Effect of Dockisation on the River. Rail and Road Communication at Gravesend. National and Military Aspect of the Scheme. The Depletion of the Thames Basin. The Port of London Bill, 1903. Objections against Dockisation. Title: The Great Thames Barrage Author: Thomas Walter Barber Language: English Character set encoding: UTF-8 E-text prepared by deaurider |
Note: | Images of the original pages are available through Internet Archive. See https://archive.org/details/b22415737 |
Some characters might not display in this html version (e.g., empty squares). If so, the reader should consult the original page images noted above. |
“Public Works,” | CONDUCTED | “The Surveyor and Municipal and County Engineer.” |
A high-class magazine dealing with Governmental and Municipal enterprises in all parts of the world. Published on the 15th of each month.
SUBSCRIPTION.
PUBLIC WORKS will be sent direct by the Publishers on the following terms:—
For the United Kingdom and Ireland, | 16/- per annum | } | Post free, including special issues. |
Abroad | 18/- ” ” | } |
Subscriptions are payable in advance, and should be made payable to The St. Bride’s Press, Ltd., and crossed “National Provincial Bank of England, Ltd.” They should be forwarded to the St. Bride’s Press, Ltd., 24 Bride Lane, Fleet Street, London, E.C.
Code A.B.C. Telegrams: “Municipium, London.” Telephone: 1359 Holborn. | Vol. 1 (first four numbers), with 376 pages and 491 Illustrations, bound in Ornamental Cloth-Gilt Cover, 5s., post free, 5s. 6d. |
☞ SEE BACK OF COVER.
Transcriber’s Note: Images with a blue border may be clicked to see a larger version, if the device you’re reading this on supports that.
Mr. T. W. Barber, M.Inst.C.E., and Mr. Jas. Casey, M.I.N.A., have suggested that the difficulties of which the shipping interests complain might be met by the construction of a barrage across the river from Gravesend to Tilbury, a comparatively simple engineering feat after the great Nile dam (about 1¼ miles in length), especially as the bed of the stream is here firm chalk. This would, it is claimed, give a navigable depth of water, varying from 65ft. at Gravesend to 32ft. at London Bridge, without dredging, or any interference with the river bottom or banks. Some of the advantages which would, the advocates of the scheme claim, be secured are as follows:—Ships drawing 30ft. could proceed to London Bridge at any hour of the day or night, without waiting for tides; ships of all tonnages and draughts could traverse the river, anchor anywhere, lie alongside any wharf or quay, always remain at one level for loading or unloading, and need not lie out in the river or obstruct the free navigation; dock entrances could be left open, thus saving the cost and time lost in working them—the London and India Docks Company estimates the cost of working their entrances at £50,000 per annum; while greatly increased safety of navigation would result, there being no possibility of grounding, swinging with the tides, or collisions due to tidal drift. In addition to these, London would be provided free with a lake of fresh water forty-five miles long, and from a quarter to a half-mile wide. In short, we should have a vast inland lake from Gravesend to Richmond.
THE GREAT THAMES BARRAGE
BY
T. W. BARBER
M.INST.C.E.
It is not necessary to emphasise in any way the fact that something must be done in the tidal Thames to bring the Port of London up to date, and to maintain it as the great inlet of British commerce. What with numerous newspaper articles, magazine reviews, reports of Royal Commissions and others, and a general murmur of complaint from all persons who use the port for their business or the river for traffic purposes, there have recently been abundant evidences that things are not as they should be. Everyone is agreed on this point, but when it comes to the question of a remedy, there agreement ends and confusion begins.