 1910, p. 9.)

    361.Report of the School Medical Officer for Hampshire for 1910, p. 25.

    362.For sample menus, see Appendix I., p. 236.

    363.For instance, the cost of the food for the dinners for twelve weeks amounted to £7 9s. 8d., and the children's payments to £7 9s. 5d. On cold snowy mornings hot cocoa is provided before morning school for all the children. The cost of this is, we gather, borne entirely by the headmaster and his wife.

    364.Yorkshire Post, July 9, 1908.

    365."The Diet of Elementary School Children in Country Districts," by Dr. George Finch, in Rearing an Imperial Race, edited by C. E. Hecht, 1913, p. 109.

    366.Report of the School Medical Officer for Hampshire, 1910, p. 24.

    367.Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911, p. 284.

    368.Ibid., pp. 283-4.

    369.As we have seen, the Inter-Departmental Committee on Medical Inspection and Feeding in 1905 recommended that managers of country schools should arrange, during the winter at any rate, to provide either a hot dinner or soup or cocoa for children who lived too far away to go home at mid-day. (See ante, p. 38.)

    370."The Diet of Elementary School Children in Country Districts," by Dr. George Finch, in Rearing an Imperial Race, edited by C. E. Hecht, 1913, p. 109.

    371.See post, pp. 237-8.

    372.See ante, pp. 16-27.

    373.Report of the Joint Committee on Underfed Children, for 1906-7, p. 2.

    374.Fourth Annual Report of the Joint Committee on Underfed Children, 1904, pp. 1-2; Report of Inter-Departmental Committee on Medical Inspection and Feeding, 1905, Qs. 1649, 1650 (evidence of Mr. T. E. Harvey). Even in 1908 there were 74 schools at which feeding took place which had not a properly constituted committee. (London County Council, Report by Executive Officer (Education), Appendix A to agenda of Sub-Committee on Underfed Children, July 6, 1908.)

    375."There is supposed to be a committee in every school," said one headmaster, "but the committees never meet in the vast majority of cases, and if they do, they never undertake personal investigation." (Report of the Select Committee on the Education (Provision of Meals) Bills (England and Scotland), 1906, Q. 849, evidence of Mr. Marshall Jackman.) "There is [a Relief Committee] in accordance with the rules," declared another headmaster, but "the Committee acts really through the head teachers.... The Committee say that the teachers have their confidence, and they could not do any good by attempting themselves to help as a committee, and therefore they do not help." (Report of the Inter-Departmental Committee on Medical Inspection and Feeding, 1905, Q. 5149 (evidence of Mr. T. P. Shovelier.) See also Ibid., Qs. 4773 A, 4937-4939, 6233, 6265.

    376.See, for instance, Report of Inter-Departmental Committee on Medical Inspection and Feeding, 1905, Qs. 185, 5154.

    377."The duty of making enquiries by the managers, or by outsiders working for them, into the home conditions of the children is, with some remarkable exceptions, seldom well done, and often not done at all. They are authorised to invite assistance from attendance officers, ... from Charity Organisation Society visitors, district visitors, country holiday fund visitors, and similar persons, but we have very seldom found that this class of person has been consulted." (Report of the Joint Committee on Underfed Children for 1906-7, p. 23.)

    378.Ibid. for 1904-5, p. 5.

    379.Ibid. for 1906-7, Appendix G., p. 23.

    380.Ibid., p. 2.

    381.Fourth Annual Report of the Joint Committee on Underfed Children, 1904, p. 2. Evidence was given before the Inter-Departmental Committee on Medical Inspection and Feeding in 1905, which showed that difficulty was experienced in collecting sufficient funds. The London Schools Dinner Association found that people would contribute at Christmas time, but in the early spring, when the work was heaviest, the subscriptions ceased. (Report of the Inter-Departmental Committee on Medical Inspection and Feeding, 1905, Qs. 2074, 2081-2083.) See also evidence of Mr. Marshall Jackman before the Select Committee on the Education (Provision of Meals) Bills (England and Scotland), 1906, Qs. 780, 788-790.

    382.Report of Inter-Departmental Committee on Physical Deterioration, 1904, Q. 477.

    383.Minutes of the London County Council, April 11, 1905, p. 1381.

    384.Ibid., July 11, 1905, p. 297.

    385.Ibid., p. 298.

    386.The experiment was later extended to fifteen schools.

    387.Report of the Select Committee on the Education (Provision of Meals) Bills, 1906, Qs. 451, 500, evidence of Mr. A. J. Shepheard.

    388.Ibid., Q. 327.

    389.The tables were "nicely laid and with tablecloths, with all the ordinary appliances and requirements of a table put there, such as salt cellars, knives and forks, and everything of that kind. The tables were laid out with flowers ... I think I may quite certainly say that some of these children had never sat down to a meal of that description in their lives." (Ibid., Q. 331.)

    390.Minutes of the London County Council, December 19, 1905, p. 2138. About eighty per cent. of the meals were paid for by the parents, the remaining twenty per cent. being paid for by friends or voluntary agencies. (Report of the Select Committee on the Education (Provision of Meals) Bills, 1906, Q. 326.)

