Original Communications.

Previous

I have long formed the opinion that the prevailing method of determining the value of any particular medicine or mode of treatment is essentially faulty. Practitioners, after watching a few cases, form a favourable opinion of this or that mode of procedure; they then publish their views, supporting them with their successful cases, and strongly recommend them to the consideration of their medical brethren. Then follow trials more or less numerous by others, some of whom think the method recommended good, whilst others find it useless or injurious. Such a system is characteristic of an imperfect acquaintance with medicine, and during the progress of many centuries, while it has led to some valuable knowledge, has for the most part only tended to superficiality and the utmost contrariety in medical practice. What seems to be necessary at present for determining the real value of any kind of treatment is—

1st. Rigid accuracy in the diagnosis of the case.

2d. A clear comprehension of the nature of the pathological condition treated.

3d. An acquaintance with the natural progress of the disease.

And

4th. A tabulated account of the cases treated, showing the care with which they were observed, and their chief symptoms, including the time they were under treatment, and the termination in success or failure.

Doubtless this method of determining the value of any treatment requires a high degree of medical knowledge, and some trouble; but I would suggest that it is the only one capable of inspiring confidence and permanently advancing the interests of the medical art. If it cannot be carried out during the exigencies of every-day practice, there is nothing to prevent its prosecution in our public hospitals, where the patients are under constant observation, and where there are in many of them a staff of assistants whose business it is to make the necessary records.

The chief obstacle to obtaining accuracy in result is the general conviction among medical practitioners that a different treatment is required, even in fixed morbid conditions, according to the symptoms which may be present. The progress of diseases is never absolutely uniform, and no doubt the occurrence of particular phenomena often require special interference. This secondary treatment of symptoms, however, should never be allowed to interfere with the primary management of the morbid condition; and it is the neglect of this rule which has led to such injurious results in the treatment of many diseases. If, for example, in order to relieve cough in phthisis we give opiates and expectorants, how can we maintain the appetite and improve the tone and digestibility of the stomach, on which the assimilation of food, cod-liver oil, and nutrition essentially depend?

Since the publication of my papers and treatise on the Restorative Treatment of Pneumonia I have watched with great interest what has been published by the profession on this subject. The only published series of cases that I am acquainted with is given by Dr. T. N. Borland, of the Boston City Hospital, U.S. He tabulates according to the form I recommended 90 cases of pneumonia, of which he says twelve died—a mortality of one in 7½ cases.[1] Of these, four had phthisis; two were chronic, having been admitted on the eighteenth and twenty-first days of the disease; one was utterly prostrated on admission, and died the following day; one was a case of surgical injury, transferred to the medical wards on the occurrence of fatal pneumonia; and one was a case of typhoid fever—leaving only three fatal cases of true primary acute pneumonia. Of these, one died of cerebrospinal meningitis; a second suddenly, from supposed embolism; and a third, from extensive double pneumonia, with violent delirium. Details of the post-mortem appearances are much desired in these fatal cases. A rigid scrutiny into the true character of these cases therefore shows, instead of a mortality of one in 7½ cases, as is alleged, a real mortality of only one in 27 cases—that is, three deaths in 82 cases.

Since I published the accounts of 129 cases, on which my statistics were founded,[2] with four deaths, and a mortality therefore of one in 32¼ cases, I have treated in the clinical wards of the Royal Infirmary 24 other cases, with one death. This increases the mortality to 1 in 30?, in the total of 153 cases. Of these a tabulated account will be published, without which I venture to say little information can be obtained with regard to the results of any kind of treatment. Of this the analysis of the Boston cases offers sufficient proof; for although Dr. Borland says: “The greater proportion of these cases have been treated according to the plan set forth by Dr. Bennett, by restoratives directed to further the natural progress of the disease,” he does not appear to have remarked that all my cases were those of acute primary pneumonia, and not consecutive or secondary cases in individuals weakened by phthisis, broken down by long starvation and surgical injuries, or such as have become chronic with gangrenous abscesses.

Dr. Popham of Cork[3] tells us that he treated 30 cases of pneumonia by the restorative plan, and that, with the exception of two who were admitted in a dying state, all recovered. In 28 cases, therefore, admitting of treatment, all recovered. It is much to be regretted that these cases were not tabulated, so that the reader might judge of their extent, severity, and progress. We are told, however, that six were cases of double pneumonia; in eight the left lung only was engaged, and the right lung in fourteen. Dr. Popham also tells us that instances occurred so grave that he did not consider himself justified in trusting to restoratives alone. He therefore gave 5 grs. of bicarbonate of potash in mucilaginous liquid, and also employed epispastics. He is of opinion that the alkaline salt diminished the viscidity of the sputa, rendered the cough less harsh and the urine more alkaline. I hope Dr. Popham will pardon me for believing that these supposed advantages are to a great extent imaginary, and that his excellent paper can only be regarded as a valuable contribution, confirming the advantages of the restorative treatment.

An excellent example of a mild mixed treatment is described in a lecture by Dr. Sieveking,[4] who, in opposition to the views I have advanced, and the restorative treatment which has been proved to be so beneficial in pneumonia, lays down for his students two principles. These are, first, that pneumonia is not an entity, and second, that pneumonia differs in type at one and the same time, and therefore demands a varying treatment. As this last idea still extensively prevails among medical practitioners, it may be useful to analyse the evidence furnished by Dr. Sieveking of its correctness. It consists of four cases, very imperfectly recorded.

Case I.—A robust man, Æt. 26, admitted on the sixth day with pneumonia of lower half of right lung posteriorly. The treatment was confinement to bed and low diet. On the thirteenth day there was debility, for which quinine and ordinary diet was given. On the seventeenth day he was discharged well.

Now I have little doubt, and the cases I have recorded prove, that if this robust man had been well supported from the first he would have recovered much sooner, and that the quinine was altogether unnecessary.

Case II.—A healthy man, Æt. 22, admitted on the seventh day with double pneumonia at the bases, but to what extent is not stated: had marked dyspnoea, and other apparently urgent symptoms. He was bled by venesection to six ounces, and an acetate of ammonia mixture ordered, containing 1
12
gr. of antim. tart. for a dose, to be taken every three hours. On the following day there was great relief, and the disease was “knocked down,” although it is stated that dulness over the bases continued. He was dismissed cured “a few days” afterwards.

We have here the dyspnoea so commonly present in cases of double pneumonia on the sixth or seventh day, which readily disappears by itself, and is relieved by a warm poultice. It is supposed, however, that a small bleeding of six ounces “knocked down,” or, as some call it, jugulated or strangled the pneumonia. What really happened, however, was that the dyspnoea and apparently urgent symptoms disappeared on the eighth day, which is the usual occurrence. It is distinctly stated that the lungs remained consolidated, so that no impression was made on the disease. What is meant by being dismissed “in a few days” it is of course impossible to tell.

