It must be borne in mind that in this chapter we have to consider only those families of the nation which were in possession of real or artificial When, however, we are through with the statistics, we may make references to and may even make special statements about the tenant families treated before; while the prominent position will now be given to the mortgagor families, showing how they fall from the class of property owners, become debtors to the owners of greater wealth, lose their properties and increase the numbers of the propertyless. It is important to note here that the loss of the rights to property always precedes the actual loss The very day in which a propertied person mortgages his property he loses his rights for the wealth he has owned, because his property goes from him as a security "LOSS OF RIGHTS PRECEDES LOSS OF PROPERTY." for the loan he makes. And while losing the rights, he takes upon himself the obligation to divide the results of his labor between the lender and himself, and thus falls under the influence of dividogenesure. For, henceforth, he spends his active energy in favor of the creditor and himself, and is obliged to regard the interests of the creditor as of more importance than his own. The rate of interest to the creditor must be accurately paid so much per cent per annum for the loan. Hence, the mortgagor at once appears in the position of a tenant of farm or of any other property. And it depends on the rate of the percentage he agreed to pay out of the results of his labor whether he is better off or worse even than a mere tenant. It also depends on the fact whether his mortgaged property is a large one or small, and whether he has mortgaged one part or the whole of his resources of wealth. In any way, a mortgagor, according to the degree of his indebtedness, is an economic slave of the owners of greater But let us now see the statistical facts and then we may better judge of what mortgages signify and what they mean to the nation. We shall take the other class treated in the same bulletin out of which we extracted the 6,624,259 tenant families for the preceding chapter. STATISTICS. |
The Farm-Families. | Per Cent. | Number of |
---|---|---|
The total of families occupying farms | 4,767,179 | |
(1) out of them: The families hiring farms | 34.08 | 1,624,765 |
(2) and the families owning farms | 65.92 | 3,142,414 |
Out of the last 65.92 per cent. of them are those owning farms with encumbrance | 28.22 | 886,839 |
And those owning them free of encumbrance | 71.78 | 2,255,575 |
The Home-Families. | ||
The total of families occupying homes | 7,922,973 | |
(1) out of them: The families hiring homes | 63.10 | 4,999,396 |
(2) and the families owning homes | 36.90 | 2,923,577 |
Out of the last 36.90 per cent. of them are those owning homes with encumbrance | 27.70 | 809,831 |
And those owning them free of encumbrance | 72.30 | 2,113,746 |
Total of farm and home families with encumbrance | 1,696,670 |
Besides, the necessary life-expenses of every one, subject to a strong dividogenesure,
But what is inconceivably strange is that this extremely abnormal situation should be produced in a nation governed by the people’s representatives chosen by their good will and purpose; and that this will and purpose should bring about the results of so great injustice and wickedness against this people, is only possible on the basis of ignorance, neglect of duty and selfishness.
Let us now have an idea of the progress of development
“Extra Census Bulletin No. 71 gives the statistics on mortgages by amounts, length of mortgage, rate of interest for the United States from 1880 to 1889.”
It says: “That during that time 9,517,747 real estate mortgages, stating amount of debt incurred, were made in the United States, representing "INCREASE OF MORTGAGES." an incurred indebtedness of $12,094,877,793. The number of mortgages made during one year
“With regard to mortgages on acre-tracts, the number made during 10 years was 4,747,078, representing an incurred indebtedness "ACRE-TRACTS." of $4,896,771,112.” The increase in making them was as follows: “The number of these mortgages made in” the year
“The increase was relatively larger in the case of mortgages on lots. They numbered 4,770,669 during the 10 years, and the indebtedness "ON LOTS." incurred under them amounted to $7,198,106,681. From 1880 to 1889 the annual number made increased from 272,159 to 701,229, an increase of 157.65 per cent. During the same time the amount of annual indebtedness incurred increased from $368,322,027” in the year 1880, “to $1,166,838,555” in the year 1889, “an increase of 216.80 per cent.”
As you see, the yearly increase in the numbers of making new mortgages was astonishingly great on all sides. This progress of falling under the influence of dividogenesure, falling into debt, indicates that the people could not avoid becoming slaves to the percentages for loans. This progress indicates that they were compelled by the generally abnormal conditions of existence to take the risk of losing their properties. And all cities thus grow as “New York City,” where “but 6? per cent of the families owned their homes”
“AMOUNTS:”
“During the decade 622,855,091 acres were covered by 4,758,268 mortgages stating and not stating the amount of indebtedness incurred under them. The number of acres covered by mortgage in 1880 was 42,743,013; in 1889, 70,678,257; an increase of 65.36 per cent. In the case of lots covered by mortgage the increase was 198.25 per cent. The number” thus “covered by mortgages stating and not stating amount of indebtedness in the former year being 429,955; in the latter year 1,282,334.