    391.When, in 1904, the London School Board was superseded by the London County Council, the Joint Committee on Underfed Children had been continued by the latter body, its constitution remaining practically unaltered. (London County Council, Report of Education Committee, 1908-9, Part II., p. 3.)

    392.This Sub-Committee was known at first as the Sub-Committee on Underfed Children. In December, 1908, the name was altered to the Children's Care (Central) Sub-Committee. (Ibid., p. 4.)

    393.See Minutes of the London County Council, November 24, 1908, p. 1120.

    394."State Feeding of School Children in London," by Sir Charles Elliott, in Nineteenth Century, May, 1909, p. 866.

    395.London County Council, Report of the Education Committee for 1908-9, Part II., p. 4.

    396.The local Relief Committees had been re-organised under the name of Children's Care Committees in July, 1907. (Ibid.)

    397.The numbers greatly increased during the winter of 1907-8, and reached a maximum of 49,043 in March, 1908. (London County Council, Report on the Home Circumstances of Necessitous Children in twelve selected schools, 1908, p. 2.)

    398.Ibid.

    399.Ibid., pp. 7-8, 22.

    400.Ibid., p. 24.

    401.Ibid., p. 25.

    402.Ibid., p. 25. See also the description of the methods employed at typical schools. (Ibid., pp. 19, 20.)

    403.Ibid., p. 22.

    404.Ibid., p. 27.

    405.A few Care Committees were already carrying out these functions. See, for instance, the description of the methods adopted at one school (Ibid., p. 19, No. C.)

    406.Minutes of the London County Council, April 6, 1909, pp. 855-6.

    407.Minutes of the London County Council, April 6, 1909, pp. 856, 857; Handbook containing general information with reference to Children's Care, 1912, pp. 7-8, 88.

    408.Report on the Home Circumstances of Necessitous Children in twelve selected schools, 1908, p. 3.

    409.Thus at St. Giles'-in-the-Fields the expenditure on the provision of food is still met from voluntary funds. At Hampstead, in all the schools except one or two, the provision of food for necessitous children is paid for by the Hampstead Council of Social Welfare. The Care Committee refers to the Council of Social Welfare cases which are suitable for home relief, i.e., cases where the mother can be trusted to look after the children at home; in these cases adequate relief for the whole family is given by the Council. If the mother cannot be trusted or if she goes out to work all day, the children receive meals at the feeding centre, the Council paying for these meals.

    410.These are necessitous children only. This number includes the necessitous children in the Defective Schools, except the Cripple Schools, where the meals are provided by the Cripple Children's Dinners Committee. (See post, pp. 155-6.)

    411.Annual Report of London County Council for 1911, Vol. IV., p. 33. The figures for the earlier years are not reliable owing to the multiplicity of agencies providing food.

    412.The teachers are asked to point out to the school doctor any children about to be inspected whose names are on the necessitous register. (London County Council, Handbook containing general information with reference to Children's Care, 1912, p. 18.)

    413.For examples of Care Committees in provincial towns, see ante, pp. 65-66. In one or two Scottish towns also Care Committees have been formed (see post, pp. 240, 241, 244-5.)

    414.In addition to the ordinary elementary schools, Care Committees have been formed also for the Special Schools for Defective Children, with the exception of the Physically Defective.

    415.In a few cases the committees are composed entirely, or almost entirely, of working men.

    416.In 1908 the Care Committees were very largely composed of teachers. Out of the total membership of 2,939, 1,278, or about three-sevenths, were teachers, 1,391 were school managers, and only 270 were voluntary workers. (London County Council, Agenda for Sub-Committee on Underfed Children, Appendix A, July 6, 1908.)

    417.London County Council, list of members of Children's Care (School) Committees, 1912.

    418.At the end of 1911, organisations for the supply of boots were in existence in 1,012 schools. These organisations were controlled by the Care Committees, managers, or head teachers. (Report of the London County Council for 1911, Vol. IV., p. 38.)

    419."Care Committee Work in Liverpool," by F. J. Marquis, in the School Child, September, 1913, p. 11.

    420."Care Committees," by A. S., in the School Child, March 1913, pp. 4-5.

    421.See ante, pp. 139-140.

    422.Enquiries from the employers may not be made by the Care Committee without the consent of the parent or guardian. Where the committee is doubtful of the accuracy of the parents' statements, the case can be referred to the Divisional Superintendent, who may make such enquiries.

    423.London County Council, Handbook containing general information with reference to Children's Care, 1912, pp. 18-19.

    424.Thus in three schools in South London, attended by children whose home circumstances were very similar, the majority of the parents being casual labourers, the percentages of children who were receiving free meals in March, 1913, were 1.8, 2.9 and 7.5. In another neighbouring school, where the children were very little poorer, nineteen per cent. were being fed.

    425.The most extreme example of the "strict" type is the committee which deals with a group of schools in St. George's-in-the-East. It is held that, the provision of meals being merely a form of relief, the work should be as far as possible dissociated from the school; the parents do not make application to the teachers but to a central office.

    426."Having regard to the varying circumstances and conditions of families, it is considered undesirable to fix a minimum wage which would justify children being provided with school meals, and each case should therefore be considered upon its own merits." (London County Council, Handbook containing general information with reference to Children's Care, 1912, p. 22.)