Case III.—A girl Æt. 15, admitted on the eighth day, with double pneumonia—the left side more affected than the right, but the extent on neither side stated. She was ordered mist. ammon. acet. with small quantities (?) of morphia. Two days afterwards articular rheumatism appeared. On the following day six leeches were applied to the left side with marked benefit, and a small quantity (?) of antimony was added to the mixture. Dismissed cured on the thirty-second day.

Here was a case of double pneumonia and acute rheumatism running their natural course in a weak subject. Is it to be supposed that six leeches to one side modified the one, or that the “small quantities” of morphia and other treatment influenced the other? Would not the course of both have been shortened by a restorative treatment?

Case IV.—A labourer, Æt. 23, admitted on the eighth day, with pneumonia below the fourth rib, anteriorly on the right side. “Six leeches with saline mixture, containing 1
12
gr. of antim. tart., followed by a blister, appeared (!) to give temporary relief.” On the twelfth day typhoid fever declared itself, with bronchitis. Brandy, stimulants, and poultices were then ordered. Dismissed cured on the thirty-fifth day.

Dr. Sieveking says of this case that probably the patient might have done equally well without the leeches and tartar emetic. Of this there can be no doubt. The progress of broncho-pneumonia is always more tedious than that of simple pneumonia, and the recovery was further delayed by the complication of typhoid fever. Can the treatment be defended?

How is it shown in these four cases that the pneumonia in all of them was not precisely the same, that it varied in type, or required a different treatment? That it may be complicated with various diseases, and be associated with strength or weakness of the individual attacked, is no proof of any specific change in the disease itself. In this respect it is in no way different at present from what it has ever been. Then, as to treatment, can it be seriously maintained that the low diet in the first case, that the loss of six ounces of blood in the second, or the six leeches and other treatment in the two others, benefited the pneumonia and hastened its resolution? Of this there is no proof whatever. Unquestionably they tended to an opposite result, as would at once be made apparent if Dr. Sieveking, instead of lecturing on four cases, would tabulate one hundred cases so treated, and let us count what follows. I submit, therefore, that the principles laid down by Dr. Sieveking are in no way supported by his own facts; and, as they are directly opposed to the conclusions derived from more extensive data, they offer no evidence in favour of that mixed treatment which seems so reasonable, and is so popular with many members of the profession.[5]

The question of blood-letting as a point of scientific practice has again been raised by Dr. Richardson,[6] who, appealing to that love of authority so powerful among medical men, asks—“Is it possible that twenty centuries were grossly abused by the infliction of what in the present state of feeling, was, on occasions, akin to crime? I believe not.” He then proceeds to discuss ten propositions—or, as he calls them, discoveries made by the ancients; and asks with regard to each of them how far the application of them is sound and judicious practice. His conclusion is, that blood-letting is still useful in some stages of typhus fever; in cases where there is sudden tension of blood, of which sunstroke is an example; in cases of chronic congestion of brain; in cases of acute pain from serous membrane; in some classes of spasmodic pain; in cases of sudden arrest of circulation from concussion; in cases of congestion of the right heart; and, it may be, in extreme cases of hÆmorrhage. Above all, he says, “I claim for it a first place in the treatment of simple urÆmic coma.”

It is impossible to discuss at length, in this paper, all the important practical points referred to by Dr. Richardson. But I shall refer to two great principles in modern as distinguished from ancient medicine, which I think must vitiate the most of his conclusions.

1. When the authority of the ancients is invoked to determine any procedure in medical practice, we must remember that their idea of what constituted disease consisted in the symptoms it manifested. When, therefore, a symptom was diminished or removed, they regarded the means they employed as having diminished or removed the disease. That a blood-letting relieves the pain and dyspnoea in pneumonia is an unquestionable fact. If employed early, it is true the symptoms returned, and the remedy had to be repeated; but if carried out on the fourth up to the eighth day, when, according to the extent of the disease, these symptoms usually subside, and the exudation commences to be absorbed, it appeared to act like a charm. It was then said that the disease was knocked down, or strangulated; and if the patient recovered, however lingering was his convalescence, the value of the remedy appeared to be unquestionable. This idea, it seems, still prevails with some physicians, as we have previously seen that Dr. Sieveking instructed his pupils that he had “knocked down” a double pneumonia by a small bleeding, although the condensation of the lungs—that is, the true disease—still continued.

But modern research has demonstrated that there is no relation whatever between the symptoms and the morbid state of the lung, which it is the object of the well-informed physician to remove. It would be easy to show that there are many cases where all the symptoms of a pneumonia have been present, but where a post-mortem examination has proved that there was no inflammation of the lung; and that a still larger number of instances might be cited where fatal pneumonia has occurred without any of its symptoms having existed during life. Such was the unacquaintance of the past race of practitioners with diagnosis and pathology as now understood, that no confidence whatever can be placed on their impressions as to what disorders were or were not benefited by bleeding.

That in certain cases a full blood-letting modifies or cuts short symptoms, I agree with Dr. Richardson in thinking is just as manifest a truth now, as it was to Galen or Cullen. But I claim for the modern physician a knowledge and a power far beyond that of alleviating symptoms: viz., a true knowledge of the lesion which causes the symptoms, and the power of conducting the disease to a rapid favourable termination, notwithstanding what appears to the inexperienced or uninformed the most alarming and fatal phenomena. He is enabled to watch with accuracy by means of his stethoscope the removal of the consolidation of the lung, to favour the resolution of the exudation, and to assist the excretion of the absorbed products from the economy. These are the aims of the modern practitioner—not so much the alleviation of symptoms as the removal of the morbid state—not soothing his patient, but saving his life. That he is capable of doing this by studying pathology and disregarding the authority of the ancients is no longer a matter of opinion, but is positively demonstrated, by attending to the other principle, which also is not referred to by Dr. Richardson.

2. In all the circumstances which Dr. Richardson thinks blood-letting still useful, we have no solid foundation on which the practitioner can repose with confidence as a general rule of practice. To refer to the opinions of the ancients is, as we have seen, useless; and to support their notions by citing one or two exceptional cases is of no advantage whatever. Indeed the quotation of successful cases, without also stating the failures that have been experienced, is the chief cause of the imperfection of practical medicine. It has been demonstrated that when the practice of bleeding in acute pneumonia was universal, the result was one death in three cases. That was what occurred in the carefully diagnosed and picked cases of M. Louis, as well as what happened in our best hospitals. In those days practitioners triumphantly pointed to the two cases out of three that they snatched from what was then considered a fatal attack of illness. Indeed it might easily be shown that the worst practice might be defended by what are called successful cases. So far from two survivors out of three being good practice, we have seen that the abandonment of blood-letting and the adoption of a restorative plan of treatment has resulted in diminishing the mortality to one in twenty-seven or thirty cases.

