1 I shall only here take into consideration the most important publications out of the enormous amount of neurological literature of the war, and only in so far as this refers to psycho-analysis. I am indebted to Dr. M. Eitingon and Prof. Dr. A. v. SarbÓ for access to the necessary authorities.
2 One of Oppenheim’s critics has suggested that these words so difficult to pronounce might be used as test words in the examination of paralytic disturbances of speech, so that they might at least be of some good.
3 These facts have been confirmed in the course of the conference by all taking part in the discussions.
4 (“MÜnchner Mediz. Wochenschrift”. 1918, No. 42, P. 1150.)
5 The hallucinations, which those persons who having had an amputation experience, that that part of the body which has been taken away is still there, might find an explanation from this source.
6 The intention of the medical department of the Prussian War Ministry in regard to the organisation of psycho-analytical treatment stations was not carried out in consequence of the altered political situation, which took place soon after the Congress.
7 Read before the Royal Society of Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, April 9, 1918. Published in the Proceedings, Vol. XI. Reprinted in “Papers on Psycho-Analysis”: Jones, 2nd. Ed. 1918, Ch. XXXIII, p. 564. (BailliÈre, Tindall & Cox.).
8 By Freud, “Allgemeine Neurosenlehre”, 1917, S. 286.
15 The latest discussion of the subject will be found in Freud’s “Allgemeine Neurosenlehre,” 1917, chapter xxv, “Die Angst”. See also his papers in “Sammlung kleiner Schriften zur Neurosenlehre,” 1906, chapters v, vi, vii, and a general review of the subject in my “Papers on Psycho-Analysis,” 2nd ed., 1918, chapter xxvii, “The Pathology of Morbid Anxiety”.
16See also Stekel, “AngstzustÄnde,” 2e. Aufl., 1912.