    427.That is, 3s. for an adult and 2s. 3d. for a child. (Poverty, by B. Seebohm Rowntree, 1901, p. 110.)

    428.Handbook containing general information with reference to Children's Care, 1912, p. 20.

    429.The County Council, a few months ago, drew attention to the lack of uniformity prevailing. "In a number of cases it has been found that the form has not been issued, with the result that Care Committees dealing with part of a family are unacquainted with the relief afforded by another Care Committee." (London County Council Gazette, March 3, 1913, p. 210.)

    430."School Care Committees," by Maude F. Davies, in Progress, July, 1910, p. 177.

    431.At St. George's-in-the-East five committees have been amalgamated and then re-divided into two, one dealing with all the Jewish, one with all the Christian, children of the group. Overlapping is thus almost completely avoided.

    432.London County Council Minutes, November 2, 1909, p. 841.

    433.The charge includes the cost of preparation and service of the meals, and is calculated to the nearest farthing. (London County Council, Handbook containing general information with reference to Children's Care, 1912, pp. 27-28.)

    434.In 1912-13 the number of individual children who paid the full cost of the meals was 2,521, that is, only one-fortieth of the number of "necessitous" children who were fed. The amount so received was £863.

    435.In 1911-12 the expenditure on food materials amounted to £4,273 2s. 0d., and the payments for dinners to £4,206 15s. 9d. Out of a total of 523,266 dinners supplied, only 33,043, or 6·3 per cent., were given free. The average cost of the dinner, for food materials only, was 1·96d. (Report of Cripple Children's Dinners Committee for 1911-12, pp. 10, 11.)

    436.London County Council, Agenda for Sub-Committee on Underfed Children, Appendix A., July 6, 1908.

    437.London County Council, Report on the Home Circumstances of Necessitous Children in twelve selected schools, 1908, p. 25.

    438.For menus, see Appendix I.

    439.Minutes of London County Council, December 20, 1910, p. 1491.

    440.Frequently the infants are placed with the older children at the ordinary tables, which are too high for them to reach up to with any comfort; it is sometimes impossible for them to eat without spilling their food. (See the description of a feeding centre, post, p. 167.)

    441.London County Council, Handbook containing general information with reference to Children's Care, 1912, p. 31.

    442.The payment is 7s. 6d. a week. (Ibid., p. 34.)

    443.Ibid., pp. 29-30.

    444.Ibid., pp. 32-33.

    445.These centres were all visited in the spring, summer or autumn of 1913. We describe some typical examples in the Appendix to this chapter.

    446.In 1911, as the result of an inspection of all the feeding centres by the school doctors, it was reported that "in one-fifth ... the conditions required material improvement, to make the giving of these meals an educational function, and to impress the hygiene of proper eating and cleanliness on the children." (Annual Report of the London County Council for 1911, Vol. III., p. 170.)

    447.London County Council, Report on the Home Circumstances of Necessitous Children in twelve selected schools, 1908, p. 22.

    448.Annual Report of London County Council for 1910, Chapter XLI., p. 7.

    449.Minutes of the London County Council, February 15, 1910, p. 175.

    450.Ibid., July 26-27, 1910, p. 319.

    451.London County Council Gazette, May 29, 1911, p. 370.

    452.School Child, February, 1912, p. 4.

    453.Minutes of London County Council, November 5, 1912, p. 1093; London County Council Gazette, January 20, 1913, p. 65.

    454.See ante, p. 141 n.

    455.Most of the cases of overlapping are, of course, cases in which the Guardians are granting out-relief. There are also the cases where the Guardians are relieving a widow by maintaining some of her children in Poor Law schools, but the mother has not sufficient income adequately to maintain the remaining child or children.

    456.Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1910, p. 26.

    457.Ibid., p. 1.

    458.Ibid., p. 26.

    459.Hansard, April 10, 1913, Vol. 51, p. 1381; The Health and Physique of School Children, by Arthur Greenwood, 1913, p. 48.

    460.Ibid., p. 50.

    461."The Medical Examination of School Children," by Dr. A. S. Arkle, a paper read at the North of England Education Conference, January, 1907 (reprinted in School Government Chronicle, Supplement, January 12, 1907, pp. 77, 89). As we have already said, the nutrition cannot be determined solely by weight. "In fact," as a School Medical Officer points out, "an ill-nourished child may be above the average weight, or, on the other hand, a healthy child may be much under the average and yet not be ill-nourished." (Report of the School Medical Officer for Leeds for 1910, p. 27.) But when dealing with large numbers of children, the average weight furnishes a reliable index of nutrition.

    462.Report by Dr. Leslie Mackenzie and Captain A. Foster, on the Physical Condition of Children attending the Public Schools of the School Board of Glasgow, 1907, p. v.

    463.Report of the School Medical Officer for East Ham for 1911, p. 56.

    464.Ibid., p. 57.