What I object to in medical literature is that prevalent kind of writing, which consists of plausibilities supported by successful cases. What we have at present a right to expect in the way of generalization or theory is that it should be based on positive researches, and not on fallacious authority; and as regards practice, we should have a reasonable number of cases recorded, in which the failures are given as well as the successes. To say that this or that treatment is good, because this or that case recovered, is of no advantage to medicine, unless it stimulate the practitioner to record his cases, tabulate the result, cease from vague opinion, and demonstrate the exact ratio of his success. It is satisfactory for the present state of medicine that such is the kind of inquiry now prosecuted by our most intelligent physicians.

When, therefore, Dr. Richardson is of opinion that a restoration of blood-letting is useful in some stages of typhus fever, and other circumstances previously referred to, I venture to think he should show how the mortality of that disease would be diminished thereby, when contrasted with the nutrient system of management introduced by Dr. Graves of Dublin. The same argument refers to other cases he has referred to. I believe with him that there are instances of urÆmic coma, in young and vigorous subjects, which may be cured by blood-letting, but as we have not yet accumulated a sufficient number of such cases it would be premature to speak confidently of the results.

But with regard to the treatment of acute pneumonia I regard the following axioms as fully established, viz.:—

1. The great end of medical practice is to remove the consolidation of the lungs and restore those organs to their natural condition as rapidly as possible.

2. To this end everything that diminishes vital strength should be avoided, and nutrients administered as early as possible, to favour the cell transformation necessary for removing the exudation from the lungs.

3. There is no relation between the violence of the symptoms or force of the pulse and the fatality of the disease. Young and vigorous subjects suffer most, but almost always recover soonest.

4. The weak pulse, want of reaction, non-disappearance of the pneumonic consolidation, or its appearance during the progress of exhaustive diseases, are the unfavourable signs of pneumonia.

5. Continued exercise or work after the attack; low diet, large blood-lettings; depressants, such as tartar emetic and sedatives; expectorants, such as squills and ipecacuanha; mercury and violent purgatives, are opposed to the restorative treatment of the disease, and when not fatal, tend to prolong its duration.

6. Small blood-lettings of from six to eight ounces may be used in extreme cases, more especially of double pneumonia or of broncho-pneumonia, as a palliative to relieve tension of the bloodvessels and congestion of the right heart and lungs.

7. Local pain is best relieved by large warm poultices.

8. The true disease, that is, the exudation which has infiltrated itself through the pulmonary tissues and been coagulated, constituting hepatization, can only be removed, first, by its transformation into pus cells; second, by the molecular degeneration and liquefaction of these; third, by absorption into the blood; and fourth, by excretion of the exuded matter in a chemically altered form through the evacuations.

9. These processes are favoured by supporting the vital powers: first, by rest in bed immediately after the attack; second, by beef-tea and milk during the febrile period, with a moderate amount of wine, if the pulse be feeble; third, by beefsteaks and solid food as soon as they can be taken, with more wine or a little spirits, if the pulse falter; fourth, by mild diuretics on the seventh or eighth day, to favour excretion by the kidneys.

10. The same pathology and principles of treatment apply to all simple cases of pneumonia, whether single or double—the latter being only modified by the weakness of the patient, when more restoratives and stimulants are required.

11. In complicated cases other treatment may be required, according to the circumstances of the case; the pneumonia, however, being always influenced in the manner previously detailed.

12. Since I commenced the treatment of pneumonia by restoratives on the principles just detailed, in 1848, 153 cases of the acute form of the disease have entered my clinical wards in the Royal Infirmary. Of these 129 were simple, and 24 complicated cases. They have been recorded by my clinical clerks, and the progress of each case superintended by my house physician. The whole investigation and the results have been arrived at in public, before successive large clinical classes. Of the 129 simple or uncomplicated cases, of which 35 were double, all recovered, notwithstanding many of them presented the most apparently alarming symptoms. Among the 24 complicated cases were five deaths—1 from ulcerated intestines, 2 from cerebral meningitis, and 2 from urÆmia following Bright’s disease. Of the whole series, the deaths were 1 in 30? cases. Among the simple cases, single or double, the mortality was nil.

NOTES ON THE USE OF POULTICES.

BY GEORGE W. CALLENDER," Assistant-Surgeon to St. Bartholomew’s Hospital.

Attention is at present attracted to various applications having for their object the better healing of wounds and sores of different kinds; but I should be sorry if, in the search after new, one at least of the ancient remedies should fall into disfavour. It has been asserted that poultices are often used to conceal defects of treatment, a kind of refuge in ignorance of any more advantageous applications, and that they often do positive harm by inciting profuse, and consequently exhausting, suppuration, and, no doubt, it is true they favour the tendency to suppuration which may exist in particular instances, and that they will increase a suppurating discharge when the latter is already established.

Most remarkable results, however, follow the use of poultices in certain cases—of lupus, for example. A woman attends at my out-patient room with ordinary lupus which, when first seen, had eaten away the middle portion of the upper lip, and had encroached upon the septum of the nose. A bread poultice was applied day and night to the ulcerated surface, and she took iodide of potassium. The sore was soon and completely healed. After six months she returned with the disease worse than ever, but it quickly healed again under treatment, and would, I am sure, remain well if she were ordinarily watchful over it. As the iodide of potassium may have had some influence in this instance, its use was dispensed with in other cases. A woman was taken into Sitwell ward with extensive lupus of the nose. It was with difficulty we persuaded her to submit to such simple treatment as the application of bread poultices continuously to the sore; she craved for physic, which was denied her. Very quickly the sore healed, and she left well. It is needless to record other and similar cases which have been treated in this simple fashion with the same satisfactory results.

Some months ago a man was sent to me from Woolwich with an ulcer on the outer angle of the orbit extending to the conjunctival surfaces of the lids; it was irregularly scabbed over. In my opinion, and in this I was confirmed by several of my colleagues, it was an example of so-called epithelial disease; at all events it had been an open and increasing sore for nearly five years, and before proceeding to remove it I agreed to try the effect of some local caustic. To clean the surface a bread poultice was applied, and it mended so much that this application was continued, when great part of the sore healed rapidly, and the remainder cicatrized after being touched with caustic zinc.

All surgeons are familiar with the good results which follow the application of a poultice to an acutely inflamed surface-part. Quite recently a woman has been under my care with inflammation of the tissues about the internal saphenous vein. She has progressed quite well towards convalescence by keeping the limb at rest, and by having the inflamed vein-track covered with a large poultice of linseed meal; no other treatment has been required. It is a common fault, not so much perhaps in hospital as in private practice, not to give a poultice the chance of curing a local inflammation by limiting its application to the part affected. A poultice to be of any use should widely cover the tissues which surround the seat of inflammation; for example, if the hand is inflamed the poultice should not only completely envelope it, but should extend at least half-way up the fore-arm: and this rule holds good especially when poultices are used for superficial or for subcutaneous diffused inflammation.