“At the end of the decade, January 1, 1890, the "ON ACRES AND LOTS." real estate mortgage indebtedness amounted to $6,010,670,985,” on the whole, “represented by 4,777,698 mortgages,”
It was also computed that the average length of a mortgage in the United States is longer than four and a half years, or exactly "LIFE OF MORTGAGE." “4.660 years.” The Bulletin calls it a “life of a mortgage,” which may last “as much longer without being paid off;” that is, a mortgage may last as long as the creditor gets his rate of interest, or as long as his increasing
But what is specially important for us is whether the mortgagors are able to extinguish their debt with the same rapidity with which it was incurred by them? If they are able to pay off their debts at the proper times, then mortgaging of property would at least appear uninjurious to their well being, though it could not be regarded as profitable to them.
The same “Bulletin No. 71,” however, states that, “since mortgages in force were made, 12.68 per "ORIGINAL DEBT PAID: 12.68 PER CENT." cent of the original amount of indebtedness incurred under them has been extinguished by partial payments.” Now, it was time to extinguish all the original amount on mortgages in force. Yet 87.32 per cent of the original indebtedness could not be paid off by the debtors. And this is a sign of the "ORIGINAL LOSS OF PROPERTY: 87.32 PER CENT." most forcible argument, showing that the greatest majority of the mortgagors have been on the way to ruin, and on the way of losing their properties. It is thus the millions of tenants appeared in 1890.
THE PER CAPITA DEBT.
Instead of being paid off at proper times, the mortgage debt was accumulating so far that if it
“In 41 States 28.86 per cent of the taxed acres are covered by mortgages in force. The largest proportion of mortgaged acres is in Kansas, where 60.32 per cent of the total number of taxed acres are mortgaged. Nebraska stands next, with 54.73 per cent; South Dakota third, with 51.76 per cent.[99]
“In the five States, Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and South Carolina, 23.99 per cent of the taxed lots are covered by mortgages in force,”[99] and so on in the other States. But the most important fact is the annual interest the people have to pay to the wealthy few for their loans.
AVERAGE RATE PER CENT ON THE
DEBT.
“The average rate for all mortgages in the United States is 6.60 per cent. For mortgages on
Now we have reached the principle point in these statistics. Imagine that the families in debt are annually charged with the rate of interest amounting to $397,442,792 "INTEREST CHARGE." worth of the results of their labor, and that the group of creditors get this amount of wealth yearly without work. And think that, if the average life of a mortgage is even 4½ years long, these families have to pay $1,788,492,564 worth of wealth produced by their energy during this time. But we were told that the average length of a mortgage life continues “as much longer without being paid off,” that is, it lasts nearly 10 years, and these families have, therefore, to pay nearly $4,000,000,000 worth of the wealth produced by them during this time. That is how the debtors are affected by the principle of dividogenesure which steadily works in all directions in favor of the wealthy few. This is the economic slavery that the Nineteenth Century has established for the people of the United States.
The Bulletin shows that this interest charge is
But the Extra Bulletin No. 98 shows that the indebtedness on owned farms was equal to $1,085,995,960,
It is certainly not the yearly charge of the memorial past, but it was stated as existing in the year 1890, and would naturally continue as an annual interest charge up to the present day. The debtors must use an extraordinary effort in their toil, in order to get sufficient results from their applied energy for clearing up this annual interest charge, and keeping themselves alive.
Yes, every one that speaks about prosperity in the United States knows what he means. For the statistical facts prove that there is an unusual prosperity
These tens of millions of individuals become weaker and weaker consumers of their own products and products of the nation. So that, the few prosperous families are obliged to look after wider foreign markets to export to the produce that the millions here have no means, no purchasing power to acquire. It has long been the case in England, where millions of the people wear overcoats, for instance, from 5 to 10 years each, without being able to procure new ones; while the exports of all goods are ever going on to the different foreign markets. And the United States are growing similar to Great Britain in almost every respect. * * *
“The percentages representing encumbrance for various rates of interest,” says the Extra Bulletin "RATES OF INTEREST ARE HIGHER ON THE POOR." No. 71, “show that the larger encumbrances bear the lower rates of interest, as a general fact.” And the differences in the rates of interest are from “less than 6 to greater than 12 per cent.” Hence, the poorer the mortgagors, the greater the weight of oppression they bear; and the greater oppression they bear, the quicker they lose their properties,
The brute-minded creditors think that it is natural to skin the helpless, because they have no great security for the loans.
What is the significance of mortgages for the nation? And what do other men acquainted with mortgages think of them?
The significance of mortgages has already been considered by many thoughtful men, and it is not out of place to quote here the ready views of some of them.
SIGNIFICANCE.