    465.The School Medical Officer for Cumberland found that whilst, at the age of 3 to 4, 28·4 per cent. of the boys and 38·7 per cent. of the girls were classified as good, "the percentages diminish gradually till at the age of 7 to 8 they are only 12·8 and 15·9, but from 20·4 and 29·7 at the age of 12 to 13 they gradually rise to 36·0 and 34·6 at the age of 14 to 15. Probably in most cases the condition of the teeth is responsible for this falling off in condition. In the early years of life, before the teeth begin to go bad, the nutrition is good, but gradually gets worse as time goes on and more teeth decay, but nutrition again improves after the eruption of the permanent teeth, which, of course, are in the majority of cases sound for some little time." (Report of the School Medical Officer for Cumberland for 1911, p. 20.)

    466."The cleanliness of the houses and especially of the bedrooms ... has an important bearing on nutrition." (Report of the School Medical Officer for Congleton for 1911, p. 4.) A School Medical Officer in London told us that if a child improved in the point of cleanliness there was a marked improvement also in nutrition.

    467.Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1910, pp. 29-30.

    468.Ibid., for 1911, p. 30.

    469.Report of the School Medical Officer for Bootle for 1912, p. 17.

    470.Report of the School Medical Officer for Wolverhampton for 1911, p. 28.

    471.Ibid., p. 32.

    472.Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911, p. 25.

    473.Report of the School Medical Officer for Congleton for 1911, p. 4.

    474.Report of the School Medical Officer for Hornsey for 1911, p. 14.

    475.Report of the School Medical Officer for 1911, in Report of the Manchester Education Committee, 1910-11, p. 242.

    476.Report of the School Medical Officer for Kidderminster for 1911, p. 2.

    477.Report upon a Study of the Diet of the Labouring Classes in the City of Glasgow carried out during 1911-12, by Dorothy E. Lindsay, B.Sc., 1913, pp. 5-6.

    478.Ibid., p. 27. The numbers in each group are so small that the average does not furnish a reliable index, but that the conclusion drawn from the figures is warranted is shown by the fact that of the 27 families in the first four groups (excluding one case where the circumstances are abnormal), 8 have a dietary yielding over 3,500 calories of energy and only 6 fall below the minimum of 3,000, while of the 22 families in the remaining groups (excluding two abnormal cases), only one has a dietary yielding over 3,500 calories, while no less than 16 fall below the minimum. (Ibid., pp. 12-23.) Here, of course, again we have the question of wrong feeding. In many cases the income could have been laid out to better advantage. "Where one family gets nearly their minimum adequate diet on an expenditure of 5·1 pence per man per diem ... others on an expenditure of nearly 9d. fail to secure it." (Ibid., p. 29.)

    479.Ibid., p. 30.

    480.The actual number of children examined is not stated.

    481.The Medical Inspection of School Children, by Dr. W. Leslie Mackenzie, assisted by Dr. E. Matthew, 1904, p. 196.

    482.Report of the School Medical Officer for Blackburn for 1911, p. 190.

    483.Report of the School Medical Officer for Leeds for 1912, p. 30.

    484."The Physical Conditions of School Children," by Dr. Ralph H. Crowley, North of England Education Conference, January, 1907 (reprinted in the School Government Chronicle, Supplement, January 12, 1907, pp. 80-81).

    485."The Medical Examination of School Children," by Dr. A. S. Arkle, in School Government Chronicle, Supplement, January 12, 1907, p. 78.

    486.Report of the School Medical Officer for Wolverhampton for 1911, p. 24. (Quoted in Report of Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911, p. 24.)

    487.Report of Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911, p. 24.

    488.Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1911, p. 286.

    489.Bradford Education Committee, Report on a Course of Meals given to necessitous children from April to July, 1907.

    490.Ibid., p. 3.

    491.Ibid., pp. 4, 5.

    492."The average gain per year of children of this class and size," Dr. Crowley points out, "is not more than two kilos (4 lbs. 6 oz.) for the whole year." (Ibid., p. 9.)

    493.Ibid., pp. 9-11. As Dr. Crowley points out, several points have to be considered in interpreting the effect on weight. "The increase in the weight of children normally varies greatly at different seasons of the year," and "at any given season fluctuates much, sometimes, comparatively, even from week to week. The proportional increase in weight varies with the age of the child, or rather with the weight to which the child has already attained." (Ibid., p. 8.)

    494.Ibid., p. 8.

    495.Report on the Working of the Education (Provision of Meals) Act up to March 31, 1909, pp. 14-15.

    496.MS. Report on Lambeth School Children Feeding Experiment, by Dr. L. Haden Guest, 1908.

    497.We have, unfortunately, not been able to obtain a copy of the figures on which Dr. Haden Guest's report is based.

    498.In the case of the boys, their weights, during this week, only increased a little; those of the girls remained stationary.

    499.Report of Chief School Medical Officer for Sheffield for 1910, pp. 26-27. We may quote here striking results observed in the improved physique of the children at a special school for cripple children in London consequent on an improved dietary. A two-course dinner of meat, potatoes and pudding had been previously given, but in the summer of 1901 it was decided to provide a more liberal and varied dietary, e.g., more hot meat, eggs, milk, cream, vegetables and fruit. The results were soon apparent. "Partially paralysed children," writes Mrs. Humphry Ward a few months after the change, "have been recovering strength in hands and limbs with greater rapidity than before. A child who, last year, often could not walk at all from rickets and extreme delicacy and seemed to be fading away, and who in May was still languid and feeble, is now racing about in the garden on his crutches; a boy who last year could only crawl on his hands and feet is now rapidly and steadily learning to walk, and so on.... Hardly any child now wants to lie down during school time, whereas applications to lie down used to be common, and the children both learn and remember better." (Letter from Mrs. Humphry Ward, The Times, September 26, 1901.)