A little girl I saw recently in Sitwell ward had a fierce attack of inflammation, after measles, which involved one side of her face and neck. As it threatened to lead to suppuration we made three punctures, carried deeply amongst the tissues, and then applied a succession of large poultices to the entire of the affected side. In twenty-four hours the child, from a condition of great depression, was well enough to leave the hospital—the swelling was much reduced, probably by the draining away of serous fluid, but no suppuration was established. I often direct a bubo to be punctured with a grooved needle, the needle being carried across so as to make a double opening; poultices are then applied, and if the parts are moderately rested, the swelling will usually subside; if the bubo is suppurating the same treatment will suffice to evacuate the pus, and this having discharged the bubo disappears, and no trace even remains of the openings through which the pus has passed out. In cases such as those referred to, some without, some with a surface lesion, the mischief is remedied without any suppurative action being set up by the use of the poultices.

It is desirable, when there is much discharge into a poultice, to dust over the skin about the openings whence the discharge issues some oxide of zinc, or some other drying powder; if this precaution is not taken the matter will irritate and probably enlarge the opening, or will produce vesicles, which break and leave excoriations, or painful papulÆ on the adjacent integument. It should be remembered also that great heat is not needed with the poultice; it should be comfortably warm to the patient, and should never be allowed to get, by comparison with its condition when applied, so cold as to lessen the temperature of the part.

Ulcers of many kinds will heal rapidly when treated with poultices; and when I use the word “rapidly,” I refer to comparative quickness of healing, as ascertained by measuring the chief diameters of the ulcerated surfaces; their progressive over-closing is thus very accurately checked from week to week. This refers more especially to ordinary ulcers, such as result from injuries. A boy now attends in my out-patient room who under this treatment is healing up a sore on the fore-arm, the remains of a bad crushing of the part. Sometimes this healing is hastened by dusting the ulcer twice daily with powder of oxide of zinc before the poultice is at such times applied. In Sitwell ward a woman is just well of a severe phagedÆnic sore involving the skin over and below the knee. Mr. Cumberbatch, the dresser of the case, kept the parts at rest by swinging the limb, and applied at first an ordinary linseed poultice, then warm water dressing (another form of poultice), and, to expedite the healing of a few remaining sores, some resin ointment. The cure has occupied twenty-six days, a very rapid progress considering the constitutional nature of the affection: no medicine was needed.

I never could understand, seeing it is desirable to keep the parts immediately after an operation warm and quiet, why those objects should not be attained by the use of poultices; nothing I know of is more efficient to lessen the trouble caused by the starting of a limb after amputation, than the weight of and the resistance offered by a large poultice surrounding the stump. But their employment is in disfavour, first from the fear of their provoking recurrent bleeding, although this reckons for little if due care has been taken to have the wound thoroughly dry before closing it, and unless this care is taken there is little chance of its uniting by the first intention; secondly, by the prevailing notion that such union is prevented by the relaxing influence of this kind of dressing. Wishing to put this to the test of experience, the following cases, amongst others, were placed under treatment.

Having occasion to remove the larger portion of the left upper jaw of a female, about forty years of age, I brought together the incised wound of the face with wire sutures, and directed a bread poultice to be at once applied and renewed at intervals. The entire wound united by the first intention. A boy had his hand and fore-arm crushed by machinery, and it was necessary to perform amputation below the elbow. The flaps of integument were carefully adjusted, and the stump was poulticed. On the ulnar side the tissues united without suppuration; on the radial a portion of skin sloughed in consequence of the hurt it had sustained at the time of the accident, and on this side consequently the repair was less quickly completed. I recently amputated at the thigh, on account of strumous disease of the left knee of a boy, and brought the flap surfaces into apposition. The wound was at once covered with a linseed meal poultice. The next day, the stump being swollen, the wire sutures were cut. Bread poultices, and then warm water dressings, were afterwards employed, and the wound healed without any suppuration having been set up by the action of the local remedies. What pus did form was no more than might have been expected from incomplete primary union of portions of the cut surfaces.

I should like to see a more extended trial given to applications which keep a wound warm and moist continuously from the time of the operation. I think their use would give satisfactory results. No doubt they are most serviceable remedies throughout various forms of ulceration, and especially so in cases of lupus.

THE HYPODERMIC INJECTION OF MORPHIA IN MENTAL DISEASE: A CLINICAL NOTE.[7]

BY C. LOCKHART ROBERTSON, M.D. CANTAB., F.R.C.P.
Medical Superintendent of the Sussex Lunatic Asylum, Hayward’s Heath.

In the first number of the Practitioner, July 1868, Dr. Anstie has published a Paper on “The Hypodermic Injection of Remedies,” in which he truly says, that despite the satisfactory working of the method and of the greatly increased power in handling remedies which it gives us, it is still very much unappreciated. Believing that this remark applies even to the employment of the hypodermic injection of morphia in the treatment of mental disease, I venture on this occasion to lay before the Medico-Psychological Association in the half-hour we devote to Clinical Discussion, a brief outline of three successful cases illustrating the treatment by the hypodermic injection of morphia in recent mania, chronic mania, and melancholia respectively.

In October 1861 Dr. W. C. Mackintosh published a Paper in the Journal of Mental Science on “The Subcutaneous Injection of Morphia in Insanity,” which first drew my attention to this method of treatment. In the Reports of the Somerset Asylum, Dr. Boyd has also recorded his opinion of the value of this treatment in cases of maniacal excitement with sleeplessness, and in that form of destructive mania accompanied with dirty habits.[8]

The detail of the hypodermic method of treatment is carefully stated in Dr. Anstie’s Paper, and to this I must refer those who desire farther information regarding it. I use a solution of 6 gr. of the acetate of morphia to the drachm; Dr. Anstie’s strength is 5 gr. I always commence with ??v of the solution (½ gr.), and in only one case out of many hundred hypodermic injections of morphia has any injurious effects followed the remedy thus used.

Case I. Recent Mania.—J. H. W., No. 1,563, female, aged 20, single; domestic servant. Form of disease, acute asthenic mania.

History.—Never had any previous attack. No history of insanity in her family. Has been engaged for some years as a domestic servant. No reason can be given for her illness. It is stated that for the last three or four months she has been strange, and at times depressed, and that about three weeks ago she suddenly became maniacal, and has remained in a state of violent excitement ever since.

Progress.—On admission at Hayward’s Heath, on the 22d of March last, she was in a state of the most intense maniacal excitement, and very incoherent. Physically, she was suffering from marked typhoidal symptoms, her pulse was feeble and very rapid, her skin dry and harsh, her lips and teeth covered with sordes, her tongue coated with a thick creamy fur. She refused all food, and had had no sleep for several nights.

Although she could not be prevailed on to take any solid food, she was coaxed at times during the first two days after her admission to take ½ gr. of morphia in a little brandy, but she was almost invariably sick after it; moreover, the excitement continued, and she could obtain no sleep.

On the third day the hypodermic injection of ½ gr. of morphia was commenced, and continued every four hours except during the middle of the night. On the fifth day she was calm, although incoherent, and had slept during the whole of the previous night, took her food well, and had lost nearly all the typhoidal symptoms. Moreover, the irritability of the stomach was completely allayed.

She has since then recovered without a bad symptom, and she is now convalescent.