As there are two economic classes of the people in the United States,
And then because “on the first of January, 1890, the amount of these mortgages remaining unpaid in the whole United States was $6,019,679,985,
And being uncertain about mortgages on acres and lots at the beginning of the last decade, he infers that “the least estimate of the sum due on acres and lots at the beginning of this period (1880-90) would be $1,500,000,000.” And continues that “these original mortgages executed prior to 1880 must have been wholly liquidated, mostly by payment.” * * *
As regards this point we have equal or even greater reason to say that those mortgages have
But the chief feature of the situation Mr. Atkinson wishes to vindicate is that the mortgage growth indicates prosperity and not the system of tenancy and landlordism as in Great Britain. He says:
“The evidence is conclusive that the increase of hired farms does not imply the permanent establishment "AFRAID OF PRIMOGENITURE." of the relations of landlord and tenant after the English fashion. It does not imply the concentration of land in fewer hands, but rather the reverse. It does imply better and more intelligent methods of agriculture, larger and more varied crops produced from lessening areas of land throughout the whole great grain-growing section,”
As to the prosperity, I will say, that a family securing a large amount of borrowed money or capital at low rates of interest may "CONDITIONS OF PROSPERITY." prosper under mortgage by efficiently applying the capital on its wealth, by efficiently applying the labor energy of the family members, and, especially, by efficiently applying hired labor upon its farm or any other kind of property. So that, only those mortgagor families can have prosperity, which are aided by many
As to the argument that we have no establishment of tenancy after the English fashion of primogeniture, it is enough to refer the reader to the third chapter of this work, and beg him to understand it well by reading a second time. For the effects of primogeniture and dividogenesure are the same, as both principles demand that millions of individuals should divide the sole results of their applied energy with the few owners of capital and wealth, or else these millions must starve without employment. They produce economic slavery in England and in the United States, where most of the people are now propertyless and therefore helpless.
Dividogenesure, however, differs from primogeniture by including all mortgagors into its sphere of oppression.
And it seems to me perfectly naive to assert that “larger and more varied crops are produced from lessening areas of land throughout "LOGIC QUEER." the whole grain-growing section” of the country. For it really means that the more land the people lose through mortgages, the better crops they will produce, and hence the best crops must be produced by them when they lose all the land they formerly owned.
Mr. G. H. Holmes, writing in the “Annals of the American Academy and Social Science Quarterly,” gives a more balanced view on the subject. He says:
“While mortgage debtors must admit that they have done better to obtain real estate on credit "PINCHING EFFECTS." than not to obtain as much of it as they have done, or not to obtain it at all, they are nevertheless in a situation where they feel the pinching effects of a reduction or loss of income more than real-estate owners
While a still better view is given by Rev. Wm. Bliss, editor of the Encyclopedia of Social Reform.
“The mortgage indicates a hope of progress, but also a slavery to interest under which many sink.”
It is exactly the point of reality, for many propertied families borrow money with the hope of getting economically better off, but the "DECEITFUL HOPES OF VERY MANY." hopes mostly deceive them, and they find themselves in the trap of slavery on account of paying too high rate of interest for the loans they obtain. And it is this slavery to interest that makes them absolutely propertyless, slaves to dividogenesure.
And it follows that the claim of Mr. Atkinson, that mortgages are profitable to both the mortgagor and the mortgagee is only true in the cases of paying the rates of interest not exceeding 3 per cent per annum, which, however, does not exist in America. And if this rate had been in existence, then, an effective application of all possible agencies of production could make the mortgages profitable to the mortgagors and the mortgagees. While under the present conditions they are only ruinous to the former and most profitable to the latter.
“The view that America is becoming a nation "SEMI-PESSIMISTIC VIEWS." of tenants is well known,” says Mr. J. P. Dunn, Jr., writing in the Political Science Quarterly for March, 1890, after describing the situation as regards the Western States.
“BURDEN OF DEBT.”
“The mortgage indebtedness of the Western States is a matter worthy the attention of economists "MOUNTAINOUS AND IMMOVABLE." and statesmen, as well as of the people of those States. Whatever may be thought of its effects, it is a fact—mountainous and immovable. And more, the probabilities that loom far above the figures here presented make it very questionable whether the alarmists who have discussed the subject have in fact materially exaggerated the existing conditions. * * *
“If the people of the Western States may be considered thrifty and judicious, the people of Michigan may, and by the official records their condition
Here you are. Mr. Dunn’s view is not an argument based upon an inference from a guess, but on immovable facts of evidence which testify that the State of Michigan "LOSSES IN ADDITION TO LOSSES." alone assists the prosperity of the few wealthy families by the yearly contributions of $9,451,851 worth of wealth produced by the labor energy of its debtors. And that in addition to this contribution, the same debtors make a net loss of
But do not flatter yourself by thinking that this is only the fate of Michigan. No, the people’s economic conditions are more or less similar in all the States and Territories, and some States are much worse off than Michigan, as the statistics show their situation.
Mr. D. R. Goodloe, in the “Forum” for November, 1890 (not knowing yet the facts of the East), says:
“The conclusion from this melancholy array of facts is irresistible. The virgin soil of the West is rapidly ceasing to be the home and "A CURSE OF HUMANITY." the possession of the sturdy American freeman. He is but a tenant at will, or a dependent upon the tender mercies of soulless corporations and of absentee landlords. We have abolished monarchy, and primogeniture, and church establishments supported by the State, yet the universal curse of humanity, the monopoly of the earth by the wealthy few, remains.” * * *
And I can tell Mr. Goodloe that these few have