    500.Brighton Education Committee, Report on the re-examination of children receiving free meals during the winter session, 1912-13.

    501.Annual Report of London County Council for 1910, Vol. III., p. 130.

    502.MS. Report by Dr. L. Haden Guest on Lambeth School Children Feeding Experiment, 1908.

    503.Report of School Medical Officer for Macclesfield for 1911, p. 18.

    504.Ibid. for Workington for 1911, p. viii.

    505.Ibid. for Hastings for 1911, p. 14.

    506.Report of School Medical Officer for Newcastle-on-Tyne for 1910, p. 49.

    507.Report of School Medical Officer for Manchester for 1911, pp. 256-7. In the following year he reports that out of over four hundred children attending eight feeding centres, only ten cases of markedly bad nourishment were recorded. (Ibid. for 1912, p. 31.)

    508.The Health and Physique of School Children, by Arthur Greenwood, 1913, pp. 65, 66. "It may perhaps be urged," he continues, "that this progress is purely accidental; but a close examination of a large number of school medical officers' reports does not show any general increase during the few years for which records are available. There are variations from year to year, of course, but no apparent regular improvement, except in isolated instances, of which Bradford is one." (Ibid., p. 65.)

    509.Annual Report of the London County Council for 1910, Chapter XLI., p. 8.

    510.Ibid., pp. 8, 9.

    511.Ibid., p. 9.

    512.Report of School Medical Officer for Bootle for 1912, p. 56; Ibid. for Worcester for 1911, p. 14.

    513.As we have seen, this result was noticed during the feeding experiment at Lambeth (see ante, p. 188.)

    514.At Bootle, on the other hand, where "it was anticipated that the movement would have a beneficial effect upon the regularity of the attendance ... there is no evidence to show that such has been the case, and it is very doubtful whether the attendance has been appreciably affected." (Report of the Bootle School Canteen Committee for 1910-11, p. 8.)

    515.Report of School Medical Officer for Leeds for 1910, p. 41. The chairman of the Leeds Education Committee, in giving evidence before the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws, stated, "the supply of three good meals a day has been of great benefit to the children in attendance, who compare favourably with the children attending the ordinary public elementary schools.... They take a good position in school competitions for swimming, etc., and are particularly smart in school drills and exercises." (Report of the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws, 1909, Vol. IV. of Evidence, Appendix LXXXII. (12).)

    516.Hull Education Committee, Appendix to Minutes of the Provision of Meals Sub-Committee, October 20, 1911.

    517.Report of Bradford Education Committee for the 16 months ended July 31, 1912, p. 10.

    518.Annual Report of the London County Council for 1910, Chapter XLI., p. 9.

    519.Ibid.

    520.Ibid.

    521.Annual Report of the London County Council for 1910, Vol. III., p. 129.

    522.Report of Darlington Education Committee, 1908-10, p. xii.

    523.Child Life and Labour, by Margaret Alden, M.D., 1908, p. 108.

    524.Thus, to quote one of many instances, at Bradford, when porridge breakfasts were given in the experiment of 1907, it was found that the first morning thirteen refused to eat it; the next morning only two refused, and after that all ate and enjoyed it. (Bradford Education Committee, Report on a Course of Meals given to Necessitous Children from April to July, 1907, p. 4.)

    525.Report of the Special Committee of the London School Board on Underfed Children, 1895, Appendix I., p. 7.

    526.Report of the General Purposes Committee of the London School Board on Underfed Children, 1899, Appendix I., p. 12.

    527.A Health Centre and Dental Clinic in a Rural District, Newport, Essex, 1911, p. 6.

    528."Charity and Food," report of a Special Committee of the Charity Organisation Society, 1887, p. 16. For later expressions of the same line of criticism, see, for instance, "The Relief of School Children," by M. Clutton and E. Neville (C.O.S. Occasional Paper), March, 1901, pp. 4, 6; "Underfed School Children," by Arthur Clay (C.O.S. Occasional Paper), May, 1905, p. 3; "The Feeding of School Children," by Miss McKnight, in Charity Organisation Review, July, 1906, p. 37; "A New Poor Law for Children," by Rev. H. Iselin, in Charity Organisation Review, March, 1909, p. 170.

    529."Working-Class Households in Reading," by Professor A. L. Bowley, in The Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, June, 1913, p. 686. The minimum standard for food was computed by Mr. Rowntree, in 1901, as 3s. for an adult, and 2s. 3d. for a child. This standard has been raised by Professor Bowley to 3s. 6d. and 2s. 7d. respectively, since prices in Reading in 1912 were about sixteen per cent. higher than at York in 1901. The diet on which Mr. Rowntree based his computations was mainly vegetarian, and his minimum standard assumed a knowledge of food values and perfectly scientific expenditure. (Ibid., p. 684.) Taking a slightly different standard, Professor Bowley computes that "more than half the working-class children of Reading, during some part of their first fourteen years, live in households where the standard of life in question is not attained." (Ibid., p. 692.)