This case showed in a very marked manner the advantage of the hypodermic injection of morphia over its administration by the mouth in cases, which so frequently occur, of acute mania with marked asthenia and irritability of the stomach, causing refusal of food.

Case II. Chronic Mania.—W. H., No. 950, aged 68, single, groom. Form of disease, chronic mania, characterised by frequent recurrent attacks of maniacal excitement.

History.—Strong hereditary taint of insanity. Nearly all his brothers and sisters are more or less insane or eccentric. Much given to habits of intemperance, but, although often strange and eccentric, was never sufficiently insane to warrant his being placed in a lunatic asylum until he was 64 years of age, when he was attacked with acute mania and removed to Hayward’s Heath.

Progress.—During the attack of mania under which he was suffering when admitted into the asylum he was treated with small doses (??x) of tincture of digitalis every four hours. The symptoms lasted for nearly three months. He was then calm for many weeks. On the next outbreak of mania, equal parts of liq. opii were added to the digitalis, and with a beneficial effect, the attack not lasting so long.

He was thus treated for some two or three years. He generally suffered from three or four attacks in each year.

In April 1868 he had an unusually severe attack of excitement, combined with much noise and destruction of clothing. The usual medicines having no effect, he was treated with the subcutaneous injection of morphia (½ gr.) three or four times in the twenty-four hours, and with marked benefit.

On the recurrence of the next attack subcutaneous injection was had recourse to at once, and the period of excitement was reduced to little over a fortnight.

The next attack passed off in an equally satisfactory manner. In the January of the present year an attack of recurrent mania being evidently imminent, the old treatment of digitalis and opium was tried for fully a fortnight, but without benefit. On February 8th ½ gr. of morphia was injected, and the injection continued every six hours, and on February 10th (to quote from the case-book) he was decidedly improved and free from excitement and noise.

Not only, therefore, is the duration of the attack of recurrent mania diminished in this case, but during the attack the excitement is much less intense under the hypodermic method of treatment.

Case III. Melancholia.—M. T., No. 1,397, female, aged 57, married, domestic servant. Form of disease, acute recurrent melancholia.

History.—No hereditary taint of insanity. Has been insane and confined in asylums three or four times. She is temperate in her habits, and her attacks of insanity appear to have followed on most occasions the puerperal condition, but the present illness is stated to be due to family troubles.

Progress.—On admission she was suffering from the most acute type of melancholia, combined with insomnia, refusal of food, and a strong suicidal tendency. Moreover she was in a poor physical condition, having lost much in weight, and being thin and anÆmic.

In the first place she was treated with stimulants, sedatives, and a nourishing diet, but she remained from May 14th, the day of admission, until May 20th, without any improvement, and was becoming so reduced, from want of sleep and constant worry, that her life was despaired of. On the 20th May, 1868 (to quote from the case-book), “she passed a very restless night, and is much exhausted this morning: injected acetate of morphia gr. j, and she soon fell asleep; took her food well on awaking.”

On the 23d, “injected gr. j of morphia twice daily since the last entry, and with decided benefit, and she is much less excited. Sleeps well, and the suicidal tendency seems to have passed away.”

On July 15th the entry is as follows:—“Has improved uninterruptedly ever since the last entry, and is now tolerably sane.”

She was discharged recovered on 7th December, 1868, and has continued sane to this date, although in such a case another relapse is most probable.

ON THE THERAPEUTICAL VALUE OF THE INHALATION OF OXYGEN GAS.

BY EDWARD MACKEY, M.B. LOND. ETC.
Joint Professor of Materia Medica and Therapeutics in Queen’s College, Birmingham.

Our ordinary medicinal agents are substances from the animal, the vegetable, and the mineral kingdoms: the one here to be treated of is of that class of remedies which includes the great elements or forces of nature: such are water, in all the varied forms of bath; electricity, in its different developments; air, in all its modifications of pressure or composition.

It is unfortunate that the application of these mighty remedies seems liable to degenerate into charlatanism: partly perhaps because they have the power—wrongfully claimed for quack medicines—of doing good in many apparently different forms of disease; partly because their use must at present be limited to the few, and does not admit of ready introduction into the practice of the many.

Nevertheless, the truthful study of these agents offers scope for the highest science, and promises therapeutical results of the highest value. The following cases are offered as data for judging of the value of one of them. I do not propose to treat here of the chemistry of oxygen,[9] nor of its physiological effects, nor even of the objections which have been urged against its use—but simply to state facts which have come under my own observation.

Case I. Emphysema pulmonum (hereditary).—A lady of 55 had been for many years the subject of constant dyspnoea, increased on all movement, and often amounting to a sense of suffocation. A physical examination revealed sibilant rÂles with prolonged expiration heard all over the chest, which was of large capacity and more than normally resonant on percussion; the heart’s action was weak and the circulation embarrassed, as evidenced by oedema of the face and extremities.

She was subject to attacks of bronchitis occasionally, but, at the time of treatment, the general health was in fair condition; the prominent complaint was the difficulty of breathing.

On July 5, 1868, she inhaled a mixture of 3 pints of oxygen with 30 of air: the results were favourable. Within a few days the dose was doubled, 6 pints to 60: soon the proportion of 8 to 60 was used: and later, 12 to 60, and with this dose we seemed to obtain such good effects that I did not think it necessary to increase it. The inhalations were taken at intervals of three or four days for a space of six weeks; after each one, the lady experienced marked relief, which she expressed as being able to take a deep breath and get sufficient air—a feeling not known for years; as being able to move with comparative ease, feeling buoyant, and more like healthy persons should feel, than she ever remembered.

The only definite effect upon secretion was a more copious and facile expectoration, always produced, and lasting for a day or two; the effect upon the circulation was not marked at the time, but some palpitation occurred, generally in the nights which followed the taking of the larger doses; no other unpleasant symptoms whatever.

In attacks of exaggerated dyspnoea, as they occur sometimes in the emphysematous, and in those peculiar, nervous, irritable states apt to be induced by mental causes in the subjects of weak hearts, I have known her come into my consulting-room, inhale for half an hour, and express herself cheerful and composed. Nor was this the effect of fancy; for, at first, the lady had a prejudice against the plan; now she esteems it highly, nor has she ever found relief at all comparable to this, from the many medicines prescribed at various times by various practitioners.

Case II. is of the same nature, and occurred in a gentleman of 24, who had had good health till twelve months before, when he noticed for the first time wheezing, and afterwards cough, traceable partly to the dusty nature of his business, partly to wearing damp clothes. The chest symptoms continued so bad as to confine him to the house for three or four months; afterwards, he seemed gradually to recover under the use of tonics and cod oil, and the influence of a warmer climate, and when he came to me in January 1869 for the first time, he looked well; however, he complained of debility, of constant dyspnoea on exertion, and of exaggerated attacks of it occurring suddenly at times, of some cough and of glutinous expectoration; if he attempted to live well, as he had been told to do—meaning especially the taking of wine—he usually got an attack of epistaxis.

Physical examination revealed a sibilus at the end of inspiration, and a rhonchus with expiration over all the right lung, except the apex; the chest was very fully developed and abnormally resonant.

I prescribed for him inhalations of oxygen in the proportion of 12 pints to 60 of air, and he took these twice in the week for five weeks; after each one he expressed himself in much the same manner as the last patient, was conscious of a general feeling of renewed health, of a greater power of breathing, and of facility of expectoration; great improvement took place in his condition, and I think it must be credited principally to the gas; for, although I ordered him 10 to 20 drops of tinct. lobeliÆ at night-time, and later on tinct. fer. acetatis and frictions with the linim. tereb. acet., yet it is to be borne in mind that he had previously had a fair trial of expectorants, tonics, and even change of air, without anything like equivalent relief.

Case III. Phthisis pulmonalis.—Mrs. W——, Æt. 31, who had lost her father and sisters of consumption, consulted me in Dec. 1867. For the last six months had had cough, for the last three had emaciated, and at this time had the prostration, night sweats, diarrhoea, and hectic of the third stage of phthisis; hÆmoptysis had occurred several times: the expectoration was generally purulent. There were violent pains, especially over left chest, and examination revealed a fine crepitus at apex of left lung. The patient was treated with ordinary medicines, and improved gradually. Opium in the form of an atomized spray was found to be the best medicine for relieving cough, and procuring sleep; tincture of steel and carbolic acid used in the same manner relieved, to a certain extent, the profuse expectoration; and although the case became complicated with a peri-uterine hÆmatocele, in February 1868 she rallied from this also.

It was July 1868 before she could walk as far as my house. Her principal symptoms then were debility, pains in the chest, cough, and copious muco-purulent sputum. At this time she began inhalations of oxygen in the proportion of 6 pints to 60 of air, increasing by degrees to 12 pints. She took eight inhalations at intervals of two days, and then found the above symptoms so much relieved as to be able to omit all treatment for a time. She herself attributed great benefit to the gas, and was taking no other special medicine at the time. Since then she has borne fairly well the cares of a large family. She has gained flesh, and though there is still a frequent cough, and sputum, and a mucous rÂle about the left apex (I examined the chest two days ago), the progress of the disease is arrested for a time at least.

Case IV. points precisely in the same direction. In May 1868 I was consulted by a gentleman of 19, whose father died of phthisis. He had been steward on board a packet plying between Liverpool and New York; got wet through on his last voyage, lung symptoms soon set in, and he considers that his present ones date from three months ago. He has constant cough, for which he can get no relief, profuse sweatings, hectic, and extreme emaciation; in short, all the ordinary signs of softening tubercle in the right apex, and had been sent home by medical men in Liverpool to Handsworth,—just to die. However, he too rallied under careful nursing, and with the help of ordinary medicinal agents, and by July was able to walk to my house, and begin inhalations of oxygen in proportion of 6 pints to 60. At this time the above-named symptoms were all better, and his principal complaint was of difficulty of breathing, and of pain in the side of the chest, and these did not yield to medicines or to liniments. He continued to inhale twice a week for two months, and at the end of that time was sufficiently recovered to seek for a situation. He is now in the employ of the London and North-Western Railway Company, has gained two stone, he says, and is 6 ft. 4 in. in height. I had an opportunity of examining his chest last week, and detected only dry and interrupted respiration in one apex. I should add that he continued the tinct. fer. perchlor. and cod oil during and after his treatment by gas; but he distinguished relief to the dyspnoea from the gas alone.

Case V.—Rev. W. M——, aged 34, lost father, brothers, and sisters from phthisis. In February 1868, when I first saw him, the prominent symptoms had lasted six months—the dyspepsia, the tight cough, the loss of voice, and the emaciation.

In March the physical signs of phthisis were evident in the left apex, as was ascertained by Dr. Russell, who saw the patient with me at that time. I need not detail symptoms or treatment, as they did not differ from what is usual; suffice it to say that improvement took place, but was temporary, and in April we recommended him to visit Jersey. He was there for three months (being considerably longer than I had intended), and at that time he thought that he found benefit from the sulphurous acid spray. However, he returned as bad, if not worse, than when he went, with night sweats, extreme prostration, cough, difficulty of breathing, and purulent expectoration. It was in this condition, and when he had had a trial of almost every other remedy, including a prolonged course of cod oil, that I proposed oxygen to him, and he began it July 24, 1868, in proportion of 6 pints to 60, increasing gradually up to 10 to 60, and taking this two or three times a week up to October 8, a period of 2½ months; during the whole course of the time, he had expressed himself as much relieved, both as to breathing power, cough, character of expectoration, appetite, and strength. He had gained weight, and the malady was quiescent. He had been accustomed to come from the country by train, and to ride back in a cab. On one unfortunate day (October 8), which was cold and very wet, he got into a cab the window of which was broken, drove six miles in the night air, in the course of that night got a sudden pain in the side, and dyspnoea, and when I saw him next day pneumonia had attacked the right lung, and he was desperately ill.

Now the point of the case is this. It has been said that the inhalation of oxygen is liable to cause inflammation of the lung. Did it do so in this patient? That must be a question to be decided on the evidence, but I cannot think that it did. The dilution of the gas was great; the same quantity had been inhaled for weeks before without any injury, and the other exciting cause was such a probable one. At the end of a month’s time he was convalescent, and urgently requested the resumption of his inhalations. I consented, and he again expressed relief from them, especially as to the dyspnoea; but effusion in the right pleura came on gradually, but too surely; for some time we saw the end approaching, and he died last month. Almost to the last he expressed benefit from the gas, and he certainly suffered less than any consumptive patient whom I have ever seen.[10]

Case VI.—I adduce as an instance of another variety of dyspnoea a warehouse woman of 27, who had also lost several brothers and sisters of phthisis. Had been much depressed by nursing the last one through a long and painful illness; she came to me in June 1868, with symptoms of dyspepsia and history of attacks of urgent difficulty of breathing coming on generally at a fixed hour of 9 or 10 in the morning; occasionally after later meals; she kept constantly sighing deeply, and had various symptoms of hysterical temperament; had also cough and viscid expectoration; but a physical examination revealed nothing very definite—perhaps puerile respiration in one lung and diminished vesicular murmur in the other.

She was treated for some weeks with various stomachic and tonic medicines, and went into the country for a fortnight; but the symptoms remained more or less.

It was during an attack of this spasmodic or hysterical dyspnoea that I first administered oxygen to her, in proportion of 5 pints to 30 of air, and again in a double dose, only on three or four occasions.

It is possible that these doses were not large enough for a fair trial; but, however, I wish to record that relief was given, but it was slight and not permanent. Eventually the patient recovered under the use of bromide of potassium and quinine. She has since married, and is well.

Case VII. Chlorosis.—Miss P——, Æt. 21, had been employed for some years with very long hours of work in a small close room; was stunted in growth, with chlorotic complexion, drowsiness, headache, palpitation, dyspnoea, and great fulness of the thyroid gland. Menstruation still occurred, though scantily, and at intervals of six to ten weeks.