    530.Ibid., p. 693.

    531.The figures for Birmingham are taken from The Public Feeding of Elementary School Children, by Phyllis D. Winder, 1913, pp. 47-55; those for St. George's-in-the-East, from "The Story of a Children's Care Committee," by Rev. H. Iselin, in Economic Review, January, 1912, p. 47; those for Stoke, Bradford, St. Pancras and Bermondsey from case papers that we have analysed. These figures must not be taken as more than a somewhat rough indication of the state of affairs, for it is not always easy to determine precisely into which category a particular case should be put. Probably the proportion of casually employed is somewhat understated; of the twenty-six, for instance, who are classed as unemployed at Birmingham, roughly one-third belonged to the class of permanent casuals, but were totally unemployed at the date of the enquiry. (The Public Feeding of Elementary School Children, p. 48.)

    532.We may note that there are very few cases where the fathers of the children who are receiving school meals are, at the time, in regular work. (See table on page 211.) Many authorities refuse to consider such cases, while, where they are not necessarily barred, they amount as a rule, so far as we have found, except at Bradford, to a very small proportion of the total number of cases dealt with. In London a few committees have several such cases on their feeding-lists—a member of one committee, indeed, informed us that the fact that a man had a large family and low wages was, till recently, taken as a reason for granting meals to his children—but the great majority of committees either refuse to feed such children at all, or only do so in infrequent and exceptional circumstances. One or two instances were quoted to us where, as it was alleged, the provision of meals for the children had induced the father to acquiesce in the acceptance of a low wage without demanding an increase or seeking more remunerative employment. Thus we were told of a man who was formerly in charge of two furnaces at a wage of 24s. a week; one furnace was shut down, and he was offered the charge of the remaining one at 15s. This he accepted and the Care Committee had been feeding his children for a whole year. In another case, a man who was out of work, and was having all his children fed at school, took a job at 15s. a week, a wage which, it was asserted, he would not otherwise have agreed to. But in such instances, infrequent and isolated as they are in any case, it is often found on analysis that the father, through some physical or mental infirmity, is incapable of performing a man's work, and unable, therefore, to earn more wages.

    533.At Bradford a few years ago an enquiry was made with the object of discovering how far parents were obtaining the meals under false pretences. Two criteria were taken, firstly, whether the parents' statements as to the income earned were corroborated by their employers; secondly, how far the parents voluntarily withdrew their children from the school meals when their circumstances improved. As a result of this enquiry it appeared that not more than 2-1/2 per cent. were unduly taking advantage of the meals. In many cases, where the parents' statements as to income did not tally with the employers' statements, it was found that the parents, in giving their average earnings, had overstated instead of understating them.

    534.Report of Chief Medical Officer of the Board of Education for 1910, p. 1.

    535.Report of Select Committee on Education (Provision of Meals) Bills (England and Scotland), 1906, Qs. 2290, 2312. (The italics are mine.)

    536.See post, p. 222.

    537.Report of School Medical Officer for Leicester for 1912, p. 34.

    538."A New Poor Law for Children," by Rev. Henry Iselin, in Charity Organisation Review, March, 1909, p. 170.

    539.Report of Proceedings of University Extension Oxford Summer Meeting, 1913, p. 17.

    540.See ante, pp. 120, 123-5, 155-6.

    541.In the ordinary elementary schools in some of the Scottish towns, large numbers of children pay for the dinners. (See Appendix II., pp. 242, 245, 246.)

    542.The cost depends, of course, on the kind of food provided. At Bradford, where a two-course dinner is given, the total cost per meal, for administrative charges (the upkeep of the Cooking Depot, the rent of the dining-rooms, the wages of the staff, payment for supervision, the carriage of the food, sinking fund, etc.), amounted in 1912-13 to 1·2d., and for food to 1·26d., making a total of 2·46d. About one-third of the meals supplied were breakfasts, which are usually rather cheaper than dinners, so that the cost per dinner would be slightly more. (Bradford Education Committee, Return as to the Working of the Education (Provision of Meals) Act for the year ending March 31, 1913). At Edinburgh, where a one-course dinner is given, the cost is ·9d. for food and 1d. for administrative charges. (Report of the Edinburgh School Board for 1912-13, p. 35.)

    543.We must add one other item of expenditure, which will be necessary whatever course be adopted with regard to the provision of meals, namely, the appointment of salaried organisers for each group of schools, to supervise the work of medical treatment, after-care, and all other activities directed to the physical well-being of the child.

    544.Report of Proceedings of University Extension Oxford Summer Meeting, 1913, p. 17.

    545.There appears to be no fixed dietary, the dinners being varied each week.

    546.See ante, p. 48.

    547.8 Edward VII., c. 63, sec. 3 (2).

    548.Ibid., sec. 6 (1).

    549.Ibid., sec. 6 (2).

    550.Ibid.

    551.During the coal strike in the spring of 1912, some Boards in the Fife district took action under section 6 and provided free meals. (Report of the Chief Inspector for the Southern Division for 1912, p. 11.)

    552.Report of the Committee of Council on Education in Scotland, 1912-13, p. 4.

    553.For the following account I am mainly indebted to the kindness of Mrs. Leslie Mackenzie and Mr. I. H. Cunningham.