She came under my care in January 1868, and after regulating her hours and her food as far as possible I prescribed various preparations of iron, of magnesia, of aloes and myrrh, baths, and liniments, &c.

There was a gradual improvement in her condition with occasional relapses, which obliged her to remain under treatment for many months. In October 1868 the prominent symptom was headache, violent and pulsating, and it was for this that I prescribed oxygen, after the failure of many medicines.

November 8th.—Inhaled 6 pints diluted with 30 of air; pulse 96 before commencing, had same frequency at the end; the only special symptom felt was a sense of oppression at the chest, but the headache was not so bad as usual that night.

9th.—When she entered my room the headache was violent; she inhaled 12 pints in 60 of air, and before finishing, the headache had disappeared, and she felt better; this occurred on several though not on all occasions, but she continued the use of the gas for ten days only. She was then obliged to be away for a time, and the headaches returned shortly afterwards: relief had been given, but not permanently. Perseverance here might have shown good results, but an opportunity occurring soon afterwards of a residence in the country for some months, I recommended her to take advantage of it; she has recently returned much improved in health, and is following her occupation again.

The two following cases are somewhat allied to the last, in being disorders of secretion or excretion, and are examples of that so common complaint in town people, hepatic congestion; the results were exceptionally favourable, and although under ordinary medicines patients generally improve in a satisfactory manner, yet the malady sometimes shows such a disposition to return, that one really scruples about prescribing over and over again rhubarb, magnesia, nux vomica, acids, or blue pill.

Case VIII.—Mrs. B——, Æt. 40, mother of a large family, had been subject to bilious attacks for many years, and had several times been under my care. In May 1868 she had pain over hepatic region, depression, nausea, headache, and yellow conjunctivÆ; the stools were frequent, loose, and pale; menstruation was profuse, and occurred oftener than normal.

She took at first dilute acids with tinct. rhei co. and improved, but relapsed at the end of June, and it was then that I recommended the gas to her; the prominent symptoms being headache, depression, complete loss of appetite, and a constriction about the chest “as if she could not get air enough:” menorrhagia had been going on for two days.

June 23d.—Inhalation of 4 pints in 60: there was not any marked effect.

25th.—6 pints in 60, and before the inhalation was over the headache was relieved, and all that day she felt “lighter” and better, though rather strange; to bed early, and slept and woke without headache, the first time for nearly twelve months, and was nearly free from her shoulder pain.

27th.—Dose repeated with similar good results, and no medicine taken; the diet was regulated as it had been before. To be brief, she took eight inhalations on alternate days, and at the end of that time was well enough to do without treatment: not that she was quite well, but restored to her ordinary health, and the improvement has up to this time continued.

Case IX.—A lady of 21, after a period of great mental anxiety and of close application to business, began to feel extreme depression, drowsiness, anorexia, headache, nausea, and interscapular pain; the pulse was slow, the face pale; there were palpitation and dyspnoea without signs of organic disease. The symptoms had lasted about two months, when I first saw her in July 1868. She took alkalies, aperients, and appropriate medicines, and on the 12th took inhalation, 7 pints in 60. Here again the same remarkable effect was produced, in relieving headache before the end of the quantity. She continued to inhale a little larger dose every third day for a fortnight, without taking any medicine for the latter part of the time. She has remained fairly well ever since, and voluntarily expressed the great benefit which she derived from the gas, especially as to relieving a sense of constriction across the chest and dyspnoea.

Both these cases were tolerably acute, and occurred in persons of naturally “sanguine” temperament, but it is necessary to record that another case which I have treated more recently,—a young lady of “bilious” temperament, who suffered from hepatic congestion in a more chronic form,—found no special effect whatever from inhalations taken on alternate days, for a fortnight.

Case X. was one of albuminuria in a lady of 57. The disease had commenced four years before, and her health had been markedly impaired for the last twelve months (dating from an attack of vertigo, and loss of consciousness). Last winter she had had bronchitis. She was a lady highly connected, and had been under the care of several eminent London physicians, who had concurred in advising her to go into the country for a time, and I was sent for to see her in November last, when she had already been at a country-house in this neighbourhood for some months.

She was feeble, with pallid face and injected cheeks; extremities oedematous; dyspnoea to a great extent on the slightest exertion; tendency to fainting and giddiness; urine deposited urates, and gave a cloud of albumen with the usual tests. Almost the only remedy which had not been given to her was this gas. I requested her to write and ask her physician if he concurred in its use; he wrote back to say “by all means,” and on November 18 she began with 14 pints in 60 of air. The pulse was 78 at commencing, and did not vary. She took it six times at intervals of three days. I had anticipated good from it, but there was really no marked effect. She thought, in fact, that her headache was rather worse afterwards, but I think that was better accounted for by the carriage drive to my house and the extra excitement.

Treatment was omitted for a time, and in the interval she got an attack of subacute bronchitis; on recovery she hired an apparatus of her own, and began, on December 12, 16 pints to 60. I consider that she had a week’s fair trial, but at the end of that time, what with leakage in the machine and non-arrival of gas, the lady’s patience failed, and the treatment was not persevered with. I mention these matters as an instance of one of the difficulties that an unusual mode of treatment must necessarily contend with. However, the result of this treatment, such as it was, gave no encouragement to persevere.

Case XI. resembled the last in the fact of there being organic disease. She was a delicate and refined lady, of the age of 34, unmarried. With a history of some years of spinal debility, and of congestive headache, at this time (September 1868) there was general prostration, numbness, and tingling in various parts, a sense of suffocation and of constriction, and partial loss of power over limbs; but worse than all, the attacks of headache of frightful intensity, attended with throbbing, flushing, and confusion of thought, and generally located over the left eye, which then protruded very much. Of these and other symptoms, some were explicable on the hypothesis of congestion of the spinal cord, and parts of the cerebrum, while some suggested a grave suspicion of ramollissement; others, again, of a chronic thickening of the membranes. My opinion was necessarily doubtful, but with regard to remedies oxygen offered a prospect of relieving at least some of these symptoms; it is said to have done so in recorded cases. Moreover, the patient had had the best obtainable advice in her own town of Wolverhampton and in the city of Cork, remedies prescribed by her physician had not benefited her, and for some months she had been under homoeopathic treatment at home and at Malvern. I recommended her to hire an apparatus for her own use; and on October 4 she began with 12 pints to 50 of air, the inhalation to be extended over the period of one hour. The necessary exertion tired her, and she felt no appreciable relief. I did not like to wait longer without attempting to relieve by some of our usual remedies, and I prescribed gr. viij pot. brom. with ??viij. liq. ergotÆ, as having a special influence in equalizing the spinal circulation.

Oct. 12.—Head bad, but not so bad as usual. On 15th, menstruation came on, and aggravated symptoms somewhat.

I directed inhalations to be increased in strength every day, until I reached equal proportions of air and oxygen—as much as 30 pints of each.