    554.Report of Select Committee on Education (Provision of Meals) Bills (England and Scotland), 1906, Q. 4211; Report of Royal Commission on Physical Training (Scotland) 1903, Vol. II., Q. 2396.

    555.Report of Special Sub-Committee on Meals for School Children, in Minutes of London School Board, July 25, 1889, Vol. 31, p. 382.

    556.Edinburgh School Board, Memorandum on the Feeding of School Children, 1910, pp. 5-6.

    557.Two special officers have been appointed to make enquiries.

    558.There is no fixed scale in determining which children are necessitous, but free meals are usually granted if the gross income of the household is less than 3s. a head.

    559.For the week ending December 19, 1913, the number of children fed was:—

    Necessitous 442
    Paying children 1,389
    Parish Council children 207

    560.Evidence before the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws, 1909, Vol. VI., Qs. 61553-5.

    561.Ibid., Q. 61371 (12).

    562.Ibid., Q. 55247 (31).

    563.Report of the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws, 1909, 8vo edition, Vol. III., p. 148.

    564."Administrative problems arising out of Child Feeding," by J. A. Young, in Proceedings of the National Conference on the Prevention of Destitution, 1911, pp. 339-340.

    565.Report of Select Committee on Education (Provision of Meals) Bills (England and Scotland), 1906, Qs. 3075-8.

    566.Evidence before the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws, 1909, Vol. VI., Q. 59728 (18); Report of London School Board on Underfed Children attending School, 1899, p. 253.

    567.See Dundee School Board, Report on the Feeding of School Children, 1913, p. 31.

    568.Report of Glasgow School Board for 1911-12, p. 13.

    569.Report of Chief Inspector for Southern Division for 1912, pp. 11-12.

    570.Perth School Board, Officers' Report on the supplying of Meals and Boots to School Children, 1912-13, pp. 1-3.

    571.Report of Chief Inspector for Southern Division for 1912, p. 12.

    572.Perth School Board, Officers' Report, 1912-13, p. 4.

    573.Dundee School Board, Report on the Feeding of School Children, 1913, p. 11.

    574.Ibid., p. 15.

    575.Ibid., pp. 13-14.

    576.In the special schools for defective children at Paisley a two-course dinner is provided at a charge of 8d. a week.

    577.Report of Chief Inspector for the Northern Division for 1911, p. 24.

    578."Can a sufficient mid-day meal be given to poor school children ... for ... less than one penny?" by Sir Henry Peek, 1883, p. 13.

    579.Report of Chief Inspector for the Southern Division for 1911, p. 27.

    580.Ibid., pp. 27-8.

    581.First Report on Medical Inspection of School Children in Scotland, by Dr. Leslie Mackenzie, 1913, p. 51.

    582."The Diet of Country Elementary School Children," by Dr. Gordon A. Lang, in Rearing an Imperial Race, edited by C. E. Hecht, 1913, p. 116.

    583.Report of Chief Inspector for Northern Division for 1906.

    584."The Free Feeding of School Children," a reprint of the reports by the Special Sanitary Commissioner of the Lancet, 2nd edition, 1907, p. 7.

    585.Ibid., p. 8.

    586.Ibid., p. 9.

    587."The Cantines Scolaires of Paris," by Sir Charles A. Elliott, in the Nineteenth Century, May, 1906, pp. 834-5.

    588."Organisation des Cantines Scolaires À Paris," a manifold manuscript report issued by the Direction de l'Enseignement primaire, 3me bureau, 1912.

    589."The Cantines Scolaires of Paris," by Sir Charles Elliott, in the Nineteenth Century, May, 1906, pp. 835-6.

    590.According to the latest figures 70 per cent. of the children for whom meals are provided receive them free.

    591."Organisation des Cantines Scolaires À Paris," report by Direction de l'Enseignement primaire, 3me bureau, 1912.

    592.Ibid.

    593.Ibid.

    594."Caisse des Écoles du 18e arrondissement," Exercice de l'annÉe 1911, p. 34.

    595.Proposition tendant À l'ouverture d'un crÉdit de 10,000 francs en vue de permettre À la Caisse des Ecoles du XVIIe arrondissement d'organiser, À titre d'essai, une classe de garde prolongÉe jusqu'À huit heures et une cantine du soir, dÉposÉe par M. FrÉdÉric Brunet, conseiller municipal, Septembre 19, 1912.

    596."Organisation des Cantines Scolaires À Paris," report issued by Direction de l'Enseignement primaire, 3me bureau, 1912; "Necessitous Children in Paris and London," by George Rainey, in School Hygiene, November, 1912, Vol. III., p. 198.

    597.Ibid., p. 198.

    598.Ibid., pp. 198, 200.

    599.For the above description, see, besides the references already quoted, Report of London School Board on Underfed Children attending School, 1899, Appendix IX., pp. 262-5; "The Cantines Scolaires of Paris," by Marcel Kleine, in Report of Proceedings of the International Congress for the Welfare and Protection of Children, 1906, pp. 65-82; "Feeding School Children: The Experience of France," in the Manchester Guardian, February 22, 1906; "Children's Care Committees in Paris," in the Morning Post, March 19, 1909; "School Canteens in Paris," by Miss M. M. Boldero, in the School Child, July, 1910; School Feeding, its History and Practice at Home and Abroad, by Louise Stevens Bryant, 1913, pp. 77-93; Conseil Municipal de Paris, ProcÈs Verbal, June 25, 1909, December 31, 1909, March 23, 1910.

    600.School Feeding, by Louise S. Bryant, 1913, pp. 93-94.

    601.London School Board, Report on Underfed Children attending School, 1899, p. 265.

    602.Lancet Reports, 1907, pp. 50-56.

    603.Ibid., pp. 41-43.

    604.School Feeding by Louise S. Bryant, 1913, pp. 80, 94-97.

    605.Report of London School Board on Underfed Children attending School, 1899, pp. 271-2.

    606.The Bitter Cry of the Children, by John Spargo, 1906, p. 277.

    607.School Feeding, by Louise S. Bryant, 1913, p. 133.

    608.Report of London School Board on Underfed Children attending School, 1899, p. 267.

    609.Lancet Reports, 1907, pp. 31, 33.

    610.Minutes of London School Board, May 26, 1898, Vol. 48, p. 1810.

    611.Lancet Reports, 1907, p. 20.

    612.[Footnote 5: For the following account, see Lancet Reports, pp. 24-30. It is interesting to note that this scheme for making universal provision was introduced by the Conservative party.]

    613.School Feeding, by Louise S. Bryant, 1913, p. 141; Il Patronato Scolastico Umberto 1° in Vercelli e la sua Opera al 31 Dicembre, 1912, pp. 5, 6.

    614.[Footnote 2: Ibid., p. 140.]

    615."Prize Essays on Feeding School Children," 1890, pp. 65, 212-4.

    616.Ibid., p. 65.

    617.School Feeding, by Louise S. Bryant, 1913, pp. 17-18, 104.

    618.Ibid., pp. 18, 105.

    619.Ibid., pp. 99, 106.

    620.Ibid., pp. 114-5.

    621."Prize Essays on Feeding School Children," 1890, pp. 66-70, 181-7, 197-8.

    622.Ibid., pp. 138, 198.

    623.London School Board, Report on Underfed Children attending School, 1899, pp. 258, 260-261.

    624.Feeding of School Children in Continental and American Cities, 1906, p. 6.

    625.School Feeding, by Louise S. Bryant, 1913, p. 143.

    626.London School Board, Report on Underfed Children attending School, 1899, p. 256.

    627.Ibid., p. 255; Board of Education, Reports on Educational Subjects, Vol. II., 1898, p. 682.

    628.London School Board, Report on Underfed Children attending School, 1899, p. 256.

    629.Lancet Reports, 1907, pp. 14-15.

    630.Feeding of School Children in Continental and American Cities, 1906, p. 2; London School Board, Report on Underfed Children attending School, 1899, pp. 259, 260-1.

    631."Prize Essays on Feeding School Children," 1890, pp. 204-5.

    632.Feeding of School Children in Continental and American Cities, 1906, pp. 2, 4, 6.

    633.School Feeding, by Louise S. Bryant, 1913, p. 130.

    634.School Feeding, by Louise S. Bryant, 1913, p. 146.

    635.The Feeding of School Children in Continental and American Cities, 1906, pp. 3, 5, 7.

    636.London School Board, Report on Underfed Children attending School, 1899, p. 268; School Feeding, by Louise S. Bryant, 1913, p. 145.

    637.The Bitter Cry of the Children, by John Spargo, 1906, pp. 114-115, 275.

    638.Ibid., p. 276.

    639.School Feeding, by Louise S. Bryant, 1913, pp. 143-4.

    640."Prize Essays on Feeding School Children," 1890, pp. 71-75.

    641.London School Board, Report on Underfed Children attending School, 1899, pp. 270-271.

    642.Ibid., p. 270.

    643.Ibid., p. 269.

    644.See for a full description of the provision made in America, School Feeding, by Louise S. Bryant, 1913.

    645."Prize Essays on Feeding School Children," 1890, pp. 225-35.

    646.Poverty, by Robert Hunter, 1904, p. 216.

    647.School Feeding, by Louise S. Bryant, 1913, pp. 147-50.

    648.Ibid., pp. 151-164.

    649.Ibid., pp. 164-8.

    650.Ibid., p. 19.

    651.Ibid., pp. 20, 182-3.

    Transcriber's Note:

    Missing or obscured punctuation was corrected.

    Typographical errors were silently corrected.

    Spelling and hyphenation were made consistent when a predominant form was found in this book; otherwise it was not changed.

    One unpaired double quotation mark could not be corrected with confidence.

    One unpaired curved bracket could not be corrected with confidence.

    Tables have been reformatted to a manageable width where necessary.


    *******

    This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
    /5/7/3/1/57313

    Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will be renamed.

    1.F.

    1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

    1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

    1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

    The Foundation's principal office is in Fairbanks, Alaska, with the mailing address: PO Box 750175, Fairbanks, AK 99775, but its volunteers and employees are scattered throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

    For additional contact information:

    The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

    While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.

    International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

    Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: www.gutenberg.org

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

    Clyx.com


    Top of Page
    Top of Page