On October 21 had an attack of prostration to a more extreme degree than ever known before; she seemed, in fact, at the point of death from sheer exhaustion. And here again we are met by the important question—Was this due to oxygen? for experience recorded of its effects seems to warrant this apparent paradox, that although in many cases a stimulant, in some it is a depressant; that although it will increase the vital powers when only moderately depressed, it will tend to lower them when they are already very much lowered.[11] Or, again, was the prostration due to the bromide of potassium?

Candidly, I do not think that it was due to these causes, partly because she had had no inhalation for two days before, and no medicine for three days, and partly because a depression similar, though less in degree, has followed menstruation on other occasions, and this had been more profuse than usual.

For the time I gave her quinine and brandy and a little morphia, and on the 23d permitted her to resume inhalation, beginning at 12 to 60; she again gradually increased the dose to 30 pints in the day. For the bromide of potassium I substituted small doses of strychnia. The administration of the gas in varying doses was persevered with till November 4—a full month altogether—then I recommended her to discontinue it. The effect was certainly not marked; if there was any, it might be in relieving the sense of suffocation, which was not so bad during that month as it had been before and since; but on the whole the gas must be considered to have failed in this case. However, it will be remembered that many other remedies had failed also, and the further progress of the case has convinced me of the presence of serious organic disease; it is in fact two months since I have ceased to entertain or give any hope whatever of this lady’s recovery.

Case XII. was one of general debility with irritable heart. A gentleman of 35, who had lost several brothers by phthisis, and had been subject to unusual harass and exertion, began to lose appetite, to grow thin, and to suffer from lassitude, dyspnoea, and palpitation. When he came to me in May 1868, the symptoms had lasted for two or three months, but I could detect no physical signs of disease. For some weeks he took quinine, aconite, and cod oil, and applied belladonna; still he did not improve much.

On June 21, he inhaled 4 pints mixed with 30 of air, and felt a “greater lightness”—no increase of palpitation. After four days of treatment, he got an opportunity of spending a fortnight in the Highlands, and I recommended him to try the breathing of oxygen there. He returned home, however, in July, not so much improved as we had hoped, and still complaining much of soreness about the chest, and oppressed breathing. From this time to September he took an inhalation every third or fourth day, and with perceptible benefit. It is true that he took, for some weeks of the time, the hypophosphate of lime and cod oil, but still the effect of the inhalation in improving breathing power, and appetite especially, was immediate enough to convince us that it had a large share in his recovery. He has remained fairly well since.

To resume: 12 cases are here related; 2 of the 12 are of organic, and in all probability incurable disease, and these 2 derived little or no benefit from the inhalation of oxygen; the other 10 found benefit as recorded, some more, some less, but all of a kind which I have not seen given by medicine alone. It remains to ask—Is there any common character by which we may connect together this series of cases, and which may enable us to say, oxygen is good for such and such a class of cases, as we say iodide of potassium or quinine is good for such and such a class?

I think that we may find some such common character in the presence of congestion, especially venous congestion, whether of the liver, the lungs, or the uterus: more than this I will not say at present; the classification of carefully-observed cases, and a rational theory of this “modus medendi,” are points that require special study, and cannot be dogmatised upon until we have a wider basis of facts.

Strumous Ophthalmia, associated with herpes of the face, or as it may be termed the herpetic form of strumous ophthalmia, is a disease so often met with in general practice, and one so little amenable to local treatment, that I venture to say a few words regarding its treatment constitutionally. I should hesitate to occupy valuable time and space with what appears to be a trivial subject, on which much has already been written, did I not believe that by so doing additional light might be thrown upon the subject. For several years past I have been collecting evidence, carefully sifting and placing all well-marked cases aside for special treatment. The results obtained in the earlier batches of cases thus treated, decided me to continue such treatment for a lengthened period. The evidence thus obtained being highly satisfactory, other treatment formerly employed was abandoned.

During the time that has since elapsed, I have continued to employ the same remedy with the same good results.

This form of the disease generally presents itself in fat, red-faced children who have the appearance of robust health. On questioning the parents, they will perhaps inform you that the child was but small and puny at birth, and for the first few months of its life it was sickly and delicate, and not until lately had it become so stout and healthy. They attribute the change to the purer air the child now breathes, for they have removed from a populous and unhealthy district to one less crowded and decidedly more healthy.

In such a child we find traces of constitutional defect in enlarged and rickety joints, a head big and ill-shapen, and an anterior fontanelle not completely closed. We find a thick and prominent lip, conspicuous for the extent of mucous membrane it shows.

The intolerance of light is so intense that the child cannot bear even a moderate degree, but persists in burying its face in its hands, or hiding from the light in some dark corner. But what strikes us so forcibly, and what really is so characteristic of the case, is the fact that the patient’s face is disfigured with patches of herpes,—a fact which makes us hopeful, as these cases are as a rule the most amenable to treatment. To cure the disease of the skin is to cure the disease of the eye in the most rapid and satisfactory manner.

In the majority of the cases which have come under my care, the eruption was confined to one-half of the face below the brow. In a small proportion the side of the nose was not affected, and in several the skin of the upper lip and chin escaped altogether. The vesicles in most of the cases appeared to follow the course taken by those branches of the infra-orbital nerve which supply the skin of the face.

My notes do not supply me with any case where the eruption invaded the brow, although I may have overlooked some such case in my earlier investigations on the subject. The eruption was often accompanied by a febrile condition more intense than I have ever met with in the other forms of strumous ophthalmia.

Before proceeding to active treatment, instructions regarding diet, regulation of the bowels, &c. should be given. The diet should be plentiful, simple, and nutritious; and all articles of food likely to unduly tax the digestive powers (which are as a rule weak in such children) should be carefully avoided. Strict attention should be paid to the bowels, which ought to be opened at least once during each day, but oftener if the appetite be faulty, the tongue loaded, and the fÆces light coloured and of bad odour. These preliminary instructions having been attended to, special treatment may be adopted.

It is well to begin with small doses of the arsenic in form of Fowler’s solution. Two drops may be given thrice daily, in some bitter infusion, to a child between one and two years of age, and gradually increased to four drops. Seldom is it requisite to further increase the dose. Arsenic appears to exercise a marked control over the febrile symptoms of this disease. As the herpetic eruption diminishes, the child ceases to shun the light, and as the rash fades the pustule on the eye heals. The benefit of fresh air in the more obstinate forms of the disease is well known; but it is often difficult to convince parents that exercise in the fresh air will benefit the child. They imagine that it is rather hurtful than otherwise, because the intolerance of light is then a distressing symptom, proper means not having been taken to shade the eyes. A ready method is to place over each eye a pad of cotton wool, and over the pads a bandage, which should encircle the head, and tie on the occiput. The pads should be frequently renewed and the eyelids washed with warm water.

In a future paper I hope to bring forward additional facts on the subject, and conclude by giving the history of a number of cases.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

Clyx.com


Top of Page
Top of Page